Supportive Care Consultation Research Articles

Implementation of Bedaquiline, Pretomanid, and Linezolid in the United States: Experience Using a Novel All-Oral Treatment Regimen for Treatment of Rifampin-Resistant or Rifampin-Intolerant Tuberculosis Disease.

Rifampin-resistant tuberculosis is a leading cause of morbidity worldwide; only one-third of persons start treatment, and outcomes are often inadequate. Several trials demonstrate 90% efficacy using an all-oral, 6-month regimen of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid (BPaL), but significant toxicity occurred using 1200-mg linezolid. After US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2019, some US clinicians rapidly implemented BPaL using an initial 600-mg linezolid dose adjusted by serum drug concentrations and clinical monitoring. Data from US patients treated with BPaL between 14 October 2019 and 30 April 2022 were compiled and analyzed by the BPaL Implementation Group (BIG), including baseline examination and laboratory, electrocardiographic, and clinical monitoring throughout treatment and follow-up. Linezolid dosing and clinical management was provider driven, and most patients had linezolid adjusted by therapeutic drug monitoring. Of 70 patients starting BPaL, 2 changed to rifampin-based therapy, 68 (97.1%) completed BPaL, and 2 of the 68 (2.9%) experienced relapse after completion. Using an initial 600-mg linezolid dose daily adjusted by therapeutic drug monitoring and careful clinical and laboratory monitoring for adverse effects, supportive care, and expert consultation throughout BPaL treatment, 3 patients (4.4%) with hematologic toxicity and 4 (5.9%) with neurotoxicity required a change in linezolid dose or frequency. The median BPaL duration was 6 months. BPaL has transformed treatment for rifampin-resistant or intolerant tuberculosis. In this cohort, effective treatment required less than half the duration recommended in 2019 US guidelines for drug-resistant tuberculosis. Use of individualized linezolid dosing and monitoring likely enhanced safety and treatment completion. The BIG cohort demonstrates that early implementation of new tuberculosis treatments in the United States is feasible.

Palliative and Supportive Care Consultation for Patients With Malignant Gastrointestinal Obstruction is Associated With Broad Interdisciplinary Management.

The aim of this study was to assess rates of palliative care (PC) involvement in the care of patients with malignant gastrointestinal obstruction (GIO) and its influence on interdisciplinary team involvement. Malignant GIO is an advanced oncologic diagnosis with associated poor prognosis. Data regarding PC and interdisciplinary team involvement in these patients is lacking. We identified consecutive surgical consultations for GIO in cancer patients at a single institution from August 2017 to July 2019. Clinical characteristics were collected. Rates of PC consultation, ACP discussion, code status change to do not resuscitate, and interdisciplinary service consultation were evaluated. We identified 200 patients with consultations for GIO, of whom 114 (57%) had malignant GIO and were included in our study. Of these patients, 95 (83%) had stage IV disease; 68 (60%) had peritoneal metastasis, and 70 (61%) had other intra-abdominal recurrence or metastasis. PC consultation was obtained in 69 patients (61%). PC consultation was associated with higher rates of ACP discussion (64% vs 29%; P < 0.001), code status change to do not resuscitate (30% vs 2%; P < 0.001), nonsurgical procedure (46% vs 11%; P < 0.001), discharge to hospice (30% vs 7%; P < 0.001), and involvement of spiritual care (48% vs 22%; P = 0.01), social work (77% vs 42%, P < 0.001), psychology/psychiatry (42% vs 4%, P < 0.001), nutrition (86% vs 62%, P = 0.006), physical therapy (54% vs 31%, P = 0.02), and occupational therapy (42% vs 16%, P = 0.004). PC consultation benefits patients with malignant GIO by facilitating comprehensive interdisciplinary care, ACP discussions, and transition to hospice care, where appropriate. Diagnosis of malignant GIO should be a trigger for PC consultation or, in facilities with limited PC resources, consideration of deliberately broad interdisciplinary consultation.

S2001 Chronic Norovirus Infection in a Double Solid Organ Transplant Patient

Introduction: Infectious diarrhea is a common complication in the postoperative course of a solid organ transplant (SOT) recipient. While self-limiting in immunocompetent patients, transplant patients on long-term immunosuppression can have severe, prolonged disease with significant morbidity. We present a case of chronic diarrhea due to recurrent norovirus infection in a double SOT patient to encourage early recognition. Case Description/Methods: A 61-year-old male presented with 35-pound weight loss despite a good appetite and large-volume watery diarrhea intermittently for 2 years. He had a liver-kidney transplant 14 years prior secondary to cryptogenic cirrhosis and renal cell carcinoma. Immunosuppression consisted of prednisone, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Stool PCR was positive for norovirus and negative for other viruses, bacteria, and parasites. His MMF dose was reduced with no benefit. He was discharged with supportive care with initial improvement in the diarrhea but returned to the hospital 4 other times with worsening diarrhea and weight loss. Infectious workup was persistently positive for norovirus. Bi-directional endoscopy with biopsies revealed colonic mucosa with rare epithelial apoptosis, chronic duodenitis, and increased intraepithelial lymphocytosis in the duodenum and ileum consistent with chronic norovirus (Figure). The full diagnostic workup is detailed in Table 1. He was managed conservatively during each hospitalization with fluids and antimotility agents and recently discharged home with plans to start nitazoxanide outpatient. Discussion: Norovirus infection among SOT patients can lead to severe and symptomatic chronic infection. Patients can develop dehydration, transplant rejection, and malnutrition making them higher risk for hospitalizations and death. It is unclear why some immunocompromised patients recover spontaneously while others demonstrate a protracted course but supportive care is the mainstay of therapy. Limited case series have shown nitazoxanide to be effective in treating SOT patients with chronic norovirus infection. However, nitazoxanide needs to be continued until stool RNA studies become negative. This case highlights the importance of considering chronic norovirus when a SOT patient presents with chronic diarrhea and weight loss. Early initiation of supportive care and nutrition consultation are imperative in reducing morbidity in these patients. Nitazoxanide can be effective in patients that are refractory to supportive therapy.Figure 1.: Duodenal biopsy (A): Focal intraepithelial lymphocytosis and lamina propria plasma cell infiltrates. Terminal ileum biopsies (B,C): Focal intraepithelial lymphocytosis and lamina propria plasma cell infiltrates (B); popcorn-like epithelial apoptosis (C). Table 1. - Diagnostic Workup Test/Procedure Result Creatinine, serum 2.1 mg/dl (baseline 1 mg/dl) Stool PCR -Positive for norovirus-Negative for Clostridium difficile toxins, Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, and Campylobacter Osmolality, feces 420 mOsm/kg Fecal fat Abnormal Duodenal biopsy -Mucosa with intraepithelial lymphocytosis, dense plasma cell infiltrates in the lamina propria, and rare apoptotic bodies-Negative for CMV, EBV, HSV Stomach biopsy -Gastric antral and oxyntic gland mucosa with chronic inactive gastritis-Negative for H. pylori Right colon biopsy Rare epithelial apoptosis Left colon biopsy Rare epithelial apoptosis Terminal ileum biopsy Mucosa with intraepithelial lymphocytosis, dense plasma cell infiltrates in lamina propria, and rare apoptotic bodies

EP10.01-008 Examining Social Determinants of Health Among Newly Diagnosed Lung Cancer Patients Contacted for Early Specialist Palliative Care Consultation

Timely palliative care interventions can help to alleviate the distress people experience after diagnosis of an incurable, life-threatening cancer. However, referrals to palliative care are often late and inequities have been described across sociodemographic groups. The Palliative Care Early and Systematic (PaCES)-Automatic study was co-designed with patients and providers. It provides an automatic early palliative care intervention triggered by pre-determined clinical criteria, without the need for formal clinician referral, for automatically offering an early supportive and palliative care (SPC) consultation to all patients newly diagnosed with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Frequency and characteristics of advanced cancer patients with COVID + ve status among inpatient supportive care consults during the pandemic: experience from a tertiary cancer center.

PurposeThere is limited literature available regards the frequency and characteristics of COVID-19 + ve status among advanced cancer patients referred to an inpatient supportive care consultation(PC) at a tertiary cancer center. Our study aimed to determine the frequency and characteristics of COVID-19 + ve cancer patients seen by PC.MethodsAdvanced cancer patients seen as a consult by PC between June 15 and September 25, 2020, at MD Anderson Cancer Center were eligible for the study. We evaluated the patient demographics, clinical characteristics including symptoms(ESAS), delirium(MDAS), COVID + status prior to, and after PC referral(converters), and type of PC delivery(in person or virtual care).ResultsSixty-six out of 1380 (4.8%) PC consults were COVID-19 + ve: 42 prior to PC (79%), and 14 (21%) were COVID-19 + ve after the PC (converters). COVID-19 + PC patients had lower depression (P = .035), spiritual distress (P = .003), and were more seen frequently virtually (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between COVID-19-ve patients and converters. Converters had higher symptom distress (P = 0.007), lower delirium (P = 0.014), and were referred earlier (P = .011) compared to COVID + PC patients diagnosed prior to PC consult. Overall, patients seen virtually compared in-person by PC were younger (P = 0.02) and had lower delirium (P = 0.007).ConclusionThe burden of COVID-19 + status among patients referred to PC was low. COVID-19 + ve patients had more frequent virtual visits, lower depression, and spiritual distress scores. Patient seen virtually were significantly younger and had lower delirium. During a new pandemic, universal virtual care might be emphasized especially at initial encounters after admission and further research is needed on the potential efficacy of this intervention.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-021-06525-x.

The development of a nomogram to determine the frequency of elevated risk for non-medical opioid use in cancer patients.

Non-medical opioid use (NMOU) is a growing crisis. Cancer patients at elevated risk of NMOU (+risk) are frequently underdiagnosed. The aim of this paper was to develop a nomogram to predict the probability of +risk among cancer patients receiving outpatient supportive care consultation at a comprehensive cancer center. 3,588 consecutive patients referred to a supportive care clinic were reviewed. All patients had a diagnosis of cancer and were on opioids for pain. All patients were assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain (SOAPP-14), and CAGE-AID (Cut Down-Annoyed-Guilty-Eye Opener) questionnaires. "+risk" was defined as an SOAPP-14 score of ≥7. A nomogram was devised based on the risk factors determined by the multivariate logistic regression model to estimate the probability of +risk. 731/3,588 consults were +risk. +risk was significantly associated with gender, race, marital status, smoking status, depression, anxiety, financial distress, MEDD (morphine equivalent daily dose), and CAGE-AID score. The C-index was 0.8. A nomogram was developed and can be accessed at https://is.gd/soappnomogram. For example, for a male Hispanic patient, married, never smoked, with ESAS scores for depression = 3, anxiety = 3, financial distress = 7, a CAGE score of 0, and an MEDD score of 20, the total score is 9 + 9+0 + 0+6 + 10 + 23 + 0+1 = 58. A nomogram score of 58 indicates the probability of +risk of 0.1. We established a practical nomogram to assess the +risk. The application of a nomogram based on routinely collected clinical data can help clinicians establish patients with +risk and positively impact care planning.

The development of a nomogram to determine the risk for inappropriate opioid use in cancer patients.

11602 Background: Non-Medical opioid use is a growing crisis. Cancer patients at risk of harmful use of prescribed opioids are frequently underdiagnosed. The aim was to develop a nomogram to predict the probability of occurrence of Inappropriate opioid use that is, presence of SOAPP ≥ 7) among patients receiving outpatient supportive care consultation at a comprehensive cancer center. Methods: 3588 consecutive cancer patients referred to a supportive care clinic from March 1, 2016 to July 15, 2018 were reviewed. Patients were eligible if they had diagnosis of cancer, and were on opioids for pain for at least a week. All patients were assessed using Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale with spiritual pain and financial distress (ESAS-FS), MEDD (morphine equivalent daily dose), SOAPP-14 (validated questionnaire for assessment of risk of inappropriate opioid use, and CAGE-AID (screening questionnaire for alcoholism/substance use disorder). Patients at with SOAPP+ were defined by SOAPP score ≥7. A nomogram was devised based on the risk factors determined in the multivariate logistic regression model and it can be used to estimate the probability of inappropriate opioid use. Results: Median age was 62yrs. Median ESAS pain item score on consultation was 5, Median ECOG was 2.20.4% were SOAPP+ and 10.1% were CAGE-AID+. SOAPP+ was significantly associated with gender, race, marital status, smoking status, depression, anxiety, financial distress, MEDD and CAGE score. The C-index is 0.8(CI 0.78, 0.82). A nomogram was developed. For example, for a male Hispanic patient, who is married, never smoked, with the following ESAS scores: (depression = 3, anxiety = 3, financial distress = 8), CAGE score of 0, and MEDD of 20, the total score is 9+9+0+0+6+10+26+0+1 = 61. In the nomogram a score of 58 indicates the probability of inappropriate opioid use being 0.1 and a score of 88 indicates the probability of 0.2. Based on the patient’s total score of 61, the probability of his aberrant behavior is between 10% to 20% (close to 10%). Conclusions: A nomogram can predict the risk of inappropriate opioid use in cancer patients.

Patients' Perspective of Timeliness and Usefulness of an Outpatient Supportive Care Referral at a Comprehensive Cancer Center

ContextCurrent guidelines recommend early referral to palliative care for patients with advanced cancer; however, no studies have examined the optimal timing of referral from the patients' perspective. ObjectivesTo examine patients' perceptions of timeliness of referral and its association with survival among patients with advanced cancer referred to an outpatient supportive care (SC) clinic. MethodsThis cross-sectional prospective study in an SC clinic at a comprehensive cancer center included patients aged 18 years or older with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic cancer. Patients were asked to complete an anonymous survey regarding the timeliness and perceived usefulness of SC referral within four weeks of their first SC consultation. ResultsOf 253 eligible patients, 209 (83%) enrolled in the study and 200 completed the survey. Median survival was 10.3 months. Most patients (72%) perceived that referral occurred “just in time,” whereas 21% felt it was “late,” and 7% felt “early.” A majority (83%) found the referral useful, and 88% would recommend it to other patients with cancer. The perception of being referred early was associated with lower reported levels of pain (P = 0.043), fatigue (P = 0.004), drowsiness (P = 0.005), appetite loss (P = 0.041), poor well-being (P = 0.041), and lower physical (P = 0.001) and overall symptom distress (P = 0.001). No other associations were found between perceived timeliness and usefulness and patients' baseline characteristics. ConclusionMost patients with a median survival of 10 months perceived that SC referral was timely and useful. Patient care needs rather than the timing of advanced cancer diagnosis drove this perception of referral timing. Lower symptom burden was associated with the perception of being referred to early.

Characteristics of Peri-Transplant Palliative Supportive Care Consultation Among Older Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients

Background Recent studies have shown that provision of palliative care (PC) simultaneously with hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is feasible and effective in improving symptom burden and improving mood during and in the first 6 months after transplant. However, given the scarce PC resource, it is important to explore the population of HCT patients who will benefit the most from subspecialty PC and its optimal timing. Methods We retrospectively examined all peri-transplant palliative supportive care consultations for patients aged 60 years and older who underwent first allo-HCT at our institution from 2001 to 2017 through chart review. We included all PC consultations from 6 months prior to and 6 months following HCT and systemically characterized each individual consultation. Predictors and potential impact of PC consultations were analyzed. Results 70 patients (11%) among a total of 610 patients, received a PC consultation during the period and were included. Table 1 depicts the baseline clinical and transplant characteristics. The median time of PC consultation from HCT was 14.5 days and there were 9 consultations prior to HCT. The majority of PC consultation, 86%, were conducted as inpatient; and 91% were initiated by the transplant team. The primary consult reason was overwhelmingly pain management, 77%, followed by the management other symptoms, goals of care discussion, and end-of-life care. In 17 patients, 24%, additional palliative care needs were identified by the consult team. The median number of visits was 5 (range 1-23). Only three patients had outpatient follow-up after initial inpatient consultation. By June 30, 2018, 48 patients, 69%, had died. The median time from PC consultation to death was 37.5 days, with 5 patients, 10%, enrolled in hospice prior to death. We are examining independent association of pre-transplant variables with PC consultations and their impact on HCT outcomes. Conclusions While limited by its retrospective nature, this study provides an overview of PC consult utilization in an older cohort of allogeneic HCT patients, which is likely the most symptomatic population with the highest risk for adverse outcomes. These results suggest that the transplant team may not have utilized the subspecialty PC consult to its complete potential. Future studies will attempt to prospectively assess patient reported outcomes and the impact of interdisciplinary PC consult team.

Comparison of Quality Oncology Practice Initiative Metrics in Solid Tumor Oncology Clinic With or Without Concomitant Supportive Oncology Consultation.

The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) is a quality measurement and improvement program designed to assess practice performance for various consensus-based and evidence-based measures. In this study, we evaluated differences in QOPI metrics met among patients with advanced solid cancer receiving routine oncologic care alone (routine care) compared with patients receiving integrated oncology and specialty-level palliative care (supportive care). We conducted a retrospective chart review of 100 randomly selected patients treated between June 2013 and June 2015 from our supportive care group and matched these patients to 100 routine care group patients on the basis of tumor type and initial oncology visit date. We used the electronic medical record to collect data regarding patient demographics, palliative care-specific QOPI metrics, intensive care unit admissions, and hospice enrollment. We performed multivariate analysis comparing differences between the two groups. A total of 200 patients were included. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. Supportive care consultation improved the absolute number of QOPI metrics met ( P = .01). The QOPI metrics more likely to be met included the following: pain appropriately addressed ( P < .01), advance care directives documented by third office visit ( P < .01), and longer hospice enrollment ( P < .01). Integrating palliative care consultation with routine oncologic care improved pain management and end-of-life planning and care. Properly addressing pain and guiding advance care discussions require specialized skills. These data support the need for increased primary palliative care education for oncologists and further development of supportive oncology practices.

An association between tobacco smoking, daily opioid use, pain response and the risk for aberrant opioid use behaviors.

226 Background: Opioid misuse is a growing crisis. Cancer patients at risk of aberrant drug behaviors are frequently underdiagnosed. Primary aim was to determine the association between current tobacco smoking, daily opioid use, pain response, and risk for aberrant opioid use behaviors (AOB) among patients receiving outpatient supportive care consultation at a comprehensive cancer center. Methods: 1,501 consecutive cancer patients referred to a supportive care clinic from March 1, 2016 to June 6, 2018 were reviewed. Patients were eligible if they had diagnosis of cancer, and were on opioids for pain for at least a week. All patients were assessed using Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), SOAPP-14 (validated questionnaire for assessment of risk for aberrant opioid use behaviors), and CAGE-AID. Patients with AOB (SOAPP+) were defined by SOAPP score ≥7. Results: Median age was 61yrs. Median ESAS pain item score on consultation was 5. Median ECOG was 2. Never smokers, previous smokers, and current smokers were 54%, 40%, and 6.6% respectively. 16.8% were AOB+ and 10.1% were CAGE-AID+. There was no significant difference in ESAS pain response at first follow-up between AOB+ versus AOB negative. Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (MEDD) in AOB+ never smokers versus previous smokers versus current smokers was 45 mg versus 60 mg versus 75mg respectively (P=0.03). Table 1 shows that male pts and those with current or previous smoking history, anxiety, and prior alcoholism/illicit drug use are at increased risk of AOB. Conclusions: Male patients and those with history of current or previous smoking history, anxiety, and prior alcoholism/illicit drug use are at increased risk of AOB. [Table: see text]

The stability and variations in the reporting of the CAGE-AID screening questionnaire in cancer patients.

224 Background: The CAGE-AID questionnaire (CA) is a 4-item patient reported validated screening tool has been used to assess risk of aberrant drug related behaviors in cancer patients receiving opioids. Consistency of responses to the CA between settings is lacking. We evaluated the frequency of CA positivity in each setting and change in score (+ or -) between the first inpatient supportive care consultation and the first outpatient follow up visit within 3 months. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted to ascertain CA scores and clinical and demographic characteristics of consecutive adult patients who were initially seen during inpatient consultation (T1) and had an outpatient follow up within 3 months (T2). CA positivity was defined as a score of ≥2 in males or ≥1 in females, with score at T2 considered the gold standard. Results: ±SD) was 122 mg (150) at T2. CA was completed for 87% of T1 patients and 94% at T2. Scores are noted below. Hispanics (23%) were more likely to be CA positive as compared with Caucasians (15%) and African Americans (11%), p= 0.02. Between T1 and T2, CA score changed from negative to positive in 4% and positive to negative in 1% of patients. The Kappa coefficient for agreement of CA between T1 and T2 was 0.74 (0.62, 0.86), p= 0.02. Conclusions: The rate of completion and consistency of patient responses to the CA was high irrespective of clinical setting. Between 10-13% of patients with advanced cancer are at increased risk for aberrant opioid use. Further studies are needed to evaluate the reasons for a change in CA scores between T1 to T2 in some patients so as not to miss those at higher risk for aberrant behaviors in need of additional monitoring and support. [Table: see text]

Predicting the risk for aberrant opioid use behavior in patients receiving outpatient supportive care consultation at a comprehensive cancer center.

Opioid misuse is a growing crisis. Patients with cancer who are at risk of aberrant drug behaviors are frequently underdiagnosed. The primary objective of this study was to determine the frequency and factors predicting a risk for aberrant opioid and drug use behaviors (ADB) among patients who received an outpatient supportive care consultation at a comprehensive cancer center. In addition, the screening performance of the Cut Down-Annoyed-Guilty-Eye Opener (CAGE) questionnaire adapted to include drug use (CAGE-AID) was compared with that of the 14-item Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain (SOAPP-14) tool as instruments for identifying patients at risk for ADB. In total, 751 consecutive patients with cancer who were referred to a supportive care clinic were reviewed. Patients were eligible if they had diagnosis of cancer and had received opioids for pain for at least 1 week. All patients were assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), the SOAPP-14, and the CAGE-AID. SOAPP scores ≥7 (SOAPP-positive) were used to identify patients who were at risk of ADB. Among the 729 of 751 (97%) evaluable consults, 143 (19.6%) were SOAPP-positive, and 73 (10.5%) were CAGE-AID-positive. Multivariate analysis revealed that the odds ratio of a positive SOAPP score was 2.3 for patients who had positive CAGE-AID scores (P < .0001), 2.08 for men (P = .0013), 1.10 per point for ESAS pain (P = .014), 1.13 per point for ESAS anxiety (P = .0015), and 1.09 per point for ESAS financial distress (P = .012). A CAGE-AID cutoff score of 1 in 4 had 43.3% sensitivity and 90.93% specificity for screening patients with a high risk of ADB. The current results indicate a high frequency of an elevated risk of ADB among patients with cancer. Men and patients who have anxiety, financial distress, and a prior history of alcoholism/illicit drug use are at increased risk of ADB.

Frequency and factors predicting the risk for aberrant opioid use in patients receiving outpatient palliative care at a comprehensive cancer center.

228 Background: Opioid misuse is a growing crisis among patients with chronic pain. Cancer patients at risk of aberrant drug behaviors (ADB) are frequently underdiagnosed in routine cancer care. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and factors predicting risk for Aberrant Opioid and Drug use among Patients receiving Outpatient Supportive Care Consultation at a Comprehensive Cancer Center Methods: In this retrospective study, 690 consecutive patients referred to a supportive care clinic were reviewed. Patients were eligible if they were ≥18 years, had a diagnosis of cancer, and were on opioids for pain for atleast a week. All patients were assessed with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), SOAPP-14, and CAGE-AID. At risk patients with aberrant opioid behavior (+Risk) was defined as SOAPP-14 score ≥7. Descriptive statistics, spearman correlation coefficient, multivariate analysis were performed. Results: 690/752 consults were eligible. A total of 135(20%)were +risk. 69(11%) were CAGE-AID +.SOAPP-14 scores were positively associated with CAGE-AID p &lt; 0.001; male gender p = 0.007; ESAS pain p = &lt; 0.006; ESAS depression p &lt; 0.001; ESAS anxiety, p &lt; 0.001, and ESAS financial distress p = &lt; 0.001. Multivariate analysis indicated that the odds ratio for +Risk was 2.47 in patients with CAGE-AID+ (p &lt; 0.001), 1.95 for male gender (p = 0.005), 1.11 per point for ESAS anxiety (p = 0.019), and 1.1 per point. for ESAS financial distress (p = 0.02). Conclusions: 20% of cancer patients on opioids presenting to supportive care center are at risk of aberrant drug behavior. Male patients with anxiety, financial distress, and prior alcoholism/illicit drug use are significant predictors of +Risk. Further research to effectively manage these patients is needed.

Psychometric Properties of the French Adaptation of the Basic Documentation for Psycho-Oncology (Po-Bado): A Distress Screening Tool

We translated and adapted the French version of the Basic Documentation for Psycho-Oncology (Po-Bado standard version) and we report its psychometric properties. The Po-Bado is a 12-item documentation instrument that measures psychosocial burden in cancer patients (all types and stages). The intensity of a patient’s psychological suffering is evaluated by a health care professional (e.g., doctor, psychologist, nurse) in a semiguided interview. Overall, 252 cancer patients (Mage = 57 years, SD = 12.8 years) participated, completing the Po-Bado during a supportive care consultation following initial diagnosis. Our results show good reliability of the Po-Bado scores, with high internal consistency and interrater coefficients. Low temporal stability indicated that the Po-Bado measures a state-like phenomenon (vs. trait-like). Validity analysis showed significant correlations between cancer-specific psychosocial burden and negative mood (i.e., depression, anxiety) and psychological disturbance as assessed by the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Confirmatory factor analysis validated the Po-Bado’s two-factor structure (i.e., somatic and psychological burdens). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve determined the optimal cutoff score of 7.5. These results suggest that the Po-Bado is an easily applicable tool for clinicians and researchers to screen effectively for psychosocial burden in oncology.

Effect of supportive care consultation on reducing 30-day readmissions to oncology inpatient services at an academic hospital.

181 Background: Decreasing 30-day hospital readmissions is an important quality care measure and signifies high-quality care. This study seeks to identify the benefits of Supportive Care consultations on 30-day readmissions to oncology inpatient services in an academic hospital. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients that had at least one 30-day readmission to the medical oncology or hematological malignancy service during a 2 year period (2011-2012). Data was collected on age, sex, cancer type, stage, number of readmissions, and presence of inpatient Supportive Care consultation. Results: During the study period 410 patients were identified with at least one 30-day readmission to an oncology service. Patients with a supportive care consult, 111 (27.7%), had an average of 2.5 readmissions and patients without a consultation, 299 (72.9%), had an average of 2.0 readmissions (p = 0.014). After Supportive Care consultation a reduction of 0.87 admissions (p &lt; 0.001) was observed. Stage IV disease was observed in 203 (49.5%) of patients studied. Conclusions: Supportive Care is often consulted for patients with significant symptoms and suffering during advanced illness. The higher observed average readmissions in patients seen by Supportive Care may reflect the complex assistance needed by this patient population. This study demonstrates a benefit of Supportive Care consultation in reducing 30-day readmissions after consultation.

Pretransplantation Supportive and Palliative Care Consultation for High-Risk Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Patients

Early palliative care (EPC) for patients with metastatic solid tumors is now standard of care, but the effect of EPC in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is less well understood. We studied the acceptability of pre-HCT EPC as measured by trial participation, changes in patient-reported outcomes, and follow-up with palliative care providers. English-speaking adults (age >17 years) with an HCT comorbidity index of ≥ 3, relapse risk > 25%, or planned HLA-mismatched allogeneic or myeloablative HCT received EPC before HCT admission with monthly or more frequent visits. Twenty-two (69%) of 32 subjects provided consent; 2 were later excluded (HCT cancelled, consent retracted) for a 63% participation rate. Comfort with EPC was high (82% very comfortable). Subjects reported stable or improved mood and sense of hope, without apparent negative effects with a median of 3 visits. Follow-up surveys were returned by 75% of participants at 60 days and by 65% at 90 days. Four (20%) were admitted to the intensive care unit before day 100 and 3 (15%) received life-support measures. Five (25%) died with median follow-up of 14 months. EPC is feasible, acceptable, and has the potential to improve the HCT experience, whether or not the patient survives. EPC for HCT patients should be tested in a randomized trial.

Self-reported sleep disturbance in patients with advanced cancer: Frequency, intensity, and factors associated with response to outpatient supportive care consultation — A preliminary report

Self-reported sleep disturbance (SD) is a distressing symptom in patients with advanced cancer. There are limited data on the treatment of SD and predictors to response of SD to outpatient supportive care clinic (OPC) consultation. The aims of our study was to determine the frequency, intensity, and correlates of SD as assessed with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) sleep item at the time of initial consultation and identify the predictors of improvement in SD at follow-up. We reviewed the records of consecutive patients with advanced cancer presenting to the OPC. ESAS scores were obtained at the initial and subsequent visits between January 2008 and February 2010. All patients underwent screening for SD (0-10 scale: 0 = best sleep, presence of SD defined as ≥ 3) and interdisciplinary assessment and treatment, including drug review, counseling, sleep hygiene review, and drug therapy. A response was defined as a 1-point improvement at the follow-up visit on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) sleep item score. Baseline patient characteristics, medication use, and ESAS scores were analyzed to determine their association with response. The median age was 58 years, and 53% of patients were men. The most common cancer type was head and neck or lung (36%). Of the 442 patients, 330 had baseline SD (score ≥ 3/10, 75%). Median and mean (standard deviation) baseline SD scores were 5 and 5.1 (2.9). The multivariable regression model found the intensity of baseline ESAS sleep item scores to be associated with baseline sedative use, baseline ESAS pain scores, baseline ESAS fatigue scores, baseline ESAS feeling of well-being scores, and sedative use (R 2 = 0.22). Sleep disturbance response at first follow-up was seen in 196 of 330 patients (59%). Moderate to high SD score and anxiety at initial visit with odds ratios (OR) of 2.53 (p = 0.0007) and 1.59 (p = 0.048), respectively, were associated with a response. Both the frequency and severity of SD were high. Response to supportive care consultation was substantial. The severity of SD and anxiety at the initial visit predicted a response at first follow-up. Further research is needed.

‘Watchful waiting’ or ‘active monitoring’ in depression management in primary care: Exploring the recalled content of general practitioner consultations

BackgroundCurrent NICE depression guidelines recommend a period of ‘active monitoring’ prior to commencing treatment with antidepressants. The content of consultations during active monitoring or supportive care has not been previously prescribed. MethodsAs part of a randomised trial of supportive care versus supportive care plus SSRI consultation content was measured through patient recall for the purpose of testing equity in content between trial arms. An exploratory analysis of the consultation content measure is presented together with a measure of consultation satisfaction (MISS) and depression severity (HMRD). A score for ‘psychoactive consultation content’ (PSAC) was generated to enable comparison between groups. Results220 patients were randomised in the study. The majority of participants recalled a discussion of practical problems they faced and many reported some element of problem solving; a significant minority reported discussions about changing the way they thought, addressing relationships or talking to trusted friends or family. Consultation content was unrelated to depression outcome although in multivariate analysis it was strongly related to consultation satisfaction. LimitationsThis is a secondary analysis based on patient recall of consultation content. ConclusionsSupportive care is not a passive process as patients report several potentially therapeutic discussions within the consultation and these occur regardless of whether antidepressants are prescribed. It is not known whether these discussions do have any therapeutic value in this context. Consultation content was unrelated to outcome in this study but did predict satisfaction with the consultation. Further work is required to validate the patient report of consultation content and to identify what if any consultation strategies have therapeutic effect.

I will always be with you: Traditional and complementary therapists’ perspectives on patient–therapist–doctor communication regarding treatment of Arab patients with cancer in Israel

ObjectiveIn 2008, an Integrative Oncology Program was implemented at the Clalit Oncology Service in Haifa, Israel, to promote patients’ well-being during chemotherapy and advanced stages of disease. We hypothesized that studying the perceptions of Arab complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapists would facilitate development of a cross-culturally integrative oncology approach. MethodsSemi-structured interviews were held with 27 Arab therapists who use medicinal herbs, the Quran and various CAM modalities, with the aim of characterizing their treatment practices and learning about their perspectives regarding conventional cancer care. ResultsThematic analysis revealed that therapists act as go-betweens, mediating between patients and conventional physicians. Therapists translate diagnoses into Arabic and elucidate key concepts. They tend to perceive their role as gatekeepers accompanying patients through the conventional health system, referring them for further examinations, and providing CAM-based supportive care consultation. ConclusionsCAM therapists have an essential role in supportive care of Arab patients with cancer. Triangular patient–therapist–oncologist communication may have an impact on patients’ experience and treatment quality. Practice implicationsRecognition of CAM therapists as mediators between patients’ health beliefs and conventional perceptions of care may improve doctor–patient dialogue and facilitate supportive care provision in a cross-cultural context.