Subtelomeric Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Research Articles

Noniron deficiency microcytic anemia, dysmorphic features, and intellectual disability: Diagnostic clues for α-thalassemia/mental retardation associated with chromosome 16 syndrome

Noniron deficiency microcytic anemia, dysmorphic features, and intellectual disability: Diagnostic clues for α-thalassemia/mental retardation associated with chromosome 16 syndrome

Screening for Subtelomeric Rearrangements in Thai Patients with Intellectual Disabilities Using FISH and Review of Literature on Subtelomeric FISH in 15,591 Cases with Intellectual Disabilities.

We utilized fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to screen for subtelomeric rearrangements in 82 Thai patients with unexplained intellectual disability (ID) and detected subtelomeric rearrangements in 5 patients. Here, we reported on a patient with der(20)t(X;20)(p22.3;q13.3) and a patient with der(3)t(X;3)(p22.3;p26.3). These rearrangements have never been described elsewhere. We also reported on a patient with der(10)t(7;10)(p22.3;q26.3), of which the same rearrangement had been reported in one literature. Well-recognized syndromes were detected in two separated patients, including 4p deletion syndrome and 1p36 deletion syndrome. All patients with subtelomeric rearrangements had both ID and multiple congenital anomalies (MCA) and/or dysmorphic features (DF), except the one with der(20)t(X;20), who had ID alone. By using FISH, the detection rate of subtelomeric rearrangements in patients with both ID and MCA/DF was 8.5%, compared to 2.9% of patients with only ID. Literature review found 28 studies on the detection of subtelomeric rearrangements by FISH in patients with ID. Combining data from these studies and our study, 15,591 patients were examined and 473 patients with subtelomeric rearrangements were determined. The frequency of subtelomeric rearrangements detected by FISH in patients with ID was 3%. Terminal deletions were found in 47.7%, while unbalanced derivative chromosomes were found in 47.9% of the rearrangements.

In vivo transplantation of neurosphere-like bodies derived from the human postnatal and adult enteric nervous system: a pilot study.

Recent advances in the in vitro characterization of human adult enteric neural progenitor cells have opened new possibilities for cell-based therapies in gastrointestinal motility disorders. However, whether these cells are able to integrate within an in vivo gut environment is still unclear. In this study, we transplanted neural progenitor-containing neurosphere-like bodies (NLBs) in a mouse model of hypoganglionosis and analyzed cellular integration of NLB-derived cell types and functional improvement. NLBs were propagated from postnatal and adult human gut tissues. Cells were characterized by immunohistochemistry, quantitative PCR and subtelomere fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). For in vivo evaluation, the plexus of murine colon was damaged by the application of cationic surfactant benzalkonium chloride which was followed by the transplantation of NLBs in a fibrin matrix. After 4 weeks, grafted human cells were visualized by combined in situ hybridization (Alu) and immunohistochemistry (PGP9.5, GFAP, SMA). In addition, we determined nitric oxide synthase (NOS)-positive neurons and measured hypertrophic effects in the ENS and musculature. Contractility of treated guts was assessed in organ bath after electrical field stimulation. NLBs could be reproducibly generated without any signs of chromosomal alterations using subtelomere FISH. NLB-derived cells integrated within the host tissue and showed expected differentiated phenotypes i.e. enteric neurons, glia and smooth muscle-like cells following in vivo transplantation. Our data suggest biological effects of the transplanted NLB cells on tissue contractility, although robust statistical results could not be obtained due to the small sample size. Further, it is unclear, which of the NLB cell types including neural progenitors have direct restoring effects or, alternatively may act via ‘bystander’ mechanisms in vivo. Our findings provide further evidence that NLB transplantation can be considered as feasible tool to improve ENS function in a variety of gastrointestinal disorders.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis outcomes and meiotic segregation analysis of robertsonian translocation carriers

To investigate the meiotic segregation patterns of cleavage-stage embryos from robertsonian translocation carriers and aneuploidy of chromosome 18 according to meiotic segregation patterns. Retrospective study. Infertility center and laboratory of reproductive biology and infertility. Sixty-two couples with robertsonian translocation carriers. One blastomere was biopsied from embryos and diagnosed with the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Translocation chromosomes were analyzed with the use of locus-specific and subtelomeric FISH probes. Aneuploidy of chromosome 18 was assessed simultaneously with translocation chromosomes. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) outcomes, meiotic segregation patterns of robertsonian translocation, and aneuploidy of chromosome 18 depending on meiotic segregation patterns. Two hundred seventy embryos of 332 transferrable embryos were transferred in 113 cycles, and 27 healthy babies were born. The alternate segregation was significantly higher in male carriers than in female carriers (43.9% vs. 29.9%, respectively), and adjacent segregation was higher in female carriers than in male carriers (44.7% vs. 38.7%, respectively). Aneuploidy of chromosome 18 was significantly increased in 3:0-segregated or chaotic embryos. Forty-seven alternate embryos were excluded from embryo replacement owing to aneuploidy of chromosome18. In carriers of robertsonian translocation, meiotic segregation showed differences between men and women. Frequent meiotic errors caused by premature predivision or nondisjunction and less stringent checkpoint in women might cause such differences between sexes. Aneuploidy of chromosome 18 might be influenced by meiotic segregation of translocation chromosomes. Factors that cause malsegregation, such as 3:0 or chaotic segregation, seem to play a role in aneuploidy of chromosome18.

Combined use of molecular cytogenetic techniques to detect a small chromosomal translocation

Comprehensive use of molecular cytogenetic techniques for the detection of 1 case of small chromosome translocation. Following conventional chromosome preparation, G-banding karyotype analysis, spectral karyotyping (SKY), whole chromosome painting, two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and subtelomeric probe FISH were performed. G-banded karyotype was 46, XX, ?(22q11.3), SKY karyotype analysis was 46, XX, der (4)t(4;6) and found no abnormalities on chromosome 22, staining signal was not found with any abnormalities on chromosome 6. Two-color FISH indicated a chromosomal translocation segment of 22q13.3 to one end of the short arm of chromosome 4. Subtelomeric FISH probe showed the end of the long arm of chromosome 22 and the end of the short arm of chromosome 4 reciprocal translocation. High resolution G-banding and FISH result indicated 46, XX, t(4;22)(p15.3;q13.2). The testing of small chromosomal translocation should be combined with clinical information and integrated use of molecular cytogenetic techniques to improve the accuracy of diagnosis of chromosomal diseases.

Recurrent interstitial 1p36 deletions: Evidence for germline mosaicism and complex rearrangement breakpoints

Deletions of chromosome 1p36 are one of the most frequently encountered subtelomeric alterations. Clinical features of monosomy 1p36 include neurocognitive impairment, hearing loss, seizures, cardiac defects, and characteristic facial features. The majority of cases have occurred sporadically, implying that genomic instability plays a role in the prevalence of the syndrome. Here, we report two siblings with mild phenotypic features of the deletion syndrome, including developmental delay, hearing loss, and left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC). Microarray analysis using bacterial artificial chromosome and oligonucleotide microarrays indicated the deletions were identical, suggesting germline mosaicism. Parental phenotypes were normal, and analysis by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) did not show mosaicism. These small interstitial deletions were not detectable by conventional subtelomeric FISH analysis. To investigate the mechanism of deletion further, the breakpoints were cloned and sequenced, demonstrating the presence of a complex rearrangement. Sequence analysis of genes in the deletion interval did not reveal any mutations on the intact homologue that may have contributed to the LVNC seen in both children. This is the first report of apparent germline mosaicism for this disorder. Thus, our findings have important implications for diagnostic approaches and for recurrence risk counseling in families with a child with monosomy 1p36. In addition, our results further refine the minimal critical region for LVNC and hearing loss.

Update on “Two Siblings With Alternate Unbalanced Recombinants Derived From a Large Cryptic Maternal Pericentric Inversion of Chromosome 20”

Two brothers, with dissimilar clinical features, were each found to have different abnormalities of chromosome 20 by subtelomere fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The proband had deletion of 20p subtelomere and duplication of 20q subtelomere, while his brother was found to have a duplication of 20p subtelomere and deletion of 20q subtelomere. Parental cytogenetic studies were initially thought to be normal, both by G-banding and by subtelomere FISH analysis. Since chromosome 20 is a metacentric chromosome and an inversion was suspected, we used anchored FISH to assist in identifying a possible inversion. This approach employed concomitant hybridization of a FISH probe to the short (p) arm of chromosome 20 with the 20q subtelomere probe. We identified a cytogenetically non-visible, mosaic pericentric inversion of one of the maternal chromosome 20 homologs, providing a mechanistic explanation for the chromosomal abnormalities present in these brothers. Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) with both a custom-made BAC and cosmid-based subtelomere specific array (TEL array) and a commercially available SNP-based array confirmed and further characterized these rearrangements, identifying this as the largest pericentric inversion of chromosome 20 described to date. TEL array data indicate that the 20p breakpoint is defined by BAC RP11-978M13, approximately 900 kb from the pter; SNP array data reveal this breakpoint to occur within BAC RP11-978M13. The 20q breakpoint is defined by BAC RP11-93B14, approximately 1.7 Mb from the qter, by TEL array; SNP array data refine this breakpoint to within a gap between BACs on the TEL array (i.e., between RP11-93B14 and proximal BAC RP11-765G16).

Two siblings with alternate unbalanced recombinants derived from a large cryptic maternal pericentric inversion of chromosome 20

Two brothers, with dissimilar clinical features, were each found to have different abnormalities of chromosome 20 by subtelomere fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The proband had deletion of 20p subtelomere and duplication of 20q subtelomere, while his brother was found to have a duplication of 20p subtelomere and deletion of 20q subtelomere. Parental cytogenetic studies were initially thought to be normal, both by G-banding and by subtelomere FISH analysis. Since chromosome 20 is a metacentric chromosome and an inversion was suspected, we used anchored FISH to assist in identifying a possible inversion. This approach employed concomitant hybridization of a FISH probe to the short (p) arm of chromosome 20 with the 20q subtelomere probe. We identified a cytogenetically non-visible, mosaic pericentric inversion of one of the maternal chromosome 20 homologs, providing a mechanistic explanation for the chromosomal abnormalities present in these brothers. Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) with both a custom-made BAC and cosmid-based subtelomere specific array (TEL array) and a commercially available SNP-based array confirmed and further characterized these rearrangements, identifying this as the largest pericentric inversion of chromosome 20 described to date. TEL array data indicate that the 20p breakpoint is defined by BAC RP11-978M13, approximately 900 kb from the pter; SNP array data reveal this breakpoint to occur within BAC RP11-978M13. The 20q breakpoint is defined by BAC RP11-93B14, approximately 1.7 Mb from the qter, by TEL array; SNP array data refine this breakpoint to within a gap between BACs on the TEL array (i.e., between RP11-93B14 and proximal BAC RP11-765G16).

The use of array-CGH in a cohort of Greek children with developmental delay

BackgroundThe genetic diagnosis of mental retardation (MR) is difficult to establish and at present many cases remain undiagnosed and unexplained. Standard karyotyping has been used as one of the routine techniques for the last decades. The implementation of Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (array-CGH) has enabled the analysis of copy number variants (CNVs) with high resolution. Major cohort studies attribute 11% of patients with unexplained mental retardation to clinically significant CNVs. Here we report the use of array-CGH for the first time in a Greek cohort. A total of 82 children of Greek origin with mean age 4.9 years were analysed in the present study. Patients with visible cytogenetic abnormalities ascertained by standard karyotyping as well as those with subtelomeric abnormalities determined by Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) or subtelomeric FISH had been excluded.ResultsFourteen CNVs were detected in the studied patients. In nine patients (11%) the chromosomal aberrations were inherited from one of the parents. One patients showed two duplications, a 550 kb duplication in 3p14.1 inherited from the father and a ~1.1 Mb duplication in (22)(q13.1q13.2) inherited from the mother. Although both parents were phenotypically normal, it cannot be excluded that the dual duplication is causative for the patient's clinical profile including dysmorphic features and severe developmental delay. Furthermore, three de novo clinically significant CNVs were detected (3.7%). There was a ~6 Mb triplication of 18q21.1 in a girl 5 years of age with moderate MR and mild dysmorphic features and a ~4.8 Mb duplication at (10)(q11.1q11.21) in a 2 years old boy with severe MR, multiple congenital anomalies, severe central hypotonia, and ataxia. Finally, in a 3 year-old girl with microcephaly and severe hypotonia a deletion in (2)(q31.2q31.3) of about ~3.9 Mb was discovered. All CNVs were confirmed by Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). For the remaining 9 patients the detected CNVs (inherited duplications or deletions of 80 kb to 800 kb in size) were probably not associated with the clinical findings.ConclusionsGenomic microarrays have within the recent years proven to be a highly useful tool in the investigation of unexplained MR. The cohorts reported so far agree on an around 11% diagnostic yield of clinically significant CNVs in patients with unexplained MR. Various publicly available databases have been created for the interpretation of identified CNVs and parents are analyzed in case a rare CNV is identified in the child. We have conducted a study of Greek patients with unexplained MR and confirmed the high diagnostic value of the previous studies. It is important that the technique becomes available also in less developed countries when the cost of consumables will be reduced.

Masked complex chromosome rearrangement in a child thought to have del(8qter) as the sole cytogenetic abnormality

Cytogenetic analyses of constitutional diseases have disclosed several chromosomal rearrangements. At the molecular level, these rearrangements often result in the breakage of genes or alteration of genome architecture. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and molecular investigations of a patient showing hypotonia and dysmorphic traits revealed a masked complex chromosome abnormality previously detected by G-banding as a simple 8qter deletion. To characterize the genetic rearrangements panels of bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) covering 8q24.22→qter were constructed, and short tandem repeats (STRs) were used to refine the localization of the breakpoints and to assess the parental origin of the defect. Chromosome 8 displayed the breakpoint at 8q24.22 and an unexpected distal breakpoint at 8q24.23 resulting in unbalanced translocation of a small 8q genomic region on the chromosome 16qter. The study of the 16qter region revealed that the 16q subtelomere was retained and the translocated material of distal 8q was juxtaposed. Moreover, molecular analyses showed that part of the translocated 8qter segment on der(16) was partially duplicated, inverted and that the rearrangement arose in the paternal meiosis. These findings emphasize the complexity of some only apparently simple chromosomal rearrangements and suggest a subtelomeric FISH approach to enhance diagnostic care when a cytogenetic terminal deletion is found.

Screening of Subtelomeric Rearrangements in 100 Korean Pediatric Patients with Unexplained Mental Retardation and Anomalies Using Subtelomeric FISH (Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization)

Rearrangements of the subtelomeric regions of chromosomes account for a significant proportion of the underlying genetic defects in both idiopathic mental retardation (MR) and multiple congenital anomalies. To detect the rearrangements, a set of subtelomeric fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes has been developed. The aim of this study was to reveal the frequency of subtelomeric rearrangements in Korean patients with MR or multiple anomalies. We performed a FISH study using a commercially available subtelomeric FISH probes on a series of unrelated Korean pediatric patients with MR or multiple anomalies without identifiable causes. We used a checklist to evaluate the developmental delay and/or MR. Patients who were shown to have chromosome abnormalities, metabolic disorders, or recognizable dysmorphic syndromes by clinical and laboratory findings were excluded. As a result, 100 patients were eligible for the Subtelomeric FISH study, and a total of 29 patients (29%) were suspected to have subtelomeric rearrangements on initial screening by the multiprobe FISH kit. Among theses, confirmatory FISH studies by using single locus-specific FISH probes were performed in 24 patients. One patient (a 10-yr-old girl) was confirmed to have rearrangement, deletion of the telomeric portion of the short arm of chromosome 4 (4p). Her clinical manifestation was compatible with Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome, which is known to be caused by 4p deletion. The frequency of subtelomeric rearrangements in this study was 1.1% (1/95), lower than those previously reported (0.5-16.3%). We suggest that subtelomeric FISH test is a useful screening tool for patients with idiopathic MR and/or dysmorphism regardless of its false positive value.

22q11.2 Distal Deletion: A Recurrent Genomic Disorder Distinct from DiGeorge Syndrome and Velocardiofacial Syndrome

Microdeletions within chromosome 22q11.2 cause a variable phenotype, including DiGeorge syndrome (DGS) and velocardiofacial syndrome (VCFS). About 97% of patients with DGS/VCFS have either a common recurrent approximately 3 Mb deletion or a smaller, less common, approximately 1.5 Mb nested deletion. Both deletions apparently occur as a result of homologous recombination between nonallelic flanking low-copy repeat (LCR) sequences located in 22q11.2. Interestingly, although eight different LCRs are located in proximal 22q, only a few cases of atypical deletions utilizing alternative LCRs have been described. Using array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis, we have detected six unrelated cases of deletions that are within 22q11.2 and are located distal to the approximately 3 Mb common deletion region. Further analyses revealed that the rearrangements had clustered breakpoints and either a approximately 1.4 Mb or approximately 2.1 Mb recurrent deletion flanked proximally by LCR22-4 and distally by either LCR22-5 or LCR22-6, respectively. Parental fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses revealed that none of the available parents (11 out of 12 were available) had the deletion, indicating de novo events. All patients presented with characteristic facial dysmorphic features. A history of prematurity, prenatal and postnatal growth delay, developmental delay, and mild skeletal abnormalities was prevalent among the patients. Two patients were found to have a cardiovascular malformation, one had truncus arteriosus, and another had a bicuspid aortic valve. A single patient had a cleft palate. We conclude that distal deletions of chromosome 22q11.2 between LCR22-4 and LCR22-6, although they share some characteristic features with DGS/VCFS, represent a novel genomic disorder distinct genomically and clinically from the well-known DGS/VCF deletion syndromes.

Comprehensive analysis of Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome using array CGH indicates a high prevalence of translocations

Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) is caused by deletions involving chromosome region 4p16.3. The minimal diagnostic criteria include mild-to-severe mental retardation, hypotonia, growth delay and a distinctive facial appearance. Variable manifestations include feeding difficulties, seizures and major congenital anomalies. Clinical variation may be explained by variation in the size of the deletion. However, in addition to having a deletion involving 4p16.3, previous studies indicate that approximately 15% of WHS patients are also duplicated for another chromosome region due to an unbalanced translocation. It is likely that the prevalence of unbalanced translocations resulting in WHS is underestimated since they can be missed using conventional chromosome analyses such as karyotyping and WHS-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Therefore, we hypothesized that some of the clinical variation may be due to an unrecognized and unbalanced translocation. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is a new technology that can analyze the entire genome at a significantly higher resolution over conventional cytogenetics to characterize unbalanced rearrangements. We used aCGH to analyze 33 patients with WHS and found a much higher than expected frequency of unbalanced translocations (15/33, 45%). Seven of these 15 cases were cryptic translocations not detected by a previous karyotype combined with WHS-specific FISH. Three of these 15 cases had an unbalanced translocation involving the short arm of an acrocentric chromosome and were not detected by either aCGH or subtelomere FISH. Analysis of clinical manifestations of each patient also revealed that patients with an unbalanced translocation often presented with exceptions to some expected phenotypes.

The clinical utility of enhanced subtelomeric coverage in array CGH

Telomeric chromosome abnormalities are a substantial cause of mental retardation and birth defects. Although subtelomeric fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes have been widely used to identify submicroscopic telomeric rearrangements, array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) has emerged as a more efficient and comprehensive detection method. Due to the clinical relevance of telomeric abnormalities, it has been proposed that array CGH using panels of BAC clones that map to regularly spaced intervals along the length of each telomere could be used to characterize subtelomeric aberrations more precisely in a single experiment. We have added 1,120 FISH-mapped BAC clones to our microarray to enhance the coverage of the 41 unique human subtelomeric regions. Contigs of clones were selected in increments of approximately 0.5 Mb beginning with the most distal unique sequence for each subtelomere and extending on average approximately 5.7 Mb toward the centromere. We have used this microarray to characterize 169 clinically significant subtelomeric abnormalities identified out of nearly 7,000 consecutive clinical cases analyzed by array CGH in our diagnostic laboratory. The expanded telomere coverage was sufficient to define the breakpoints of over half (56%) of the chromosome abnormalities. However, 44% of the subtelomeric aberrations extended beyond the size of this expanded coverage suggesting that many subtelomeric abnormalities are >5 Mb in size and that greater representation may be of even more value. In addition to identifying 6 cases of complex rearrangements, we have identified 42 cases of interstitial deletions that would have been missed by subtelomere FISH panels that use a single clone to the most distal unique sequence for each region. Microarrays designed to investigate regions known to be involved in chromosome abnormalities will enhance the detection of cytogenetic abnormalities at unprecedented resolution and frequency.

Subtelomeric chromosome aberrations: still a lot to learn

Subtelomeric chromosome aberrations: still a lot to learn.Cryptic subtelomeric chromosome aberrations are a significant cause of mental retardation (MR). More than 4000 patients have been investigated, and the mean overall prevalence of subtelomeric rearrangements has been found to be 5.2%. In order to contribute to knowledge on the clinical presentation of subtelomeric rearrangements, we retrospectively studied patients with unexplained MR who had been evaluated for subtelomeric abnormalities by different fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques. Hundred and two patients had an unexplained combination of MR with dysmorphism, congenital anomalies, and/or a positive family history and were investigated by total subtelomeric (TS) FISH (89/102), or by total painting (TP) in an obligate carrier in the case of familial MR (13/102). In 59 additional patients, a sequence-specific FISH was performed on clinical indication. In the 102 patients studied by TS or TP, six pathogenic aberrations (5.9%) were found in addition to one polymorphism. In total, eight clinically significant subtelomeric aberrations were found in the 161 index patients; four of these eight aberrations were familial. We report on the clinical presentation of all patients with an aberration and review the relevant literature. Factors complicating the interpretation of subtelomeric rearrangements are discussed, such as the occurrence of variants, clinical variability, and limited knowledge of the phenotype.

An unusual reciprocal translocation detected by subtelomeric FISH: Interstitial and not terminal

An 11-month-old boy with a pattern of dysmorphic signs, an atrial septal defect, right inguinal hernia, bilateral undescended testes, bilateral urinary reflux, right renal dysplasia, and developmental delay had an abnormal chromosome 11 with additional material of unknown origin attached to the long arm in his karyotype. The paternal karyotype was normal 46,XY, while the mother's karyotype was 46,XX,t(2;11)(q35;q24.2). Thus, a reciprocal terminal exchange was assumed resulting in duplication of distal 2q material and a small subterminal 11q deletion. However, application of subtelomeric fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes indicated that the translocation was not a terminal reciprocal exchange, but was interstitial at least for one of the chromosomes, which would be highly unusual since most interstitial translocations are non-reciprocal. Based on the results of FISH and microsatellite marker examinations, the designation of the breakpoints and thus of the deleted and duplicated segments had to be revised. The findings have implications for karyotype-phenotype correlation.

Molecular and cytogenetic characterization of a novel rearrangement involving chromosomes 9, 12, and 17 resulting in ETV6 (TEL) and ABL fusion

We performed chromosome analysis on the bone marrow of a patient with BCR/ABL negative chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). By interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), an extra ABL signal was present in interphase nuclei and appeared to be located at 17p in the metaphase cells. Chromosome analysis showed a subtle abnormality at 17p13 and 12p13 but no visible rearrangement at 9q34 ( ABL). Additional FISH experiments disclosed a rearrangement between the short arms of chromosomes 12 and 17 at approximately bands 12p13 and 17p13, respectively. In addition, subtelomeric FISH analysis confirmed the presence of terminal 12p at 17p13 and showed terminal 9q34 to be intact on each chromosome 9. Taken together, these results indicated a rearrangement involving chromosomes 9, 12, and 17 that suggested the possibility of juxtaposition of part of the ETV6 (also known as TEL) locus (12p13) with a portion of ABL (9q34) together at 17p13. The ETV6/ABL fusion was confirmed by RT-PCR, which showed that the first 5 exons of ETV6 were fused in frame with ABL at exon 2. Wild-type ETV6 and ABL were also expressed, in accordance with the FISH results that showed no loss of the second ETV6 or ABL allele.

Subtelomeric rearrangements in the mentally retarded: A comparison of detection methods

In recent years, subtelomeric rearrangements, e.g., chromosome deletions or duplications too small to be detected by conventional cytogenetic analysis, have emerged as a significant cause of both idiopathic and familial mental retardation. As mental retardation is a common disorder, many patients need to be tested on a routine basis. In this review, we will discuss the different methods that have been applied in laboratories worldwide, including multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), multiallelic marker analysis, multiplex amplifiable probe hybridization (MAPH), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), quantitative real-time PCR, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), and multicolor FISH, including spectral karyotyping (SKY), subtelomeric combined binary ratio labeling FISH (S-COBRA FISH), multiplex FISH telomere integrity assay (M-TEL), telomeric multiplex FISH (TM-FISH), and primed in situ labeling (PRINS).

Molecular delineation of deletions on 2q37.3 in three cases with an Albright hereditary osteodystrophy‐like phenotype

A minority of the reported cases of terminal 2q37 deletion clinically resemble Albright hereditary osteodystrophy (AHO)/pseudopseudohypoparathyroidism and have only mild-to-moderate mental retardation. Our molecular and cytogenetic fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) findings on an additional three patients further reduce the size of the minimal critical region deleted in this syndrome to about 3 Mb. This region includes the G-protein-coupled receptor 35 (GPR35), glypican 1 (GPC1), and serine/threonine protein kinase 25 (STK25) genes on 2q37.3. We have further defined several polymorphic variants within the coding region and flanking regions of GPR35 gene, which could potentially be useful for rapid detection of GPR35 gene deletion. We postulate that the absence of GPR35 may, at least partly, account for the phenotypic resemblance to the AHO. We also believe that the deletion of GPR35 could be responsible for the entity brachydactyly mental retardation syndrome (OMIM #600430), which was coined based on the above minority of patients with terminal 2q37 deletion. We recommend that every patient with AHO phenotype should undergo 2q subtelomeric FISH screen and subsequently a molecular study on the GPR35 gene. GPC1 and/or STK25 haploinsufficiency may also contribute to the AHO-like phenotype.

6q subtelomeric deletion: is there a recognizable syndrome?

We report on a girl with an abnormal hybridization pattern for the subtelomeric fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) probe panel showing deletion of the long arm telomeric region of chromosome 6. All other subtelomere DNA probes showed normal hybridization patterns. Metaphase cells analysed from cultures of peripheral blood revealed a normal female chromosome complement at the 650-band level. The deletion was further characterized using genomic microarray analysis. Clinical findings include: developmental delay, seizures, hypoplasia of the corpus callosum, dextrocardia, unusual dimpling of knees and elbows, and minor anomalies. We are aware of only two other reports of isolated cryptic 6q subtelomeric deletions not associated with other chromosomal abnormalities. The absence of retinal abnormalities in our case supports the theory that genes responsible for the retinal abnormalities in other terminal 6q deletions are proximal to 6q27. Subtelomeric FISH probes were useful in establishing a diagnosis in our patient. As more cases are reported, we may be able to establish discrete phenotypes and natural histories that can aid in counselling families.