Subcutaneous Group Research Articles

Long-term safety of mepolizumab for up to ∼10 years in patients with severe asthma: open-label extension study

Objectives Long-term safety monitoring of mepolizumab is necessary to support real-world use for the treatment of severe asthma. This Long-Term Access Program assessed the safety and benefit:risk of mepolizumab in pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients with severe asthma. Materials and methods This was a multicenter, Phase IIIb safety, open-label extension study of multiple prior studies assessing mepolizumab in addition to standard of care (Aug 2015 − Aug 2022). Adults/adolescents (≥12 years of age) received mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneously (SC) every 4 weeks until mepolizumab was commercialized. Pediatric patients (6–11 years of age) received mepolizumab 40 mg or 100 mg SC (bodyweight <40 or ≥40 kg, respectively) every 4 weeks. Safety was assessed every 4 weeks and benefit:risk every 12 weeks. Results Of the 514 patients enrolled, 57% were female and the mean age was 51.1 (standard deviation: 14.9) years; 24 (5%) patients were 6–17 years of age. Total cumulative mepolizumab exposure across all mepolizumab studies included in this analysis was 1500.59 patient-years; median exposure was 2.03 (range, 0.08 to 9.97) years. Overall, 37 (7%) patients experienced on-treatment serious adverse events (SAEs): 34/502 (7%) in the 100 mg SC group and 3/7 (43%) in the 40 mg SC pediatric group. Two patients experienced SAEs considered to be treatment-related by the investigator. Infections were the most common SAEs of special interest (9 [2%] patients). Physician-assessed benefit:risk of mepolizumab supported continued treatment over the study period. Conclusions This long-term safety analysis of mepolizumab was consistent with previous reports, with no emerging safety concerns; most patients had a favorable benefit:risk up to ∼10 years. Clinical trial identifier NCT00244686 (GSK ID 201956)

Anti-inflammatory effect of semaglutide: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1RA) receptor agonists possess multiple favourable metabolic, anti-inflammatory effects and their use is associated with marked body weight reduction. More importantly, this drug class has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) at high cardiovascular risk or with established cardiovascular disease. Accordingly, current guidelines recommend the use of GLP-1RA sas first-line antidiabetic therapies in patients at high cardiovascular risk. Semaglutide is a potent GLP-1RA used in the treatment of T2DM with proven cardiovascular benefits. It is currently available in formulations for oral and subcutaneous administration. The anti-inflammatory effect could be one of the mechanisms by which semaglutide reduces cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or obesity. Determining the anti-inflammatory effect of semaglutide was the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods This meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed to detect randomised clinical trials that have quantified the effect of semaglutide on C-reactive protein (CRP) levels compared to placebo or a control group (other glucose-lowering drugs). The primary outcome was CRP index (final CRP/basal CRP). A random-effects model was used. Results Overall, this meta-analysis shows that semaglutide therapy was associated with lower CRP index values compared to placebo (SMD -0.56; 95% CI -0.69 to -0.43, I2 92%) or when comparing semaglutide treatment versus a control group consisting of patients medicated with other glucose-lowering drugs (SMD -0.45; 95% CI -0.68 to -0.23, I 3 82%). The stratified analysis was performed by analysing only the trials that used a placebo group as comparator, When the trials were analysed according to the different dosing schemes (subcutaneous vs. oral), the results were not statistically significantly different (oral semaglutide group: SMD -0.33; 95% CI -0.75 to 0.08, I2 95%); semaglutide subcutaneous dose group: SMD -0.69; 95% CI -0.78 to -0.60, I2 74%); interaction p = 0.098. Furthermore, when the trials were analysed according to the included populations (patients with or without T2DM), the results were similar (patients with T2DM: SMD -0.32; 95% CI -0.51 to -0.14, I2 86%); patients without T2DM: SMD -0.82; 95% CI -0.90 to -0.74, I2 58%); interaction p = &amp;lt; 0.0001. Conclusion The present meta-analysis demonstrated that the use of semaglutide was associated with a reduction in inflammation irrespective of the population evaluated or the treatment regimen used. These findings would explain one of the mechanisms by which semaglutide reduces cardiovascular events.

Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Suction Drain vs. Simple Skin Closure in Reducing Postoperative Surgical Site Infections After Emergency Laparotomy

Background: Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) are prevalent complications following surgeries, especially after major abdominal procedures like emergency laparotomies. In resource-limited settings such as Bangladesh, effective strategies to reduce SSIs are crucial for improving patient outcomes. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of subcutaneous suction drains versus simple skin closure in reducing postoperative SSIs in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in Bangladesh. Method: A prospective, case-control study was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Jalalabad Ragib-Rabeya Medical College &amp; Hospital, Sylhet, Bangladesh, from June 2023 to July 2024. A total of 100 patients undergoing midline exploratory laparotomy were randomly assigned to either the case group (subcutaneous suction drain) or the control group (simple skin closure). Data on demographics, co-morbidities, and surgical outcomes were collected. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSIs, with secondary outcomes including hospital stay duration and other complications. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 22. Results: The SSI rate was significantly lower in the subcutaneous suction drain group (10%) compared to the simple skin closure group (42%). The average hospital stay was also significantly shorter for the subcutaneous suction drain group (8.84 days) versus the simple skin closure group (11.20 days). Co-morbidities such as hypertension and diabetes showed no significant difference between groups. Conclusion: The use of subcutaneous suction drains significantly reduces the incidence of SSIs and shortens hospital stays after emergency laparotomies. These findings support the implementation of subcutaneous suction drains as a beneficial practice in surgical management, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Subcutaneous fast-acting insulin analogues ± long-acting insulin vs IV insulin infusion in DKA: updated meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is often treated with intravenous regular insulin infusion (IVRII). Subcutaneous fast-acting insulin analogues (FAIAs); either alone or combined with subcutaneous long-acting insulin (LAI); might be useful to treat DKA. Our meta-analysis updated on their benefits and safety in DKA. We searched major electronic databases for randomised trials on subcutaneous FAIAs ± subcutaneous LAI vs IVRII in DKA. Primary outcomes were all-cause in-hospital mortality, time to resolution of DKA and hyperglycemia, in-hospital DKA recurrence and hospital readmission for DKA post-discharge. Secondary outcomes included resource utilisation and patient satisfaction. Safety outcomes were adverse events. Reviewers assessed risk of bias and quality of evidence using GRADE. We performed a priori subgroup and trial sequential analyses on primary outcomes. Seven trials enrolled 351 mainly adult patients (255/351) with mild to moderate DKA. No trials studied subcutaneous FAIA and subcutaneous LAI. Their risk of bias was high or unclear in several domains. No all-cause in-hospital mortality and DKA recurrence were reported. No trial investigated hospital readmission for DKA post-discharge. There was no difference in mean time to resolution of DKA (mean difference = -0.70, 95% CI -2.18 to 0.79 h, p = 0.36) or hyperglycemia [blood glucose < 250 mg/dL (13.9 mmol/L)] (mean difference = -0.17, 95% CI -1.10 to 0.76 h, p = 0.72) between subcutaneous FAIA and IVRII groups. There were largely no subgroup effects. Both groups had similar secondary outcomes. Hypoglycemia was the most common adverse event. Quality of evidence was low to very-low for all outcomes. The only possible trial sequential analysis for time to resolution of DKA was inconclusive. There was low- to very-low quality evidence that subcutaneous FAIA did not affect patient-centered outcomes in mainly adult patients with mild to moderate DKA compared to IVRII.

9224 Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Administration of Estradiol by Subcutaneous Injection in Transgender Women

Abstract Disclosure: H. Perkins: None. H. Moreau: None. J. LaBudde: None. W. Craig: None. D.I. Spratt: None. Background: Off-label use of subcutaneous (SC) estradiol (E2) by transgender women for gender-affirming hormone therapy is becoming increasingly widespread, despite a lack of published data regarding its efficacy and safety. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used manual data extraction from electronic medical records for patients ages 18-79 years, currently or previously receiving oral (PO) 17-beta E2 or SC E2 valerate therapy at Maine Medical Center Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility and Gender Clinics between 5/30/14-5/30/23, who completed E2 dose adjustments aimed at obtaining a serum E2 of 75-250 pg/mL. SC E2 was administered weekly and PO E2 daily. Serum testosterone (T), estrone (E1), and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels were recorded if drawn within 90 days of E2 measurement on an optimized dose. In a subset of patients receiving SC E2, serum E2 levels were drawn 1-2 days post- and pre-injection. All patient-reported local or systemic reactions were recorded. Data are expressed as median (full range) or mean ± standard deviation (full range). Results: 45 patients were included with no significant differences in demographics between PO (n=20) and SC (n=25) groups. Both groups achieved therapeutic E2 levels after dose adjustment without statistical difference in mean serum E2 (pg/mL) between SC and PO groups: 148.7 ± 41.0 (78-226) vs. 151.6 ± 31.7 (97-208); p=0.79 by t-test. In patients without orchiectomy, both SC and PO groups had T (ng/dL) suppressed to normal adult female range (10-55) in 11/12 SC patients and in 17/17 PO patients; median T was 14.0 (7.7-86) for SC vs. 20.6 (3.4-42) for PO; p=0.98 by Mann-Whitney U test. Median E2 dose (mg/week) in the SC group was 3.0 (1.4-6.0) and in the PO group was 42.0 (28-84). Median serum E1 (pg/mL) was lower in the SC group than the PO group: 73.5 (29-115), n=12 vs. 907 (596-1601), n=5, p&amp;lt;0.001 by Mann-Whitney U test. E1/E2 ratio was lower in the SC group than the PO group: 0.4 ± 0.1 vs. 8.0 ± 2.9; p&amp;lt;0.001 by t-test. There was no significant difference in median serum SHBG (nmol/L) between SC and PO groups: 71.7 (19.3-146.7), n=15 vs. 73.4 (51.0-187.4), n=14; p=0.20 by Mann-Whitney U test. Mean post- and pre-dose serum E2 levels in 5 patients were 138.0 ± 24.0 and 88.0 ± 57.6, respectively. There was one transient local reaction and no systemic allergic or inflammatory reactions in the SC group with no systemic reactions in the PO group. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that SC E2 at doses of 1.4-6 mg/week can be administered safely to achieve therapeutic serum E2 levels and suppress serum T levels to within the normal female range. Our preliminary data reveal lower serum E1 levels in the SC group than in the PO group suggesting reduced hepatic first-pass metabolism with SC administration; this pattern was not seen with serum SHBG levels. Post- and pre-dose serum E2 levels revealed only a mild decline in E2 levels between injections. Presentation: 6/3/2024

6961 Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Administration of Estradiol by Subcutaneous Injection in Transgender Women

Abstract Disclosure: H. Perkins: None. H. Moreau: None. J. LaBudde: None. W. Craig: None. D.I. Spratt: None. Background: Off-label use of subcutaneous (SC) estradiol (E2) by transgender women for gender-affirming hormone therapy is becoming increasingly widespread, despite a lack of published data regarding its efficacy and safety. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used manual data extraction from electronic medical records for patients ages 18-79 years, currently or previously receiving oral (PO) 17-beta E2 or SC E2 valerate therapy at Maine Medical Center Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility and Gender Clinics between 5/30/14-5/30/23, who completed E2 dose adjustments aimed at obtaining a serum E2 of 75-250 pg/mL. SC E2 was administered weekly and PO E2 daily. Serum testosterone (T), estrone (E1), and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels were recorded if drawn within 90 days of E2 measurement on an optimized dose. In a subset of patients receiving SC E2, serum E2 levels were drawn 1-2 days post- and pre-injection. All patient-reported local or systemic reactions were recorded. Data are expressed as median (full range) or mean ± standard deviation (full range). Results: 45 patients were included with no significant differences in demographics between PO (n=20) and SC (n=25) groups. Both groups achieved therapeutic E2 levels after dose adjustment without statistical difference in mean serum E2 (pg/mL) between SC and PO groups: 148.7 ± 41.0 (78-226) vs. 151.6 ± 31.7 (97-208); p=0.79 by t-test. In patients without orchiectomy, both SC and PO groups had T (ng/dL) suppressed to normal adult female range (10-55) in 11/12 SC patients and in 17/17 PO patients; median T was 14.0 (7.7-86) for SC vs. 20.6 (3.4-42) for PO; p=0.98 by Mann-Whitney U test. Median E2 dose (mg/week) in the SC group was 3.0 (1.4-6.0) and in the PO group was 42.0 (28-84). Median serum E1 (pg/mL) was lower in the SC group than the PO group: 73.5 (29-115), n=12 vs. 907 (596-1601), n=5, p&amp;lt;0.001 by Mann-Whitney U test. E1/E2 ratio was lower in the SC group than the PO group: 0.4 ± 0.1 vs. 8.0 ± 2.9; p&amp;lt;0.001 by t-test. There was no significant difference in median serum SHBG (nmol/L) between SC and PO groups: 71.7 (19.3-146.7), n=15 vs. 73.4 (51.0-187.4), n=14; p=0.20 by Mann-Whitney U test. Mean post- and pre-dose serum E2 levels in 5 patients were 138.0 ± 24.0 and 88.0 ± 57.6, respectively. There was one transient local reaction and no systemic allergic or inflammatory reactions in the SC group with no systemic reactions in the PO group. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that SC E2 at doses of 1.4-6 mg/week can be administered safely to achieve therapeutic serum E2 levels and suppress serum T levels to within the normal female range. Our preliminary data reveal lower serum E1 levels in the SC group than in the PO group suggesting reduced hepatic first-pass metabolism with SC administration; this pattern was not seen with serum SHBG levels. Post- and pre-dose serum E2 levels revealed only a mild decline in E2 levels between injections. Presentation: 6/3/2024

9224 Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Administration of Estradiol by Subcutaneous Injection in Transgender Women

Abstract Disclosure: H. Perkins: None. H. Moreau: None. J. LaBudde: None. W. Craig: None. D.I. Spratt: None. Background: Off-label use of subcutaneous (SC) estradiol (E2) by transgender women for gender-affirming hormone therapy is becoming increasingly widespread, despite a lack of published data regarding its efficacy and safety. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used manual data extraction from electronic medical records for patients ages 18-79 years, currently or previously receiving oral (PO) 17-beta E2 or SC E2 valerate therapy at Maine Medical Center Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility and Gender Clinics between 5/30/14-5/30/23, who completed E2 dose adjustments aimed at obtaining a serum E2 of 75-250 pg/mL. SC E2 was administered weekly and PO E2 daily. Serum testosterone (T), estrone (E1), and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels were recorded if drawn within 90 days of E2 measurement on an optimized dose. In a subset of patients receiving SC E2, serum E2 levels were drawn 1-2 days post- and pre-injection. All patient-reported local or systemic reactions were recorded. Data are expressed as median (full range) or mean ± standard deviation (full range). Results: 45 patients were included with no significant differences in demographics between PO (n=20) and SC (n=25) groups. Both groups achieved therapeutic E2 levels after dose adjustment without statistical difference in mean serum E2 (pg/mL) between SC and PO groups: 148.7 ± 41.0 (78-226) vs. 151.6 ± 31.7 (97-208); p=0.79 by t-test. In patients without orchiectomy, both SC and PO groups had T (ng/dL) suppressed to normal adult female range (10-55) in 11/12 SC patients and in 17/17 PO patients; median T was 14.0 (7.7-86) for SC vs. 20.6 (3.4-42) for PO; p=0.98 by Mann-Whitney U test. Median E2 dose (mg/week) in the SC group was 3.0 (1.4-6.0) and in the PO group was 42.0 (28-84). Median serum E1 (pg/mL) was lower in the SC group than the PO group: 73.5 (29-115), n=12 vs. 907 (596-1601), n=5, p&amp;lt;0.001 by Mann-Whitney U test. E1/E2 ratio was lower in the SC group than the PO group: 0.4 ± 0.1 vs. 8.0 ± 2.9; p&amp;lt;0.001 by t-test. There was no significant difference in median serum SHBG (nmol/L) between SC and PO groups: 71.7 (19.3-146.7), n=15 vs. 73.4 (51.0-187.4), n=14; p=0.20 by Mann-Whitney U test. Mean post- and pre-dose serum E2 levels in 5 patients were 138.0 ± 24.0 and 88.0 ± 57.6, respectively. There was one transient local reaction and no systemic allergic or inflammatory reactions in the SC group with no systemic reactions in the PO group. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that SC E2 at doses of 1.4-6 mg/week can be administered safely to achieve therapeutic serum E2 levels and suppress serum T levels to within the normal female range. Our preliminary data reveal lower serum E1 levels in the SC group than in the PO group suggesting reduced hepatic first-pass metabolism with SC administration; this pattern was not seen with serum SHBG levels. Post- and pre-dose serum E2 levels revealed only a mild decline in E2 levels between injections. Presentation: 6/3/2024

6961 Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Administration of Estradiol by Subcutaneous Injection in Transgender Women

Abstract Disclosure: H. Perkins: None. H. Moreau: None. J. LaBudde: None. W. Craig: None. D.I. Spratt: None. Background: Off-label use of subcutaneous (SC) estradiol (E2) by transgender women for gender-affirming hormone therapy is becoming increasingly widespread, despite a lack of published data regarding its efficacy and safety. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used manual data extraction from electronic medical records for patients ages 18-79 years, currently or previously receiving oral (PO) 17-beta E2 or SC E2 valerate therapy at Maine Medical Center Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility and Gender Clinics between 5/30/14-5/30/23, who completed E2 dose adjustments aimed at obtaining a serum E2 of 75-250 pg/mL. SC E2 was administered weekly and PO E2 daily. Serum testosterone (T), estrone (E1), and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels were recorded if drawn within 90 days of E2 measurement on an optimized dose. In a subset of patients receiving SC E2, serum E2 levels were drawn 1-2 days post- and pre-injection. All patient-reported local or systemic reactions were recorded. Data are expressed as median (full range) or mean ± standard deviation (full range). Results: 45 patients were included with no significant differences in demographics between PO (n=20) and SC (n=25) groups. Both groups achieved therapeutic E2 levels after dose adjustment without statistical difference in mean serum E2 (pg/mL) between SC and PO groups: 148.7 ± 41.0 (78-226) vs. 151.6 ± 31.7 (97-208); p=0.79 by t-test. In patients without orchiectomy, both SC and PO groups had T (ng/dL) suppressed to normal adult female range (10-55) in 11/12 SC patients and in 17/17 PO patients; median T was 14.0 (7.7-86) for SC vs. 20.6 (3.4-42) for PO; p=0.98 by Mann-Whitney U test. Median E2 dose (mg/week) in the SC group was 3.0 (1.4-6.0) and in the PO group was 42.0 (28-84). Median serum E1 (pg/mL) was lower in the SC group than the PO group: 73.5 (29-115), n=12 vs. 907 (596-1601), n=5, p&amp;lt;0.001 by Mann-Whitney U test. E1/E2 ratio was lower in the SC group than the PO group: 0.4 ± 0.1 vs. 8.0 ± 2.9; p&amp;lt;0.001 by t-test. There was no significant difference in median serum SHBG (nmol/L) between SC and PO groups: 71.7 (19.3-146.7), n=15 vs. 73.4 (51.0-187.4), n=14; p=0.20 by Mann-Whitney U test. Mean post- and pre-dose serum E2 levels in 5 patients were 138.0 ± 24.0 and 88.0 ± 57.6, respectively. There was one transient local reaction and no systemic allergic or inflammatory reactions in the SC group with no systemic reactions in the PO group. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that SC E2 at doses of 1.4-6 mg/week can be administered safely to achieve therapeutic serum E2 levels and suppress serum T levels to within the normal female range. Our preliminary data reveal lower serum E1 levels in the SC group than in the PO group suggesting reduced hepatic first-pass metabolism with SC administration; this pattern was not seen with serum SHBG levels. Post- and pre-dose serum E2 levels revealed only a mild decline in E2 levels between injections. Presentation: 6/3/2024

Bioengineered Nanomedicines Targeting the Intestinal Fc Receptor Achieve the Improved Glucoregulatory Effect of Semaglutide in a Type 2 Diabetic Mice Model.

The oral administration of the glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, semaglutide, remains a hurdle due to its limited bioavailability. Herein, neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-targeted nanoparticles (NPs) were designed to enhance the oral delivery of semaglutide. The nanocarriers were covalently linked to the FcRn-binding peptide FcBP or the affibody molecule ZFcRn that specifically binds to the human FcRn (hFcRn) in a pH-dependent manner. These FcRn-targeted ligands were selected over the endogenous ligands of the receptor (albumin and IgG) due to their smaller size and simpler structure, which could facilitate the transport of functionalized NPs through the tissues. The capacity of FcRn-targeted semaglutide-NPs in controlling the blood glucose levels was evaluated in an hFcRn transgenic mice model, where type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was induced via intraperitoneal injection of nicotinamide followed by streptozotocin. The encapsulation of semaglutide into FcRn-targeted NPs was translated in an improved glucoregulatory effect in T2DM-induced mice when compared to the oral free semaglutide or nontargeted NP groups, after daily oral administrations for 7 days. Notably, a similar glucose-lowering response was observed between both FcRn-targeted NPs and the subcutaneous semaglutide groups. An increase in insulin pancreatic content and a recovery in β cell mass were visualized in the mice treated with FcRn-targeted semaglutide-NPs. The biodistribution of fluorescently labeled NPs through the gastrointestinal tract demonstrated that the nanosystems targeting the hFcRn are retained longer in the ileum and colorectum, where the expression of FcRn is more prevalent, than nontargeted NPs. Therefore, FcRn-targeted nanocarriers proved to be an effective platform for improving the pharmacological effect of semaglutide in a T2DM-induced mice model.

Effect of subcutaneous vs. intravenous tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19: a systematic review.

To systematically evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19 and provide evidence for the rational use of subcutaneous tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19. This meta-analysis was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, SinoMed, and Wanfang Medical Network electronic databases up to 11 January 2023 to identify relevant studies. To obtain the most recent clinical studies of subcutaneous injection of tocilizumab for the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19, we also searched the preprint platforms medRxiv and ChinaXiv. Furthermore, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant unpublished studies. The studies were screened based on the PICOS principle. The included studies were classified and evaluated for quality based on research type. The RevMan 5.3 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis, and a descriptive analysis was performed to examine relevant outcome indicators. Five observational studies were obtained, involving a total of 498 patients (240 patients in the subcutaneous injection group and 258 patients in the intravenous injection group). All of the studies were of the highest quality. The meta-analysis of the included studies revealed that the mortality rate of patients who received subcutaneous tocilizumab to treat COVID-19 was not significantly higher than that of the intravenous injection group [23.3% (45/193) vs. 18.4% (39/212), RD = 0.06, 95% CI = - 0.01 ~ 0.13, P = 0.11]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients requiring mechanical ventilation between the two groups [24.5% (35/143) vs. 22% (35/159), RD = 0.03, 95% CI = - 0.07 ~ 0.12, P = 0.56]. The meta-analyses do not provide evidence that subcutaneous and intravenous tocilizumab formulations for the treatment of severe COVID-19 infection differ regarding their effectiveness. Considering that the meta-analyses cannot replace an appropriately powered non-inferiority study, subcutaneous formulations still need to be used with caution and only when intravenous formulations are in short supply. At present, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials of subcutaneous injection of tocilizumab for the treatment of severe COVID-19, and more clinical research should be conducted.

Comparing the outcomes of in-vitro fertilization in patients receiving vaginal, subcutaneous, and intramuscular progesterone for luteal phase support: a three-armed randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe optimal approach to luteal-phase support in infertility treatment remains a subject of debate. This study was conducted to investigate the clinical outcomes, side effects, and patient satisfaction associated with vaginal, subcutaneous, and intramuscular progesterone administration in infertile women undergoing Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET).MethodsThis three-armed randomized clinical trial assigned infertile patients eligible for FET to three progesterone treatment groups: vaginal suppositories (400 mg twice daily; n = 100), subcutaneous injections (25 mg daily; n = 102), and intramuscular injections (50 mg daily; n = 108). The primary outcomes were chemical and clinical pregnancy rates per embryo transfer cycle, with chemical pregnancy defined as beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels > 50 IU/mL two weeks post-transfer and clinical pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound four weeks later. Exploratory outcomes included progesterone-related adverse effects and participant satisfaction, assessed via a Likert-scale survey 12 weeks post-transfer. Statistical analyses included Chi-square tests for categorical data, one-way analysis of variances, and Kruskal–Wallis tests for continuous data.ResultsThe intramuscular progesterone group had significantly higher chemical pregnancy rates compared to the vaginal and subcutaneous groups (41.7% vs. 26.0% and 27.5%, respectively; p = 0.026). Although the clinical pregnancy rate was also higher in the intramuscular group (32.4%) compared to the vaginal (23.0%) and subcutaneous groups (21.6%), this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.148). Additionally, patient satisfaction was greater with vaginal and subcutaneous applications than with intramuscular injections (p < 0.001), likely due to a significantly higher incidence of side effects, such as pain and edema at the injection site, in the intramuscular group (p < 0.001).ConclusionsWe found that intramuscular progesterone resulted in higher chemical pregnancy rates than vaginal or subcutaneous routes, but this did not translate into higher clinical pregnancy rates. Despite its effectiveness, intramuscular administration was associated with more adverse effects and lower patient satisfaction. Future research should explore optimizing progesterone regimens to balance efficacy and patient comfort.Trial registrationThe trial protocol was registered on December 6, 2020, in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT), a primary registry in the World Health Organization (WHO) Registry Network, under the registration number IRCT20141217020351N12.

Efficacy and Safety in a Real-World Study of the New Oral Formulation of Semaglutide in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Background/Objectives: GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as fundamental components in the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients (T2DM) with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The oral formulation represents a novel therapeutic tool but may affect drug efficacy. This study sought to compare the effectiveness of subcutaneous versus oral semaglutide formulations in patients with CKD. Methods: A retrospective study in a real-world setting compared type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease patients, initiating oral semaglutide treatment to a historically matched control group treated with subcutaneous semaglutide. The matching considered factors such as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), age, and sex. Results: Nineteen patients were included in both groups, with a mean age of 68.0. Seventy-two percent were males with a CKD-EPI eGFR of 49.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 and a median urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 12.7 mg/g. Of the study participants, 94% and 79% of patients were on the maximum semaglutide sbc vs. oral dose, while 5.3% and 15.8% were on the sbc vs. oral low dose. Oral semaglutide significantly reduced HbA1C and BMI, identical to the control group (-0.9 and -1.4, p > 0.05). Renal function parameters and blood pressure remained stable throughout the follow-up in both groups. The main side effect was digestive intolerance (affecting three patients in the oral group and two patients in the subcutaneous group, p = 0.6), although the treatment abandonment percentage was similar. Conclusions: The oral formulation of semaglutide demonstrated equivalent effectiveness in glucose control and body weight management in patients with T2DM and CKD, even with a higher proportion of patients receiving low to medium doses. Gastrointestinal side effects were comparable between both oral and subcutaneous formulations.

Prognostic impact of shift to low visceral fat mass after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer.

Based on the JCOG1109 trial, it is suggested that the combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) could potentially become a standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen, alongside the conventional 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (CF) therapy, for esophageal cancer. However, there are few reports on the impact of body composition changes associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy on prognosis. Our study aimed to explore the effect of different neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens on body composition during treatment and the impacts of body composition changes on their prognosis. This is a retrospective study of 215 patients with advanced thoracic esophageal cancer who had surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy from 2013 to 2019. Computed tomography scans were performed before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to assess body composition. Skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) was calculated by dividing total skeletal muscle mass at the 3rd lumbar level by the square of height, while visceral and subcutaneous fat masses were measured at the level of umbilicus. Patients in the lowest 25% of both sexes were classified into the low visceral fat and low subcutaneous fat groups, respectively. Of the patients enrolled, 178 were male and 37 were female. Among them, 91 had clinical Stage II disease, and 124 had clinical Stage III disease. Additionally, 146 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy CF, and 69 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy DCF. Comparing the DCF and CF groups, the DCF group consisted of significantly younger patients (p < .01), a higher proportion of males (p = .03), and a greater number of clinical Stage III cases (p < .01). However, although percent change in SMI and visceral fat mass was not significantly different between two regimens, percent change in subcutaneous fat mass was significant in the DCF group. The major prognostic factors for patients undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer were clinical Stage III, transition to low visceral fat, and response rating (SD/PD), while the specific neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen did not significantly influence the outcomes. This study suggests that prevention of the shift to low visceral fat throughout the neoadjuvant chemotherapy process should improve patient outcomes.

Assessment of the effect of unfractionated heparin administered either by intravenous infusion vs. subcutaneous injection on heparin-binding protein, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in critically ill septic patients: a randomized controlled trial.

The study compared the impact of unfractionated heparin (UFH) administered via two routes (infusion and subcutaneous injection) on heparin-binding protein (HBP) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) levels in critically ill sepsis patients. Forty critically ill sepsis patients were randomly assigned to receive either a low-dose intravenous infusion of UFH (500 units/hour) or subcutaneous UFH (5,000 units/8 hours) for seven days. HBP and PAI-1 were measured at baseline and on days one, two, and seven. Intravenous administration of UFH showed a significant reduction in percentage change of HBP compared to subcutaneous administration on days one [(-35% vs. -13%, p = 0.03*) (*indicates a significant result *p < 0.05, relative to the subcutaneous group)] and seven (-62% vs. -39%, p = 0.02*). Also, the percentage change of PAI-1 was significantly reduced in the infusion group compared to the subcutaneous group on days one (-28% vs. -3%, p = 0.008*), two (-42% vs. -3%, p = 0.001*), and seven (-62% vs. 27%, p = 0.001*), respectively. Furthermore, a significant improvement in the 14-day survival was observed in the infusion group compared to the subcutaneous group (p = 0.008*). Intravenous infusion was the route of choice for UFH administration in critically ill septic patients, with a promising effect on HBP, PAI-1, and survival.

Efficacy of Leflunomide Compared to Methotrexate in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaques Psoriasis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune skin disease. Several treatment options are available including topical and systemic options. Methotrexate was the main systemic medication in treating severe psoriasis, yet adverse events can limit its use. Leflunomide is an isoxazole derivative that inhibits the synthesis of pyrimidines, and subsequently inhibits RNA and DNA synthesis. As available data directly comparing MTX to leflunomide in psoriasis are lacking, this double blinded study was designed to compare the efficacy of methotrexate versus leflunomide in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. The study included 40 patients (25 males and 15 females) with chronic plaque psoriasis. s. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two equal groups, group A for subcutaneous methotrexate injections and group B for leflunomide (loading dose 100mg daily for the first 3 days, then 20 mg daily for 3 months. Disease severity was determined by psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score before and at the end of treatment The treatment response was evaluated at the baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12 PASI score. Both groups were matching at the baseline in aspects of gender, age, disease duration and PASI scores Both medications yielded comparable results with no significant difference between both groups in PASI score neither in side effects. Leflunomide can be as effective as methotrexate in treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Spesolimab in Healthy Chinese Subjects: An Open-Label, Phase I Study.

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare and potentially life-threatening inflammatory skin disease. Interleukin (IL)-36 signalling may play a central role in GPP pathogenesis. Spesolimab is a humanized anti-IL-36 monoclonal antibody inhibiting the IL-36 signalling pathway. Here, we investigated the pharmacokinetics and safety of spesolimab in healthy Chinese subjects. In this Phase 1, single-dose, parallel-group, open-label study, healthy Chinese subjects aged 18-45years received a single spesolimab dose by intravenous infusion (IV; 450mg, 900mg, or 1200mg) or subcutaneous (SC) administration (300mg or 600mg). Primary endpoints were spesolimab exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration); secondary endpoints were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and drug-related adverse events (AEs). Fifty subjects received IV (n = 30) or SC (n = 20) spesolimab (n = 10 per dose group); 60.0% were male, mean ± standard deviation age was 31.5 ± 6.6 and 31.0 ± 6.5years in the IV and SC groups, respectively. Spesolimab exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner in both groups. TEAEs were reported in 83.3% and 80.0% of subjects in the IV and SC groups, the most common TEAE was upper respiratory tract infection (20.0% and 25.0%, respectively). One serious AE of hand fracture was reported in the 900mg IV group that was not considered drug-related. Drug-related AEs were reported in 53.3% and 55.0% of subjects in the IV and SC groups. All laboratory-related AEs were mild and resolved. Spesolimab exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner after a single dose by IV and SC administration. Spesolimab was well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT04390568.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of VRC07-523LS administered via different routes and doses (HVTN 127/HPTN 087): A Phase I randomized clinical trial.

Broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) are a promising approach for HIV-1 prevention. In the Antibody Mediated Prevention (AMP) trials, a CD4-binding site targeting bnAb, VRC01, administered intravenously (IV), demonstrated 75% prevention efficacy against highly neutralization-sensitive viruses but was ineffective against less sensitive viruses. VRC07-523LS is a next-generation bnAb targeting the CD4-binding site and was engineered for increased neutralization breadth and half-life. We conducted a multicenter, randomized, partially blinded Phase I clinical trial to evaluate the safety and serum concentrations of VRC07-523LS, administered in multiple doses and routes to healthy adults without HIV. Participants were recruited between 2 February 2018 and 9 October 2018. A total of 124 participants were randomized to receive 5 VRC07-523LS administrations via IV (T1: 2.5 mg/kg, T2: 5 mg/kg, T3: 20 mg/kg), subcutaneous (SC) (T4: 2.5 mg/kg, T5: 5 mg/kg), or intramuscular (IM) (T6: 2.5 mg/kg or P6: placebo) routes at 4-month intervals. Participants and site staff were blinded to VRC07-523LS versus placebo for the IM group, while all other doses and routes were open-label. Safety data were collected for 144 weeks following the first administration. VRC07-523LS serum concentrations were measured by ELISA through Day 112 in all participants and by binding antibody multiplex assay (BAMA) thereafter in 60 participants (10 per treatment group) through Day 784. Compartmental population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses were conducted to evaluate the VRC07-523LS serum PK. Neutralization activity was measured in a TZM-bl assay and antidrug antibodies (ADAs) were assayed using a tiered bridging assay testing strategy. Injections and infusions were well tolerated, with mild pain or tenderness reported commonly in the SC and IM groups, and mild to moderate erythema or induration reported commonly in the SC groups. Infusion reactions were reported in 3 of 20 participants in the 20 mg/kg IV group. Peak geometric mean (GM) concentrations (95% confidence intervals [95% CIs]) following the first administration were 29.0 μg/mL (25.2, 33.4), 58.5 μg/mL (49.4, 69.3), and 257.2 μg/mL (127.5, 518.9) in T1-T3 with IV dosing; 10.8 μg/mL (8.8, 13.3) and 22.8 μg/mL (20.1, 25.9) in T4-T5 with SC dosing; and 16.4 μg/mL (14.7, 18.2) in T6 with IM dosing. Trough GM (95% CIs) concentrations immediately prior to the second administration were 3.4 μg/mL (2.5, 4.6), 6.5 μg/mL (5.6, 7.5), and 27.2 μg/mL (23.9, 31.0) with IV dosing; 0.97 μg/mL (0.65, 1.4) and 3.1 μg/mL (2.2, 4.3) with SC dosing, and 2.6 μg/mL (2.05, 3.31) with IM dosing. Peak VRC07-523LS serum concentrations increased linearly with the administered dose. At a given dose, peak and trough concentrations, as well as serum neutralization titers, were highest in the IV groups, reflecting the lower bioavailability following SC and IM administration. A single participant was found to have low titer ADA at a lone time point. VRC07-523LS has an estimated mean half-life of 42 days across all doses and routes (95% CI: 40.5, 43.5), over twice as long as VRC01 (15 days). VRC07-523LS was safe and well tolerated across a range of doses and routes and is a promising long-acting bnAb for inclusion in HIV-1 prevention regimens. ClinicalTrials.gov/ NCT03387150 (posted on 21 December 2017).

Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Amivantamab, Both in Combination With Lazertinib, in Refractory Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Primary Results From the Phase III PALOMA-3 Study.

Phase III studies of intravenous amivantamab demonstrated efficacy across epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A subcutaneous formulation could improve tolerability and reduce administration time while maintaining efficacy. Patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC who progressed after osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive subcutaneous or intravenous amivantamab, both combined with lazertinib. Coprimary pharmacokinetic noninferiority end points were trough concentrations (Ctrough; on cycle-2-day-1 or cycle-4-day-1) and cycle-2 area under the curve (AUCD1-D15). Key secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS) was a predefined exploratory end point. Overall, 418 patients underwent random assignment (subcutaneous group, n = 206; intravenous group, n = 212). Geometric mean ratios of Ctrough for subcutaneous to intravenous amivantamab were 1.15 (90% CI, 1.04 to 1.26) at cycle-2-day-1 and 1.42 (90% CI, 1.27 to 1.61) at cycle-4-day-1; the cycle-2 AUCD1-D15 was 1.03 (90% CI, 0.98 to 1.09). ORR was 30% in the subcutaneous and 33% in the intravenous group; median PFS was 6.1 and 4.3 months, respectively. OS was significantly longer in the subcutaneous versus intravenous group (hazard ratio for death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.92; nominal P = .02). Fewer patients in the subcutaneous group experienced infusion-related reactions (IRRs; 13% v 66%) and venous thromboembolism (9% v 14%) versus the intravenous group. Median administration time for the first infusion was reduced to 4.8 minutes (range, 0-18) for subcutaneous amivantamab and to 5 hours (range, 0.2-9.9) for intravenous amivantamab. During cycle-1-day-1, 85% and 52% of patients in the subcutaneous and intravenous groups, respectively, considered treatment convenient; the end-of-treatment rates were 85% and 35%, respectively. Subcutaneous amivantamab-lazertinib demonstrated noninferiority to intravenous amivantamab-lazertinib, offering a consistent safety profile with reduced IRRs, increased convenience, and prolonged survival.

A Prospective Study of Sutured Versus Non-sutured Subcutaneous Fat Tissue in Laparotomy Wound Closure.

Background This study was conducted to determine the wound-related complications, such as wound dehiscence, delayed post-operative stay, and reinterventions in both groups, and compare the incidence of surgical site infection in elective laparotomy wounds in two groups - those with closing subcutaneous fat tissue and those without. Methods At the Government Medical College, Thrissur, 248 patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries during the period from August 2019 to August 2020 participated in this one-year prospective cross-sectional study. The institutional ethics committee approved the study, and participants provided written informed consent. Patients were randomly assigned to the subcutaneous closure group (S) and the non-closure group (N). Post-operative events were then systematically documented. Results The group with no subcutaneous suture (N) had a considerably greater percentage of patients with seromas (12 patients, 9%), hematomas (13 patients, 10.5%), superficial surgical site infection and total wound dehiscence as compared to the subcutaneous tissue closure group (S). Groups N and S displayed comparable numbers of suture sinus developments and partial wound dehiscence. Group N and Group S had similarhospital stays, according to the overall length of stay displayed. Conclusion Subcutaneous suturingduring elective laparotomy wound closure significantly reduced superficial surgical site infection, hematoma, seroma, and total wound dehiscence; in the remaining categories, subcutaneous and non-subcutaneous sutures did not differ significantly. It also did not help to reduce hospital stays.

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of TG103 injection in participants who are overweight or obese: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose phase 1b study

BackgroundTG103, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analog, is being investigated as an option for weight management. We aimed to determine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of TG103 injection in participants who are overweight or obese without diabetes.MethodsIn this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose phase 1b study, participants aged 18–75 years with a body-mass index (BMI) ≥ 26.0 kg/m2 and body weight ≥ 60 kg were enrolled from three centers in China. The study included three cohorts, and in each cohort, eligible participants were randomly assigned (3:1) to one of three once-weekly subcutaneous TG103 groups (15.0, 22.5 and 30.0 mg) or matched placebo, without lifestyle interventions. In each cohort, the doses of TG103 were escalated in 1-week intervals to the desired dose over 1 to 4 weeks. Then participants were treated at the target dose until week 12 and then followed up for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability assessed by the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) from baseline to the end of the follow-up period. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of TG103 and the occurrence of anti-drug antibodies to TG103.ResultsA total of 147 participants were screened, and 48 participants were randomly assigned to TG103 (15.0, 22.5 and 30.0 mg groups, n = 12 per group) or placebo (n = 12). The mean (standard deviation, SD) age of the participants was 33.9 (10.0) years; the mean bodyweight was 81.65 (10.50) kg, and the mean BMI was 29.8 (2.5) kg/m2. A total of 466 AEs occurred in 45 of the 48 participants, with 35 (97.2%) in the TG103 group and 10 (83.3%) in the pooled placebo group. Most AEs were grade 1 or 2 in severity, and there were no serious adverse events (SAEs), AEs leading to death, or AEs leading to discontinuation of treatment. The steady-state exposure of TG103 increased with increasing dose and was proportional to Cmax,ss, AUCss, AUC0-t and AUC0-inf. The mean values of Cmax,ss ranged from 951 to 1690 ng/mL, AUC0-t ranged from 150 to 321 μg*h/mL, and AUC0-inf ranged from 159 to 340 μg*h/mL. TG103 had a half-life of 110–116 h, with a median Tmax of 36–48 h. After treatment for 12 weeks, the mean (SD) values of weight loss from baseline in the TG103 15.0 mg, 22.5 mg and 30.0 mg groups were 5.65 (3.30) kg, 5.35 (3.39) kg and 5.13 (2.56) kg, respectively, and that in the placebo group was 1.37 (2.13) kg. The least square mean percent weight loss from baseline to D85 in all the TG103 groups was more than 5% with p < 0.05 for all comparisons with placebo.ConclusionsIn this trial, all three doses of once-weekly TG103 were well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile. TG103 demonstrated preliminary 12-week body weight loss without lifestyle interventions, thus showing great potential for the treatment of overweight and obesity.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04855292. Registered on April 22, 2021.