Subcutaneous Injection In Patients Research Articles

HeredERA Breast Cancer: a phase III, randomized, open-label study evaluating the efficacy and safety of giredestrant plus the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection in patients with previously untreated HER2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

BackgroundHER2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (HER2+, ER+ BC) is a distinct disease subtype associated with inferior response to chemotherapy plus HER2-targeted therapy compared with HER2+, ER-negative BC. Bi-directional crosstalk leads to cooperation of the HER2 and ER pathways that may drive treatment resistance; thus, simultaneous co-targeting may optimize treatment impact and survival outcomes in patients with HER2+, ER+ BC.First-line (1L) treatment for patients with HER2+ metastatic BC (mBC) is pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and taxane chemotherapy. In clinical practice, dual HER2 blockade plus a fixed number of chemotherapy cycles are given as induction therapy to maximize tumor response, with subsequent HER2-targeted maintenance treatment given as a more tolerable regimen for long-term disease control. For patients whose tumors co-express ER, maintenance endocrine therapy (ET) can be added, but uptake varies due to lack of data from randomized clinical trials investigating the superiority of maintenance ET plus dual HER2 blockade versus dual HER2 blockade alone. Giredestrant, a novel oral selective ER antagonist and degrader, shows promising clinical activity and manageable safety across phase I–II trials of patients with ER+, HER2-negative BC, with therapeutic potential in those with HER2 co-expression.MethodsThis phase III, randomized, open-label, two-arm study aims to recruit 812 patients with HER2+, ER+ locally advanced (LA)/mBC into the induction phase (fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection [PH FDC SC] plus a taxane) to enable 730 patients to be randomized 1:1 to the maintenance phase (giredestrant plus PH FDC SC or PH FDC SC [plus optional ET]), stratified by disease site (visceral versus non-visceral), type of LA/metastatic presentation (de novo versus recurrent), best overall response to induction therapy (partial/complete response versus stable disease), and intent to give ET (yes versus no). The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, duration of response, safety, and patient-reported outcomes.DiscussionheredERA BC will address whether giredestrant plus dual HER2 blockade is superior to dual HER2 blockade alone, to inform the use of this combination in clinical practice for maintenance 1L treatment of patients with HER2+, ER+ LA/mBC.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05296798; registered on March 25, 2022. Protocol version 3.0 (November 18, 2022). Sponsor: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Grenzacherstrasse 124 4070, Basel, Switzerland.

Abstract CT113: A dose-exploring, randomized, open-label, Phase I study for toripalimab subcutaneous injection in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Abstract Background Toripalimab, a humanized IgG4K monoclonal antibody specific for PD-1, in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) has been approved as a first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC) by the US FDA in October 2023. This is the first-in-human clinical trial (NCT05751486) to investigate the pharmacokinetics of toripalimab subcutaneous (SC) formulation in RM-NPC and determine the appropriate subcutaneous administration regimen for subsequent clinical trials. Methods Patients with histologically confirmed RM-NPC and without previously systemic therapy for RM disease were enrolled. Eligible patients were assigned to receive toripalimab SC 240 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W), 360 mg Q3W or 480 mg Q6W, in combination with GP for up to 6 cycles, followed by toripalimab SC monotherapy until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or completion of 2 years of treatment. Tumor response was assessed per RECIST v1.1. The primary endpoint was pharmacokinetic (PK) profile. Secondary endpoints included safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity. Results From November 24, 2022 to November 20, 2023, a total of 38 patients (240 mg cohort, n=12; 360 mg cohort, n=13; 480 mg cohort, n=13) were enrolled, the median follow-up time was 6.8 months. The median age was 49 years, and 28 (73.7%) patients were males. PK analysis showed that in the first cycle, the exposure (AUC0-21days and Ctrough) of toripalimab 360 mg Q3W SC regimen was comparable to that of 240 mg Q3W intravenous (IV) regimen (table 1). Objective Response Rates (ORR) in 240 mg, 360 mg and 480 mg cohorts were 100%, 92.3% and 92.3%, respectively. By November 20, 2023, 71.1% (27/38) patients have ongoing responses. No new safety signal was identified. The incidence of Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) was 76.3% with no fatal AEs. The incidence of investigator-determined immune-related AEs was 36.8% with 1 (2.6%) Grade ≥3. Conclusions Toripalimab SC formulation showed similar safety and clinical efficacy with toripalimab IV formulation when combined with GP in patients with RM-NPC. The exposure of toripalimab 360 mg Q3W SC was comparable to that of 240 mg Q3W IV. Toripalimab SC formulation is planned for phase III clinical development. Table 1. PK parameters of each dose cohort. Parameters JS001sc Cohorts (N = 36) IV ref-model based 240 mg SC Q3W, n=12 480 mg SC Q6W, n=12 360 mg SC Q3W, n=12 240 mg IV Q3W, n=1014 Cycle 1 Ctrough, μg/mL GM (% CV) 10.2 (57.1) 8.4 (43.5) 18.6 (50.1) 10.2 (61.8) Cycle 1 AUC (0-Xd), μg•d/mL GM (% CV) 8376 (0-21 d) (39.3) 25316 (0-42 d) (35.4) 14229 (0-21 d) (58.2) 13386 (27.0) Bioavailability 62.6% (25.3%-100.0%) Citation Format: Hai-Qiang Mai, Ya-Qian Han, Guo-Wu Wu, Kun-Yu Yang, Chuan-Ben Chen, Mo Wang, Xian-Ming Luo, Shuang-Hui Wei, Xi Tan, Peng Xue, Rui-Hua Xu. A dose-exploring, randomized, open-label, Phase I study for toripalimab subcutaneous injection in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT113.

EE528 Analysis of Non-Pharmacological Cost Savings Derived from the Use of Fixed-Dose Combination of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab for Subcutaneous Injection in Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in Spain

EE528 Analysis of Non-Pharmacological Cost Savings Derived from the Use of Fixed-Dose Combination of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab for Subcutaneous Injection in Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in Spain

Thermosensitive Microneedles Capable of On Demand Insulin Release for Precise Diabetes Treatment.

As a novel painless and minimally invasive transdermal drug delivery method, microneedles have solved the challenges of microbial infection and tissue necrosis associated with multiple subcutaneous injections in patients with diabetes. However, traditional soluble microneedles cannot switch drug release on and off according to the patient's needs during long-term use, which is one of the most critical elements of diabetes treatment. Herein, an insoluble thermosensitive microneedle (ITMN) that can control the release of insulin by adjusting the temperature, enabling the precise treatment of diabetes is designed. Thermosensitive microneedles are produced by in situ photopolymerization of the temperature-sensitive compound N-isopropylacrylamide with the hydrophilic monomer N-vinylpyrrolidone, which is encapsulated with insulin and bound to a mini-heating membrane. ITMN are demonstrated to have good mechanical strength and temperature sensitivity, can release significantly different insulin doses at different temperatures, and effectively regulate blood glucose in type I diabetic mice. Therefore, the ITMN provides a possibility for intelligent and convenient on-demand drug delivery for patients with diabetes, and when combined with blood glucose testing devices, it has the potential to form an integrated and precise closed-loop treatment for diabetes, which is of great importance in diabetes management.

97P Efficacy and safety of the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: Long-term data from the PHranceSCa study

97P Efficacy and safety of the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: Long-term data from the PHranceSCa study

Anticoagulation Therapy for Pregnancy-Associated Thrombosis: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Objectives: Pregnancy-associated deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a rare disease, and data on anticoagulation therapy are lacking. The present study examined the treatment outcome with unfractionated heparin (UFH) subcutaneous injection in patients with pregnancy-associated DVT. Methods: This single-center, retrospective, observational study enrolled 15 patients with pregnancy-associated DVT treated from January 2014 to April 2021. Results: The median age was 35 years. The median gestation week at onset was 10 (interquartile range is 8-11). All patients presented with painful symptoms with edema. All patients had proximal DVT. Anticoagulation therapy using UFH was performed in 14 patients. The median continuous dose of heparin was 18,750 U/day, and the median subcutaneous dose was 20,000 U/day. During the outpatient period, the values of activated partial thromboplastin time fluctuated wildly, but the fibrin monomer complex level remained consistently low. There were two mild bleeding complications, but neither prevented the continuation of anticoagulation therapy. During delivery, thrombi were not detected in 10 of 13 patients (77%), whereas three patients (23%) exhibited regression without resolution of the thrombus. Conclusion: Anticoagulation using UFH subcutaneous injection was safely performed in patients with pregnancy-associated DVT without serious complications or progression of thrombosis.

Efficacy and Safety of Bortezomib Subcutaneous Injection in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Efficacy and Safety of Bortezomib Subcutaneous Injection in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Preference for the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (PHranceSCa): A randomised, open-label phase II study

AimThe aim of the study was to assess patient preference for the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection (PH FDC SC) in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer in PHranceSCa (NCT03674112). Materials and methodsPatients who completed neoadjuvant P + H + chemotherapy + surgery were randomised 1:1 to three intravenous (IV) P + H cycles followed by three cycles of PH FDC SC or vice versa (crossover) and then chose subcutaneous (SC) injection or IV infusion to continue up to 18 cycles (continuation). Assessments were via patient and healthcare professional (HCP) questionnaires. ResultsOne hundred and sixty patients were randomised (cut-off: 24 February 2020); 136 (85.0%, 95% confidence interval: 78.5–90.2%) preferred SC; 22 (13.8%) preferred IV; 2 (1.3%) had no preference. The main reasons for SC preference were reduced clinic time (n = 119) and comfort during administration (n = 73). One hundred and forty-one patients (88.1%) were very satisfied/satisfied with SC injection versus 108 (67.5%) with IV infusion; 86.9% chose PH FDC SC continuation. HCP perceptions of median patient treatment room time ranged from 33.0–50.0 min with SC and 130.0–300.0 min with IV. Most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1/2 (no 4/5s); serious AE rates were low. AE rates before and after switching were similar (cycles 1–3 IV → cycles 4–6 SC: 77.5% → 72.5%; cycles 1–3 SC → cycles 4–6 IV: 77.5% → 63.8%). ConclusionMost patients strongly preferred PH FDC SC over P + H IV. PH FDC SC was generally well tolerated, with no new safety signals (even when switching), and offers a quicker alternative to IV infusion.

Population pharmacokinetic and exploratory exposure\u2013response analysis of the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer in the FeDeriCa study

PurposeTo characterize pertuzumab pharmacokinetics (PK) in FeDeriCa (NCT03493854: fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection [PH FDC SC] versus intravenous pertuzumab plus trastuzumab); derive individual pertuzumab exposures in the PH FDC SC arm for subsequent pertuzumab exposure–response (ER) analyses; compare observed trastuzumab PK with predicted exposures from a previous SC trastuzumab model; assess whether pertuzumab affects trastuzumab PK; evaluate pertuzumab exposure–efficacy and –safety relationships and support the approved SC dosing regimen.MethodsPopulation pharmacokinetic modeling and simulations were used to describe the data. Standard goodness-of-fit diagnostics and prediction-corrected visual predictive checks were used for model performance assessment. Covariates were included from previously reported models. ER analysis was conducted using logistic regression.ResultsSC pertuzumab PK was described adequately by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption; significant covariates included in the final model were albumin, lean body weight, and Asian region; however, these appeared not to be clinically relevant. Trastuzumab concentrations were described adequately by the previous model; there was no evidence of a pertuzumab effect on trastuzumab PK as part of PH FDC SC and higher model-predicted pertuzumab exposure was not associated with differences in pathologic complete response rate or an increased probability of selected grade ≥ 3 adverse events of interest.ConclusionThe approved PH FDC SC dose [loading: 1200/600 mg pertuzumab/trastuzumab (15 mL); maintenance: 600 mg pertuzumab/trastuzumab (10 mL) and 2000 U/mL recombinant human hyaluronidase every 3 weeks] provides a positive benefit–risk profile with comparable efficacy and safety to intravenous pertuzumab plus trastuzumab.

Fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer: A multidisciplinary approach.

Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab, administered intravenously (IV) with chemotherapy, is standard treatment for HER2-positive metastatic or high-risk early breast cancer. Pertuzumab and trastuzumab are administered over 1-2.5 h traditionally; however, the need for IV infusions places a strain on medical centers with respect to scheduling, preparation, and administration. A novel fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection (PHESGO®, PH FDC SC) can be administered in approximately 5-8 min. PH FDC SC was non-inferior to IV pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in terms of pertuzumab and trastuzumab serum levels in the phase III FeDeriCa study, which enrolled 500 patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. Total pathologic complete response rates were comparable after PH FDC SC (59.7%) or IV pertuzumab plus trastuzumab (59.5%), as was the incidence of grade ≥3 (48.8% vs 52.8%) and serious adverse events (16.1% vs 17.9%). The results of a phase II clinical trial (PHranceSCa) showed that a majority of patients (85%) preferred PH FDC SC treatment over IV pertuzumab plus trastuzumab. A US multicenter expanded access study (NCT04395508) is evaluating the safety of PH FDC SC administered at home by nurse providers in patients receiving maintenance HER2-targeted therapy every 3 weeks. This product takes much less time to administer than IV pertuzumab-trastuzumab and has the potential to alleviate time constraints for patients and busy clinics. In this review we provide an overview of PH FDC SC, and discuss our experience in preparing and administering this product to patients with HER2-positive breast cancer during clinical trials.

Prefilled pen versus prefilled syringe: a pilot study evaluating two different methods of methotrexate subcutaneous injection in patients with JIA

BackgroundMethotrexate is the most commonly used disease-modifying antirheumatic drug recommended in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. It can be administered orally or subcutaneously, the latter method is associated with fewer side effects and higher drug bioavailability. Nevertheless, the pain associated with injection is a considerable drawback of this treatment option in the pediatric population. Currently, there are two single-use subcutaneous injection devices available: the prefilled syringe and the prefilled pen. This prospective, two-sequence crossover study aimed to compare ease of use, frequency of therapy side effects, injection-site pain and parent/patient preference of those methotrexate parenteral delivery systems.MethodsTwenty-three patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, already treated with subcutaneous methotrexate in the form of prefilled syringe in the period October 2018 – April 2019 completed a questionnaire evaluating their experience with this device. Subsequently, children received a one-month supply of pen autoinjector and completed the same questionnaire, regarding their experience with the new methotrexate delivery system. If the patient was not performing the injections himself the questionnaires were completed by the caregiver administrating MTX. The results obtained in both questionnaires were compared using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test.Results82,6% patients and their caregivers voted for the prefilled pen as their preferred method of subcutaneous methotrexate administration. Moreover, the injection with the prefilled pen was reported as less painful in comparison to the prefilled syringe (p < 0.01). Side effects of methotrexate were less pronounced after the prefilled pen treatment, this difference was most prominent regarding gastrointestinal adverse events associated with the injection (p < 0.01).ConclusionAdministration of methotrexate using the pen device is a promising way of subcutaneous methotrexate delivery in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, as the injection is less painful and associated with fewer side effects.

Application of quality control circle activities in preventing adverse effects of subcutaneous injection in patients with cardiovascular disease

Objective To explore the value of quality control circle (QCC) activities in predicting the adverse effects of low-molecular-weight heparin by subcutaneous injection in patients with cardiovascular disease. Methods The clinical data of totally 300 patients with cardiovascular disease (conventional nursing group) who received low-molecular-weight heparin by subcutaneous injection before QCC activities were carried out (from October 2015toApril 2016) and another 300 patients (QCC group) receiving low-molecular-weight heparin by subcutaneous injection after QCC activities were carried out (from May 2016toNovember 2016) in Nanyang City Center Hospital were retrospectively collected. The incidence rate of adverse effects of subcutaneous injection were compared before and after QCC activities, the average length of hospital stay, total expense and the number of compliant were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence rates of adverse effects of low-molecular-weight heparin by subcutaneous injection in QCC group and conventional nursing group were 1.0% and 8.0%, respectively (χ2=17.103, P<0.001) . The average length of hospital stay and total expense were (10.5±2.1) d and (5 134.8±268.4) yuan, respectively, which both were lower than those of conventional nursing group (t=10.067, 33.563; P<0.001) . There was no compliant due to adverse effects of low-molecular-weight heparin by subcutaneous injection in QCC group, whereas there were 12 complaints in conventional nursing group (P<0.05) . Conclusions QCC activities are valuable to some extent in preventing adverse effects of low-molecular-weight heparin by subcutaneous injection. Key words: Injection, subcutaneous; Quality control circle; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine; Low-molecular-weight heparin; Adverse effect

Rapid titration of opiate doses via patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for patients with severe cancer pain

This study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for opiate titration in patients with severe cancer. Eligible patients with cancer pain were randomly divided into two groups, which were titrated with a subcutaneous injection of morphine and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia, respectively. The time required for patients to begin titration to reach visual analog scale score ⩽ 3, the adverse reactions during titration, the time spent by nurses in titrating each patient, and the time to complete the titration with a delayed-release dosage form analgesic effect and adverse reaction. The mean titration time of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia group (1.09 ± 0.82 vs 2.97 ± 1.98) and morphine dosage (18.78 ± 12.32 vs 13.23 ± 8.07) were significantly lower than those in the subcutaneous group ( P &lt; 0.05). The incidences of nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, and sedation in the subcutaneous injection group were significantly lower than those in the subcutaneous injection group ( P &lt; 0.05). The assessment times of the two groups (10.19 ± 3.72 vs 10.25 ± 4.88) were similar ( P &gt; 0.05). However, the time required for subcutaneous injection in patients under patient-controlled intravenous analgesia was significantly lower than that in the subcutaneous injection group (36.36 ± 12.15 vs 132.36 ± 32.79), which was statistically significant ( P &lt; 0.05). After the titration, the controlled release opioid was used to treat cancer pain. The visual analog scale score of the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia group was significantly lower than that of the subcutaneous group (2.44 ± 1.37 vs 2.73 ± 0.91) at 7 days after treatment in the subcutaneous group (1.05 ± 0.30 vs 2.45 ± 1.29; P &lt; 0.05). Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia technique can effectively and quickly complete the titration of cancer pain treatment with less occupational care resources and is better than the subcutaneous injection titration.

Different insulin concentrations in resuspended vs. unsuspended NPH insulin: Practical aspects of subcutaneous injection in patients with diabetes

AimsThis study measured the insulin concentration (Ins[C]) of NPH insulin in vials and cartridges from different companies after either resuspension (R+) or not (R−; in the clear/cloudy phases of unsuspended NPH). MethodsMeasurements included Ins[C] in NPH(R+) and in the clear/cloudy phases of NPH(R−), and the time needed to resuspend NPH and time for NPH(R+) to separate again into clear/cloudy parts. ResultsIn vials of NPH(R+) (assumed to be 100%), Ins[C] in the clear phase of NPH(R−) was<1%, but 230±41% and 234±54% in the cloudy phases of Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly NPH, respectively. Likewise, in pen cartridges, Ins[C] in the clear phase of NPH(R−) was<1%, but 182±33%, 204±22% and 229±62% in the cloudy phases of Novo, Lilly and Sanofi NPH. Time needed to resuspend NPH (spent in tipping) in vials was brief with both Novo (5±1s) and Lilly NPH (6±1s), but longer with all pen cartridges (50±8s, 40±6s and 30±4s from Novo, Lilly and Sanofi, respectively; P=0.022). Time required for 50% separation into cloudy and clear parts of NPH was longer with Novo (60±7min) vs. Lilly (18±3min) in vials (P=0.021), and affected by temperature, but not by the different diameter sizes of the vials. With pen cartridges, separation into clear and cloudy parts was significantly faster than in vials (P<0.01). ConclusionIns[C] in NPH preparations varies depending on their resuspension or not. Thus, subcutaneous injection of the same number of units of NPH in patients with diabetes may deliver different amounts of insulin depending on its prior NPH resuspension.

Inclisiran in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk with Elevated LDL Cholesterol

BackgroundIn a previous study, a single injection of inclisiran, a chemically synthesized small interfering RNA designed to target PCSK9 messenger RNA, was found to produce sustained reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels over the course of 84 days in healthy volunteers.MethodsWe conducted a phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-ascending-dose trial of inclisiran administered as a subcutaneous injection in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease who had elevated LDL cholesterol levels. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of placebo or 200, 300, or 500 mg of inclisiran or two doses (at days 1 and 90) of placebo or 100, 200, or 300 mg of inclisiran. The primary end point was the change from baseline in LDL cholesterol level at 180 days. Safety data were available through day 210, and data on LDL cholesterol and proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9 (PCSK9) levels were available through day 240.ResultsA total of 501 patients underwent randomization. Patients who received inclisiran had dose-dependent reductions in PCSK9 and LDL cholesterol levels. At day 180, the least-squares mean reductions in LDL cholesterol levels were 27.9 to 41.9% after a single dose of inclisiran and 35.5 to 52.6% after two doses (P<0.001 for all comparisons vs. placebo). The two-dose 300-mg inclisiran regimen produced the greatest reduction in LDL cholesterol levels: 48% of the patients who received the regimen had an LDL cholesterol level below 50 mg per deciliter (1.3 mmol per liter) at day 180. At day 240, PCSK9 and LDL cholesterol levels remained significantly lower than at baseline in association with all inclisiran regimens. Serious adverse events occurred in 11% of the patients who received inclisiran and in 8% of the patients who received placebo. Injection-site reactions occurred in 5% of the patients who received injections of inclisiran.ConclusionsIn our trial, inclisiran was found to lower PCSK9 and LDL cholesterol levels among patients at high cardiovascular risk who had elevated LDL cholesterol levels. (Funded by the Medicines Company; ORION-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02597127.)

A comparative placebo-controlled clinical study on the efficacy and safety of interferon beta-1a for subcutaneous injections in patients with remitting multiple sclerosis: results of the first year of observations

To prove the equivalent efficacy of teberif (BCD-033, interferon beta-1) and rebif (interferon beta-1a) in patients with remitting multiple sclerosis (RMS). A multicenter double blind placebo-controlled comparative randomized III phase study included 163 patients with RMS. Patients were randomized into three equal groups (teberif, rebif or placebo). After 52 weeks, the equivalent efficacy of teberif and the brand drug rebif was shown. The result of assessment of the primary endpoint, which was combined unique active (CUA) lesion (the total of MRI T1-weighted lesions and new or newly enlarging T2-weighted lesions, without double counting of lesions with both activities), showed no significant differences (0.727±1.042 and 0.652±1.059 (p=0.7354, t-Student test) in the teberif and rebif groups, respectively. No between-group differences were found for other MRI indices and clinical parameters related with relapses. Teberif was shown to have a favorable safety and tolerability profile comparable to that of rebif. The results suggest the therapeutic equivalency of the drugs and form the basis for using the bioanalogue of interferon-beta 1 in patients with RMS.

SAFETY OF USING METHOTREXATE SOLUTION FOR SUBCUTANEOUS INJECTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Objective : to evaluate the safety of treatment with methotrexate (MT) solution for subcutaneous injections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Subjects and methods . 237 RA patients enrolled in the study within the REMARCA protocol were given MT solution for subcutaneous injections (Metoject) to assess the standard parameters of therapy safety. Results. Overall, adverse events (AE) were noted in 49 (21%) patients. In 30 (30%) of them RA duration was less than 6 months (Group 1) and in 19 (14%) – more than 6 months (Group 2), in most cases average MT dose was 20.9±3.45 mg/week. Elevation of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels, nausea, postinjection reactions, alopecia, rash, infections, and leukopenia, were common (> 1%, but <10%); diarrhea, metallic taste in the mouth, soft tissue abscess/infiltration developing far from the injection site, were uncommon (the WHO term corresponding to 0.1–1%). AE required MT discontinuation in 4.2% of the patients. Conclusion. The results of the study allow discussing subcutaneous MT administration before treatment with biologicals, which makes it possible not only to reduce financial expenditures, but also to improve patient safety

Glargine metabolism over 24 h following its subcutaneous injection in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A dose–response study

Background and aimsAfter subcutaneous injection insulin glargine is rapidly metabolized to M1 and M2. In vitro, both M1 and M2 have metabolic effects and bind to IGF-1R similarly to human insulin, whereas glargine exhibits a higher affinity for the IGF-1R and greater mitogenetic effects. The present study was specifically designed to establish the dose–response metabolism of glargine over 24 h following s.c. injection in T2DM subjects on long-term use of glargine. Methods and resultsTen subjects with T2DM were studied during 24 h after s.c. injection of 0.4 (therapeutic) and 0.8 (high dose) U/kg of glargine on two separate occasions during euglycaemic clamps (cross-over design). Glargine, M1 and M2 over 24 h period were determined in appropriately processed plasma samples by a specific liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. Plasma M1 concentration (AUC0–24 h) was detected in all subjects and increased by increasing the glargine dose from therapeutic to high dose (p = 0.008). Glargine was detectable in 6 (therapeutic dose) and 9 (high dose) out of the 10 subjects and also increased by increasing the dose (p = 0.031). However, glargine concentration (AUC0–24 h – high dose) represented at most only 9.7% (4.6–15%) of the total amount of insulin measured in the blood. M2 was not detected at all. ConclusionIn T2DM people on long-term use of insulin glargine, even with higher doses (0.8 U/kg), glargine is nearly totally metabolized to the active metabolite M1. Glargine is often detectable in plasma, but its concentration remains well below that needed in vitro to potentiate IGF-1R binding and mitogenesis.

Mechanism‐based approach using a biomarker response to evaluate tocilizumab subcutaneous injection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to synthetic DMARDs (MATSURI study)

A multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation phase 1/2 study was undertaken to evaluate the optimal subcutaneous tocilizumab dose that would result in exposure comparable to the intravenous tocilizumab 8-mg/kg approved dose in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A pharmacokinetic and biomarker approach was used to estimate the clinical optimal dose regimen of subcutaneous tocilizumab. Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab were assessed as secondary end points. Patients received subcutaneous tocilizumab at 81 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) (n = 8), 162 mg q2w (n = 12), or 162 mg weekly (qw) (n = 12) for 24 weeks. 88% of 162-mg q2w patients and 100% of 162-mg qw patients maintained mean serum trough tocilizumab concentrations of ≥1 µg/mL, and had exposure comparable with the approved intravenous tocilizumab dose of 8 mg/kg; this resulted in normalized C-reactive protein levels and improvement in ACR20/50/70 responses. The most common adverse events were abnormal laboratory results, which were mild in severity. Anti-tocilizumab antibodies were detected in a few patients in the 81-mg q2w and 162-mg qw groups. In conclusion, coupled with efficacy and tolerability results, the appropriate dose of subcutaneous tocilizumab was determined to be 162 mg q2w for Japanese patients.

Teduglutide for the treatment of short bowel syndrome

Glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) decreases gastric and intestinal motility, reduces gastric secretions, promotes intestinal growth and improves post-resection structural and functional adaptation in short bowel syndrome (SBS). Teduglutide, an analogue of GLP-2, has a prolonged half-life and provides intestinotrophic effects with once-daily subcutaneous injection in patients with SBS. This monograph reviews the preclinical and clinical data that provide the scientific rationale for the use of teduglutide in this orphan condition. Teduglutide increases intestinal absorption and diminishes the need for parenteral support in patients with SBS. The adverse event profile is consistent with the underlying disease and the known mechanism of action of teduglutide. Following its positive regulatory review and approval by the European Medicines Agency and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2012, teduglutide has moved from the research setting to clinical practice, offering a new treatment paradigm for this burdensome and potentially life-threatening condition.