Sponsored by Latin American studies programs of Yale and University of Connecticut, conference on Women and Labor in Latin America ex amined gender dynamics of production and reproduction. The presenta tions, given April 17-18, 1987, touched on a broad spectrum of topics, includ ing women and factory labor, sexual politics of rural social conflict, tensions of life among nineteenth-century domestic servants, and women's role in contemporary trade unionism. Dealing with employer visions of industrial employee, Barba ra Weinstein explored contradictions inherent in annual industrialist sponsored Operario Padr?o (Ideal Worker) campaigns conducted in S?o Paulo, Brazil between 1964 and 1986. Conducted by Social Service of In dustry (SESI), this factory, state, and national-level competition was designed to celebrate individual-worker achievement and foster a mobility myth within factory, and was referred to as Operario Ladr?o (Worker Thief) or Operario Patr?o (Worker Boss) contest by union activists. Only three of 55 winners examined by Weinstein were women, despite an industrial work force that was one-quarter female. Susan Besse of City University of New York emphasized that male underlying SESI contest clearly implied a larger employer vision of women's proper role. Discussing stereotyped vision of women's place ad vanced by Labor Ministry in 1930s (efficiency, economy, and Taylor ism in kitchen), she suggested ways to explore differential normative standards of gender that characterized SESI and male factory workers who voted in these contests. Steven Stein (University of Miami) welcomed Wein stein's use of interviews and work histories to examine human-level contra dictions of these ideal workers, who tended on whole to be male super visory personnel. In Women and Popular Politics in Postwar S?o Paulo, Brazil, John French (Utah State University) explored women's sociopolitical participation in industrial ABC region of Greater S?o Paulo, 1945-47. Dealing with a pe riod of political upsurge and mass strikes, he observed that the greater ex tent, depth, and intensity of working-class mobilization, greater in volvement and visibility of working-class women, including both housewives and women workers. Such abnormal times, he continued, help to reveal
Read full abstract