Sublingual Immunotherapy In Patients Research Articles

Effect of house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy in patients with adult atopic dermatitis with rhinitis.

Aim: Whether house dust mite (HDM) sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is effective for the skin symptoms of adult atopic dermatitis (AD) is unclear.Methods: HDM SLIT was added to conventional AD treatment for 10 HDM-sensitized AD patients with rhinitis for 2years.Results: Seven out of ten enrolled patients completed the study. Eczema Area and Severity Index score was significantly reduced when comparing before treatment and at 24months follow-up. CD203c ratio in the basophil activation test using HDM extract, skin prick test with HDM extract and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus/Dermatophagoides farinae specific-IgG4 tended to improve when comparing before treatment and after treatment.Conclusion: HDM SLIT might be a therapeutic option for AD patients with rhinitis who are sensitized to HDM.

Retrospective Observational Study on Telemedicine in Sublingual Immunotherapy for Patients with Japanese Cedar Pollinosis and House Dust Mite Allergic Rhinitis.

Introduction: In Japan, telemedicine has gradually expanded due to deregulation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, its current status remains unclear, as it is primarily provided by general practitioners. This study aims to examine the use of telemedicine in sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for patients with Japanese cedar pollen allergy and/or house dust mite allergic rhinitis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical record data from seven otorhinolaryngology clinics and performed an exploratory evaluation between a group that combined telemedicine and in-person visits during the initial 6 months of SLIT and another group with only in-person visits. Results: Following propensity score matching, 51 and 82 patients were eligible for the telemedicine and in-person groups, respectively, with 33 cases in both groups. Both groups had similar characteristics after matching. No significant difference was found in the withdrawal rate at 6 months from the start of SLIT (6.1% and 9.1% in each group; p = 1.00), side effects, or treatment efficacy between the two groups. The average copayment for patients tended to be significantly higher in the telemedicine group after one, three, and 6 months following SLIT initiation. Discussion: The situation of patients who receive an appropriate combination of telemedicine and in-person visits is not significantly different from patients who receive in-person visits alone. This study may help indicate the actual status of telemedicine in Japan. Further investigation at more facilities is necessary in the future to dispel concerns in the practice setting.

Circulating T follicular helper 2 cells, T follicular regulatory cells and regulatory B cells are effective biomarkers for predicting the response to house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy in patients with allergic respiratory diseases.

The relationships between T follicular helper (Tfh) cells and antigen-specific immunoglobulins (sIgs) in patients with allergic respiratory diseases who are receiving antigen immunotherapy (AIT) have not been fully clarified. Therefore, we started to perform house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy (HDM-SLIT) for 20 patients with atopic asthma comorbid with allergic rhinitis (AA+AR) who were already receiving ordinary treatments including inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). We examined percentages of circulating T follicular helper (cTfh) and regulatory (cTfr) cells and percentages of circulating regulatory T (cTreg) and B (cBreg) cells by FACS and we examined levels of Der-p/f sIgs by ELISA. Based on the symptom score (asthma control questionnaire: ACQ) and medication score ((global initiative for asthma: GINA) treatment step score) in patients with AA, the patients were divided into responders and non-responders. The percentage of cTfh2 cells significantly decreased and the percentage of cTfh1 cells significantly increased within the first year. Der-p/f sIgEs decreased after a transient elevation at 3 months in both groups. Notably, the percentage of cTfh2 cells and the ratio of cTfh2/cBreg cells and Der-p/f sIgEs greatly decreased in responders from 6 months to 12 months. The percentages of cTfr and cTreg cells showed significant negative correlations with the percentage of cTfh2 cells. The percentage of IL-4+ cTfh cells were significantly decreased and the percentage of IFN-γ+ cTfh cells were increased before treatment to 24 months in 6 patients examined (4 responders and 2 non-responders). We performed multi plelogistic regression analysis based on these results, the ratios of cTfh2/cTfr cells and cTfh2/cBreg cells at the start of therapy were statistically effective biomarkers for predicting the response to HDM-SLIT in patients with AA+AR.

Tolerability and Safety of Sublingual Immunotherapy in Patients with Tree Pollen Allergy in Daily Practice-An Open, Prospective, Non-Interventional Study.

To investigate the tolerability and safety of two sublingual tree pollen extracts approved in 2018, a non-interventional study (NIS) was performed. This NIS was an 8-month observational study conducted at 84 sites throughout Germany. Study participants received either a sublingual liquid allergen extract of birch pollen (SBPE) or a liquid allergen extract consisting of a mixture of birch, hazel, and alder tree pollen (STPE). Data from 432 patients were analyzed for the occurrence of adverse events and patient compliance. At least one local reaction occurred in 69 (22.2%) patients, whereas systemic reactions were only observed in 27 (6.3%) patients. STPE-treated patients developed systemic reactions more frequently than SBPE-treated patients (SBPE: 9 (4.3%) vs. STPE: 18 (8.0%)). Only one patient developed a systemic grade III reaction. Severe systemic grade IV reactions were not observed. A total of 348 (98.6%) of the patients who completed all visits were satisfied or very satisfied with the sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), and 322 (71%) patients completed all visits. Both investigated products were well tolerated by the patients and demonstrated a good safety profile. AEs were observed less frequently than in the preceding clinical phase III trial, and no new safety concerns were identified.

Efficacy and safety of Artemisia annua sublingual immunotherapy in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis over two pollen seasons.

This study investigates the efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with A. annua allergens in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis over two pollen seasons. Seventy patients with moderate-severe seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis were divided evenly into the SLIT and control groups. The SLIT last from 3months before the summer-autumn pollen season in 2021 till the end of the summer-autumn pollen season in 2022. The daily individual symptom score, total rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score (dTRSS), total medication score (dTMS), combined score of medication and rhinoconjunctivitis symptom (dCSMRS), visual analog scale (VAS) score, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. The average pollen concentration in 2022 was twice that previous two-year during the pollen season. Fifty-six patients completed treatments (SLIT group: 29, control group: 27). Compared with baseline, the individual symptoms, dTRSS, dTMS, dCSMRS, and VAS scores of SLIT group declined in 2021. After 16months of SLIT, all efficacy indexes in 2022 were still lower than baseline and equivalent to those in 2021. In control group, the efficacy indexes in 2022 were higher than that in 2020 and 2021. The efficacy indexes of SLIT group were lower than those of control group in 2021 and 2022. SLIT is effective for both mono- and poly-sensitized patients. AEs incidence in SLIT group was 82.7% without severe AEs. The A. annua-SLIT can obtain efficacy and safety over two pollen seasons for patients with moderate-severe seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

Analysis of adherence and determinants of sublingual immunotherapy in patients with Artemisia pollen-induced allergic rhinitis

Objective:To monitor adherence to specific sublingual immunotherapy （SLIT） in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis（AR）, analyse factors influencing adherence, and provide research support to effectively improve adherence. Methods:Patients with AR who underwent Artemisia pollen SLIT at the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from May 2021 to April 2022 were retrospectively followed up by telephone to investigate the current status of treatment, count the causes of shedding, and extract relevant information from their medical record data for analysis. Results:Of the 112 patients surveyed, 34 discontinued treatment（30.3%）; patients who experienced adverse reactions and SLIT patients who had been on treatment for more than 6 months showed relatively good adherence（P<0.05）. The main reasons for discontinuation in patients who dropped out were: asymptomatic discomfort during the non-pollen phase and therefore discontinuation of treatment or feeling that treatment was ineffective 9 cases（26.5%）, forced discontinuation due to vaccination or pregnancy, or epidemics 6 cases（17.6%）. Conclusion:Long-term adherence of patients to Artemisia pollen SLIT still needs to be brought to the attention of healthcare professionals, especially in the early stages of treatment when good patient education and good channels of trust and communication between doctors and patients need to be established.

Compliance and withdraw reason of sublingual immunotherapy in 245 patients with allergic rhinitis

Objective:To investigate the compliance of patients with allergic rhinitis（AR） receiving sublingual immunotherapy and its influencing factors. Methods:The clinical data of 291 AR patients who received sublingual immunotherapy for dust mites at the First Hospital of Peking University from January 2016 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, and their outpatient or telephone follow-up was conducted. For patients whose treatment time was less than 2 years, the time and reason for the loss were recorded, and the factors affecting their compliance were discussed from the aspects of gender, age, and education. Results:Among the 291 patients, 245 cases（84.2%） were successfully followed up, and 193 cases（78.8%） fell off midway（treatment time<2 years）. The overall compliance rate was 21.22%（52/245）. The compliance rate of children is higher than that of adults（χ²=21.306, P<0.05）, and gender and education level have no significant effect on the compliance rate. The time period for the largest number of shedding was 6-<12 months after treatment（68 cases, 27.8%）. The main cause of shedding was symptom relief, which was considered cured（16.7%）. Secondly, within 3 months after treatment, a total of 61 patients（24.9%） fell off, of which 34 cases（13.9%） fell off because of troublesome medication, often missed medication, and simply stopped taking the drug. Statistics on the overall reasons for shedding in 193 patients, the top three shedding reasons were: cured after symptom relief（59 cases, 30.6%）, troublesome medication, discontinuation after missed dose（44 cases, 22.8%）, slow onset or ineffectiveness（26 cases, 13.5%）. Conclusion:The overall compliance of sublingual immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis is poor, and the compliance of children is better than that of adults. Clinicians should focus on the reasons for patients to fall off at various times, strengthen patient education, enhance patient confidence in treatment, and improve the compliance of patients.

PRU P 3 SUBLINGUAL IMMUNOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE PLANT FOOD ALLERGY

Non-specific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTPs) are panallergens widely distributed in foods such as Rosaceae fruits and nuts. Peach nsLTP allergen Pru p 3 is the most frequent cause of food reactions in south Europe.

Immunotherapy for Asthma.

Asthma represents one of the biggest global health concerns with increasing prevalence and influence on global health. Several distinct asthma phenotypes have been identified with one of the most common, earliest recognized, and described being the allergic asthma phenotype, in which allergens trigger asthma through mechanisms involving allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE). Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT), in the forms of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), has been used for many decades as a tool for reducing IgE-mediated sensitization and controlling symptoms of allergic disease, most commonly for allergic rhinitis, and it remains the only currently available disease modifying therapy in atopic patients. AIT has been studied for use in mild to moderate allergic asthma. While the data are often inconsistent, and utilize a multitude of different methods, antigens, and outcome measures, in general, AIT may have several beneficial effects on asthma disease control, quality of life, and requirement for medication. These benefits are notable when immunotherapy is used as an adjunct to pharmacologic treatment in carefully selected and monitored patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma. Patients with severe asthma are excluded from these trials. Importantly, patients with asthma, and in particular severe asthma, may have a higher rate of systemic adverse reactions to SCIT, including anaphylaxis; however, these events are overall rare. Future research in the area is needed to definitively assess the benefit of SCIT and SLIT for patients with asthma, comparing outcomes with different methods, addressing the role of AIT in severe asthma, significance of multiallergen AIT in allergic asthma, and safety concerns in asthma.

Efficacy of House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Sensitization to house dust mites (HDMs) is frequent in patients with atopic dermatitis. To investigate the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract in patients with atopic dermatitis sensitized to HDM. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled 91 patients 3 years or older, with SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score greater than or equal to 15 and positive skin test result and/or IgE to D pteronyssinus. Patients were stratified according to age (<12 and ≥12 years) to receive HDM SLIT or placebo for 18 months. Primary outcome was a greater than or equal to 15-point decrease in SCORAD score. Secondary outcomes were decreases in SCORAD and objective SCORAD, Eczema Area and Severity Index, visual analog scale for symptoms, and pruritus scale scores; Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1; and decrease greater than or equal to 4 points in Dermatology Life Quality Index. Background therapy was maintained. A total of 66 patients completed the study (35 HDM SLIT, 31 placebo). After 18 months, 74.2% and 58% of patients in the HDM SLIT group and the placebo group, respectively, showed greater than or equal to 15-point decrease in SCORAD score (relative risk, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.89-1.83). Significant SCORAD score decreases from baseline of 55.6% and 34.5% in HDM SLIT and placebo groups (mean difference, 20.4; 95% CI, 3.89-37.3), significant objective SCORAD score decreases of 56.8% and 34.9% in HDM SLIT and placebo groups (mean difference, 21.3; 95% CI, 0.66-41.81), and more patients with Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1 in the HDM SLIT group as compared with the placebo group (14 of 35 vs 5 of 31; relative risk, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.09-6.39) were observed at 18 months. Our results suggest that HDM SLIT may be effective in HDM-sensitized patients as an add-on treatment for atopic dermatitis.

Pru p 3 Sublingual Immunotherapy in Patients with Lipid Transfer Protein Syndrome: Is It Worth?

Background: Lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) syndrome is an important cause of multiple plant food allergy in the Mediterranean area. The effectiveness of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with the LTP Pru p 3 extract has been little investigated in the real-world setting. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of Pru p 3 SLIT in real-life patients with LTP syndrome with/without concurrent reactions to peanut and/or nuts. Methods: This was a prospective real-life study including all patients diagnosed with LTP allergy and treated with Pru p 3 SLIT between 2011 and 2018 in a tertiary hospital in Spain. Patients underwent open oral food challenge (OFC) tests for unpeeled peach and nuts/peanuts 1 year after the treatment started to assess food tolerance. A control group of patients diagnosed with LTP allergy who refused treatment with immunotherapy were included. Severity of symptoms and diet avoidance was recorded in both groups. Results: Twenty-nine patients with a median age of 24.7 years (range 5.5–43.1) were included: 100% were allergic to fruit; 72%, to peanut and/or nuts; 19 had a history of severe systemic reactions. Seven patients discontinued therapy; 3 (10%), due to adverse events. One year after SLIT start, 16 (73%) patients had negative OFC to peach; 95%, after 2 years; 69% had negative OFC to nuts/peanuts. The control group included 13 patients: 53.8% experienced reactions with new foods; severity of symptoms increased significantly (p < 0.001), and diet restrictions were maintained in this group. Conclusions: SLIT with Pru p 3 shows a good safety profile, and avoid dietary restrictions in patients with LTP syndrome treated in the real-life setting.

Effect of house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy in patients with Atopic Dermatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

House dust mites (HDM) sensitization is often found in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). We aimed to investigate the role of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) as adjuvant treatment for patients with AD allergic to HDM.

Serum Periostin as a Biomarker for Predicting Clinical Response to House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis

House dust mite (HDM) sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has proven to be effective for allergic rhinitis (AR), but its efficacy varies among patients. No candidate biomarkers for prediction of response to SLIT are available. Periostin, a matricellular protein, is involved in pathophysiology of AR, and its serum levels reflect airway allergic inflammation. To evaluate the relationship between serum periostin levels and current rhinitis control before and after standardized quality (SQ)-HDM SLIT, and to investigate the role of periostin in predicting clinical response. One hundred eleven subjects with HDM-induced AR were randomized to receive either SLIT plus pharmacotherapy or pharmacotherapy alone, for 48 weeks. At enrollment and the end of study, clinical characteristics and biomarkers that included serum periostin, serum HDM-specific IgE (s-IgE), total IgE, blood eosinophil counts, and Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) were measured. The association between clinical indices or biomarkers and clinical response to SLIT was analyzed. A response to SLIT was recorded in 64% (32 of 50) patients. High serum periostin levels (>30.2 ng/mL) were associated with an effective response to SLIT, and the magnitude of RQLQ improvement was correlated with the level of serum periostin. The sensitivity and specificity based on receiver operating characteristic analysis for periostin were higher than those of s-IgE. Multivariate regression analysis showed that serum periostin was an independent factor for SLIT responders. Serum periostin appears to be a useful biomarker for predicting the response to SQ-HDM SLIT in patients with AR.

β-Blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors with sublingual immunotherapy: are risks related to individual product safety profile?

The objective of this article is to review the available literature regarding the risks associated with sublingual immunotherapy and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or β-blocker use. It also evaluates for any differences in these risks among the available sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablets. A literature search was conducted in PubMed to identify peer-reviewed articles using the following keywords: anaphylaxis, ACE inhibitor, β-blocker, and sublingual immunotherapy. Minimal data exist regarding their safety of SLIT in patients concomitantly taking ACE inhibitors or β-blockers. The adverse reaction rates seem similar between SLIT products. A risk-versus-benefit discussion should be communicated with the patient taking a β-blocker before beginning SLIT but automatic denial of SLIT to these patients is not warranted.

Determinants and Factors of Satisfaction with Sublingual Immunotherapy in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis.

Allergen specific immunotherapy provides effective treatment of allergic rhinitis. Despite its efficacy, it can be signifi-cantly compromised by a possible treatment dissatisfaction of patients. To explore determinants and factors of satisfaction with sublingual immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis. A total number of 191 patients with allergic rhinitis who completed a three-year course of sublingual im-munotherapy were included in the study. Of these, 76 had house dust mite (HDM) allergy - 42 men (55.26%) and 115 had grass pollen allergy - 63 men (54.78%) (mean age 27.3 years, SD: 6.14). The patients assessed their satisfaction using a visual analog scale. Health- Related Quality of Life was assessed by Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life questionnaire. A visual analog scale was used to determine severity of the allergic rhinitis. The mean overall satisfaction, compared with that in previous therapy, increased significantly from 4.80 (SD 2.16) to 7.47 (SD 2.05) in the grass pollen allergy group and from 3.42 (SD 2.31) to 7.61 (SD 2.38) in the patients with HDM SLIT (p< 0.001). No relation between satisfaction and sex, type of immunotherapy extracts and duration of the disease was established. A strong correlation was found between satisfaction with treatment and quality of life (R=0.62) and severity of allergic rhinitis (R=0.69) after a three-year course. The results of this real-life study demonstrated that most patients with allergic rhinitis appeared to be satisfied with a three-year course of sublingual immunotherapy. The study provided evidence that reduction in severity of symptoms and improvement in quality of life could determine satisfaction with treatment.

The Survey in Clinical Practice of Sublingual Immunotherapy in Patients with Japanese Cedar Pollinosis using Self-written Questionnaire from First Season to Fourth Season

The Survey in Clinical Practice of Sublingual Immunotherapy in Patients with Japanese Cedar Pollinosis using Self-written Questionnaire from First Season to Fourth Season

The effect of the standard length of the first prescription on the adherence to sublingual immunotherapy for patients with allergic rhinitis.

Poor adherence to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has become a major cause of unsatisfactory clinical efficacy for patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). This study was designed to identify the effect of different first prescription lengths on the adherence to SLIT. The clinical data of 306 patients with AR who started SLIT between January 2017 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the length of their first prescription (group A: less than 3 months, group B: 3 to 6 months, group C: more than 6 months). The numbers of adherent or nonadherent patients in each group and the main reasons of nonadherence were analyzed. Groups A, B, and C included 102, 161, and 43 patients, respectively. The average lengths of the first prescription for group A, B, and C were 62.52 ± 17.63, 102.21 ± 9.22, and 189.07 ± 17.97 days. There were significance differences among the 3 groups (p < 0.05). There were 42 (41.18%), 112 (69.57%), and 37 (86.05%) adherent patients in group A, B, and C. There were 60 (58.82%), 49 (30.43%), and 6 (13.95%) nonadherent patients in group A, B, and C. There were significant differences in the proportions of adherent and nonadherent patients among the 3 groups (p < 0.05). The following reasons were cited for nonadherence to SLIT: the long course of SLIT; inconvenience of getting the prescription; ineffectiveness; side effects; and other reasons. Under certain conditions, 6 months is recommended as the standard length for the first prescription, which can significantly improve adherence to SLIT in patients with AR.

COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF SAFETY OF SUBLINGUAL AND PARENTERAL IMMUNOTHERAPY METHODS

Among a significant number of allergies, the most common among children and adults is pollen allergy. Pollen allergies primarily lead to irritation of the nose and eyes, but can also cause headaches, weakness, fatigue, and decreased attention span. In an acute allergic reaction, anaphylactic shock can occur, that is, a lifethreatening sharp drop in blood pressure. These and many other consequences of allergic reactions imply the need to create drugs that could cure a person of allergies or stop the manifestation of allergen reactions. The aim of the article was to study the safety of allergen-specific immunotherapy. The research methods included an analysis of the comparison of the effectiveness of two immunotherapy methods, a comparison of the safety of sublingual and parenteral methods of administering allergic vaccines, a comparative assessment of the safety of types of allergen-specific immunotherapy. The study involved 228 patients with varying severity of hay fever, among whom were children from 5 to 18 years old and an adult population (113 patients were men, 115 were women). The study revealed that sublingual immunotherapy increases the safety of treatment and is a good substitute for parenteral immunotherapy, especially in children. The studies have also confirmed well-known scientific evidence on the safety of sublingual immunotherapy in patients with hay fever. It was concluded that sublingual immunotherapy increases the safety of treatment and is a good substitute for the parenteral allergenspecific immunotherapy method, especially in pediatric patients, while having several advantages, such as a significant reduction in adverse reactions, high potency, and a convenient mode of administration, greater patient commitment and trust in treatment, and the elimination of infection transmission.

Evidence and Practicalities of Aqueous Sublingual Immunotherapy, Tablet Sublingual Immunotherapy, and Oral Mucosal Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis and Allergic Asthma

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR). Multiple modalities of AIT dosed via sublingual or oral routes are becoming available. This review discusses current evidence and practicalities of aqueous and tablet sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) and oral mucosal immunotherapy (OMIT) in the treatment of AR and allergic asthma. Several large-scale studies demonstrate the efficacy and safety of SLIT. These studies have led to the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) approval of tablet SLIT against grass, ragweed, and house dust mites (HDM). However, off-label use of aqueous SLIT is still practiced as a safe and effective alternative in polysensitized patients. Growing evidence suggests a role for SLIT in patients with allergic asthma. The literature supports the efficacy and safety of aqueous and tablet SLIT for AR, while some controversy remains over the utility of SLIT for allergic asthma. OMIT is currently in the early stages of development.

Comparison of Sublingual Immunotherapy in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis Sensitive to House Dust Mites in Korea.

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using 2 kinds of SLIT medications (LAIS and Staloral) in patients with allergic rhinitis for Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae. We have evaluated the patient's characteristics, safety, and compliance in 293 patients and also analyzed the symptom score, medication score, satisfaction rate, and immunologic measurement in 84 patients who have continued the treatment over 1 year. The symptom scores were significantly improved in both treatment groups, 51% versus 44% (LAIS vs Starloral) at 1 year (P < .05). The medication score was also significantly decreased in both treatment groups (P < .05), 50.8% versus 60%. The subjective improvement score was 44.4% versus 46.1%, and satisfaction rate was 29% versus 40% (P < .05). The serum immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) level was significantly increased in Staloral group (P < .05). The adverse events were 6.2% versus 33.3% and the compliance was 37.7% versus 25.1%. In conclusion, the improvements in symptom score and medication scores were not significant different between 2 SLIT medications at 1 year. LAIS was more compliant, less side effects and Staloral has shown increased satisfaction rate and IgG4 level.