When I measure all the interrelationships among vying groups throughout history, my civilization's fouling by occultism is thin indeed, yet its taint aids and abets the worst in us: linguistically, psychologically, cognitively. Intentionally aimed words (rhetoric) are dangerous: False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the soul with evil, said Socrates. Jew and nigger imply an other-thanhuman origin when aimed by antisemite or Klansman; there is little wonder at their victims' reaction: .... if you wrong us, shall we not revenge? Words of ritual, seance and astrological columns intentionally separate one individual from another, insinuating an other-than-human source of truth whose validity cannot be tested; and producing a coercive powerbase for the snakeoil salesman, whether Adolf Hitler or Jim Jones. What human(e) thing have such purveyors ever sold? The psychological danger is obvious too, inasmuch as the requisite of our best psychology demands individual honesty and responsibility. Where is responsibility for that defined as human comprehension; where honesty in that defined as knowledgeable in supernatural influences, agencies or phenomena? I only comprehend the human. I know only the natural. What rationale, then, can I build for Rosemary's Baby, The Exorcist, The Family, The Late Great Planet Earth? After guidance toward the comprehensible and the natural in the classroom, there is simply too lit le time for the necessary objective groundwork concerning the vagaries of Sun signs, pyramid power, graphology, and mood rings. My tests for the acquisition of knowledge are the fulltime cognitive tasks of reason, perception, and intuition. Through which can I investigate the occult? Reason requires validity and reliability. Can I approach Nessie, Sasquatch, Zombie, Satan and Druid (who left no writing) by this route? Can I investigate using the psychological standards of honesty and responsibility? Name for me the rhetoric. Can I use the mental process of perception to explicate The Howling, E. T, Gremlins? I perceive only gooseflesh, Easy Tears, and silliness-entertainment! Intuition perhaps? Well, I have camped in wilderness (haunt of UFO and Sasquatch), yet intuit only bear, deer and neighboring camper ru tling in the underbrush; perhaps Jack-the-Ripper among the latter, but nothing beyond human comprehension, nothing supernatural. Try as I might, I cannot see any creative and involving facets in the occult, yet I see no Satanic or macabre forces either (less the aforementioned murders). I will only involve myself with a highly selective occult, and only as the lightest of entertainments: to Alien, Dracula, Frankenstein gladly give gooseflesh but never gullibility.
Read full abstract