Rate Of Subsequent Injury Research Articles

Clinical Measures Associated with Subsequent Injury after Adolescent Concussion: A Prospective Cohort Study

ABSTRACT Purpose To examine associations between clinical measures (self-reported and clinician-administered) and subsequent injury rates in the year after concussion return to play (RTP) among adolescent athletes. Methods We performed a prospective, longitudinal study of adolescents ages 13-18 years. Each participant was initially assessed within 21 days of concussion and again within 5 days of receiving RTP clearance from their physician. Participants completed self-report measures: the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), and clinician-administered measures: single and dual-task tandem gait (TG) and reaction time (RT; simple and clinical) assessments. They then completed monthly surveys for a year after RTP which assessed exposure to injury (sport participation) and subsequent injuries (musculoskeletal or concussions) sustained. We used Poisson regression models to calculate injury rate ratios with number of subsequent injuries sustained as the outcome, adjusted for RTP clearance time and competitive exposures for each measure. Results 41 participants were included (age = 15.5±1.3 years, 56% female, 9.6±4.6 days post-concussion; 38.0±31.5 days to RTP). A higher injury rate per athletic exposure was observed for simple RT≥505 ms vs <505 ms (injury rate ratio = 3.22; 95% confidence interval = 1.56, 7.12; p = 0.002). Injury rates did not significantly differ by PSQI or TSK scores, single/dual-task TG time, or clinical RT. Conclusions Simple reaction time may be one risk factor that is associated with higher rates of subsequent injury after adolescent concussion. A simple reaction time measure incorporated into a comprehensive concussion RTP assessment may identify some individuals at higher risk of subsequent injury in the year following concussion, though further research is needed to better understand this relationship.

What is the incidence of subsequent adjacent joint injury after patellofemoral pain?

Objective To investigate the incidence of subsequent lumbar spine, hip, and ankle-foot injuries after a diagnosis of patellofemoral pain. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Military Health System. Participants Individuals (n = 92,319) ages 17–60 diagnosed with patellofemoral pain between 2010–2011. Interventions Therapeutic exercise. Main Outcome Measures Frequency of adjacent joint injuries in the 2-year period after initial patellofemoral pain injury, and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and Kaplan–Meier survival curves for risk of adjacent joint injury based on receiving therapeutic exercise for the initial injury. Results After initial patellofemoral pain diagnosis, 42,983 (46.6%) individuals sought care for an adjacent joint injury. Of these, 19,587 (21.2%) were subsequently diagnosed with a lumbar injury, 2837 (3.1%) a hip injury, and 10,166 (11.0%) an ankle-foot injury. One in five (19.5%; n = 17,966) received therapeutic exercise which reduced the risk of having a subsequent lumbar (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.76–0.81), hip (HR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.87–0.98) or ankle-foot (HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.83–0.90) injury. Conclusion The results suggest that a high number of individuals with patellofemoral pain will sustain an adjacent joint injury within 2 years although causal relationships cannot be determined. Receiving therapeutic exercise for the initial knee injury reduced the risk of sustaining an adjacent joint injury. This study helps provide normative data for subsequent injury rates in this population and guide development of future studies designed to understand causal factors.

Impact of prior ACL, hamstring or groin injury on lower limb strength and jump kinetics in elite female footballers

Introduction: Prior injury is a risk factor for lower limb injury in female footballers. An improved understanding of the impact of the most common and severe injuries on lower limb strength and biomechanics may help to optimise rehabilitation strategies and decrease subsequent injury rates. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to compare lower limb strength and countermovement jump (CMJ) kinetics between elite female footballers with and without a history of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), hamstring strain, or hip/groin injury. Methods: 369 elite female Australian football, soccer and rugby league players aged 15–35 years underwent assessments of isometric hip adductor and abductor strength, eccentric knee flexor strength, and CMJ vertical ground reaction forces. Players reported their lifetime history of ACLR, and whether they had sustained a hamstring strain, or hip/groin injury in the previous 12-months. Strength and jump/landing kinetics, including between-leg asymmetry, were compared between players with and without prior injury. Logistic regression was used to determine the variables that best distinguished between players with and without prior injury. Results: Players with a unilateral history of ACLR (n=24) displayed asymmetry (injured<uninjured leg) in eccentric knee flexor strength (mean difference=-6.9%, 95%CI=-9.1 to -4.8%), isometric hip abductor strength (mean difference=-2.4%, 95%CI=-4.4 to -0.4%), and peak landing force (mean difference=-5.9%, 95%CI=-11.0 to -0.9%). Together, between-leg asymmetry in eccentric knee flexor strength, isometric hip abductor strength, and CMJ peak landing force distinguished between players with and without prior ACLR with 93% accuracy. No differences in strength or CMJ kinetics were observed between players with and without a history of hamstring or hip/groin injury. Discussion: Elite female footballers with a history of ACLR, but not hamstring or hip/groin injury, exhibit persistent between-leg asymmetries in lower limb strength and jump kinetics following a return to sport. To address the effects of prior injury, ACLR rehabilitation programs for elite female footballers should consider targeting between-leg asymmetries in eccentric knee flexor strength, isometric hip abductor strength, and CMJ kinetics. Conflict of interest statement: Funding for travel costs associated with data collection was provided by Vald Performance (Brisbane, Australia) and SMA Research Grant. My co-authors and I acknowledge that we have no conflict of interest of relevance to the submission of this abstract.

Tibial Spine Repair in the Pediatric Population: Outcomes and Subsequent Injury Rates

PurposeTo evaluate short- to mid-term outcomes after arthroscopic operative fixation of tibial spine fractures in pediatric patients, to determine the incidence of further ipsilateral and contralateral knee injuries, and to describe associated meniscal pathology and intraoperative findings at the time of tibial spine repair.MethodsAll patients under age 18 with a tibial spine fracture treated arthroscopically at 1 institution by 2 surgeons from 2008 through 2019 were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients at least 1 year from their date of surgery were contacted to complete a questionnaire, which included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form. Questions pertained to knee function, pain, and further injury or surgery on either knee. Patient charts, preoperative imaging, and operative reports were reviewed to determine demographic information, tibial spine fracture type, concomitant injuries, and intraoperative details.ResultsSixty-six of 97 eligible patients (68%) completed questionnaires. Average age at initial surgery was 10.7 years (range, 4-17). Mean follow-up was 5.8 years (range, 1.0-11.9). Average IKDC score at follow-up was 91.4 (range, 62.1-100). Patients reported their knee as 92% of “normal” (range, 40-100). Thirty-five (53%) currently participate in sport; 6 (9%) remain limited because of instability and residual pain. Regarding pain on a visual analog scale, 94%, 95%, and 83% of patients reported less than a 3 at rest, with daily activity, and with sport, respectively. Seven patients (11%) had subsequent ACL rupture. Six patients (9%) underwent ACL reconstruction 3.1 years (range, 0.9-7) after initial repair. Fourteen patients (21%) required at least 1 additional procedure. Regarding the contralateral knee, there were no ACL or tibial spine injuries. Sixty-one (92%) patients were both satisfied and would definitely undergo the procedure again.ConclusionsAlthough many pediatric patients demonstrate excellent results after tibial spine repair at mean 5.8 years follow-up, 10.6% sustained an ipsilateral ACL rupture, and 21% required an additional procedure. No patient had a contralateral tibial spine or ACL injury. This is helpful when counseling patients regarding injury risk when returning to activity after tibial spine repair.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, therapeutic case series.

Do subsequent injury rates and injury regions differ between concussion and other injury types in the Australian Football League?

Do subsequent injury rates and injury regions differ between concussion and other injury types in the Australian Football League?

Side of Hamstring Harvest Does Not Affect Performance, Return-to-Sport Rate, or Future Hamstring Injuries After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Among Professional Baseball Pitchers

Background: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) is a successful procedure among professional baseball pitchers. It is unclear if hamstring tendon harvest side for UCLR affects the outcome or alters the risk for subsequent hamstring injury. Hypothesis: Players with prior UCLR with ipsilateral (drive leg) hamstring autograft will have the same return-to-sport (RTS) rate and performance upon RTS but a higher number of subsequent lower extremity injuries than those with contralateral (landing leg) hamstring autograft. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All players between 2010 and 2015 who underwent UCLR with hamstring autograft were included. Surgical details of their procedures were recorded from operative reports. Outcomes for UCLR with hamstring autograft harvested from the drive leg were compared with UCLR with the graft harvested from the landing leg. Results: Overall, 191 players underwent UCLR with hamstring autograft (drive leg, n = 58, 30%; landing leg, n = 133, 70%). The docking technique was more common in the drive leg group, while the figure-of-8 technique was more common in the landing leg group (P > .001). More patients in the landing leg group underwent concomitant treatment of the ulnar nerve than the drive leg group (P < .001). No difference existed in RTS rates or timing of RTS between groups. No differences in subsequent ipsilateral or contralateral hamstring injuries occurred between players who underwent UCLR with hamstring autograft from the drive leg or the landing leg (P≥ .999 and P = .460, respectively). No difference in overall upper or lower extremity injury rates existed between groups (all P > .05), and no difference in performance metrics existed between groups upon RTS. Conclusion: No difference in RTS rate, performance upon RTS, or subsequent injury rates (hamstring, lower extremity, or upper extremity) existed between players who underwent UCLR with hamstring autograft whether the graft came from the drive or the landing leg.

Subsequent Injury is Common after Foot and Ankle Surgery in Patients Receiving Workers’ Compensation

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Workers’ compensation (WC) has been associated with poor outcomes following a variety of injuries and surgeries. Previous studies have investigated surgical outcomes via satisfaction surveys, but rates of subsequent injury following surgery have not been specifically studied. The purpose of this study was to investigate the rates, locations and risk factors for subsequent injuries in WC patients and non-WC patients who underwent the same surgeries. Methods: With IRB approval, we identified the records of patients with a foot or ankle surgery performed by a single surgeon from 2009-2015. We included only surgeries with one of the most common current procedural terminology (CPT) codes from the WC population. A retrospective chart review was performed on all WC and non-WC patients with at least one of these CPT codes. A subsequent injury was defined as a new injury at a different anatomical location that occurred from 2 months to 2 years after the index surgery. Chi-square and two-tailed t-tests were used to compare WC and non-WC patient populations, and to determine factors associated with subsequent injuries. Results: Overall, the WC population had higher rates of subsequent injury than the non-WC population 23.21% versus 7.27%, p=.0011. Within the WC patient population, patients with subsequent injuries were older than patients without subsequent injuries 48.78±7.30 versus 41.58±12.40, p=.0137. In a blinded review of the charts and Iowa Courts Online, legal representation was found to be more common in WC patients with subsequent injuries than WC patients without subsequent injuries (76.92% versus 37.21%, p=.0240). In the non-WC population, there were more males in the group without subsequent injuries than in the group with subsequent injuries 42.48% versus 8.33%, p=.0287. There were no significant differences in locations of subsequent injury. Hip, knee and contralateral foot and ankle were common areas of subsequent injury in both groups. Conclusion: Overall, WC patients had higher rates of subsequent injury than non-WC patients. Within the WC group, legal representation further raised the risk of subsequent injury. Gender may mediate variable reporting of subsequent injuries in non-WC populations. While the reason for this increased risk of subsequent injury is not known, the differences are enough that they should be considered when counseling WC patients considering these surgeries. Additionally, if further study supported these findings, knowledge of the areas at risk for subsequent injury might lead to preventative strategies that could decrease the risk of subsequent injury.

Predictors of Subsequent Injury After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Children and Adolescents

Objectives:Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure and contralateral ACL tears are more frequent in children/adolescents than adults. These re-injuries result in significant time lost from sport, and may contribute to worse long-term outcomes and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. The reasons for higher subsequent injury rates in this unique population are incompletely understood.Methods:We analyzed a single center continuous cohort of patients under the age of eighteen years. Subjects underwent primary ACL reconstruction between 2006 and 2014 with minimum 2-year follow up. Age, sex, graft type, duration of physical therapy, time to return to sport, and length of follow-up were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression modeling to assess their contribution to the risk of subsequent ACL injury.Results:A total of 109 subjects met all study inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eighty-two subjects (75%) had follow-up data and were included in the final analysis. Mean age was 14 +/- 1.9 years (range 8 - 17 years). Mean follow-up was 47.7 +/- 15.6 months (range 28 - 91 months). Seventeen patients (20.7%) sustained an ACL graft rupture, eleven patients (13.4%) sustained a contralateral ACL tear, and one patient (1.2%) sustained both. The combined subsequent injury incidence was 35.4% (29 of 82 subjects). The odds of subsequent ACL injury decreased by 0.29 for every yearly increase in age (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53 - 0.92, p = 0.008), and decreased by 0.16 for every monthly increase in time to return to sport (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.69 - 0.99, p = 0.048). Sex, graft type, duration of physical therapy, sport, and length of follow up did not have a statistically significant impact on the rate of subsequent ACL injury (p > 0.05).Conclusion:Subsequent ACL injuries (ipsilateral or contralateral) are common after primary ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents (combined incidence 35%). Within this high-risk population, younger age and an earlier return to sport portend a higher risk of a second injury.

Return to Sport After Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Its Effect on Subsequent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure and contralateral ACL tears are more frequent in children and adolescents than adults. The reasons for higher subsequent injury rates in this population are incompletely understood. We analyzed a continuous cohort of patients who were <18 years of age. Subjects underwent isolated, primary ACL reconstruction with autograft between 2006 and January 1, 2014, and had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Return-to-sport characteristics were described, and multivariable Cox regression modeling was used to identify predictors of a second ACL injury. Candidate variables included patient factors (age, sex, physeal status, tibial slope, notch width index), surgical characteristics (graft type, surgical technique), measures of recovery (time to return to sport, duration of physical therapy), and patients' preoperative and postoperative sports involvement (primary and secondary sports, number of sports). A total of 112 subjects met inclusion criteria; of these patients, 85 (76%) had complete follow-up data and were analyzed. The mean age (and standard deviation) was 13.9 ± 2.1 years (range, 6 to 17 years); 77% had open physes. The mean follow-up was 48.3 ± 15.3 months. Seventy-seven patients (91%) returned to sports, and 84% returned to the same sport. The mean Marx activity score at the time of the latest follow-up was 13.7 ± 3.5 points. Patients were involved in fewer sports after ACL reconstruction, 1.48 ± 0.92 compared with 1.83 ± 1.01 sports before reconstruction (p = 0.002). Sixteen patients (19%) sustained an ACL graft rupture, 11 patients (13%) sustained a contralateral ACL tear, and 1 of these patients (1%) sustained both. The overall prevalence of a second ACL injury was 32%. Time to return to sport was the only significant predictor of a second ACL injury, with a slower return being protective (hazard ratio per month, 0.87 [95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.99]; p = 0.04). Pediatric athletes return to sports at a high rate (91%) after ACL reconstruction. Unfortunately, the prevalence of a second ACL injury is high at 32%. Within this population, an earlier return to sport is predictive of a second ACL injury. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Epidemiological Patterns of Initial and Subsequent Injuries in Collegiate Football Athletes

Background: A body of epidemiological studies has examined football injuries and associated risk factors among collegiate athletes. However, few existing studies specifically analyzed injury risk in terms of initial or subsequent injuries. Purpose: To determine athlete-exposures (AEs) and rates of initial and subsequent injury among collegiate football athletes. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiological study. Methods: Injury and exposure data collected from collegiate football players from two Division I universities (2007-2011) were analyzed. Rate of initial injury was calculated as the number of initial injuries divided by the total number of AEs for initial injuries, while the rate for subsequent injury was calculated as the number of subsequent injuries divided by the total number of AEs for subsequent injury. Poisson regression was used to determine injury rate ratio (subsequent vs initial injury), with adjustment for other covariates. Results: The total AEs during the study period were 67,564, resulting in an overall injury rate of 35.2 per 10,000 AEs. Rates for initial and subsequent injuries were 31.7 and 45.3 per 10,000 AEs, respectively, with a rate ratio (RR) of 1.4 for rate of subsequent injury vs rate of initial injury (95% CI, 1.1-1.9). Rate of injury appeared to increase with each successive injury. RR during games was 1.8 (95% CI, 1.1-3.0). The rate of subsequent injuries to the head, neck, and face was 10.9 per 10,000 AEs, nearly double the rate of initial injuries to the same sites (RR = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.5). For wide receivers, the rate of subsequent injuries was 2.2 times the rate of initial injuries (95% CI, 1.3-3.8), and for defensive linemen, the rate of subsequent injuries was 2.1 times the rate of initial injuries (95% CI, 1.1-3.9). Conclusion: The method used in this study allows for a more accurate determination of injury risk among football players who have already been injured at least once. Further research is warranted to better identify which specific factors contribute to this increased risk for subsequent injury.

Maternal organ donation and acute injuries in surviving children

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to test whether maternal deceased organ donation is associated with rates of subsequent acute injuries among surviving children after their mother’s death. MethodsThis is alongitudinal cohort analysis of children linked to mothers who died of a catastrophic brain event in Ontario, Canada, between April 1988 and March 2012. Surviving children were distinguished by whether their mother was an organ donor after death. The primary outcome was an acute injury event in surviving children during the year after their mother’s death. ResultsSurviving children (n = 454) had a total of 293 injury events during the year after their mother’s death, equivalent to an average of 65 events per 100 children per year and a significant difference comparing children of mothers who were organ donors to children of mothers who were not organ donors (21 vs 82, P < .001). This difference in subsequent injury rates between groups was equal to a 76% relative reduction in risk (95% confidence interval, 62%-85%). ConclusionsDeceased organ donation was associated with a reduction in excess acute injuries among surviving children after their mother’s death. An awareness of this positive association provides some reassurance about deceased organ donation programs.

Functional bracing of ACL injuries: current state and future directions

Functional braces are commonly prescribed to treat anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. The results of the existing literature on functional brace use are mixed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the history and current state of functional ACL bracing and to identify design criteria that could improve upon current bracing technologies. A literature search was performed through the PubMed MEDLINE database in April 2013 for the keywords "anterior cruciate ligament" and "brace". Articles published between January 1, 1980, and April 4, 2013, were retrieved and reviewed. Current functional braces used to treat ACL injury were identified. The function of the native ACL was carefully studied to identify design requirements that could improve upon current bracing technologies. Biomechanical evaluations of functional brace effects at time zero have been mixed. Functional brace use reportedly does not improve long-term patient outcomes following ACL reconstruction, but has been shown to reduce subsequent injury rates while skiing in both ACL-deficient and reconstructed skiers. In situ force in the ACL varies with flexion angle and activity. Currently, no brace has been designed and validated to replicate the force-flexion behavior of the native ACL. Biomechanical and clinical evidence suggests current functional bracing technologies do not sufficiently restore normal biomechanics to the ACL-deficient knee, protect the reconstructed ACL, and improve long-term patient outcomes. Further research into a functional brace designed to apply forces to the knee joint similar in magnitude to the native ACL should be pursued. III.

Injury risk in men's Canada West University football.

Injury and participation information was collected over 5 years (1993-1997) on varsity men's football players in the Canada West Universities Athletic Association. The locations of acute time-loss injuries or neurologic injures were coded as head and neck, upper extremity (shoulder to hand), or lower extremity (hip to foot). Poisson regression-based generalized estimating equations were used to estimate rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Injury rates were higher during games as compared with practice periods (for the head and neck, rate ratio (RR) = 9.75 (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.50, 12.67); for upper extremities, RR = 5.76 (95% CI: 4.46, 7.45); and for lower extremities, RR = 7.06 (95% CI: 6.03, 8.25)). In dry-field game situations, head and neck injury rates were 1.59 times higher on artificial turf than on natural grass (95% CI: 1.04, 2.42). Lower extremity game injury rates were higher on artificial turf than on natural grass under both dry (RR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.35, 2.48) and wet (RR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.18, 4.52) field conditions. Injury rates increased with every additional year of participation. Past injury increased the rate of subsequent injury. The effect of an artificial field surface may be related to infrequent use. Risk factors for injury included participation in a game, playing on artificial turf, being a veteran player, and having a past injury.

The urban epidemiology of recurrent injury: beyond age, race, and gender stereotypes.

To profile all patients presenting to an urban ED with any injury, and to determine whether the rate of subsequent injury treated in the ED varied by demographic and E-code (external mechanism of injury) category. The hypothesis that young black males were disproportionately at risk for re-injury was addressed. A cohort of consecutive patients presenting to an urban ED with any injury between January 1, 1991, and November 31, 1992, were followed prospectively for 1 year from their index visit dates. Any repeat ED visits due to injury were sought. The mean number of injury visits per year (the total number of ED injury visits for each patient divided by 1 year) was computed for the overall population and by race, age, gender, and E-code. The sample consisted of 34,378 patients who made 44,813 visits to the ED for injury. Of these patients, 22% had a repeat injury in 1 year, with a cohort mean of 1.30 injury visits per year. This mean did not vary appreciably by race (black 1.33, white 1.27), age (1-17 yr, 1.21; 18-24 yr, 1.32; 25-64 yr, 1.34; > 65 yr, 1.23), gender (males 1.33, females 1.27), or E-code category. Having a prior injury visit in the preceding year was the best predictor of future injury (mean repeat visit rate = 2.08). When examining patients presenting with any injury to an urban ED, the mean numbers of injury visits are remarkably similar across demographic and E-code categories. Although there are factors that place patients at risk for recurrent injury, those factors are not demographic-all patients presenting to an ED with injury should be considered at risk for re-injury.