Support For Covalent Immobilization Research Articles

Covalent Immobilization of Aldehyde and Alcohol Dehydrogenases on Ordered Mesoporous Silicas

PurposeThis work studies the immobilization of two enzymes, the alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and the aldehyde dehydrogenase (AldDH) both from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which could be used to produce high value-added molecules from carboxylic acids embedded in anaerobic digestate.MethodsIn particular, three mesoporous siliceous materials, with different specific surface areas and pore sizes, (MSU-H, MSU-F and MCF0.75) were used as supports for covalent immobilization. The support materials were characterized by complementary techniques. Then, after a functionalization, creating a covalent bond between the enzyme and the support was performed. The specific activity and immobilization yield of the biocatalysts were then evaluated.ResultsThe best results were obtained with MSU-H and MSU-F, resulting in an immobilization yield greater than 50% in all cases, a specific activity of 0.13 IU/gsupp with the AldDH/MSU-H, 0.10 IU/gsupp with AldDH/MSU-F, 48.6 IU/gsupp with ADH/MSU-H and 12.6 IU/gsupp with ADH/MSU-H. These biocatalysts were then characterized by optimal pH and temperature and the stability factor was evaluated. With ADH/MSU-F no decrease in activity was observed after 120 h incubated at 50 °C. Finally, the biocatalysts AldDH/MSU-H and ADH/MSU-H were used to perform the reduction reaction and it was seen that after five reaction cycles the residual activity was greater than 20% in both cases.ConclusionThe ADH and AldDH enzymes have been successfully immobilized on mesoporous siliceous supports, considerably increasing their thermal stability and being able to reuse them for several reaction cycles. The use of this immobilization and these supports is adaptable to a wide variety of enzymes.Graphical

Sporopollenin as an efficient green support for covalent immobilization of a lipase

Correction for ‘Sporopollenin as an efficient green support for covalent immobilization of a lipase' by Stefânia P. de Souza et al., Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015, DOI: 10.1039/c4cy01682c.

Preparation and characterization of UV-curable polymeric support for covalent immobilization of xylanase enzyme

Abstract The hydroxyl group of poly(ethylene glycol) monoacrylate (PEGMA) was activated by 1,1′-carbonyldiimidazole (CDI) and then a xylanase enzyme was immobilized to amine active PEGMA. UV-curable polymeric support formulation was prepared by mixing the xylanase bonded PEGMA, aliphatic polyester, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) and photoinitiator. After UV irradiation, the enzymatic activity of the polymeric matrix was evaluated and compared with the corresponding free enzyme. By immobilization, the temperature resistance of the enzyme was improved and showed maximum activity at 60 °C. pH dependent activities of the free and immobilized enzymes were also investigated, and it was found that the pH of maximum activity for the free enzyme was 6.0, while for the optimal pH of the immobilized enzyme was 6.5. The immobilized enzyme retained 75% of its activity after 33 runs. The morphology of the polymeric support was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) coupled with SEM was used to explore the chemical composition. The results have confirmed the evidence of enzyme in the structure of the polymeric material.

Free vs chitosan-immobilized urease: Microenvironmental effects on enzyme inhibitions

Chitosan gel membranes were prepared by a solvent-evaporation method and used as a support for covalent immobilization of jack bean urease. The effects of the local microenvironment created by both the electrostatic potential of the polycationic support and the enzyme reaction on the inhibition of urease by phosphate buffer were investigated as a function of pH and compared with other urease competitive inhibitions. It was found that the kinetic behaviour of chitosan-immobilized urease in the inhibition is resultant of structural, diffusion limitation-related and microenvironmental factors. More importantly, it was shown that this behaviour is microenvironment-dependent when either a pH-dependence of enzyme inhibition (phosphate and F−) or electrostatic inhibitor-support repulsion (Ni2 + ) prevailed in the system. Other inhibitors uncharged that are do not show pH-dependented inhibition (boric and acetohydroxamic acids), the inhibition only depends on factors other than microenvironmental. Knowledge of such microenvironmental effects is of practical and theoretical importance in designing applications of immobilized enzymes and in clarifying the mode of action of enzymes in biological membranes in their native milieu.