Surgery For Remnant Gastric Cancer Research Articles

ASO Author Reflections: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Remnant Gastric Cancer.

ASO Author Reflections: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Remnant Gastric Cancer.

Advantages of minimally invasive surgery for remnant gastric cancer: A multi-institutional cohort study.

357 Background: Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is defined as a cancer arising in the remnant stomach after initial gastrectomy, regardless of the previous disease or surgical procedure. Despite growing evidence of the effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for primary gastric cancer, MIS for RGC remains controversial due to the rarity of the disease. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical and oncological outcomes of MIS for radical resection of RGC. Methods: We collected the data of patients with RGC who underwent surgery with curative intent between 2005 and 2020 from 17 institutions in Japan, and performed a propensity score (PS) matching analysis to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of MIS with open surgery. Results: A total of 327 patients were included in this study and 186 patients were analyzed after matching. The risk ratios for overall and severe complications were 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45–1.27) and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.32–1.29), respectively. The MIS group had significantly less blood loss (50 ml vs. 361 ml, P<0.001) and a shorter hospital stay (13 days vs. 16 days, P=0.009) than the open surgery group, while the operative time was longer in the MIS group (344 min vs. 273 min, P<0.001). The median follow-up duration of this cohort was 4.6 years, and the 3-year overall survival rates were 77.9% in the MIS group and 76.2% in the open surgery group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI: 0.45–1.36). The 3-year relapse-free survival rates were 71.9% in the MIS group and 62.2% in the open surgery group (HR, 0.71; 95% CI: 0.44–1.16). Locoregional recurrence occurred in three patients (3.2%) in the MIS group and four patients (4.3%) in the open surgery group. There were also no differences in the other patterns of recurrence between the groups. Conclusions: MIS for RGC showed favorable short- and long-term outcomes compared to open surgery. MIS is a promising option for radical surgery for RGC.

Postoperative Complications and Their Risk Factors of Completion Total Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer Following an Initial Gastrectomy for Cancer.

PurposeCompletion total gastrectomy (CTG) for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is a technically demanding procedure and associated with increased morbidity. The present study aimed to evaluate postoperative complications and their risk factors following surgery for RGC after initial partial gastrectomy due to gastric cancer excluding peptic ulcer.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of 107 patients who had previously undergone an initial gastric cancer surgery and subsequently underwent CTG for RGC between March 2002 and December 2020. The postoperative complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the risk factors for complications.ResultsPostoperative complications occurred in 34.6% (37/107) of the patients. Intra-abdominal abscess was the most common complication. The significant risk factors for overall complications were multi-visceral resections, longer operation time, and high estimated blood loss in the univariate analysis. The independent risk factors were multi-visceral resection (odds ratio [OR], 2.832; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.094–7.333; P=0.032) and longer operation time (OR, 1.005; 95% CI, 1.001–1.011; P=0.036) in the multivariate analysis. Previous reconstruction type, minimally invasive approach, and current stage were not associated with the overall complications.ConclusionsMulti-visceral resection and long operation time were significant risk factors for the occurrence of complications following CTG rather than the RGC stage or surgical approach. When multi-visceral resection is required, a more meticulous surgical procedure is warranted to improve the postoperative complications during CTG for RGC after an initial gastric cancer surgery.

Different risks of nodal metastasis by tumor location in remnant gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Curative surgery for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) after gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC) can be challenging. We examined the risk factors for lymph node metastasis in RGC, especially for tumors located at the greater curvature (G) or non-greater curvature (NG), to determine the appropriate indications of curative surgery. Data from the two high-volume centers of Japan between 1998 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Among the 137 patients enrolled in this study, 34 were classified as the G group and 103 as the NG group. The incidence of lymph node metastasis and its risk factors was evaluated. Lymph node metastasis was observed in 21.2% (29/137), including 38.2% (13/34) in the G group and 15.5% (16/103) in the NG group (p = 0.008). A logistic regression analysis showed that tumor location of G or NG (p = 0.042), tumor size (p = 0.002) and depth of invasion (p = 0.009) were significant independent risk factors for nodal metastasis. Risk classification using these factors showed that clinical T1-T2 with a maximum size < 35mm located at the non-greater curvature had the lowest nodal metastatic risk (4.3%). Tumor location at the G or NG was a significant risk factor for nodal metastasis in RGC. When selecting curative surgery for RGC, physicians should consider the nodal metastatic risk calculated by the tumor location, size and depth of invasion.

Clinicopathological Features of Remnant Gastric Cancer (RGC): Detection of RGC after Five Years of Follow-Up Was Associated with a Poor Prognosis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients who underwent surgery for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) during/after the regular five-year follow-up period after initial distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer that is recommended by the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines. Between January 2007 and December 2017, 40 patients underwent surgery for RGC after distal gastrectomy. Twenty-eight of the 40 patients underwent initial gastrectomy for cancer. We divided the 28 patients into two groups: patients who were diagnosed with RGC during/after the five-year follow-up period after initial gastrectomy, and analyzed their retrospectively collected data. Among the 28 patients, 15 patients were diagnosed with RGC within five years and 13 patients were diagnosed with RGC after five years. There were significant differences in the reconstruction of the initial operation, curative resection, pathological depth of the tumor, and pathological stage of the two groups. Multivariate analyses revealed that the interval between initial gastrectomy and RGC and the pathological TNM stage were significant risk factors for shorter cancer-specific survival. Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated that patients with RGC after the five-year follow-up period had a significantly worse prognosis in terms of cancer-specific survival than those who developed RGC within five years. This study suggested surveillance by using the annual endoscopy might be necessary beyond the initial five-year period for patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Remnant Gastric Cancer After Distal Gastrectomy.

Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) after distal gastrectomy occurs in 1-2% of patients, while the biological features of RGC are unknown. A total of 22 consecutive patients with RGC who underwent total gastrectomy were analyzed. Their disease history included either gastric cancer (n=16) or peptic ulcer (n=6). Overall, 18 underwent open total gastrectomy (OTG) and 4 underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). The mean number of lymph nodes dissected and metastatic lymph nodes was larger in the Ulcer group than in the Carcinoma group (p<0.005). The mean operation time was longer in the LTG than OTG (p<0.005). The median blood loss tended to be smaller in the LTG (p=0.090). Five-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates were 94% and 81%, respectively. The status of lymph node metastasis after surgery for RGC should be cautiously considered in the context of disease history. Both LTG and OTG can be treatment options for RGC.

Lymph nodes around the posterior gastric artery: their existence, frequency, and clinical implications.

The lymphatic flow along the posterior gastric artery (PGA) is considered of possible clinical importance in terms of lymphatic metastasis; however, little is known about the lymph nodes (LNs) around this artery. The purpose of this study was to establish if LNs exist around the PGA and to evaluate their clinical implications. We examined the tissues surrounding the PGA from 21 cadavers to search for LNs. We also investigated the patterns of lymphatic metastases in patients who underwent surgery for gastric neoplasms at our institute to detect their presence along the PGA. The PGA was identified in 11 cadavers, and LNs around the PGA were detected microscopically in 2 of these. Lymphatic metastasis directly to the LNs at the splenic artery without any metastases was regarded as skip metastasis along the PGA. Skip metastasis was found in two of ten patients who underwent surgery for remnant gastric cancer. The existence of LNs around the PGA was confirmed, and based on our findings, lymphatic metastasis through the PGA is possible in patients with remnant gastric cancer.

The value of N staging with the positive lymph node ratio, and splenectomy, for remnant gastric cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.

Surgery for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) frequently fails to obtain the >15 lymph nodes necessary for tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging. We aimed to evaluate the utility of the recently developed tumor-ratio-metastasis (TRM) staging system. We also examined the pattern of lymph node metastasis and the role of prophylactic splenectomy in RGC. Between May 2003 and December 2012, data from 170 patients who underwent surgery for RGC were retrospectively analyzed. RGC arising after previous benign disease (n = 46) was associated with retrieval of more lymph nodes (27.3 vs 10.0; P < 0.001), and a lower rate of retrieving ≤15 lymph nodes (15.6% vs 77.4%, P < 0.001), than after previous malignant disease (n = 122). The 5 year survival rate according to TNM staging was 75% in stage I, 77.1% in stage II, and 23.5% in stage III, whereas by TRM staging it was 75%, 81.6%, and 23.2%, respectively. Overall survival was not different between the splenectomy and non-splenectomy groups at each stage (P = 0.751, 0.723, 0.151, and 0.706 for stage I, II, III, and IV, respectively). The analyses did not identify a survival benefit from prophylactic splenectomy or show an improvement in staging with the TRM system for RGC.

Risk factors for complications during surgical treatment of remnant gastric cancer

Surgical treatment for remnant gastric cancer is related to high mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors that predispose to postoperative complications after gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer. A total of 210 patients who underwent a gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer between January 1998 and December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical complications were reviewed and graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for development of complications. The incidence of postoperative complications was 46% (96/210), and major complications occurred in 14% (30/210). The operation-related mortality rate was 1.0%. Multivariate analysis revealed that only a BMI ≥25 (P = 0.001) and blood transfusion (P < 0.001) were significant independent risk factors for major complication. Indication for the initial gastrectomy and previous anastomosis type were not related to the development of surgical complications. Although surgery for remnant gastric cancer is a complex procedure because of the previous operation, factors related to the previous operation do not affect the development of postoperative complications.

Minimally invasive surgery for remnant gastric cancer: a comparison with open surgery

Completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is technically challenging, especially using the minimally invasive approach. Only a few small case series have reported the technical feasibility of completion total gastrectomy by minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of MIS and open surgery for RGC. We retrospectively analyzed 76 completion total gastrectomies for RGC between 2005 and 2012. Indications for MIS were limited to no evidence of serosa invasion or lymph node metastasis to extraperigastric areas on preoperative evaluation. We compared patient characteristics, intraoperative factors, post-operative outcomes, and survival for the MIS and open surgery groups. Eighteen patients underwent completion total gastrectomy with MIS (10 laparoscopic, 8 robotic) and 58 patients underwent open surgery. Operation time was longer in the MIS than the open group (266 vs. 203min, P=0.004), but the groups had similar estimated blood loss, frequency of unplanned other organ resection, and number of retrieved lymph nodes. The MIS group had a significantly earlier initiation of soft diet, shorter hospital stay, and fewer pain medication injections. Complication rates, recurrence, and overall 5-year survival were similar for the two groups. When we compared laparoscopy with robotic, similar result was shown in all parameters except operation time. Compared to open surgery, MIS for RGC demonstrated better short-term outcome and comparable oncologic results. MIS for RGC is feasible and safe and maintains advantages of minimal invasiveness. Both laparoscopic and robotic approaches are reasonable to the management of RGC.

Laparoscopy-assisted Total Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer

Surgical treatment is more difficult for remnant gastric cancer than for primary gastric cancer because of adhesions to adjacent organs. Severe adhesions between the remnant stomach and the left lobe of the liver make difficult to remove the remnant stomach. Laparoscopic gastrectomy has gradually gained acceptance for the treatment of primary gastric cancer because of the potential benefits of being less invasive and having a shorter recovery time but has generally been considered contraindicated in patients who have undergone open upper abdominal surgery. However, few reports have described laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy after open or laparoscopic gastrectomy. The benefits and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for remnant gastric cancer remain unclear. We describe in detail the procedure of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer and evaluate its safety and feasibility.

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: feasibility study

The benefits and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for remnant gastric cancer are still unclear. The purpose of this study was to describe the detailed procedure and to evaluate the clinical short-term outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) compared with open total gastrectomy (OTG) for remnant gastric cancer (RGC). Of 1,247 consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer in our department at Kyushu University Hospital from January 1996 to May 2012, 22 patients who underwent successful curative resection of RGC with precise nodal dissection were enrolled in this study. Twelve patients underwent LTG and the remaining ten patients underwent OTG. We analyzed the clinical short-term outcomes of LTG and compared the results between LTG and OTG groups to evaluate the safety and feasibility of LTG. Twelve patients with RGC successfully underwent LTG without open conversion and morbidity. The mean operation time of LTG, 362.3 ± 68.4 min, was significantly longer than that of OTG (p = 0.0176), but the mean blood loss of LTG, 65.8 ± 62 g, was smaller than that of OTG (p < 0.01). The mean postoperative times to resumption of water and food intake were significantly shorter in the LTG group than in the OTG group (p < 0.01). The overall 3-year survival rate was comparable between the LTG and OTG groups (77.8 vs. 100 %; p = 0.9406). This study shows that LTG is a feasible and reliable procedure for the treatment of RGC in terms of short-term outcomes.

Clinicopathologic Analysis of Remnant Gastric Cancer after Distal Partial Gastrectomy: Experience of Single Center during 15 Years

Purpose: Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) are generally detected at advanced stages or infiltration of adjacent organs. We retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcomes and clinicopathologic results of remnant gastric cancers that have operated during fourteen years in one institution of Korea. Materials and Methods: 34 patients who were diagnosed with RGC at Ajou University Hospital from April 1995 to October 2009 were enrolled. We analyzed the features of previous operation, and according to these results, surgical outcomes and clinicopathologic results for RGC were analyzed. Results: Of 34 patients, 20 patients had previously undergone distal gastrectomy for malignant disease, and 14 patients for benign disease. The period between previous operation and surgery for RGC in the patients underwent operation for malignant disease was shorter than that in benign patients (P<0.001). In surgical field, 31 patients (91.0%) were resected and curative resection was possible in 23 patients (67.6%). When 31 patients who underwent resection for RGC were divided into previous malignant and benign disease, there was no significantly different in terms of surgical outcomes and pathologic findings between two groups. Meanwhile, the patients who recently (after 2005) underwent surgery for RGC showed less advanced stage compared with the patients who underwent surgery before 2004. Conclusions: Resection was possible in the higher proportion (91.0%) of patients diagnosed with RGC compared with previous reports. The cause of previous operation did not effect on the surgical outcomes for surgery of RGC. Recent trend of RGC is to increase the proportion of early stage gastric cancer. Therefore, surgeons should consider curatively surgical resection for RGC the regardless of pattern of previous operation.

Frequent loss of RUNX3 gene expression in remnant stomach cancer and adjacent mucosa with special reference to topography.

Our previous studies suggest that a lack of RUNX3 function is causally related to the genesis and progression of human gastric cancer. This study was conducted to determine whether alteration of RUNX3 gene expression could be detected in the normal-looking gastric remnant mucosa, and to ascertain any difference in the potential of gastric carcinogenesis between the anastomotic site and other areas in the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy for peptic ulcer (RB group) or gastric cancer (RM group), by analysing RUNX3 expression with special reference to topography. A total of 89 patients underwent distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer from the intact stomach (GCI group) and 58 patients underwent resection of the remnant stomach for gastric cancer (RB group: 34 cases, RM group: 24 cases). We detected RUNX3 and gene promoter methylation by in situ hybridisation, quantitative reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR), and methylation-specific PCR. The interval between the initial surgery and surgery for remnant gastric cancer (interval time) was 10.4 years in the RM group, and 27.5 years in the RB group. Cancers in the RB group were significantly more predominant in the anastomosis area (P<0.05). Within the tumour, downregulation of RUNX3 expression ranged from 74.7 to 85.7% in the three groups. The rate of downregulation of RUNX3 of adjacent mucosa was 39.2% (11 in 28 cases) in RB and 47.6% (10 in 21 cases) in RM, which are significantly higher than that of the GCI group (19.5%, 17 in 87 cases). In noncancerous mucosa of the remnant stomach in the RB group, RUNX3 expression decreased more near the anastomosis area. In the RM group, however, there were no significant differences in RUNX3 expression by sampling location. Based on RUNX3 downregulation and clinical features, residual stomach mucosa of the RM group would have a higher potential of gastric carcinogenesis compared to the RB or GCI group. Gastric stump mucosa of the RB group has higher potential especially than other areas of residual stomach mucosa. Measurement of RUNX3 expression and detection of RUNX3 methylation in remnant gastric mucosa may estimate the forward risk of carcinogenesis in the remnant stomach.