Subjective Visual Horizontal Research Articles

Reference ranges and test-retest reliability of subject visual horizontal from different head-tilt angles in young healthy adults

Objective:To establish the normal values of subjective visual horizontal（SVH） under different head tilt angles, analyze the test-retest reliability, and provide a normal value reference for the refined diagnosis and functional assessment of SVH in clinical vestibular disorders. Methods:Thirty-one healthy young people were selected to wear visual reality glasses to test SVH data in five different head tilt angles: upright head position 0°, head tilted 45°to the left（L45°）, head tilted 45° to the right（R45°）, head tilted 90° to the left（L90°）, and head tilted 90° to the right（R90°）, and were re-tested 2 weeks later. Results:①The normal values of SVH at 0°, L45°, R45°, L90°, and R90°were 0.30±1.32, 5.94±5.54, -11.44±5.32, -0.87±8.63, -2.70±8.02, respectively. ②The 95% confidence intervals of SVH at 0°, L45°, R45°, L90°, and R90° were: （-2.34,2.94）,（-5.14,17.02）,（-22.08,-0.80）,（-18.13,16.39）,（-18.74，13.34）, respectively. The ratio of asymmetry in the absolute value of bilateral 45° deviation was 26.4% and the ratio of asymmetry in the absolute value of bilateral 90° deviation was 1.3%. ③The intra-class correlation coefficient（ICC） for 0°, L45°, R45°, L90° and R90° was 0.625, 0.641, 0.564, 0.769, 0.656, respectively. Conclusion:SVH has good test-retest reliability and high clinical test stability and stability. The data on normal values of SVH at different head tilt angles established in this study can provide clinical references for the refined diagnosis and functional assessment of vestibular system disorders.

Statistical Considerations for Subjective Visual Vertical and Subjective Visual Horizontal Assessment in Normal Subjects.

Judgments of the subjective visual vertical (SVV) and subjective visual horizontal (SVH) while seated upright are commonly included in standard clinical test batteries for vestibular function. We examined SVV and SVH data from retrospective control to assess their statistical distributions and normative values for magnitudes of the preset effect, sex differences, and fixed-head versus head-free device platforms for assessment. Retrospective clinical SVV and SVH data from 2 test platforms, Neuro-otologic Test Center (NOTC) and the Neurolign Dx 100 (I-Portal Portable Assessment System Nystagmograph) were analyzed statistically (SPSS and MATLAB software) for 408 healthy male and female civilians and military service members, aged 18-50 years. No prominent age-related effects were observed. The preset angle effects for both SVV and SVH, and their deviations from orthogonality, agree in magnitude with previous reports. Differences attributable to interactions with device type and sex are of small magnitude. Analyses confirmed that common clinical measure for SVV and SVH, the average of equal numbers of clockwise and counterclockwise preset trials, was not significantly affected by the test device or sex of the subject. Finally, distributional analyses failed to reject the hypothesis of underlying Gaussian distributions for the clinical metrics. z scores based on these normative findings can be used for objective detection of outliers from normal functional limits in the clinic.

Factors of significance for the ability of fighter pilots to visually indicate the magnitude of roll tilt during simulated turns in a centrifuge.

During coordinated flight and centrifugation, pilots show interindividual variability in perceived roll tilt. The study explored how this variability is related to perceptual and cognitive functions. Twelve pilots underwent three 6-min centrifugations on two occasions (G levels: 1.1G, 1.8G, and 2.5G; gondola tilts: 25°, 56°, and 66°). The subjective visual horizontal (SVH) was measured with an adjustable luminous line and the pilots gave estimates of experienced G level. Afterward, they were interrogated regarding the relationship between G level and roll tilt and adjusted the line to numerically mentioned angles. Generally, the roll tilt during centrifugation was underestimated, and there was a large interindividual variability. Both knowledge on the relationship between G level and bank angle, and ability to adjust the line according to given angles contributed to the prediction of SVH in a multiple regression model. However, in most cases, SVH was substantial smaller than predictions based on specific abilities.

Evaluation of subjective visual vertical and horizontal in patients with acoustic neuroma based on virtual reality

ObjectiveTo investigate potential differences in absolute deviation values of subjective visual vertical and horizontal between unilateral acoustic neuroma patients and healthy young adults under varying degrees of static head tilt, as well as the impact of proprioception on these values, with the aim of determining the effect of acoustic neuroma on gravity sensory pathway function in patients.MethodsWe recruited 22 patients diagnosed with unilateral acoustic neuroma and 25 healthy young adults and employed virtual reality technology to assess the absolute deviation values of subjective visual vertical (SVV) and subjective visual horizontal (SVH) under eight different static tilted head positions (Head centered (0° tilt), PdP, Head tilt 15°, 30°, 45° to the left and right), then compare and analyze intergroup differences.ResultsIn the Head-centered position, both SVV and SVH absolute deviated values were significantly higher in the AN group compared to healthy young adults. The AN group exhibited significantly higher absolute deviation values of SVV compared to the healthy group when tilting their head 30° left and right. Additionally, when tilting their heads to the right at 15° and 45° the AN group showed significant increases in SVH absolute deviated values compared to healthy adults. The SVV and SVH absolute deviation values of LAN and SAN groups did not reach statistical significance. The results of the SVV test for PDP position did not show any significant differences among all groups. However, the SVH test revealed that the absolute deviation values of the LAN group was significantly higher than that of healthy individuals.ConclusionOur study shows that the gravity sensing function of patients with unilateral acoustic neuroma is affected to different degrees, however, the degree of gravity sensing function damage of patients has little relationship with tumor size. When acoustic neuroma is larger than 2 cm, the effect of proprioception on patients’ SVH outcome is noteworthy. So, we should pay attention to the postoperative follow-up of patients with acoustic neuroma and the evaluation of vestibular rehabilitation effect. Meanwhile, for patients opting for conservative treatment, it is imperative to monitor the dynamic changes in vestibular function and seize timely opportunities for intervention.

The Relationship between the Subjective Visual Horizontal and Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Acute Vestibular Neuritis.

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) and the subjective visual horizontal (SVH) (or vertical [SVV]) have both been considered tests of otolith function: ocular-VEMPs (oVEMPs) utricular function, cervical VEMPs (cVEMPs) saccular function. Some studies have reported association between decreased oVEMPs and SVH, whereas others have not. A retrospective study of test results. A tertiary, neuro-otology clinic, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia. We analyzed results in 130 patients with acute vestibular neuritis tested within 5 days of onset. We sought correlations between the SVH, oVEMPs, and cVEMPs to air-conducted (AC) and bone-conducted (BC) stimulation. The SVH deviated to the side of lesion, in 123 of the 130 AVN patients, by 2.5 to 26.7 degrees. Ninety of the AVN patients (70%) had abnormal oVEMPs to AC, BC or both stimuli, on the AVN side (mean asymmetry ratio ± SD [SE]): (64 ± 45.0% [3.9]). Forty-three of the patients (35%) had impaired cVEMPs to AC, BC or both stimuli, on the AVN side, [22 ± 41.6% (4.1)]. The 90 patients with abnormal oVEMP values also had abnormal SVH. Correlations revealed a significant relationship between SVH offset and oVEMP asymmetry (r = 0.80, p < 0.001) and a weaker relationship between SVH offset and cVEMP asymmetry (r = 0.56, p < 0.001). These results indicate that after an acute unilateral vestibular lesion, before there has been a chance for vestibular compensation to occur, there is a significant correlation between the SVH, and oVEMP results. The relationship between SVH offset and oVEMP amplitude suggests that both tests measure utricular function.

The value of vestibular graviceptive pathway evaluation in the diagnosis of unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction.

Evaluation of vestibular graviceptive pathway (VGP) in patients with unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction (UPVD) has received increasing attention from researchers. The study aimed to investigate the value of VGP evaluation in the diagnosis of UPVD. Ninety-five UPVD patients were divided into attack and remission phase groups. VGP evaluation-related indicators, including subjective visual vertical (SVV), subjective visual horizontal (SVH), head tilt, ocular torsion (OT), and skew deviation (SD), were measured, and their correlations with cochleovestibular function test results were analyzed. The possible etiologies of contralesional VGP (c-VGP) were analyzed. Positive rates of SVV, SVH, OT, and SD were significantly higher, and the degrees of SVV, SVH, and OT were significantly greater in the attack phase group than the remission phase group. The sides with abnormal VGP evaluation results were correlated with the sides with hearing loss, abnormal caloric, and video head impulse test (vHIT) results. A total of 14 patients showed c-VGP, and possible etiologies included contralateral benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (n=4), bilateral hearing loss (n=8), bilateral vHIT gain reduction (n=1), autoimmune diseases (n=6), vascular risk factors (n=6), lacunar infarction (n=3), and endolymphatic hydrops (n=3). Alterations in SVV, SVH, OT, and SD were noted in UPVD patients in different phases, which are presumed to be related to dynamic vestibular compensation; correlations between VGP evaluation results and cochleovestibular function test results indicate that VGP evaluation may be helpful for the diagnosis of the side affected in UPVD; the presence of c-VGP may be related to bilateral labyrinth lesions or endolymphatic hydrops on the affected side; and the involvement of autoimmune mechanisms also deserves attention.

Subjective visual horizontal correlates better with ocular than with cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials

ObjectiveTo examine the relationship between widely used otolith function tests: the Subjective Visual Horizontal (SVH) and Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMP). MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 301 patients who underwent SVH, ocular and cervical VEMP (oVEMP and cVEMP) tests on the same day. Correlations between the mean SVH tilt and amplitude asymmetry ratios for bone-conducted (BC) oVEMP and air-conducted (AC) cVEMP were examined. Diagnoses included vestibular neuritis, stroke, vestibular migraine, Meniere’s disease, sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) and vestibular schwannoma. ResultsSVH results were concordant with the oVEMP in 64% of cases and the cVEMP in 51%. Across all patients, SVH demonstrated a significant moderate correlation with BC oVEMP amplitude asymmetry ratios (r = 0.55, p < 0.001) and a weak correlation with AC cVEMP amplitude asymmetry ratios (r = 0.35, p < 0.001). A stronger correlation between SVH and oVEMPs was observed in patients with vestibular neuritis (r = 0.67, p < 0.001) and SSNHL (r = 0.76, p = 0.001). ConclusionsSVH correlates better with oVEMP than cVEMP symmetry. SignificanceThis finding reinforces the hypothesis of a common utricular origin for both SVH and oVEMPs which is distinct from the saccular origin of cVEMPs.

Visual measures of perceived roll tilt in pilots during coordinated flight and gondola centrifugation.

During a simulated coordinated turn in a gondola centrifuge, experienced pilots show a substantial inter-individual variability in visual measures of perceived roll tilt. Because of the centrifuge's small radius, the pattern of stimuli to the semicircular canals during acceleration of the centrifuge differs in certain respects from that of an aircraft entering a turn. To explore whether these differences may be of significance for the pilot's roll- plane orientation and whether individual characteristics revealed in the centrifuge correspond to those during real flight. 8 fixed-wing air-force pilots were tested in a centrifuge and a high-performance aircraft. The centrifuge was accelerated to 2 G (gondola inclination 60°) within 10 s. The duration at 2 G was 6 minutes. Similar profiles were created in the aircraft. The subjective visual horizontal (SVH) was measured using an adjustable luminous line in darkness. Each pilot was tested on three occasions: centrifuge (2 runs), aircraft (2 turns), centrifuge (2 runs). For each 2-G exposure, initial and final SVH values were established via curve fitting. Despite a large inter-individual variability (±SD), group means were similar in the aircraft (initial: 43.0±20.6°; final: 22.5±14.8°) and centrifuge (initial: 40.6±17.0°; final: 20.5±16.0°). Further, individual peculiarities in response patterns were similar in the two conditions. For both the initial and final SVH tilt there was a high correlation between centrifuge and aircraft. The correspondence between conditions suggests that the centrifuge is an adequate means for demonstrating the fundamental motion pattern of coordinated flight and also for establishing the individual pilot's ability to perceive an aircraft's roll attitude.Findings are discussed in connection with vestibular learning and the possibility of underlying differences between pilots in the keenness for semicircular canal and somatosensory cues.

Modern vestibular tests can accurately separate stroke and vestibular neuritis.

To separate posterior-circulation stroke (PCS) and vestibular-neuritis (VN) using quantitative vestibular tests. Patients were prospectively recruited from the emergency room within 72h of presentation. Video-nystagmography (VNG), three-dimensional video head-impulse testing (vHIT), vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs), and subjective visual-horizontal (SVH) were performed. There were 128 PCS and 134 VN patients. Common stroke-territories were: posterior-inferior cerebellar artery, basilar-perforators, multi-territory and anterior-inferior cerebellar artery (41.4%, 21.1%, 14.1%, 7.8%). VN included superior, inferior and pan-neuritis (53.3%, 4.2%, and 41.5%). Most VN and stroke patients presented with acute vestibular syndrome (96.6%, 61.7%). In VN, we recorded horizontal (98.5%) or vertical/torsional spontaneous nystagmus (1.5%) and in PCS, absent-nystagmus (53.9%), horizontal (32%) or vertical/torsional (14.1%) nystagmus. The mean slow-phase velocity of horizontal nystagmus was faster in VN than PCS (11.8 ± 7.2 and 5.2 ± 3.0°/s, p < 0.01). Ipsilesional horizontal-canal (HC) vHIT-gain was lower in VN than in stroke (0.47 ± 0.24, 0.92 ± 0.20, p < 0.001). Ipsilesional catch-up saccades occurred earlier, and their amplitude, prevalence, and velocity were greater in VN than PCS (p < 0.01). Ipsilesional SVH deviation > 2.5° occurred more often in VN than in stroke (97.6% and 24.3%, p < 0.01). Abnormal bone-conducted ocular-VEMP asymmetry ratio was more common in VN than PCS (50% and 14.4%, p < 0.01). Using the ten best discriminators (VNG, vHIT, SVH, and oVEMP metrics), VN was separated from PCS with a sensitivity of 92.9% and specificity of 89.8%. Adding VNG and vHIT to the bedside head-impulse-nystagmus-and-test-of-skew (HINTS) test enhanced sensitivity and specificity from 95.3% and 63.4% to 96.5% and 80.6%. Quantitative vestibular testing helps separate stroke from vestibular neuritis and, when used, could improve diagnostic accuracy in the emergency room.

Dynamic changes of otolith organ function before and after repositioning in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo detected by virtual reality auxiliary technology: A cohort study.

To dynamically investigate otolith function in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) before, after, and 1 month after repositioning, and explore the possible compensation mechanisms. Thirty-six patients confirmed with BPPV (canal lithiasis) treated in our hospital between August 2020 and March 2021, as well as 36 health controls matched for age and gender (normal control group, NC group) were enrolled. For NC group, the virtual reality (VR) auxiliary static subjective visual vertical (SVV), subjective visual horizontal (SVH), and SVV of dynamic unilateral centrifugation (DUC), were measured at inclusion. For the BPPV group, visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess the vertigo degree, while static SVV, SVH, and DUC were performed before, after, and 1 month after repositioning. First, we compare the deviations of SVV0/SVH0° when the subject's head is in the positive position, and SVV of DUC between BPPV and NC groups before repositioning, after which we compared the deviations in SVV45, SVV90, SVH45, SVH90°, and SVV of DUC between the affected and unaffected sides before repositioning. Finally, paired t-test was used to compare the VAS score, deviations in static SVV0, SVV45, SVV90, SVH0, SVH45, and SVH90°, and deviations in SVV of DUC before, after, and 1 month after repositioning. (Here, 0, 45, and 90° refer to the angle which the center axis of head deviates from the gravity line.). SVV0 SVH0°, and SVV of DUC at 120 and 180°/s 0 significantly differed between BPPV and NC group before repositioning. The deviations in SVV45, SVV90, SVH45, SVH90°, and SVV of DUC at 120°/s-2 and 180°/s-4.5 did not significantly differ between bilateral sides in BPPV patients before repositioning. The deviation in SVH90° was significantly lower after repositioning than before. The deviation in SVH45° was significantly higher 1 month after repositioning than before. The deviation angle of SVV of DUC at 180°/s-0 was significantly lower after repositioning than before. The vertigo VAS score of patient with BPPV continued to decrease after repositioning. Before repositioning, the otolithic organ function of BPPV patients was obviously impaired, with no significant difference between the healthy and affected ear. After repositioning, there was a transient recovery of otolithic organ dysfunction followed by a sustained decline to similar levels to before repositioning.

Effect of age on virtual reality-assisted subjective visual vertical and subjective visual horizontal at different head-tilt angles

ObjectiveSubjective Visual Vertical (SVV) and Subjective Visual Horizontal (SVH) values may reflect bilateral utricle asymmetry. Bilateral utricle static tension balance can be used to evaluate bilateral otolith lesions and otolith-related central neuropathy. Few studies have examined Virtual Reality (VR)-assisted SVV and SVH values at various head-tilt angles across age groups. The present study aimed to determine the effects of age on VR-assisted SVV and SVH values at different head-tilt angles. MethodsWe divided 180 healthy subjects into 6 age groups (n = 30 in each group). VR-assisted SVV and SVH measurements were performed at 9 head-tilt angles (head held vertically, 0°; head tilted 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° to the left/right) in the roll plane. ResultsSVV and SVH values significantly differed with head-tilt angle (p < 0.05). No significant difference was detected in the SVH and SVV values between different age groups (p = 0.632 and p = 0.810, respectively), and no interaction between the age group and the head-tilt angle was found for the SVH and SVV values (p = 0.670 and p = 0.084, respectively). ConclusionThese results suggest that age may have little effect on VR-assisted SVV and SVH at different head-tilt angles. Therefore, VR-assisted SVV and SVH can be evaluated as an effective, fast, and simple way to evaluate utricle function. Level of EvidenceLevel 4.

Immediate Improvement in Subjective Visual Vertical and Disequilibrium Predicts Resolution of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo Following Single Canalith Repositioning Maneuver.

To evaluate whether immediate post-canalith repositioning maneuver (CRM) vestibular changes are predictive of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) resolution. Retrospective cohort study. Tertiary referral center. Adults (n = 27) with posterior canal BPPV. Single CRM with Frenzel goggles. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for disequilibrium, the subjective visual vertical (SVV), the subjective visual horizontal (SVH), and the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB) were administered pre- and immediately following single CRM. Dix-Hallpike was performed 1-3 weeks after CRM to assess for BPPV resolution. Pre- and post-treatment vestibular assessments were compared between groups to determine if post-CRM vestibular changes could predict BPPV resolution. The change in VAS score following CRM treatment was statistically different between patients who responded to CRM treatment (n = 15) and those who did not (n = 12), (-0.07 points versus -2.40 points, respectively; P = 0.03). Likewise, a significantly greater improvement in SVV score was observed for CRM responders compared with CRM nonresponders (0.92° versus -0.06°, respectively; P = 0.02). Change in SVH and mCTSIB scores did not differ significantly between groups. Additionally, patient age was found to predict outcome of CRM treatment, with older patients more likely to experience persistent BPPV (P ≤ 0.01). Immediate improvement in VAS and SVV scores following CRM may be useful in predicting resolution of BPPV and may assist in directing the timing and need for future interventions. Younger age may have a favorable predictive value for improvement following single CRM.

Virtual reality for the measurement of SVV and SVH during static head tilt in healthy adults: a novel vestibular test

Background and objective Few previous studies have used virtual-reality (VR) technology to measure subjective visual vertical (SVV) and subjective visual horizontal (SVH) during static head tilt (0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90°). We propose a novel vestibular test for measuring the normal range of SVV and SVH during static head tilt in healthy adults. Methods Eighty healthy adults were included in the study. SVV and SVH were calculated in nine head positions. Results With head tilt 90° to the right, SVV skewed to the right, and SVH skewed upward. With head tilt 90° to the left, SVV skewed to the left, and SVH skewed downward. SVV was asymmetrical only at a head tilt of 90°. SVV and SVH were similar at all degrees of head tilt, except for 30° to the right, 45° to the left, and 0°. Conclusions VR measurements showed that SVV and SVH differed at various degrees of static head tilt. The standardized protocol proposed here may be used to establish a reference range for utricle function when evaluating acute, unilateral vestibular lesions.

A Portrait of Menière's Disease Using Contemporary Hearing and Balance Tests.

Menière's disease (MD) is characterized by recurrent vertigo and fluctuating aural symptoms. Diagnosis is straightforward in typical presentations, but a proportion of patients present with atypical symptoms. Our aim is to profile the array of symptoms patients may initially present with and to analyze the vestibular and audiological test results of patients with a diagnosis of MD. A retrospective study of patient files. A tertiary, neuro-otology clinic Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia. We identified 375 patients. Their history, examination, vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP), video head-impulse test, canal-paresis on caloric testing, subjective visual horizontal (SVH), electrocochleography, ictal nystagmus, and audiometry were assessed. Atypical presenting symptoms were disequilibrium (n = 49), imbalance (n = 13), drop-attacks (n = 12), rocking vertigo (n = 2), and unexplained vomiting (n = 3), nonspontaneous vestibular symptoms in 21.6%, fluctuation of aural symptoms only (46%), and headaches (31.2%). Low velocity, interictal spontaneous-nystagmus in 13.3% and persistent positional-nystagmus in 12.5%. Nystagmus recorded ictally in 90 patients was mostly horizontal (93%) and of high velocity (48 ± 34°/s). Testing yielded abnormal caloric responses in 69.6% and abnormal video head impulse test 12.7%. Air-conducted cervical VEMPs were abnormal in 32.2% (mean asymmetry ratio [AR] 30.2 ± 46.5%) and bone-conducted ocular VEMPs abnormal in 8.8% (AR 11.2 ± 26.8%). Abnormal interictal SVH was in 30.6%, (ipsiversive n = 46 and contraversive n = 19). Mean pure-tone averages 50 dB ± 23.5 and 20 dB ± 13 for affected and unaffected ears. Menière's disease has a distinctive history, but atypical presentations with normal vestibular function and hearing are a diagnostic challenge delaying treatment initiation.

Vestibular Test Results in Patients With Horizontal Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo.

IntroductionWhile the mechanism of posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is widely accepted as canalolithiasis, the pathophysiology of horizontal canal BPPV remains controversial. We seek to analyze vestibular test results of patients with horizontal canal BPPV with ageotropic nystagmus (AHC) and geotropic nystagmus (GHC) in comparison to patients with posterior canal BPPV (PC) to better understand its pathophysiology.MethodsIn a retrospective chart review of adults with BPPV at a tertiary referral balance center, we reviewed the clinical characteristics and compared videonystagmography, caloric, rotary chair, subjective visual vertical (SVV)/ subjective visual horizontal (SVH), and vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) results between groups.ResultsWe included 11 AHC and seven GHC patients and randomly selected 20 PC patients as the comparison group. All groups had a high rate of migraine and low rates of diabetes and head trauma, but no difference between groups. Ipsilateral caloric weakness was more prevalent in the GHC group compared to the PC group (p=0.02). One of two AHC patients and both GHC patients who had SVV/SVH testing had abnormal findings. The only AHC patient who had ocular VEMP testing had abnormal results. Additionally, we observed a significant downbeating component to nystagmus (4 deg/sec or greater) exclusively in the AHC group (5/10 patients, p=0.001).ConclusionsPatients with AHC and GHC have unique vestibular testing results. In particular, only AHC patients showed a downbeating component to their nystagmus, which may suggest utricular dysfunction in the pathophysiology of AHC.

Subjective visual vertical and horizontal: bucket test normative

Objective The Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV) and Subjective Visual Horizontal (SVH) are convincing tools to assess otolithic organ and/or central gravio-ceptive pathways. This study was undertaken to establish normative of SVV and SVH in different age groups from Indian population. Methods A total of 180 subjects divided into 6 groups 30 each with respect to age (10–20, 21–30, 31–40, 41–50, 51–60 years) were recruited in the study. Testing was administered using the bucket technique. The subject was instructed to rotate the bucket to match his/her perceptual visual vertical and horizontal. The movement of the bucket in the clockwise and counter-clockwise directions made the string tied to the weight rotate freely. This made it possible for the investigator to read the findings on protractor. Results SVH and SVV range between −1 to +3 which is in congruence with the findings of literature. However, there is no significant difference observed across age groups for both SVV and SVH. Conclusion The study provides normative for SVV and SVH which can be considered as reference values to assess a subject with acute peripheral vestibular pathology. The test findings can be grouped with counselling and rehabilitation to improve the subject’s quality of life.

Implementation of a Subjective Visual Vertical and Horizontal Testing System Using Virtual Reality

Subjective visual vertical (SVV) and subjective visual horizontal (SVH) tests can be used to evaluate the perception of verticality and horizontality, respectively, and can aid the diagnosis of otolith dysfunction in clinical practice. In this study, SVV and SVH screen version tests are implemented using virtual reality (VR) equipment; the proposed test method promotes a more immersive feeling for the subject while using a simple equipment configuration and possessing excellent mobility. To verify the performance of the proposed VR-based SVV and SVH tests, a reliable comparison was made between the traditional screen-based SVV and SVH tests and the proposed method, based on 30 healthy subjects. The average results of our experimental tests on the VR-based binocular SVV and SVH equipment were −0.15° ± 1.74 and 0.60° ± 1.18, respectively. The proposed VR-based method satisfies the normal tolerance for horizontal or vertical lines, i.e., a ±3° error, as defined in previous studies, and it can be used to replace existing test methods.

SUBJECTIVE VESTIBULAR TEST FINDINGS IN INDIVIDUALS WITH MOTION SICKNESS

Introduction: Motion Sickness (MS) is one among the most common distressing ailment accompanied with both actual and perceived motion. Regardless of its commonality, very little is known about the underlying pathophysiology. Several tests have proved the involvement of vestibular system in motion sickness. However, there is dearth of knowledge on the expected ndings of Subjective Vestibular Tests (SVT) in individuals with MS. Aim: To compare the SVT ndings in individuals with and without MS. Methodology:Recruited participants were divided into two groups. The group Aconsisted of participants experiencing symptoms of motion sickness and group B consisted of normal controls. To full the aim of the study, subjects were introduced to SVT such as Romberg's Test, Fukuda Stepping Test (FST), Gait Test, Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV) and Subjective Visual Horizontal (SVH). Results and Discussion:The results of the study depicted a good contribution of tests in identifying the affected vestibular system in individuals with MS. Further, about 55% abnormal test ndings in eyes open position for SVV test and 50% for SVH test were obtained. Similarly, eyes closed position yielded abnormal test ndings of 35% and 20% in FST and Gait test respectively. Finally, upon comparison between the test ndings, FST has been situated superior over other SVTs.The recruited tests are known to detect comparatively weaker labyrinth (not necessarily side of lesion) by the observed deviation from the start point in eyes open and closed position. The test results obtained beyond the normative values inherit the presence of otolithic end organ dysfunction in the vestibular system. Therefore, the individuals with MS nd it difcult to maintain the expected vertical and horizontal tilt.

The influence of type of visual image and gender on the perception of horizontality: a subjective visual horizontal (SVH) study

Background The graviceptive otolith function can be measured using subjective visual horizontal (SVH) testing. Nevertheless, more research efforts are required to understand the essential variables affecting SVH. Objective The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of type of visual image and gender on subjective visual horizontal (SVH) perception among healthy adults. Materials and methods In this comparative study, 50 healthy young adults were enrolled. While in an upright body position, they were required to report their perception of horizontality for two types of visual images (solid line and arrow pattern) using a computerized SVH device. Results The arrow pattern produced significantly bigger SVH angles than the solid line (p < .001). In contrast, no significant influence of gender was found on SVH results (p = .743), Based on the statistical outcomes, the preliminary normative data for SVH were established. Conclusions and significance The arrow pattern (a more complex visual image) produced bigger SVH deviations than the simple solid line image. In contrast, the horizontality perception does not appear to be affected by gender. The preliminary normative SVH data gathered from the present study can be beneficial for clinical and future research applications.

Contralesional subjective visual horizontal predicts endolymphatic hydrops

Background: The subjective visual horizontal (SVH) is a test of utricular function that assesses conjugate ocular torsion which is a component of the ocular tilt reaction (OTR). In unilateral destructive peripheral vestibular lesions, the OTR and so the SVH tilt is usually ipsiversive.Aims/objective: Our study aimed to profile the causes of a contraversive SVH tilt in patients with a confirmed unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit.Materials and methods: The clinical records, nystagmus and vestibular investigation characteristics of 52 patients with a unilateral canal paresis (CP) on caloric of ≥30%, a contraversive SVH tilt of ≥4 degrees and at least one pure tone audiometry were retrospectively analysed.Results: The most common diagnosis of patients (n = 39) with a contraversive SVH and ipsilesional CP was endolymphatic hydrops: 35 (67.3%) had Meniere’s disease (MD) and 4 (7.7%) had delayed endolymphatic hydrops (DEH). The remaining 13 (25%) of cases had other peripheral aetiologies or an unknown diagnosis. 16 (30.8%) patients had ictal spontaneous nystagmus at the time of SVH or caloric testing.Conclusions and significance: A contraversive SVH with unilateral CP suggests endolymphatic hydrops.