Lung Cancer Surgery In Patients Research Articles

Effects of mindful breathing training combined with diary-based rehabilitation guidance in lung cancer patients undergoing surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Background and purposeLung cancer surgery patients experience severe physical and mental symptoms, which seriously affect their quality of life and prognosis. Mindful breathing training is a promising strategy to improve their symptoms, but its effectiveness is affected by training compliance, and diary-based rehabilitation instruction has been shown to help improve training compliance. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of mindful breathing training combined with diary-based rehabilitation guidance on improving perioperative outcomes in lung cancer surgery patients. Materials and methodsThis single-center, assessor-blinded, prospective, three-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted from November 1, 2021 to November 1, 2022. Patients diagnosed with primary non-small cell lung cancer and scheduled for thoracoscopic surgery were randomly allocated to the combined intervention group, the mindful breathing group or the control group, with 34 patients in each group. The control group received routine care, while the mindful breathing group received mindful breathing training and routine care. The combined intervention group received both mindful breathing training and diary-based rehabilitation guidance, along with routine care. ResultsThe per-protocol analysis revealed that patients in the mindful breathing group experienced statistically significant improvements in dyspnea, fatigue and anxiety. Patients in the combined intervention group had statistically significant improvements in dyspnea, fatigue, anxiety, depression, exercise self-efficacy and training compliance. ConclusionThis study provides evidence that mindful breathing training combined with diary-based rehabilitation guidance can be effective in improving perioperative outcomes in lung cancer patients. It can be applied in clinical practice in the future.

Safety of Perioperative Maintenance of Antiplatelet Agents in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Surgery.

The maintenance of antiplatelet therapy increases the risk of bleeding during lung cancer surgery. Conversely, the perioperative interruption of antiplatelet therapy may result in serious thrombotic complications. This study aimed to investigate the safety of continuing antiplatelet therapy in the context of lung cancer surgery. We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 498 elderly patients who underwent surgery for lung cancer. These patients were categorized into 2 groups: group N, which did not receive antiplatelet therapy, and group A, which did. Group A was subsequently subdivided into group Am, where antiplatelet therapy was maintained, and group Ai, where antiplatelet therapy was interrupted. We compared the incidence of bleeding-related and thrombotic complications across the 3 groups. There were 387 patients in group N and 101 patients in group A (Ai: 70, Am: 31). No significant differences were found in intraoperative blood loss, thoracotomy conversion rates, transfusion requirements, volume of chest tube drainage, or reoperation rates for bleeding control between groups N and A or between groups Am and Ai. The duration of hospital stay was longer for group A compared to group N (7 days vs. 6 days, p=0.005), but there was no significant difference between groups Ai and Am. The incidence of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular complications did not differ significantly between groups Ai and Am. However, group Ai included a severe case of in-hospital ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The maintenance of antiplatelet therapy was found to be safe in terms of perioperative bleeding and thrombotic complications in elderly lung cancer surgery patients.

Clinic information, pathological, and imaging characteristics in 2 058 surgical patients with lung cancer from a single center.

Lung cancer is characterized by its high incidence and case fatality rate. Factors related to population composition and cancer prevention programme policy have an effect on the incidence and diagnosis of lung cancer. This study aims to provide scientific support for early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer by investigating the clinic information, pathological, and imaging characteristics of surgical patients with lung cancer. The data of 2 058 patients, who underwent surgery for lung cancer in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from 2016 to 2019, were retrospectively collected to analyze changes in clinic information, pathological, and imaging characteristics. From 2016 to 2019, the number of patients per year was 280, 376, 524, and 878, respectively. Adenocarcinoma (68.1%) was the most common pathological type of surgical patients with lung cancer. From 2016 to 2019, the proportion of adenocarcinoma was increased from 55.5% to 74.1%. The proportion lung cancer patients in stage IA was increased from 38.9% to 62.3%, and the proportion of patients who underwent sublobar resection was increased from 1.8% to 8.6%. The proportion of lymph node sampling was increased in 2019. Compared with the rate in 2016, the detection rate of nodules with diameter≤1 cm detected by CT before surgery in 2019 was significantly improved (2.0% vs 18.2%), and the detection rate of nodules with diameter>3 cm was decreased (34.7% vs 18.3%). From 2016 to 2019, the proportion of lesions with pure ground-glass density and partial solid density detected by CT was increased from 2.0% and 16.6% to 20.0% and 37.3%, respectively. The proportion of solid density was decreased from 81.4% to 42.7%. The number of lung cancer surgery patients is rapidly increasing year by year, the proportion of CT-detected purely ground-glass density and partially solid density lesions are increasing, the proportion of patients with adenocarcinoma is rising, the proportion of early-stage lung cancer is increasing, smaller lung cancers are detected in earlier clinical stage leading to a more minimally invasive approach to the surgical methods.

Effects of thoracoscopic lobectomy on surgical wound infection in patients with lung cancer: A meta‐analysis

AbstractThis meta‐analysis systematically evaluates the impact of thoracoscopic lobectomy on wound infection and complications in lung cancer patients. An extensive computerized search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases for studies comparing thoracoscopic lobectomy with open thoracotomy in the treatment of lung cancer, covering the period up to September 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the quality according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software. Ultimately, 21 studies involving 2118 lung cancer surgery patients were included. The analysis revealed that thoracoscopic lobectomy significantly reduced the incidence of wound infections (odds ratio [OR] = 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13–0.37, p < 0.001) and complications (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.21–0.36, p < 0.001) in lung cancer surgery patients, and also significantly shortened hospital stays (standardized mean difference = −2.07, 95% CI: −2.39 to −1.76, p < 0.001). This study indicates that compared with conventional open thoracotomy, thoracoscopic lobectomy in the treatment of lung cancer reduces the incidence of wound infections and complications and shortens hospital stays, demonstrating significant therapeutic efficacy and warranting broader clinical application.

Effects of accelerated rehabilitation surgical care on the surgical site wound infection and postoperative complications in patients of lung cancer: A meta-analysis.

To comprehensively evaluate the effect of accelerated rehabilitation surgical care on perioperative wound infections and complications in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. A comprehensive computerised search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of accelerated rehabilitative surgical care applied to patients undergoing lung cancer surgery was conducted using the Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Wanfang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases from inception to September 2023. The literature was screened and evaluated by two investigators, and data were extracted from the final included literature. Stata software (version 17.0) was used for data analysis. Overall, 21 RCTs involving 2187 patients were included, including 1093 cases in the accelerated rehabilitation surgical care group and 1094 cases in the conventional care group. The analyses revealed that patients with lung cancer surgery who implemented accelerated rehabilitation surgical care were significantly less likely to develop postoperative wound infections (odds ratio [OR] = 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.49, p < 0.001) and postoperative complications (OR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.20-0.34, p < 0.001) and shortened the hospital length of stay (standardised mean differences [SMD] = -1.93, 95% CI: -2.32 to -1.53, and p < 0.001) compared with conventional care. The effect of accelerated rehabilitation surgical care intervention in the perioperative period of lung cancer surgery patients is remarkable, as it can effectively reduce the incidence of wound infection and complications, shorten hospitalisation time and promote patient recovery.

Thoracic day surgery versus thoracic inpatient surgery for treatment of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe successful implementation of the Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept in thoracic surgery has made it possible to complete the surgery in the day surgery unit. However, it is still unclear whether day surgery for lung cancer patients can achieve the same or even better results.MethodsA systematic literature search was completed in common databases for studies published before May 2022 and the data analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 software.ResultsWe ultimately included 7 retrospective articles that met our criteria for the study. The results of age, smoking status, comorbidity and pulmonary function tests in day surgery group were better than in inpatient surgery group. Minimally invasive surgical method with segmentectomy was more used in day surgery group than in normal surgery group. The 30-day mortality was also lower in Day surgery group and it displayed that early discharged patients had fewer overall complications than the inpatient surgery group.ConclusionsWe demonstrate that younger patients, patients receiving segmental resections by VATS, and those with better pulmonary function tests or without comorbidity can be discharged early with low rates of complications and 30-day mortality, especial with ERAS program.

Outcomes in Incidentally Versus Screening Detected Stage I Lung Cancer Surgery Patients

IntroductionAlthough the importance of lung cancer screening for early diagnosis is established, because of poor enrollment, incidental findings still play a role in diagnosis of patients who qualify. Nevertheless, analysis of this incidental cohort is lacking. We present a retrospective analysis comparing patients with thoracic surgery with incidental versus screening detected stage I lung cancer. MethodsThoracic surgery cases at Mount Sinai Hospital from March, 1, 2012, to June, 30, 2022, were queried for patients eligible for lung cancer screening and a stage I diagnosis. The basis of lung nodule detection (incidental versus screening detected) was identified. We compared demographic variables, comorbidities, tumor staging, procedure details, and postoperative outcomes between the cohorts. ResultsOf the patients eligible for screening with lung cancer resection and stage I diagnosis at Mount Sinai, 153 were identified incidentally and 67 through screening. The patients in the incidental cohort were older (p = 0.005), more likely to have quit smoking (p = 0.04), and had a greater number of comorbidities (p = 0.0002). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to pack-year smoking history, lung cancer histological type, location or size of tumor, and surgical approach, length of surgery or stay, number of postoperative outcomes, and survival. ConclusionsIn stage I lung cancers, no significant differences were identified between incidentally and screening detected lung nodules with regard to tumor characteristics, surgical approach, and postoperative outcomes. Imaging conducted for other reasons should be considered as a valid and important diagnostic tool, similar to traditional low-dose computed tomography, in patients who qualify for screening.

Social determinants of health and lung cancer surgery: a qualitative study.

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are non-clinical factors that may affect the outcomes of cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to describe the influence of SDOH factors on quality of life (QOL)-related outcomes for lung cancer surgery patients. Thirteen patients enrolled in a randomized trial of a dyadic self-management intervention were invited and agreed to participate in semi-structured key informant interviews at study completion (3 months post-discharge). A conventional content analysis approach was used to identify codes and themes that were derived from the interviews. Independent investigators coded the qualitative data, which were subsequently confirmed by a second group of independent investigators. Themes were finalized, and discrepancies were reviewed and resolved. Six themes, each with several subthemes, emerged. Overall, most participants were knowledgeable about the concept of SDOH and perceived that provider awareness of SDOH information was important for the delivery of comprehensive care in surgery. Some participants described financial challenges during treatment that were exacerbated by their cancer diagnosis and resulted in stress and poor QOL. The perceived impact of education varied and included its importance in navigating the healthcare system, decision-making on health behaviors, and more economic mobility opportunities. Some participants experienced barriers to accessing healthcare due to insurance coverage, travel burden, and the fear of losing quality insurance coverage due to retirement. Neighborhood and built environment factors such as safety, air quality, access to green space, and other environmental factors were perceived as important to QOL. Social support through families/friends and spiritual/religious communities was perceived as important to postoperative recovery. Among lung cancer surgery patients, SDOH factors can impact QOL and the patient's survivorship journey. Importantly, SDOH should be assessed routinely to identify patients with unmet needs across the five domains. SDOH-driven interventions are needed to address these unmet needs and to improve the QOL and quality of care for lung cancer surgery patients.

P1.16-04 Differences in Incidentally Detected Versus Screening Detected Stage I Lung Cancer Surgery Patients

P1.16-04 Differences in Incidentally Detected Versus Screening Detected Stage I Lung Cancer Surgery Patients

P2.25-01 Geriatric Assessment in Lung Cancer Surgery Patients and Caregivers

P2.25-01 Geriatric Assessment in Lung Cancer Surgery Patients and Caregivers

P2.25-04 Unmet Social Needs and Spiritual Well-Being of Lung Cancer Surgery Patients and Family Caregivers from the United States

P2.25-04 Unmet Social Needs and Spiritual Well-Being of Lung Cancer Surgery Patients and Family Caregivers from the United States

Differential Outcomes of VATS and Open Surgery in Lung Cancer Patients with Antecedent Oncological Diagnoses.

Primary lung cancer is a devastating disease with high morbidity and mortality rates. Patients with a previous oncological history may present with multiple comorbidities, unique clinical features, and unique outcomes after surgical intervention for primary lung cancer. This study aimed to compare the clinical features and outcomes of patients with a previous oncological history who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or open surgery (OS) for primary lung cancer. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 84 patients with a previous oncological history who underwent surgical intervention for primary lung cancer between January 2018 and January 2023. Among them, 55 patients underwent VATS, while 29 patients underwent OS. Demographic and clinical characteristics, perioperative variables, and postoperative outcomes of the two surgical groups were collected and compared. Most of the 84 patients were women (58.4%) with a high smoking prevalence (44.1%) and a median of 32.3 packs-year. The patients' histories were most predominant for gynecologic cancers (44.4%) and colorectal cancers (18.6%). The results showed that the VATS group had a significantly shorter median hospital stay than the OS group (6.0 days vs. 12.0 days, p-value < 0.001). Additionally, the VATS group had lower incidences of air leaks 24 h post-surgery (12.7% vs. 48.3%, p-value < 0.001) and intractable pain (3.6% vs. 17.2%, p-value = 0.031), as well as significantly lower operative times (270 min vs. 350 min, p-value = 0.046). However, there were no significant differences between the VATS and OS groups in overall survival (log-rank p-value = 0.447). Furthermore, although the 3-month survival was significantly higher in the VATS group (98.2% vs. 79.3%, p-value = 0.003), only one patient from the VATS group (1.8%) and two patients from the OS group (6.9%) were still alive five years after the intervention. In conclusion, VATS is a safe and effective surgical option for patients with a previous oncological history who require surgical intervention for primary lung cancer, with shorter operative times, shorter hospital stays, and lower rates of complications compared to those of OS patients, without compromising oncological outcomes. Nevertheless, both surgical options failed to improve the 5-year survival rate, probably due to the high prevalence of comorbidities and the burden of previous cancer in this population.

Comparison of transfusion rates between robotic- and video-assisted lobectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.

The objective is to compare the perioperative blood transfusion rate and postoperative complications between robot-assisted surgery and thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer patients. This is a single-center retrospective study. Patients underwent lung cancer minimally invasive resection at Fujian Cancer Hospital from April 1, 2022, to April 30, 2023, were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into robotic-assisted lobectomy (RAL) and video-assisted lobectomy (VAL) groups according to the surgical methods. Data, including demographics, clinic variables, and endpoint outcomes were collected from the electronic medical record. Propensity score matching(PSM) was performed to analyze the baseline data of patients. The RAL group and the VAL group were matched 1:1. Then, the blood transfusion rates and short-term outcomes of the two groups were compared. A logistic regression was performed to analyze the independent risk factors of perioperative blood transfusion. A total of 558 patients were enrolled in this study. 166 of 558 patients were divided into the RAL group, and 392 patients were into the VAL group. A total of 118 patients were selected and analyzed following propensity score matching. After PSM, there was no difference in perioperative transfusion rates, including RBC transfusion and frozen plasma transfusion, between the VAL and RAL groups (P > 0.05). TheRAL group had fewer days of drainage tubes (P = 0.036). There was no difference in other short-term outcomes, including the volume of thoracic drainage, the volume of intraoperative blood loss, the length of hospitalization, and the rate of postoperative pulmonary infection (P > 0.05). Volume of intraoperative blood loss, volume of thoracic drainage, and preoperative hemoglobin were independent risk factors of perioperative red blood cell or frozen plasma transfusion; however, RAL or VAL was not. The study showed that the rates of perioperative blood transfusion were comparable between RAL and VAL. RAL is superior for patient recovery in terms of short-term outcomes.

Development and Validation of the Missed Nursing Care Tool for Pre-Operative Patients with Lung Cancer in China.

Current research suggests that missed nursing care is widespread in preoperative lung cancer patients in China, and preoperative airway management nursing care for lung cancer patients is not standardized. Missed nursing care for preoperative lung cancer patients, on the other hand, is rarely investigated, particularly from the patient's perspective. This study aimed to develop and validate the MISSCARE Survey for pre-operative patients with lung cancer in China. This study generated the preliminary draft of the MISSCARE Survey - Lung Cancer Patient (MS-LCP) and tested its reliability and stability through three rounds of lung cancer resection (494, 50, and 309 cases, respectively). 20 patients and 6 experts determined the face and content validity. EFA and CFA assessed construct and convergent validity. Internal consistency, including Cronbach's alpha, Spearman-Brown reliability, and re-test reliability, was also examined. The scale contained 15 items, including specific care, communicative care, timely care, and basic care. KMO was 0.932 (> 0.6), and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity showed P = 0.000 (<0.05). The attribution factor's item loads ranged from 0.765 to 0.853, accounting for 82.20% of the variation. The scale's Cronbach's alpha, Spearman-Brown, and retest reliability were 0.945, 0.879, and 0.824. CFA showed goodness of fit (RMSEA = 0.021, χ2/df = 1.138, GFI = 0.900, AGFI = 0.945, CFI = 0.996, NFI = 0.967, IFI = 0.996). For each dimension, AVE ranged from 0.555 to 0.717 (>0.50) and CR from 0.861 to 0.904 (>0.70). The MS-LCP was reliable and valid in this study, making it appropriate for the Chinese lung cancer patient population. This tool is more objective in its presentation of missed nursing care, assisting nursing staff in optimizing nursing procedures before surgery, increasing the implementation of higher-quality tumor care, and promoting the recovery of lung cancer surgery patients.

Enhanced recovery of postoperative nursing for single-port thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer patients.

Lung cancer is a common clinical malignant tumor, and the number of new lung cancer patients is increasing year by year. With the advancement of thoracoscopy technology and equipment, the scope of application of minimally invasive surgery has expanded to almost all types of lung cancer resection, making it the mainstream lung cancer resection surgery. Single-port thoracoscopic surgery provides evident advantages in terms of postoperative incision pain since only a single incision is required, and the surgical effect is similar to those of multi-hole thoracoscopic surgery and traditional thoracotomy. Although thoracoscopic surgery can effectively remove tumors, it nevertheless induces variable degrees of stress in lung cancer patients, which eventually limit lung function recovery. Rapid rehabilitation surgery can actively improve the prognosis of patients with different types of cancer and promote early recovery. This article reviews the research progress on rapid rehabilitation nursing in single-port thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.

Clinical role of serum tumor markers SCC, NSE, CA 125, CA 19-9, and CYFRA 21-1 in patients with lung cancer.

The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic value of tumor markers in discriminating between lung cancer and benign chest diseases (BCDs). There were 322 patients enrolled in this investigation including 180 cases of lung cancer and 142 cases of BCD. Serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE), cancer antigen 125, cancer antigen 19-9, squamous cell carcinoma-related antigen, and cytokeratin fragment19 (CYFRA 21-1) were compared between different populations, cancer stages, and before and after treatment. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic markers. Both NSE and CYFRA 21-1 were significantly associated with lung cancer. The CYFRA 21-1 showed the best performance, as well as its combinations, for lung cancer diagnosis. It also showed significant change 6 months after radical surgery in lung cancer patients. The marker CYFRA 21-1 could be developed as an adjuvant marker for the early diagnosis of lung cancer and as a prognostic marker for lung cancer treatment.

Early ambulation and postoperative recovery of patients with lung cancer under thoracoscopic surgery—an observational study

BackgroundEnhanced recovery after surgery guidelines in China recommend early ambulation within 24 h after surgery. The aims of this audit were to investigate the early ambulation of patients with lung cancer under thoracoscopic surgery, and to explore the influence of different ambulation time on postoperative rehabilitation of patients.MethodsUsing observational study method, observe and record of 226 cases under the thoracoscope surgery early ambulation of patients with lung cancer. Data collected included postoperative bowel movements, chest tube extubation time, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain and the incidence of postoperative complications.ResultsThe time of first ambulation was (34.18 ± 17.18) h, the duration was (8.26 ± 4.62) min, and the distance was (54.94 ± 46.06) m. The time of first postoperative defecation, the time of chest tube extubation and the length of hospital stay were significantly shortened in patients who ambulate within 24 h, and the pain score on the third day after surgery was decreased, and the incidence of postoperative complications was reduced, with statistical significance (P < 0.05).ConclusionEarly ambulation within 24 h after thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer patients can promote the recovery of intestinal function, early removal of chest tube, shorten the length of hospital stay, relieve pain, reduce the incidence of complications, and facilitate the rapid recovery of patients.

Is Nutritional Monitoring Effective For Lung Cancer Surgery Patients?

Is Nutritional Monitoring Effective For Lung Cancer Surgery Patients?

Diet as a Factor Supporting Lung Cancer Treatment—A Systematic Review

The purpose of this study was to summarize the evidence from epidemiological studies concerning associations between diet and the effectiveness of treatment for lung cancer. For this review, a literature search has been conducted in the EMBASE and PubMed databases, including papers published between 1977 and June 2022. The term "lung cancer" was used in conjunction with "diet". Footnotes from the selected papers were also analyzed. The present study is in line with the recommendations included in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The review included studies involving adults, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort and observational studies. In total, 863 papers were found, with duplicates excluded. Ultimately, 20 papers were reviewed. The present systematic review indicates that vitamin A, ascorbic acid (vitamin C), vitamin E, selenium, and zinc-as antioxidants-can strengthen the body's antioxidant barrier. Furthermore, preoperative immunonutrition may not only improve perioperative nutritional status following induction chemoradiotherapy in lung cancer surgery patients but also reduce the severity of postoperative complications. Similarly, a protein supply may exert a beneficial effect on human health by increasing average body weight and muscle mass. Omega-3 fatty acid content in the diet and the consumption of their main source, fish, may have some regulatory effect on inflammation in patients with lung cancer treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In addition, n-3 fatty acids inhibit tumor cell proliferation and may reduce the toxicity of chemotherapy. Increased energy and protein intake are strongly associated with improved quality of life, functional outcomes, hand grip strength, symptoms, and performance in patients with lung cancer. The use of a supportive diet should be the standard of care, alongside pharmaceutical therapy, in treatment for patients with lung cancer.

Multi-level analysis and evaluation of organizational improvements in thoracic surgery according to a Value-Based HealthCare approach.

Value-Based HealthCare (VBHC), designed by Harvard University, is an evolving model of healthcare delivery that achieves better patient outcomes and greater financial sustainability for the healthcare professionals. According to this innovative approach, the value is determined by a panel of indicators and the ratio between results and costs. Our goal was to develop a panel of thoracic-fashioned key-performance indicators (KPIs) creating a model that could be applied in thoracic surgery for the first time, reporting our early experience. Fifty-five indicators were developed based on literature review: 37 for outcomes and 18 for costs. Outcomes were measured by a 7 level Likert scale, while overall costs were defined through the sum of the individual economic performance on each resource indicator. An observational retrospective cross-sectional study was designed to make a cost-effective evaluation of the indicators. Therefore, the Patient Value in Thoracic Surgery (PVTS) score calculated value gained for every lung cancer patient undergoing lung resection at our surgical department. A total of 552 patients were enrolled. From 2017 to 2019 mean outcome indicators per patient were 109, 113 and 110 while mean costs per patient were 7.370, 7.536 and 7.313 euros respectively. Hospital stay and waiting time from consultation to surgery for lung cancer patients decreased from 7.3 to 5 and from 25.2 to 21.9 days, respectively. On the contrary, number of patients increased but overall costs decreased, despite cost of consumables has gone from 2.314 to 3.438 euros, since cost of hospitalization and occupancy of the operating room (OR) improved (from 4.288 to 3.158 euros). Variables analyzed showed that overall value delivered grew from 14.8 to 15. Introducing a new concept of value, the VBHC theory applied to thoracic surgery may revolutionize traditional organizational management in lung cancer patients, showing how value delivered can increase in accordance with outcomes, despite the growth of part of the costs. Our panel of indicators has been created to provide an innovative score to successfully identify improvements needed and quantify their effectiveness in Thoracic Surgery and our early experience reports encouraging results.