This study delves into the risks associated with 3D-printed hand prostheses lacking mechanical feasibility studies. Such unvalidated prostheses may exhibit various issues like durability shortcomings, anatomical incompatibility, functional safety concerns, manufacturing quality deficiencies, and health risks due to inappropriate materials. These issues can lead to damage or premature failure during use, discomfort, skin irritation, injuries, inability to withstand functional loads, and health hazards from toxic or allergenic substances. Therefore, ensuring the safety, quality, and effectiveness of these prostheses is crucial. The study focuses on a mechanical feasibility study conducted through Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations on an open-source hand prosthesis model. It evaluates mechanical properties, stress concentration areas, and displacement on the prosthesis surface. The methodology comprises three key steps: acquiring the virtual model, conducting computational simulations, and selecting the 3D printing material. The simulations assess the prosthesis’s ability to withstand compressive forces and identify stress concentration areas. Results from the study indicate that using PETG as the constituent material demonstrates mechanical viability and satisfactory performance under static force conditions. This finding underscores the importance of rigorous testing and adherence to standards in developing 3D-printed hand prostheses. Such studies contribute significantly to enhancing these devices’ safety and effectiveness, facilitating their broader adoption in healthcare settings. In summary, this study highlights the critical need for mechanical feasibility studies in the development of 3D-printed hand prostheses. It emphasizes the significance of following strict standards and regulations to ensure these devices’ safety, quality, and functionality. By doing so, it paves the way for the widespread use of these prostheses in healthcare, benefiting users and advancing the field of prosthetic technology.
Read full abstract