Support Team Assessment Schedule Research Articles

Transitional Changes of Anxiety, Pain and Other Symptoms in Cancer Patients Admitted to a Palliative Care Unit, Evaluated Using the Support Team Assessment Schedule - Japanese Version.

Objective: Association between physical symptoms and psychosocial difficulties of cancer patients has been reported widely. Nevertheless, the effects of pain and other symptom control on anxiety in such patients have not been investigated well. We investigated the association of improvement of pain and other symptoms with patient anxiety, and assessed factors associated with improvement of such symptoms. Methods: Data of patients with advanced cancer admitted to a palliative care unit during August 2018 - June 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Severity of pain, other symptoms, and anxiety was assessed by the Support Team Assessment Schedule Japanese version (STAS-J) administered at admission and after 2weeks. Patients' physical data, their Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI) at admission, and their overall survival were collected and recorded. Results: Data of 701 patients were analyzed. Improvement of pain or other symptoms after 2weeks was not associated with the PPI total score or actual survival (P = .105 and .999). Patients with higher anxiety on admission experienced improvement of pain or other symptoms more frequently (P = .005). Worsening of anxiety was observed less in patients who experienced improvement in pain or other symptoms after 2weeks (P = .027). Conclusion: Pain or other symptoms of patients with advanced cancer was improved irrespective of the general condition indicated with actual survival and prognosis-predictive factors. These findings suggest the importance of pain and other symptoms' improvement and its important roles in the management of patient psychosocial problems such as anxiety.

Effectiveness of opioid switching for dyspnea and its predictors in cancer patients: a single-center retrospective observational study.

Morphine is the most used opioid for dyspnea, but other opioids such as oxycodone and fentanyl are increasingly used, and opioid switching to these is sometimes undertaken. No studies have verified the effectiveness of opioid switching for relief of dyspnea. We retrospectively investigated the effectiveness of opioid switching for dyspnea and its predictors. All patients with opioid switching for dyspnea during hospitalization at Komaki City Hospital from January 2019 to August 2022 were included. Opioid switching was defined as a change to another opioid, and the assessment period for evaluating the effectiveness and adverse events of opioid switching was set as 1week. Patients with Numeric Rating Scale or Japanese version of the Support Team Assessment Schedule reduction for dyspnea of at least 1, or with clear improvement based on medical records, were considered valid. Mitigating factors for dyspnea were identified using logistic regression analysis. Of the 976 patients with opioid switching, 57 patients had opioid switching for relief of dyspnea. Of these, opioid switching was effective in 21 patients (36.8%). In a multivariate analysis, older patients (odds ratio: 5.52, 95% CI: 1.50-20.20, P<0.01), short prognosis for post-opioid switching (odds ratio: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.04-0.87, P=0.03) and cachexia (odds ratio: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02-0.64, P<0.01) were significantly associated with opioid switching effects for dyspnea. There were no serious adverse events after opioid switching. This study indicates that opioid switching for dyspnea may have some effect. Furthermore, opioid switching for dyspnea may be more effective in older patients and less effective in terminally ill patients or in those with cachexia.

Effectiveness and safety of morphine administration for refractory dyspnoea among hospitalised patients with advanced heart failure: the Morphine-HF study

ObjectivesMorphine is effective in alleviating dyspnoea in patients with cancer. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of morphine administration for refractory dyspnoea in patients with advanced heart failure...

The needs of patients with noncancer diseases and their families from hospital-based specialized palliative care teams in Japan.

Hospital-based specialized palliative care teams (HSPC) are important for symptom management and ethics support, especially during complex decision-making, but the needs of patients with noncancer diseases and their families from the HSPC are unclear. This study aimed to (I) compare the prevalence of symptom between patients with and without cancer and explore changes in symptom intensity after HSPC consultation in patients with noncancer; (II) determine factors related to ethics support; and (III) compare the percentage of request contents from patients and their families when a certified nurse specialist in gerontological nursing (geriatric care nurse below) is present in the HSPC to that when a certified nurse specialist in palliative care (palliative care nurse below) is present in the HSPC. We utilized a retrospective cohort study to analyze 761 patients (360 with noncancer and 401 with cancer) referred to our HSPC at the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology using 10-year data (since 2011) available in an electronic medical record database. (I) Symptom scores of the Support Team Assessment Schedule were compared between noncancer and cancer groups and between initial and 1-week assessments for noncancer patients. (II) Ethics support was compared between noncancer (including dementia) and cancer. The presence or absence of ethics support requests, which was set as the objective variable, was examined using logistic regression analysis. (III) The percentage of request contents selected from nine items defaulted on the electronic medical record when a geriatric care nurse was present in our HSPC were compared to those when a palliative care nurse was present in our HSPC. Compared to those with cancer, patients with noncancer suffered more from dyspnea and sputum accumulation. More than 10% of patients with noncancer had suffered from pain, dyspnea, sputum accumulation, and anorexia that required treatment, with symptom scores showing improvement after 1 week of HSPC involvement, except for the sputum accumulation. Moreover, for anorexia, symptom scores improved, but >10% of these patients continued to suffer. Patients with noncancer diseases, including dementia, received ethics support than those with cancer without dementia. More requests for ethics support were received when a geriatric care nurse was in the HSPC than when a palliative care nurse was in the HSPC. Logistic regression analysis revealed that requests for ethics support were more frequent from patients or families with impaired decision-making capacity or when the patient lacked an advocate. The needs of patients with noncancer diseases and families from the HSPC in Japan included (I) symptom management for intractable conditions, such as sputum accumulation; (II) ethics support for patients with noncancer diseases, including dementia, with impaired decision-making capacity, and without advocates; and (III) advice on ethics issues from a geriatric care nurse.

Palliative Care Outcome Scale Assessment for Cancer Patients Eligible for Palliative Care: Perspectives on the Relationship between Patient-Reported Outcome and Objective Assessments.

(1) Background: The importance of patient-reported outcome (PRO), i.e., prioritizing patient voice, has increased in cancer treatment, as well as palliative and supportive settings. The Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS), a hybrid evaluation consisting of “patient evaluation” (PRO) and “peer evaluation” by medical professionals, was developed as a successor version of the Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS) in 2013 and has been utilized worldwide. The Japanese version of the IPOS (IPOS-J) was developed and released in 2019. The purpose of this study was to explore the applicability of the IPOS-J to clinical practice in the future. (2) Methods: We conducted the following two studies with terminally ill cancer patients: (i) Can an evaluation with the IPOS-J performed by medical professionals (peer evaluation) replace the STAS-J evaluation? (ii) Can the quality of palliative care improve by combining the IPOS-J patient evaluation with the peer evaluation? (3) Results: The overall intervention rate and urgent intervention rate for the STAS-J and IPOS-J was 34.4 vs. 34.1% (p = 0.91) and 10.4 vs. 9.9% (p = 0.78), respectively. The patients selected “intervention required” but the medical professionals selected “no intervention required” in 47 cases. The medical team performed appropriate intervention after re-assessment. As a result, more than 70% of the patients were “intervention-free” after 1 week of intervention. (4) Conclusions: The IPOS-J peer evaluation was as useful as the STAS-J evaluation. A hybrid type of evaluation, combining patient evaluation (PRO) and peer evaluation, may help us to understand patient needs and improve the quality of palliative care.

Machine learning models to detect social distress, spiritual pain, and severe physical psychological symptoms in terminally ill patients with cancer from unstructured text data in electronic medical records

Background: Few studies have developed automatic systems for identifying social distress, spiritual pain, and severe physical and phycological symptoms from text data in electronic medical records. Aim: To develop models to detect social distress, spiritual pain, and severe physical and psychological symptoms in terminally ill patients with cancer from unstructured text data contained in electronic medical records. Design: A retrospective study of 1,554,736 narrative clinical records was analyzed 1 month before patients died. Supervised machine learning models were trained to detect comprehensive symptoms, and the performance of the models was tested using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and precision recall curve (AUPRC). Setting/participants: A total of 808 patients was included in the study using records obtained from a university hospital in Japan between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019. As training data, we used medical records labeled for detecting social distress (n = 10,000) and spiritual pain (n = 10,000), and records that could be combined with the Support Team Assessment Schedule (based on date) for detecting severe physical/psychological symptoms (n = 5409). Results: Machine learning models for detecting social distress had AUROC and AUPRC values of 0.98 and 0.61, respectively; values for spiritual pain, were 0.90 and 0.58, respectively. The machine learning models accurately identified severe symptoms (pain, dyspnea, nausea, insomnia, and anxiety) with a high level of discrimination (AUROC > 0.8). Conclusion: The machine learning models could detect social distress, spiritual pain, and severe symptoms in terminally ill patients with cancer from text data contained in electronic medical records.

Association of the RASS Score with Intensity of Symptoms, Discomfort, and Communication Capacity in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients Receiving Palliative Sedation: Is RASS an Appropriate Outcome Measure?

Background:Palliative sedation is sometimes needed for refractory symptoms, and the Richmond Agitation–Sedation Scale (RASS) is one of the key measures. The primary aim of this study was to explore the association between RASS and degree of distress quantified by other measures: Item “symptom control” of Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS, item 2), Discomfort Scale for Dementia of Alzheimer Type (Discomfort Scale), and Noncommunicative Patient's Pain Assessment Instrument (NOPPAIN), as well as a communication capacity measured by the Communication Capacity Scale (CCS), item 4.Methods:This was a prospective observational study on terminally ill cancer patients with palliative sedation in a palliative care unit of a designated cancer hospital. Primarily responsible palliative care physicians rated RASS, Discomfort Scale, NOPPAIN, and CCS just before sedation and 1, 4, 24, and 48 hours after, and ward nurses rated STAS at the same time. Since the ward nurses evaluated STAS during palliative sedation, we regarded STAS as a standard of distress measure.Results:A total of 249 assessments were performed for 55 patients. RASS was moderately to highly associated with symptom intensity measured by STAS, discomfort measured by the Discomfort Scale, and pain measured by NOPPAIN (r = 0.63 to 0.73). But communication capacity measured by CCS is not parallel with RASS and demonstrated a valley shape. In 82 assessments with an RASS score of −1 to −3, 11 patients (13%) had physical symptoms of STAS of 2 or more.Conclusions:RASS can roughly estimate physical distress in patients with palliative sedation, but a measure to more precisely quantify the symptom experience is needed.

Effects of Antibiotics on Respiratory Symptoms in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients With Pneumonia: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Patients in the terminal stages of cancer are frequently affected by infection, especially pneumonia; but the effects of antibiotics on respiratory symptoms and factors associated with improvement are still unclear. This study aimed to clarify the effects of antibiotics on respiratory symptoms of terminally ill cancer patients with pneumonia, and to explore factors associated with the improvement. This was a prospective cohort study in which we consecutively recruited terminally ill cancer patients diagnosed with pneumonia and treated with antibiotics at one of 23 palliative care units across Japan. At the baseline and Day 3, primarily responsible palliative care specialists recorded patient backgrounds, the results of physical and laboratory examination, and patient symptoms using the Support Team Assessment Schedule. Improvement was defined as improvement of dyspnea, cough, and sputum production on Day 3. Among all 1896 patients admitted during the study periods, 137 patients (7.2%) were enrolled into this study. Improvement was achieved in 65 patients (47.4%; 95% confidence intervals, 39-56). Univariate analyses revealed that the Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI), respiratory rate (RR), and oxygen requirement were significantly associated with the improvement. A multiple logistic regression analysis identified that PPI score of ≤ 6 and RR of <20 were independently associated with the improvement (odds ratios, 4.4 [1.6-12] and 2.5 [1.1-5.5], respectively). Antibiotics may relieve respiratory symptoms from pneumonia in approximately half of the terminally ill cancer patients. PPI and respiratory rate are useful to identify the patients who received benefits of antibiotics.

Difficulties in Addressing Artificial Hydration and Nutrition Therapy for Terminal Cancer Patients: What to do if Patients/Families' Wishes Differ From the Medically Appropriate Treatment Plans?

Artificial hydration and nutrition therapy (AHNT) initiated by patients/families sometimes differs from medically appropriate treatment plans. We aimed to identify the causes of these differences and examine the ensuing responses and outcomes. Of 133 adult cancer patients receiving end-of-life care in the last 2years, these discrepancies occurred in 41 patients. We retrospectively examined the following issues: (1) The reason why these discrepancies occurred. (2) Based on the causes identified in (1), the following actions were taken: 1) If the consent to change to medically appropriate AHNT was obtained, physical findings using Japan Palliative Oncology Study (JPOS) group and Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) were compared before and 1 week after the intervention. 2) If consent was not obtained, time-limited trial (TLT) was conducted, and these results were compared. (3) The communication between patients/families and medical professionals was compared using Support Team Assessment Schedule. (1) Causes: a) the lack of understanding of the disease condition in 26 cases and b) faulty expectation of AHNT in 15 cases. (2) In 30 cases of 1) (20 of a) and 10 of b)) and 11 of 2) in which TLT was performed, JPOS and ESAS improved significantly. (3) The communication above was improved significantly in 1) and 2) (P = .0027 and .0039, respectively). Providing medically appropriate AHNT with the consent of patients/families is expected to not only alleviate distressing symptoms but also improve the communication between patients/families and medical professionals, as well as improve the quality of palliative care.

Experience of symptom control, anxiety and associating factors in a palliative care unit evaluated with Support Team Assessment Schedule Japanese version

Various physical and psychosocial difficulties including anxiety affect cancer patients. Patient surroundings also have psychological effects on caregiving. Assessing the current status of palliative care intervention, specifically examining anxiety and its associated factors, is important to improve palliative care unit (PCU) patient quality of life (QOL). This study retrospectively assessed 199 patients admitted to a PCU during August 2018–June 2019. Data for symptom control, anxiety level, disease insight, and communication level obtained using Support Team Assessment Schedule Japanese version (STAS-J) were evaluated on admission and after 2 weeks. Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI) and laboratory data were collected at admission. Patient anxiety was significantly severer and more frequent in groups with severer functional impairment (p = 0.003) and those requiring symptom control (p = 0.006). Nevertheless, no relation was found between dyspnea and anxiety (p = 0.135). Patients with edema more frequently experienced anxiety (p = 0.068). Patient survival was significantly shorter when family anxiety was higher after 2 weeks (p = 0.021). Symptoms, edema, and disabilities in daily living correlate with patient anxiety. Dyspnea is associated with anxiety, but its emergence might be attributable mainly to physical factors in this population. Family members might sensitize changes reflecting worsened general conditions earlier than the patients.

Factors influencing spiritual well-being in terminally ill cancer inpatients in Japan.

Spiritual well-being is very important in patients undergoing palliative care. Although psychosocial factors have been suggested to be associated with spiritual well-being, the relationship between physical signs and spiritual well-being has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to explore diverse factors associated with spiritual well-being among palliative care patients in Japan. This study is a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study involving patients admitted to palliative care units in Japan. Physicians recorded all data prospectively on a structured sheet designed for the study. The spiritual well-being score was measured using the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale after patients' death in regard to symptoms over the previous 3 days. We classified each patient into "better" score (0-1) and "worse" score (2-4) groups and examined diverse factors associated with spiritual well-being. Among the 1896 patients enrolled, 1313 were evaluated. In the multivariate analysis, seven variables were significantly associated with "worse" score: worse spiritual well-being on admission (2-4) (p < 0.0001), younger age (< 80) (p = 0.0001), hyperactive delirium over 3 days before death (mild/moderate/severe) (p = 0.0001), expressed wish for hastened death (yes) (p = 0.0006), worse communication among patients and families (Support Team Assessment Schedule score 2-4) (p = 0.0008), pleural effusion (present) (p = 0.037), and marital status (unmarried) (p = 0.0408). Recognizing factors associated with spiritual well-being is potentially useful for identifying high-risk groups with lower spiritual well-being at the end of life. Further study is required to investigate factors associated with patient-reported spiritual well-being.

Comparison of Patient Self-Reported Quality of Life and Health Care Professional-Assessed Symptoms in Terminally ill Patients With Cancer.

Few studies evaluated whether health care professionals accurately assess several symptoms for patients with cancer in palliative care units. We determined the agreement level for several symptoms related to quality of life (QOL) between patient-reported QOL assessment and health care professional-assessed symptoms based on the Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS). An observational study was performed with terminally ill patients with cancer hospitalized in the palliative care unit between June 2018 and December 2019. Patients and health care professionals independently assessed 7 symptoms at the time of hospitalization and after 1 week. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL). In examining the proportions of exact agreement, "exact agreement" referred to the pairs of the scores (QLQ-C15-PAL vs STAS) being (1 vs 0), (2 vs 1), (3 vs 2 or 3), or (4 vs 4). The relationships of physical functioning between QLQ-C15-PAL and Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) were examined. Of 130 patients, approximately 60% had PPS scores from 40 to 60. The highest mean score on QLQ-C15-PAL was for fatigue (63.8). The exact agreement on symptoms between patients and health care professionals ranged from 15.4% (fatigue) to 57.7% (nausea and vomiting). The mean of the transformed QLQ-C15-PAL and proportions of exact agreement were negatively correlated (R 2 = 0.949, P < .05). The physical function scores in QLQ-C15-PAL for each PPS group showed no differences. We expect patient-reported outcomes including QLQ-C15-PAL to be added to health care professionals' assessment of serious symptoms such as fatigue in terminally ill patients with cancer.

How successful are we in relieving terminal dyspnea in cancer patients? A real-world multicenter prospective observational study.

Parenteral morphine is widely used for dyspnea of imminently dying cancer patients, but the outcomes to expect over time remain largely unknown. We examined outcomes after the administration of parenteral morphine infusion over 48h in cancer patients with a poor performance status. This was a multicenter prospective observational study. Inclusion criteria were metastatic/locally advanced cancer, ECOG performance status = 3-4, a dyspnea intensity ≥ 2 on a Support Team Assessment Schedule, Japanese version (STAS-J), and receiving specialized palliative care. After initiating parenteral morphine infusion, we measured dyspnea STAS-J as well as Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS), item 9, and Communication Capacity Scale (CCS), item 4, every 6h over 48h. We enrolled 167 patients (median survival = 4days). The mean age was 70years, 80 patients (48%) had lung cancer, and 109 (65%) had lung metastases. The mean STAS-J scores decreased from 3.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.0-3.2) at the baseline to 2.1 (95%CI = 1.9-2.2) at 6h, and remained 1.6-1.8 over 12-48h. The proportion of patients with dyspnea relief (STAS-J ≤ 1) increased to 39% at 6h, and ranged between 49 and 61% over 12-48h. In contrast, up to 6.6 and 20% of patients showed hyperactive delirium (MDAS item 9 ≥ 2) and an inability to communicate (CCS item 4 = 3), respectively, over 48h. Overall, terminal dyspnea was relatively well controlled with parenteral morphine, though a significant number of patients continued to suffer from dyspnea. Future efforts are needed to improve outcomes following standardized dyspnea treatment using patient-reported outcomes for imminently dying patients.

Development of a family caregiver needs-assessment scale for end-of-life care for senility at home (FADE).

AimThis study aimed to develop a “family caregiver needs-assessment scale for end-of-life care for senility at home” (FADE) and examine its reliability and validity.MethodA draft item pool was developed based on a literature review, and simplified to 30 items in four domains. Next, the item pool was reviewed by four visiting nurses and four researchers and refined to 15 items. A cross-sectional study was then conducted using a self-reported questionnaire. Questionnaires were sent to 2703 visiting nurses. The survey questions included participants’ basic demographic information, the importance of each item according to a modified scale, basic demographics for cases of death by senility at home, satisfaction with each item of the modified scale in an example case, and assessment of the case using the Japanese version of the Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS-J). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Construct validity was confirmed using confirmatory factor analysis, and correlation between the new scale and the STAS-J was used to assess criterion-related validity.ResultsIn total, 461 visiting nurses provided valid responses. The exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses identified 12 items from two factors: “Needs for adaptation to senility bereavement” and “Needs for essential skills in supporting a dignified death by senility.” The final model showed appropriate index values: standardized root mean residual = 0.057, Tucker–Lewis index = 0.920, Akaike information criterion = 191.6, and Bayesian information criterion = 298.2. Cronbach’s alpha for the entire scale was 0.908, and was above 0.840 for each factor. The correlation coefficient between STAS-J and the entire scale was 0.259–0.427 (p<0.001).ConclusionsThe FADE scale showed acceptable internal consistency and concurrent validity. The scale can help clarify issues and desires that present themselves at home related to adaptation to senility bereavement and essential skills in supporting a dignified death by senility. Addressing these issues and desires is expected to reduce caregivers’ anxiety and burden, and means the older adults under their care may be respected and enabled to live with dignity and peace.

Validation of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) – Japanese Version

To improve palliative care practice, the need for patients-reported outcome measures is increasing globally. The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) is a streamlined outcome scale developed to comprehensively evaluate patients' distress. The goal of this study is to assess the reliability and validity of IPOS-Japanese version in cancer patients. This is a multicenter, cross-sectional observational study. We assessed the missing values, prevalence, test-retest reliability, criterion validity and known-group validity in Japanese adult cancer patients. Patients provided responses to IPOS, European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy- Spiritual 12 (FACIT-Sp12). Our medical staff provided responses to Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS). One hundred forty-two patients were enrolled at six palliative care facilities. Missing values accounted for less than 1% of most items, with a maximum of 2.8%. The prevalence of symptoms was 17.7-88.7%. The intra-class correlation coefficient ranged from 0.522 to 0.951. The range of correlation coefficients with EORTC-QLQ-C30, FACIT-Sp12 and STAS as gold standards was 0.013 to 0.864 (absolute values). Total IPOS scores were positively correlated with Eastern Corporative Oncology Group Performance Status (P < 0.001). IPOS-Japanese version is a valid and reliable tool. The scale is useful in assessing physical, psychological, social and spiritual symptoms and in measuring outcomes of adult cancer patients in Japan.

Validation of the IPOS-Renal Symptom Survey in Advanced Kidney Disease: A Cross-sectional Study

ContextThe significant symptom burden in advanced renal disease is often poorly recognized by clinicians. Recently, the Integrated Palliative Outcome Score (IPOS)–renal survey was developed from pre-existing tools to capture these symptoms and other common concerns. ObjectivesWe studied the validity and reliability of the IPOS-renal survey (patient and staff versions) in an Australian population. MethodsAdult patients with advanced renal disease and nurses caring for them were participated. We initially administered the IPOS-renal survey simultaneously with other validated surveys and then retested the IPOS-renal after seven to 14 days. We tested the construct validity of 1) IPOS-renal patient version in relation to the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Survey–revised and the Kidney Diseases quality of life–short form version 1.3 questionnaire and 2) IPOS-renal staff version in relation to the Support Team Assessment Schedule survey. ResultsEighty-one patients (65 hemodialysis, 10 peritoneal dialysis, and six on supportive care; average age 64.9 years) and 53 nurses (average renal nursing experience 10.9 years) were participated. Intraclass coefficients for test-retest reliability were >0.7 for most queries; Cronbach's alphas for internal consistency were 0.84 (patient version) and 0.91 (staff version). In tests of construct validity, Spearman's coefficient of correlation between surveys and their comparators for similar questions was significant, at 0.61 to 0.77 (patients) and 0.24 to 0.76 (staff). As expected, symptom scores and total symptom burden were negatively correlated with summary scores of quality of life. ConclusionThe IPOS-renal surveys, patient and staff versions, have good test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity in patients with advanced kidney disease and their nurses. We recommend their use in symptom assessment.

Development of the Japanese version of an information aid to provide accurate information on prognosis to patients with advanced non\u2013small-cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy: a pilot study

BackgroundWithout explicit prognostic information, patients may overestimate their life expectancy and make poor choices at the end of life. We sought to design the Japanese version of an information aid (IA) to provide accurate information on prognosis to patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to assess the effects of the IA on hope, psychosocial status, and perception of curability.MethodsWe developed the Japanese version of an IA, which provided information on survival and cure rates as well as numerical survival estimates for patients with metastatic NSCLC receiving first-line chemotherapy. We then assessed the pre- and post-intervention effects of the IA on hope, anxiety, and perception of curability and treatment benefits.ResultsA total of 20 (95%) of 21 patients (65% male; median age, 72 years) completed the IA pilot test. Based on the results, scores on the Distress and Impact Thermometer screening tool for adjustment disorders and major depression tended to decrease (from 4.5 to 2.5; P = 0.204), whereas no significant changes were seen in scores for anxiety on the Japanese version of the Support Team Assessment Schedule or in scores on the Hearth Hope Index (from 41.9 to 41.5; p = 0.204). The majority of the patients (16/20, 80%) had high expectations regarding the curative effects of chemotherapy.ConclusionThe Japanese version of the IA appeared to help patients with NSCLC maintain hope, and did not increase their anxiety when they were given explicit prognostic information; however, the IA did not appear to help such patients understand the goal of chemotherapy. Further research is needed to test the findings in a larger sample and measure the outcomes of explicit prognostic information on hope, psychological status, and perception of curability.

Effect of administered corticosteroids for alleviating dyspnea in patients with terminal cancer: a prospective observational approach

Our primary objective was to prospectively evaluate the effects of corticosteroids on dyspnea in terminal cancer patients at Kasugai Municipal Hospital using the Japanese version of the Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS-J). Our secondary objective was to report the side effects of corticosteroid use in these patients. The prospective investigation included two female patients with terminal breast cancer (Patients 1 and 2, ages 53 and 57 years, respectively) who satisfied the consecutive selection criteria and were hospitalized at Kasugai Municipal Hospital between January 2016 and March 2017. We used both interviews and a review of clinical records to evaluate these patients’ responses to oral or intravenous corticosteroid therapy for dyspnea. Patient 1 had an initial STAS-J dyspnea scale score of 4 before the commencement of corticosteroid administration, which decreased to scores of 2 (day 1) and 1 (day 2 and day 3) after corticosteroid administration. Patient 2 had an initial STAS-J scale score of 3, which decreased to 1 on day 1 and was maintained at this level until death occurred on day 15. Both patients experienced rapid relief of dyspnea (within 24 hours), indicating that corticosteroids may be used to effectively treat early dyspnea experienced by terminal cancer patients.

The Effect of Loop Diuretics on Sarcopenia and Long-Term Prognosis in Patients with Refractory Hepatic Ascites Treated with Tolvaptan

We investigated sarcopenia, focusing on the dose of loop diuretics used in 70 patients with refractory hepatic ascites treated with tolvaptan. Bloating improved in 68.5% of patients, as determined using the Japanese version of the Support Team Assessment Schedule. The psoas muscle index (PMI) was used to define sarcopenia. A statistically significant difference was observed in the PMI between patients receiving low-dose (3.6 ± 1.2 cm2/m2) and high-dose furosemide (3.1 ± 1.2 cm2/m2) before tolvaptan treatment (P = 0.048). The PMI increased from 3.2 ± 1.1 cm2/m2 to 3.5 ± 1.3 cm2/m2 (P = 0.002) in responders, but decreased from 3.4 ± 1.2 cm2/m2 to 3.0 ± 1.0 cm2/m2 (P = 0.106) in non-responders before and after tolvaptan treatment, respectively. The long-term prognosis improved in responders compared with non-responders (mean survival time: 646 days vs. 228 days, P < 0.001). Early introduction of tolvaptan treatment is necessary to prevent the progression of sarcopenia.

The Evaluation of Tolvaptan Therapy and Long-Term Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Refractory Ascites

We investigated Tolvaptan efficacy and long-term prognosis with focus on nutrition in 20 patients with refractory hepatic ascites in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Bloating improved in 55% of patients, as determined using a Japanese version of the Support Team Assessment Schedule. Nutritional status improved with Tolvaptan treatment, based on the Controlling Nutritional Status score and Onodera’s prognostic nutritional index. Long-term prognosis was better in responders than in non-responders (mean survival time: 308 days vs. 97 days, p = 0.031). Tolvaptan was even effective in many patients with HCC, with additional improvement in long-term prognosis expected with improvement in the nutritional status.