Surgery For Right-sided Colon Cancer Research Articles

Prognostic nomogram in patients with right-sided colon cancer after colectomy: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-based study.

This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing surgery for right-sided colon cancer (RCC). We collected 25,203 patients with RCC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and randomly divided them into 7:3 training and internal validation set. Utilizing the Cox proportional hazards regression model, we constructed a nomogram based on prognostic risk factors. Furthermore, for external validation, we retrospectively followed up with 228 patients from Jiaxing First Hospital and assessed and calibrated the nomogram using the C-index and calibration curves. After identifying independent prognostic factors through univariate and multivariate analyses, a nomogram was developed. The c-index values of this nomogram differed as follows: 0.851 (95% CI: 0.845-0.857) in the training set, 0.860 (95% CI: 0.850-0.870) in the internal validation set, and 0.834 (95% CI: 0.780-0.888) in the external validation set, indicating the model's strong discriminative ability. Calibration curves for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS) probabilities exhibited a high level of consistency between predicted and actual survival rates. Furthermore, Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) demonstrated that the new model consistently outperformed the TNM staging system in terms of net benefit. We developed and validated a survival prediction model for patients with RCC. This novel nomogram outperforms the traditional TNM staging system and can guide clinical practitioners in making optimal clinical decisions.

Robotic True D3 Lymph Node Dissection With Superior Mesenteric Vein-Taping Technique for Right-Sided Colon Cancer.

D3 is unaffected by anatomic factors even when the ileocolic artery runs along the dorsal side of the superior mesenteric vein. Complete "true D3" lymph node dissection in minimally invasive surgery for right-sided colon cancer could be beneficial for certain patients with lymph node metastases. The study aimed to determine the safety and feasibility of robotic true D3 lymph node dissection for right-sided colon cancer using a superior mesenteric vein-taping technique. The superior mesenteric vein was slowly and gently separated from the surrounding tissues and taped. Lifting the tape with the robotic third arm and fixing it in place using rock-stable tractions provides a good surgical view, which cannot otherwise be obtained. As a result, the ileocolic artery that branches from the superior mesenteric artery can be accurately exposed. Handling of the taping then enables expansion to a different surgical view. As the lymph nodes are originally concealed on the dorsal side of the superior mesenteric vein, this technique provides a good view for lymph node dissection. The root of the ileocolic artery was clipped and separated, and true D3 was thus completed. Fourteen patients underwent robotic true D3 lymph node dissection for right-sided colon cancer. No Clavien-Dindo classification grade II or higher intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%. Our robotic true D3 lymph node dissection with superior mesenteric vein-taping technique is considered safe and feasible; it might be a promising surgical procedure for treating advanced right-sided colon cancer. Even when the ileocolic artery runs along the dorsal aspect of the superior mesenteric vein, the technique seems promising for facilitating robotic D3 lymph node dissection.

Usefulness of intraoperative ultrasound examination for laparoscopic right-side colon cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched study

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) in laparoscopic surgery for right-sided colon cancer (RSCC) requires a precise understanding of the vascular anatomy. The efficacy of intraoperative ultrasound (IUS) in the identification of blood vessels for RSCC surgery was not evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative and short-term outcomes of CME with CVL with or without IUS by laparoscopic surgery for RSCC. We performed IUS on 26 patients of RSCC and compared with a total of 124 patients who underwent the surgery for RSCC at our institution. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the confounding effects to imbalances in the use of IUS. The IUS identified the main feeding artery and the accompanying vein in all 26 cases. After PSM, the amount of intraoperative blood loss in the IUS group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (5 ml vs. 30 ml, p = 0.035) and no significant difference of the postoperative complications was observed. The IUS reduced the risk of bleeding in the surgery for RSCC. The IUS is a safe and feasible technique that help the surgeons for anatomical understandings under real-time condition in the laparoscopic surgery of RSCC.

Surgical outcomes of a prospective, phase 2 trial of robotic surgery for resectable right-sided colon cancer (the ROBOCOLO trial).

We evaluated the safety of robotic surgery for right-sided colon cancer in Japan. This was a prospective, open-label, single-arm phase II trial conducted at two institutions. Patients ≥20 years old with stage I-III right-sided colon cancer and scheduled for radical resection with ≥D2 lymph node dissection were eligible. The criterion for surgeons was experience performing robot-assisted rectal resection in ≥40 cases. The primary endpoint was the postoperative complication rate ≤30 days after surgery. From August 2021 to February 2023, 42 patients were enrolled; three were excluded, with 39 analyzed as the full analysis set. The median age was 72 years, and the median body mass index was 23.2. The tumor was located in the cecum in 13 cases (33.3%), ascending colon in 20 cases (51.3%), and transverse colon in six cases (15.4%). Ileocolic resection was performed in 17 cases (43.5%) and right hemicolectomy in 22 cases (56.5%), both with D3 lymph node dissection. The median console time was 109 min, and the operative time was 170 min. The mean blood loss was 7.7 mL. Intracorporeal anastomosis was performed in 28 patients (71.8%). There were no conversions and no intraoperative adverse events. The median postoperative stay was 5 days. Postoperative complications occurred in four patients (10.2%; paralytic ileus [n = 3] and pneumonia [n = 1]). All postoperative complications were grade 1 or 2, with no mortalities noted. R0 resection was achieved in all patients. This study demonstrated the safety and feasibility of robotic surgery for right-sided colon cancer.

Comparison of conventional right colectomy and complete mesocolic excision technique—case–control analysis of short-term results

Summary Introduction The long-term oncologic advantages of complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation and extended lymphadenectomy in right-sided colon cancer have been emphasized in several studies, without compromise of perioperative morbidity or mortality; however, prospective randomized data are scarce. Methods We performed a single-center non-randomized case–control study comparing conventional non-CME right colectomies (nCME) and complete mesocolic excision (CME) procedures during the period from January 2019 to December 2020. Perioperative morbidity, length of hospital stay (LOHS), operative time, and lymph node yield were analyzed. Results A total of 131 patients underwent surgery for right-sided colon cancer, with 28 (21%) in the CME group and 103 (79%) in the conventional group. Operative time was significantly longer in the CME group (p < 0.001) compared to conventional procedures. The duration of hospitalization was statistically similar (p = 0.226), no difference was observed in 30-day morbidity (p = 0.166), and the majority of complications in both groups were grades 0–2 (CME: 82%; nCME: 91%). There were no 30-day mortalities. The lymph node yield in CME was significantly higher compared to the conventional surgery (p = 0.041). Conclusion Complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right-sided colon cancer is safe without increasing complications or hospital stay, with an acceptable increase in operative time. The significant increase in lymph node yield enables better staging and may lead to improved long-term oncologic outcomes.

The concept of developmental anatomy: the greater omentum should be resected in right-sided colon cancer?

BackgroundThe greater omentum is derived from the foregut, and the right hemicolon is derived from the midgut based on developmental anatomy. This study aimed to investigate whether the greater omentum should be resected in laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision based on developmental anatomy for right-sided colon cancer.MethodsA total of 183 consecutive patients with right-sided colon cancer were recruited in this study between February 2020 and July 2022. Ninety-eight patients underwent standard laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision surgery (CME group). The presence of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases was detected in resected greater omentum by the HE staining and immunohistochemistry analysis. Based on developmental anatomy, laparoscopic CME surgery with greater omentum preservation (DACME group) was proposed and performed on 85 right-sided colon cancer patients. To overcome selection bias, we performed a 1:1 match between two groups using four variables: age, sex, BMI, and ASA scores.ResultsNo isolated tumor cells and micrometastases were found in the resected greater omentum specimen in the CME group. After the propensity score, 81 pairs were balanced and analyzed. Patients in the DACME group showed shorter operative time (194.9 ± 16.4 min vs.201.5 ± 11.5 min, p = 0.002), less blood loss (23.5 ± 24.7 ml vs.33.6 ± 26.3 ml, p = 0.013), and the shorter hospital stays (9.6 ± 1.7 days vs.10.3 ± 2.0 days, p = 0.010) compared with patients in the CME group. In addition, patients in the DACME group had a lower incidence of postoperative complications (4.9% vs.14.8%, p = 0.035) than patients in the CME group.ConclusionThe greater omentum should be preserved during right-sided colon cancer surgery, laparoscopic CME surgery based on developmental anatomy is technically safe and feasible for right-sided colon cancer.

Left-Sided Colon Cancer and Right-Sided Colon Cancer: Are They the Same Cancer or Two Different Entities?

Background Colon cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world and one of the main causes of cancer-related deaths. In Morocco, it occupies the first place among digestive cancers. Right-sided and left-sided colon cancers have different embryological, epidemiological, pathological, genetic, and clinical characteristics. This distinction leads to differences in the evolution and prognosis of the disease. This study aimed to identify epidemiological factors and clinical and pathological characteristics that can influence perioperative and prognostic outcomes in patients with right-sided colon cancer compared to those with left-sided colon cancer. Methodology We conducted a retrospective cohortstudy over a period of nine years from January 2012 until December 2020. We included 277 patients divided into two groups, namely, right colon cancer (group 1) (n = 99) and left colon cancer (group 2) (n = 178). Results The average age of our series was 57.4 years, with extremes ranging from 19 to 89 years old (SD = ±13.6451 years). The average age in the right colon group was 55.97 (SD = ±13.341 years). The average age in the left colon group was 58.18 (SD = ±13.69 years). The male gender had a predominance, with a sex ratio of 1.3 for both groups. Among the patients in group 2, 65% showed lymph node involvement on the CT scan, whereas only 34% of patients in group 1 displayed the same condition. The recurrence rate in the right-sided colon cancer group was 22.2% compared to 24.9% in the left-sided group. The five-year overall survival was estimated for the right-sided and left-sided colon cancer groups at 87% and 96.5%, respectively. In patients with stage III and IV cancer, overall survival was better for those who underwent surgery for left-sided colon cancer compared to those who underwent surgery for right-sided colon cancer (p = 0.029). In the case of vascular emboli or involvement of the perineural sheath, there was no significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.446 and p = 0.655, respectively). The three-month survival without recurrence was almost identical in both groups (31% for right-sided colon cancers and 30.9% for left-sided colon cancers). Age over 61 years was a predictive factor of poor prognosis in recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio = 3.245; p = 0.023). Conclusions We identified factors that can influence perioperative outcomes and prognosis in patients with right-sided colon cancer compared to those with left-sided colon cancer. Our findings suggest that age and lymph node involvement along with other factors play a role in the overall survival and recurrence outcomes of these patients. Further research is necessary to explore these differences and develop personalized treatment plans for patients with colon cancer.

Novel mobilization of the medial approach without changing the position for robotic right hemicolectomy.

Conventional laparoscopic or robotic surgery for right-sided colon cancer often requires intraoperative repositioning and removal of the bowel. Changing positions during robotic surgery can be troublesome and robotic removal of the small intestine carries a risk of unexpected injury because robotic devices have a strong grasping force and no sense of touch. Herein, we introduce a novel mobilization of the medial approach without changing the position for robotic right hemicolectomy. Using this technique, mobilization is performed in counterclockwise succession, allowing all mobilizations and bowel removal to be completed sequentially, without positional change.

Overall survival comparing laparoscopic to open surgery for right-sided colon cancer: propensity score inverse probability weighting population study.

This retrospective cohort study reports on overall survival and short-term complications, comparing laparoscopic to open resection for right-sided colon cancers. It is one of the largest studies in the field with generalizable population-level results. This study on right sided colon cancers used prospectively collected administrative data linked to a death registry over 5 years from 2014 to 2018. Exclusion criteria were private patients, patients aged less than 10 years, synchronous and metachronous cancers. Propensity score weighting was used to balance cohorts and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the hazard of death. In addition, logistic regression analysis was used to assess secondary outcomes. For completeness, unweighted data was similarly analysed. There were 3603 patients identified for the analysis: 1729 open patients and 1874 laparoscopic patients. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of the weighted data showed no evidence of a statistically significant effect of laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery on overall survival for right-sided colon cancers (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71-1.04, P= 0.112). The weighted data showed lower odds of prolonged length of stay, return to theatre and discharge destination other than home in the laparoscopic cohort compared to the open cohort. There was no difference in inpatient mortality. Unweighted results were similar. This study validates the use of laparoscopic surgery for right-sided colon cancer, showing similar long-term overall survival and inpatient mortality compared to open surgery. It is superior to open surgery for the short-term outcomes of LOS, return to theatre and discharge destination other than home.

Importance of Arterial Vessel Length for Metastatic Lymph Node Retrieval and Survival in Standardized Left- and Right-Sided Colon Cancer Surgery.

We investigated the localization of lymph node metastases, and the role of arterial vessel and specimen lengths in left- and right-sided colon cancer surgery, for survival. This was a prospective cross-sectional population-based study of specimens from patients who underwent standardized surgical resection for colon cancer in 2012-2015. The mesocolon of the specimens was divided into four sections for pathological analysis of lymph nodes. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between lymph node counts and patient- and surgery-related factors. For survival analysis, a multivariable Cox regression method was used. A total of 317 patients (160 females) were included. Median (range) age was 74 (30-95) years. Median number of lymph node retrieval was 32 (8-198) and was associated with increased specimen length but not to arterial vessel length. One hundred and thirty-three (42%) patients had lymph node metastases. All patients had these located < 5cm from the tumour. Ten, two, and three specimens had lymph node metastases around the central and peripheral ligation of the ileocolic artery and at the central ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery, respectively. The tumour stages in these specimens were T3-4N2M0-1. No statistically significant survival benefit was associated with longer arterial vessel length (p = 0.429). Neither retrieval of lymph nodes nor statistically significant survival was affected by vessel length in standardized left- and right-sided colon cancer surgery.

Can Cross-Sectional Imaging Reliably Determine Pathological Staging of Right-Sided Colon Cancers and Select Patients for More Radical Surgery or Neo-Adjuvant Treatment?

Purpose and research questionCross-sectional imaging with CT scanning is the most commonly performed imaging modality to stage right-sided colon cancers. There is increasing evidence for the use of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in selected patients and debate about the role of complete mesocolic excision (CME) and central vascular ligation (CVL) in the management of locally advanced colon cancers. Predicted tumour stage and the presence of nodal metastases by CT are often used to select patients for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and those that may benefit from CME.This study aims to compare predicted radiological T and N staging with final pathological T and N staging in elective patients having potentially curative surgery for right-sided colon cancer.MethodsA retrospective analysis was carried out of a prospectively gathered database of all patients who had undergone (true) right hemicolectomy between 02/01/13 and 21/05/20. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for CT scanning with regards to the pathological nodal metastases were calculated and analysed.ResultsThe sensitivity and specificity of radiology staging for predicting nodal status were 76.4% and 65.5% respectively. The positive predictive value of CT staging for correctly identifying nodal metastases was 55.3%, with a negative predictive value of 77.3%.ConclusionsThis large series adds further evidence that CT, even when reviewed by expert GI radiologists, has limited accuracy at identifying lymph node metastases in colon cancer.

Short-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic surgery for right-sided colon cancer: A propensity score-matched study.

Recently, intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) has been attracting attention. We aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of IA and extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) in laparoscopic surgery for right-sided colon cancer, after propensity score matching. We retrospectively reviewed 404 consecutive patients with right-sided primary colon cancer between January 2019 and July 2021, 359 of whom underwent laparoscopic surgery. We classified them into IA (n=72) and EA (n=287) groups. Propensity score matching analysis was performed, and the matched groups were compared. The IA group had a longer operation time and shorter time to first flatus, passage of stool, and oral intake. There were no differences in blood loss, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay between the groups. The IA group had a higher inflammatory response in the laboratory data on postoperative day 1 compared to the EA group; however, there were no differences in the incidence of abdominal or surgical site infection (SSI). The IA group had a longer distal resection margin, and there were no peritoneal recurrences in either group. In the IA group, patients had earlier bowel recovery and a longer distal resection margin; however, other postoperative clinical outcomes were comparable. Although there was a higher postoperative inflammatory response in IA, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications, including SSI and intra-abdominal infection. Although long-term outcomes are not yet available, IA could be a useful procedure.

Charlson comorbidity index predicts anastomotic leakage in patients with resected right-sided colon cancer.

Anastomotic leakage after right-sided colon cancer surgery is a serious complication that affects postoperative mortality. The Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) has been reported to be a useful predictor of postoperative complications. A total of 593 cases of right-sided colon cancer resections performed from 2016 to 2020 were examined. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of anastomotic leakage (AL, n = 28; no-AL, n = 565); clinicopathological and surgical characteristics were compared between the groups. The AL group patients had a higher comorbidity rate (96.4% vs. 66.9%, p < 0.001), higher CCI score (p < 0.001), higher blood loss (42mL vs. 23mL, p = 0.046), and longer hospital stay (30days vs. 12days, p < 0.001) than the no-AL group patients. The percentages of chronic pulmonary disease (14.3% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.029), cerebrovascular disease (14.3% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.022), connective tissue disease (39.3% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001), leukemia (3.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.042), and moderate to severe liver disease (7.1% vs. 0%, p = 0.002) were significantly higher in the AL group. In the multivariate analysis, CCI ≥ 2 was identified as an independent predictor of postoperative anastomotic leakage (hazard ratio 4.91, 95% confidence interval 2.23-10.85, p < 0.001). CCI could predict anastomotic leakage after right-sided colon cancer surgery.

Anastomosis technique and leakage rates in minimally invasive surgery for right-sided colon cancer. A retrospective national cohort study.

The aim of this study was to describe the different techniques currently used in Denmark to construct right-sided ileocolic anastomoses in minimally invasive surgery, and investigate, compare and analyse the anastomotic configurations and their anastomotic leakage (AL) rates. This was a retrospective register-based, study design using prospectively collected data from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) database. All patients aged 18years or older with a malignant colorectal tumour in Denmark in the period of 1 February 2015 until 31 December 2019, and who had an elective, curative, minimally invasive right hemicolectomy (MIRH) with ileocolic anastomosis, were included. Three thousand three hundred ninety-eight patients were included. The most commonly used anastomotic approach was the extracorporeal (EC) hand-sewn anastomosis (HA) with end-to-end configuration (59%) and the second most used was the EC stapled anastomosis (SA) side-to-side configuration (20%). The latter had a higher AL rate compared with the hand-sewn technique (3.8% vs. 1.3%), and had significantly higher odds ratio (OR) (OR: 2.85, 95% CI: 1.56-4.92, p < 0.0001) for AL in the adjusted regression model. The least used technique was the end-to-side HA which also had a significantly higher OR (OR: 3.05, 95% CI: 1.30-7.15, p = 0.010) compared with the end-to-end HA. Smoking was an independent factor associated with higher OR for AL. The ileocolic end-to-end HA was the most commonly used technique and had the lowest AL rate in MIRH for colon cancer. The EC SA technique and tobacco smoking were independent risk factors for leakage of the ileocolic anastomosis.

Right-sided colon cancer with invasion of the duodenum or pancreas: A glimpse into our experience.

Duodenal or pancreatic invasion in locally advanced right colon cancer (LARCC) is a challenging situation that can pose difficulties in its management. When the duodenum alone is invaded, the surgeon may undertake right hemicolectomy (RH) en bloc with the affected patch of duodenum. The duodenal defect can be reconstructed using several techniques. When invasion of the pancreas is present, RH en bloc with duodenopancreatectomy (DP) is the treatment of choice. We present our experience regarding the treatment and prognostic results of this rare colon cancer form. We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who underwent surgery for right-sided colon cancer with duodenal and/or pancreatic invasion between January 2004 and March 2020. Among the 110 patients with LARCC, pancreas and/or duodenum invasion was encountered in 22 patients, with a mean age of 49.5 years. From the 22 patients, 5 patients underwent palliative procedures, with a maximal survival of 15 months. Three patients underwent RH alone, with lethal outcome in the first year in 66% of the cases. RH en bloc with antrectomy was performed in 2 patients. Eight patients underwent RH with DP, with a 1-year survival of 75% (6/8) and a 5-year survival of 50% (3/6). Thirty-day mortality post-DP was noted in 25% (2/8) of the cases. Four patients underwent RH with limited duodenal resection, with no recurrence of disease at 11 to 39 months postoperatively. Among the duodenal defect restoration, simple duodenal suture was practiced in 2 patients, duodenojejunostomy in one patient and pedicled ileal flap in 1 case. In conclusion, although postoperative mortality can be significant, en bloc resection for LARCC invading the duodenum and/or pancreas offers prolonged survival in a considerable number of patients.

The use of ultrasound in central vascular ligation during laparoscopic right-sided colon cancer surgery: technical notes.

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) requires the surgeon to sharply dissect the mesocolon and approach the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) for ligation of the supplying vessels relating to right-sided colon cancer at their origin. Even with preoperative images, it can still be challenging to identify these structures during laparoscopic surgery because of various intraoperative conditions. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) for identification of blood vessels during right-sided colon cancer surgery. We performed IOUS on 19 patients diagnosed with right-sided colon cancer at our institution, in January-October 2020. Preoperatively, a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) angiogram was obtained for the majority of patients to visualize the SMA, SMV, and their respective branches. The running position of the ileocolic artery (ICA) and right colic artery (RCA) related to the SMV and the presence of the middle colic artery were identified and compared using preoperative 3D-CT, IOUS, and intraoperative findings. Nineteen patients [seven men and 12 women with a mean age of 73.9 ± 8.4years (range 58-82years)] were studied, including some with a body mass index of > 30kg/m2, locally advanced cancer, and severe adhesion. There were IOUSs that detected the SMA, SMV, and their tributaries in all patients. The positional relationships between the SMV and the ICA and RCA revealed by IOUS were consistent with the preoperative and intraoperative findings. IOUS is a safe, feasible, and reproducible technique that can assist in detecting the branching of the SMA and SMV during CME with CVL in laparoscopic right-sided colon cancer surgery, regardless of individual conditions.

Complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy with central vascular ligation in right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review of postoperative outcomes, tumor recurrence and overall survival.

In right-sided colon cancer surgery, currently there is a great deal of discussion and debate regarding complete mesocolic excision (CME) versus conventional right hemicolectomy (CRH) on postoperative outcomes and oncological results. Our aim was to perform a systematic review of the short- and long-term outcomes of CME to standardize surgical approach in patients with right-sided colon cancer. A systematic review was performed examining available data on randomized and non-randomized studies evaluating the role of CME and D3 lymphadenectomy in the treatment of right-sided colon cancer, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards. After literature search, 919 studies have been recorded, 110 studies underwent full-text reviews and 30 studies met inclusion criteria. The total number of CME procedures was 5931. Postoperative complications was reported in 28 studies with pooled overall complications of 1.88% for CME surgery. Six studies reported 0% of overall postoperative complications and they demonstrated a low incidence of complications following CME procedure. Anastomotic leak was reported in 27 studies with pooled proportion of 0.92% after CME resections. There were 16 papers reporting overall survival following CME procedure, with a mean of 85% of patients survived at 5 years. Mean 5-year overall survival was 93.05% in stage I patients, 89.76% in stage II patients and 79.65% in stage III patients. Local and distant recurrence were included in 21 studies, reporting tumor recurrence rate of 12.25% following CME. 5-year tumor recurrence was 5.8% in stage I patients, 7.68% in stage II patients and 15.69% in stage III patients. CME does not increase the risk of postoperative complications and significantly improves the long-term oncological impact. Prospective multicentre studies results are needed to verify if CME could be considered standard surgery for right colon cancer.

Robotic complete mesocolic excision versus conventional robotic right colectomy for right-sided colon cancer: a comparative study of perioperative outcomes.

This study aims to compare the short-term outcomes of robotic complete mesocolic excision (RCME) versus conventional robotic right colectomy (RRC) for right-sided colon cancer. Consecutive patients who underwent robotic surgery for right-sided colon cancer in a public quaternary and a private tertiary healthcare centre between November 2018 and June 2020 were included. Clinical, perioperative and histopathological variables were collected and analysed. Fifty-one patients were included; 25 (49%) of them had an RCME. The groups were evenly distributed in terms of demographic characteristics and tumour location. Operative time was similar between both groups, and no patients required conversion to open surgery. There were no differences in overall complications (16% in RCME vs. 26.9% in RRC; p = 0.499) or their profile between groups. There were no anastomotic leaks recorded, and the reoperation rates were similar (0% for RCME versus 3.8% for RRC; p = 1). In addition, the median length of hospital stay was similar in between the RCME and the RRC groups (4 [4-6] days versus 5 [3-8.5] days, respectively; p = 0.891). Whilst there were no differences in the TNM staging, the mean number of lymph nodes harvested with RCME was 37.7 (±12.9) compared to 21.8 (±7.5) with RCC (p < 0.001). In our series, RCME was associated with a higher lymph node harvest and a similar morbidity profile compared to RCC. Further studies are required to validate these results and provide long-term oncologic outcomes.

Robotic complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer: short-term outcomes from a case series.

Despite conflicting data regarding oncological outcomes, studies demonstrate that complete mesocolic excision (CME) and central vascular ligation (CVL) for right-sided colon cancer removes significantly more tissue and yields higher lymph node counts when compared to conventional resection. This study aims to report the safety profile of CME and CVL in patients undergoing robotic surgery for right-sided colon cancer during the introduction of this technique across two institutions. Patients who underwent an elective robotic right colectomy with CME and CVL for right-sided colon cancer in a public quaternary and a private tertiary healthcare centre between November 2018 and April 2020 were included. Demographic, clinical, perioperative and histopathological variables were recorded and analysed. Twenty patients (13 females) with a median age of 69 (23-83) years and median body mass index of 27 (19-46) were included. All of them had a pre-operative diagnosis of right-sided colon adenocarcinoma. Median operative time and blood loss were 140 (130-300) min and 30 (20-100) mL, respectively. There were no conversions or intra-operative complications. There were two post-operative complications recorded (one ileus and one intra-abdominal collection treated with intravenous antibiotics) and no re-interventions. Median length of stay was 4 (2-8) days. All patients had an R0 resection, and the median lymph node yield was 36 (22-80) lymph nodes. This series demonstrates a safe introduction of robotic CME and CVL in patients with right-sided colon cancer. The lymph node harvest obtained with CME and CVL in this setting was high.

Propensity-score-matched analysis of short- and long-term outcomes in patients with an ileocolic artery crossing anterior vs posterior to the superior mesenteric vein during curative resection for right-sided colon cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignant diseases worldwide. However, laparoscopic lymph node dissection is technically demanding and time-consuming in right-sided colon cancer surgery because of variable vessel anatomy. We evaluated whether the ileocolic artery (ICA) crossing anterior to the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) was associated with better intraoperative parameters and survival compared with the ICA crossing posterior to the SMV, following laparoscopic curative resection for right-sided colon cancer. This was a propensity-score-matched retrospective study including data for 540 patients with right-sided colon cancer undergoing laparoscopic curative resection (299 with the ICA crossing anterior to the SMV (group A) and 241 with the ICA crossing posterior to the SMV (group B). We compared propensity-matched scores between the two groups to evaluate surgical and oncological outcomes. We found no significant difference in 5-year overall survival rates between groups for any disease stage (0-III). However, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates did differ significantly between groups (p = 0.011), especially in patients with stage III disease (p = 0.013). We then performed univariate and multivariate analyses to determine the associations between DFS and ICA location and tumor-node-metastasis (UICC) stage. ICA location and UICC stage had a poor association with DFS on univariate analysis: ICA hazard ratio (HR) 2.52, CI 1.19-5.78, p = 0.014 vs HR 3.18, CI 1.08-9.46, p = 0.03, and on multivariate analysis: HR 2.48, CI 1.17-5.69, p = 0.016 vs HR 3.86, CI 1.90-7.96, p = 0.0002. Our results showed that an ICA crossing posterior to the SMV was associated with worse DFS compared with an ICA crossing anterior to the SMV. We recommend careful laparoscopic technique in patients with an ICA crossing posterior to the SMV, during lymph node resection in right-sided colon cancer surgery.