Success Rate Of Endotracheal Intubation Research Articles

Efficacy of endotracheal intubation in helicopter cabin vs. ground: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundPre-hospital endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a sophisticated procedure with a comparatively high failure rate. Especially, ETI in confined spaces may result in higher difficulty, longer times, and a higher failure rate. This study analyses if Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) intubation (time-to) success are influenced by noise, light, and restricted space in comparison to ground intubation. Available literature reporting these parameters was very limited, thus the reported differences between ETI in helicopter vs. ground by confronting parameters such as time to secure airway, first pass success rate and Cormack-Lehane Score were analysed.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Ovid on October 15th, 2022. The database search provided 2322 studies and 6 studies met inclusion and quality criteria. The research was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022361793).ResultsA total of six studies were selected and analysed as part of the systematic review and meta-analysis. The first pass success rate of ETI was more likely to fail in the helicopter setting as compared to the ground (82,4% vs. 87,3%), but the final success rate was similar between the two settings (96,8% vs. 97,8%). The success rate of intubation in literature was reported higher in physician-staffed HEMS than in paramedic-staffed HEMS. The impact of aircraft type and location inside the vehicle on intubation success rates was inconclusive across studies. The meta-analysis revealed inconsistent results for the mean duration of intubation, with one study reporting shorter intubation times in helicopters (13,0s vs.15,5s), another reporting no significant differences (16,5s vs. 16,8s), and a third reporting longer intubation times in helicopters (16,1s vs. 15,0s).ConclusionFurther research is needed to assess the impact of environmental factors on the quality of ETI on HEMS. While the success rate of endotracheal intubation in helicopters vs. on the ground is not significantly different, the duration and time to secure the airway, and Cormack-Lehane Score may be influenced by environmental factors. However, the limited number of studies reporting on these factors highlights the need for further research in this area.

Cadaveric Study on Comparison of Neck Extension Angles for Endotracheal Intubation in Rabbits Using a Rigid and Flexible Endoscope.

Endotracheal intubation in rabbits is always challenging due to the unique anatomical conformation. To improve endotracheal intubation success, this study determined the relationship between head placement angles guided by endoscope-assisted visualization techniques and the endotracheal intubation success rate. Thirty-two rabbit cadavers were used in the study. Six veterinary practitioners who had no experience with rabbit endotracheal intubation were randomly assigned to intubate rabbit cadavers using the guidance of either a rigid endoscope (RE) or flexible endoscope (FE), with the head placement angles with an ascending neck at 90, 100, 110, 120 and 130 degrees. The endotracheal intubation completed in 90 s was determined to be a success. The success rates using RE and FE were 97.2% and 95.9%, respectively. The means and standard error of means (SEM) of endotracheal intubation times guided by RE and FE were 53.7 ± 4.68 and 55.2 ± 4.24 s, respectively. Results from survival time analysis show that the five veterinarians successfully intubated the rabbit within 90 s, regardless of the different types of endoscopes. Angle was the only significant factor that affected the endotracheal intubation success. The head placement angle at 110 and 120 degrees had the highest success rate of endotracheal intubation compared to 90 degrees (p ≤ 0.05). In conclusion, for inexperienced veterinarians, the success of endotracheal intubation in rabbits, guided by endoscope-assisted visualized techniques regardless of rigid endoscope or flexible endoscope guidance, is improved when the head extension is 110 and 120 degrees.

Comparing Alba 3D printed video laryngoscope vs. video laryngoscope C-MAC® vs. direct macintosh laryngoscope operated by medical students: A randomized, crossover, manikin study

Endotracheal intubation is the gold standard for airway management. Direct laryngoscopy is a difficult procedure with a high failure rate. A 3D printed video laryngoscope can be used as a more affordable replacement for a laryngoscope. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rate and time of endotracheal intubation in manikins using the Alba 3D printed video laryngoscope, the C-MAC video laryngoscope and the Macintosh operated by medical students. This study was conducted using a cross sectional randomised study method involving 36 medical students. This study found that the mean endotracheal intubation time using Alba 3D Print was significantly shorter than using Macintosh, but not better than C-MAC (VL3D-25 vs LDM-50.5 vs VLC-21.5 s) with a p-value of <0.001. The success rate of endotracheal intubation using Alba 3D moulds was significantly better than using Macintosh, but not statistically significant when compared to C-MAC (VL3D-91.7% vs LDM-97.2% vs VLC-75%) with p-value <0.05). This study concluded that the use of Alba 3D prints has a better success rate and time compared to Macinctosh and can be an affordable alternative to commercial video laryngoscopes such as C-MAC for educational purposes.

Effect of Blade Size on the First-Pass Success Rate of Endotracheal Intubation Using the C-MAC Video Laryngoscope.

We sought to determine whether blade size influences the first-pass success (FPS) rate when performing endotracheal intubation (ETI) with a C-MAC video laryngoscope (VL) in emergency department (ED) patients. This single-center, retrospective, observational study was conducted between August 2016 and July 2022. A total of 1467 patients was divided into two categories based on the blade size used during the first ETI attempt: blade-3 (n = 365) and blade-4 groups (n = 1102). The primary outcome was the FPS rate. The secondary outcomes included the glottic view, multiple attempt rate, and ETI-related complications. We used propensity score matching to reduce the potential confounders between the two groups. Among these, 363 pairs of matched propensity scores were generated. The FPS rate did not differ between the blade-3 (84.8%) and blade-4 groups (87.3%) in the matched cohort (p = 0.335). The multiple attempt rate did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.289) and was 3.9% and 2.5% in the blade-3 and blade-4 groups, respectively. The difficult glottic view (11.3 vs. 6.9%, p = 0.039) and complication rates (15.4% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.047) were significantly higher in the blade-3 group than in the blade-4 group. The FPS rates of ETI with the blade-3 and blade-4 groups in adult patients in the ED did not differ significantly.

Success rates of endotracheal intubation using the standard method versus the modified-ramped position.

The sniffing position used in intubation has disadvantages, including suboptimal glottic view, respiratory problems, increased risk of aspiration, and pain. In this regard, we have proposed new conditions to facilitate intubation and tube placement in patients with a Mallampati score higher than 2, by introducing a new position called the modified rapid airway management positioner (RAMP) position. The authors compared various parameters to improve intubation conditions between these two positions. This intervention is a randomized clinical trial study, with a random sampling method that divides the patients into two groups: a control group placed in the standard position (S) and an intervention group placed in the modified (M) RAMP position. An anesthesiologist performed intubation. In group (S), patients were placed in the supine position as usual, and a pillow with a height of 10cm was placed under their heads. In group (M), the patients were placed in the supine position on a modified RAMP with a triangular shape, 15cm in height, and 80cm in length, at a 30° angle. The pillow had lengths of 20 and 80cm. In the present study, 112 patients were investigated, consisting of 58 women (51.8%) and 54 men (48.2%). The intubation time in the intervention group using the modified RAMP roll technique was significantly shorter (51.25s) compared to the control group using the standard method (88.39s) (P=0.019). The results of the study showed that the modified RAMP roll improved the general conditions of intubation and led to a better view of the glottis in direct laryngoscopy. This is a very important aspect of intubation, and with a better view of the pharynx and glottis, the intubation procedure can be performed with higher quality, reducing the number of intubation attempts and the duration of the procedure.

Using a Bougie With C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy Did Not Improve First-Attempt Intubation Success Rates in Critical Care Air Transport

ObjectiveStudies have shown a bougie improves first-attempt success rates when used in combination with direct laryngoscopy during the initial attempt. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of a bougie in combination with C-MAC (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) improves first-attempt success rates of endotracheal intubation (ETI) compared with C-MAC with a traditional stylet. MethodsThis study is a retrospective chart review using data collected on 371 intubations completed by a single air medical service using the C-MAC laryngoscope and either a bougie or a stylet. ResultsThe overall success rate using C-MAC for ETI with either a bougie or a stylet was 83%. There was no statistically significant difference between first-attempt successful intubations using C-MAC and a bougie (82%) or a stylet (86%) (χ1 = 0.871, P = .351). There was no statistically significant difference between laryngoscopy grade and the number of attempts that resulted in a successful intubation (χ1 = 0.743, P = .7). ConclusionThere was no difference between first-attempt success rates using video laryngoscopy with a bougie, overall intubation success rates, or difficult intubation success rates compared with video laryngoscopy with a stylet, indicating that the purpose of a bougie as a rescue device did not hold true in the prehospital setting of our critical care air medical service.

Just-In-Time Neonatal Endotracheal Intubation Simulation Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial

To assess if simulation-based just-in-time training (JITT, short video and simulation) is superior to video training (5-minute video) in acquiring skill in neonatal endotracheal intubation (ETI). A Canadian multicenter randomized trial recruited junior residents who performed neonatal ETI from July 2017 to June 2021. The primary outcomes were overall and first attempt ETI success rate. Secondary outcomes included number of attempts, duration of attempts, ETI-related complications, and residents' confidence level. Statistical analysis included generalized estimating equations, mixed model analysis, Mann-Whitney test, and χ² tests. Sixty-five residents performed 139 ETI. The overall success rate was similar for both groups (67% vs 70%, P=.71). However, the first attempt success rate was higher for the simulation-based JITT group (54% vs 41%, P=.035). The mean duration of attempts was shorter (35 [SD, 9] vs 62 [SD, 9] seconds, P=.048) and the median number of attempts had a tendency to be lower for the simulation-based JITT group (1 [IQR, 1; 1] vs 1 [IQR, 1; 2], P=.02). There were more mucosal trauma events in the simulation-based JITT group (P=.02). Residents in both groups reported similar confidence level in performing ETI. Compared with video training, simulation-based JITT for neonatal ETI did not improve overall success rate. However, simulation-based JITT improved first attempt success rate and decreased the number and the duration of ETI attempts. With its positive clinical impact, simulation-based JITT can become an educational adjunct to neonatal ETI training for residents. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02809924.

Introduction of Infection Prevention Tracheal Intubation Protocol during the COVID-19 Pandemic Is Not Associated with First-Pass Success Rates of Endotracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department: A Before-and-After Comparative Study.

Aerosols and droplets have put healthcare workers performing airway management at high risk of contracting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Experts have developed endotracheal intubation (ETI) guidelines and protocols to protect intubators from infection. We aimed to determine whether changes in the emergency department (ED) intubation protocol to prevent COVID-19 infection were associated with first-pass success (FPS) rates in ETI. We used data from the airway management registries in two academic EDs. The study was divided into pre-pandemic (January 2018 to January 2020) and pandemic (February 2020 to February 2022) periods. We selected 2476 intubation cases, including 1151 and 1325 cases recorded before and during the pandemic, respectively. During the pandemic, the FPS rate was 92.2%, which did not change significantly, and major complications increased slightly but not significantly compared with the pre-pandemic period. The OR for the FPS of applying infection prevention intubation protocols was 0.72 (p = 0.069) in a subgroup analysis, junior emergency physicians (PGY1 residents) had an FPS of less than 80% regardless of pandemic protocol implementation. The FPS rate of senior emergency physicians in physiologically difficult airways decreased significantly during the pandemic (98.0% to 88.5%). In conclusion, the FPS rate and complications for adult ETI performed by emergency physicians using COVID-19 infection prevention intubation protocols were similar to pre-pandemic conditions.

Comparison of clinical performance of Ambu® AuraGain™ and BlockBuster® in anaesthetised preschool children-A randomised controlled trial.

Supraglottic airway (SGA) devices are a boon to paediatric airway management. The clinical performances of the BlockBuster® laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and Ambu® AuraGain™ in preschool children were compared in this study. After ethical approval and trial registration, this randomised controlled study was conducted on 50 children, aged 1-4 years, randomised into two groups. Appropriate sized Ambu® AuraGain™ (group A) and LMA BlockBuster® (group B) were placed as per the manufacturer's recommendation under general anaesthesia. Appropriate size of the endotracheal tube was then chosen and inserted through the device. Primary objective of the study was to compare the oropharyngeal seal pressure (OSP), and secondary objectives were the first attempt intubation success rate, overall intubation success rate, SGA insertion time, intubation time, haemodynamic changes and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal complications. The Chi-square test was used to analyse the categorical variables, while the intragroup comparison of mean changes in outcomes was evaluated by the unpaired t-test. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Demographic parameters were uniformly distributed in both the groups. The mean OSP in group A was 26.6 ± 0.95 cm H2O and in group B was 29.08 ± 0.75 cm H2O. Both the devices were successfully inserted in all the patients. The success rate of blind endotracheal intubation through the device in first attempt was 4% in group A and 80% in group B. Postoperative pharyngolaryngeal complications were relatively less in group B. LMA BlockBuster® provides higher OSP and provides a higher success rate of blind endotracheal intubation in paediatric patients.

We must not sacrifice anaesthesia rotations as part of emergency medicine training.

We must not sacrifice anaesthesia rotations as part of emergency medicine training.

Aerosol Box Use in Reducing Health Care Worker Contamination During Airway Procedures (AIRWAY Study)

The aerosol box has been used during the management of patients with COVID-19 to reduce health care practitioner (HCP) exposure during aerosol-generating medical procedures (AGMPs). Little is known about the effect of aerosol box use on HCP contamination and AGMP procedure time. To investigate whether use of an aerosol box during AGMPs reduces HCP contamination or influences the time to successful completion and first-pass success rate for endotracheal intubation (ETI) and laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion. This multicenter, simulation-based, randomized clinical trial was conducted from May to December 2021 at tertiary care pediatric hospitals. Participant teams performed 3 simulated patient scenarios: bag-valve-mask ventilation, ETI, and LMA insertion. During the scenarios, aerosols were generated using Glo Germ. Teams of 2 HCPs were randomly assigned to control (no aerosol box) or intervention groups (aerosol box). Statistical analysis was performed from July 2022 to February 2023. The aerosol box (or SplashGuard CG) is a transparent, plastic barrier covering the patient's head and shoulders with access ports allowing HCPs to manage the airway. The primary outcome was surface area of contamination (AOC) on participants. Secondary outcomes were time to successful completion and first-pass success rates for ETI and LMA insertion. A total of 64 teams (128 participants) were enrolled, with data from 61 teams (122 participants) analyzed. Among the 122 participants analyzed, 79 (64.8%) were female and 85 (69.7%) were physicians. Use of an aerosol box was associated with a 77.5% overall decreased AOC to the torso (95% CI, -86.3% to -62.9%; P < .001) and a 60.7% overall decreased AOC to the facial area (95% CI, -75.2% to -37.8%; P < .001) in airway HCPs. There was no statistically significant difference in surface contamination after doffing personal protective equipment between groups. Time to completing ETI was longer in the aerosol box group compared with the control group (mean difference: 10.2 seconds; 95% CI, 0.2 to 20.2 seconds; P = .04), but there was no difference between groups for LMA insertion (mean difference: 2.4 seconds; 95% CI, -8.7 to 13.5 seconds; P = .67). In this randomized clinical trial of aerosol box use in AGMPs, use of an aerosol box reduced contamination deposition on HCPs' torso and face predoffing; the use of an aerosol box delayed time to successful intubation. These results suggest that the incremental benefits of reduced surface contamination from aerosol box use should be weighed against delayed time to complete intubation, which may negatively affect patient outcome. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04880668.

Transitioning from Direct to Video Laryngoscopy during the COVID-19 Pandemic Was Associated with a Higher Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate

Objective The objective of this study was to determine the effect of transitioning from direct laryngoscopy (DL) to video laryngoscopy (VL) on endotracheal intubation success overall and with enhanced precautions implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We examined electronic transport records from Mayo Clinic Ambulance Service, a large advanced life support (ALS) provider serving rural, suburban, and urban areas in Minnesota and Wisconsin, USA. We determined the success of intubation attempts when using DL (March 10, 2018 to December 19, 2019), VL (December 20, 2019 to September 29, 2021), and VL with an enhanced COVID-19 guideline that restricted intubation to one attempt, performed by the most experienced clinician, who wore enhanced personal protective equipment (April 1 to December 18, 2020). Success rates at first attempt and after any attempt were assessed for association with type of laryngoscopy (VL vs DL) after adjusting for patient age group, patient weight, use of enhanced COVID-19 guideline, medical vs trauma patient, and ALS vs critical care clinician. A secondary analysis further adjusted for degree of glottic visualization. Results We identified 895 intubation attempts using DL and 893 intubation attempts using VL, which included 382 VL intubation attempts using the enhanced COVID-19 guideline. Success on first intubation attempt was 69.2% for encounters with DL, 82.9% overall with VL, and 83.2% with VL and enhanced COVID-19 protocols (DL vs overall VL: p < 0.001; COVID-19 vs non-COVID VL: p = 0.86). In multivariable analysis, use of VL was associate with higher odds of successful intubation on first attempt (odds ratio, 2.28; 95%CI, 1.73–3.01; p < 0.001) and on any attempt (odds ratio, 2.16; 95%CI, 1.58–2.96; p < 0.001) compared with DL. Inclusion of glottic visualization in the model resulted in a nonsignificant association between laryngoscopy type and successful first intubation (p = 0.41) and a significant association with the degree of glottic visualization (p < 0.001). Conclusions VL is designed to improve glottic visualization. The use of VL by a large, U.S. multistate ALS ambulance service was associated with increased odds of successful first-pass and overall attempted intubation, which was mediated by better visualization of the glottis. COVID-19 protocols were not associated with success rates.

Association between First-pass Intubation Success and Enhanced PPE Use during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Objectives We evaluated first-pass endotracheal intubation (ETI) success within the critical care transport (CCT) environment using a natural experiment created by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our primary objective was to evaluate if the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) or the COVID-19 time period was associated with differences in first-pass success rates of ETI within a large CCT system with a high baseline ETI first-pass success rate. We hypothesized that pandemic-related challenges would be associated with decreased first-pass success rates. Methods We performed a retrospective before-after cohort study of airway management by CCT personnel relative to the COVID-19 pandemic. We used a mixed effects logistic regression to evaluate the association between enhanced PPE (N95 mask, eye protection) use and the pandemic time period on first-pass intubation success, while controlling for other factors potentially associated with intubation success. Variables in the final model included patient demographics (age, sex, and race), body mass index, medical category (trauma versus non-trauma), interfacility or scene response, blade size (Macintosh 3 versus 4), use of face mask, use of eye protection, and crew member length of service. Results We identified 1279 cases involving intubation attempts on adult patients during the study period. A total of 1133 cases were included in the final analysis, with an overall first-pass success rate of 95.7% (96.4% pre-COVID-19 and 94.8% during COVID-19). In our final mixed effects logistic regression model, enhanced PPE use and the COVID-19 time period were not associated with first-pass intubation success rate. Conclusion In a large regional CCT system with a high ETI first-pass success rate, neither PPE use nor the COVID-19 time period were associated with differences in ETI first-pass success while controlling for relevant patient and operational factors. Other emergency medical services (EMS) systems may have encountered different effects of pandemic-related PPE use on intubation success rates. Further studies are needed to evaluate the influence of sustained use of enhanced PPE or changes in training or procedural experience on post-pandemic ETI first-pass success rates for non-CCT EMS clinicians.

Direct versus Video Laryngoscopy during Simulated Mechanical Chest Compressions: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Sir, Mechanical compression devices are often utilized for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (mCPR) in the emergency department (ED). We conducted an investigation to evaluate the time to intubation, operator confidence, and success rates of endotracheal intubation with video laryngoscopy (VL) versus direct laryngoscopy (DL) during simulated mCPR. This was a prospective, randomized crossover trial. Thirty consenting emergency physicians were surveyed about experience/technique preferences, and then performed intubations on a moderately difficult airway and adult Manikin during simulated mCPR (LUCAS 3.0) at 100 compressions/min. Technique order was randomized. Intubation time defined as blade pick up until the tube cuff inflated. Participants rated success confidence on a 5-point scale (high = 5) and provided the Cormack/Lehane grade (difficult = 3 or 4). The scenario was repeated with the alternate technique. The categorical variables analyzed by the Chi-square and continuous variables by t-tests. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to control for confounding. There were 30 participants: 73% with 1–5 years of experience, 40% with >100 prior intubations, 73% utilized mac 4 direct blade, and 60% prefer VL during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Participants had first pass intubation success for all but one of the attempts with both modalities (NS). Participants more often expressed “high confidence” that intubation was successful for direct 60% versus video 77% (P = 0.2), but they more often rated the airway “difficult” for direct (40% vs. 10%; P = 0.01). Within bivariate analysis, mean time difference to intubate was less for DL versus VL (−6.8 s; P = 0.02). There were no significant associations between time differences to intubate for the following variables: experience (P = 0.6), >100 prior intubations (P = 0.8), blade size (P = 0.3), preferred technique (P = 0.8), high confidence successful DL (P = 0.5), high confidence successful VL (P = 0.7), rating of difficult view DL (P = 0.8), and rating of difficult view VL (P = 0.9). In the multivariate logistic regression with time difference as the dependent variable, there were no statistically significant independent variables. Several prior investigators have reported the success rates of endotracheal intubation with and without chest compressions.[1–5] Han etal. described that VL was superior to DL in simulated CPR settings and that interruption of chest compressions was seemingly unnecessary.[1,3] However, within our literature search, we did not find earlier studies comparing VL versus DL mCPR. In contrast to the findings of Han etal., we observed a lower mean time difference to intubation for DL versus VL during simulated mCPR in our current study, although such differences are unlikely clinically meaningful. On the other hand, participants in our study group were more confident that intubation was successful when using VL. The limitations of our study include single center site, small sample size, participants had varying prior intubation experience, and the high-fidelity Manikin may not replicate all the aspects of difficult intubation in the setting of actual CPR in the ED. Future studies evaluating DL versus VL during mCPR should be conducted in the clinical setting. Research quality and ethics statement The authors followed applicable EQUATOR Network (http://www.equator-network.org/) guidelines, notably the CARE guideline, during the conduct of this report. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Demographic disparities in tracheal intubation success rates during infant out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

ObjectivesTracheal intubation is a skill performed by qualified emergency medical services (EMS) providers during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in adult and pediatric patients. Unsuccessful intubation can negatively impact a patient's likelihood of survival. Thus, intubation success rates are an important quality improvement benchmark. Given other demographic disparities that have been reported in adults and children, we hypothesize there might be disparities in intubation success across infant race/ethnicity and/or sex. MethodsWe examined a national-level registry of EMS activations in the United States (NEMSIS). Inclusion criteria were OHCA calls involving infant patients (under 1 years of age) between January 2017 and May 2022 where EMS attempted tracheal intubation, documented whether the procedure was successful, and documented information about the patient's demographics (eg. race/ethnicity and sex). Intubation success rates across patient sex and racial/ethnic categories with more than one-hundred cardiac arrests with intubation attempts were compared. ResultsA total of 3663 infant cardiac arrests where tracheal intubation was attempted met inclusion criteria. White infants were associated with significantly higher rates of intubation success (62.2%) when compared with Black or African American infants (58.1%) and Hispanic/Latino infants (56.2%) (p < .01). Female infants were associated with slightly higher rates of intubation success than male infants, but this difference was not significant (p > .2). ConclusionSignificant demographic disparities in endotracheal intubation success rates exist among infants who experience OHCA. Future studies should continue to examine these disparities with the goal of identifying why these differences occur and concrete mechanisms for eliminating such disparities.

A prospective randomized study of different height of operation table for tracheal intubation with videolaryngoscopy in ramped position

BackgroundPrevious studies have reported that the ramped position provides a better laryngoscopic view, reduces tracheal intubation time, and increases the success rate of endotracheal intubation. However, the patient’s head height changes while in the ramped position, which in turn changes the relative positions of the patient and intubator. Thus, making these changes may affect the efficiency of tracheal intubation; however, few studies have addressed this problem. This study analyzed intubation time and conditions during tracheal intubation using videolaryngoscope in the ramped position.MethodsThis prospective study included 144 patients who were scheduled to receive general anesthesia for surgeries involving orotracheal intubation. The participants were randomly allocated to either the nipple or umbilical group according to the table height. Mask ventilation was assessed using the Warters grading scale. Tracheal intubation was performed using a McGrath MAC laryngoscope. The total intubation time, laryngoscopy time, tube insertion time, and difficulty of intubation (IDS score) were measured.ResultsThe umbilical group had a significantly shorter laryngoscopy time (10 ± 3 vs. 16 ± 4 s), tube insertion time (18 ± 4 vs. 24 ± 6 s), and total intubation time (28 ± 5 vs. 40 ± 7 s) compared to the nipple group. No significant difference in the difficulty of mask ventilation was observed between the two groups. The IDS score was higher in the nipple than umbilical group.ConclusionThe lower (umbilical) table level reduced the intubation time and difficulty of videolaryngoscopy compared to the higher (nipple) table level.Trial registrationThis study was registered at KCT0005987, 11/03/2021, Retrospectively registered.

Airway management for 362 cesarean deliveries performed with general anesthesia at a Texas level IV maternal facility

At our hospital, direct and video laryngoscopy are used in airway management for cesarean deliveries performed with general anesthesia. We hypothesized that video laryngoscopy would have a higher success rate of endotracheal intubation on the first attempt compared to direct laryngoscopy. We used our electronic medical record system to search for patients who had cesarean deliveries with general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation performed in the operating room from July 1, 2017, through June 30, 2021. Totals of 186 and 176 patients had direct and video laryngoscopy for the first intubation attempts, respectively; 177 (95%) and 163 (93%) patients, respectively, had a successful intubation on the first attempt with each method. The odds ratio of successful intubation on the first attempt for video laryngoscopy was 0.64 (95% CI 0.27, 1.53; P = 0.31) compared to patients who had direct laryngoscopy. There was no statistically significant difference in Cormack-Lehane grade views of the glottis between direct and video laryngoscopy on the first attempt. In conclusion, there was no statistically significant improvement in the success rate of intubation on the first attempt when video laryngoscopy was used for patients undergoing general anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Comparative study of intubating LMA and I-gel for ease of insertion and as a conduit for endotracheal intubation

Background: A recently introduced supraglottic airway device (SAD) has been claimed to be an efficient supraglottic airway. It can also be used as a conduit for endotracheal intubation. However, LMA frequently used for this purpose; hence in this randomized study, success rate of blind tracheal intubation through two different SADs i-gel and LMA was evaluated. Methods: This is a prospective study was conducted in the Department of Anesthesia at Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences &amp; Research Centre among 140 patients fulfilling the criteria. Fasting patients with ages 20-50 years undergoing elective procedures under general anesthesia with ASA physical status 1 and 2 and Mallampatti class I and II were included in the study. Whereas patients with ASA physical status 3 or 4, and having contraindications to insertion of LMA or i-gel™ such as; mouth opening less than 2 cm, increased risk of aspiration, anticipated difficult intubation and facemask ventilation, with Mallampatti class III to IV were excluded. Results: One of the groups was administered the I-gel (Group G) and the other group was given I-LMA (Group L). Two groups were statistically similar in terms of distribution of ASA physical status grading (p&lt;0.05). Two groups were statistically similar in terms of mallampati score distribution. Distribution of duration of surgery was not statistically significant in both the groups (p&gt;0.05). It was observed that insertion I-gel was easy in 50 out of 70 patients. Difficulin 56 out of 70 patients. Difficult to insertion took place in 14 patients. The comparison of ease of insertion between the two groups did not reveal any statistical significance (p&gt;0.05). Conclusion: We concluded I-gel aids easy and rapid insertion as a supraglottic airway device, but when it is used as a conduit for blind endotracheal intubation, the failure rate is high as there is more incidence of oesophageal intubation. On the contrary, ILMA being a gold standard device meant for intubation guide has a high first attempt success rate for blind endotracheal intubation.

A tiny baby intubation team improves endotracheal intubation success rate but decreases residents' training opportunities.

To assess the educational and clinical impact of a tiny baby intubation team (TBIT). Retrospective study comparing endotracheal intubation (ETI) performed: pre-implementation of a TBIT (T1), 6 months post-implementation (T2), and 4 years post-implementation (T3). Post-implementation (T2), first-attempt success rate in tiny babies increased (44% T1; 59% T2, p = 0.04; 56% T3, p = NS) and the proportion of ETIs performed by residents decreased (53% T1; 37% T2, p = 0.001; 45% T3, p = NS). After an educational quality improvement intervention (prioritizing non-tiny baby ETIs to residents, systematic simulation training and ETI using videolaryngoscopy), in T3 residents' overall (67% T1; 60% T2, p = NS; 79% T3, p = 0.02) and non-tiny baby ETI success rate improved (72% T1; 60% T2, p = NS; 82% T3, p = 0.02). A TBIT improves success rate of ETIs in ELBW infants but decreases educational exposure of residents. Educational strategies may help maintain resident procedural competency without impacting on quality of care.

A test prototype of a novel flexible video laryngoscope and preliminary verification in a difficult airway management simulator

BackgroundTo verify a test prototype of a novel flexible video laryngoscope in a difficult airway management simulator and to compare the efficacy of the flexible video laryngoscope with that of a conventional video laryngoscope.MethodsFifteen clinical anesthesiologists performed endotracheal intubation with a flexible video laryngoscope and a conventional video laryngoscope in a difficult airway management simulator in the neutral position with intermediate and difficult mouth opening. The rate of intubation success, intubation time, and classification of glottic exposure were recorded. After endotracheal intubation, participants were asked to assess the difficulty of intubation of the two laryngoscopes.ResultsThe success rate of endotracheal intubation with flexible video laryngoscope was significantly higher than that with video laryngoscope in neutral positions with both intermediate (P = 0.025) and difficult (P = 0.005) mouth opening. The Cormack Lehane score of the flexible video laryngoscope was significantly lower than that of the video laryngoscope in the neutral position with intermediate mouth opening (P < 0.001) and difficult mouth opening (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in intubation time in the neutral position with intermediate mouth opening (P = 0.460) or difficult mouth opening (P = 0.078). The difficulty score of endotracheal intubations with the flexible video laryngoscope was also significantly lower than that of the video laryngoscope in the neutral position with intermediate mouth opening (P = 0.001) and difficult mouth opening (P = 0.001).ConclusionsCompared with conventional video laryngoscopy, flexible video laryngoscopy can provide superior glottic exposure and improve the success rate of intubation in a difficult airway management simulator.