Aortic Valve Replacement Repair Research Articles

Aortic Regurgitation: From Valvular to Myocardial Dysfunction.

Chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) leads to volume overload in the left ventricle (LV), which is well tolerated for years. In this condition, the LV usually dilates with minimal reduction in the ejection fraction (EF), even in the absence of symptoms. Echocardiography is the primary imaging test used to quantify AR. However, no single assessment of Doppler measures is accurate and precise in individual patients; therefore, the integration of multiple parameters is necessary. Recent guidelines recommend surgical treatment for severe AR in patients who are symptomatic or have an LVEF < 55% and an end-systolic diameter > 50 mm. Nevertheless, advances in imaging technology have improved the quantification of AR and the assessment of LV subclinical dysfunction. It is widely recognized that patients who undergo aortic valve replacement/repair (AVR) due to symptoms or a low LVEF experience worse outcomes than those undergoing AVR for non-Class I indications. In fact, subclinical irreversible myocardial damage may occur in clinically well-compensated and closely monitored patients while awaiting formal surgical indications. This condition could be prevented by the use of multimodal imaging parameters, in particular longitudinal LV strain and magnetic resonance imaging. In addition, better cut-off values for mortality predictors should be established. This review aims to identify simple models that integrate several echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance-derived parameters to predict the optimal timing of surgical treatment in asymptomatic patients with chronic severe AR.

Novel Expansible Aortic Annuloplasty Ring Exhibits Similar Characteristics as the Dacron Ring-an In Vitro Evaluation.

An increasing body of research indicates that annular stability plays a key role for a successful aortic valve repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare a novel open aortic annuloplasty ring (the A-ring) with the Dacron ring. Both rings were compared with native aortic roots in vitro. Eighteen aortic roots were included in the study and randomized into three groups: the native, Dacron, and A-ring group. The roots were evaluated in an in vitro physiologic pulsatile model simulating the left side of the heart. Aortic annulus diameters were significantly reduced both in the Dacron ring group (p = 0.003) and the A-ring group (p = 0.020) when compared with the native group. Both the Dacron ring and A-ring effectively downsized the aortic annulus diameter. The A-ring also displayed an ability to maintain aortic root distensibility during the cardiac cycle equally to the Dacron ring.

Aortic valve repair using geometric ring annuloplasty in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients

ObjectiveExisting replacement options for the aortic valve have significant drawbacks, especially in children. A geometric annuloplasty ring can help to achieve consistently successful aortic valve repair, but only limited experience with use of this device has been reported in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients. MethodsAll pediatric and adult congenital patients at our institution who underwent aortic valve repair with placement of a geometric annuloplasty ring were reviewed. The study period spanned from July 2018 to April 2022. Hemodynamic outcomes were evaluated using transthoracic echocardiography. ResultsThe study included 36 subjects. The median age was 17.4 years (range, 8-30 years). Twenty-one subjects were younger than age 18 years. The most common primary diagnoses were neoaortic valve insufficiency or neoaortic root dilation, and congenital aortic stenosis with bicuspid or functionally unicuspid aortic valve. Of the 34 subjects with procedural success, 31 (91%) had use of additional valve repair techniques and 26 (76%) had an additional concomitant procedure performed. Operative mortality was 0% (0/33), and major complication rate was 6% (2/33). The median follow-up time was 1.9 years (maximum, 3.8 years). The mean grade of aortic insufficiency was signific antly reduced after repair, with no change in mean gradients. Freedom from reoperation over the follow-up period was 97% (33/34), and freedom from ≥3+ recurrent aortic insufficiency was 94% (32/34). ConclusionsA geometric annuloplasty ring can be used to help achieve consistently successful aortic valve repair with excellent perioperative and follow-up outcomes, even in pediatric and complex congenital heart disease patients.

"Close but no cigar": Successful aortic valve repair using autologous pericardium.

"Close but no cigar": Successful aortic valve repair using autologous pericardium.

4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance for monitoring of aortic valve repair in bicuspid aortic valve disease

BackgroundAortic valve repair has become a treatment option for adults with symptomatic bicuspid (BAV) or unicuspid (UAV) aortic valve insufficiency. Our aim was to demonstrate the feasibility of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to assess the impact of aortic valve repair on changes in blood flow dynamics in patients with symptomatic BAV or UAV.MethodsTwenty patients with adult congenital heart disease (median 35 years, range 18–64; 16 male) and symptomatic aortic valve regurgitation (15 BAV, 5 UAV) were prospectively studied. All patients underwent 4D flow CMR before and after aortic valve repair. Aortic valve regurgitant fraction and systolic peak velocity were estimated. The degree of helical and vortical flow was evaluated according to a 3-point scale. Relative flow displacement and wall shear stress (WSS) were quantified at predefined levels in the thoracic aorta.ResultsAll patients underwent successful aortic valve repair with a significant reduction of aortic valve regurgitation (16.7 ± 9.8% to 6.4 ± 4.4%, p < 0.001) and systolic peak velocity (2.3 ± 0.9 to 1.9 ± 0.4 m/s, p = 0.014). Both helical flow (1.6 ± 0.6 vs. 0.9 ± 0.5, p < 0.001) and vortical flow (1.2 ± 0.8 vs. 0.5 ± 0.6, p = 0.002) as well as both flow displacement (0.3 ± 0.1 vs. 0.25 ± 0.1, p = 0.031) and WSS (0.8 ± 0.2 N/m2 vs. 0.5 ± 0.2 N/m2, p < 0.001) in the ascending aorta were significantly reduced after aortic valve repair.Conclusions4D flow CMR allows assessment of the impact of aortic valve repair on changes in blood flow dynamics in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.

EP07 AORTIC VALVE REPAIR TECHNIQUES: AN EARLY EXPERIENCE FROM A SINGLE UK CENTRE

Background and aim: Aortic valve repair (AVr) is an evolving area with only few European centres reporting a large volume experience. Very few other surgical units have adopted this approach, even in patients with pure aortic regurgitation (AR). Our aim is to report our early experience with AVr techniques. Method: 59 patients with a mean age of 49 years (range 19–85) underwent AVr for either primary (cusp prolapse or perforation) or secondary (aortic root and/or ascending aneurysms) AR. 14 patients had a bicuspid aortic valve. Standard repair techniques were used including: sub-commissural annuloplasty, STJ remodelling, free-edge plication, commissural resuspension, raphe resection, free-edge reinforcement and VSRR. Results: All patients underwent successful AVr including 1 patient who required a 2nd pump run. The post-bypass TOE demonstrated no/trace AR in 49 (83%) cases, mild central AR in 8 (13.6%) and mild eccentric AR in only 2 (3.4%) cases. 30 day survival was 100%. 2 patients suffered post-operative strokes, none required PPM insertion. At a mean clinical follow-up of 4.7 ± 2.7 years all patients are alive and well. Echo follow-up (2.3 ± 1.9 y) showed: no or trace AR in 25 patients (42.4%), mild AR in 22 patients (37.3%), moderate AR in 11 patients (18.6%), severe AR in 1 patient (1.7%), who underwent re-do AVR 5 years after VSRR. Freedom from re-operation was 87% at 8 years. Conclusion: Despite achieving an excellent immediate (post-bypass) technical result, we remain cautious about the long-term durability of AVr procedures. We therefore continue to carefully evaluate AVr in our practice.

Why I choose to repair and not to replace the aortic valve?

Aortic valve replacement whether surgical or transcutaneous remains an option for the treatment of severe aortic valve disease; however, current prosthetic devices are associated with complications including, but no limited to, valve thrombosis and thromboembolic events, bleeding events associated with anticoagulation use, prosthetic valve endocarditis and structural valve deterioration. In this effect, aortic valve repair (AVr) has become an attractive alternative in circumventing these potential complications by preservation of the native aortic valve apparatus. In this article, we attempt to present the progress made for AVr over the last two decades. We also wish to highlight the critical steps for successful AVr and the outcome data that demonstrate that can be first-choice treatment in selected patients and finally to emphasize on the key steps for further future development.

Aortic valve repair with autologous pericardium for traumatic aortic valve regurgitation.

We present a case of successful aortic valve repair for traumatic aortic valve regurgitation. A 26-year-old male who had a history of motor-cycle accident months prior to admission, was referred to our hospital for surgical treatment of severe aortic valve regurgitation. Intraoperative inspection revealed a tear in noncoronary cusp, with otherwise preserved valvular anatomy. Aortic valvuloplasty was successfully performed with closure using an autologous pericardium patch. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram confirmed absence of residual regurgitation.

Cusp height in aortic valves

Successful aortic valve repair must normalize cusp and root dimensions. Limited information is available on the normal dimensions of human cusps, in particular the cusp height. The cusp height was measured intraoperatively in 621 patients during aortic valve repair procedures. A tricuspid anatomy was present in 329 patients and bicuspid in 286 patients. In addition, patient age, gender, height, weight, preoperative degree of aortic regurgitation, and aortic dimensions were recorded. The data were analyzed for possible interrelation between the cusp height and clinical variables. In the bicuspid valves, the geometric height of the nonfused cusp ranged from 15 to 30 mm (mean, 23.8 ± 2.0). Significant correlations were found between the cusp height and all clinical variables. In the tricuspid valves, the height of the noncoronary cusp ranged from 14 to 28 mm (mean, 20.7 ± 2.2). The height of the left coronary cusp varied from 12 to 25 mm (mean, 20.0 ± 2.1) and that of the right coronary cusp from 12 to 25 mm (mean, 20.0 ± 2.1). The noncoronary cusp was significantly greater than the left and the right coronary cusp (P = .000). No difference was found between the left and right cusps (P = .513). Significant correlations between the geometric height and clinical parameters were found for most clinical variables, excluding the degree of aortic regurgitation. We found the cusp height was larger than previously published. It shows marked variability and correlates with the clinical variables. These data might serve as the basis for decision making in aortic valve repair.

Aortic valve repair: a glimpse into the future

Aortic valve repair: a glimpse into the future

Results of Reoperation on the Aortic Root and the Ascending Aorta

Reoperations on the aortic root and the ascending aorta after previous aortic valve and proximal aortic surgery are increasingly frequent and highly demanding. The scarce comparability of the published series and the heterogeneity of clinical pictures contribute to the challenges of this subgroup. Forty-one patients (2004 to 2010) who were reoperated on the aortic root and the ascending aorta for aneurysmal, pseudoaneurysmal, or infectious disease were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively filled-in database. Mean logistic European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation was 29.8%. At index reoperation, procedures were classic Bentall (51%), prosthesis-sparing operation (17%), supracoronary ascending aortic replacement plus aortic valve replacement-repair (22%), and root replacement using valved homografts (9.7%). Distally, the operation involved the arch in 51% of cases (17 hemiarch replacement, 4 total transverse arch, 3 elephant trunk). Operative mortality was 12% and rate of major operative morbidity was 17%. At a mean 26-months follow-up, the patients surviving the operation had a good survival and functional class. The rate of adverse events during the follow-up was acceptable. Reoperations on the aortic root-ascending aorta in the elective patients have respectable operative mortality-morbidity despite the high-risk profile, and are justified by the excellent follow-up survival. The mortality can be diminished by integrated surgical strategies and optimal myocardial protection. Our findings encourage complete resection of borderline dilated ascending aortic-root tissue at primary and redo operation.

Successful valve repair in traumatic aortic valve regurgitation

Case 1 was a 20-year-old male who had been involved in a traffic accident and developed aortic regurgitation (AR) eight months later. He was admitted with dilatation of the left ventricle. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) showed severe AR with perforation of the right coronary cusp. Case 2 was a 50-year-old male who had fallen from a height four months previously, and was admitted with congestive heart failure due to severe AR. TEE showed severe AR due to rupture of the right coronary cusp. In the former patient, valve repair was performed with a patch of autologous pericardium. In the latter patient, cusp reconstruction was performed with autologous pericardium and the commissural plication technique, achieving successful aortic valve repair.

Aortic root and cusp configuration determine aortic valve function☆

Normalisation of aortic root and cusp configuration is a prerequisite for successful aortic valve repair (AVR). Using transthoracic echocardiography, we studied aortic root dimensions relative to body size in normal subjects and AVR patients. Aortic roots of healthy volunteers (n=130, age 27.9 ± 16.9 years) were examined for aortoventricular (AV), sinus (S), sinutubular-junction diameters (ST) and effective height (height difference between the AV plane and central coaptation point, eH) by transthoracic echocardiography. In 651 patients, after AVR residual aortic valve insufficiency (AI) and eH were determined. The relationships between eH versus root dimensions and eH versus residual AI were analysed by analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc testing. Root dimensions correlated with each other and body size (r=0.74-0.91). In addition, a correlation between AV (r=0.73), sinus diameter (r=0.76), body height (r=0.77), body surface area (r=0.81) and eH was found. After AVR, eH was 9.8 ± 0.9 mm in 235 patients without postoperative AI, 9.4 ± 1.1mm in 370 with mild AI, 7.9 ± 1.4mm in 43 patients with moderate AI and 6 ± 1mm in three patients with severe AI. The difference in means of effective height between the groups was significant (p<0.005). Of 497 AVR patients with an eH ≥ 9 mm, 309 had no or trivial AI, 186 had mild AI and only two had moderate AI. Parameters of aortic root dimensions follow a seemingly constant pattern in humans of different sizes. Effective height has a constant relationship to root dimensions and body size. In AVR, normalisation of eH leads to a high probability of normal or near-normal aortic valve function.

Successful aortic valve repair for severe aortic insufficiency caused by radiofrequency ablation

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Sergio Bevilacqua, Carlo Sorbara and Pier Luigi Stefano Giovanni Melina, Riccardo Codecasa, Irene Capecchi, Maria Luisa Gianfaldoni, radiofrequency ablation Successful aortic valve repair for severe aortic insufficiency caused by http://jtcs.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/130/2/564 located on the World Wide Web at: The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is

Transesophageal echocardiographic description of the mechanisms of aortic regurgitation in acute type A aortic dissection: implications for aortic valve repair

OBJECTIVESThe purpose of this study was to use transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to define the mechanisms of aortic regurgitation (AR) in acute type A aortic dissection so as to assist the surgeon in identifying patients with mechanisms of AR suitable for valve preservation.BACKGROUNDSignificant AR frequently complicates acute type A aortic dissection necessitating either aortic valve repair or replacement at the time of aortic surgery. Although direct surgical inspection can identify intrinsically normal leaflets suitable for repair, it is preferable for the surgeon to correlate aortic valve function with the anatomy prior to thoracotomy.METHODSWe studied 50 consecutive patients with acute type A aortic dissection in whom preoperative TEE findings were considered by the surgeons in planning aortic valve surgery. Six patients did not undergo surgery (noncandidacy or refusal) and one patient had had a prior aortic valve replacement and therefore was excluded from the analysis.RESULTSTwenty-seven patients had no or minimal AR and 22 had moderate or severe AR. In all, there were 16 with intrinsically normal leaflets who had AR due to one or more correctable aortic valve lesion: incomplete leaflet closure due to leaflet tethering in a dilated aortic root in 7; leaflet prolapse due to disrupted leaflet attachments in 8; and dissection flap prolapse through the aortic valve orifice in 5. Of these 16 patients, 15 had successful aortic valve repair whereas just 1 underwent aortic valve replacement after a complicated intraoperative course (unrelated to the aortic valve). Nine patients underwent aortic valve replacement for nonrepairable abnormalities, including Marfan’s syndrome in four, bicuspid aortic valve in four, and aortitis in one. In patients undergoing aortic valve repair, follow-up transthoracic echocardiography at a median of three months revealed no or minimal residual AR, and clinical follow-up at a median of 23 months showed that none required aortic valve replacement.CONCLUSIONSWhen significant AR complicates acute type A aortic dissection, TEE can define the severity and mechanisms of AR and can assist the surgeon in identifying patients in whom valve repair is likely to be successful.

A Case of Coronary Stenosis Developing After Successful Aortic Valve Repair in Cogan's Syndrome

Cogan's syndrome has been described as entity of progressive deafness and interstitial keratitis with variable cardiovascular involvement leading to aortic insufficiency or orificial stenosis of coronary or aortic arch vessels. So far, aortic valve replacement either with mechanical or biological prosthesis was favored for correction of the valvular lesion. A patient with primary successful aortic valve repair followed by coronary revascularization for left coronary ostial stenosis occurring after the first operation is presented.