Superficial Surgical Site Infection Research Articles

Risk of surgical site infection after hip hemiarthroplasty of femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a major complication following hemiarthroplasty surgery for displaced neck of femur fractures. Our aim is to systematically analyse relevant peer-reviewed studies for recent clinical information on the quantitative risk of surgical site infection (SSI) after hemiarthroplasty (HA) of hip fracture patients and on the factors which influence the SSI rates. A comprehensive search of electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane) was performed for clinical articles published between 2005 and 2023 and systematically reviewed with a defined list of inclusion and exclusion criteria. The methodology was undertaken and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement checklist, while the detailed search strings and study protocol were published in PROSPERO (CRD42023458150). The pooled risks of SSIs were calculated in both primary and subgroup analyses. The primary analysis showed a pooled superficial SSI rate after hemiarthroplasty of 1.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71; 2.04) from 17 studies with 29,288 patients and a deep SSI rate of 2.14% (1.87; 2.42) from 29 studies with 192,392 patients. Higher infection rates were observed with longer follow-up periods for deep SSI: pooled rates increased from 1.24% (0.73; 1.87) at 1 month to 2.64% (2.03; 3.31) at 12 months. Additionally, studies using defined criteria for infection diagnosis reported higher rates compared to undefined criteria: pooled deep SSI rates were 2.91% (1.40; 4.92) vs. 0.62% (0.34; 0.96) for defined vs. undefined criteria respectively, and 3.18% (2.23; 4.29) vs. 1.7% (1.44; 1.99) for superficial SSI. The results of this study demonstrate a substantial SSI risk and a high variability of the infection rates following hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture patients. A standardization of infection criteria and an extended follow-up period are advisable and should be considered in guidelines aimed at improving the standard of care for these patients.

Acute Appendicitis in Children with Hematological Malignancies: The Need for Early Diagnosis and Prompt Treatment—A Single-Center Case Series

Abstract Introduction Appendicitis in patients with hematological malignancies presents with vague symptoms, thus requiring a high degree of suspicion for early diagnosis and treatment to prevent complications. Objectives The aim of this article was to describe the demographic, clinicoradiological, operative findings, and outcomes in patients with acute appendicitis with underlying hematological malignancies. Materials and Methods A retrospective review of pediatric patients with hematological malignancy who developed acute appendicitis was conducted. Medical records of patients were reviewed for patient demographics, disease status, signs, and symptoms at the time of diagnosis of acute appendicitis, and outcome. The laboratory, radiological, and histological findings were retrieved from the hospital records. Results Six (2.4%) patients developed acute appendicitis over the past 8 years among a total of 254 patients treated for hematological malignancies in the unit. Five patients had underlying acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and one had acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Of the five patients, three were in postremission consolidation, one each in the delayed intensification and maintenance phase of chemotherapy. The child with AML was on induction chemotherapy for the first relapse at the time of diagnosis. Fever and abdominal pain were the common presenting symptoms. Diagnosis was made on ultrasound abdomen in five patients, and one patient was diagnosed on computed tomography. All patients underwent open appendectomy. Two patients had evidence of appendiceal perforation. Three patients had neutropenia at the time of developing appendicitis and underwent appendectomy regardless of the absolute neutrophil count (ANC). Five patients recovered well, and chemotherapy was restarted within 2 weeks of appendectomy. One patient developed a superficial surgical site infection. and one patient with relapsed AML expired due to refractory septic shock. Conclusion Acute appendicitis in patients with hematological malignancies can present with subtle signs and symptoms. Appendectomy can be safely performed irrespective of the ANC.

The utility of intraperitoneal drain placement after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in postoperative intraperitoneal abscess prevention.

Perforated appendicitis is associated with postoperative development of intraperitoneal abscess. Intraperitoneal drain placement during appendectomy is thought to reduce the risk of developing postoperative intraperitoneal abscess. The aim of this study was to determine whether intraperitoneal drainage could reduce the incidence of intraperitoneal abscess formation after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. This is a retrospective study of all patients (aged 7 and above) who were diagnosed with perforated appendicitis and subsequently underwent laparoscopic appendectomy between January 2018 and December 2022 at two government hospitals in the state of Kuwait. Demographic, clinical, and perioperative characteristics were compared between patients who underwent intraoperative intraperitoneal drain placement and those who did not. The primary outcome was the development of postoperative intraperitoneal abscess. Secondary outcomes included overall postoperative complications, superficial surgical site infection (SSI), length of stay (LOS), readmission and postoperative percutaneous drainage. A total of 511 patients met the inclusion criteria between 2018 and 2022. Of these, 307 (60.1%) underwent intraoperative intraperitoneal drain placement. Patients with and without drains were similar regarding age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (Table1). The overall rate of postoperative intraperitoneal abscess was 6.1%. Postoperatively, there was no difference in postoperative intraperitoneal abscess formation between patients who underwent intraperitoneal drain placement and those who did not (6.5% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.707). Patients with intraperitoneal drains had a longer LOS (4 [4, 6] vs. 3 [2, 5] days, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the overall complication (18.6% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.065), superficial SSI (2.9% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.791) or readmission rate (4.9% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.835). Following laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis, intraperitoneal drain placement appears to confer no additional benefit and may prolong hospital stay.

Not all operative time is created equal: operative time in relation to 30-day complications in benign laparoscopic hysterectomies

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between operative time and specific 30-day postoperative complications across different intervals of operation duration in total laparoscopic hysterectomies (TLHs).DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study.SETTING: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2011 to 2020.PATIENTS: 131,146 TLH cases.INTERVENTIONS: Eligible cases included benign laparoscopic hysterectomies with operative times between 20 and 499 min. We excluded cases involving disseminated cancer, emergency surgery, supracervical approaches, or concomitant procedures.MEASUREMENTS: Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between specific postoperative complications and operative time. Spline regression was used to analyze differences in the association between postoperative complications and operative time across different tertiles of operative duration.MAIN RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between operative time and complication occurrence for each complication type investigated, including unplanned readmission, urinary tract infections, superficial surgical site infections, blood transfusion administration, return to the operating room, and deep organ space infections. Multivariable logistic spline regression demonstrated that operative time contributed more strongly to the odds of a complication for shorter procedures than longer procedures. This relationship was more pronounced for major complications than minor complications.CONCLUSION: Operative time is a stronger risk factor for developing complications for shorter duration procedures than longer procedures. This is especially evident in major complications such as return to the operating room and deep organ space infections. Our results suggest that longer procedure duration may not affect the likelihood of a complication as much as previously thought, and operative times should not be a primary factor in deciding to convert to laparotomy or alter post-operative management.

IMPLEMENTING “BUNDLED INTERVENTIONS” IN REDUCING SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS AMONG PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR GYNECOLOGICAL INDICATIONS – A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Objective: Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common infection among surgical patients. This study evaluated the impact of bundled interventions in reducing SSI rates in gynecological surgery. Therefore, it is a vital tool to improve patient safety. Methods: One hundred study participants were taken in the tertiary care hospital and divided into Group I and Group II. In Group I, 50 patients were involved in elective OT with bundled interventions, and in Group II, 50 controls operated in identical OT without bundled intervention. Incidence of SSI, type of SSI, antibiotic usage, need for secondary suturing, duration, etc., was noticed. Results: Our findings showed that six out of fifty cases developed the symptoms with a 10% SSI rate. Two had superficial SSI, and three had deep SSI. None of the patients had organ space SSI. In the control group, the SSI rate was 12%. The bundled intervention was associated with a significant reduction in infection rate. Conclusion: The study indicates that SSIs are associated with severe morbidity and mortality. It is a straightforward, feasible approach to the reduction of the SSI rate.

How reliable is the soft tissue radiological knee index in predicting superficial surgical site infection following total knee arthroplasty?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between the Soft Tissue Radiological Knee (SToRK) Index and the risk of developing a superficial surgical site infection (SSSI) following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The SToRK Index was measured using calibrated long leg radiographs (LLR) in 174 patients undergoing TKA. A moderate correlation was found between the SToRK Index and body mass index (BMI) (rs=0.574; p < 0.001). The SToRK Index was a better predictor of SSSI in females than males. In females, a SToRK Index cutoff of 2.01 had a sensitivity and specificity of 41.3% and 74.6% for developing SSSI, respectively, with a positive likelihood ratio of 1.63. The SToRK Index can be used as an additional tool in assessing the risk for SSSI after TKA. It might be more predictive in females due to the different fat distribution compared to males.

Association Between Operative Duration and Adverse Outcomes After Hip Fracture Surgery: A NSQIP Matched Cohort Study

BackgroundProlonged operative duration is an independent risk factor for surgical complications in numerous subspecialties. However, associations between adverse events and operative duration of hip fracture fixation in older adults have not been well-quantified. This study aims to determine if prolonged operative duration of hip fracture surgery is related to adverse outcomes. We hypothesized that patients with high operative durations experience greater rates of 30-day complications. MethodsThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was retrospectively reviewed to identify older adults (55 years and above) who underwent hip fracture fixation between 2015-2019. Prolonged operative duration was defined as >75th percentile, and cases were matched using propensity scores based on demographic, surgical, and comorbidity factors. Univariate differences in adverse events (including readmission, reoperation, mortality, and organ-system complications) were analyzed. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression analyses were completed for statistically significant events. ResultsA total of 8,827 case-control pairs were identified for comparison. Rates of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) (p = 0.022), any SSI (p = 0.032), and any complication (p<0.001) were elevated in those with prolonged surgical duration in univariate analyses. In multivariable models, prolonged operative time was associated with superficial SSI (OR 1.50, p = 0.019), any SSI (OR 1.35; p = 0.029) and any complication (OR 1.58; p<0.001). In subgroup analyses, all findings persisted for IMN with operative time associated with superficial SSI (OR 1.98, p = 0.012), any SSI (OR 1.71; p = 0.019), and any complication (OR 1.84; p<0.001). Operative time was associated only with any complication for hemiarthroplasty/internal fixation and sliding hip screw (OR 1.27 and 1.89, respectively; p<0.001). ConclusionOur study demonstrates that duration of surgery is an independent risk factor for superficial SSI, any SSI, and any complication. Notably, our findings suggest that high operative durations may be most concerning for SSIs in IMN fixation, which is currently the most common choice for hip fracture fixation in the US. However, the rate of any complication is significantly elevated when surgical duration is prolonged, regardless of surgery type.

Modified 5-Item Frailty Index: A Useful Tool for Assessing the Impact of Frailty on Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality Following Surgical Fixation of Thoracolumbar Fractures

The modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5) is a comorbidity-based risk stratification tool to predict adverse events following various neurological surgeries. This study aims to quantify the association between increased mFI-5 and postoperative complications and mortality following surgical fixation of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. The 2011-2021 American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) dataset was used to identify patients undergoing fusion surgeries for thoracolumbar spine fractures. The mFI-5 score was calculated based on the presence of five major comorbidities: congestive heart failure within 30 days before surgery, insulin-dependent or noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, partially dependent or totally dependent functional health status at the time of surgery, and hypertension requiring medication. Multivariate analysis assessed the independent impact of increasing mFI-5 scores on postoperative 30-day morbidity and mortality while controlling for baseline clinical characteristics. A total of 66,904 patients were included in our analysis (54.2% female, mean age 62.27 ± 12.93 years). On univariate analysis, higher mFI-5 score was significantly associated with increased risks of superficial surgical site infection, deep surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, unplanned reoperation, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, postoperative ventilator use, progressive renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, bleeding requiring transfusion, sepsis, septic shock, and longer hospital length of stay (LOS). On multivariate logistic regression, increasing mFI-5 score versus a mFI-5 score of zero was associated with higher odds of overall complications (mFI-5 ≥2: odds ratio [OR] 1.38 CI: 1.24 - 1.54, p<0.001; mFI-5 = 1: OR 1.18 CI: 1.11 - 1.24, p<0.001) and 30-day mortality (mFI-5 ≥2: OR 2.33 CI: 1.60 - 3.38, p<0.001). This study demonstrates that frailty, when measured using the mFI-5, independently predicts postoperative complications, hospital LOS, and 30-day mortality after surgical repair of thoracolumbar fractures. These findings are important for risk stratification in patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion surgery and for standardization in reporting outcomes after those procedures.

Clinical Benefits of Reducing Dead Space Using a Closed Suction Drain and Subcutaneous Large-bite Buried Suture Technique to Prevent Superficial Surgical-site Infections Following Primary Closure of a Diverting Stoma.

Surgical-site infections (SSIs) are the most common complication after stoma closure. We propose a new method for wound closure using the subcutaneous large-bite buried suture (SLBS) technique and a closed suction drain (CSD). In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of a combination of the SLBS technique and a CSD to prevent superficial SSIs following stoma closure. We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent stoma closure between January 2019 and July 2022. Primary closure of the stomal site was performed using the SLBS technique and a CSD for wound closure. The CSD was placed until postoperative day 7. The occurrence of superficial postoperative SSIs was also evaluated. In total, 67 patients were included in the study. Within 30 days postoperatively, nine patients (13%) developed superficial SSIs. Considering the type of stoma, only 1 (2%) of 45 patients with ileostomy showed superficial SSIs, whereas 8 (36%) of 22 patients with colostomy showed superficial SSIs. Univariate analysis of the risk factors associated with the occurrence of superficial SSIs revealed that colostomy (p < 0.001) and hand-sewn anastomosis were significant risk factors (p = 0.019). Multivariate analysis of the risk factors associated with the occurrence of superficial SSIs revealed that colostomy was significant risk factor (p = 0.003). This new method of stoma closure is feasible for preventing superficial SSIs, especially in ileostomy closure.

Plastic Wound Protector vs Surgical Gauze for Surgical Site Infection Reduction in Open GI Surgery

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are prevalent hospital-acquired infections with significant patient impacts and global health care burdens. The World Health Organization recommends using wound protector devices in abdominal surgery as a preventive measure to lower the risk of SSIs despite limited evidence. To examine the efficacy of a dual-ring, plastic wound protector in lowering the SSI rate in open gastrointestinal (GI) surgery irrespective of intra-abdominal contamination levels. This multicenter, patient-blinded, parallel-arm randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 2017 to October 2022 at 13 hospitals in an academic setting. Patients undergoing open abdominal bowel surgery (eg, for bowel perforation) were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized 1:1 to a dual-ring, plastic wound protector to protect the incision site of the abdominal wall (experimental group) or a conventional surgical gauze (control group). The primary end point was the rate of SSI within 30 days of open GI surgery. A total of 458 patients were randomized; after 1 was excluded from the control group, 457 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (mean [SD] age, 58.4 [12.1] years; 256 [56.0%] male; 341 [74.6%] with a clean-contaminated wound): 229 in the wound protector group and 228 in the surgical gauze group. The overall SSI rate in the intention-to-treat analysis was 15.7% (72 of 458 patients). The SSI rate for the wound protector was 10.9% (25 of 229 patients) compared with 20.5% (47 of 229 patients) with surgical gauze. The wound protector significantly reduced the risk of SSI, with a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 46.81% (95% CI, 16.64%-66.06%). The wound protector significantly decreased the SSI rate for clean-contaminated wounds (RRR, 43.75%; 95% CI, 3.75%-67.13%), particularly for superficial SSIs (RRR, 42.50%; 95% CI, 7.16%-64.39%). Length of hospital stay was similar in both groups (mean [SD], 15.2 [10.5] vs 15.3 [10.2] days), as were the overall postoperative complication rates (20.1% vs 18.8%). This randomized clinical trial found a significant reduction in SSI rates when a plastic wound protector was used during open GI surgery compared with surgical gaze, supporting the World Health Organization recommendation for use of wound protector devices in abdominal surgery. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03170843.

Prophylactic Transversely Hemisected Sartorius Flap for High-Risk Groin Dissections in Vascular Surgery—A Case Series

Groin wound dehiscence and infection are a common complication of femoral artery exposure. In patients with prosthetic conduits placed in the groin, these complications can lead to graft infection or anastomotic dehiscence with hemorrhage. Sartorius flaps can be useful in preventing graft infections or anastomotic breakdown in the setting of wound infections. Prophylactic sartorius flaps have been suggested to be a useful adjunct in patients who are at high risk for groin complications. Standard sartorius flaps can be difficult to perform and increase the operative time. We present our experience with a modified sartorius flap, a Transversely Hemisected Sartorius (THT), which avoids dissection to the anterior superior iliac spine. Patients who received femoral artery exposure and a modified prophylactic sartorius flap were included in this case series. The Penn Groin Assessment Scale (PGAS) was calculated for each patient and our primary outcome was the rate of deep space wound infections. Fifteen patients received a THT muscle flap. The average age of the cohort was 67.5 (35-86) years. Eight (50%) were male. The mean PGAS was 2.5 (0-6). Eight (50%) groins had a prosthetic conduit underlying the flap. Four (25%) patients had infrainguinal bypass, 3 (18.8%) for femoral-femoral bypass, and 1 (6.3%) patient received aortic-bifemoral bypass. Eight (50%) patients received sartorius flap after femoral artery exposure for thromboembolectomy, endarterectomy, or access complications. Six (37.5%) patients developed superficial surgical site infections however no deep space infections or prosthetic graft excisions resulted. This procedure was effective in preventing graft infections in all patients with high-risk features for groin infection in our retrospective case series. The segmental blood supply is maintained while providing good coverage of the femoral vessels with this rotational flap.

The Effect of Vancomycin and Tobramycin Local Antibiotic Powder on Surgical Site Infections After Open Treatment of Fracture: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Analysis.

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of vancomycin/tobramycin local antibiotic powder (LAP) on surgical site infections (SSIs) after open treatment of fractures. This was a retrospective comparative study with propensity matching. The study was set in an urban level 1 trauma center. Patients undergoing open procedures for fracture performed by a single surgeon before and after cessation of routine LAP use were included. Deep and superficial SSIs were the measured outcomes. There were 652 open procedures for fracture performed by a single surgeon: LAP was used in 36.7% (114/310) of procedures before stopping its use, after which 342 procedures were performed without LAP. Comparison of all procedures performed with and without routine LAP use demonstrated no difference in infection rates, although there was a trend for the group without LAP to have fewer superficial SSIs (proportional difference [PD] -2.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.1% to 0.1%; P = 0.05) and more deep SSIs (PD 3.9%, 95% CI, -0.2% to 7.9%; P = 0.06). Prematch analysis demonstrated that LAP use was associated with external fixation (PD 8.5%, 95% CI, 1.6%-16.2%; P = 0.005), longer operative times (median difference 56.0 minutes, 95% CI, 39.0-74.0; P < 0.0001), greater estimated blood loss (median difference 70.0, 95% CI, 50.0-100.0; P < 0.0001), and no difference in superficial (PD 2.4%; 95% CI, -0.8% to 6.8%; P = 0.07) or deep SSIs (PD -1.6%, 95% CI, -6.2% to 4.1%; P = 0.54). After propensity matching (108 vs. 108) to control for the above differences, the LAP group, compared with the no LAP group, had no difference in superficial SSIs and was less likely to have deep SSIs (PD -8.3%, 95% CI, -16.2% to -0.2%; P = 0.04). The use of vancomycin and tobramycin LAP lowered the rate of deep SSIs after open treatment of fractures on propensity-matched analysis. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Obesity Portends Increasing Rates of Superficial Surgical Site Infection Following Pediatric Reduction Mammoplasty: A National Surgical Database Analysis.

Pediatric reduction mammoplasty has become increasingly common due to the obesity epidemic. While obesity remains the leading cause of macromastia leading to surgery, it may also be a risk factor for postoperative complications. This study examines the safety of pediatric reduction mammoplasty and the risk of obesity for complications following this procedure. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatrics was queried to obtain all reduction mammoplasty cases from 2012 to 2020. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses controlling for confounders were carried out to assess the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and rates of complication. One thousand five hundred eighty-nine patients with the primary Current Procedural Terminology code 19318 were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 16.6 (SD, 1.1) years, and the mean BMI was 30.5 (SD, 6.2) lb/in2. Notably, 49% of the patients were obese, and 31% were overweight, while only 0.4% were underweight. Forty-three patients (2.7%) sustained a superficial surgical site infection (SSI) postoperatively. Other complications were less prevalent, including deep SSI (4 patients, 0.3%), dehiscence (11, 0.7%), reoperation (21, 1%), and readmission (26, 1.6%).Independent variables analyzed included age, sex, BMI, diabetes mellitus, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and operative time, of which only BMI and ASA class were found to be significantly associated with SSI on univariate analysis. On multivariate logistic regression while controlling for ASA class and the false discovery rate, there was a strong association between increasing rates of superficial SSI and increasing BMI (unit odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, [1.01, 1.09]; P = 0.02). The OR indicates that for each 1-unit increase in BMI, the odds of SSI increase by 5%. Complications following pediatric reduction mammoplasty are uncommon, demonstrating the safety of this procedure. High BMI was found to have a significantly higher risk for superficial SSI. Increased caution and infection prophylaxis should be taken when performing this operation on obese patients.

373 Modified 5-Item Frailty Index: A Useful Tool for Assessing the Impact of Frailty on Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality Following Surgical Fixation of Thoracolumbar Fractures

INTRODUCTION: The modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5) is a comorbidity-based risk stratification tool that has been shown to predict adverse events following various neurological surgeries. METHODS: The 2011-2021 American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) dataset was used to identify patients undergoing fusion surgeries for thoracolumbar spine fractures. The mFI-5 score was calculated based on the presence of the 5 comorbidities: congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, partially dependent or totally dependent functional health status, and hypertension. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the independent impact of increasing mFI-5 score on postoperative 30-day morbidity and mortality while controlling for baseline clinical characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 66,904 patients were included in our analysis (54.2% female, mean age 62.27 ± 12.93 years). On univariate analysis, higher mFI-5 score was significantly associated with increased risks of superficial surgical site infection(SSI), deep SSI, wound dehiscence, unplanned reoperation, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, postoperative ventilator use, progressive renal insufficiency, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, bleeding requiring transfusion, sepsis, septic shock, and longer hospital length of stay (LOS). On multivariate logistic regression, increasing mFI-5 score versus mFI-5 = 0 was associated with higher odds of overall complications (mFI-5 =2: odds ratio [OR] 1.44 CI: 1.35–1.52, p &lt; 0.001; mFI-5 = 1: OR 1.18 CI: 1.12–1.24, p &lt; 0.001) and 30-day mortality (mFI-5 =2: OR 2.32 CI: 1.60–3.37, p &lt; 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that frailty, when measured using the mFI-5, independently predicts postoperative complications, hospital LOS, and 30-day mortality after surgical repair of thoracolumbar fractures. These findings are important for risk stratification in patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion surgery and for standardization in reporting outcomes after those procedures.

The Impact of an Evidence-Based Bundle on Cesarean Section-Related Surgical Site Infections: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract Objective To compare the effectiveness of an evidence-based bundle in minimizing cesarean section (CS)-related surgical site infections (SSIs) with that of standard routine care. Methods This was a single-center, parallel, and randomized clinical trial conducted at KAHER’s Dr. Prabhakar Kore Charitable Hospital, Belagavi, India, from January 2021 to December 31, 2021. Three hundred twenty women undergoing CS delivery were selected and allocated into two groups (1:1) using simple randomization with fixed allocation. An evidence-based surgical bundle (a combination of more than three perioperative interventions) was used for the intervention group, whereas the control group received routine standard perioperative care. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI (superficial, deep, and organ or space SSIs) within 6 weeks postpartum in both groups. Categorical and continuous data were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests with a significance threshold set at P &lt; 0.05. Results In this study, 16 and 17 participants each from the control and intervention groups, respectively, were lost to follow-up, resulting in a total of 144 and 143 study participants included in the respective groups. Twenty-eight (19.4%) and 14 (9.8%) women developed SSI in the control and intervention groups, respectively (P = 0.02). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was the most common cause of SSI in both groups (63.6% (7/11) and 100% (3/3) in the control and intervention groups, respectively). Conclusion The use of the evidence-based bundle for CS-related SSI prevention effectively decreased the incidence of SSI by half compared to standard routine practice. Implementing the use of this bundle in routine perioperative care will reduce the cost of CS and improve health outcomes in CS. Trial registration Clinical Trials Registry-India (www.ctri.nic.in). Registration number: CTRI/2020/11/029246.

Real-World Evidence of the Impact of a Novel Surgical Irrigant on Surgical Site Infections in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed at an Ambulatory Surgery Center.

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common inpatient and outpatient surgical procedures performed in the United States and is predicted to increase 401% by 2040. Surgical site infections (SSIs) at an incidence rate of approximately 2% are costly post-operative complications in TKA. Intra-operative surgical irrigants are used to decrease contaminating microbial bioburden within the surgical site to prevent SSI. The primary objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of a novel surgical irrigant called XPERIENCE® Advanced Surgical Irrigation (XP; Next Science, Jacksonville, FL) on SSI incidence in primary TKA performed at an ambulatory surgery center (ASC). Patients and Methods: Primary TKAs were performed at a free-standing ASC. The novel surgical irrigant was used intra-operatively to rinse away debris and micro-organisms from the surgical site. Retrospective data collation included SSI rates, complication rates, and re-admissions due to SSI within 90 days of index surgery. Results: Among the 524 primary TKA surgeries, one peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) was diagnosed within 90 days of index surgery and one superficial incisional SSI was diagnosed within 30 days of index surgery. The PJI was attributed to an exogenously acquired upper respiratory tract infection rather than due to the failure of intra-operative regimes. The 0.19% PJI incidence rate indicated significant efficacy of XP in decreasing PJI. An overall complication rate of 7.82% was noted with none of the complications associated with usage of the novel surgical irrigant. Conclusions: XPERIENCE is a promising intra-operative antimicrobial irrigant that can be easily incorporated into a broader infection prevention strategy.

Effects of Preoperative Glucocorticoid Use on Patients Undergoing Single-Level Lumbar Fusions: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Registry Study.

Objective Spinal fusions are gaining popularity as a means of treating spinal deformity and instability from a range of pathologies. The prevalence of glucocorticoid use has also increased in recent decades, and their systemic effects are well-documented. Although commonly used in the preoperative period, the effects of steroids on outcomes amongpatients undergoing spinal fusions are inadequately described. This study compares the oddsof developing complications amongpatients who underwent single-level lumbar fusions with and without preoperative glucocorticoid use in hopes of establishing more evidence-based parameters for guiding preoperative steroid use. Methods The TriNetX multi-institutional electronic health record database was used to perform a retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis of clinical outcomes of two cohorts of patients who underwent posterior or posterolateral single-level lumbar fusions with and without interbody fusion, those who used glucocorticoids for at least one week within a year of fusion and those who did not. The outcomes of interest were examined within 30 days of the operation and included death, reoperation, deep or superficial surgical site infection (SSI), pneumonia, reintubation, ventilator dependence, tracheostomy, acute kidney injury (AKI), renal insufficiency, pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep venous thrombosis (DVT), urinary tract infection (UTI), emergency department (ED) visit, sepsis, and myocardial infarction (MI). Results The odds of developing pneumonia within 30 days of spinal fusion in the cohort that used glucocorticoids within one year of operation compared to the cohort without glucocorticoid use was 0.67 (p≤0.001, 95% CI: 0.59-0.69). The odds of requiring a tracheostomy within 30 days of spinal fusion in the cohort that used glucocorticoids within one year of operation compared to the cohort without glucocorticoid use was 0.39 (p≤0.001, 95% CI: 0.26-0.60).The odds of reoperation, deep and superficial SSI, and ED visits within 30 days of operation were significantly higher for the same glucocorticoid-receiving cohort, with odds ratios of 1.4 (p=0.003, 95% CI: 1.11-1.65), 1.86 (p≤0.001, 95% CI: 1.31-2.63), 2.28 (p≤0.001, 95% CI: 1.57-3.31), and 1.25 (p≤0.001, 95% CI: 1.17-1.33), respectively. After propensity score-matching, there was no significant difference between the odds of death, DVT, PE, MI, UTI, AKI, sepsis, reintubation, and ventilator dependence between the two cohorts. Conclusion In support of much of the current literature regarding preoperative glucocorticoid use and rates of complications, patients who underwent a single-level lumbar fusion and have used glucocorticoids for at least a week within a year of operation experienced significantly higher odds of reoperation, deep and superficial SSI, and ED visits. However, these patients using glucocorticoids were also found to have lower odds of developing pneumonia, renal insufficiency, and tracheostomy requirement than those who did not use steroids within a year of surgery.

Robotic-arm-assisted conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to describe a novel robotic-arm-assisted UKA to TKA conversion technique and evaluate the patient reported and clinical outcomes in these patients. MethodsA retrospective review between 2017 and 2022 was conducted of patients that underwent robotic-arm-assisted UKA to TKA conversion. Charts were reviewed for patient demographics, indications for conversion from UKA to TKA, operative technique, implants used, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The surgical technique resembles that of primary TKA, with the major exception of registering the robotic arm with retained UKA implants and removing the implants only when verification is complete. There were 44 robotic-arm-assisted UKAs in 41 patients were included in the study. Indications for UKA conversion to TKA included: 33 patients who had osteoarthritis progression (75%), 7 aseptic loosening (16%), 2 unspecified pain (4.5%), 1 polyethylene wear (2.3%), and 1 prosthetic joint infection (2.3%). Uncemented cruciate-retaining (CR) implants were used in 38 of the 44 robotic-arm-assisted TKAs (86.5%). The other six utilized cemented implants: four CR femurs (9.1%), six tibial baseplates (13.6%), four tibial stems (9.1%), and four medial tibial augments (9.1%). ResultsThe PROMs significantly improved at 1-year follow-up, with the average KOOS JR score increasing from 48.1 to 68.7 (P < 0.001), and the r-WOMAC score decreasing from 25.7 to 10.6 (P = 0.003). Two patients developed prosthetic joint infections (4.5%), one developed aseptic loosening of the femoral component (2.3%), and one developed a superficial surgical site infection requiring superficial irrigation and debridement (2.3%). Overall survivorship was 93.18% at 1.8 years, and aseptic survivorship was 97.73%. ConclusionRobotic-arm-assisted UKA to TKA conversion exhibited improved patient-reported outcomes and low revision and complication rates. Improved implant placement achieved with robotic-arm-assistance may improve the functional and clinical outcomes following these surgeries.

To close or not to close? Wound management in emergent colorectal surgery, an EAST Multicenter prospective cohort study.

To determine the clinical impact of wound management technique on surgical site infection (SSI), hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality in emergent colorectal surgery. A prospective observational study (2021-2023) of urgent or emergent colorectal surgery patients at 15 institutions was conducted. Pediatric patients and traumatic colorectal injuries were excluded. Patients were classified by wound closure technique: skin closed (SC), skin loosely closed (SLC), or skin open (SO). Primary outcomes were SSI, hospital LOS and in-hospital mortality rates. Multivariable regression was used to assess the effect of wound closure on outcomes after controlling for demographics, patient characteristics, ICU admission, vasopressor use, procedure details and wound class. A priori power analysis indicated that 138 patients per group were required to detect a 10% difference in mortality rates. In total, 557 patients were included (SC n = 262, SLC n = 124, SO n = 171). Statistically significant differences in BMI, race/ethnicity, ASA scores, EBL, ICU admission, vasopressor therapy, procedure details, and wound class were observed across groups (Table 1). Overall, average LOS was 16.9 ± 16.4 days, and rates of in-hospital mortality and SSI were 7.9% and 18.5%, respectively, with the lowest rates observed in the SC group (Table 2). After risk adjustment, SO was associated with increased risk of mortality (OR = 3.003, p = 0.028 in comparison to the SC group. SLC was associated with increased risk of superficial SSI (OR = 3.439, p = 0.014), after risk adjustment. When compared to the SC group, the SO group was associated with mortality, but comparable when considering all other outcomes, while the SLC was associated with increased superficial SSI. Complete skin closure may be a viable wound management technique in emergent colorectal surgery. Level III Therapeutic/Care Management.

Incidence and associated factors of surgical site infection in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery: a 7-year cohort study

Surgical site infections (SSI) constitute 31% of all hospital-acquired conditions, with ankle and foot surgical procedures showing an incidence of SSI ranging from 0.5% to 6.5%. This study aimed to assess the incidence of both superficial and deep surgical site infections in foot and ankle surgery, along with associated factors. Conducted as a retrospective cohort study, it included 2180 patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery in a private hospital between 2014 and 2020, encompassing elective and trauma cases. Outcome variables comprised SSI, while predictor variables encompassed sex, age, diabetes mellitus, systemic arterial hypertension, smoking, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and body mass index. Logistic regression models were employed to identify associations between study variables. The incidence of surgical site infections stood at 4% (83/2180), comprising a rate of 2.8% (57/2180) for superficial infections and 1.2% (26/2180) for deep infections. Smoking (OR 2.9, 95%CI 1.4–5.3) and ASA score >2 (OR 3.4, 95%CI 1.2–8.4) emerged as independent factors associated with surgical site infections. The group with deep infections exhibited higher proportions of smokers (p = 0.002), systemic arterial hypertension (p = 0.018), trauma surgery (p = 0.049), and an ASA score >2 (p = 0.011). Overall infection incidence in this cohort reached 4%, with trauma cases, smoking, hypertension, and an ASA score >2 independently linked to deep infections. Surgeons should be cognizant of these risk factors when managing prophylactic antibiotic regimens for patients.