Superficial Esophageal Cancer Research Articles

The efficacy and safety of snare traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for circumferential superficial esophageal cancer.

This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of snare traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the management of circumferential superficial esophageal cancer. A total of 68 patients who underwent ESD for circumferential superficial esophageal cancer were included in this study. All the patients were divided into two groups based on whether the snare traction was used or not; the snare traction group (S-ESD, group n = 35) and the control group (C-ESD, group n = 33). There was no significant difference in the size of the resected area between the groups [21.98 (18.30, 27.00) cm2 vs 24.00 (15.28, 30.72) cm2, P = 0.976]. The snare traction group had a shorter dissection time [92.00 (74.00, 121.00) min vs 110.00 (92.50, 137.00) min, P = 0.017] and a faster resection speed [0.28 ± 0.13 cm2/min vs 0.22 ± 0.11cm2/min, P = 0.040] compared to the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of hospital stay, cost, en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, curative resection rate, bleeding rate, perforation rate, stricture rate, and recurrence rate (P > 0.05). Snare traction-assisted ESD is a safe and efficient approach for the treatment of circumferential superficial esophageal cancer. Its advantages includes shorter procedure so the anesthesia requirement, clear operative filed view, improved mucosal dissection efficiency, simple, and easily accessible equipment.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal and gastric lesions: A comparison of procedures

ObjectiveEsophageal and gastric lesions are effectively managed with minimally invasive upper endoscopic procedures such as endoscopic mucosa resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), offering patients alternatives to invasive interventions. While ESD is well established in Eastern Asia, its adoption in Denmark for superficial esophageal cancer is recent. This study presents real-world data on the feasibility, safety, and hospitalization duration associated with ESD and EMR for esophageal and gastric lesions. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent ESD or EMR at a specialized center in Denmark from October 2016 to June 2022. Data on treatment, indication, lesion location, hospitalization duration, procedure duration, specimen size, complications, recurrence, and one-year overall survival were collected. Statistical comparisons utilized the Mann–Whitney U test, independent sample median test, and chi-squared test. ResultsThe study included 130 patients (144 procedures): 72 underwent ESD and 58 underwent EMR. Compared with EMR, ESD resulted in greater percentages of en bloc and R0 resections (98.8% vs. 64.1%, p < 0.001; and 83.9% vs. 23.8%, p < 0.001), greater complication rates (28.7% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.001) and longer procedure times (119.5 min vs. 37.0 min, p < 0.001). The ESD procedure time significantly decreased over time (p = 0.01). The local recurrence rates were 14.5% for ESD and 23.8% for EMR (p = 0.767). The one-year overall survival rates were similar between the groups (95.8% vs. 94.8%, p = 0.553). ConclusionBoth ESD and EMR are safe and viable for treating esophageal and gastric lesions. ESD offers advantages but requires more time and skill. These findings support the literature, emphasizing the importance of considering patient-specific factors and surgeon proficiency in selecting the appropriate procedure.

Outcomes of repeated endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma on endoscopic resection scar.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be performed for superficial esophageal cancer. However, performing ESD for superficial esophageal cancer on a previous endoscopic resection scar may be difficult. We compared the outcomes between ESD for superficial esophageal cancers on previous endoscopic resection scar (group A) and that for naïve lesions (group B). The study included outcomes of ESD, cumulative incidence of local failure, and predictors of the occurrence of local failure in ESD patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The outcome variables evaluated were en bloc resection rates, procedure times, adverse events, and overall survival rates. Overall, 220 lesions were extracted (groups A and B: 23 and 197 lesions, respectively). In groups A and B, the complete resection rates were 60.9 and 92.9% (P < 0.001), and the mean procedure times were 79 and 68min (P = 0.15), respectively. The perforation rates in groups A and B were 4.3 and 1% (P = 0.28). The 1-year cumulative local failure rates were 22 and 1% (P < 0.001), respectively. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, superficial esophageal SCC on a previous endoscopic resection scar was a strong predictor of local failure (hazard ratio = 21.95 [3.99-120.80], P < 0.001). The 3-year overall survival rates in groups A and B were 95 and 93% (P = 0.99), respectively. Repeated ESD on scar is an option for treating superficial esophageal SCC with an acceptable rate of adverse events. Because of the low complete resection rate and high local failure compared with conventional ESD, strict endoscopic follow-up is required after repeated esophageal ESD.

Treatment strategy for early-stage esophageal cancer.

Approximately 90% of esophageal cancers in Japan are squamous cell carcinomas, and they are often detected at earlier stages in Japan than in Western countries; superficial esophageal cancer without lymph node or distant metastasis comprises one-third of all esophageal cancers in Japan. Endoscopic resection is a minimally invasive treatment for superficial esophageal cancer; however, the risk of regional lymph node recurrence is negligible when it invades the submucosal layer or lymphovasculature. In such cases, surgical treatment is necessary to control regional lymph node recurrences, although the physical burdens and potential complications cannot be overlooked. Recently, clinical trials in Japan have shown promising clinical outcomes of organ preservation strategies. One strategy is initially performing endoscopic resection for superficial esophageal cancer, assessing the risk of lymph node metastasis based on pathological diagnosis for endoscopically resected specimens, and subsequently considering additional therapy (e.g., observation or prophylactic chemoradiotherapy)-another strategy aimed to cure superficial esophageal cancer through definitive chemoradiotherapy alone. The safety and efficacy of the two strategies have been evaluated in clinical trials, which showed that both organ preservation strategies are comparable to surgery in terms of overall survival. However, challenges include improving the accuracy of pretreatment endoscopic diagnosis and decreasing the local-regional recurrence after chemoradiotherapy. This review provides an overview of the latest standard treatment for early-stage esophageal cancer and its future perspectives.

Comparison of the Prevention of Esophageal Stricture Between Oral Prednisolone Alone and Oral Prednisolone Combined with Nasogastric Tube in Superficial Esophageal Cancer After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Comparison of the Prevention of Esophageal Stricture Between Oral Prednisolone Alone and Oral Prednisolone Combined with Nasogastric Tube in Superficial Esophageal Cancer After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Effect of endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection on postoperative wound bleeding‐related complications in patients with superficial esophageal cancer: A meta‐analysis

AbstractOperative therapy for superficial esophagus carcinoma is the main way to treat the disease. Endoscopic excision of lesions in the esophagus has become an alternative to surgical treatment for patients with esophageal carcinoma. To overcome the disadvantages of endoscope mucosa excision (EMR), an endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique has been developed. Although ESD is one of the most effective methods of endoscopy in patients with digestive tract tumors, there are potential complications after surgery, including hemorrhage in the surgical area and stenosis of the esophagus. The objective of this study was to evaluate EMR versus ESD based on post‐operative hemorrhage and esophagus stenosis. All the related articles were retrieved from the e‐databases. The main results were postoperative perforation, hemorrhage, and stenosis after surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of post‐operative wound hemorrhage (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.36–3.29 p = 0.89). Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in the rate of perforation after surgery (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.17–1.95 p = 0.37). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of esophageal stricture after surgery (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.26–5.15 p = 0.85). This analysis was different from the earlier meta‐analysis because ESD and EMR did not show any notable differences with respect to the incidence of perforation after surgery, the hemorrhage of the wound or the stenosis of the esophagus. These findings must, however, be supported by more high‐quality studies.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer with ulcer scarring using a combination of pocket creation, gel immersion, and red dichromatic imaging.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer with ulcer scarring using a combination of pocket creation, gel immersion, and red dichromatic imaging.

Evaluating the usefulness of considering the size and morphological type of type B2 vessel area based on Japan Esophageal Society classification in estimating tumor invasion depth in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinomas: study protocol for a prospective observational study (Japan BEES study)

BackgroundAccurate evaluation of tumor invasion depth is essential to determine the appropriate treatment strategy for patients with superficial esophageal cancer. The pretreatment tumor depth diagnosis currently relies on the magnifying endoscopic classification established by the Japan Esophageal Society (JES). However, the diagnostic accuracy of tumors involving the muscularis mucosa (MM) or those invading the upper third of the submucosal layer (SM1), which correspond to Type B2 vessels in the JES classification, remains insufficient. Previous retrospective studies have reported improved accuracy by considering additional findings, such as the size and macroscopic type of the Type B2 vessel area, in evaluating tumor invasion depth. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether incorporating the size and/or macroscopic type of the Type B2 vessel area improves the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative tumor invasion depth prediction based on the JES classification.MethodsThis multicenter prospective observational study will include patients diagnosed with MM/SM1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on the Type B2 vessels of the JES classification. The tumor invasion depth will be evaluated using both the standard JES classification (standard-depth evaluation) and the JES classification with additional findings (hypothetical-depth evaluation) for the same set of patients. Data from both endoscopic depth evaluations will be electronically collected and stored in a cloud-based database before endoscopic resection or esophagectomy. This study’s primary endpoint is accuracy, defined as the proportion of cases in which the preoperative depth diagnosis matched the histological depth diagnosis after resection. Outcomes of standard- and hypothetical-depth evaluation will be compared.DiscussionCollecting reliable prospective data on the JES classification, explicitly concerning the B2 vessel category, has the potential to provide valuable insights. Incorporating additional findings into the in-depth evaluation process may guide clinical decision-making and promote evidence-based medicine practices in managing superficial esophageal cancer.Trial registrationThis trial was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry of the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN-CTR) under the identifier UMIN000051145, registered on 23/5/2023.

Clinical outcomes of primary esophagectomy and secondary esophagectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity-score matched analysis.

307 Background: Currently it is unknown whether secondary esophagectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is comparable to primary esophagectomy considering outcomes in patients with T1 esophageal cancer. We compared short- and long- term clinical outcomes between the two groups. Methods: Primary surgery (esophagectomy) was performed in 191 patients between 2003 and 2014, and 62 patients underwent secondary surgery (esophagectomy) after ESD for T1 esophageal cancer between 2007 and 2019. Propensity matching was performed for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), location, pathology, degree of differentiation, tumor size, and invasion depth. Lymph node metastasis (LNM), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and postoperative complications were compared between groups. Results: Sixty-eight patients were included after propensity score matching, LNM, OS, DSS, and RFS were comparable between the two groups. Comparing primary and secondary surgery, the respective LNM rates were 23.5% and 26.5%, 6-year OS 78.0% and 89.7%, P= 0.15; DSS were 80.4% and 96.8%, P= .057; and RFS 80.8% and 89.7%, P= .069. Multivariate analyses revealed no statistically significant differences between among LNM, OS, and RFS rates. Comparing the adverse events between the two groups, more early complications were observed in the primary surgery group than in secondary surgery group (50% vs. 20.6%, P = .021). Conclusions: Secondary surgery did not increase the risk of LNM. The long-term outcomes were comparable. Therefore, attempts to perform upfront ESD for superficial esophageal squamous cell cancers are justified.

Automated artificial intelligence–based phase-recognition system for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video)

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal cancer is a multistep treatment involving several endoscopic processes. Although analyzing each phase separately is worthwhile, it is not realistic in practice because of the need for considerable manpower. To solve this problem, we aimed to establish a state-of-the-art artificial intelligence (AI)-based system, specifically, an automated phase recognition system that can automatically identify each endoscopic phase based on video images. Ninety-four videos of ESD procedures for superficial esophageal cancer were evaluated in this single-center study. A deep neural network-based phase recognition system was developed in an automated manner to recognize each of the endoscopic phases. The system was trained using videos, annotated, and verified by two gastrointestinal endoscopists. The overall accuracy of the AI model for automated phase recognition was 90%, while the average precision, recall, and f-value rates were 91%, 90%, and 90% respectively. Two representative ESD videos predicted by the model indicated the usability of AI in clinical practice. We demonstrated that an AI-based automated phase recognition system for esophageal ESD can be established with high accuracy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on automated recognition of ESD treatment phases. Since this system enabled a detailed analysis of phases, collecting large volumes of data in the future may help identify quality indicators for treatment techniques and uncover unmet medical needs that necessitate the creation of new treatment methods and devices.

Endoscopic management of superficial esophageal cancers in 2024

Endoscopic management of superficial esophageal cancers in 2024

Impact of low pharyngeal/esophageal pressure associated with sarcopenia on postendoscopic submucosal dissection pneumonia in patients with superficial esophageal cancer.

The aging population, including patients with superficial esophageal cancer, encounters critical dysphagia- and postoperative pneumonia-related issues. Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) provides advantages over other modalities, older patients are at higher risk of postoperative pneumonia. Furthermore, the etiologies of pneumonia are complex and include patient- (such as sarcopenia) and treatment- (including ESD) related factors. Therefore, this study evaluated swallowing function in patients with superficial esophageal cancer and identified post-ESD pneumonia-associated factors. Comprehensive swallowing function and sarcopenia were evaluated in patients pre-ESD and 2 months post-ESD using high-resolution manometry and several swallowing studies by multiple experts. The effects of mucosal resection and sarcopenia on swallowing function changes post-ESD, the relationship between preoperative swallowing function and sarcopenia, and the factors influencing postoperative pneumonia were investigated. Twenty patients were included in the study. Patients with preoperative sarcopenia had significantly lower pharyngeal/upper esophageal sphincter and tongue pressures than those without sarcopenia. However, ESD did not worsen pharyngeal or upper esophageal pressure. Post-ESD pneumonia incidence tended to be higher in patients with sarcopenia than in those without sarcopenia. The lower upper esophageal sphincter-integrated relaxation pressure (UES-IRP) was a significant factor in pneumonia development. Furthermore, the receiver operating characteristic curve for UES-IRP in pneumonia yielded an area under the curve of 0.82. Sarcopenia is associated with preoperative dysphagia, which increases post-ESD pneumonia risk. Therefore, postoperative pneumonia incidence is expected to increase with an aging population, making preoperative sarcopenia and swallowing function evaluation crucial.

Novel simulation for dosimetry impact of diaphragm respiratory motion in four-dimensional volumetric modulated arc therapy for esophageal cancer

Background and purposeThe diaphragm respiratory motion (RM) could impact the target dose robustness in the lower esophageal cancer (EC). We aimed to develop a framework evaluating the impact of different RM patterns quantitatively in one patient, by creating virtual four-dimensional computed-tomography (v4DCT) images, which could lead to tailored treatment for the breathing pattern. We validated virtual 4D radiotherapy (v4DRT) along with exploring the acceptability of free-breathing volumetric modulated arc therapy (FB-VMAT). Methods and MaterialsWe assessed 10 patients with superficial EC through their real 4DCT (r4DCT) scans. v4DCT images were derived from the end-inhalation computed tomography (CT) image (reference CT) and the v4DRT dose was accumulated dose over all phases. r4DRT diaphragm shifts were applied with magnitudes derived from r4DCT scans; clinical target volume (CTV) dose of v4DRT was compared with that of r4DRT to validate v4DRT. CTV dosage modifications and planning organ at risk volume (PRV) margins of the spinal cord were examined with the diaphragm movement. The percentage dose differences (ΔDx) were determined between the v4DRT and the dose calculated on the reference CT image. ResultsThe CTV ΔDx between the r4DRT and v4DRT were within 1% in cases with RM ≦ 15 mm. The average ΔD100% and ΔDmean of the CTV ranging from 5 to 15 mm of diaphragm motion was 0.3% to 1.7% and 0.1% to 0.4%, respectively. All CTV index changes were within 3% and ΔD1cc and ΔD2cc of Cord PRV were within 1%. ConclusionWe postulate a novel method for evaluating the CTV robustness, comparable to the conventional r4DCT method under the diaphragm RM ≦ 15 mm permitting an impact of within 3% in FB-VMAT for EC on the CTV dose distribution.

Long-term survival in esophagectomy for early-stage esophageal cancer versus endoscopic resection plus additional chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Esophagectomy is still advised as an additional treatment for patients with superficial esophageal cancer (EC, T1a-T1b) after endoscopic resection (ER). However, esophagectomy often deteriorates the general condition of EC patients. In recent years, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been recognized as a reliable, non-surgical treatment that can improve the prognosis. How to combine ER with adjuvant therapy to bring maximal benefits to patients has become a hot clinical research hot topic. However, the current studies have mostly been conducted retrospectively, in single centers, and with small clinical samples; there have been few prospective and large sample size randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of adjuvant CRT versus esophagectomy in the treatment of early EC, and to provide a reference for clinical research and practice. A comprehensive and extensive literature search was performed via the databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science online and all randomized cohort studies and retrospective cohort studies were collected. The quality of research was evaluated according to Cochrane's quality standards, and statistical analysis was conducted with Stata 13.0 and RevMan 5.3 software and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A total of 9 cohort studies, including 790 patients, were included for meta-analysis. The long term effects of the esophagectomy group were better than those of the CRT after ER group [odds ratio (OR) =6.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.96 to 18.84, P=0.002] in disease-free survival (DFS) [hazard ratio (HR) =0.24, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.85, P=0.03] and overall survival (OS) (HR =1.02, 95% CI: 0.57 to 1.82, P=0.94). Other survival indicators showed no significant difference (P>0.05). The 2 groups showed no significant results in OS. Although we found that CRT may be suitable for patients with high-risk of relapse or unable to tolerate surgery, it cannot totally replace surgical treatment; further randomized trials are required to verify this view.

Efficacy of a novel self-assembling peptide gel for hemostasis in refractory neoplastic bleeding.

Video 1Outline of how self-assembling peptide gel can be used exvivo.

Construction and external validation of a nomogram model for predicting the risk of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter case–control study

Esophageal stricture is a common complication after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions, we intend to investigate the independent risk factors of esophageal stricture after ESD by adding the data of included living habits, established a nomogram model to predict the risk of esophageal stricture, and verified it by external data. The clinical data and living habits of patients with early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions who underwent ESD in the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College and Langzhong People's Hospital from March 2017 to August 2021 were retrospectively collected. The data collected from the two hospitals were used as the development group (n = 256) and the validation group (n = 105), respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine independent risk factors for esophageal stricture after ESD and establish a nomogram model for the development group. The prediction performance of the nomogram model is internally and externally verified by calculating C-Index and plotting the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and calibration curve, respectively. The results showed that Age, drinking water temperature, neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, the extent of esophageal mucosal defect, longitudinal diameter of resected mucosa, and depth of tissue invasion (P < 0.05) were independent risk factors for esophageal stricture after ESD. The C-Index of the development group and validation group was 0.925 and 0.861, respectively. The ROC curve and area under the curve (AUC) of the two groups suggested that the discrimination and prediction performance of the model were good. The two groups of calibration curves are consistent and almost overlap with the ideal calibration curve, indicating that the predicted results of this model are in good agreement with the actual observed results. In conclusion, this nomogram model has a high accuracy for predicting the risk of esophageal stricture after ESD, providing a theoretical basis for reducing or avoiding esophageal stricture and guiding clinical practice.

Staging Accuracy and Lymph Node Involvement in Superficial Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus—a Multicenter Case Series Analysis

AbstractAt an early stage, esophageal cancer can be removed surgically or endoscopically. T1a tumors are removed by endoscopic resection, whereas T1b tumors are preferably surgically removed (esophagectomy) due to possible lymph node involvement. However, the diagnostic tools (endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and CT/PET-CT) used to distinguish between T1a and T1b tumors and to detect malignant lymph nodes are imprecise. This study aimed to review the accuracy of preoperative locoregional staging in superficial esophageal cancer in a Danish setting. This was a retrospective, multicenter study including patients with a cT1 esophageal tumor, both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment were excluded. Results from the preoperative diagnostics tools were compared with the pathology report to determine the diagnostic accuracy. Sixty-eight patients were included, 34 patients underwent esophagectomy, and 34 patients underwent endoscopic resection. The positive predictive value (PPV) of PET-CT (or CT) (when staged as a T1 tumor) was 77% (95%CI: 0.59–0.88), and the PPV of EUS (when staged as a T1a or T1b tumor) was 52% (95%CI: 0.32–0.72) and 60% (95%CI: 0.36–0.82), respectively. Six patients had malignant lymph nodes in the surgical specimen; none of them was identified before surgery. In conclusion, neither CT/PET-CT nor EUS is a precise tool to distinguish mucosal from submucosal esophageal tumors. Furthermore, in superficial malignant lesions, lymph node involvement is rare, but when present, it is rarely detected before surgery. To improve staging accuracy, all patients with cT1 tumors could be referred for a diagnostic endoscopic resection prior to possible other treatments.

Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection using a novel thin therapeutic scope for early esophageal cancer adjacent to chemoradiotherapy-induced stricture.

Metachronous esophageal cancers frequently occur, but endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for lesions that occur adjacent to post-treatment scars are often challenging. Furthermore, in cases involving post-treatment stricture, endoscopic balloon dilation or scar incision may be required before ESD, so synchronous ESD for such lesions are even more challenging. Recently, a novel therapeutic thin endoscope, the EG-840TP (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan), has been developed. This scope has a thinner outer diameter (7.9 mm) and more adequate down angle (160°) than a conventional therapeutic scope ([Fig. 1, ] [Fig. 2]). We report a very successful case of ESD using this scope for a superficial esophageal cancer adjacent to a chemoradiotherapy-induced stricture ([Video 1]).

Factors Related to Difficulty in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal cancer is technically challenging, and research on predictive factors related to the difficulty in the procedure is limited. This study aimed to investigate the factors predicting the difficulty in esophageal ESD. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 303 lesions treated at our institution between April 2005 and June 2021. The following 13 factors were evaluated: sex, age, tumor location, tumor localization, macroscopic type, tumor size, tumor circumference, preoperative diagnosis of histological type, preoperative diagnosis of invasion depth, previous radiotherapy for esophageal cancer, metachronous lesion located close to post-ESD scar, operator’s skill, and use of a clip-and-thread traction method. Difficult esophageal ESD cases were defined as those requiring long procedure time (>120 min). Results: Fifty-one lesions (16.8%) met the defined criterion for difficult cases of esophageal ESD. Logistic regression analysis identified tumor size larger than 30 mm (odds ratio: 9.17, 95% confidence interval: 4.27–19.69, p < 0.001) and tumor circumference more than half that of the esophagus (odds ratio 2.53, 95% confidence interval: 1.15–5.54, p = 0.021) as independent predictive factors related to difficulty in esophageal ESD. Conclusion: Tumor size larger than 30 mm and tumor circumference more than half that of the esophagus can predict difficulty in performing esophageal ESD. This knowledge can provide useful information for developing ESD strategies and selecting a suitable operator on a case-by-case basis to achieve favorable clinical outcomes.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Esophageal Cancer: Current and Future.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely used to treat superficial esophageal cancer. The advantages of esophageal ESD include a high en bloc resection rate and accurate pathological diagnosis. It enables local resection of the primary tumor and accurate identification of the risk factors for lymph node metastasis, including depth, vascular invasion, and types of invasion. Even in cases with clinical T1b-SM cancer, ESD and additional treatment can achieve radical cure, depending on the risk of lymph node metastasis. Esophageal ESD will be increasingly vital in minimally invasive and effective esophageal cancer treatment. This article describes the current status and prospects of esophageal ESD.