Surgery For Endometriosis Research Articles

Revolutionizing endometriosis treatment: automated surgical operation through artificial intelligence and robotic vision.

Clinical limitations due to poverty significantly impact the lives and health of many individuals globally. Nevertheless, this challenge can be addressed with modern technologies, particularly through robotics and artificial intelligence. This study aims to address these challenges using advanced technologies in robotic surgery and artificial intelligence, proposing a method to fully automate endometriosis robotic surgery with a focus on interpretability, accuracy, and reliability. A methodology for fully automatic endometriosis surgery is introduced. Given the complexity of endometriosis lesions detection, they are categorized by their anatomical location to improve system interpretability. Then, three ensemble U-Net frameworks are designed to detect and localize common types of endometriosis lesions intraoperatively. A cross-training approach is employed, exploring U-Net models with diverse neural architectures-such as ResNet50, ResNet101, VGG19, InceptionV3, MobileNet, and EfficientNetB7-to develop U-Net ensemble models for precise endometriosis lesions segmentation. A novel image augmentation technique is also introduced, enhancing the segmentation models' accuracy and reliability. Furthermore, two U-Net models are developed to localize the ovaries and uterus, mitigating unexpected noise and bolstering the method's accuracy and reliability. The image segmentation models, assessed using the Intersection over Union (IoU) metric, achieved outstanding results: 97.57% for ovarian, 96.35% for uterine, and 92.58% for peritoneal endometriosis. This study proposes a fully automatic method for some common types of endometriosis surgery, including ovarian endometriomas and superficial endometriosis. This method is centered around three ensemble U-Net frameworks and a noise reduction technique using two additional U-Nets for localizing the ovaries and uterus. This approach has the potential to significantly improve the accuracy and reliability of robotic surgeries, potentially reducing healthcare costs and improving outcomes for patients worldwide.

Self-Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Gel for Adhesion Prophylaxis in Laparoscopic Deep Endometriosis Removal: Safety Report of a Prospective Pilot Study

Background/Objectives: Surgical removal of deep endometriosis lesions is an established method of reducing patient symptoms, but it often results in iatrogenic adhesions that lead to further problems. This pilot study presents the safety evaluation of a novel self-cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel used to reduce adhesions after non-bowel deep endometriosis surgery. Methods: A single cohort, single-center, non-randomized pilot study was conducted in patients diagnosed with non-bowel deep endometriosis who underwent a three-stage treatment regimen consisting of first surgery, hormone therapy and second surgery. The present report is limited to an analysis of the inflammatory parameters, pain and complications occurring within a 72 h period following the initial laparoscopy (FLL) utilizing the anti-adhesion gel. Results: 60 patients (28.48 ± 5.9 years old) were included. 24 h after the intervention, a slight elevation in C-reactive protein levels was observed in 38.33% of cases (0.98 ± 1.46 mg/dL), with a statistically significant difference after FLL (0.98 ± 1.46 mg/dL before FLL vs. 1.03 ± 1.29 mg/dL after FLL; p =< 0.001); there were no patients with levels above 10 mg/dL before or after surgery. 24 h after FLL, 29.33% of patients had a leukocyte count greater than 11 Thous/μL, with a maximum observed value of 16.2 Thous/μL. The count was found to be statistically significantly higher after FLL (6.03 ± 1.91 Thous/μL before FLL vs. 9.15 ± 2.61 Thous/μL after FLL; p =< 0.001). At 72 h post-intervention, postoperative pain was reported in up to 63.33% of cases, and one urinary tract infection with fever occurred but was not considered to be related to the product. No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusions: The results of this exploratory study showed a safe range of inflammatory response within a 24 h period following the application of the novel self-cross-linked hyaluronic acid antiadhesion gel (HyaRegen®) in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for non-bowel deep endometriosis.

Pentraxin-3 is a novel marker for the diagnosis of endometriosis

Introduction: Endometriosis is one of the most common reproductive disorders affecting women. The pathophysiology of endometriosis is also quite complicated, and many mechanisms have been put forward. Pentraxin-3 is a glycoprotein released by leukocyte and myeloid dendritic cells in peripheral blood with the stimulation of some cytokines, especially IL-1 and TNF-α, Toll-Like Receptor agonists, or microbial components. It has been shown that pentraxin-3 is also released from ectopic endometrial cells. The aim of this study is to investigate serum pentraxin-3 levels and their correlation with endometriosis in women with endometriosis and healthy women without endometriosis. Methods: This case-control study evaluated patients diagnosed with endometriosis based on imaging techniques or laparoscopy between 2018 and 2020. Serum samples of 71 patients who had been diagnosed with endometriosis as a case group and 56 healthy patients who had undergone laparoscopic tubal ligation and were proven to be endometriosis-free as a control group were compared for pentraxin-3 level. Results: Serum pentraxin-3 level was significantly higher in the endometriosis group compared with the control group ( p < 0.05). Parity and gravida were significantly higher in the control group than in the endometriosis group. When patients with endometriosis surgery history were excluded, there was no significant change in serum pentraxin-3 levels in patients with medical treatment for endometriosis ( p > 0.05). Both the sensitivity and specificity of serum pentraxin-3 were 73.2%. Conclusions: These results demonstrate a relationship between serum pentraxin-3 and endometriosis. Serum pentraxin-3 might be used as a non-invasive method for the diagnosis of endometriosis.

Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes in Women Treated for Bowel Endometriosis: A Seven-Year Single-Centre Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

Background/Objectives: Deep infiltrating endometriosis has been linked to worsened maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, reports regarding bowel endometriosis are still scanty. We aimed to evaluate pregnancy, delivery, and newborn adverse outcomes in women after laparoscopic-assisted surgery for bowel endometriosis. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary-care university hospital. From January 2015 to December 2021, pregnant women who were diagnosed and treated for bowel endometriosis were matched using a 1:3 ratio with pregnant women with no history of endometriosis. Patients were matched using the Cox proportional hazards model to determine parity, age, BMI and gestational age-adjusted relative risk (aRR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Co-primary outcomes were the incidence of labor abnormalities and cesarean section (CS) rate. Co-secondary outcomes were incidence of complications related to pregnancy, delivery, and newborn. Results: A total of 71 pregnancies among women treated for bowel endometriosis and 213 from healthy controls were included. Patients requiring IVF/ET for getting pregnant were in the bowel endometriosis group relative to controls (43.7% vs. 11.7%; p < 0.001). Increased risk of labor abnormalities was present for bowel endometriosis relative to controls (21.1% vs. 17.4%; p = 0.040; aRR 1.39 [95% CI 1.06–2.05]). Risk of non-cephalic fetal presentation (14.1% vs. 6.1%; p = 0.016; aRR 3.08 [95% CI 2.03–4.68]), CS rate (43.7% vs. 24.9%; p = 0.003; aRR 1.75 [95% CI 1.23–2.49]), and emergent CS rate (19.7% vs. 8.5%; p = 0.009; aRR 2.21 [95% CI 1.55–3.16]) were significantly higher in women treated for colorectal endometriosis compared with controls. Moreover, placenta previa (9.9% vs. 0.0%; p < 0.001; aRR 21.82 [95% CI 2.19–116.40]), second-trimester hemorrhage (5.6% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.017; aRR 6.00 [95% CI 1.12–32.06]), postpartum hemorrhage (15.5% vs. 3.3%; p < 0.001; aRR 4.71 [95% CI 1.90–11.70]), and the need for transfusion during labor (5.6% vs. 0.5%; p = 0.004; aRR 12.00 [95% CI 1.36–105.60]) were increased in treatments vs. controls. Concerning neonatal outcomes, an increased risk for neonatal intensive care unit admission was seen in postsurgical endometriotic women relative to healthy controls (26.0% vs. 6.9%; p < 0.001; aRR 3.75 [2.04–3.86]). Conclusions: Women treated for bowel endometriosis seem more exposed to adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes relative to healthy controls. However, additional prospective and comparative studies are needed to validate the available evidence.

Surgical Antifragility Lessons Learned from Endometriosis Surgery

Surgical Antifragility Lessons Learned from Endometriosis Surgery

Robot-assisted nerve-sparing eradication of deep endometriosis using the da Vinci SP

ObjectiveThe evolution of nerve-sparing surgery has been supported by a growing body of literature on anatomic details, dissection techniques, and functional outcomes, suggesting that nerve-sparing surgery for deep endometriosis (DE) reduces postoperative pelvic organ dysfunction, including voiding and rectal dysfunction [1]. Recently, newer single-port robotic systems (da Vinci SP) have become available with articulating instruments and cameras that allow for intracorporeal triangulation, which may overcome some of the weaknesses of conventional single-port laparoscopic surgery [2]. Although such systems are believed to allow more complex surgeries than conventional single-port laparoscopic surgery, the scope of application remains unexplored. The objective of this video is therefore to demonstrate the anatomical and technical highlights of a complex intrapelvic procedure, nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy and complete removal of DE using the da Vinci SP (SP). SettingAn urban general hospital. Stepwise demonstration of the technique with narrated video footage. ParticipantsThe patient was a 47-year-old woman who presented with chronic pelvic pain resistant to pharmacotherapy. Magnetic resonance imaging showed uterine adenomyosis and bilateral ovarian endometrioma with DE, involving the uterosacral ligament and surface of the rectum, with complete cul-de-sac obliteration. InterventionsThe surgical steps were completely identical to conventional multiport laparoscopic robotic surgery [3,4]. This suggests that conventional laparoscopic or robotic skills are highly transferrable to SP. SP offer several advantages, including high-resolution three-dimensional visualization, articulating instruments, and improved dexterity and range of motion. These advantages allow us to comfortably perform meticulous dissection and suturing even in difficult situations such as DE. The postoperative course was uneventful, with no perioperative complications, including no postoperative bladder or rectal dysfunction [5]. She was very satisfied with the invisible operative scar and low degree of postoperative pain. ConclusionNerve-sparing eradication of DE using SP is technically safe and feasible, with cosmetic advantages and less pain.

Progesterone receptor status predicts aggressiveness of human endometriotic lesions in murine avatars

To utilize murine avatars for studying human endometriotic lesion response to two different hormonal regimens to determine if PR can prospectively predict response to progestin-based therapy. Endometriosis is a chronic gynecologic disease afflicting 1-in-10 reproductive-aged women; however response to medical therapy is highly variable as endometriotic lesions do not consistently respond to first-line, progestin-based therapy. We have previously demonstrated in a retrospective study that progesterone receptor (PR) status in lesions correlated with response to progestins. Here, we hypothesize that a prospective approach utilizing PR status to predict response to medical will allow clinicians to individualize effective, timely treatment for this debilitating disease. Patient-Derived Xenograft Murine Model SUBJECTS: Eight-week old NOD/SCID mice undergoing transplantation of endometrioma lesions collected from women undergoing surgery for endometriosis. Daily subcutaneous injections with vehicle (DMSO), Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) or GnRH antagonist, Cetrorelix for 1 month. Lesion size 1 month post-treatment RESULTS: Lesions with high PR demonstrated a robust response to MPA compared to lesions with low PR. Average post-MPA treatment size in high PR lesions was 6-fold smaller than low PR lesions. Low PR lesions respond far more completely to GnRH antagonist than to MPA. Surprisingly, there were differences in response to GnRH antagonist between low and high PR lesions. High PR lesions responded almost completely to GnRH antagonist with a 21-fold smaller post-treatment size on average compared to low PR lesions. Use of murine avatars to test clinical response is a novel approach in endometriosis. Hormonal suppression of disease is a cornerstone of therapy, however response is not fully predictable. We have previously shown that women with low PR lesions respond poorly to progestin-based therapy. Here, we prospectively validate our prior work using a mouse xenograft model, demonstrating that lesions with low PR expression do not respond to progestin-based therapy; PR status predicted response to progestin-based therapy. Moreover, PR status identifies a more aggressive form of endometriosis that is not only progesterone resistant, however is also less dependent on estradiol for growth. Our findings highlight the need to develop novel, nonhormonal therapies aimed at targeting the more aggressive forms of endometriosis that do not rely on the usual hormonal signals.

Surgical Enhancement with the Placement of Temporary Bilateral Ureteral Stents with Indocyanine Green Injection for all Stages of Endometriosis in vNOTES: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Study ObjectiveTo demonstrate the time to place temporary bilateral stents with indocyanine green (ICG) injection, time to intra-operative identification of bilateral ureters - with and without the use of ICG, and number of times for ICG activation in endometriosis excision surgery. DesignRetrospective cross-sectional study. SettingSingle Tertiary Academic Hospital. PatientsFifty serial patients with functioning pelvic ureters, who underwent vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for all stages of endometriosis excision between September 2023 and May 2024. InterventionsPlacement of temporary bilateral ureteral stents with indocyanine green injection before the start of vNOTES, noting the time needed to identify intra-peritoneal ureters with and without ICG activation, and average number of times ICG was activated for endometriosis excision. Measurements and Main ResultsThe median time to place bilateral ureteral stents with ICG injection was 229 seconds. The median time for intra-operative ureteral identification with ICG was 1s (L) and 1s (R). The median time for intra-operative ureteral identification without ICG was 17s (L) and 17s (R). The median time ICG was activated for ureteral identification to perform endometriosis excision was 12 times (L), 11 times (R). From the observations previously described, we share the potential of improved efficiency and efficacy in using ICG in ureteral identification for endometriosis surgery. ConclusionPlacement of temporary bilateral ureteral stents with ICG has the potential for more efficient ureteral identification even after including time for ureteral stent placement and ICG injection. The upfront time needed to place stents may prove to lead to a safer, more efficient procedure.

A New Vision in Endometriosis Surgery: The Impact of Near-Infrared Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging

A New Vision in Endometriosis Surgery: The Impact of Near-Infrared Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging

Surgical techniques for ovarian endometriosis

Key content: All patients with ovarian endometriosis should be offered an individualised, shared decision‐making approach informed by clinical history, symptoms and fertility status. Surgical management of ovarian endometriosis can be effective in treating endometriosis‐associated pelvic pain and infertility, but there is no current evidence that surgery for ovarian endometriosis increases the success of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment. Ovarian reserve tests should be considered before any ovarian surgery and can help guide the patient towards the optimal treatment. The Endometriosis Fertility Index should be incorporated into pre‐operative consultations as a validated tool that estimates the likelihood of spontaneous conception following surgical intervention. Surgeons should be trained in different surgical techniques, types of diathermy and haemostatic agents that can minimise the risk of inadvertent injury to normal ovarian cortex. Learning objectives: To facilitate informed decision‐making regarding the treatment of ovarian endometriosis. To gain insight into the possible surgical techniques available to manage ovarian endometriosis and the evidence behind them. To understand the impact of each technique on endometriosis‐associated pain, fertility outcomes and recurrence rates. Ethical considerations: Should fertility preservation be offered to all women of reproductive age with fertility aspirations and a diagnosis of endometriomas? Should integrated care boards (ICBs) devise specific criteria to offer funding for fertility preservation as an option before surgery for ovarian endometriosis?

Is Complete Excision Always Enough? A Quality of Sexual Life Assessment in Patients with Deep Endometriosis.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to find the factors associated with the severe impairment of QoSL and the factors associated with a better score in QoSL, as well as the evaluation of pain symptoms and QoSL after the complete and incomplete excision of rectovaginal nodules. Materials and methods: The present prospective study was conducted in a single tertiary center for endometriosis where 116 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for deep endometriosis during a 3-year period. The goal of the intervention was to excise all endometriotic implants while conserving the rectum. Intraoperative findings were recorded after the intervention, and the patients were classified according to the ENZIAN classification and rASRM scores. QoSL was assessed using the EHP-30 Module C (QoSL Score). Results: When comparing the mean scores before and 2 years after the surgery, a highly significant improvement was found for QoSL and dysmenorrhea (p < 0.0001). The complete excision of rectovaginal nodules led to a significantly better QoSL and lower dyspareunia (p < 0.0001) than incomplete resection (p < 0.02). Conclusions: This prospective study proves that the complete laparoscopic excision of all endometriotic implants improved the QoSL and decreased the pain score of dyspareunia. Incomplete rectovaginal nodule excision was correlated with a poorer QoSL and a lower improvement of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain scores than complete excision.

Effects of pretreatment with long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists on pregnancy outcomes in patients with minimal and mild peritoneal endometriosis: A retrospective study of 274 frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.

To investigate the effects of pretreatment with long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) before frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) on pregnancy outcomes in patients after minimal-mild (stages I-II) peritoneal endometriosis surgery. A retrospective cohort study was performed from March 2018 to May 2019. Overall, 274 patients met inclusion criteria of undergoing FET after minimal/mild peritoneal endometriosis surgery. For the FET protocol, patients were divided into 2 groups: GnRH-a plus hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (group A, n = 154) and HRT-only (group B, n = 120), with the former divided into 2 subgroups receiving 1 (group A1, n = 80) or 2 doses (group A2, n = 74) of GnRH-a. Basic characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of groups A and B and groups A1 and A2 were compared. Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) were the primary outcomes and logistic regression was used to analyze independent correlation factors. The CPR and LBR in group A were 58.4% and 50.0%, respectively, and were not significantly higher than in group B (49.2% and 40.0%; respectively, χ2 = 2.339, P = .126 and χ2 = 2.719, P = .099, respectively). CPR and LBR in group A1 were not significantly lower than those in group A2 (52.5% and 45.0% vs 64.9% and 55.4%, respectively; χ2 = 2.420, P = .120 and χ2 = 1.665, P = .197, respectively). However, group A2's CPR and LBR were significantly higher than group B's (64.9% and 55.4% vs 49.2% and 40.0%, respectively; χ2 = 4.560, P = .023 and χ2 = 4.375, P = .026, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that GnRH-a pretreatment (1 or 2 doses) had no significant effect on CPR and LBR compared with the HRT-only group. Patients with minimal-mild (stages I-II) peritoneal endometriosis surgery may not require GnRH-a pretreatment before FET.

The role of progesterone and estrogen receptors in treatment choice after endometriosis surgery: A cross-sectional study.

The lack of improvement in some endometriotic people's pain after surgery even while using hormone treatment may suggest an inappropriate response to routine hormonal therapies. This study aimed to determine a cut-off point for selecting the most appropriate treatment based on the hormone receptors of endometriotic lesions. In this cross-sectional study, by reviewing the medical records of participants and testing their archive samples and phone interviews (if needed), 86 symptomatic women after endometriosis surgery who were operated into governmental hospitals, Shahid Faghihi and Hazrate Zeinab Shiraz Iran were enrolled between March 2017 and March 2019. Women were divided into 2 groups: responsiveness (n = 73 for dysmenorrhea, n = 60 for dyspareunia) to medical treatment and surgery, and unresponsiveness (n = 13, n = 7). We examined the pathological slides of 86 women to determine the amount of hormone receptors and the relationship between the type of medical treatment and the level of hormone receptors on pain relief within 1 yr after surgery. Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, dysmenorrhea in the presence of tissue estrogen receptors 60% (p = 0.1065), and dyspareunia in the presence of tissue progesterone receptors 80% (p = 0.0001) responded well to medical treatment after surgery. In the presence of endometrioma-dysmenorrhea showed the best response to oral contraceptive pills (69.4%), while in deep infiltrative endometriosis-dyspareunia showed the best response to progesterone treatment (75%). Prescribing an appropriate hormone therapy based on a specific immunohistochemistry staining pattern can improve the life quality of postoperative endometriosis individuals.

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with posterior cul-de-sac obliteration: step-by-step procedures based on precise anatomical landmarks.

Dense adhesion due to severe endometriosis between the posterior cervical peritoneum and the anterior sigmoid or rectum obliterates the cul-de-sac and distorts normal anatomic landmarks. Surgery for endometriosis is associated with severe complications, including ureteral and rectal injuries, as well as voiding dysfunction. It is important to develop the retroperitoneal avascular space based on precise anatomical landmarks to minimize the risk of ureteral, rectal, and hypogastric nerve injuries. We herein report the anatomical highlights and standardized and reproducible surgical steps of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for posterior cul-de-sac obliteration. We approach the patient with posterior cul-de-sac obliteration using the following five steps. Step 1: Preparation (Mobilization of the sigmoid colon and bladder separation from the uterus). Step 2: Development of the lateral pararectal space and identification of the ureter. Step 3: Isolation of the ureter. Step 4: Development of the medial pararectal space and separation of the hypogastric nerve plane. Step 5: Reopening of the pouch of Douglas. Surgeons should recognize the importance of developing the retroperitoneal avascular space based on precise anatomical landmarks, and each surgical step must be reproducible.

Evaluating the Quality of Endometriosis Operative Reports Among High-Volume Endometriosis Surgeons

ObjectivesTo evaluate the quality of operative reports for endometriosis surgeries performed by fellowship-trained, high-volume endometriosis surgeons. MethodsIn this retrospective review, 5 consecutive deidentified surgical reports per surgeon were evaluated by 2 reviewers. Each dictation was assigned a quality score (between 0 and 28), based on the number of components from the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) classification system that were documented. The primary outcome was the proportion of reports for which the endometriosis AAGL 2021 stage could be assigned. Secondary outcomes included median dictation quality scores, proportion of dictations for fertility-preserving cases where the Endometriosis Fertility Index score could be assigned, individual quality score components, and quality score variation between surgeons, institutions, and reporting methods. ResultsOverall, 82 operative reports were reviewed from 16 surgeons across 7 sites in Ontario. The AAGL stage could be assigned in 48/82 (59%) of cases, and the Endometriosis Fertility Index score could be assigned in 31/45 of fertility-preserving cases (69%). The median quality score was 57% (range 18%–86%). Only 13% of operative reports included comments on residual disease. Quality score consistency between reports was poor for a given surgeon (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.22; 95% CI 0.03–0.49). Quality scores differed significantly between surgeons (χ2 = 30.6, df = 16, P = 0.015) and institutions (χ2 = 19.59, df = 7, P = 0.007). Operative report quality score did not differ based on completion by trainee or staff, template use, or whether the report was completed by telephone or typed. ConclusionsThere is significant variability and inconsistency in endometriosis surgery documentation. There is a need to standardize surgical documentation for endometriosis surgeries, enhancing communication and ultimately patient care.

Intra-operative and post-operative complications of endometriosis excision using the SOSURE approach - A single- surgeon retrospective series of 1116 procedures over 8 years.

Endometriosis surgery outcomes have been widely studied, yet heterogeneity in terminology and techniques persist. This study focuses on the perioperative outcomes of a single surgeon using the same structured approach (SOSURE: Survey & Sigmoid mobilisation, Ovarian mobilisation, Suspension of uterus and ovaries, Ureterolysis, Rectovaginal and pararectal space development, Excision of all visible disease) and adheres to the recent standardised terminology proposed by international gynaecological and endometriosis societies. A quality improvement study was conducted retrospectively from January 2015 to January 2023. Data collection involved two databases: the National British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (BSGE) database and a more comprehensive locally kept database. The methodology also integrated four endometriosis staging systems. Intra-operative and post-operative complication rates. Between 2015 and 2023, 1047 women underwent 1116 endometriosis procedures in various UK hospitals with S.K. as primary surgeon. Exclusions totalled 20 due to missing records and specific surgical criteria. The rate of major post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3a and 3b) was 1.5% and minor post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and 2) were seen in 13.8%. No Clavien-Dindo grade 4 or 5 complications were noted. Our study has shown a low complication rate in endometriosis surgery, despite increasing complexity of surgical cases. This is likely attributed to the surgeon's learning curve, high surgical volume and adherence to a structured approach. Our study demonstrates the learning curve of a surgeon over the course of 8 years. This series involved more than 1000 patients and to our knowledge, is the first to report the complexity of the casemix using four different endometriosis staging systems.

Preventing recurrence of endometriosis-related pain by means of long-acting progestogen therapy: the PRE-EMPT RCT.

Endometriosis affects 1 in 10 women, many of whom have surgery for persistent pain. Recurrence of symptoms following an operation is common. Although hormonal treatment can reduce this risk, there is uncertainty about the best option. To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of long-acting progestogen therapy compared with the combined oral contraceptive pill in preventing recurrence of endometriosis-related pain and quality of life. A multicentre, open, randomised trial with parallel economic evaluation. The final design was informed by a pilot study, qualitative exploration of women's lived experience of endometriosis and a pretrial economic model. Thirty-four United Kingdom hospitals. Women of reproductive age undergoing conservative surgery for endometriosis. Long-acting progestogen reversible contraceptive (either 150 mg depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system) or combined oral contraceptive pill (30 µg ethinylestradiol, 150 µg levonorgestrel). The primary outcome was the pain domain of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 questionnaire at 36 months post randomisation. The economic evaluation estimated the cost per quality-adjusted life-years gained. Four hundred and five women were randomised to receive either long-acting reversible contraceptive (N = 205) or combined oral contraceptive pill (N = 200). Pain scores improved in both groups (24 and 23 points on average) compared with preoperative values but there was no difference between the two (adjusted mean difference: -0.8, 95% confidence interval -5.7 to 4.2; p = 0.76). The long-acting reversible contraceptive group underwent fewer surgical procedures or second-line treatments compared with the combined oral contraceptive group (73 vs. 97; hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 1.00). The mean adjusted quality-adjusted life-year difference between two arms was 0.043 (95% confidence interval -0.069 to 0.152) in favour of the combined oral contraceptive pill, although this cost an additional £533 (95% confidence interval 52 to 983) per woman. Limitations include the absence of a no-treatment group and the fact that many women changed treatments over the 3 years of follow-up. Use of telephone follow-up to collect primary outcome data in those who failed to return questionnaires resulted in missing data for secondary outcomes. The COVID pandemic may have affected rates of further surgical treatment. At 36 months, women allocated to either intervention had comparable levels of pain, with both groups showing around a 40% improvement from presurgical levels. Although the combined oral contraceptive was cost-effective at a threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, the difference between the two was marginal and lower rates of repeat surgery might make long-acting reversible contraceptives preferable to some women. Future research needs to focus on evaluating newer hormonal preparations, a more holistic approach to symptom suppression and identification of biomarkers to diagnose endometriosis and its recurrence. This trial is registered as ISRCTN97865475. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN97865475. This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 11/114/01) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 55. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information. The NIHR recognises that people have diverse gender identities, and in this report, the word 'woman' is used to describe patients or individuals whose sex assigned at birth was female, whether they identify as female, male or non-binary.

Long-Term Follow-Up Regarding Pain Relief, Fertility, and Re-Operation after Surgery for Deep Endometriosis.

Background: Endometriosis is known to be a common chronic disease that often affects the quality of life of patients. Especially for deep endometriosis (DE), the most challenging form of the disease, surgery remains an important component of treatment. However, long-term outcomes after surgery are poorly studied. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the postoperative clinical course of women with DE who underwent surgery, particularly with regard to pain relief, fertility, and re-operations. Methods: Thus, women who underwent surgical treatment for DE between 2005 and 2015 were included in this retrospective questionnaire-based analysis. Results: A total of 87.0% of the patients who underwent surgery for pain reported a postoperative relief of their complaints. Moreover, 44.6% even stated that they were free of pain at the time of the questionnaire. Patients who underwent surgery for infertility and tried to become pregnant postoperatively gave birth to a child in 45.9% of cases. Approximately one-third of the patients had to undergo another surgery because of endometriosis-related symptoms. The main reasons for re-operation were pain and infertility. The median time to re-operation was 2.1 years. Conclusions: In this extraordinarily long follow-up with a remarkable response rate, we show that surgical treatment of DE leads to pain relief and improved fertility in most cases. However, the risk of recurrence and the need for re-operation remains remarkable.

Surgery for Severe Endometriosis and ART Outcome and Effect of Time Interval Between Surgery and FET

Surgery for Severe Endometriosis and ART Outcome and Effect of Time Interval Between Surgery and FET

Endometriosis of the appendix: prevalence, associated lesions, and proposal of pathogenetic hypotheses. A retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data.

To assess the prevalence of endometriosis of the appendix and the association with other pelvic localizations of the disease and to provide pathogenesis hypotheses. Monocentric, observational, retrospective, cohort study. Patients undergoing laparoscopic endometriosis surgery in our tertiary referral center were consecutively enrolled. The prevalence of the different localizations of pelvic endometriosis including appendix involvement detected during surgery was collected. Included patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of appendiceal endometriosis. Women with a history of appendectomy were excluded. Four hundred-sixty patients were included for data analysis. The prevalence of appendiceal endometriosis was 2.8%. In patients affected by endometriosis of the appendix, concomitant ovarian and/or bladder endometriosis were more frequently encountered, with prevalence of 53.9% (vs 21.0% in non-appendiceal endometriosis group, p = 0.005) and 38.4% (vs 11.4%, p = 0.003), respectively. Isolated ovarian endometriosis was significantly associated to appendiceal disease compared to isolated uterosacral ligament (USL) endometriosis or USL and ovarian endometriosis combined (46.2% vs 15.4% vs 7.7%, p < 0.001). Poisson regression analysis revealed a 4.1-fold and 4.4-fold higher risk of ovarian and bladder endometriosis, respectively, and a 0.1-fold risk of concomitant USL endometriosis in patients with appendiceal involvement. Involvement of the appendix is not uncommon among patients undergoing endometriosis surgery. Significant association was detected between appendiceal, ovarian, and bladder endometriosis that may be explained by disease dissemination coming from endometrioma fluid shedding. Given the prevalence of appendiceal involvement, counseling regarding the potential need for appendectomy during endometriosis surgery should be considered.