Surgery For Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Research Articles

Meeting actual benchmarks for short- and long-term outcomes after cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal surface malignancy at a newly established academic treatment center

BackgroundCytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is a curative treatment for selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancy. Reaching actual outcomes benchmarks is challenging given the complex nature of peritoneal surface malignancy surgery. The aim of this study was to assess how the benchmarks for morbidity and oncologic outcome can be reached at a newly established program for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. MethodsBuilding on existing institutional experience in complex abdominal surgery and interdisciplinary ovarian cancer treatment, a peritoneal surface malignancy center for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy was established at the Medical University of Vienna using a structured mentoring process. This is a retrospective analysis of the first 100 consecutive patients. Morbidity and mortality were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification, and oncologic outcomes using overall survival. ResultsMajor morbidity and mortality were 26% and 3%, and median overall survival was 49.0 months. In patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases, the median overall survival was 35.1 months (all colorectal peritoneal metastases patients) and 48.8 months in the subgroup with Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score ≤3. No median overall survival could be calculated in patients with low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms, appendiceal adenocarcinoma, or peritoneal mesothelioma due to >50% of patients being alive at the end of follow-up. ConclusionWe show that the current morbidity and oncological outcomes benchmarks can be reached within the first 100 cases of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy at a newly established peritoneal surface malignancy center. Previous institutional experience in complex abdominal surgery and a structured mentoring process are key factors in achieving this goal.

Morbimortality after 1321 consecutive CRS + HIPEC procedures: seeking excellence in surgery for peritoneal surface malignancy.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) treatment has classically presented a percentage of associated complications that have limited its expansion. The aim of this study is to describe the morbimortality results obtained from a referral center implemented with the support of a governmental health agency and directed by a surgical team experienced in CRS for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (PSM). Data from the Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Program of Catalonia (PCPC) prospective database, including patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC between September 2006 and January 2021, were analyzed. A total of 1151 consecutive patients underwent 1321 CRS + HIPEC procedures. Colonic origin of peritoneal metastasis was the most frequent (47.3%). Median PCI was 7 and most patients had CC0-1 (96.1%). Multivisceral resection was performed in 44% of all patients, 57% required digestive anastomosis. Median hospital stay was 11days (range 6-144days). High-grade complications occurred in 20% of all patient, most of them surgical complications. Anastomotic leak occurred in 0.6% of all cases. The overall in-stay and 30-day mortality rate was 0.4%. The low-rate of complications and the high rate of complete CRS were achieved from the beginning of the PCPC. Median overall survival was 54.7months, with a 5-year survival rate of 47.5%. Implementation of a CRS + HIPEC referral program for the treatment of PSM with preferably an experienced surgical team enables acceptable rates of severe morbidity (20%) and mortality (< 1%).

A multi-institutional analysis of Textbook Outcomes among patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal surface malignancies

BackgroundWhile recent studies have introduced the composite measure of a textbook outcome (TO) for measuring postoperative outcomes, the incidence of a TO has not been characterized among patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM). Study designAll patients who underwent CRS ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) between 1999 and 2017 from 12 institutions were included. A TO was defined as the absence of any of the following criteria: completeness of cytoreduction >1, reoperation within 90-days, readmission within 90-days, mortality within 90-days, any grade ≥2 complication, hospital stay >75th percentile, and non-home discharge. ResultsAmong 1904 patients who underwent CRS, only 30.9% achieved a TO while 69.1% failed to achieve a TO most commonly because of postoperative complications. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with achieving a TO were age <65 years (OR: 1.5), albumin ≥3.5 g/dl (OR: 5.7), receipt of HIPEC (OR: 4.5), PCI ≤14 (OR: 2.2), intravenous fluid volume ≤10,000 ml (OR: 2.1), blood loss ≤1000 ml (OR: 4.2) and operative time <7 h (OR: 1.9); while receipt of neoadjuvant therapy (OR: 0.7) and liver resection (OR: 0.4) were associated with not achieving a TO (all p < 0.05). TO was associated with improved overall survival (median 159 months vs 56 months, p < 0.01) even after controlling for confounders on Cox regression (hazard ratio: 2.5, p < 0.01). ConclusionAmong patients undergoing CRS ± HIPEC for PSM, failure to achieve a TO is common and independently associated with worse overall survival.

Postoperative hyperglycemia in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC: A cohort study

BackgroundHyperglycemia following elective or emergency surgery is generally associated with an increased risk of complications. The impact of hyperglycemia following surgery for peritoneal surface malignancy remains unclear. Materials and methodsRecords of patients undergoing cytoreduction and HIPEC for peritoneal surface malignancy were reviewed at two institutions. Postoperative hyperglycemia was defined as serum glucose >140 mg/dl at the first measurement after surgery. Lengths of stay and 30-day complication rates were recorded. ResultsThere were 115 total patients included, 65 from Institution A (A) and 50 from Institution B (B). Perioperative steroids were given to 55% (A) and 100% (B) of patients, with postoperative hyperglycemia present in 39% and 86% of patients respectively. Complication rates were not significantly different in patients with hyperglycemia versus patients who were normoglycemic at each site [56% vs. 53%, p = 0.8 at (A); 47% vs. 43%, p = 1.0 at (B)]. Infection rates were also similar between groups [16% vs. 13%, p = 0.72 at (A); 14% vs. 29%, p = 0.31 at (B)]. ConclusionsRates of hyperglycemia in patients undergoing cytoreduction and HIPEC are high. This likely represents a stress response but does not seem to have the same adverse impact as seen in other abdominal surgical patient populations.

Advances in surgery for peritoneal surface malignancies

Abstract Currently, patients with isolated peritoneal surface malignancies are treated with a combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). This combination should now be considered the standard of care for appendiceal cancers (including pseudomyxoma), colorectal cancer and peritoneal mesothelioma, while patients with peritoneal metastases from ovarian or gastric cancer may be treated within clinical trials. At present, 8 clinical centres in Poland perform CRS and HIPEC. The unanswered problems of combined intraperitoneal therapy were an impulse for the organization of the 4th International Conference “Advances in Surgical Oncology” that was held on November 23-24, 2017, in Lublin (Poland), and the Polish chapter of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) was established as a result of this meeting. This special issue of the Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences is dedicated to the current therapeutic difficulties discussed during the two days of the conference – experiences that were exchanged to set in motion further directions for the improvement of intraperitoneal treatment.

Selection Criteria for Complete Cytoreduction after Cytoreductive Surgery for Peritoneal Surface Malignancy: Lessons Learned from Our First Series of Patients

The appropriate selection criteria for complete cytoreduction in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies have not been determined. We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients receiving cytoreductive surgery (CRS) during the study period of 2004 to 2008 to determine appropriate selection criteria for successful complete cytoreduction. During the study period, 38 patients underwent attempted CRS. Cytoreduction was scored complete, incomplete, or not reported in 53 per cent (n = 20), 37 per cent (n = 14), and 11 per cent (n = 4), respectively. Median overall survival for compete and incomplete cytoreduction was 56 months versus 5 months (P = 0.011), respectively. Compared with incomplete cytoreduction, patients receiving complete cytoreduction were more likely to have a lower Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and not have received preoperative systemic chemotherapy (CT). Univariate analysis verified PCI greater than 20 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.048; CI, 0.004 to 0.515; P = 0.01) and CT (HR, 0.17; 0.004 to 0.77; P = 0.021) as predictors of incomplete cytoreduction. Small bowel (100%), periportal region (33%), and mesentery (27%) were the most common sites of residual disease. In conclusion, PCI less than 20 and the need for preoperative chemotherapy should be strongly considered when selecting patients with peritoneal surface malignancy for attempted cytoreduction. Early evaluation of the small bowel, mesentery, and periportal region for resectability prevents unnecessary surgery.

Postoperative residual disease evaluation in the locoregional treatment of peritoneal surface malignancy

The maximum size of the residual lesions left behind after cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal surface malignancy has consistently been shown to be the main prognostic factor in this setting. However, a uniform assessment method and categorization for this paramount prognostic indicator is lacking. In order to achieve a consensus among experts, the Delphi methodology was employed. Conflicting points were identified and related multiple choice questions were circulated among a panel of experts on peritoneal surface oncology. Two rounds of web-based voting were carried out. The completeness of cytoreduction (CC) Score described by Sugarbaker was considered the current best classification for residual disease size. The experienced surgeon's naked-eye estimation was considered the ideal method to assess residual disease size. There was agreement that the definition of CC-0 or R0 cytoreduction needs further specification. A redefinition of "completeness of cytoreduction" according to disease process was favored by the experts but not favored for the type of intraperitoneal chemotherapy employed. Following the experts' consensus, it is recommended that the CC score be used to categorize residual disease after cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal surface malignancy. Pending issues for further consensus development in this area have been identified.