Abstract Background Convergent epicardial and endocardial catheter ablation had been used for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). Aims The aims of this retrospective study are to describe the pattern of arrhythmias and substrate findings in patients previously submitted to convergent ablation and showing arrhythmic recurrences (AF/AT/AFL lasting at least 30 seconds) and documented with ILR during follow up. Methods From a cohort of 119 patient who underwent convergent ablation, we selected the 55 with arrhythmic recurrences and showing AT/AF/AFL stored in ILR memories to submit them to remap procedure. Results We excluded 1 patient who was submitted to ablate and pace without remapping and 1 patient whose data has been lost. Among 53 patients, 69.7% experienced AF (33.9% PAF and 35.8% PeAF), 5.6% typical AFL and 30.2% AT/atypical AFL. As for the substrates found, at detailed high-density mapping we had: 66.9% with veins reconnection (regardless the gaps localization), 37.7% with low-voltage area/abnormal signals on the posterior wall, 11.3% deserving CTI ablation for typical AFL and 28.3% with different LA substrates (septal, anterior, LAA, mitral annulus and 9.4% with gaps at superior surgical line). Notably, overlaps of arrhythmic patterns and substrate were also found in the same patients. Conclusion In our study a total of 79.1% patients had substrates related to previous convergent ablation due to gaps at pulmonary veins or superior line. The rest had an arrhythmic substrate in areas not previously ablated like posterior wall or CTI. These findings suggest that a large amount of patients submitted to convergent ablation (up to 80%) may have an arrhythmic substrate and thus potentially recurrences due to previous epi-endocardial ablation.