Suppression Of Otoacoustic Emissions Research Articles

Enhanced suppression of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

Dopamine depletion affects several aspects of hearing function. Previous work [Wu, Yi, Manca, Javaid, Lauer, and Glowatzki, eLife 9, e52419 (2020)] demonstrated the role of dopamine in reducing the firing rates of inner ear cells, which is thought to decrease synaptic excitotoxicity. Thus, a lack of dopamine could indirectly increase acoustic stimulation of medial olivocochlear efferents. To investigate that, here we studied contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in a population of Parkinsonian patients, compared to an age-matched control group, both audiometrically tested. To rule out activation of the acoustic reflex, middle ear impedance was monitored during testing. The results show significantly stronger contralateral suppression in the patient group.

The effect of coffee on contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Background: Coffee is a popular non-alcoholic beverage consumed by humans across the world. It contains caffeine, which is a type of stimulant of the central nervous system. In the auditory system, it has a positive effect on auditory brainstem response and perception of speech in noise. Further, caffeine has an inhibitory effect in the cochlea, but studies have rarely investigated its effect on otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) in humans. OAEs are low-intensity sounds produced by the cochlea, which could be recorded in the ear canal. The present study was carried out to investigate the effect of coffee on transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) and contralateral suppression of TEOAE. Method: A total of 52 young adults participated in the study. A cross-over study design was used for the present investigation. The TEOAE and contralateral suppression of TEOAE were recorded before and after consumption of coffee and milk. The contralateral suppression of TEOAE was measured by presenting white noise to the contralateral ear at 40, 50, and 60 dB sound pressure level (SPL). Results: The mean amplitude of TEOAE before and after consumption of coffee was similar in both ears. Further, the mean contralateral suppression of TEOAE was slightly larger after consumption of coffee in both ears. However, the mean difference was not significant in both the ears. Conclusions: Based on the findings of present study, coffee has no significant effect on the amplitude of TEOAE and contralateral suppression of TEOAE.

Evaluation of the auditory findings of patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

ObjectivesTo investigate the effects of hypoxia occurring in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) on Auditory evoked late latency, Auditory brainstem response, and the contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions. Materials and methods46 patients diagnosed with OSAS were divided into groups as moderate and severe based on their Apnea Hipopnea Index (AHI) values. The control group consisted of 22 healthy individuals. All participants underwent an Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) test, Auditory Evoked Late Latency Response (LLR), and Contralateral Suppression Otoacoustic Emission (CS-OAE). FindingsThere was no statistical difference between the OSAS group and the control group regarding P1 latency, N1 latency, and P1 and N1 wave amplitude (p > 0.05). In ABR, statistically significant differences were found between the control, moderate OSAS, and severe OSAS groups in wave I in the right and left ear (p < 0.05). In the analyses performed for the otoacoustic emission frequencies with and without contralateral suppression of the right and left ear, suppression was not observed at some frequencies, and this was regarded as statistically significant (p < 0.05). ConclusionIt is considered that OSAS does not have cortical effects but impacts the brainstem region and the cochlea. Bilateral impact, especially observed in wave I of ABR, is prominent on the auditory nerve. Considering that the medial olivo-cochlear (MOC) system is affected in patients with OSAS, it is thought that these patients are inadequate in suppressing noise, and this may cause various problems, particularly the inability to distinguish speech in noisy environments.

A fast algorithm for the measurement of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves based on multi-level swept suppressor tones

Algorithms for measuring stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission (SFOAE) suppression tuning curves (STCs) typically use pure tones as suppressors, leading to procedures which are time-consuming and difficult to apply in clinical settings. A fast algorithm based on multi-level swept suppressor tones (MLSST) is proposed in this study. Taking advantage of the time-varying frequencies of swept tones, the suppression effects on SFOAE produced by swept suppressor tones are obtained within a single test. Further, a SFOAE STC may be extracted by interpolation from a set of suppression-effect functions at multiple suppressor levels. In the present study, SFOAE STCs were obtained in twenty-six normal-hearing subjects using the fast MLSST and the traditional pure-tone algorithms. SFOAE STCs were measured with high test–retest repeatability using the MLSST algorithm (average mean absolute errors of 2.12 dB) and were nearly consistent with the SFOAE STCs obtained by the pure-tone algorithm (average mean absolute errors of 3.13 dB). In addition, with>1.8 times frequency solution of the acquired curves, the measurement speed of our MLSST algorithm was approximately 2.14 times faster than the traditional one.

The Effect of Covid-19 on the Efferent Auditory System in Adults.

It was evaluated the effects of COVID-19 on the cochlea and auditory efferent system with Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission (TEOAE) and Contralateral Suppression (CS) Test in this research. We aimed to evaluate the pre- and post-COVID-19 Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission and Contralateral Suppression results in the same participants to reveal the effect of COVID-19 on the efferent auditory system. The CS measurement was performed twice for each participant before a diagnosis of COVID-19 and after treatment of COVID-19 as a within-subjects study design. All participants had normal hearing at all frequencies (≤ 25 dB HL at 0.25 - 8 kHz) and had normal middle ear functions in both ears. The tests were performed in the linear mod by using double-probe on the Otodynamics ILO292-II device. The CS of the OAEs was measured at 65 dB peSPL TEOAE stimulus and 65 dB SPL broadband noise. All parameters including reproducibility, noise, and stability were considered during the measurements. The study included 11 patients [8 female and 3 male] aged between 20 and 35 years (mean age is 26 ± 3.66). Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test and Spearman's correlation test were used for statistical analysis via Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test showed that there was no significant difference between the pre-and post-COVID-19 TEOAE CS results in all tested frequencies and measurement parameters, 1000 Hz to 4000 Hz, respectively Z= -0.356, -0.089, -0.533, -0.533, -1.156 and p<0.05. Although not statistically significant, the CS results obtained post-COVID-19 at all frequencies except 4000 Hz were lower than that pre- COVID-19. According to the overall TEOAE results after COVID-19, a statistically significant decrease was observed at 3000 Hz (Z=-2.847, p<0.01) and 4000 Hz (Z=-2.401, p<0.05) compared to the pre-measurement. The study findings show that SARS-CoV-2 can affect the cochlea and the auditory efferent system in adults. Post-COVID-19 audiological evaluation can also be considered part of the general medical examination. Covid-19, SARS-CoV-2, efferent system, contralateral suppression, otoacoustic emission.

Efferent Control in Musicians: A Review

It is widely established that musicians possess a higher level in certain auditory perceptual abilities when compared to non-musicians. This improvement may be mediated, at least in part, by changes in the cochlear response induced by reflex activation of the olivocochlear efferent system. In this review, we describe and analyze the scientific evidence regarding possible differences in the efferent response in musicians and non-musicians. The main evidence observed is that musicians present a greater robustness of the efferent olivocochlear reflex when measured by suppression of otoacoustic emissions and compared to non-musicians. Analyzing the articles presented in this review, it is possible to point out that the differential role of the efferent effect in musicians is not yet established. There is not enough evidence to support the idea that the olivocochlear system favors comparative changes in the properties of musicians' auditory filters. New studies with psychoacoustic techniques, among others, are needed to measure the effect of the olivocochlear reflex on tuning, gain, compression, or temporal resolution in musicians and non-musicians.

Short-Term and Long-Term Stability of Medial Olivocochlear Reflex in Adults with Typical Hearing.

This study aimed to assess the stability of Medial Olivocochlear Reflex (MOCR) function in typical hearing adults with the use of Contralateral Suppression (CS) of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAEs). This study included fifty-three (90ears) participants between the ages of 18-30. Participants were divided into 3 groups (Group A-daily stability, Group B-short-term stability, and Group C- long-term stability). For each group, 4 measurements (30 × 4 = 120sessions) were taken. Group A measurements were taken daily, Group B measurements were taken weekly and Group C measurements were taken monthly. DPOAEs and Contralateral Suppression of DPOAEs were measured for each group. Analyses indicated that Medial Olivocochlear Reflex (MOCR) measured through contralateral suppression of DPOAE was unstable. This result indicates a DPOAE-based measure of the MOCR was not repeated across time. A great deal has been learned using CS of DPOAEs to study medial efferent activation, but several unresolved methodological issues that could impact the data to produce poor stability across time. Those methodological issues need to be explored and researched in the future.

Gender differences in contralateral suppression of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in individuals with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders.

The current study aims to evaluate gender variations in the efferent auditory system functioning in the ANSD population and compare them to normal hearing persons using contralateral suppression of spontaneous OAE (SOAEs). For the current study, a total of 54 ears were considered prospectively. 27 ears with normal hearing (NH) sensitivity were in group I, while 27 ears with ANSD were in group II. All of the subjects had a regular audiological examination followed by synchronised SOAE recordings with and without broadband noise (in the contralateral ear) at 50dB SPL and statistical analysis was carried out. Wilcoxon signed rank test revealed a significant decrease in SOAE amplitude with contralateral noise stimulation in NH, while no such trend was observed in ANSD. However, contralateral SOAE stimulation resulted in significant high-frequency shifts for both the ANSD and NH groups in the noise condition. In the comparison of gender effects on SOAE amplitude and frequency shifts using Mann-Whitney, no significant gender differences were seen. The lack of gender differences in SOAE suppression is explained based on global standing wave theory and local oscillator theory. Contralateral effect of noise on SOAE shows frequency shifts, but not amplitude shifts both of which are not affected by gender effects.

Noise-induced hearing loss vulnerability in type III intermediate filament peripherin gene knockout mice.

In the post-natal mouse cochlea, type II spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) innervating the electromotile outer hair cells (OHCs) of the ‘cochlear amplifier' selectively express the type III intermediate filament peripherin gene (Prph). Immunolabeling showed that Prph knockout (KO) mice exhibited disruption of this (outer spiral bundle) afferent innervation, while the radial fiber (type I SGN) innervation of the inner hair cells (~95% of the SGN population) was retained. Functionality of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent innervation of the OHCs was confirmed in the PrphKO, based on suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) via direct electrical stimulation. However, “contralateral suppression” of the MOC reflex neural circuit, evident as a rapid reduction in cubic DPOAE when noise is presented to the opposite ear in wildtype mice, was substantially disrupted in the PrphKO. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements demonstrated that hearing sensitivity (thresholds and growth-functions) were indistinguishable between wildtype and PrphKO mice. Despite this comparability in sound transduction and strength of the afferent signal to the central auditory pathways, high-intensity, broadband noise exposure (108 dB SPL, 1 h) produced permanent high frequency hearing loss (24–32 kHz) in PrphKO mice but not the wildtype mice, consistent with the attenuated contralateral suppression of the PrphKO. These data support the postulate that auditory neurons expressing Prph contribute to the sensory arm of the otoprotective MOC feedback circuit.

The effect of coffee on contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions

Background: Coffee is a popular non-alcoholic beverage consumed by humans across the world. It contains caffeine, which is a type of stimulant of the central nervous system. In the auditory system, it has a positive effect on auditory brainstem response and perception of speech in noise. Further, caffeine has an inhibitory effect in the cochlea, but studies have rarely investigated its effect on otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) in humans. OAEs are low-intensity sounds produced by the cochlea, which could be recorded in the ear canal. The present study was carried out to investigate the effect of coffee on transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) and contralateral suppression of TEOAE. Method: A total of 52 young adults participated in the study. A cross-over study design was used for the present investigation. The TEOAE and contralateral suppression of TEOAE were recorded before and after consumption of coffee and milk. The contralateral suppression of TEOAE was measured by presenting white noise to the contralateral ear at 40, 50, and 60 dB sound pressure level (SPL). Results: The mean amplitude of TEOAE before and after consumption of coffee was similar in both ears. Further, the mean contralateral suppression of TEOAE was slightly larger after consumption of coffee in both ears. However, the mean difference was not significant in both the ears. Conclusions: Based on the findings of present study, coffee has no significant effect on the amplitude of TEOAE and contralateral suppression of TEOAE.

Does glutaric aciduria type 1 affect hearing function?

This study aimed to evaluate audiological findings among patients with glutaric aciduria type 1 (GA-1). We used a large test battery for the audiological evaluation of 17 individuals with GA-1 (the study group) and 20 healthy individuals (the control group). Conventional audiometry (0.125-8kHz), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) (1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8kHz), contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions, and auditory brainstem response (ABR) ( 30, 50, 70 and 90 dB nHL) were measured for all participants (n = 37). Mild sensorineural hearing loss was found in 77.47% (n = 13) of the patients with GA-1, and normal hearing thresholds were seen in 23.53% (n = 4). There were three asymptomatic patients at the time of diagnosis [two developed mild mental motor retardation (MMR) and one developed severe MMR during the follow-up], one with a normal hearing threshold and two with mild hearing loss), and 14 symptomatic patients (three with normal hearing thresholds and 11 with mild hearing loss). Seven of the symptomatic patients diagnosed following an encephalopathic crisis required intensive care and showed significantly worse hearing thresholds than those without symptoms [20.86 ± 4.47 vs. 15.44 ± 3.96 decibel hearing level (dB HL), p = 0.039*], while five had mild-to-moderate hearing loss. Acute encephalopathic crisis had a negative effect on hearing function in the symptomatic patients. The emission and contralateral suppression amplitude values of the study group were significantly lower compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The I-V interpeak latency and absolute latencies of ABR waves I, III, and V of the study group were observed to be significantly prolonged and morphologically distorted compared to those of the control group (p < 0.05). Five patients had MMR, and three had moderate MMR; all eight had mild-to-moderate hearing loss. In addition, of the eight patients with mild MMR, four had mild hearing loss. In particular, the morphological findings of ABR waves were significantly worse in the patients with severe and moderate MMR (p < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between a macrocephaly history (12 patients) and hearing loss (p = 0.041*). Magnetic resonance imaging findings were evaluated in all the 17 patients with GA-1, and typical fronto-temporal atrophy and sylvian fissure enlargement were observed. Our findings support that GA-1 is associated with auditory impairment, primarily in symptomatic patients. Adequate audiological test battery evaluation is essential in this context, particularly for symptomatic patients with a history of encephalopathic crises.

The Relationship between Contralateral Suppression of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission and Unmasking of Speech Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response

Introduction Several studies have shown that efferent pathways of the auditory system improve perception of speech-in-noise. But, the majority of investigations assessing the role of efferent pathways on speech perception have used contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions as a measure of efferent activity. By studying the effect of efferent activity on the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR), some more light could be shed on the effect of efferent pathways on the encoding of speech in the auditory pathway. Objectives To investigate the relationship between contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emission (CSTEOAE) and unmasking of speech ABR. Methods A total of 23 young adults participated in the study. The CSTEOAE was measured using linear clicks at 60 dB peSPL and white noise at 60 dB sound pressure level (SPL). The speech ABR was recorded using the syllable /da/ at 80 dB SPL in quiet, ipsilateral noise, and binaural noise conditions. In the ipsilateral noise condition, white noise was presented to the test ear at 60 dB SPL, and, in the binaural noise condition, two separate white noises were presented to both ears. Results The F0 amplitude of speech ABR was higher in quiet condition; however, the mean amplitude of F0 was not significantly different across conditions. Correlation analysis showed a significant positive correlation between the CSTEOAE and the magnitude of unmasking of F0 amplitude of speech ABR. Conclusions The findings of the present study suggests that the efferent pathways are involved in speech-in-noise processing.

The Spectral Extent of Phasic Suppression of Loudness and Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions by Infrasound and Low-Frequency Tones

We investigated the effect of a biasing tone close to 5, 15, or 30 Hz on the response to higher-frequency probe tones, behaviorally, and by measuring distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). The amplitude of the biasing tone was adjusted for criterion suppression of cubic DPOAE elicited by probe tones presented between 0.7 and 8 kHz, or criterion loudness suppression of a train of tone-pip probes in the range 0.125–8 kHz. For DPOAEs, the biasing-tone level for criterion suppression increased with probe-tone frequency by 8–9 dB/octave, consistent with an apex-to-base gradient of biasing-tone-induced basilar membrane displacement, as we verified by computational simulation. In contrast, the biasing-tone level for criterion loudness suppression increased with probe frequency by only 1–3 dB/octave, reminiscent of previously published data on low-side suppression of auditory nerve responses to characteristic frequency tones. These slopes were independent of biasing-tone frequency, but the biasing-tone sensation level required for criterion suppression was ~ 10 dB lower for the two infrasound biasing tones than for the 30-Hz biasing tone. On average, biasing-tone sensation levels as low as 5 dB were sufficient to modulate the perception of higher frequency sounds. Our results are relevant for recent debates on perceptual effects of environmental noise with very low-frequency content and might offer insight into the mechanism underlying low-side suppression.

Relationship between irregularities in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions suppression and psychophysical tuning curves.

The suppression of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) allows the objective evaluation of cochlear frequency selectivity by determining the suppression tuning curve (STC). Interestingly, some STCs have additional sidelobes at the high frequency flank, which are thought to result from interaction between the probe tone and the cochlear standing wave corresponding to the SOAE being suppressed. Sidelobes are often in regions of other neighboring SOAEs but can also occur in the absence of any other SOAE. The aim of this study was to compare STCs and psychoacoustic tuning curves (PTCs). Therefore, STCs and PTCs were measured in: (1) subjects in which the STC had a sidelobe, and (2) subjects without STC sidelobes. Additionally, PTCs were measured in subjects without SOAEs. Across participant groups, the quality factor Q10dB of the PTCs was similar, independently from whether SOAEs were present or absent. Thus, the presence of an SOAE does not provide enhanced frequency selectivity at the emission frequency. Moreover, both PTC and STC show irregularities, but these are not related in a straightforward way. This suggests that different mechanisms cause these irregularities.

Contralateral Suppression of Transient-evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Leisure Noise Exposed Individuals.

Leisure noise may have a significant impact on hearing thresholds and young adults are often exposed to loud music during leisure activities. This behavior puts them at risk of developing noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). A frequent initial indication of NIHL is reduced hearing acuity at 4 kHz. The objective of the current study was to assess the role of the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) in leisure noise-exposed individuals with and without a 4-kHz notch. Audiological evaluation, including pure-tone and immittance audiometry, was performed for 156 college-going, young adults between May 2019 to December 2019. All participants had averaged pure-tone audiometric thresholds within normal limits, bilaterally. Annual individual exposure to personal listening devices (PLDs) was calculated using the Noise Exposure Questionnaire. The participants were then categorized into exposed (with and without audiometric 4 kHz notch) and nonexposed groups. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emission amplitude and its contralateral suppression were measured using linear and nonlinear click stimuli to study the effect of leisure noise exposure on MOCR. A significantly reduced overall contralateral suppression effect in participants exposed to PLD usage (P = 0.01) in both linear and nonlinear modes. On the contrary, significantly increased suppression was observed in linear mode for the 4 kHz frequency band in the PLD-exposed group without an audiometric notch (P = 0.009), possibly suggesting an early biomarker of NIHL. Measuring contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions may be an effective tool to detect early NIHL in leisure noise-exposed individuals.

The Reliability of Contralateral Suppression of Otoacoustic Emissions Is Greater in Women than in Men.

The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) between men and women. The strength of the MOCR was measured in terms of the suppression of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) by contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS). The difference between TEOAEs with and without CAS (white noise) was calculated as raw decibel TEOAE suppression as well as normalized TEOAE suppression expressed in percent. In each subject, sets of measurements were performed twice. Reliability was evaluated by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient, the standard error of measurement, and the minimum detectable change (MDC). The study included 40 normally hearing subjects (20 men; 20 women). The estimates of MOCR for both genders were similar. Nevertheless, the reliability of the MOCR was poorer in men, with an MDC around twice that of women. This can be only partially attributed to slightly lower signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) in men, since we used strict procedures calling for high SNRs (around 20 dB on average). Furthermore, even when we compared subgroups with similar SNRs, there was still lower MOCR reliability in men.

Standardization of the TEOAE Contralateral Suppression Test in Terms of Stimulus Intensity and Contralateral Noise Duration in Individuals with Normal Hearing.

A standard method and parameter study were performed for the contralateral suppression test. Our study aimed to determine the contralateral transient-evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) suppression test method and stimulus-noise parameters that have a standard procedure and will enable the efferent system to be easily evaluated in clinics. This study was conducted in two parts with two different groups of participants as a within-subjects design. In the first part, the signal-to-noise ratio at which maximum suppression obtained was investigated with 29 participants. In the second part, the optimal contralateral noise presentation method (in terms of noise-time or noise-sweep) was examined with 21 participants. In the first part 29 young adults aged between 18 and 32 (23.03 ± 2.84), 20 females and 9 males, and in the second part 21 young adults aged between 19 and 34 years (mean age: 23.71 ± 3.48 years), 16 females and 5 males, participated in the second part. All participants had normal hearing. To obtain maximum OAE suppression, different parameters were tested with the Otodynamics ILO292-II OAE device at both parts of the study in a double-walled audiometric test booths. Multirepeated analysis of variance, pairwise comparison, Friedman test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for statistical analysis. In the first part, maximum suppression was achieved at 65 dB peSPL (decibel peak-equivalent sound pressure level) TEOAE stimulus and 65 dB SPL broadband noise. In the second part, maximum suppression was obtained in noise-time method with 30 seconds "duration." To provide standardization in clinics, it can be recommended that the contralateral suppression of OAEs was measured at 65 dB peSPL TEOAE stimulus and 65 dB SPL broadband noise in the linear stimulation mode with Otodynamics ILO 292-II double-probe OAE device. To obtain maximum suppression, the noise-time method with 30 seconds duration can be used.

Characterizing the Access of Cholinergic Antagonists to Efferent Synapses in the Inner Ear

Stimulation of cholinergic efferent neurons innervating the inner ear has profound, well-characterized effects on vestibular and auditory physiology, after activating distinct ACh receptors (AChRs) on afferents and hair cells in peripheral endorgans. Efferent-mediated fast and slow excitation of vestibular afferents are mediated by α4β2*-containing nicotinic AChRs (nAChRs) and muscarinic AChRs (mAChRs), respectively. On the auditory side, efferent-mediated suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) is mediated by α9α10nAChRs. Previous characterization of these synaptic mechanisms utilized cholinergic drugs, that when systemically administered, also reach the CNS, which may limit their utility in probing efferent function without also considering central effects. Use of peripherally-acting cholinergic drugs with local application strategies may be useful, but this approach has remained relatively unexplored. Using multiple administration routes, we performed a combination of vestibular afferent and DPOAE recordings during efferent stimulation in mouse and turtle to determine whether charged mAChR or α9α10nAChR antagonists, with little CNS entry, can still engage efferent synaptic targets in the inner ear. The charged mAChR antagonists glycopyrrolate and methscopolamine blocked efferent-mediated slow excitation of mouse vestibular afferents following intraperitoneal, middle ear, or direct perilymphatic administration. Both mAChR antagonists were effective when delivered to the middle ear, contralateral to the side of afferent recordings, suggesting they gain vascular access after first entering the perilymphatic compartment. In contrast, charged α9α10nAChR antagonists blocked efferent-mediated suppression of DPOAEs only upon direct perilymphatic application, but failed to reach efferent synapses when systemically administered. These data show that efferent mechanisms are viable targets for further characterizing drug access in the inner ear.

The comprehensive audiological evaluation in young violinists: the medial olivocochlear system, high frequency thresholds, and the auditory figure ground test.

The aim of this study was to examine whether the medial olivocochlear hearing system functions, the high frequency hearing thresholds and speech discrimination in noise performance can guide us in assessing the risk of hearing loss among violinists. It is aimed to investigate possible hearing damage that is not reflected in pure tone hearing thresholds in violinists. The participants (n = 50) who have normal hearing and the ages of 18-30 were included in this study in two groups: violinists and controls who are unrelated to music. High frequency audiometer, auditory figure ground test (AFG) for speech discrimination in noise performance, Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission (DPOAE) and contralateral suppression on DPOAE for medial olivocochlear system function tests were applied to all participants as well as routine audiological tests. The high frequency hearing thresholds were obtained higher in violinists compared to the controls. In violinists, the AFG test scores and the suppression amount at 1kHz were lower than the controls. In addition, DPOAE responses at 4-6kHz were obtained lower in violinists (p < 0.05). The reason for high frequency hearing loss, decreased DPOAE response amplitudes, and poor medial olivocochlear function in violinists can be explained by the long-term exposure to high-level noise caused by the violin, one of the closest musical instruments. Routine and comprehensive audiological follow-up is crucial for musicians.

Controlled (re)evaluation of the relationship between speech perception in noise and contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions

In people with normal hearing (NH), speech perception in noise (SPIN) improves when the speech signal is presented not gated with noise but after a delay. The medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) was thought to be involved in the neural dynamic range adaptation (NDRA) responsible for this adaptive SPIN; however, some of the recent studies do not support this hypothesis and suggest that adaptive SPIN involves the NDRA to noise-level statistics, irrespective of MOCR activation. A plausible reason for this discrepancy could be the variations and limitations of the experimental designs used in different studies. Using a relatively controlled and comprehensive study design, this study attempts to verify whether a delay between the delivery of speech and the noise improves the SPIN and whether MOCR mediates such effects. The SPIN was estimated by measuring speech reception thresholds (SRT) in noise under simultaneous-onset and delayed-onset (noise precedes speech onset by 300 ms) conditions. The SPIN in both ears was independently examined for ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral noise in women with normal hearing (N = 18; age range, 18–25 years). Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CSOAEs) was used to estimate the MOCR based cochlear gain reduction. Under all test conditions, SPIN was improved in delayed-onset than in simultaneous-onset conditions, and the mean improvement in the SRT ranged from 0.7±1.7 to 1.8±1.8 dB. No significant correlation was obtained between CSOAEs and the mean temporal improvement in SRT, suggesting that MOCR may not be a predominant mechanism for the temporal improvement in SPIN.