Subtalar Fusion Research Articles

Ilizarov fixator as salvage procedure after frustrating arthrodesis using intramedullary nailing - is there a chance of consolidation?

Arthrodesis of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints is a salvage procedure that has been used successfully for years. Treatment options include internal procedures and external procedures. Retrograde intramedullary nailing is considered a safe procedure with a high degree of stability and comfort. Nevertheless, there are cases in which this internal arthrodesis fails and another procedure must be considered. Ilizarov fixator treatment could be a solution for those patients in whom intramedullary nailing has failed. Even if it means another surgical revision - is it possible to finally achieve consolidation with this method? In this single-center, retrospective study all documents of patients who underwent tibiotalar and subtalar joints fusion using the Ilizarov external fixator at our institution from 2003 to 2023 as secondary treatment after frustrated first arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail were reviewed. Nineteen patients (17 men and 2 women), with an average age of 55.7 (standard deviation (SD) 8.7, range 34-75) years were included. On average, 1.7 (SD 1.3, range 1-6) arthrodesis attempt were performed before final Ilizarov fixator arthrodesis. The average time spent in the Ilizarov fixator was 19 (SD 4, range 14-29) weeks. In seven cases (36.8%), both the tibiotalar and subtalar joints received bony consolidation in the end. If patients have undergone fusion of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints with a retrograde nail and this fails, it is difficult to achieve complete consolidation in the further course. A further attempt at arthrodesis using an Ilizarov fixator is possible, but the overall results are also poor. This procedure must therefore be seen as a last resort before amputation.

Change in Talar Axial Rotation and Pain Intensity Following Correction of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.

The talus is more internally rotated within the ankle mortise in progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) patients. However, no studies have investigated the change in talar axial rotation (AR) in PCFD postoperatively. The primary aim was to investigate the change in talar AR following PCFD reconstruction. Secondary aims were to determine whether talar AR changes were associated with other radiographic measurements or specific procedures, and whether postoperative talar AR was associated with 2-year patient-reported outcome scores. Twenty-seven patients older than 18 years who underwent flexible PCFD reconstruction with preoperative and at least 5-month postoperative weightbearing computed tomographic (WBCT) scans and radiographs and had preoperative and at least 2-year postoperative PROMIS scores were included. Patients with talonavicular fusions were excluded. Talar AR was the angle between the transmalleolar axis and talar axis on WBCT scans, with smaller angles representing more internal rotation as described by Kim et al. Hindfoot moment arm, Meary angle, fibulocalcaneal and talocalcaneal distance, subtalar middle facet uncoverage, and talonavicular angle were measured on radiographs. Postoperative talar AR was 49.7 degrees (IQR, 45.9, 57.3), which was more externally rotated than preoperative AR by a median of 8.3 degrees (IQR, 2.2, 15.7) (P > .001). The change in talar AR was not associated with changes in any radiographic parameter. Increasing external talar AR was associated with an increase in postoperative PROMIS pain intensity (rs = 0.38, 95% CI 0.00, 0.67). Lateral column lengthening and subtalar fusion procedures were not associated with changes in talar AR (P > .10). PCFD reconstruction results in external rotation of the talus within the ankle mortise. Kim et al found that control patients had approximately 40 to 60 degrees of talar AR, which is similar to this study's corrected position of the talus. However, increasing talar external rotation resulted in worse postoperative PROMIS pain intensity, suggesting the possibility of overcorrecting the internal AR deformity.

Outcomes of cobalt-chrome 3D-printed total talus replacement with and without combined total ankle replacement

BackgroundCollapse of the talus and peri-talar arthritis pose treatment challenges due to the anatomy and location of the talus as a keystone of the foot and ankle. Custom 3D-printed total talus replacement (TTR) and combined total ankle total talus replacement (TATTR) have emerged as treatment options for these pathologies. However, the safety and efficacy of these implants is unknown due to the limited number of cases and short follow-up durations. MethodsThis was a retrospective study to assess surgical outcomes of patients who underwent a TTR and TATTR with or without subtalar fusion. Patient demographics, intraoperative parameters, device related surgical and non-surgical events, imaging and clinical evaluations, and patient reported outcome (PRO) measures were compiled. ResultsA total of 38 patients received a custom 3D-printed implant with mean follow-up time of 22.1 (range: 12–45) months. In this cohort, 7 (18.4 %) required secondary surgery and 3 (7.9 %) required implant removal. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that patient diagnosis of depression was a significant predictor of secondary surgery with an OR 17.50 (p = 0.037). Significant postoperative improvements were observed in the talocalcaneal height (p = 0.005) and talar declination angle (p = 0.013) for the TATTR group. VAS and PROMIS pain interference (PI) scores demonstrated an initial significant improvement in pain, but this improvement did not maintain significance at most recent follow-up. However, there was a significant increase in the PROMIS physical function (PF) scores (p = 0.037) at most recent follow-up. ConclusionThese results demonstrate that TTR and TATTR provide significant improvement in post-operative radiographic foot and ankle alignment and physical function at the two-year timepoint. PRO findings suggest that patients are more active after surgery. Surgeons considering proceeding with either of these procedures should counsel patients about pain and functional outcomes as well as realistic expectations in patients with depression. Level of evidenceLevel 3

Five-Year Results of the Salto XT Revision Ankle Arthroplasty.

The treatment of failed ankle replacements is debated, and little is published about the medium- and long-term results of revision implants. We wanted to examine prosthesis survival and physical function at least 5 years after insertion of the Salto XT revision prosthesis. All consecutive patients operated with a Salto XT revision prosthesis underwent clinical and radiologic examinations preoperatively and after 3, 12, 24, and 60 months. Complications and reoperations are described, and changes in patient-reported outcome measures and clinical scores are reported. Thirty patients were operated with a Salto XT revision prosthesis between March 2014 and March 2017. Three of these were revised (1 to a fusion and 2 to a new prosthesis), and 3 patients were reoperated with screw removal. A concurrent subtalar fusion was performed on 13 patients, and there was 1 case of likely nonunion after these procedures, but no reoperations. The mean AOFAS score increased from 39.2 (95% CI 30.8-47.5) preoperatively to 75.1 (95% CI 67.3-82.9) after 5 years, and the mean improvement was 34.2 points (95% CI 23.8-44.6). Mean EQ-5D increased from 0.36 (95% CI 0.30-0.42) preoperatively to 0.74 (95% CI 0.64-0.85) after 5 years, an improvement of 0.34 (95% CI 0.19-0.49). Radiolucent lines were present in all but 3 patients. Five-year prosthesis survival was 93% (83.6-100). This is the first study to present medium-term results of this implant. We found good improvement in outcome scores and good implant survival, but also a high prevalence of radiolucent lines.

Compressive Strength of Midfoot Fusion Nail vs Midfoot Fusion Bolt and Role of Subtalar Fusion in Midfoot Charcot Fixation Model.

Operative management of midfoot Charcot arthropathy often involves an extended midfoot arthrodesis with intramedullary bolts for fixation, a method called "beaming." Recently intramedullary nails have been introduced for the same indication, presumably providing stronger fixation. This study compares midfoot fusion nails to bolts with regard to stiffness and compressive ability. Additionally, we assessed how the addition of a subtalar fusion affects the construct. Medial column fusions were performed on 10 matched cadaver foot specimens with either a midfoot fusion nail or bolt. Specimens underwent cyclical compression loading, and displacement was measured. Separately, compressive forces produced were compared between the 2 fixation constructs using a synthetic bone block model. Lastly, another 10 matched specimens with midfoot fusion nails were evaluated with or without subtalar fusions. No differences in stiffness were found in comparing matched specimens between nail vs bolt or comparing nail only without subtalar fusion (STF) vs nail with STF. The compressive force produced by the nail specimens was significantly and substantially greater than the bolted specimens (751.7 vs 139.0 N, P = .01). The accumulated height drop at the midfoot after cycling was 0.5 mm more in the nail group than in the bolt group (1.72 vs 1.22 mm, P = .008). The nail with STF group had greater initial height drop at the midfoot than the nail-only group (0.68 vs 0.34 mm, P = .035) with similar initial height drop at the ankle. However, there were no differences in strength among the matched pairs of midfoot nail-only vs midfoot nail with STF as measured by displacement after fatigue or maximum force at load to failure. The overall cadaveric comparisons between matched pairs of nails vs bolts, and nail-only vs nail with STF, did not provide noteworthy differences between the groups with regard to strength or stiffness. However, the compressive force of the midfoot fusion nail was far superior to the bolt in a synthetic bone model. These data provide valuable insight comparing implants used in Charcot midfoot arthrodesis.

Minimally invasive technique for acute fixation and subtalar fusion of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures.

Displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures (DIACFs) are difficult injuries to treat and are often encountered by orthopedic surgeons. For DIACFs treated nonoperatively or with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), a common complication is painful subtalar arthritis and the need for a secondary subtalar fusion, which prolongs the overall recovery time. One treatment option to address this sequela involves ORIF with subtalar fusion as the primary treatment. We describe a reproducible, minimally invasive surgical technique for primary ORIF with subtalar fusion when the calcaneal tuberosity is amendable to cannulated screw fixation to treat these complex calcaneal fractures. Our technique offers advantages compared to other techniques in that it avoids screw traffic, allows easy bony compression of the subtalar joint, and minimizes soft tissue damage via percutaneous screw fixation. Fourteen fractured calcanei in 12 patients underwent our technique and all achieved bony union with a median time to fusion of 107.5days (range, 54-530days). Eight patients returned to work with the remaining 4 patients having an unknown work status at last follow-up, although 2 of these 4 patients resumed normal activities. Only 1 patient experienced a complication, which was an infection after achieving bony union, and was treated with successful hardware removal and our infection protocol. Overall, we conclude our surgical technique offers a successful option in the treatment of DIACFs when the calcaneal tuberosity is amendable to cannulated screw fixation.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of ankle joint preserving surgical reconstruction for talar neck non-unions–A series of 8 cases

BackgroundTalar neck non-unions result in significant hindfoot deformity and morbidity and are infrequently reported in the literature. The optimal surgical management for this condition is evolving, with various authors reporting the results of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with bone grafting (BG), ankle fusion and modified Blair fusion. We performed this study to report the clinical and radiological outcomes of a cohort of talar neck non-unions managed by ankle joint preserving reconstruction. MethodsThis was an ambispective study which included 8 patients (7 male and 1 female) with talar neck non-unions. All patients underwent ORIF+BG through dual approaches. Additional medial malleolar osteotomy was done in 2 cases, and calcaneofibular split approach to the subtalar joint in 3. Adjunct subtalar fusion was done in 5 cases. Clinical and radiological evaluation was performed pre- and post-operatively. Functional outcomes were assessed by the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ). ResultsThe mean age of patients 32.3 ± 13.1 years. The mean surgical delay was 4.1 ± 1.7 months. As per Zwipp and Rammelt classification of post-traumatic talar deformities, 5 cases were classified as Type 3, 2 were Type 4, and 1 was Type 1. Union was achieved in 7 cases at a mean of 3.4 ± 1.3 months. One case had progressive collapse, which was managed by pantalar arthrodesis. All 3 cases where subtalar fusion was not performed primarily demonstrated subtalar arthrosis, but none required a secondary subtalar fusion. The MOxFQ score from 61.1 ± 10.1 to 41 ± 14.1 postoperatively (P = 0.005). The mean follow-up was 14.6 ± 6.8 months. ConclusionORIF+BG of the talar neck, with or without subtalar fusion has the potential to achieve solid union, correct the hindfoot deformity and improve functional outcomes. However, larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of this procedure.

Medical Malpractice Litigation Following Hindfoot Arthrodesis

Given high patient expectations in the setting of complex surgeries, orthopedic surgeons are at risk of being subject to malpractice claims which can impose significant economic and psychological burden. This study investigates malpractice claims against orthopedic surgeons and podiatrists performing hindfoot arthrodesis and determine factors associated with plaintiff verdicts and settlements using the Westlaw legal database. The database was queried for all cases involving hindfoot arthrodesis using the terms “malpractice” and either “ankle fusion,” “arthrodesis,” “subtalar fusion,” “tibiotalar fusion,” “tibiotalocalcaneal fusion,” “TTC fusion,” or “tibiofibular fusion” from 1987 to 2023. Data regarding patient demographics, causes cited for litigation, case outcomes, and indemnity settlements were collected. Cases were excluded if the defendant was not an orthopedic surgeon or a podiatrist, the procedure involved was not a hindfoot arthrodesis, or if the patient was a minor. Forty-five cases of hindfoot arthrodesis met the inclusion criteria. The mean plaintiff age was 51.5 ± 13.8 years with 51.1% male. Thirty-three cases (73%) were in favor of the defendant, with an average inflation-adjusted payout of $853,863 (±456,179). The most alleged category of negligence was procedural/intraoperative error (75%) followed by postsurgical error (38%) and failure to inform (31%). The most common specific damages included functional/ROM limitation (49%), need for additional surgery (47%), continuing/worsened pain (27%), and nonunion/malunion (29%). Given the frequency of hindfoot arthrodesis performed, this study highlights the importance of effective communication with patients concerning potential postoperative complications, prognosis of their injury, and risks and benefits associated with each treatment modality.

MULTICENTRE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY OF SUBTALAR ARTHRODESIS USING ALLOSTEM VERSUS AUTOLOGOUS BONE GRAFT

IntroductionAlloStem/Cellular Bone Allograft and autologous bone graft are accepted methods for managing hindfoot degenerative arthritis. The purpose was to evaluate outcomes of AlloStem and autograft in subtalar arthrodesis and compare overall fusion rates.MethodsThis study was conducted in IRB compliance. Patients between 18–80 years who qualified for a subtalar fusion were randomized 1:1 to AlloStem or autologous graft. The AOFAS hindfoot ankle scale, FFI-R and SF-12 were collected pre-operatively, 6 weeks, 3 & 6 months, 1 and 2 year. Weight-bearing 3-view ankle X-rays were done at the same intervals. A CT scan was obtained at 6 months.Results140 patients were enrolled; 124 patients had surgery(60-AlloStem and 64-Control). Withdrawals included 14 voluntarily before surgery and 2 intra-operative failures. 19 were lost to follow-up. Mean age for AlloStem was 56.69(20.3–79.6) and Autograft was 54.60(20.74–80.07). 59 AlloStem patients completed their 6 month visit and 45 completed 2 years. AOFAS score improved: 40.02 at pre-op to 72.16(6 mo) to 79.51 at 1 year and 80.38 at 2 year. SF-12 improved 58.29 at pre-op to 65.67 at 6 month and 71.59 at 2 year. FFI-R improved 236.88 at pre-op to 203.53 at 6 month 149.93 at 2 year.60 Autograft patients completed their 6 month visit and 51 patients completed their 2 year. AOFAS score improved 42.89 at pre-op to 75.67 (6 mo) to 79.75 at 1 year and 78.62 at 2 year. Autograft SF-12 improved 60.55 at pre-op to 70.40 at 6 month and 75.26 at 2 year. Autograft FFI-R improved 217.16 at pre-op to 166.77 at 6 month and 145.43 at 2 year. AlloStem patients had a mean posterior fusion rate of 28.9% at 6 months whereas the Autograft had 46.3%(p=.049). Non-union rates were AlloStem(9/57)(15.7%) whereas Autograft was 3/60(5%).ConclusionAlloStem trended to be inferior to Autologous graft.

Medial column fusion for degenerative pesplanovalgus deformity. Report of 9 patients.

Degenerative pesplanovalgus is a progressive disabling condition; there are more than one surgical procedure used in the treatment with varied outcomes. The aim of the current study is to highlight the benefits of the medial column fusion surgery in the treatment of this condition. Nine adult patients with rigid degenerative pesplanovalgus (without significant valgus heel deformity) underwent medial column fusion between January 2015 to December 2020. The procedure was combined with subtalar fusion in four patients and lateral column lengthening in one patient. The mean follow-up period was 19.5 months (range, 15-27). Regular clinical and radiological reviews was carried out in the postoperative period. The mean Manchester Oxford foot score was good in 7 patients, and fair in two patients. The mean Meary angle was 5.8 ± 5.4° preoperatively and improved to 0.9 ± 7.7° at final follow-up, and the mean Pitch angle also improved from 12.5 ± 3.7° preoperatively to 23.2 ± 4.1° (P < .001). In a patient, and at a different stage, talo-navicular fusion was added to the medial column fusion.The outcome of this series of cases was encouraging and medial column fusion continues to be a good option in the management of rigid pesplanovalgus deformity.

Middle Facet Tarsal Coalition in a National Collegiate Athletic Association Basketball Athlete: An Exploration Clinical Case Report

The patient is a 22-year-old female basketball player initially diagnosed with a calcaneal fracture. Five months after the pain began, the patient was referred to a foot and ankle surgeon and diagnosed with middle facet tarsal coalition. The patient received one X-ray-guided subtalar steroid injection and two platelet-rich plasma injections to aid in pain relief while completing her senior year of collegiate basketball. She elected to end her senior season early to have the recommended subtalar fusion surgery. The surgery ended her basketball career but provided pain-free activities of daily living. This case presents unique components compared with available literature on how injury presentation in adult populations can complicate a timely and accurate initial diagnosis. This case is also unique because despite conservative efforts, a surgical fusion was required to optimize pain and function during activities of daily living.

Biomechanical Effects of Subtalar Joint Fusion and Medial Ligament Reconstruction in Simulated Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the biomechanical effect of medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy (MDCO), subtalar joint fusion (SF), and medial ligament reconstruction (MLR: deltoid-spring ligament) in a severe flatfoot model. We hypothesized that (1) combination of MDCO and SF improves the tibiotalar and foot alignment in severe progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) cadaver model. (2) However, if a residual valgus heel alignment remains after MCDO and SF, it can lead to increased medial ligament strain, foot malalignment, and tibiotalar valgus tilt, which will be mitigated by the addition of MLR. Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric foot specimens were used to create a severe flatfoot model. The foot alignment changes, including the talo-first metatarsal angle in the axial and sagittal planes, subtalar angle, and tibiotalar angle in the coronal plane, were measured. The angles were measured at the initial condition, after creating the severe flatfoot model, and after each successive reconstructive procedure in the following order: (1) MDCO, (2) SF, and (3) MLR. Tibiotalar valgus tilt was decreased with the MDCO procedure: 4.4 vs 1.0 degrees (P = .04). Adding in situ SF to the MDCO led to increased tibiotalar tilt to 2.5 degrees was different from the initial condition (P = .01). Although the tibiotalar valgus tilt was significantly decreased after adding the MLR to the MDCO/SF procedure compared with the severe flatfoot model (0.8 vs 4.4 degrees, P = .03), no significant difference in the tibiotalar valgus tilt was observed between MDCO/SF and MDCO/SF with MLR. Our results demonstrated that MDCO significantly improved forefoot abduction and medial arch alignment, with no significant additional improvement observed with addition of SF. Following SF, a residual valgus heel alignment can contribute to subsequent tibiotalar valgus tilt. The addition of MLR did not show significantly decreased tibiotalar valgus tilt following SF. Residual valgus heel alignment after subtalar joint fusion in the surgical treatment of PCFD can lead to increased medial ligament strain. Although MLR might be considered for providing medial stability, it may not necessarily prevent the development of tibiotalar valgus tilt.

Midterm Results after Tibiotalar or Tibiotalocalcaneal Fusion Using an Ilizarov External Fixator.

Ankle fusion is considered a treatment of choice for end-stage ankle arthritis when a total ankle replacement procedure is not indicated. However, the potential risk of secondary arthritis in the adjacent joint after ankle fusion raises arguments on whether preserving the adjacent joint during an isolated tibiotalar (TT) fusion brings about any future benefits with regard to pain and gait discomfort. In this study, we intended to present midterm results following TT or tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion using an Ilizarov external fixator and to investigate whether spontaneous fusion occurred in the subtalar or midtarsal joint. This is a retrospective observational study. Medical records of patients who underwent TT or TTC fusion using an Ilizarov external fixator for substantial bone defects around the ankle joint between 1994 and 2018 were manually searched. Forty-one patients were included and the status of the joints adjacent to the fusion site was evaluated in radiographic examinations. Of the 34 patients who underwent TT fusion, 30 patients (88.3%) had a spontaneous fusion in the adjacent joints. Specifically, 11 patients (29.4%) had subtalar joint fusion and 19 patients (55.9%) had both midtarsal joint and subtalar joint fusion. In TTC fusion, the midtarsal joint was spontaneously fused in all 7 patients. In this study, we observed spontaneous adjacent joint fusion following TT or TTC fusion using an Ilizarov external fixator for substantial bone defects around the ankle joint. Although a careful approach should be made since patients treated in this study may not represent typical candidates that need primary joint-sacrificing procedures, we believe that this study may draw attention from surgeons concerned about the fate of the adjacent joint status after TT or TTC fusion.

Clinical outcomes following tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing combined with partial fibulectomy and onlay bone graft.

Although intramedullary nailing is a popular method for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis, nonunion is one of the most commonly reported complications. This study aimed to evaluate the fusion rate, improvement in functional outcomes, and occurrence of complications in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using retrograde intramedullary nailing with partial fibulectomy and onlay bone graft technique. Twenty-six consecutive patients using the proposed technique were retrospectively reviewed. For radiographic outcomes, the union rate, alignment, and any related complications were assessed. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society hindfoot scale, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, and visual analog scale, preoperatively and at the final follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 38.2months. The tibiotalar joint achieved complete union in 80.8% at six months postoperatively, while all the cases achieved complete union at 12months postoperatively. However, the subtalar joint achieved complete union in 26.9% at six months postoperatively, which gradually increased to 73.1% at 12months postoperatively, and 80.8% at the final follow-up without revision surgery. A subgroup analysis showed there was a trend of higher subtalar fusion rate when an additional screw for the subtalar joint fixation was placed (86.7% vs. 54.5%). The functional outcomes significantly improved at the final follow-up. A few minor complications occurred, including surgical site infection, irritational symptoms, and metal failure; however, they eventually resolved. Our technique of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with partial fibulectomy and onlay bone grafting could be a good option where both the tibiotalar and subtalar joints need to be fused.

Arthroscopy-assisted reduction and simultaneous robotic-assisted screw placement in the treatment of fractures of the posterior talar process.

A fracture of the posterior talar process is easily missed because of its hidden position. Inappropriate treatment is likely to result in complications, such as nonunion of the fracture and traumatic arthritis. This study evaluated the outcomes of arthroscopy-assisted reduction combined with robotic-assisted screw placement in the treatment of fractures of the posterior talar process. The clinical data for nine patients who underwent surgical treatment of a fracture of the posterior talar process at our institution between September 2017 and January 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Arthroscopy-assisted reduction of the fracture was performed, and a cannulated screw was placed using three-dimensional orthopedic robotic-assisted navigation. The patients (seven men, two women) had a mean age of 36.33 ± 9.77years and were followed up for 21 ± 5.43months. The operation time was 106.67 ± 24.5min with blood loss of 47.78 ± 9.05ml. Primary healing was obtained in all cases, and no patient sustained a nerve or tendon injury, had fracture nonunion, or developed talar osteonecrosis. One patient developed subtalar arthritis, for which subtalar joint fusion was performed; pain was markedly less severe after cleaning. Arthroscopy-assisted reduction and robotic-assisted screw placement have the advantages of visualization of fracture reduction, minimal injury, and precise screw placement in the treatment of fractures of the posterior talar process.

Subtalar Joint Fusion For STJ OA before vs after Total Ankle Replacement: Does it affect patient outcomes? – A 10 year follow up clinical study

Category: Ankle; Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: There is paucity of literature reporting outcomes in patients who undergo subtalar joint fusion surgery before vs. after having a Total Ankle Replacement (TAR). We aimed to study the PROMs in patients who underwent a staged approach of Subtalar arthrodesis (STJA) followed by TAR vs patients who underwent TAR followed by further STJA surgery. Methods: All patients who underwent a STJA surgery and TAR surgery (in either order) between 2006 and 2010 included in this study. patient reported outcomes including WOMAC (Western Ontario McMasters Osteoarthritis score), SF-36 general health score and patient satisfaction scores were compared between groups. They analysed pre-operatively and at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years post-operatively. Out of 210 TARs performed, 14 patients underwent a two staged procedure between 2006 and 2010 by a single surgeon. 5 patients had STJ fusion after TAR (Group A) and 9 patients had STJ fusion before TAR (Group B). Results: Mean age of Group A and B was 52.5 years and 62.1 years respectively. 1 patient in Group A and 3 patients in Group B were deceased. Both groups reported improvement in scores for WOMAC, SF -36 from pre-op to 1 year post operatively (p &lt; 0.05) and the results plateaued to 5 years with slight decline in scores from 5 to 10 years. At 2 years, Group B reported lower scores for stiffness (9.6±11.7 vs. 64.3 ±27.4) p=0.002, At 5 years, Group A reported lower scores than group B for General health and mental health components of SF-36 scores (p=0.044); however, there was no differences between groups for WOMAC, SF-36 and patient satisfaction outcomes at 10 years post-operatively. Conclusion: There were similar outcomes reported by patients who underwent STJA either before or after TAR at average of 10 year follow up in this series

Decreased Reoperation Rate with ABMP in Foot and Ankle Fusions

Category: Ankle; Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: A nonunion is a challenging clinic problem following foot and ankle arthrodeses. There is great interest in orthobiologics as surgical adjuvants. The purpose of this study is to compare three orthobiologics (PDGF-B agonist [PDGF-B], allograft bone morphogenetic protein [ABMP], crushed cancellous allograft [CC]) to determine if there is a difference in union rates following foot and ankle arthrodeses. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 258 feet (255 patients) with minimum 3-month follow-up, undergoing arthrodesis by a single fellowship-trained foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeon from 2016-2022. Patients underwent ankle, pantalar, triple, subtalar (ST), midfoot, or talonavicular fusion. Data collected included demographics, medical history, orthobiologics used, postoperative complications, readmission and reoperation rates. 83 (34.0%) cases used PDGF-B with CC, 32 (13.1%) used solely ABMP, 66 (27.0%) used ABMP with CC, and 63 (25.8%) used solely CC. Union was defined as bridging bone on three joint quadrants on AP and lateral radiographs, or greater than 50% bridging bone of the joint space on computed tomography (CT). Results: Of the 258 cases, the ST joint was most commonly fused (53.7%). Cases using ABMP had statistically significantly shorter mean time to fusion (ABMP=120.81 days, no ABMP=162.04 days). Patients treated with ABMP were also significantly less likely to undergo reoperation or removal of hardware. Between PDGF-B+CC and ABMP+CC groups, only reoperation rates differed significantly (PDGF-B+CC=26.5%, ABMP+CC=7.6%,). Multivariate regression modeling for time to fusion found ABMP usage to be the only statistically significant predictor of time to fusion, predicting patients will achieve fusion nearly 40.7 days quicker with the use of ABMP. Conclusion: Joints treated with PDGF-B and ABMP demonstrated equivalent fusion rates. Treatments using ABMP and CC achieved quicker time to fusion and lower rates of reoperation when compared to treatments using PDGF-B and CC.

Salvage of Failed Ankle Arthrodesis by Conversion to Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Intermediate Term Results

Category: Ankle; Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: As ankle arthroplasty has become a reliable treatment for painful ankle arthritis, it has also been employed as a salvage procedure for failed ankle arthrodeses. Published studies of conversion have generally combined patients treated by several surgeons using a variety of different prostheses, with short-term follow-up. Early reports showed failure in patients with an absent distal fibula, and more recently that has been considered a contraindication. Some reports have expressed concerns about doing hindfoot arthrodeses at the same setting. This retrospective study examines the mid-term follow-up of 19 patients treated by a single surgeon using a standard technique with a single prosthesis, and includes patients with a deficient distal fibula and concomitant hindfoot fusions. Methods: Between May 2010 and August 2019, 28 patients underwent conversion of their failed ankle arthrodesis to a total ankle arthroplasty using a prosthesis with an intramedullary tibial component. Nineteen patients (10 males and 9 females) with an average age of 49.8 (45-81) years at the time of surgery were included in the study. Three modes of ankle arthrodesis failure were identified: 1) solid tibial-talar-calcaneal arthrodesis with a painful malposition (n=3); 2) painful pseudarthrosis of the ankle (n=4); and 3) solid ankle fusion with painful adjacent hindfoot arthritis (n=12). The patients in the first two groups were treated with arthroplasty alone, while those in the third group had an arthroplasty and hindfoot fusion. Four patients had a deficient distal fibula. Outcomes were evaluated post-operatively with a Visual Analog Scale, the AOFAS Ankle and Hindfoot Scale, a satisfaction survey, and radiographic assessment of the arthroplasty and any concomitant hindfoot fusions. Results: Mean follow-up was 7.6 (2.6-11.8) years. Complications included fracture with or without subsequent surgery (n=4), subsequent sub-talar fusion (n=1), varus deformity (n=1), and wound dehiscence or infection (n=2). Three patients had revision of their talar components. Postoperative dorsiflexion was 7.8 ± 12.6 degrees and plantarflexion 20.9±13.37 degrees. Two patients developed lucencies about the tibial stem, and two had mild subsidence of the talar components. There were no hindfoot pseudarthroses. Four patients with a deficient distal fibula were all able to be salvaged with an intact ankle arthroplasty. Mean (± SD) VAS Score was 4.6 ± 3.0 and AOFAS score was 71.2±21.7. Sixty-seven percent reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied. Forty-four percent had significant limitations in either activity or ADLs in their ankle function. Conclusion: Total ankle arthroplasty should be considered as a salvage procedure for patients with a failed ankle arthrodesis. With the described techniques it can be combined with concomitant hindfoot arthrodesis procedures and can be used successfully in patients who have a deficient distal fibula. While there can be a high prosthetic retention rate in the medium term, prospective patients must be counseled about potential limitations.

Patient Reported and Radiographic Outcomes following the Malerba Osteotomy

Category: Hindfoot; Other Introduction/Purpose: The Malerba calcaneal osteotomy is a step cut Z-type osteotomy with a lateral wedge resection used to treat hindfoot varus deformity. The osteotomy allows for lateral translation while the wedge resection enables lateral rotation of the calcaneal tuberosity. The technique enables a more powerful correction of hindfoot varus without excessive lateral translation of the calcaneus, which has been shown to cause tarsal tunnel syndrome. Thus far, there have been few published clinical and radiographic outcomes on the Malerba osteotomy. The purpose of this article is to report on patient reported outcome scores (PROMIS), complications, and radiographic improvement in a series of patients treated with this osteotomy. Methods: A prospectively collected foot and ankle registry was queried to retrospectively identify patients who underwent a Malerba osteotomy from February 2016 through January 2022. Patients were included if they were over 18 years of age, underwent a Malerba osteotomy, had preoperative and minimum 1-year postoperative PROMIS scores, and preoperative and postoperative radiographs. 40 patients met the inclusion criteria (average age 54.3 years). PROMIS scores from 6 domains including physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, global physical health, global mental health, and depression were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. Radiographic measures including talonavicular coverage angle (TNCA), calcaneal pitch (CP), and lateral talus-1st metatarsal angle (Meary’s angle) were measured and compared preoperatively and postoperatively. Complications and radiographic union were also recorded. Results: At a mean of 22 months, PROMIS domains including physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, global physical health, and global mental health improved significantly; the depression scale did not significantly change (Table 1). Calcaneal pitch and Meary’s angle significantly improved from 22.9 to 19.1 (p &lt;.001) and 8.2 to 5 (p &lt;.001), respectively. The talonavicular coverage angle did not significantly improve (p=.2). There were no delayed unions or nonunions. There was 1 case of sural neuritis but no instances of postoperative tarsal tunnel syndrome. There were 3 (8%) superficial infections treated nonoperatively and 0 deep infections. 4 patients (10%) required reoperation: 2 for removal of hardware and 2 for conversion to subtalar fusion. Conclusion: The Malerba calcaneal Z-osteotomy is an effective and safe method to treat adult hindfoot varus deformity. In our series, patients demonstrated an improvement in PROMIS and radiographic outcomes with minimal complications. In particular, the rate of neurologic complications was very low with only one case of sural neuritis and no cases of iatrogenic tarsal tunnel syndrome.

Technique Tip: Maintaining Anatomy While Achieving Compression During Primary Subtalar Fusion in Setting of Comminuted Calcaneal Tuberosity Fracture

Calcaneal fractures are severe injuries that frequently predispose patients to post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Comminuted fractures of the posterior facet carry a particularly high risk, so many surgeons will perform primary subtalar fusion in the setting of a Sander’s IV calcaneal fracture. Maintaining desired anatomy of the comminuted tuberosity while achieving compression at the fusion interface, however, can be difficult while performing primary fusion. We describe a case of an elderly patient who sustained a Sanders IV calcaneal fracture with a severely comminuted posterior facet and calcaneal tuberosity. The patient underwent open reduction internal fixation and primary fusion with a novel technique that permitted compression at the subtalar joint for fusion while maintaining desired anatomy of the comminuted tuberosity fragments. This technique, which used fully and partially threaded screws, allowed rigid fixation at the subtalar joint without need for follow-up procedures or violation of the skin with k-wires. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level V—expert opinion.