Successful Biliary Drainage Research Articles

Comparison of antimicrobial therapy termination in febrile and afebrile patients with acute cholangitis after drainage

The standard treatment duration for acute cholangitis (AC) involves a 4–7-day antimicrobial treatment post-biliary drainage; however, recent studies have suggested that a ≤ 2–3 days is sufficient. However, clinical practice frequently depends on body temperature as a criterion for discontinuing antimicrobial treatment. Therefore, in this study, we assessed whether patients with AC can achieve successful outcomes with a ≤ 7-day antimicrobial treatment, even with a fever, assuming the infection source is effectively controlled. We conducted a single-center retrospective study involving patients with AC, defined following the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 for any cause, who underwent successful biliary drainage and completed a ≤ 7-day antimicrobial treatment. Patients were categorized into the febrile and afebrile groups based on their body temperature within 24 h before completing antimicrobial treatment. The primary outcome was the clinical cure rate, defined as no initial presenting symptoms by day 14 post-biliary drainage without recurrence or death by day 30. The secondary outcome was a 3-month recurrence rate. Logistic regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used. Overall, 408 patients were selected, among whom 40 (9.8%) were febrile. The two groups showed no significant differences in the clinical cure and 3-month recurrence rates. Notably, the subgroups limited to patients with a ≤ 3-day antibiotic treatment duration also showed no differences in these outcomes. Therefore, our results suggest that discontinuing antibiotics within the initially planned treatment period was sufficient for successful drainage cases of AC, regardless of the patient's fever status during the 24 h leading up to termination.

DEB-TACE versus cTACE for unresectable HCC with B1-type bile duct invasion after successful biliary drainage: A propensity score matching analysis.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Given the lack of specific recommendations for conventional TACE (cTACE) and drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) in patients having unresectable HCC with tumor infiltrating the common hepatic duct or the first-order branch of the bile ducts (B1-type bile duct invasion; B1-BDI) after biliary drainage, we retrospectively compared the safety and efficacy of DEB-TACE with cTACE in this patient population. Using data from five tertiary medical centers (January 2017-December 2021), we compared complications, overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and tumor response rate between patients having unresectable HCC with B1-BDI who underwent DEB-TACE or cTACE after successful biliary drainage. X-tile software calculated the pre-TACE total bilirubin (TBil) cutoff value, indicating optimal timing for sequential TACE after drainage. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. The study included 108 patients with unresectable HCC (B1-BDI) who underwent DEB-TACE and 114 who received cTACE as initial treatment. After PSM (n = 53 for each group), the DEB-TACE group had a longer TTP (8.9 vs. 6.7 months, p = 0.038) and higher objective response rate (64.2% vs. 39.6%, p = 0.011) than did the cTACE group, although OS was comparable (16.7 vs. 15.3 months, p = 0.115). The DEB-TACE group exhibited fewer post-procedural increments in the mean albumin-bilirubin score, TBil, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), along with a significantly lower incidence of serious adverse events within 30 days (hepatic failure, ALT increase, and TBil increase) than the cTACE group (all p < 0.05). The pre-TACE TBil cutoff value was 99 μmol/L; patients with higher values (>99 μmol/L) had poorer OS in both groups (p < 0.05). DEB-TACE is safe and effective after successful biliary drainage in unresectable HCC with B1-BDI, potentially better than cTACE in terms of liver toxicity, TTP, and ORR. Lowering TBil below 99 μmol/L through successful drainage may create ideal conditions for sequential TACE.

A therapeutic ERCP in an only 5.9 kg infant with obstruction jaundice using JF-260V duodenoscope

BackgroundEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has found extensive use in pediatric patients; however, challenges persist in the application of therapeutic ERCP in infants.Case presentationThis case report details the presentation of a 5.9-kilogram infant with obstructive jaundice and suspected hemolytic anemia who underwent ERCP to alleviate biliary obstruction. The infant was admitted due to clay-colored stools, jaundice, and liver injury. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) revealed dilation of the common bile duct (CBD) accompanied by the presence of stones. ERCP was conducted using a JF-260V duodenoscope under general anesthesia. Successful stone extraction and biliary drainage were achieved.ConclusionsIn centers with considerable expertise in ERCP and pediatric anesthesia, the use of a conventional adult duodenoscope for therapeutic ERCP in infants can be considered safe and feasible, provided careful and stringent patient selection criteria are applied. In the future, clear guidelines and standardized protocols for the indications and procedures of pediatric ERCP should be established.

Efficacy of Short-Course Antibiotic Therapy for Acute Cholangitis With Positive Blood Cultures: A Retrospective Study.

Short-term treatment of acute cholangitis is sufficient for cure compared with the standard treatment duration. Whether this short-course antimicrobial therapy is effective in patients with acute cholangitis with positive blood cultures has not been fully investigated. This study assessed whether patients with acute cholangitis could achieve successful outcomes with a three-day or shorter antimicrobial treatment period, even with a positive blood culture. This single-center retrospective study involved patients with acute cholangitis, defined according to the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 for any cause, who underwent successful biliary drainage and completed a seven-day or shorter antimicrobial treatment. Patients were categorized into six groups based on the duration of antibiotic use (short or standard) after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and blood culture findings (positive, negative, or no collection). The primary outcome was the clinical cure rate, defined as no initial presenting symptoms by day 14 after biliary drainage and no recurrence or death by day 30. Secondary outcomes included a three-month recurrence rate and length of hospital stay. In total, 389 cases were selected, and 27 patients (6.9%) undergoing short-course therapy tested positive for blood culture. The clinical cure rate (n=25, 92.6%) in this group was comparable to that in the other groups. For the three-month recurrence rate (n=1, 3.7%) and median hospital stay (six days), this group's outcomes were either better or similar to those of the other groups. For cases of successful drainage in acute cholangitis, even with positive blood cultures, short-term antibiotic therapy may be appropriate.

Successful Correction of the Misdiagnosis of a Primary Liver Neuroendocrine Tumour with a Combination of Immunohistochemical and Radiological Assessments: Report of a Rare Case from Pakistan

Human neuroendocrine tumours arise in different organs including most frequently in the gall bladder, kidneys, and ovaries or testicles. Liver neuroendocrine tumours are rarer types that grow slowly and arise from neuroendocrine cells. A 50-year-old woman with a history of type 1 diabetes mellitus and hypertension presented with severe abdominal pain, fever, pallor and jaundice over two days. She had not history of cancer. Initially, she was treated medically with Ciproxin, Entamizole, Zentel, and Nospa, but her symptoms were not resolved, and she was referred for gastroduodenal endoscopy, radiological and blood tests. The gastroduodenal endoscopic evaluation revealed severe gastritis with mild erythema in the corpus and antrum of the stomach with no evidence of esophagitis or duodenitis. At the time of initial diagnosis, the patient was asymptomatic for a liver neuroendocrine tumour as she did not have anemia, weight loss, abdominal distension, severe abdominal pain, or a palpable right upper quadrant mass. The radiological investigations, abdominal and pelvic ultrasound and computed tomography scan, detected hepatomegaly with a mass of an internal necrotic area in left lobe and smaller lesions in the right lobe. Liver core biopsies taken from the left lobe contained hepatocellular carcinoma. After a hepatectomy of the left lobe, the patient was stable and managed with intravenous fluid, analgesics, antibiotics, and antiemetic drugs and was discharged. Hepatocellular carcinoma was diagnosed in the resection specimen. The resected tumour tissue was analysed through immunohistochemistry for presence of Sheppard, arginase, Cam5.2 and CDX-2, heppar, arginase, PAX8, Albumin ISH, CK7, CK20 and INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranin, Ki67, Synaptophysin, Cytokeratin AE1/AE3, synaptophysin, CD56, and Glypican-3. Consequently, liver neuroendocrine cancer was diagnosed. The patient was treated with Sandostatin for 7 days to treat the neuroendocrine tumour. Following a left hepatectomy, post-surgery endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) showed normal ampullary mucosa and successful surgical biliary drainage was observed for almost 45 days with bile drain effluent between 20-230 ml. In this case, the differentiation of this liver neuroendocrine tumour from hepatocellular carcinoma, hyper vascular hepatic lesions based upon detection of chromogranin, CK7, CK20, HepPar1, Ki67 allowed appropriate clinical management of the patient. During radiological analysis, it was confirmed that the liver mass was not metastasized from the primary tumour of the stomach or colon.

Antimicrobial therapy outcomes in acute cholangitis: Hilar multiple obstructions versus single hilar and common bile duct obstructions.

The appropriate duration of antimicrobial therapy for acute cholangitis (AC) arising from multiple hilar biliary obstructions as opposed to simple obstruction in the extrahepatic bile duct has not been established. This study assessed the efficacy of the duration of antimicrobial treatments in the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 for AC based on the cause and site of obstruction. This single-center retrospective study involved patients with AC who underwent successful biliary drainage and completed a 7-day or shorter antimicrobial treatment. Patients were categorized into three groups: Group 1, bile duct stone or benign obstruction; Group 2, simple biliary obstruction due to malignancy; and Group 3, multiple hilar biliary obstruction due to malignancy. The primary outcome was clinical cure rate, and the secondary outcomes were 3-month recurrence rate and length of hospital stay. A total of 373 patients were selected. Patients in Group 3 were younger or had Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥4, and had fewer positive blood cultures. In Group 3, the clinical cure rate (87.1%) and 3-month recurrence rate (32.3%) were less favorable than those in the other groups. In Group 1, the clinical cure rate was significantly higher (98.1%, P = 0.02) with a much lower 3-month recurrence rate of only 3.4% (P < 0.001) than that in the other groups. The median hospital stay for all groups was 7 days. This study suggests that the outcomes in Group 3 may be worse than those in Groups 1 or 2, regardless of the duration of the antibiotic treatment.

Association of short-course antimicrobial therapy and bacterial resistance in acute cholangitis: Retrospective cohort study.

Background and study aims Although the number of resistant bacteria tends to increase with prolonged antimicrobial therapy, no studies have examined the relationship between the duration of antimicrobial therapy and increase in the number of resistant bacteria in acute cholangitis. We hypothesized that the short-term administration of antimicrobial agents in acute cholangitis would suppress bacterial resistance. Patients and methods This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study of patients with acute cholangitis admitted between January 2018 and June 2020 who met the following criteria: successful biliary drainage, positive blood or bile cultures, bacteria identified from cultures sensitive to antimicrobials, and subsequent cholangitis recurrence by January 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: those whose causative organisms at the time of recurrence became resistant to the antimicrobial agents used at the time of initial admission (resistant group) and those who remained susceptible (susceptible group). Multivariate analysis was used to examine risk factors associated with the development of resistant pathogens. Multivariate analysis investigated antibiotics used with the length of 3 days or shorter after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and previously reported risk factors for the development of bacterial resistance. Results In total, 89 eligible patients were included in this study. There were no significant differences in patient background or ERCP findings between the groups. The use of antibiotics, completed within 3 days after ERCP, was associated with a lower risk of developing bacterial resistance (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.65; P =0.01). Conclusions In acute cholangitis, the administration of antimicrobials within 3 days of ERCP may suppress the development of resistant bacteria.

Endoscopic Biliary Drainage in Surgically Altered Anatomy.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is considered the preferred method for managing biliary obstructions. However, the prevalence of surgically modified anatomies often poses challenges, making the standard side-viewing duodenoscope unable to reach the papilla in most cases. The increasing instances of surgically altered anatomies (SAAs) result from higher rates of bariatric procedures and surgical interventions for pancreatic malignancies. Conventional ERCP with a side-viewing endoscope remains effective when there is continuity between the stomach and duodenum. Nonetheless, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) or surgery has historically been used as an alternative for biliary drainage in malignant or benign conditions. The evolving landscape has seen various endoscopic approaches tailored to anatomical variations. Innovative methodologies such as cap-assisted forward-viewing endoscopy and enteroscopy have enabled the performance of ERCP. Despite their utilization, procedural complexities, prolonged durations, and accessibility challenges have emerged. As a result, there is a growing interest in novel enteroscopy and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) techniques to ensure the overall success of endoscopic biliary drainage. Notably, EUS has revolutionized this domain, particularly through several techniques detailed in the review. The rendezvous approach has been pivotal in this field. The antegrade approach, involving biliary tree puncturing, allows for the validation and treatment of strictures in an antegrade fashion. The EUS-transmural approach involves connecting a tract of the biliary system with the GI tract lumen. Moreover, the EUS-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) procedure, combining EUS and ERCP, presents a promising solution after gastric bypass. These advancements hold promise for expanding the horizons of comprehensive and successful biliary drainage interventions, laying the groundwork for further advancements in endoscopic procedures.

Efficacy of a novel integrated biliary stent and nasobiliary catheter system for accidental tube deviation in biliary drainage.

Background and study aims Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage is accompanied by a risk of accidental removal of the nasobiliary drainage (NBD) tube, especially through self-removal in elderly patients. We studied the usefulness of an integrated biliary stent and nasobiliary catheter system (UMIDAS NB stent) for biliary drainage in case of accidental NBD tube removal. Patients and methods From April to November 2022, we placed a UMIDAS NB stent in 30 patients with acute cholangitis or obstructive jaundice. We evaluated the plastic stent (PS) position at the time of accidental stent removal and before the planned endoscopic procedure. In addition, we studied the ratio of successful biliary drainage and complications based on the usage of UMIDAS. Results All 11 patients with accidental stent removal exhibited correct PS position in X-ray fluoroscopy. Of the 19 patients with planned NBD tube removal, three had complete PS migration into the common bile duct and three had incomplete migration (the duodenal side flap entered the bile duct). In summary, 80% (24/30) of PS were in the correct position, and all patients had successful biliary drainage and no complications. Conclusions The UMIDAS NB stent might be useful for biliary drainage in patients with a high risk of NBD tube self-removal.

Biliary intervention combined with lenvatinib+ PD-1 inhibitor of Klatskin tumor complicated with malignant obstructive jaundice.

e14620 Background: Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor) is a rare and highly aggressive cancer that occurs at or near the junction of the right and left hepatic ducts. Gemcitabine + cisplatin has been established as an effective first-line treatment. However, this malignancy is commonly complicated by malignant biliary obstruction which may gradually damage patients’ liver function and may limit the chemotherapy. In addition, Cumulative clinical evidence showed that tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with immunotherapy is represented as a promising alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of biliary intervention combined with the Lenvatinib+PD-1 inhibitor (Tislelizumab/Sintilimab) for the Klatskin tumor. Methods: From January 2020 to December 2022, 21 Klatskin tumor patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) were included. All included patients received biliary decompression by metal stent + Iodine-125 seed strand (ISS) implantation. The number of 125I seeds to be implanted was determined according to the plan of the preoperative computerized treatment planning system (TPS). The procedure-related outcomes were evaluated regarding successful drainage and complications. In addition, the survival of patients who received successful biliary drainage and patients who received sequential systemic anticancer treatment were analyzed. Successful biliary drainage was defined as the serum total bilirubin level dropped by 75% of the preoperative value within 4 weeks. Major complications referred to those that result in death or serious adverse effects including sepsis, uncontrollable biliary or intestinal bleeding, and acute renal failure. The time between stent insertion and death was defined as patient survival. Results: 71.4% achieved successful drainage, significant improvements were observed from before to one month after the procedure in liver function values, including total bilirubin (TBIL), and direct bilirubin (DBIL) (all P&lt;0.001). Minor complications occurred in 5 patients (23.8%) in all patients, including 1 patient (4.8%) who experienced cholangitis, and 4 patients (19%) who suffered abdominal pain. No major procedure-related complication was observed. The median overall survival(mOS) of 21 patients was 6.1 months. Patients who received successful biliary drainage (n=15) had longer mOS than those who received unsuccessful biliary drainage(n=6) [7.4 months vs. 3.5 months, respectively, P&lt;0.001]. Patients who received sequential Lenvatinib+ Pembrolizumab after effective drainage(n=9) had longer mOS than those who only received palliative therapy(n=6) [7.4 months vs. 5.2 months, respectively, P=0.028]. Conclusions: Biliary intervention + ISS combined with the following Lenvatinib+ PD-1 inhibitor is safe and feasible for cholangiocarcinoma patients complicated with obstructive jaundice.

Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes between cap-fitted forward and side viewing endoscopes in patients with Billroth II anastomosis

BackgroundThere have been no previous studies that directly compared outcomes between cap-fitted forward-viewing and side viewing endoscopes (SE). This study aimed to compare the technical success rate and occurrence of adverse events between the side viewing and cap-fitted forward-viewing endoscope (CE) groups among patients with Billroth II anatomy who underwent ERCP.MethodsThe medical records of patients with a previous history of subtotal gastrectomy using Billroth II reconstruction who underwent ERCP at Yeungnam University Hospital between January 2004 and December 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into CE and SE group. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to minimize selection bias.ResultsPropensity score matching resulted in 55 matched pairs for further analysis. Patients’ characteristics were comparable in the matched cohorts. Final success rate of selective bile duct cannulation was not significantly different between the SE and CE groups (98.2% vs. 94.5%, p = 0.308). The complete CBD stone removal rate in CBD stone and successful biliary drainage rate in malignant biliary obstruction were not significantly different between the two groups. The rate of total ERCP-related adverse events was higher in the CE group than in the SE group, but the difference was not statistically significant (10.9% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.507). Among adverse events, the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis showed higher tendency in the CE group than in the SE group (10.9% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.297).ConclusionIn conclusion, CE seems to be equally effective as SE for ERCP in patients with Billroth II anatomy. However, attention should be paid to development of post ERCP complications, especially pancreatitis, when performed by CE.

Optimal Timing of Cholecystectomy for Patients with Concurrent Acute Cholecystitis and Acute Cholangitis after Successful Biliary Drainage by Interventional Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Background: Concurrent acute cholecystitis and acute cholangitis is a unique clinical situation. We tried to investigate the optimal timing of cholecystectomy after adequate biliary drainage under this condition. Methods: From January 2012 to November 2017, we retrospectively screened all in-hospitalized patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and then identified patients with concurrent acute cholecystitis and acute cholangitis from the cohort. The selected patients were stratified into two groups: one-stage intervention (OSI) group (intended laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the same hospitalization) vs. two-stage intervention (TSI) group (interval intended laparoscopic cholecystectomy). Interrogated outcomes included recurrent biliary events, length of hospitalization, and surgical outcomes. Results: There were 147 patients ultimately enrolled for analysis (OSI vs. TSI, 96 vs. 51). Regarding surgical outcomes, there was no significant difference between the OSI group and TSI group, including intraoperative blood transfusion (1.0% vs. 2.0%, p = 1.000), conversion to open procedure (3.1% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.236), postoperative complication (6.3% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.342), operation time (118.0 min vs. 125.8 min, p = 0.869), and postoperative days until discharge (3.37 days vs. 4.02 days, p = 0.643). In the RBE analysis, the OSI group presented a significantly lower incidence of overall RBE (5.2% vs. 41.2%, p &lt; 0.001) than the TSI group. Conclusions: Patients with an initial diagnosis of concurrent acute cholecystitis and cholangitis undergoing cholecystectomy after ERCP drainage during the same hospitalization period may receive some benefit in terms of clinical outcomes.

Customized Postoperative Therapy Improves Bile Drainage in Biliary Atresia: A Single Center Preliminary Report

BackgroundControversies in management of biliary atresia (BA) after hepatoportoenterostomy (HPE) lead to variable treatment protocols. We implemented standardized medical management after HPE, customizing the use of antibiotics and corticosteroids based on patient-specific factors. MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, 20 consecutive infants underwent HPE for BA and were compared to a historical cohort. Analysis of successful biliary drainage 3 months after HPE (defined as serum total bilirubin <2 mg/dL) was the primary endpoint; survival with native liver at 2 years was the secondary endpoint. ResultsSixteen of 20 (80%) infants had successful bile drainage, compared to 8 of 20 (40%) infants in the historical cohort (P = 0.0225). Sixteen of 20 patients in the new protocol have reached 2 years of age or required liver transplantation. Among the sixteen, 11 (68.8%) are alive with native livers versus 10 of 20 (50%) in the historical cohort (P = 0.0970). ConclusionThis preliminary report suggests the potential benefit of tailored use of postoperative antibiotics and corticosteroids in improving biliary drainage after HPE. Level of evidenceIII.

Effect of Biliary Tract Invasion with Obstructive Jaundice on the Prognosis of Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Biliary tract invasion (BTI) is associated with poor outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the presence of a BTI is a neglected variable for staging in the current guidelines. This study aimed to explore the effects of BTI with obstructive jaundice on the prognosis of patients with unresectable HCC. We retrospectively included 205 patients initially diagnosed with unresectable HCC who presented with obstructive jaundice due to BTI between January 2010 and June 2021. BTI was classified into four types according to the location of the biliary obstruction. Both clinical and treatment factors that affect median overall survival (mOS) were analyzed. The mOS of patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages B, C, and D was 9.2 months, 3.4 months, and 1.8 months, respectively (p<.001). The mOS of BTI type I patients was superior to that of BTI type II patients (7.1 months vs. 3.2 months, p=.002). Patients who underwent successful biliary drainage had a longer mOS than those who underwent unsuccessful biliary drainage (10.4 months vs. 2.9 months, p<.001). In the multivariate analysis, BTI type I (p=.009), successful biliary drainage (p=.005), and HCC treatment (p<.001) were significant favorable prognostic factors that affected patient survival. HCC patients with BTI type II may have a poorer prognosis than those with BTI type I. Effective biliary drainage and anti-cancer treatment may provide survival benefits to these patients. A more detailed staging system for HCC based on the state of BTI is needed.

Clinical Outcomes of Biliary Drainage in Patients with Malignant Biliary Obstruction Caused by Colorectal Cancer Metastases

Background and aimMalignant biliary obstruction is an ominous complication of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that is challenging to solve. Biliary drainage can be performed to relieve symptoms of jaundice, treat cholangitis, or enable palliative systemic therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes of biliary drainage of malignant biliary obstruction in mCRC patients.MethodsConsecutive patients with malignant biliary obstruction due to mCRC who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography were included. Patient, disease, and procedural characteristics and outcomes were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records. Radiological data were prospectively reassessed. Main outcome was functional success, i.e. achievement of the intended goal of biliary drainage. Prognostic factors for functional success and survival were assessed.ResultsThirty-seven patients were included. Functional success was achieved in 18 (50%) patients. Seventeen (46%) patients experienced adverse events (suspected to be) related to the procedure. Median overall survival after biliary drainage was 61 days (IQR 31–113). No prognostic factors of functional success were identified. Performance status, presence of the primary tumor, ascites, ≥ 5 intrahepatic metastases, estimated hepatic invasion of > 50% and above-median levels of bilirubin and lactate dehydrogenase were significantly associated with poorer survival. Improved survival was seen in patients with technical, functional, or biochemical success, and with subsequent oncologic treatment.ConclusionsFunctional successful biliary drainage was achieved in half of the patients. Adverse events also occurred in nearly half of the patients. We observed a significantly longer survival in whom biliary drainage allowed palliative oncologic therapy.

Successful biliary drainage in a patient with a giant hiatal hernia and pancreatic prolapse using the percutaneous-endoscopic rendezvous technique.

Successful biliary drainage in a patient with a giant hiatal hernia and pancreatic prolapse using the percutaneous-endoscopic rendezvous technique.

Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Intervention in Adult Biliary Atresia Patients After Kasai Portoenterostomy.

Kasai portoenterostomy (KP) is a standard treatment for patients with biliary atresia (BA). After KP, patients with BA occasionally develop biliary complications, such as recurrent cholangitis, biliary stricture, and cystic dilatation of the intrahepatic bile duct. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage is one of the treatment options for these biliary complications. However, limited information is available on percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage performed after KP in adult BA patients with native livers. Herein, we describe 8 cases of percutaneous transhepatic biliary interventions performed after KP in 7 adult BA patients with native livers. Cholangiography showed multiple cystic dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts. Advancing a guidewire and catheter was difficult due to the multiple dilatations and strictures of the bile duct. Successful biliary drainage tube placement and clinical improvement was achieved in 5 and 3 cases, respectively. Because of its technical difficulty and limited clinical effectiveness, it is not recommended that it be performed easily.

Safety and efficacy of different techniques in difficult biliary cannulation at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

ABSTRACT Background Adverse events (AEs) are commonly seen at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during difficult biliary cannulation (DBC). Therefore, attaining the right technique is essential to have improved outcomes. Methods Patients who had DBC over a 3-year period were assessed for outcomes. The protocol included double guidewire (DGW) technique, wire-guided cannulation (WGC) after pancreatic stent, precut sphincterotomy/fistulotomy, and EUS-guided rendezvous (RV). The success of various techniques and AE was studied. Results As per available case analysis, a total of 3680 patient details were assessed out of which DBC was noted in 471 (12.8%) patients with a mean (SD) age of 51.5 (17.4) years; majority being 330 (70.1%) males. Most patients underwent precut sphincterotomy 230 (48.8%); however, it was not successful in the first attempt in 10 (2.1%) patients with the success rate of 220 (95.6%). The success rate of DGW cannulation was 120 (95.2%), WGC after pancreatic stent was 64 (94.1%), EUS-RV was 34 (97.1%), and wire-guided repeat ERCP after 48 h was 10 (98.3%). AEs were noted in 52 (11.1%) patients. After precut, 32 (13.9%) patients developed AE out of which post-ERCP pancreatitis was noted in 20 (8.7%). Twenty-three patients had failed biliary access after all methods and 20 (86.9%) of those received successful percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Conclusion Repeat ERCP after 48 h and EUS-RV appear prudent for DBC. Precut remains one of the preferred choices for most endoscopists when there is no entrance to PD. Further utilizing an algorithmic approach can contribute to higher success rates without compromising safety.

Troubleshooting Difficult Bile Duct Access: Advanced ERCP Cannulation Techniques, Percutaneous Biliary Drainage, or EUS-Guided Rendezvous Technique?

Despite experienced hands and availability of various well-designed catheters and wires, selective bile duct cannulation may still fail in 10–20% of cases during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In case standard ERCP cannulation technique fails, salvage options include advanced ERCP cannulation techniques such as double-guidewire technique (DGW) with or without pancreatic stenting and precut papillotomy, percutaneous biliary drainage (PBD), and endoscopic ultrasound-guided Rendezvous (EUS-RV) ERCP. If the pancreatic duct is inadvertently entered during cannulation attempts, DGW technique is a reasonable next step, which can be followed by pancreatic stenting to reduce risks of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Studies suggest that early precut papillotomy is not associated with a higher risk of PEP, while needle-knife fistulotomy is the preferred method. For patients with critical clinical condition who may not be fit for endoscopy, surgically altered anatomy in which endoscopic biliary drainage is not feasible, and non-communicating multisegmental biliary obstruction, PBD has a unique role to provide successful biliary drainage efficiently in this particular population. As endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage techniques advance, EUS-RV ERCP has been increasingly employed to guide bile duct access and cannulation with satisfactory clinical outcomes and is especially valuable for benign pathology at centres where expertise is available. Endoscopists should become familiar with each technique’s advantages and limitations before deciding the most appropriate treatment that is tailored to patient’s anatomy and clinical needs.

Antegrade Therapy for Management of Choledocholithiasis through Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy in a Patient with Surgically Altered Gastrointestinal Anatomy

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HG) is a technique used to access the biliary tree in patients with surgically altered anatomy. Additionally, development of EUS-HG fistula permits intraductal therapy, thereby preventing patients from requiring surgery or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), thus decreasing morbidity. This clinical vignette describes an 83-year-old man with a history of gangrenous cholecystitis requiring cholecystectomy, partial gastrectomy, and Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy who presented to an outside hospital with abdominal pain and fever and found to have cholangitis and choledocholithiasis. He underwent two endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures at an outside hospital which were unsuccessful due to an inaccessible major papilla in the setting of the patient's surgically altered anatomy. On arrival to Wake Forest, the patient underwent EUS-HG with successful biliary drainage and resolution of cholangitis. He returned for ERCP three months later with balloon sphincteroplasty, cholangioscopy, and electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) performed through the existing metal stent (hepaticogastrostomy), resulting in stone fragmentation and antegrade removal with balloon sweeps. Repeat cholangioscopy post-EHL and balloon sweeps showed complete duct clearance with no residual stones. The hepaticogastrostomy stent was subsequently removed, and the patient recovered without any complications.