Benign Prostatic Obstruction Surgery Research Articles

A randomized controlled trial evaluating low-intensity shockwave therapy for treatment of persistent storage symptoms following transurethral surgery for benign prostatic obstruction.

Low-intensity shockwave therapy (Li-SWT) can improve bladder function through enhancement of angiogenesis and nerve regeneration and suppression of inflammation and overactivity. In this trial, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Li-SWT on persistent storage symptoms after transurethral surgery (TUS) for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Between July 2020 and July 2022, 137 patients with persistent storage symptoms; urgency episodes/24 h ≥ 1 and daytime frequency ≥8, for at least three months after TUS for BPO were randomly allocated to Li-SWT versus sham versus solifenacin 10 mg/day in 3:1:1 ratio. The primary end point was the percent reduction from baseline in overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) at 3-month follow-up. The changes in 3-day voiding diary parameters, quality of life (QoL) score, peak flow rate and residual urine at 3 and 6-month follow-up were compared. Treatment-related adverse effects were also evaluated. Baseline data were comparable between groups. The percent reduction from baseline in OABSS at 3-month follow-up was significantly higher in Li-SWT compared to sham (-55% versus -11%), and it was comparable between Li-SWT and solifenacin-10 (-55% versus -60%). Li-SWT achieved significant improvement like solifenacin-10 in 3-day voiding diary parameters and QoL score at 3-month follow-up. This improvement remained comparable between Li-SWT and solifenacin-10 at 6-month follow-up. No adverse effects related to Li-SWT were noted apart from tolerable pain during the procedure. Solifenacin-10 was associated with bothersome adverse effects in 73% of the patients with 11.5% discontinuation rate. Li-SWT ameliorates persistent storage symptoms and promotes QoL after TUS for BPO, with comparable efficacy and better tolerance compared to solifenacin.

Robotic simple prostatectomy vs HOLEP, a 'multi single-center' experiences comparison.

The aim of this study was to compare peri-operative and mid-term outcomes of patients who underwent robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) vs holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP). RASP and HOLEP are the treatments of choice for men with symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and a prostate ≥80 g, achieving comparable short and mid-term efficacy. No randomized controlled studies have proved the superiority of one technique over the other. The prospectively maintained databases of the participating institutions were queried for patients with a prostate volume (PV) ≥80 g, who underwent surgery for BPO between 2011 and 2021. The study population was divided into two subgroups based on surgical approach. Demographics, baseline characteristics, and 12 months outcomes were compared between groups: χ2 and Student t-tests were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. The Trifecta composite outcome (post-operative Q-max >15 ml/sec, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) <8 and absence of complications) was used to define surgical quality and the two groups were compared accordingly. Logistic regression analyses investigated predictors of Trifecta achievement. We included 97 patients with comparable pre-operative features (all p >0.30): 43 underwent RASP, 54 HOLEP. Median PV was 102 g (IQR 89-120) and Q-max was 7.2 ml/s (IQR 5.4-9.0). The Trifecta rate was 43% overall, higher in the RASP subgroup (56% vs 33%; p = 0.02). The endoscopic approach was its only independent predictor (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.28-0.88; p = 0.016). At univariable regression analysis, surgical approach was the only independent predictor of Trifecta achievement, which was significantly higher in the RASP group compared to HOLEP.

Concomitant Endoscopic Surgery for Bladder Tumors and Prostatic Obstruction: Are We Safely Hitting Two Birds with One Stone? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and bladder tumors may co-exist, especially among elderly patients. Transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) and endoscopic surgery for benign prostatic obstruction in the same setting are avoided by many surgeons due to concerns for tumor cell seeding and recurrences in the prostatic urethra. Aim: The aim of this study was assess the effect of concomitant TURBT and endoscopic BPO surgery on oncological safety and patient quality of life via systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases and sources of grey literature published before June 2021 for relevant studies. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMD) to compare concomitant TURBT and BPO surgery versus TURBT alone in terms of recurrence and progression rates. Accordingly, we undertook multiple subgroups and sensitivity analyses (PROSPERO: CRD42020173363). Results: Three randomized and twelve retrospective observational studies with 2421 participants were included. Across studies with good methodological quality, no statistically significant differences were demonstrated regarding overall bladder tumors recurrence rates between concomitant endoscopic BPO surgery and TURBT versus TURBT alone (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.60–1.09, I2 = 42%). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in recurrences located at the bladder neck and/or prostatic urethra (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.76–1.47, I2 = 0%), time to first recurrence (WMD: −0.2 months, 95% Cl: −2.2–1.8, I2 = 48%), and progression rate (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.67–1.64, I2 = 0%). Subgroup analyses based on tumor grade, number of tumors, and utilization of single-instillation chemotherapy post-TURBT did not detect any significant differences in overall bladder tumor recurrence. The level of evidence was estimated as low for all outcomes. Concomitant surgery improved lower urinary tract symptoms. Conclusion: Concomitant endoscopic BPO surgery and TURBT are oncologically safe and improve LUTS-related quality of life.

Does the 5-item Frailty Index predict surgical complications of endoscopic surgical management for benign prostatic obstruction? An analysis of the ACS-NSQIP.

To assess whether the 5-item Frailty Index (5i-FI) predicts surgical complications of endoscopic surgery for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and examine the rates of these complications across BPO surgical modalities adjusting for patient frailty. The ACS-NSQIP registry was queried for patients who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), and laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) between 2009 and 2019. Patients' frailties were estimated using the 5i-FI. We assessed the association between 5i-FI and the following endpoints: all complications, major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3), length of stay (LOS) ≥ 2days, and 30-day postoperative readmission. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to account for selection bias in treatment allocation. IPTW-adjusted rates for 30-day complications were compared between surgical modalities. The cohort included 38,399 (62.6%) TURP, 19,121 (31.2%) PVP, and 3797 (6.2%) LEP. Men with 5i-FI score ≥ 2 were more likely to receive TURP (22.7%) and PVP (22.5%) than LEP (18.8%). 5i-FI ≥ 2 was associated with higher odds of all complications (OR 1.50), major complications (OR 1.63), LOS ≥ 2 (OR 1.31), and readmission (OR 1.65). After IPTW, LEP had the lowest rates for all complications (6.29%; 95%CI 5.48-7.20), major complications (2.30%; 95%CI 1.83-2.89), and readmission (3.80%; 95%CI 3.18-4.53). The 5i-FI score is an independent predictor of 30-day postoperative surgical complications after endoscopic BPO surgery. After IPTW, LEP and PVP were associated with lower rates of complications than TURP. However, frail patients were less likely to undergo PVP and LEP. Preoperative frailty assessment could improve risk stratification before BPO surgery.

Influence of transurethral enucleation with bipolar of the prostate on erectile function: Prospective analysis of 51 patients at 12-month follow-up.

Transurethral enucleation with bipolar (TUEB) is a safe and effective surgery for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). However, few data exist concerning the influence of TUEB on erectile function (EF) in patients with BPO. To evaluate the influence of TUEB on EF in patients with BPO at 3- and 12-month follow-up. We prospectively enrolled 51 patients who underwent TUEB from June 2016 to April 2020. We evaluated maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine (PVR), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), and International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) preoperatively and at 3- and 12-month follow-up. We classified the patients according to their preoperative IIEF-5 score into group 1 (IIEF-5 ≥10; n = 24) and group 2 (IIEF-5 <10; n = 27), and for further evaluation of EF, into subgroups a: severe (IIEF-5 5-7), b: moderate (8-11), c: mild to moderate (12-16), d: mild (17-21), and e: no erectile dysfunction (22-25). Data are displayed as median or median (interquartile range). The study comprised 51 patients with a median age of 75 (70.5-79.5) years. Median prostate and transition zone volumes were 69.5 (46.5-78.8) mL and 30.5 (19-43) mL, respectively. Urinary function improved significantly when comparing respective preoperative, 3-month, and 12-month follow-up values: Qmax (7.6, 12.9, 15.2 mL/s), PVR (50, 0, 0 mL), IPSS (20.5, 9, 6), and QoL (5, 2, 2), respectively. There was no significant change in IIEF-5 score across the three time points: 9, 7, 8. The IIEF-5 score slightly but significantly increased between the preoperative and 12-month follow-up values in group 2 (5, 5, 6) and subgroup a (5, 5, 5). TUEB was effective and safe surgery for patients with BPO and showed no significant influence on EF at 12-month follow-up after TUEB in patients with BPO.

Do men with bladder stones benefit from treatment of benign prostatic obstruction?

To identify whether men aged ≥40 years with bladder stones (BS) benefit from treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). A regional, retrospective study of patients undergoing BS surgery between January 2011 and December 2018 was performed using a prospectively collected database. The primary outcome was BS recurrence after successful removal. Kruskal-Wallis and chi-squared statistical tests were used. A total of 174 patients underwent BS removal and 71 (40.8%) were excluded due to BS formation secondary to causes other than BPO. Hence, 103 men aged ≥40 years had BS successfully removed, of which 40% had a history of upper tract urolithiasis. These men were divided into three groups: those undergoing contemporaneous medical, surgical, or no BPO treatment. Age, diabetes, previous urolithiasis and previous BPO surgery were well matched between the BPO treatment groups. In all, 18 of these men (17%) had BS recurrence after 46 months follow-up. Recurrences were significantly lower following BPO surgery; one of 34 (3%) men versus five of 28 (18%) with no BPO treatment (P = 0.048) and 12 of 41 (29%) with medical BPO treatment (P = 0.003). Recurrences after medical and no BPO treatment were similar (P = 0.280). In all, 34 men (33%) had BPO complications that were similar between groups (P = 0.378). This is the largest reported cohort of men, with the longest follow-up after BS removal. Most men aged ≥40 years with BS benefit from BPO surgery. However, the study findings also support a multifactorial aetiology for BS, which questions the dogma that BS are an 'absolute indication' for BPO surgery, as is stated in the Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms European Association of Urology Guideline. Assessment and management of all causative factors is likely to enable selection of which men will benefit from BPO surgery and to reduce BS recurrence rates.

Predictors of Unfavorable Pathology in Patients with Incidental (pT1a–T1b) Prostate Cancer

BackgroundIncidental prostate cancer (IPCa) is encountered in 10% of surgical procedures for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Identification of patients with underlying detrimental prostate cancer is paramount for tailored treatment decision-making, but guideline recommendations for this setting are lacking. ObjectiveTo highlight clinical and histological characteristics related to BPO surgery that may predict IPCa with unfavorable pathology. Design, setting, and participantsWe included men with IPCa who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) in the short term after IPCa diagnosis. Two cohorts were built according to final pathology for the RP specimen: unfavorable pathology (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade group [GG] ≥3 and/or ≥pT3a and/or pN1) versus favorable pathology. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisWe performed multivariate regression analysis for the endpoint, which was unfavorable pathology for the RP specimen. Using the model estimates for prostate-specific antigen (PSA), ISUP GG, age, and prostate volume, we established a model for estimating the risk of unfavorable histopathology. Results and limitationsOverall, 112 patients were included in the final assessment. On multivariate analysis, PSA (odds ratio [OR] 1.083, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.003–1.170; p = 0.042), ISUP GG for the specimen from BPO surgery (OR 3.090; 95% CI 1.129–8.457; p = 0.028), and age (OR 1.121, 95% CI 1.026–1.225; p = 0.012) were independent predictors for unfavorable histopathology. On receiver operating characteristic analysis, the area under the curve was 0.751. A novel calculator was developed to predict adverse pathology for men with IPCa. The study is limited by its retrospective design. ConclusionsFor men with IPCa, PSA before surgery for BPO, ISUP GG, and age are independent predictors of unfavorable disease. Our results might improve preoperative risk assessment for patient counseling. Patient summaryWe developed a novel calculator to estimate the risk of underlying detrimental disease in men diagnosed with prostate cancer at surgery for benign prostatic obstruction.

Hot Topics of the Past Decade: Evolutions and Revolutions in Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

The past decade has seen the emergence of numerous alternatives to traditional surgery for benign prostatic obstruction. Further trials are ongoing and will probably change our views on management of male lower urinary tract symptoms.

A0444 - Efficacy of low-intensity shock wave therapy on persistent storage symptoms after transurethral surgery for benign prostatic obstruction: Preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial

A0444 - Efficacy of low-intensity shock wave therapy on persistent storage symptoms after transurethral surgery for benign prostatic obstruction: Preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial

Early Efficacy and Safety Outcomes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Stress Urinary Incontinence Following Radical Prostatectomy or Benign Prostatic Obstruction Surgery: Results of a Large Multicentric Study

BackgroundArtificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is the gold standard for the management of moderate to severe stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in the male population. While outcomes of this device in postprostatectomy incontinence (PPI) are widely described, those obtained for incontinence after benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) surgery remains poorly explored. ObjectiveTo compare continence outcomes after AUS implantation in a PPI population with those obtained in men incontinent after BPO surgery. Design, setting, and participantsA retrospective review of all cases of AUS implantation between 2005 and 2020 in 16 different French centers was conducted. Only patients with primary implantation whose indication was moderate to severe SUI after prostatectomy or BPO surgery were included (excluding those with a history of radiation therapy, brachytherapy, cystectomy, high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy, or neurogenic disease). Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe primary endpoint was the rate of social continence (zero or one pad per day) at 3 mo. Complications were also noted within 90 d of implantation. Results and limitationsA total of 417 patients were included in the PPI group and 50 in the BPO surgery group. Social continence rates at 3 mo were similar between the groups (79% vs 72%, p = 0.701). Complication rate was significantly higher in the BPO group (8% vs 18%, p = 0.044). The same was found for the Clavien-Dindo type 2 complication rate (20.6% vs 44.4%, p = 0.026). The retrospective nature and lack of precise definition of incontinence are the main limitations of this study. ConclusionsThis multicentric study strengthens the position of AUS as gold standard for SUI after radical prostatectomy. Comparable efficacy results were found for incontinence after BPO surgery, with nevertheless a higher rate of complications. Patient summaryArtificial urinary sphincter represents the gold standard for the treatment of moderate to severe stress urinary incontinence. Efficacy results are comparable between postprostatectomy incontinence and incontinence after benign prostatic obstruction surgery.

Persistent use of medical therapy after surgery for lower urinary tract symptoms: a retrospective database analysis.

To determine how many men are able to remain off of medical therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) following surgery for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). The TriNetX Analytics Network was used to identify men who were taking medical therapy for BPO (at least one of: alpha-1 blockers, anticholinergics, B3 agonists, or 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors) and subsequently underwent surgery for BPO. They were then placed into one of six cohorts, classified based on the type of surgery they received: transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), Laser vaporization of prostate (PVP), transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), water-vapor thermal therapy (WV), or Laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP). Our primary outcome was persistent use of medical therapy at 6-months-2-years postoperatively. Secondary outcome was surgical retreatment by 2years postoperatively. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was used to control for various risk factors for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). A total of 21,475 men were identified who were on medical therapy and subsequently underwent surgery, which included 12,294 TURP, 5290 PVP, 397 WV, 1308 PUL, 346 TUIP, and 1840 LEP. Medication use between 6months and 2years after surgery was 38% for LEP, 50% for WV, 61% for TURP, 63% for PUL, 65% for TUIP and 66% for PVP. All surgical modalities had higher odds of using medications when compared to LEP (p < 0.001). This remained significant after PSM for 9 potentially confounding variables. A large percentage of men continue medical therapy after surgery for BPO. Amongst multiple surgical modalities available, LEP appears to have the highest rates of medication discontinuation after surgery. In men who wish to avoid medications or who have cardiac risk factors, a discussion with their urologist to select the best option to minimize medical therapy should occur.

State of the art on stress incontinence management after benign prostatic obstruction surgery.

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is mostly seen after prostate surgery (radical prostatectomy or benign prostatic obstruction [BPO] relief). As new surgical techniques (laser, endoscopic enucleation) have been dramatically expanded in the past decade, a focus on postoperative SUI is necessary to provide the best management in this iatrogenic situation. Surgery is the main option for curative management of SUI after BPO as no oral medication is recommended. Preoperative work-up is mandatory to assess concomitant bladder dysfunction. All available surgical options (peri-urethral injections, periurethral balloons, various male slings, and artificial urinary sphincter) have been studied, but the level of evidence is very low. In this setting, SUI after BPO management is widely inspired from post-PR SUI management, mainly based on clinical experience. The available literature regarding persistent SUI after BPO relief is very scarce and further studies are warranted in this specific population.

Minimally invasive surgery for benign prostatic obstruction: new insights and future technical standards.

This review aims to give a brief description of the latest minimally invasive surgical techniques (MISTs) for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). In recent years technological advances have made the implementation of MISTs in the armamentarium of BPO surgery possible and in many cases could replace standard procedures.These techniques offer many advantages -short recovery time, rapid symptomatic relief, few adverse effects, lower risk of sexual/ejaculatory dysfunction, acceptable durability and most can be performed as an outpatient procedure.Many of the newer MISTs can be performed outside the operating room under local anesthesia, hence the term office-based MIST. A tailored BPO surgical treatment should not only take into account the prostate volume, but also many other factors including possible adverse events and the patient's expectations.Further studies and long-term data are necessary to standardize methods for evaluating the outcomes of these new procedures and to see which will pass the test of time and end-up replacing the gold standard procedures.

P0042 - Do men ≥40yrs with bladder stones require surgery for Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO): Does the evidence support the dogma?

P0042 - Do men ≥40yrs with bladder stones require surgery for Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO): Does the evidence support the dogma?

Anticholinergics combined with alpha-blockers for treating lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic obstruction.

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) represent one of the most common clinical complaints in men. Alpha-blockers are widely used as first-line therapy for men with LUTS secondary to BPO, but up to one third of men report no improvement in their LUTS after taking alpha-blockers. Anticholinergicsused in addition to alpha-blockers may help improve symptoms but it is uncertain how effective they are. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of combination therapy with anticholinergics and alpha-blockers in men with LUTS related to BPO. We performed a comprehensive search of medical literature, including the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and trials registries, with no restrictions on the language of publication or publication status. The date of the latest search was 7 August 2020. We included randomized controlled trials. Inclusion criteria were men with LUTS secondary to BPO, ages 40 years or older, and a total International Prostate Symptom Score of 8 or greater. We excluded trials of men with a known neurogenic bladder due to spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, or central nervous system disease, and those examining medical therapy for men who were treated with surgery for BPO. We performed three comparisons: combination therapy versus placebo, combination therapy versus alpha-blockers monotherapy, and combination therapy versus anticholinergics monotherapy. Two review authors independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and interpreted data according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty of evidence. We included 23 studies with 6285 randomized men across three comparisons. The mean age of participants ranged from 54.4 years to 73.9 years (overall mean age 65.7 years). Of the included studies, 12 were conducted with a single-center setting, while 11 used a multi-center setting. We only found short-term effect (12 weeks to 12 months) of combination therapy based on available evidence. Combination therapy versus placebo: based on five studies with 2369 randomized participants, combination therapy may result in little or no difference in urologic symptom scores (mean difference (MD) -2.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.55 to 0.08; low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain about the effect of combination therapy on quality of life (QoL) (MD -0.97, 95% CI -2.11 to 0.16; very low-certainty evidence). Combination therapy likely increases adverse events (risk ratio (RR) 1.24, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.47; moderate-certainty evidence);based on252adverse events per 1000 participants in the placebo group, this corresponds to 61more adverse events (95% CI 10 more to 119more) per 1000 participants treated with combination therapy. Combination therapy versus alpha-blockers alone: based on 22 studies with 4904 randomized participants, we are very uncertain about the effect of combination therapy on urologic symptom scores (MD -2.04, 95% CI -3.56 to -0.52; very low-certainty evidence) and QoL (MD -0.71, 95% CI -1.03 to -0.38; very low-certainty evidence). Combination therapy may result in little or no difference in adverse events rate (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.34; low-certainty evidence); based on228adverse events per 1000 participants in the alpha-blocker group, this corresponds to 23more adverse events (95% CI 23 fewerto 78more) per 1000 participants treated with combination therapy. Combination therapy compared to anticholinergics alone: based on three studies with 1218 randomized participants, we are very uncertain about the effect of combination therapy on urologic symptom scores (MD -3.71, 95% CI -9.41 to 1.98; very low-certainty evidence). Combination therapy may result in an improvement in QoL (MD -1.49, 95% CI -1.88 to -1.11; low-certainty evidence). Combination therapy likelyresults in little to no difference in adverse events (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.95; moderate-certainty evidence);based on 115adverse events per 1000 participants in the anticholinergic alone group, this corresponds to 4 feweradverse events (95% CI 7fewerto 13more) per 1000 participants treated with combination therapy. Based on the findings of the review, combination therapy with anticholinergics and alpha-blockers are associated with little or uncertain effects on urologic symptom scores compared to placebo, alpha-blockers, or anticholinergics monotherapy. However, combination therapy may result in an improvement in quality of life compared to anticholinergics monotherapy, but an uncertain effect compared to placebo, or alpha-blockers. Combination therapy likely increases adverse events compared to placebo, but not compared to alpha-blockers or anticholinergics monotherapy.The findings of this review were limited by study limitations, inconsistency, and imprecision. We were unable to conduct any of the predefined subgroup analyses.

Efficacy and Safety of Surgery for Benign Prostatic Obstruction in Patients with Preoperative Urinary Catheter.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) surgery in patients with preoperative urinary catheterization. Patients and Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study including all patients who failed a trial without catheter (TWOC) after acute urinary retention (AUR) between January 2017 and January 2019. Patients with neurogenic bladder, prostate cancer, or urethral stricture were excluded from the analysis. Patients underwent either monopolar/bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), prostate artery embolization (PAE), open prostatectomy (OP), or endoscopic enucleation. The primary endpoint was 12-month urinary catheter-free survival without using benign prostatic hyperplasia medications. Results: One hundred seventy-one consecutive men (median age: 71 years; median prostate volume: 75 cm3) underwent BPO surgery, including 48 (28%) TURP, 62 (36.3%) PVP, 21 (12.3%) endoscopic enucleation, 15 (8.8%) PAE, and 25 (14.6%) OP. The median duration of preoperative urinary catheterization was 69 days (interquartile range 46-125). The 12-month urinary catheter-free survival rate was 84.8% (145/171). Satisfactory voiding returned to 121 patients (70.8%). On backward stepwise multivariable analysis, PVP (odds ratio [OR] 0.27 [0.10-0.69]; p = 0.008), PAE (OR 5.27 [1.28-27.75]; p = 0.03), endoscopic enucleation (OR 0.08 [0-0.49]; p = 0.023), OP (OR 0.10 [0.01-0.57]; p = 0.034), Charlson score (OR 1.36 [1.14-1.66]; p = 0.001), and number of preoperative TWOC failure (OR 2.53 [1.23-5.51]; p = 0.014) were significantly associated with catheter-free survival. Conclusions: In this multi-institutional retrospective study, including patients with preoperative catheterization, the overall success rate of BPO surgery was 70.8% after 1-year follow-up. Compared with TURP, enucleation methods and PVP were associated with better catheter-free survival, whereas PAE was associated with higher risk of AUR recurrence.

Initial Experience with Radical Prostatectomy Following Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

BackgroundAlthough an increasing number of prostate cancer (PCa) patients received holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) previously for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), there is still no evidence regarding the outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) in this setting. ObjectiveTo assess functional and oncological results of RP in PCa patients who received HoLEP for BPO previously in a contemporary multi-institutional cohort. Design, setting, and participantsA total of 95 patients who underwent RP between 2011 and 2019 and had a history of HoLEP were identified in two institutions. Functional as well as oncological follow-up was prospectively assessed and retrospectively analyzed. InterventionRP following HoLEP compared with RP without previous transurethral surgery. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisPatients with complete follow-up data were matched with individuals with no history of BPO surgery using propensity score matching. Complications were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo scale. Results and limitationsThe median follow-up was 50.5 mo. We found no significant impact of previous HoLEP on positive surgical margin rate (14.0% [HoLEP] vs 18.8% [no HoLEP], p = 0.06) and biochemical recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32–1.70, p = 0.4). Patients with a history of HoLEP had increased 1-yr urinary incontinence rates after RP. After adjusting for confounders, no significant impact of previous HoLEP was found (odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95% CI 0.74–1.01; p = 0.07). Previous HoLEP did not hamper 1-yr erectile function recovery (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05–1.43; p = 0.01). Limitations include retrospective design and small sample size. ConclusionsRP after previous HoLEP is surgically feasible, with low complication rates and no negative impact on biochemical recurrence–free survival. However, in a multivariable analysis, we observed significantly worse 1-yr continence rates in patients after previous HoLEP. Patient summaryIn the current study, we assessed the oncological and functional outcomes of radical prostatectomy in patients who underwent holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) previously due to prostatic bladder outlet obstruction. A history of HoLEP did not hamper oncological results, 1-yr continence, and erectile function recovery.

Surgery for benign prostatic obstruction

Almost all men have some form of benign prostatic hyperplasia as they age, often resulting in lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction. Most patients with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms are treated with drugs (eg, α blockers or 5α-reductase inhibitors) and surgery is usually reserved for patients who do not respond to drug treatment. Both the safety issues of medication and surgery-related morbidity must be weighed against the efficacy of these treatments. The main reasons for discontinuation of drug treatment are serious adverse effects, such as postural hypotension, asthenia, dizziness, and impairment of sexual function, or loss of efficacy over time.

The Initial Clinical Experience of a New Generation Bipolar Electrosurgical and Morcellator Unit for Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate

Background and Objective To assess the feasibility and safety of performing bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate (BIPO-LEP) with a new generation of bipolar electrosurgical and morcellator system. Material and Methods Forty-five consecutive patients scheduled for endoscopic surgery for benign prostatic obstruction were pro-spectively recruited. BIPOLEP was performed with the use of the third generation Karl Storz AUTOCON III 400 and morcellator unit. All patients had a trial without a catheter on Day-1 after surgery. Demographical, preoperative, intraoperative and follow-up data up to 3 months post-surgery were collected and analyzed. Results Between May 2018 and April 2019, 45 consecutive patients underwent BIPOLEP in our institution were prospectively recruited for this study. The mean age was 76 years old. Thirty-four patients (75.6%) were in refractory retention or obstructive uropathy. The mean enucleation efficiency was 1.76 grams per minute of enucleation time (SD = 0.7 gram per minute). The mean bladder irrigation and catheterization times were 5.3 hours and 20.7 hours respectively. Only one patient failed voiding trial on Day-1 after surgery. The postoperative Day-1 discharge rate was 73.3% (n = 33). The median length of hospital stay was 1 day. No patient required clot evacuation or blood transfusion. Seven patients (15.6%) were readmitted within thirty days postoperatively for complications, due to hematuria (8.9%, n = 4) and febrile urinary tract infection (6.7%, n = 3). Nevertheless, none was readmitted for acute urinary retention. Conclusion The use of a new generation of bipolar electrosurgical and morcellator unit for BIPOLEP was safe and the majority could be discharged without catheter within one day after surgery.

Surgical management of benign prostatic obstruction: 20-year population-level trends.

Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) due to histological benign prostatic hyperplasia is highly prevalent among older men. Despite widespread use of medical therapy, surgical treatment remains a mainstay in the management of BPO. We sought to characterize trends in the surgical management of BPO in Ontario, Canada. We performed an interrupted time-series analysis using segmented regression among men aged 18 years and older undergoing surgical treatment for BPO between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 2014 in Ontario, Canada. The passage of time was considered the primary exposure. The primary outcome was the proportion of all BPO surgeries performed using each of the following modalities: transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), endoscopic laser prostatectomy, open/laparoscopic prostatectomy, and others. We identified 136 459 men who underwent BPO surgery between 1994 and 2014. The annual age-adjusted rate of BPO surgery declined significantly over time (24 to 10 per 10 000 population in 1994 and 2014, respectively). From 1994-2001, there were no significant changes in the distribution of BPO surgical modalities, with TURP the most common throughout (97.2% and 97% in 1994 and 2001, respectively). From 2002-2014, there was a significant decline in the use of TURP (92.1% to 76.9%; p=0.027) with a corresponding increase in the use of endoscopic laser prostatectomy (3.5% to 21.9%; p=0.0008). This study demonstrates a shift in the management of BPO, with increasing use of endoscopic laser prostatectomy, beginning in 2002. However, TURP remains the most common treatment modality.