Purpose: Retrospective reports have suggested that 5-25% of patients with reflux esophagitis (RE) at baseline, who undergo repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) following PPI therapy, have concomitant BE—most short in segment length. Given the retrospective nature of these reports, it is not clear how many patients had intestinal metaplasia of the cardia misdiagnosed as BE. We are recruiting subjects with RE into 2 prospective studies, each with different primary aims. A uniting secondary aim is to assess the prevalence of suspected and unsuspected BE in patients with RE treated with PPI therapy for 8-12 weeks. Methods: Subjects from two studies were pooled for this analysis. Study A's primary aim is to assess the role of compliance in GERD symptom resolution in subjects with Los Angeles (LA) grades B, C and D RE. Follow-up EGD was left to the discretion of the primary physician. Study B's primary aim is to compare the percent of subjects with LA grades C and D RE who achieve resolution after 8 weeks PPI treatment (morning vs. bedtime dosing). Follow-up EGD was mandatory. Endoscopists were not informed of the subject's participation in a research study. Subjects previously diagnosed with BE were excluded from this analysis. Results: Study A recruited 50 subjects [25 (50%) male, mean age 56 (SD 15), B=40, C=5, D=5], of whom 10 [4 (40%) male, mean age 58 (SD 15), B=7, C=1, D=2] had a follow-up EGD. To date, Study B has recruited 57 subjects of which 45 [31 (69%) male, mean age 56.8 (SD 13), C=27, D=18] have undergone a follow-up EGD. Thus, 55 subjects (B=7, C=28, D=20, BMI 31.5) have undergone baseline and follow-up EGD after 8-12 weeks PPI therapy and are the subjects of this analysis. Five (C=3, D=2) of 55 (9%) subjects were newly diagnosed with biopsy-proven BE at follow-up EGD [overall 2 (40%) male; mean age 55 (SD 11); BMI 35.3, short (< 3 cm) N=4 (2 male, lengths ranging from islands to 2 cm); long (>3 cm) N=1 (0 male, 5 cm). In 5 (100%) cases, BE was unexpected. The BMI of the 50 RE subjects who did not have BE at follow up EGD was 31.3 (p=0.16). Conclusion: In this prospective study, 10% of subjects with LA grade C or D RE had concomitant BE that could not be recognized during the initial endoscopy in the setting of diffuse inflammation. Unsuspected BE was not found in subjects with LA grade B RE. Subjects with RE and BE tended to be more obese than subjects with RE alone, although this finding did not achieve statistical significance. These prospective results suggest that patients with severe LA grade C or D disease undergo repeat EGD after 8 to 12 weeks of PPI therapy to exclude underlying BE. Disclosure: Dr Alexander - Consulting Meritigae Pharmacia and Wyeth; Research Funding - Merck, Novartis, and Glaxo Smith Kline. Dr Howden - Consultant - Santarus and Takeda, Speakers Bureau - Santarus and Takeda. Dr Romero - Grant/Research Support and Consultant, Santarus, makers of omeprazole/sodium bicarbonate (Zegerid), and Grant/Research Support and Consultant, AstraZeneca, makers of esomeprazole (Nexium). No disclosures for: Drs Jung, Francis, Arora, Grothe, Enders, Dabade, Murray, Farrugia, Kane, Buttar, Crowell, Locke, Wong Kee Song, Wang, Prasad, Sharma, Namasivayam, and Achem, and Mrs Geno, Fredericksen, and Diehl. This research was supported by an industry grant from AstraZeneca funded Study A in this abstract. They supplied esomeprazole. Santarus funded Study B in this abstract. They supplied omeprazole/sodium bicarbonate. Note, they are both referred to as PPI therapy. The names of their products are not described in the abstract.
Read full abstract