Superficial Soft Tissue Sarcomas Research Articles

Regional hyperthermia for soft tissue sarcoma – a survey on current practice, controversies and consensus among 12 European centers

Purpose To analyze the current practice of regional hyperthermia (RHT) for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at 12 European centers to provide an overview, find consensuses and identify controversies necessary for future guidelines and clinical trials. Methods In this cross-sectional survey study, a 27-item questionnaire assessing clinical subjects and procedural details on RHT for STS was distributed to 12 European cancer centers for RHT. Results We have identified seven controversies and five consensus points. Of 12 centers, 6 offer both, RHT with chemotherapy (CTX) or with radiotherapy (RT). Two centers only offer RHT with CTX and four centers only offer RHT with RT. All 12 centers apply RHT for localized, high-risk STS of the extremities, trunk wall and retroperitoneum. However, eight centers also use RHT in metastatic STS, five in palliative STS, eight for superficial STS and six for low-grade STS. Pretherapeutic imaging for RHT treatment planning is used by 10 centers, 9 centers set 40–43 °C as the intratumoral target temperature, and all centers use skin detectors or probes in body orifices for thermometry. Discussion There is disagreement regarding the integration of RHT in contemporary interdisciplinary care of STS patients. Many clinical controversies exist that require a standardized consensus guideline and innovative study ideas. At the same time, our data has shown that existing guidelines and decades of experience with the technique of RHT have mostly standardized procedural aspects. Conclusions The provided results may serve as a basis for future guidelines and inform future clinical trials for RHT in STS patients.

The Role of Postoperative Radiotherapy in the Management of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans: A Multidisciplinary Systematic Review.

Background: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a superficial soft tissue sarcoma, and surgical excision is the first-line treatment. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an update about the current indications and clinical results regarding the use of postoperative radiotherapy in DSFP, considering both adjuvant and salvage setting. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review using the main scientific database, including Cochrane library, Scopus, and PubMed, for any relevant article about the topic, and we considered all available papers without any time restriction. Results: Twenty-two papers, published between 1989 and 2023, were retrieved and considered eligible for inclusion in this review. Regarding the fractionation schedules, most authors reported using standard fractionation (2 Gy/die) with a wide total dose ranging from 50 to 70 Gy. The local control after postoperative radiotherapy was excellent (75-100%), with a median follow-up time of 69 months. Conclusions: After the primary surgical management of DFSP, postoperative radiotherapy may either be considered as adjuvant treatment (presence of risk factors, i.e., close margins, recurrent tumours, aggressive histological subtypes) or as salvage treatment (positive margins) and should be assessed within the frame of multidisciplinary evaluation.

CORR Insights®: Do Patients Treated With an Unplanned Resection for Small Superficial Soft Tissue Sarcomas Have Worse Long-term Survival Than Those Initially Treated With an Oncologic Resection?

CORR Insights®: Do Patients Treated With an Unplanned Resection for Small Superficial Soft Tissue Sarcomas Have Worse Long-term Survival Than Those Initially Treated With an Oncologic Resection?

Do Patients Treated With an Unplanned Resection for Small Superficial Soft Tissue Sarcomas Have Worse Long-term Survival Than Those Initially Treated With an Oncologic Resection?

Histologic grade, size, and depth are well-known prognostic factors in soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Small (< 5 cm) and superficial STS generally have an excellent prognosis when treated with appropriate surgery. However, they are often misdiagnosed and mistreated. We reported that in midterm follow-up (5 to 7 years), patients with unplanned resections of tumors with positive margins who immediately underwent a reoperation with margin-widening re-resection and postoperative radiotherapy had survival comparable to that of patients who were initially treated correctly. In that article, we included STS larger than 5 cm, deep STS, and individuals with local recurrence. However, we wanted to evaluate the impact of unplanned resection on the survival of patients who had STS with the best prognosis, small and superficial STS, with two groups that were as homogeneous as possible. Do patients with small and superficial STS who underwent an unplanned resection have worse prognosis in the long term than those who were initially treated correctly? We exclusively evaluated patients with small (< 5 cm) and superficial (to the deep fascia) STS. We systematically excluded deep STS. Among this subset, we identified 93 patients with superficial STS. We excluded patients with local relapse, metastatic disease, superficial STS of the head or neck, those with insufficient clinical or dosimetric information, and patients with follow-up of less than 2 years. Furthermore, our focus on investigating the most benign and homogeneous STS prompted us to exclude patients with superficial tumors greater than or equal to 5 cm. This selection was driven by the presumed better prognosis associated with smaller tumors, inevitably leading to a smaller pool of patients for direct comparison with patients who had unplanned resections. The initial expectation was to observe similar survival outcomes between cohorts. Between 1990 and 2019, a total of 17 patients underwent surgical treatment at our private, medium-size center. Of those, 29% (5 patients) were lost to follow-up before 2 years without meeting a study endpoint (relapse, metastasis or revision, reoperation, or death), leaving a total of 71% (12 patients) of the original group who had either follow-up of at least 2 years or who met a study endpoint before that minimum surveillance duration. They were treated with surgery alone. During that same period, another 51 patients were referred to us after undergoing an unplanned resection of a lesion that subsequently was determined to be a soft tissue malignancy. Of those, 18% (9 patients) were lost to follow-up before 2 years without meeting a study endpoint, leaving 82% (42 patients) of the original group who had either follow-up of at least 2 years or who met a study endpoint before that minimum surveillance duration. They were treated with re-excision and postoperative radiotherapy. Patients with unplanned resections had an older mean age (51± 5 versus 44 ± 7 years; p = 0.1) and a higher proportion of female patients (58% versus 38%; p = 0.07), but the groups did not differ in terms of largest diameter, histologic type, or tumor location. However, patients with planned resections had a higher proportion of high-grade STS (75% versus 55%; p = 0.07). No metastases were present in either group at diagnosis. We performed a univariate analysis of the groups. We could not perform a multivariate analysis because of the small sample. We compared the groups in terms of local recurrence and all-cause mortality using the Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimator. According to the Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimator, survivorship free from local recurrence at a mean of 20 years of follow-up was better in the planned resection group than in the unplanned resection group (92% [95% CI 63% to 100%] versus 69% [95% CI 54% to 81%]; p = 0.04). Furthermore, overall survivorship at 5 years was higher in the planned resection group than in the unplanned resection group (100% [95% CI 72% to 100%] versus 70% [95% CI 54% to 81%]; p = 0.04). Similarly, the planned resection group exhibited superior survivorship at 20 years of follow-up (100% [95% CI 72% to 100%] versus 62% [95% CI 47% to 75%]; p = 0.01). Metastatic disease was absent in the planned resection group, while it occurred in 12 patients in the unplanned resection group (28% [95% CI 17% to 44%]). Unplanned resection for patients with small and superficial STS was associated with a decrease in overall survival in the long term, despite the use of postoperative radiotherapy. An unplanned resection may be an important prognostic factor. Nevertheless, larger and prospective studies are needed to validate our findings. Although small and superficial lumps are usually benign, nonsarcoma surgeons should be aware that some masses may be malignant, and if in doubt, MR imaging, a biopsy before excision, or consultation with or referral to a sarcoma center should be considered before removing the mass. Level III, therapeutic study.

Benchmarking Time-to-Treatment Initiation in Sarcoma Care Using Real-World-Time Data.

Benchmarking is a fundamental tool for enhancing quality within a patient-centered healthcare framework. This study presents an analysis of time-to-treatment initiation (TTI) for sarcoma patients, utilizing a database encompassing 266 cases from the Swiss Sarcoma Network. Our findings indicate a median TTI of 30 days across the cohort, with bone sarcomas and deep soft tissue sarcomas demonstrating a shorter median TTI of 28 days, followed by superficial soft tissue sarcomas at 42 days. The data reveal that the use of real-world-time data (RWTD) may account for a longer TTI observed, as it offers more comprehensive capture of patient journeys, unlike conventional datasets. Notably, variability in TTI was observed between different treatment institutions, which underscores the need for standardized processes across centers. We advocate for a selective referral system to specialized centers to prevent capacity overload and ensure timely treatment initiation. Our analysis also identified significant delays in TTI for unplanned 'whoops'-resections, highlighting the importance of early specialist referral in optimizing treatment timelines. This study emphasizes the potential benefits of a streamlined, data-informed approach to sarcoma care. However, further research is required to establish the direct impact of integrated care models on TTI and patient outcomes in the context of sarcoma treatment.

Unplanned excision of extremity and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcomas

Unplanned excision of extremity and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcomas

Superficial soft tissue sarcomas: 10‑year survival outcomes.

Cutaneous sarcomas comprise a broad group of rare, heterogeneous mesenchymal tumours. The present report describes a single centre experience regarding the management and the outcomes of patients with superficial soft tissue sarcomas (SSTS). Key prognostic factors in predicting overall survival (OS) and local relapse-free survival were determined. Data from 66 patients with SSTS treated surgically within Edinburgh and Lothian were collected in the context of a service evaluation. Patient demographics, tumour specifics and treatment, as well as 5-year OS and local recurrence, were analysed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied for survival curves, and mortality rate estimation and Cox regression were used to establish independent predictors. The mean estimated OS time was 57.2 months, with a 95% CI between 55.0 and 59.5 months. The median OS time could not be estimated because there is no time point during which the survival function has a value <50%. The death risk for a person with SSTS was increased by 7.3% (odds ratio, 1.073; 95% CI, 1.012-1.138) for every additional year of life. The estimated mean local relapse time was 58.5 months, with a 95% CI between 56 and 61 months. The median local relapse time could not be estimated since there is no time point during which the local recurrence function has a value <50%. In conclusion, out of all independent variables considered, none could statistically significantly explicate local relapse recurrence time. It is important that these rare tumours are treated in the context of a multidisciplinary team with consensus guidelines to assist decision-making.

Tumor-skin invasion is a reliable risk factor for poor prognosis in superficial soft tissue sarcomas.

Superficial soft tissue sarcomas are often left untreated unless they invade the skin and skin ulcers manifest. Progressive sarcomas frequently result in dismal oncological outcomes despite multidisciplinary treatment. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors for superficial soft tissue sarcomas. This study retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological data of 82 patients with superficial soft tissue sarcomas treated between August 2003 and December 2020 at our institution. A superficial soft tissue sarcoma was defined if the percentage of the area occupied by the tumor in the assessed region (skin, subcutaneous) was more than 50%. Age, sex, location, tumor size, tumor-skin invasion, tumor grade, and distant metastasis at initial diagnosis were evaluated as potential prognostic factors. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify the prognostic factors. Five-year survival rates were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The mean follow-up time was 60.1 months. The 5-year overall survival, 5-year local recurrence-free survival, and 5-year metastasis survival rates were 76.4%, 60.6%, and 71.0%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed significant relationships between poor prognosis and tumor size ≥5 cm, distant metastasis at initial diagnosis, and tumor-skin invasion. In the multivariate analysis, only the tumor-skin invasion was associated with worse overall survival. Superficial soft tissue sarcomas have biologically been considered a separate category due to their better prognosis. In this study, the tumor-skin invasion was the only significant factor associated with a poor prognosis. Therefore, all superficial soft tissue sarcomas without tumor-skin invasion should be treated as early as possible.

Review of primary superficial soft tissue mesenchymal tumors of malignant or intermediate biological potential.

The majority of the sarcomas are deep in location, larger than 5cm in size, and heterogenous in imaging appearance. However, when sarcomas occur superficially, these typical features may be absent, failing to alert the radiologist to a malignancy and mimicking one of the more numerous benign superficial tumors that make up the bulk of soft tissue mass evaluations. This manuscript will discuss the current role of imaging in recognizing features concerning for superficial soft tissue sarcomas. Provided is an overview of the demographic, clinical, and imaging features of the most commonly encountered superficial soft tissue sarcomas, including undifferentiated pleomorphic, leiomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, liposarcoma, myxofibrosarcoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, epithelioid sarcoma, and angiosarcoma. A less common but primary superficial tumor, angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma, is also reviewed as the diagnosis may be confounding both clinically and on imaging studies.

Refining the Approach to Patients with Primary Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities and Trunk Wall: Outcome Improvement Over Time at a Single Institution.

The improved outcome of extremity soft tissue sarcoma patients surgically treated until 2007 at the authors' institution was previously reported. This study updates the analysis at a later follow-up and extends the patients'cohort to assess changes in outcomes over time for extremity and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcoma (ESTSTS) treated at a single referral center. All consecutive patients with primary localized adult-type ESTSTSsurgically treated at the authors' institution between 1987 and 2017 wereincluded and divided into group 1 (1987-2002) and group 2 (2003-2017) according to primary surgery year. Crude cumulative incidence (CCI) of sarcoma-specific mortality (SSM), local recurrence (LR), and distant metastases (DM)were calculated in a competing-risks framework. DM-free survival (DMFS) and post-DM survivalwere also assessed. The study identified 2382 patients. The median follow-up was 104 months (range, 63-127 months), and the post-DM follow-up was 76 months (range, 37-126 months). Since 2003, an increased adoption of preoperative treatments was observed: the use ofchemotherapy, radiotherapy and combined chemoradiotherapy went from 10.5% to 23.7%, from 1.7% to 17.8%, and from 1% to 11.8%respectively. This change in treatment strategies was associated to an improvementin CCI-SSM (27.8% vs 19.5%; P < 0.001), CCI-LR (14.1 vs 7.5%; P < 0.001), DMFS (57.9% vs 65.8%; P = 0.004), and post-DM (12.2% vs 20.1%; P = 0.012), but not in CCI-DM. Increased adoption of preoperative treatments and greater availability of medical agents in the recent years were associated to better outcomes. New treatments are eagerly awaited for further improvement of outcome for ESTSTS patients because no major changes have been observed since 2003.

Preoperative Radiation for Soft Tissue Sarcomas: How Much Is Needed?

Preoperative radiation therapy is an important component of curative treatment for extremity and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcomas. It has traditionally been delivered to a dose of 50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions over 5 weeks. With significant advances in the multidisciplinary approach to soft tissue sarcomas, preoperative radiation therapy may be omitted for certain cases, delivered over a shortened period of time (1-3 weeks), deintensified for myxoid liposarcomas, or combined with systemic therapy to improve the therapeutic ratio. This article reviews the innovative preoperative radiation therapy strategies currently used to treat extremity and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcomas.

Unplanned Excision of Extremity and Trunk Wall Soft Tissue Sarcoma: To Re-resect or Not to Re-resect?

The need for systematic reexcision in patients who underwent unplanned excision (UE) for extremity and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcoma (ESTSTS) has been questioned. We investigated the outcome of patients who underwent reexcision for ESTSTS compared with primarily resected at our institution and the prognostic impact of microscopic residual disease (MR) in the reexcision specimen. Primary ESTSTS patients surgically treated at our institution between 1997 and 2017 were divided in three groups: primarily resected (A), reexcised after macroscopically complete UE (B), and incomplete UE (C). Weighted overall survival (OS), crude cumulative incidence of local relapse (CCI-LR), and distant metastasis (CCI-DM) were calculated and compared. In group B, multivariable models were performed to assess factors associated with the outcomes. A total of 1962 patients were identified: 1076,697 and 189 in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Overall median follow-up was 85 months. Seven-year weighted-OS was 73.8%, 84.1%, and 80.7% (p < 0.001) for groups A, B, and C respectively. Seven-year CCI-LR and DM were 5.0% and 25.3%, 12.1% and 15.8%, and 13.6% and 29.4% (both p < 0.001) for groups A, B, and C, respectively. At multivariable analysis, the presence MR was associated with LR (p < 0.001) but not with OS nor CCI-DM. UE and the presence of MR at pathology in reexcision specimen are associated to a higher risk of LR but not to a higher risk of DM or lower OS. After macroscopic complete UE, postponing reexcision until a LR occurs may be considered on an individualized basis.

Thoracoabdominal flap reconstruction after resection of superficial soft-tissue sarcomas in the chest wall

The thoracoabdominal flap is a rotation flap, and is well known for reconstruction of defects following resections for breast cancer, but the flap is not well known for reconstructing defects following resections of soft-tissue sarcomas involving the chest wall. Here we present two patients with superficial chest wall sarcomas consisting of a dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in a 42-year-old man and a recurrent myxofibrosarcoma in a 76-year-old man. The tumors were resected with the surrounding tissue. The defect was reconstructed with a thoracoabdominal flap elevated from the ipsilateral thorax (medially-based flap). Neither case developed necrosis of the flap or reduced shoulder range of motion. The chest wall presents few options for a donor vessel. The thoracoabdominal flap has an axial blood supply and does not require a microsurgical procedure. A thoracoabdominal flap is a suitable reconstruction option for a defect after the resection of a superficial soft-tissue sarcoma in the chest wall.

Anthracycline-based and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting for stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma: a retrospective analysis at two reference centers

BackgroundRadically resected early uterine leiomyosarcoma (eULMS) is still marked by a poor prognosis. Adjuvant strategies investigated up to now have not been corroborated by controlled studies. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcome of eULMS patients treated with adjuvant anthracycline-based or gemcitabine-based chemotherapy at two Italian reference centers.MethodsIn this explorative, retrospective, cohort analysis, we included all the consecutive patients with radically resected eULMS treated at two centers between 1997 and 2017.ResultsA total of 109 consecutive patients were included. Sixty-six (60%) received an anthracycline-based regimen, whereas 43 (40%) received a gemcitabine-based regimen. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 41.3 months with anthracycline-based regimens compared to 20.9 months with gemcitabine-based regimens (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.30–0.80; P = 0.004). In the multivariable model, anthracycline-based regimens were independently associated with a better DFS. No difference in terms of overall survival was observed.ConclusionsDFS was not the same by using an anthracycline-based or a gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with radically resected eULMS. The results of our study are in line with recent prospective controlled evidence in limb and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcomas. The role of anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy should still be viewed as a research issue in eULMS.

Prognoses of superficial soft tissue sarcoma: The importance of fascia-tumor relationship on MRI

BackgroundSuperficial soft tissue sarcoma (S-STS) has been reported to have more favorable prognoses than deep-seated STS. However, for some patients, poor prognoses have been observed and there is a need for better prognostication. The deep peripheral fascia lies in the border of the S-STS and can be consistently detected using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The relationship of the subcutaneous tumor with the fascia on MRI scan was reported to be useful in classifying the tumor as benign or malignant; this in turn, may reflect the biological aggressiveness of STS. This study was performed to evaluate the oncologic outcomes and to identify the prognostic factors of S-STS by focusing on the relationship of S-STS with the underlying fascia on MRI. Material and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed data on 253 patients who underwent resection of localized S-STS. Potential factors that might influence the oncologic outcomes were identified. The fascia-tumor relationship on MRI was classified into three groups: no fascial contact group (n = 46), fascial contact group (n = 77), and fascial invasion group (n = 84). ResultsOverall, 39 patients (16.5%) died due to S-STS; the 5- and 10-year survival rates were 82.6 ± 2.9% and 73.2 ± 4.5%, respectively. Fascial invasion detected on MRI scans (OR = 2.190, p = 0.034) and advanced age (OR = 2.408, p = 0.034) were found to be independent factors for worse disease specific survival. The fascia-tumor relationship on MRI scan was not associated with local recurrence of S-STS. ConclusionThe fascia-tumor relationship on MRI scan reflects the biological aggressiveness of S-STS and can serve as a prognostic factor.

Watch and Wait Approach for Re-excision After Unplanned Yet Macroscopically Complete Excision of Extremity and Superficial Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma is Safe and Does Not Affect Metastatic Risk or Amputation Rate.

The benefits of systematic re-excision (RE) after initial unplanned excision (UE) of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of delayed RE versus systematic RE after UE on overall survival (OS), metastatic relapse-free survival (MRFS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and rate of amputation. Patients who underwent complete UE, without metastasis or residual disease, for primary extremity or superficial STS between 2007 and 2013 were analyzed. The amputation rate, LRFS, MRFS, and OS were assessed in cases of systematic RE in sarcoma referral centers (Group A), systematic RE outside of community centers (Group B), or without RE (Group C). Groups A, B, and C included 300 (48.2%), 71 (11.4%), and 251 (40.4%) patients, respectively. Median follow-up was 61months and 5-year OS was 88.4%, 87.3%, and 88% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively (p = 0.22), while 5-year MFRS was 85.4%, 86.2%, and 84.9%, respectively (p = 0.938); RE (p = 0.55) did not influence MRFS. The 5-year LRFS was 83%, 73.5%, and 63.8% in Groups A, B and C, respectively (p = 0.00001). Of the 123 local recurrences observed, 0/28, 1/15, and 5/80 patients in Groups A, B, and C, respectively, required amputation (p = 0.41). Factors influencing LRFS were adjuvant radiotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.21; p = 0.0001], initial R0 resection (HR 0.24, p = 0.0001), and Group A (HR 0.44; p = 0.01). Systematic RE in sarcoma centers offers best local control but does not impact OS. Delayed RE at the time of local relapse, if any, could be an option.

Patterns of care of superficial soft tissue sarcomas: it is not always just a lump.

Superficial soft tissue sarcomas (S-STS) are generally considered low-risk tumors and have an excellent prognosis when treated with appropriate surgery and adjuvant therapy. However, they are often misdiagnosed then mistreated, leading to significant morbidity. This study aims to examine the patterns of care and outcomes of patients with S-STS, comparing those initially managed through sarcoma units versus elsewhere. Patients with S-STS from Prince of Wales Hospital in NSW (1995-2013) and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Victoria (2009-2013) were identified from a national sarcoma database. Baseline variables, treatment and disease outcomes were recorded. Statistical tests performed included univariate and multivariate analyses, chi-square tests, as well as the Kaplan-Meier method for 5-year local recurrence and survival rates. Eighty-nine patients were identified, with 35% initially managed at a sarcoma unit and 65% elsewhere. Patients initially managed at sarcoma units had larger tumors (>5 cm 39% vs 17%; P = 0.036) with a trend to higher grade (61% vs 48%; P = 0.39). Patients that were initially managed outside a sarcoma unit more often underwent open surgical biopsies (P<0.0005), had multiple operations (P<0.0005) and had higher rates of local recurrences (24% vs 6.5%, P = 0.038). They also had lower 5-year local recurrence-free survival rates (P = 0.022), but had higher metastasis-free survival (P = 0.014). On multivariate analysis, only larger STS size and male gender predicted for poorer metastasis-free survival (P = 0.042 and 0.018, respectively). Patients with S-STS initially managed outside specialized sarcoma units undergo more operations, with risk of greater morbidity, and have greater risk of local recurrence.

Subcutaneous leiomyosarcoma of anterior abdominal wall in young girl: Rare case report

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) overall comprises 5%–10% of all soft-tissue sarcoma. Subcutaneous LMS accounts only for 1%–2% of all superficial soft-tissue sarcoma. Usually, subcutaneous LMS occur in lower extremity; however, it may occur anywhere in the body. Its occurrence in the abdominal wall is extremely rare. Here, we report a case of recurrent LMS of anterior abdominal wall in a 25-year-old female.

Superficial Soft-Tissue Sarcomas Rarely Require Advanced Soft-Tissue Reconstruction following Resection.

Objective:Soft-tissue sarcomas are most frequently located deep within myofascial compartments. Superficial soft-tissue sarcomas (S-STS) are relatively less common and may be managed differently than deep sarcomas because generous resection margins are often possible without sacrificing critical structures. We sought to investigate the frequency and types of soft-tissue reconstructive procedures that are required following excision of S-STS.Methods:We reviewed 457 consecutively treated patients with S-STS with a minimum 2-year follow-up from our prospectively maintained database between 1989 and 2009.Results:Mean follow-up was 10.5 years (range, 2–23). Four hundred twenty-one tumors (91%) were excised with negative margins, 38 (8.3%) had microscopically positive margins, and three (0.7%) had grossly positive margins. One patient required an amputation. In 271 (58%) patients, the wounds were closed primarily. In comparison, 93 patients (20%) required a rotation flap, 70 (15%) required a split-thickness skin graft, and 23 (5%) underwent a free tissue transfer (ie, advanced reconstructive procedure). The overall complication rate was 12%, although 43% of patients undergoing free tissue transfer developed complications (P = 0.04). An unplanned excision before referral to our center was a risk factor for local recurrence (P = 0.03) when residual tumor was recovered in the reexcision specimen pathologically.Conclusions:Although concern about the morbidity associated with a free tissue transfer (ie, advanced reconstructive procedure) may potentially limit the adequacy of resection in some patients with S-STS, the results of this study showed that the majority of patients had complete excisions with negative margins and primary closure. Obtaining a negative margin when excising a known or suspected S-STS rarely requires an advanced reconstructive procedure and almost never results in loss of limb.

Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines is Associated with Improved Survival for Patients with Stage 2A and Stages 2B and 3 Extremity and Superficial Trunk Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has instituted treatment guidelines for stage 2A and stages 2B and 3 extremity and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcomas (ETSTS). This study examined adherence to the NCCN guidelines and factors associated with nonadherent treatment and survival outcomes. Patients with stage 2A and stages 2B and 3 ETSTS (n=15,957) were categorized as undergoing adherent or nonadherent treatment based on the 2014 NCCN guidelines. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with nonadherent treatment. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were calculated, and Cox models were used to generate adjusted survival curves and hazard ratios (HRs). The findings showed that 87.2% of the patients with stage 2A disease and 58.3% of the patients with stage 2B or 3 disease received adherent treatment. Community treatment facilities and uninsured or unknown insurance status were associated with nonadherent treatment for both stage groups. Adherent treatment was associated with higher 5-year adjusted OS and DSS for stage 2A and stage 2B or 3 patients. In Cox models, nonadherent treatment was associated with worse survival for both stage 2A disease (HR, 2.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.02-2.63) and stages 2B and 3 disease (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.53-1.73). Increasing age and non-private insurance were associated with poorer outcomes. For stages 2B and 3 disease, treatment at a community center and African American race were associated with worse survival. Adherence to NCCN guidelines is excellent for stage 2A and poor for stages 2B and 3 ETSTS. Adherent treatment was associated with improved survival outcomes, highlighting the importance of adherence to NCCN guidelines.