Support Graduate Students Research Articles

Multi-dimensional Path Exploration of Artificial Intelligence Empowering Postgraduate Research Ability Improvement

The application of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the field of graduate research is becoming more and more common, which has brought unprecedented opportunities and challenges for the enhancement of graduate research ability. The purpose of this study is to deeply analyze the multiple mechanisms of artificial intelligence promoting the improvement of graduate students' scientific research ability. Firstly, this paper systematically analyzed the theoretical foundation of artificial intelligence in graduate research, covering the application of core algorithms such as machine learning and deep learning in scientific research practice, as well as the mechanism of the integration of artificial intelligence and scientific research, including the potential of interdisciplinary cooperation, the challenges encountered in the integration process and their coping strategies. Then the application examples of artificial intelligence in graduate research practice are expounded, including but not limited to the key links of literature search and analysis, experiment design and data analysis. Then, from the two dimensions of cultivating innovative thinking and improving learning autonomy, how artificial intelligence can help improve graduate students' scientific research ability is discussed. It is believed that artificial intelligence plays an important role in generating new hypotheses, stimulating creativity, breaking through traditional thinking patterns, generating personalized learning resources, and assisting group discussion. In summary, artificial intelligence plays a vital role in improving the scientific research ability of graduate students, and provides strong technical support and innovation motivation for graduate students' scientific research work.

Time to act: Mental health and desired university supports among graduate students

ABSTRACT Research on university student well-being often fails to differentiate between graduate and undergraduate students or overlooks graduate students entirely. The different characteristics of graduate (vs. undergraduate) students may contribute to unique mental health needs in this population; hence research is needed to specifically address their psychological functioning. Thus, the goals of the present study were to report on: (1) the mental health profile of a large sample of Canadian graduate students; and (2) graduate students’ recommendations for what their university could do to improve their well-being. We used an online survey administered from September 2021 to October 2022. Participants included 648 graduate students from a university in Southwestern Ontario, Canada (response rate = 20.6%; M age = 27.9; 73.1% women; 65.1% White). We examined mental health variables and perceived university supportiveness; and conducted an inductive content analysis of recommendations to improve university-provided support. Graduate students reported alarming rates of ill-being across various domains. Advisor support was associated with better graduate student mental health across multiple indicators. Most frequently, graduate students requested increased financial support to improve well-being. Taken together, these results punctuate the need for action to support graduate students and provide suggestions for meaningful change.

The Dissertation ECoach: Supporting graduate students as they transition to dissertation writing

Transitioning from coursework to dissertation writing presents unique challenges for graduate students. To support students in this phase of their careers, we created the Dissertation ECoach, a digital tool that provides automated and personalized support and guidance to address individual challenges and promote effective writing habits. By engaging with the Dissertation ECoach, students receive weekly surveys and tailored messages that encourage their writing process. This article discusses the development history, functionality, and methods of the Dissertation ECoach, as well as the results of its implementation at the University of Michigan for the period 2020–2023. Data show that a high percentage of students find the Dissertation ECoach experience helpful, to the point that a subset of students decide to enroll in the experience repeatedly. The article concludes by highlighting the potential of the Dissertation ECoach to be adopted by other universities, offering automated, customized support for graduate students across disciplines. The article also introduces updates that have been implemented in 2023/2024.

Meaningful Results with Limited Resources: Evidence from a Program to Support Graduate Students’ Scholarly Writing

Although writing is an essential skill for graduate students (in and beyond their degree programs), limited programmatic support exists to help students develop mindsets and habits needed to become effective, scholarly writers. Furthermore, attrition rates are on the rise in the U.S., with many students dropping out at the “all but dissertation” stage. The timing of departure indicates writing may be a widespread issue warranting direct intervention. We developed a campus-wide, six-week learning community and certificate program intended to increase students’ self-efficacy in academic writing, using readings, reflection, and discussion among graduate students. Pilot results from 32 participants indicate that a noncredit-bearing, short course can have positive impacts on graduate students’ emotions about writing, their literature management approaches, awareness of the social context of writing, and their understanding of writing resources and academic voice. Potential exists for this low-budget model to be applied more broadly and thereby improve efforts to retain and support graduate students.

"I do think that accessibility is a really major thing that has come [out] of [the] pandemic": The lived experiences of resilience and health-related quality of life among a diverse sample of graduate students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the mental health and wellbeing of post-secondary students. Resilience has been found to serve as a protective factor against mental distress among students during the pandemic. Despite the plethora of research that exists on post-secondary students during this crisis, most studies exploring students' health and resilience are quantitative and lack diversity. To date, the lived experiences of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and resilience among graduate students representing diversity in age, gender, ethnicity, parental status, university, degree, and faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic remain unknown. As a part of a larger study, the purpose of this qualitative paper was to understand the lived experiences of resilience and HRQOL among a diverse sample of graduate students approximately 18 months into the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada. A total of 14 students participated in semi-structured interviews exploring HRQOL domains, factors that supported/undermined participants' resilience, challenges/barriers to being resilient, and participants' inner strength. Thematic analysis revealed 5 themes: (1) cultural influences on resilience; (2) the role of privilege/power in shaping resilience; (3) how life stage and past experiences support resilience; (4) how the COVID-19 pandemic has undermined the resilience of equity-deserving groups; and (5) the role of disability/chronic pain. This work presents a unique dichotomy between how the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the lives of some graduate students, while simultaneously creating opportunities for others to thrive. Findings from this work underscore the importance of creating inclusive and accessible educational spaces to support graduate students' resilience and HRQOL currently, and in times of crisis.

“What are you looking for in a candidate?” The career search process for international students in higher education student affairs

AbstractThis study examined lived experiences of two international student affairs professionals in the United States. Through a series of interviews, the dialogues unfold rich narratives that explore the multifaceted journey from academic preparation to career placement in the field of higher education student affairs (HESA). It also underscores the unique challenges encountered by international students compared to their domestic counterparts during the job search process. Given the limited research pertaining to the experiences and support for international graduate students during the job search process in the field of HESA, this study provides valuable insights and implications for educators, institutions, and career support services to better address the needs of the diverse and growing demographic of the candidates.

Supporting graduate students’ skills with simulated experiences in a professional foundation course

The population’s health depends on a well-educated nursing workforce that includes graduate-prepared nurses. However, the nation’s demand for graduate nurses in advanced practice, teaching, and research roles surpasses the supply. Graduate nursing educators can support student success by creating positive learning experiences for students at the beginning of their study programs. Initially, we created a pilot writing orientation, which was implemented for new students. Although the results of the pilot study showed significance with paired t-tests (p < .000; Cohen’s d = 1.21), the writing skills were not applied in long-term coursework. Therefore, a seven-week course was created to provide students with small-scale assignments, preparing them for complex future graduate coursework. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the skills learned in the course using student (n = 15) and faculty (n = 9) focus groups. A qualitative design using thematic analysis showed the following student themes: tools to improve scholarly writing, magnitude and feasibility of the project, graduate-level writing and professional presentations, clear expectations of achieving program requirements, and professional development using a digital e-portfolio. Faculty focus groups compared the skills of students who had completed the course and those who had not. Faculty themes included stronger writing skills despite the variation, resource availability, tool use, APA format skills, and writing synthesis skills development. Overall, the participants’ perspectives shared positive feedback with insightful suggestions for future course improvement.

Technology accountability groups: A novel form of technology learning and support for graduate students and faculty in STEM.

In academia, particularly in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), writing accountability groups have emerged as an effective technique to enhance writing productivity by offering structure, increasing the commitment to write, and fostering social commitment. The rapid development of technology has introduced a new challenge across STEM fields: technostress, where individuals face heightened stress due to novel applications of technology. To address this, we introduce Technology Accountability Groups (TAGs), a novel form of community support for graduate students and faculty. TAGs are tailored to help individuals navigate technological innovations, alleviate technostress, acquire new skills, motivate, and connect with leaders in the field. This paper presents a framework for establishing, implementing, and sustaining TAGs in STEM.

Relations of care and affirmative disruptions in academia: A conversation with Katie Strom

This article features an intra-view with critical posthumanist Professor Kathryn (Katie) Strom and the co-editors of the intra-view section of this journal Jacky Barreiro and Magali Forte. Throughout their conversation, Strom shares her determination to co-create relations of care and affirmative disruptions in the neoliberal context of academia while giving concrete examples and explaining how her feminist praxis evolved. The three authors discuss several initiatives Strom and others have implemented, inspired by Braidotti’s (2019) notion and praxis of affirmative ethics among other feminist scholarship, to create spaces of support for graduate students and early career scholars. This piece encourages readers to view and understand feminist processes as affirmative disruptions to foster affective flows, challenge conventions, and inspire innovative scholarly pursuits.

A Self-Study Action Research Approach to English for Academic Purposes

This study examines the effectiveness of a course for international Master’s students integrating second language acquisition (SLA) content with English for Academic Purposes (EAP) development, using a two-layered action research approach. The students in the course created self-study action research plans to achieve their EAP goals, and designed instruments to assess their progress resulting from the implementation of their plans (the first layer). The instructor also used an action research lens through which to investigate this pedagogical approach and make adjustments to the course (the second layer). The research aimed to investigate the EAP developments that students achieved through their action research plans, and the aspects of the course that contributed to those improvements. Four focal student participants' electronic portfolios were analyzed using Scarcella's (2003) academic English framework. Findings suggest that the action research model benefited students by helping them develop their linguistic, cognitive and sociocultural/psychological dimensions of academic English, and encouraging learner autonomy. Furthermore, this model benefited the instructor and her future students in terms of insights gained which allowed for improvements to the course curriculum and delivery. Implications for supporting graduate students’ EAP development and cultivating their research skills through action research are discussed.

The roles of extrinsic neurons in modulating neuroimmune crosstalk during acute enteric infection with Citrobacter rodentium

Background: The intestinal tract is one of the most densely innervated organs in our body, containing extrinsic sensory and sympathetic neurons. With their cell bodies located outside of the gut, these neurons directly detect enteric pathogens and release immunomodulatory neurotransmitters or neuropeptides to communicate with immune cells in the gut. Specifically, sympathetic neurons secrete neurotransmitter norepinephrine, which activate β2 adrenergic receptors (β2ΑR) on immune cells to regulate immune functions. Recent studies from our lab, as well as others, have begun to highlight the neural regulation of immune responses during enteric infections. However, the precise pathways responsible for orchestrating these effects remain elusive. Hypothesis: We sought to determine whether extrinsic sensory and sympathetic neurons are implicated in host protective responses against enteric pathogen Citrobacter rodentium (C. rodentium). Methods: Mice were inoculated by oral gavage with C. rodentium (108 colony-forming units) or sterile luria broth. Bacterial colonization was quantified by homogenization of distal colon tissues and plating serial dilutions onto MacConkey agar. Relevant tissues were collected for qPCR, flow cytometry or histology. Genetically engineered Arc Targeted Recombination in Active Population (TRAP) mice were used to identify neurons that were activated during infection. These ArcTRAP mice received single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 4-hydroxytamoxifen post-infection to “trap” active neurons, marking them tdTomato+. 6-hydroxydopamine (6OHDA) was used to chemically ablate sympathetic innervations to the colon via 3 consecutive daily i.p. injections. Results: At day 4 post-infection, there were significantly more active tdTomato+ neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) of the infected mice compared to the non-infected controls. This increase was more pronounced as the infection peaked at day 10, indicating that more neurons were being activated in the RVLM in response to C. rodentium in the gut. 6OHDA treatment significantly increased bacterial burden in distal colon at day 10 post-infection. This was associated with decreased tyrosine hydroxylase expression compared to the vehicle controls. Subsequently, qPCR revealed that there was increased pro-inflammatory cytokines expression in the colon of sympathectomized infected mice compared to the infected controls. Similarly, β2AR knockout significantly increased bacterial burden in distal colon at day 3 and 10 post-infection. Increased pro-inflammatory cytokines expression suggests an immunomodulatory role for β2AR during C. rodentium infection. Conclusions: These studies provided novel insights into the neuroimmune crosstalk that is crucial for acute enteric infections with C. rodentium. Specifically, these experiments may reveal how extrinsic neurons shape local immune responses in the gut. NIH NIAID R01AI150647; Graduate Student Support Program (UC Davis: School of Veterinary Medicine). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

“They Don’t Really Care”: STEM Doctoral Students’ Unsupportive Interactions with Faculty and Institutions

Increasing the representation of racially minoritized groups and women in STEM graduate education is insufficient to make STEM fields and academia inclusive and equitable spaces, where all feel supported and thrive. This study was motivated by a phenomenological examination of support for graduate students, focusing on programs that admitted and graduated higher proportions of underrepresented students than their fields. We used negative case analysis to document the interplay of interpersonal and institutional interactions that define what racially/gender minoritized students experience as unsupportive. Guided by an intersectional interpretation of structuration, we uncovered three mechanisms—withholding support, doing racialized and/or gendered harm, and neglecting to take action when students faced known threats/harm—that underlie the unsupportive experiences faced by graduate students of color and women in STEM doctoral education. This typology of unsupportive mechanisms, alongside an understanding of positive types of support, can help practitioners and scholars rethink what constitutes support, moving toward creating equitable and inclusive graduate education.

Mixed reviews on diversity initiatives: toward an institutional change model for Black faculty in engineering and computing

IntroductionUniversities across the United States have implemented initiatives to enhance diversity in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, focusing on improving outcomes for racially minoritized students. While many diversity initiatives target undergraduate programs, there is a gap in support for STEM graduate students. Recognizing the persistent underrepresentation of racially diverse populations in STEM, the Biden-Harris Administration launched the “Raise the Bar: STEM Excellence for All Students” initiative, aiming to bolster STEM education nationwide. Foundations like the Sloan Foundation have developed pathways programs for STEM students, extending support into graduate school and the professoriate. The success of diversity initiatives often hinges on the participation and endorsement of underrepresented STEM faculty.MethodsThis study investigates the perspectives of twenty-nine Black engineering and computing faculty regarding diversity initiatives within their respective departments. Grounded theory methodology guided the qualitative analysis, enabling a deeper understanding of the racialized diversity management framework. Drawing on institutional racism perspectives, the study aimed to develop a theoretical framework elucidating institutional engagement with and implementation of diversity initiatives in engineering education.ResultsThe participants’ perspectives on diversity initiatives reflected features of organizational change. Three types of organizational environments emerged: 1) stagnant, characterized by aspirational commitments to diversity; 2) moderate, where underrepresented populations are recruited but expected to assimilate into the dominant culture; and 3) transformational, representing organizations taking significant steps towards creating equitable environments. The narratives of the study participants shed light on the varying effectiveness of efforts to increase the representation of successful Black students and faculty in engineering academia.DiscussionThe findings underscore the importance of understanding organizational contexts and dynamics in shaping the outcomes of diversity initiatives. By delineating the racialized diversity management framework, this study provides insights into the complexities of institutional engagement with diversity in engineering education. Addressing the challenges identified, particularly in environments characterized as stagnant or moderate, is crucial for advancing equity and inclusion in STEM fields. Effective diversity initiatives must go beyond recruitment efforts to create transformative, equitable environments conducive to the success of racially minoritized students and faculty in engineering academia.

Making Small Talk: Support for Chinese Graduate Students

This article is based on a larger phenomenological inquiry which examined the challenges faced by Chinese graduate students in Canada when making small talk in English as an additional language. In that study, ten participants were interviewed about their small talk experiences, including the support they expected and received from peers, faculty members, and institutions. This article examines the level of support provided to assist these students engage in small talk with a specific focus on the gap between the help they need and the help they get. The study is theoretically informed by the concept of community of practice which describes how newcomers learn in naturally occurring established communities. It was found that all participants expected and wanted institutional and peer support, but their level of satisfaction with what they received varied. All four universities attended by the research participants offered services designed to help international students, but uptake was a problem. It is recommended that institutions put more effort into developing, promoting, and monitoring programs designed to support international students. Keywords: small talk, community of practice, Chinese graduate students, support

Catalyzing Organizational Change for Equity in Graduate Education: A Case Study of Adopting Collective Impact in a College of Engineering

Graduate education in engineering is an extremely challenging, complex entity that is difficult to change. The purpose of this exploratory research paper was to investigate the applicability of the Collective Impact framework, which has been used within community organizing contexts, to organize the change efforts of a center focused on advancing equitable graduate education within engineering. We sought to understand how the conditions of Collective Impact (i.e., common agenda, backbone organization, mutually reinforcing activities, shared measurement system, and continuous communication) could facilitate the organization of equity-focused change efforts across a college of engineering at a single institution. To achieve this, we took an action research approach. We found the Collective Impact framework to be a useful tool for organizing cross-sectional partnerships to facilitate equity-focused change in graduate education; we also found the five conditions of Collective Impact to be applicable to the higher education context, with some intentional considerations and modifications. Through coordinated efforts, the Collective Impact framework can support the goal of reorienting existing decentralized structures, resource flows, and decision processes to foster bottom-up and top-down change processes to advance equitable support for graduate students.

Addressing challenges and finding solutions: navigating the informal curriculum of publication training within higher education

ABSTRACT The peer-review process used in most academic journals is critical for curating evidence-based knowledge. Although many graduate programmes expect students to engage in the research process, these programmes often do not mandate formal training for the publication process. With few studies examining the graduate student experience in the publication process, the current study sought to help address this gap. Specifically, we used a reflexive thematic analysis approach to look at 18, hour-long, semi-structured interviews with Education graduate students at the master’s and doctoral level. Using a revised version of Kolb’s experiential learning theory to contextualise the results, we highlight three main areas related to participants’ experiences engaging in the publication process: a) experiences and motivations, b) challenges, and c) pathways to publishing. Based on these findings, we offer implications for higher education to support graduate students’ readiness to engage in the publication process as future scholars.

Let’s Talk About Writing Support for Plurilingual Graduate Students

Academic writing is an inseparable aspect of graduate school (Holmes et al., 2018) as students’ academic writing is the primary basis for assessment (Turner, 2011). The high-stakes nature of academic writing is magnified for plurilingual students, whose attendance at English medium universities is growing exponentially (Fenton-Smith & Humphreys, 2017). However, there is a scarcity of research that addresses how faculty support writing as an essential practice for plurilingual graduate students, particularly in English-medium universities where English is implicated in structures of power and privilege. Employing a critical analytic collaborative autoethnography (Anderson, 2006; Kempny, 2022) this research uses polyvocal conversations among seven researcher/practitioners to consider the question of how faculty members perceive and respond to the academic writing needs of plurilingual graduate students. Informed by intersectionality (Crenshaw, 2017; Hankivsky, 2014), these conversations illuminate the ways both educator identities and epistemological turns in education theory impact approaches to writing support for plurilingual graduate writers. Importantly, these discussions are implicated in the socio-political contexts of Canadian and Australian universities where systems of inequality act to marginalise plurilingual writers. These contextualised conversations then aim to problematise and revise existent, dominant deficit discourses and pedagogies of writing support for plurilingual students. Findings illuminate the capacity of educators, who are cognisant of their power and place, to generate alternative practices to support plurilingual graduate writers in service of more asset-orientated and inclusive spaces that take advantage of students’ plurilingual repertoires in English-dominant universities.

Graduate education and government policy in times of crisis: a case study of the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to understand US federal government policy during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic and the connections to graduate education. Using the multiple streams framework, the paper outlines these actions through various streams (problems, policy and political) and perspectives (defining problems, articulating options and mobilizing responses).Design/methodology/approachThe primary sources of data collected for this study were US federal government policies from March 2020 through May 2021. Policies were examined through introduction, implementation and alteration (when possible) within the specific time period of the study. The policies outlined in this paper were connected to the US Department of Education, and to a lesser extent, the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation and other federal agencies. Data analysis was a two-fold process. First, the individual policy was considered as a single case and second, a cross-case comparison occurred across the multiple cases.FindingsAnalysing the study’s data in the problem stream provides a strong indicator of how the pandemic was perceived as a challenge for US graduate education. The pandemic served as a focusing event and illuminated the connections of graduate education to key institutional functions, including research and teaching. Broadly, US federal policy actions in this area focused on giving institutions resources and flexibility to support graduate students and allow them to continue their academic work while also seeding funding and incentives to continue the movement of knowledge, activities and people in the research pipeline. Actions in the policy stream aligned with the decentralized nature of the US higher education system and allowed for choice by academic institutions within the parameters of options.Originality/valueThis paper extends extant literature related to policy-making and graduate education to consider policy-making during a time of crisis. The paper offers methodological and conceptual ideas for consideration in future research.

Graduate student experiences of engineering education research in Canada

ABSTRACT In Canada, formal structures for advancing engineering education research (EER), including graduate programmes, funding, and career pathways, are uncommon. However, an active informal EER community exists. Using the Identity Trajectory Framework, we designed an exploratory basic interpretive qualitative study to learn how 21 graduate students experienced EER in Canada. EER’s dualist internal identity and lack of external identity, credibility, and structural support create a feedback loop of uncertainties for graduate students trying to navigate EER. This inhibits the healthy development of EER as an academic discipline, and thereby, the healthy development of EER graduate students. If we want to successfully support graduate students in developing their identity as EER researchers, we need institutional structures. Understanding how graduate students experience EER in Canada is important to understand how to build capacity here and in other locales where the field is newly developing.

Historically Underrepresented Graduate Students’ Experiences at a U.S. Majority Serving Institution: A Narrative Analysis

Aim/Purpose: This study explored the experiences of a group of historically underrepresented graduate students at a research-intensive university to understand their perceived supports and barriers to academic persistence and success and how these related to their background, socioeconomic status, language, and cultural differences. Background: Attending graduate school can provide learning in specialized disciplines, creating opportunities for career advancement and gains in income. Under-represented students (i.e., underrepresented minorities, females in STEM, first-generation students, part-time, and international students) often encounter additional barriers in graduate school, such as a lower sense of belonging, imposter phenomenon, or microaggressions. However, they may find emotional support through family and friends and mentor support through faculty and advisors. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs was used to understand how these graduate student success factors acted as supports and barriers to motivate students to reach their optimal potential. Methodology: In this qualitative narrative study, interview transcripts from fourteen graduate students studying at an R1 university in the United States were restoried into narratives. For the typographic analyses, themes emerged from the individuals’ stories. Similarities in the data were organized into categories, and relationships were sought between the categories. For the rhetorical analyses, short storylines developed from these cases were used to derive opposition statements and syllogisms. Contribution: This study illuminates the graduate student experience through novel analytical methods and a well-regarded psychological theory – Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs – tied to graduate student success factors. Although each person’s graduate experience is unique, the study findings lead to recommendations to enhance the graduate student experience for all students. Findings: Case analyses revealed nine major themes linked to students’ backgrounds, socioeconomic status, language, and cultural differences: (1) mentor support, (2) sense of belonging, (3) financial support, (4) peer support, (5) community, (6) imposter phenomenon, (7) microaggressions, (8) family obligations, and (9) access and opportunity for academic research and writing. Recommendations for Practitioners: Universities can better support graduate students by providing better professional development for faculty to serve as mentors, using a cohort-based model for better peer support, financial counseling for graduate students, better mental health services and access, more parental support considerations, and more opportunities for research experiences. Recommendation for Researchers: Researchers will gain a more nuanced understanding of individuals’ circumstances – particularly those students who have many complicating life circumstances (e.g., enrollment status, family, finances, citizenship) – by collecting and analyzing qualitative data. Mixed methods, using validated instruments, could also enhance our understanding of graduate education. Impact on Society: Universities that follow the recommendations in this study will enhance the experiences of graduate students, likely increase graduation rates, and contribute to a more educated and more diverse workforce. Future Research: For universities that have already implemented some of the suggested support structures (e.g., mentor professional development, cohort programs, and financial counseling), future research could investigate their utility to graduate students.