Surgeon's Toolbox Research Articles

Machine Learning Models Leveraging Smartphone-Based Patient Mobility Data Can Accurately Predict Functional Outcomes After Spine Surgery.

Objective: The development of adjacent segment disease or the progression of spondylosis following the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis is well documented and can lead to subsequent functional decline after a successful index surgery. The early detection of negative inflection points during patients' functional recovery can improve timely intervention. In this study, we developed machine learning (ML) models to predict the occurrence of post-operative decline in patient mobility. Methods: Patients receiving spine surgery for degenerative spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis were retroactively consented and enrolled. Activity data (steps-per-day) previously recorded across a 4-year peri-operative were collected alongside relevant clinical and demographic variables. Logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) ML models were constructed and trained on 80% of the dataset and validated using the remaining 20%. The study's primary endpoint was the models' ability to predict post-operative decline in patient mobility. Results: A total of 75 patients were included. Following training, RF and XGBoost models achieved accuracy values of 86.7% (sensitivity 80%, specificity 90%) and 80% (sensitivity 60%, specificity 90%), respectively, in predicting post-operative functional decline. The LR model was the least effective with an accuracy of 73.3% (sensitivity 50%, specificity 88.8%). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed an area under the curve of 0.80 for RF, 0.70 for XGBoost, and 0.69 for LR. Conclusions: ML models trained on activity data collected from smartphones successfully forecast functional decline in post-operative activity following spine surgery. These results lay the groundwork for the future integration of ML into the surgeon's toolbox for prognostication and surgical planning.

The use of Three-Dimensional Printing in Orthopaedics: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

3D-printing is a rapidly developing technology with applications in orthopaedics including pre-operative planning, intraoperative guides, design of patient specific instruments and prosthetics, and education. Existing literature demonstrates that in the surgical treatment of a wide range of orthopaedic pathology, using 3D printing shows favourable outcomes. Despite this evidence 3D printing is not routinely used in orthopaedic practice. We aim to evaluate the advantages of 3D printing in orthopaedic surgery to demonstrate its widespread applications throughout the field. We performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. AMED, EMBASE, EMCARE, HMIC, PsycINFO, PubMed, BNI, CINAHL and Medline databases were searched using Healthcare Databases Advanced Search (HDAS) platform. The search was conducted to include papers published before 8th November 2020. Clinical trials, journal articles, Randomised Control Trials and Case Series were included across any area of orthopaedic surgery. The primary outcomes measured were operation time, blood loss, fluoroscopy time, bone fusion time and length of hospital stay. A total of 65 studies met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed, and 15 were suitable for the meta-analysis, producing a data set of 609 patients. The use of 3D printing in any of its recognised applications across orthopaedic surgery showed an overall reduction in operative time (SMD = -1.30; 95%CI: -1.73, -0.87), reduction in intraoperative blood loss (SMD = -1.58; 95%CI: -2.16, -1.00) and reduction in intraoperative fluoroscopy time (SMD = -1.86; 95%CI: -2.60, -1.12). There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay or in bone fusion time post-operatively. The use of 3D printing in orthopaedics leads to an improvement in primary outcome measures showing reduced operative time, intraoperative blood loss and number of times fluoroscopy is used. With its wide-reaching applications and as the technology improves, 3D printing could become a valuable addition to an orthopaedic surgeon's toolbox.

ASO Author Reflections: Preoperative Imaging Findings to Predict Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Adding Another Tool to the Surgeon's Toolbox.

ASO Author Reflections: Preoperative Imaging Findings to Predict Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Adding Another Tool to the Surgeon's Toolbox.

Magnetic sphincter augmentation: paradigm change or just another device in the surgeon's toolbox?

The common denominator for virtually all episodes of gastroesophageal reflux in health and disease is the loss of the barrier that confines the distal esophagus to the stomach. Factors important in maintaining the function of the barrier are its pressure, length and position. In early reflux disease, overeating, gastric distention and delayed gastric emptying led to a transient loss of the barrier. A permanent loss of the barrier occurs from inflammatory injury to the muscle allowing free flow of gastric juice into the esophageal body. Corrective therapy requires augmentation or restoration of the barrier referred to more commonly as the lower esophageal sphincter.

Reply from authors: Sutureless valves-expanding the surgeon's toolbox.

Reply from authors: Sutureless valves-expanding the surgeon's toolbox.

Surgical Outcomes of Hysterectomy Via Robotic Assisted Versus Traditional Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery

<h3>Study Objective</h3> To evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotic assisted transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (R-vNOTES) hysterectomy when compared to traditional vNOTES (T-vNOTES) hysterectomy. <h3>Design</h3> A retrospective chart review. <h3>Setting</h3> An academic tertiary setting. <h3>Patients or Participants</h3> 114 patients with benign gynecologic indication for hysterectomy. <h3>Interventions</h3> T-vNOTES or R-vNOTES hysterectomy performed by a single minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon in the study period. <h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3> The primary outcome of this study was surgical equivalence, measured principally by total operative time between T-vNOTES and R-vNOTES hysterectomy. Secondary operative outcomes measured included estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, reported postoperative pain levels, and number of conversions. 79 women underwent T-vNOTES hysterectomy and 35 women underwent R-vNOTES hysterectomy without differences in operative time (p = .37), estimated blood loss (p = .27), length of hospital stay (p = .06), or reported postoperative pain levels at weeks 1, 2, and 3 after surgery (p = .78, p = .36, p = .38, respectively). 6 patients underwent conversion in the T-vNOTES hysterectomy group compared to 0 in the R-vNOTES hysterectomy group; however, this was not statistically significantly different, and there were no conversions to laparotomy. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Robotic vNOTES hysterectomy is a feasible approach to surgery when compared to traditional vNOTES hysterectomy and warrants further consideration as a skillset in a gynecologic surgeon's toolbox. Wristed instruments may allow surgeons unexperienced in single site laparoscopy to more quickly adopt vNOTES as a new technique when performing hysterectomy through a comparable minimally invasive approach.

Surgical Outcomes of Hysterectomy via Robot-assisted versus Traditional Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (R-vNOTES) hysterectomy when compared with traditional vNOTES (T-vNOTES) hysterectomy. Retrospective chart review. Academic tertiary setting. Total of 114 patients with benign gynecologic indication for hysterectomy. T-vNOTES or R-vNOTES hysterectomy performed by a single minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon in the study period. The primary outcome of this study was surgical equivalence, measured principally by total operative time between T-vNOTES and R-vNOTES hysterectomy. Secondary operative outcomes that were measured included estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, reported postoperative pain levels, and number of conversions. A total of 79 women underwent T-vNOTES hysterectomy, and 35 women underwent R-vNOTES hysterectomy without differences in operative time (p=.37), estimated blood loss (p=.27), length of hospital stay (p=.06), or reported postoperative pain levels at weeks 1, 2, and 3 after surgery (p=.78, p=.36, p=.38, respectively). A total of 6 patients underwent conversion in the T-vNOTES hysterectomy group compared with 0 in the R-vNOTES hysterectomy group; however, this was not statistically significantly different, and there were no conversions to laparotomy. R-vNOTES hysterectomy is a feasible approach to surgery when compared with T-vNOTES hysterectomy and warrants further consideration as a skill set in a gynecologic surgeon's toolbox. Wristed instruments may allow surgeons who are inexperienced in single-site laparoscopy to adopt vNOTES more quickly as a new technique when performing hysterectomy through a comparable minimally invasive approach.

Current state of the art in fat grafting: paradigm shift in surgical techniques and refinements in cleft and craniofacial reconstruction.

The purpose of this review is to provide an update on current practice and trends in fat graft surgery. The present review covers postoperative fat graft survival and phases, recipient bed and fat tissue enrichment issues, the spectrum of clinical applications in the cleft-craniofacial field, surgical techniques, and predictive factors for different outcomes. Current investigations have led to a better understanding of fat graft survival and postoperative clinical progress. Fat grafting has been successfully adopted in a broad spectrum of cleft-related, craniofacial contour-related, burn-related, and radiation-related indications. Many variations on harvesting, processing, and delivery techniques and the use of recipient-site preconditioning and cell-enriched methods to increase the efficiency of fat grafting have been described, but little consensus exists about which technique is optimal. The development of predictors for fat grafting-related outcomes can aid multidisciplinary teams in providing better preoperative counseling, selecting the most suitable candidates for treatment, and establishing patient-specific postoperative care profiles. The addition of modern fat graft surgery to the surgeon's toolbox revolutionized the delivery of surgical cleft and craniofacial care. Further investigation is necessary to assist surgeons in selecting the best candidates and optimal techniques.

Liver ultrasound: A key procedure in the surgeon's toolbox.

Intraoperative liver ultrasound (US) is an imperative adjunctive procedure during any liver surgical procedure. Intraoperative US can be used to confirm preoperative findings, to identify new findings, and to guide the conduct of the procedure. A major barrier to incorporation of US into the surgeon's toolbox is training and education. A standardized training program for surgical fellows has been developed based on the mastery learning framework.

Totally robotic modified complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer: technical feasibility and mid-term oncologic outcomes.

Recently, an operative strategy involving complete mesocolic excision (CME) and central vascular ligation (CVL) for colonic cancer has been introduced. We aimed to describe our initial experience and assess the long-term outcomes of robotic modified CME (mCME) and CVL (mCME+CVL) for right-sided colon cancer. Of the 677 patients with histologically confirmed, right-sided colon adenocarcinoma who underwent curative mCME+CVL between February 2008 and October 2016, 43 who were treated entirely using the robotic approach were included in this retrospective study. Survival rates were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method, and P values of < 0.05 indicated statistically significant differences. The total operation and docking times were 293 (180-644) min and 5 (3-19) min, respectively, with an estimated blood loss of 50 (10-400) mL. The time to soft diet was 4 (1-16) days and the length of hospitalization was 8 (4-48) days. Based on the Clavien-Dindo classification, grade I, II, IIIa, IIIb, and IV complications were noted in 3 (7.0%), 5 (11.7%), 2 (4.7%), 1 (2.3%), and 0 (0%) patients, respectively. The proximal and distal resection margins were 14 (4-54) and 19 (4-48) cm, respectively, and 29 (6-157) lymph nodes were harvested per patient. The patients were followed-up for a median of 55 (2-109) months, during which the overall survival rate, median disease-free period, disease-free survival rate, and tumor recurrence rate were 93.6%, 38 (2-109) months, 81.1%, and 16.3% (7 patients), respectively. Robotic mCME and CVL for right-sided colon cancer was feasible and safe. It can be added to the surgeon's toolbox as an optional strategy for the management of colon cancer patients.

Validated Outcomes in the Grafting of Autologous Fat to the Breast: The VOGUE Study. Development of a Core Outcome Set for Research and Audit.

Autologous fat grafting is an important part of the reconstructive surgeon's toolbox when treating women affected by breast cancer and subsequent tumor extirpation. The debate over safety and efficacy of autologous fat grafting continues within the literature. However, work performed by the authors' group has shown significant heterogeneity in outcome reporting. Core outcome sets have been shown to reduce heterogeneity in outcome reporting. The authors' goal was to develop a core outcome set for autologous fat grafting in breast reconstruction. The authors published their protocol a priori. A Delphi consensus exercise among key stakeholders was conducted using a list of outcomes generated from their previous work. These outcomes were divided into six domains: oncologic, clinical, aesthetic and functional, patient-reported, process, and radiologic. In the first round, 55 of 78 participants (71 percent) completed the Delphi consensus exercise. Consensus was reached on nine of the 13 outcomes. The clarity of the results and lack of additional suggested outcomes deemed further rounds to be unnecessary. The VOGUE Study has led to the development of a much-needed core outcome set in the active research front and clinical area of autologous fat grafting. The authors hope that clinicians will use this core outcome set to audit their practice, and that researchers will implement these outcomes in their study design and reporting of autologous fat grafting outcomes. The authors encourage journals and surgical societies to endorse and encourage use of this core outcome set to help refine the scientific quality of the debate, the discourse, and the literature. Therapeutic, V.

Preventing Rescue Surgeries by Endoscopic Clipping: A Valuable Resource in the Surgeon's Toolbox.

Over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) System is a relatively new endoluminal intervention for gastrointestinal (GI) leaks, fistulas, and bleeding. Here, we present a single center experience with the device over the course of 4 years. Retrospective chart review was conducted for patients who received endoscopic OTSC treatment. Primary outcome is the resolution of the original indication for clip placement. Secondary outcomes are complications and time to resolution. Forty-one patients underwent treatment with the OTSC system from 2011 to 2015 with average follow-up of 152 days. The average age is 53.7. The most common site of clip placement was in the stomach (44%). Clips were placed after surgical complication for 28 patients (68%), endoscopic complications for 8 patients (19%), and spontaneous presentation in 5 patients (12%). Technical success was achieved in all patients. Overall, 34 patients (83%) were successfully treated. Nine patients required multiple clips and three patients required additional treatment modalities after OTSC. Four patients used the OTSC as a bridging therapy to surgery. Using OTSC for palliation versus nonpalliative indications was associated with lower rates of treatment success (50% versus 86%, P = .028). Using OTSC for symptoms <6 months had higher rates of treatment success than those experiencing longer symptoms (88% versus 65%, P = .045). There were no major morbidities or mortalities directly associated with the OTSC system. Complications from clip use were pain in two patients (5%) and hematemesis in one patient (3%). The OTSC System can be a very successful treatment for iatrogenic or spontaneous GI leaks and bleeds. Treatment success is more likely in patients treated within 6 months of diagnosis and less likely to when used for palliation. It was also successfully used as bridging therapy in several patients.

Do Not Fear an Implant's Shape: A Single Surgeon's Experience of Over 1200 Round and Shaped Textured Implants in Primary Breast Augmentation.

Breast implants can be characterized by their fill material, surface texture, or shape. Whereas long-term good quality studies have provided evidence for the fill material and texture, there is still little consensus for choosing the shape of an implant. Surveys indicate that many surgeons choose only one implant shape, for reasons that may not always agree with outcomes from long-term studies. We reviewed the first author's experience over the last six years with both round and anatomical implants, compared the rate of complications with either implant shape, and discussed the importance of keeping an open mind about using both implant shapes for primary breast augmentation. A review of all consecutive primary breast augmentation patients by the first author over a six-year time period who had a minimum follow up of 6 months after surgery. Six-hundred and forty-eight female patients had 1296 silicone breast implants inserted over the six-year period. Mean age at surgery was 30.5 years and mean BMI was 20.6 kg/m2. All implants were textured, 134 (in 67 patients, 10.3%) were round in shape with mean volume of 338 cc (range, 220-560 cc), while 1162 implants (in 581 patients, 89.7%) were anatomical shaped with a mean volume of 309 cc (range, 140-615 cc). Among these patients, 11.9% (n = 8) with round implants and 9.0% (n = 52) of those with anatomical implants developed complications postoperatively. A single, ideal implant that is suitable for every primary breast augmentation does not exist. The optimum choice of implant shape in any given situation should take into account the patient's physical characteristics, available implant types, patient's desires, and the surgeon's experience. Together with round implants, anatomical devices ought to be considered as one of the tools in the surgeon's toolbox. By choosing to ignore them a priori means that the surgeon will only have access to half of his armamentarium and will therefore be able to offer a limited set of options to his patients.

Coming of age of oncoplastic breast surgery.

For every breast surgeon's toolbox

Review of Robotic Surgery in Gynecology-The Future Is Here.

The authors present a systematic review of randomized and observational, retrospective and prospective studies to compare between robotic surgery as opposed to laparoscopic, abdominal, and vaginal surgery for the treatment of both benign and malignant gynecologic indications. The comparison focuses on operative times, surgical outcomes, and surgical complications associated with the various surgical techniques. PubMed was the main search engine utilized in search of study data. The review included studies of various designs that included at least 25 women who had undergone robotic gynecologic surgery. Fifty-five studies (42 comparative and 13 non-comparative) met eligibility criteria. After careful analysis, we found that robotic surgery was consistently connected to shorter post-surgical hospitalization when compared to open surgery, a difference less significant when compared to laparoscopic surgery. Also, it seems that robotic surgery is highly feasible in gynecology. There are quite a few inconsistencies regarding operative times and estimated blood loss between the different approaches, though in the majority of studies estimated blood loss was lower in the robotic surgery group. The high variance in operative times resulted from the difference in surgeon’s experience. The decision whether robotic surgery should become mainstream in gynecological surgery or remain another surgical technique in the gynecological surgeon’s toolbox requires quite a few more randomized controlled clinical trials. In any case, in order to bring robotic surgery down to the front row of surgery, training surgeons is by far the most important goal for the next few years.

The “Down the PC” view – A new tool to assess screw positioning in the posterior column of the acetabulum

IntroductionMinimal-invasive placement of screws into the posterior column of the acetabulum (PC) is challenging. Due to the saddle-shaped curvature of the medial cortical border of the PC, the standard fluoroscopic views of the pelvis cannot provide the desired safety during screw insertion. The aim of this study was to define a view tangentially to the medial cortex of the PC and to evaluate its accuracy and inter-observer reproducibility. MethodsRadio-dense markers on the medial cortex of the PC along the axis of a PC screw were brought in line and landmarks of the new “Down the PC” view were determined. Kirschner wires were placed into the PC of a pelvis composite model and five pelvic cadaver specimens in a total of 34 different correct and incorrect positions. Based on either only the “Down the PC” view, only the standard views, or a combination of both, three fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons had to decide if the inserted wires were in bone in the posterior column or had exited cortex, and if they penetrated the acetabulum. Sensitivity, specificity, and the intra-class correlation coefficient were calculated. ResultsA view using three radiographic landmarks (pelvic brim, medial cortical wall of the body of the ischium, ischial spine) was found. Sensitivity and specificity to detect perforation out of the bone were 1.00 and 0.97 for the “Down the PC” view, 0.46 and 0.97 if only the standard views were used, and 1.00 and 0.95 for a combination of both. Sensitivity and specificity to detect intra-articular wire placement were 1.00 and 0.96 for the “Down the PC” view, 0.72 and 0.95 if only the standard views were used, and 0.94 and 0.99 for a combination of both. Inter-observer agreement using only the “Down the PC” view was excellent with an ICC of 0.92 for perforation and ICC of 0.82 for intra-articular wire placement. ConclusionsThe “Down the PC” view is a useful addendum in the orthopaedic trauma surgeon's tool box. Using simple landmarks, it is easily to reproduce and thereby shows excellent accuracy and inter-observer agreement in order to detect medial perforation or intra-articular implant position.

The management of elbow instability using an internal joint stabilizer: preliminary results.

BackgroundNonsurgical and surgical treatments such as immobilization, transarticular pinning, and hinged or nonhinged external fixation have been used to treat unstable elbows. These methods all have drawbacks. We thought that a bent Steinmann pin introduced through the axis of ulnohumeral rotation and attached to the ulna could provide an improved method of treatment and that this could result in the development of a proper internal joint fixator that may have widespread application.Questions/purposesDoes a fully internal hinged fixator crafted intraoperatively by the surgeon from a Steinmann pin for patients undergoing surgery for severe elbow instability result in restoration of range of motion and elbow stability? Does it result in new complications?MethodsWe reviewed the first 10 patients treated with the method for elbow instability. Diagnoses included fracture-dislocations of the elbow that remain unstable after fracture repair and unstable elbows that result from release of contracture or ulnohumeral synostosis. During that time, all patients meeting these criteria who underwent surgery by this surgeon (JLO) were treated with this approach. Charts, radiographs, and therapy notes were assessed at a minimum of 14 months (mean, 32 months; range, 14–59 months); no patients were lost to followup. Data recorded included age, sex, and elbow and forearm range of motion as well as any complications and reoperations that occurred. The absence of elbow instability was determined initially by radiographically observing concentric reduction of the ulnohumeral and radiocapitellar joints and later by radiography plus the absence of clinical signs and symptoms of elbow instability.ResultsMean range of motion at latest followup was flexion 134°, extension −19°, pronation 75°, and supination 64°. All elbows were clinically and radiographically stable. Complications resulting in additional procedures occurred in four patients, including one recurrent deep infection in a patient with a remote history of sepsis, one wound hematoma that resolved after a drainage procedure performed in the office, one prominent implant treated by partial removal, and one patient with heterotopic ossification treated with excision of the heterotopic bone.ConclusionsThis technique restores elbow stability and permits motion without the use of transcutaneous pins. It seems promising for the treatment of patients with severe elbow instability but requires a second procedure for removal. Further investigation is needed to understand its place in the surgeon’s toolbox and what drawbacks it may have.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.