In this article, the authors have identified endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) as a potential risk factor for subsequent development of intra-abdominal cancer. When stratified for computed tomography (CT) vs non-CT surveillance, the cohort undergoing CT surveillance did not have an additional cancer risk, implying that the cancer risk is related to the fluoroscopy exposure from the EVAR procedure itself. Whereas much has been written lately about the short- and long-term risks of radiation exposure, the long-term risk of cancer from a single exposure is thought provoking. In its early days, EVAR was typically offered to higher risk patients not believed to be suitable operative candidates because of concerns about device durability. As durability issues have become less of a concern, EVAR has generally become the standard of care for all anatomically suitable patients regardless of age or risk factors. This paper injects some caution into this approach, particularly in younger, healthier patients with long life expectancy. One could potentially argue about the relevance of statistical vs clinical significance. Because of the large numbers studied, close to 40,000 patients, the cancer difference was statistically significant; however, the hazard ratio was only 1.14 for development of abdominal cancer and 1.11 for any cancer, and absolute differences between the groups were small, but for an outcome as potentially severe as cancer, even small differences need to be taken seriously. I doubt the numbers will be startling enough to significantly change practice patterns. However, efforts to minimize radiation exposure during EVAR need to be continuously emphasized and improved. Because of the nature of the administrative database, the authors are not able to quantify the amount of radiation received during EVAR; however, given the stochastic nature of radiation-induced malignant neoplasms, it is reasonable to assume that there is no safe dose and that every effort to minimize radiation exposure should be employed. This is increasingly relevant as EVAR becomes more complicated and potentially time-consuming with the expansion of fenestrated and branched EVAR. The authors mention some measures, such as C-arm angulation, frame rate, table position, and use of protective materials. Other important adjuncts include expanded use of intravascular ultrasound, two-dimensional and three-dimensional fusion imaging, and use of newer imaging systems with radiation-reducing software packages.1Hertault A. Maurel B. Midulla M. Bordier C. Desponds L. Saeed Kilani M. et al.Minimizing radiation exposure during endovascular procedures: basic knowledge, literature review, and reporting standards.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015; 50: 21-36Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar, 2Mohapatra A. Greenburg R.K. Mastracci T.M. Eagleton M.J. Thornsberry B. Radiation exposure to operating room personnel and patients during endovascular procedures.J Vasc Surg. 2013; 58: 702-709Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (78) Google Scholar Whereas this article focuses on the patient risk, risks to the operating surgeons and other operating room personnel cannot be ignored. Radiation risk, both deterministic and stochastic, should also be a standard part of the informed consent process. Anecdotally, I have noted that our younger trainees are often the most aggressive in terms of using protective radiation shielding during procedures. This is encouraging and clearly should become endemic practice in our profession. The opinions or views expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or recommendations of the Journal of Vascular Surgery or the Society for Vascular Surgery. A population-based cohort study examining the risk of abdominal cancer after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repairJournal of Vascular SurgeryVol. 69Issue 6PreviewEndovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has increasingly been used as the primary treatment approach for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). This study examined the hypothesis that EVAR leads to an increased risk of abdominal cancer within the radiation field compared with open AAA repair. Full-Text PDF Open Archive