Subacromial Spacer Implantation Research Articles

Progress on arthroscopic surgery for massive rotator cuff tears

The surgical treatment of massive rotator cuff tears is a clinical challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. Moreover, tendon retraction, adhesions and fatty infiltration after rotator cuff tear will further increase the difficulty of surgical repair. Therefore, it has become a hotspot and difficulty to repair massive rotator cuff tears with a better way in current research. In recent years, with the continuous development of arthroscopic techniques, shoulder arthroscopic surgery has become the gold standard for the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears, but the adaptations, effects and combined application of different surgical methods are still controversial. The author believes that arthroscopic debridement of shoulder joint and acromioplasty or tuberoplasty could relieve shoulder pain in the short-term for elderly patients with lower functional requirements;long biceps tenotomy or tenodesis is effective for patients with biceps long head tendon injury; complete repair is still the first line treatment for massive rotator cuff tears, but partial repair is possible for massive rotator cuff tears that could not be completely repaired;patch augmentation technology could bring good results for young patients with high functional requirements;for patients with limited internal and external rotation of the shoulder joint and high functional requirements, tendon transfers surgery is recommended;superior capsular reconstruction is more advantageous for young patients with no obvious glenohumeral arthritis, better deltoid muscle strength and higher functional requirements. In addition, subacromial spacer implantation has become a current research hotspot due to its advantages of small trauma, low cost and relative safety, and its long-term effect still needs to be further confirmed.

A clinical case of a combined endoscopic treatment: brachial plexus decompression in the thoracic aperture and subacromial spacer implantation

Background: Thoracic outlet syndrome compression of the brachial plexus in the area between the clavicle and the first rib is a commonly spread and important pathology. It occurs, as usual, after a trauma or due to an anatomical malformation of this area. Thoracic outlet syndrome can be combined with a shoulder joint pathology. In the case of a conservative treatment's failure, the standard surgical procedure is decompression of the brachial plexus in the thoracic aperture. This procedure is usually done via an open approach. The development of the endoscopic surgical technique of decompression allows reducing the risk of complications and recurrences, improving the cosmetic result and relieving the rehabilitation period. Clinical case description: A 73-year-old female patient with a clinical picture of posttraumatic brachial plexopathy and a massive shoulder rotator cuff tear. The patient underwent a conservative treatment for 6 months after the trauma without a significant improvement. To confirm the diagnosis, ENMG and an ultrasound investigation of the brachial plexus, as well as MRI of the shoulder joint were performed. Simultaneous shoulder joint arthroscopy with subacromial spacer implantation and brachial plexus decompression in the thoracic aperture were performed to the patient. According to the VAS-scale (Visual Analogue Scale), the severity of pain syndrome before the surgery was 10 cm, while 6 months after the surgery, it decreased to 1 cm. According to the DASH scale (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand), the dysfunction of the of shoulder joint before the surgery was 76 points, while 6 months after the surgery, it decreased to 12 points. The range of motion in the shoulder joint before the surgery was as follows: flexion 105, abduction 95, external rotation 15, which increased to 160, 165, and 45, respectively, 6 months after the surgery. Conclusion: The results allow us to characterize the method of simultaneous shoulder joint arthroscopy and endoscopic decompression of the brachial plexus in the thoracic aperture as a low-traumatic and effective technique. The technique provides complete brachial plexus decompression in the thoracic aperture which promotes restoration of the function of the upper extremity and shoulder joint, and elimination of pain syndrome from the upper extremity area.

Subacromial Spacer Implantation During Arthroscopic Partial Repair in Patients With Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears Provides Satisfactory Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes: A Retrospective Comparative Study

PurposeTo compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of partial rotator cuff repair (RCR) with and without implantation of a biodegradable subacromial spacer in the treatment of symptomatic irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs).MethodsPatients with MRCT who underwent arthroscopic partial repair alone (PR) or combined with subacromial spacer augmentation (PRS) were included. Patient-reported outcomes, including visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Constant scores in addition to range of motion (ROM) were collected preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Additionally, we determined the percentages of all of the patients in groups that achieved the minimal clinical important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for the VAS, ASES, and Constant scores. Acromiohumeral distance (AHD) was determined as well.ResultsA total of 32 patients were included. Group PR included 20 patients with a median age of 68 years (range: 64-73) and median follow-up 28.0 months (14.0-60.0). Group PRS included 12 patients with a median age of 68.5 years (range: 63-74) and median follow-up of 17.0 months (12.0-32.0). At the final follow-up, the ASES, VAS, and Constant scores were significantly higher in the PRS group (75.5 [55-88.3], 1.0 [0-3], and 70.0 [43-79], respectively, compared to the PR group (55.0 [37.5-65], 2.0 [0-4], and 55.0 [31-79], respectively; P < .05). The only statistically significant differences were found between the PR and PRS groups in terms of the proportions of the patients who achieved MCID for the ASES (70% vs. 100%; P = .04) and in terms of the proportions of the patients who achieved SCB for the ASES (60% vs 100%; P = .01) There was also statistically significant difference between the PR and PRS groups, in terms of the proportions of the patients who achieved PASS for the VAS and ASES ([30 % vs 66.7 %; P = .04] and [0 % vs 50 %; P = .001], respectively). AHD was also improved in the PRS group (8.4 [7-9.5] vs 7.85 [5.5-9]; P < .05). ROM was greater in the PRS group at final follow-up with median forward flexion degree, 140.0° (90°-150°) versus 120.0° (80°-153°) (P < .001) and median abduction degree, 100.0° (70°-130°) versus 90.0° (70°-110°). There was no difference in terms of external rotation between groups (3° [2°-5°] vs 3.0° (2°-4°); P = .4).ConclusionsArthroscopic partial RCR with implantation of a subacromial spacer leads to satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with symptomatic irreparable MRCT compared with patients treated with partial repair alone.Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative study.

Subacromial spacer implantation: an alternative to arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction. A systematic review.

This systematic review evaluated and compared the use of a subacromial spacer implantation (SSI) with arthroscopic superior capsular repair (ASCR) in the management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) with an assessment of clinical and imaging outcomes. This systematic review was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched in PubMed, Medline and Embase database literature using the keywords 'subacromial spacer', 'subacromial balloon', 'subacromial device', 'arthroscopy', 'superior capsular reconstruction', 'irreparable rotator cuff tears', 'satisfaction' and 'quality of life'. We included a total of 29 articles (14 about SSI and 15 about ASCR) dealing with outcomes, satisfaction and patients' quality of life. The use of a subacromial spacer showed similar results in terms of patients' satisfaction and quality of life when compared with ASCR. SSI can be implanted quickly and has a low complication rate. It can therefore be considered a good alternative for the management of MIRCTs. The subacromial spacer is a biodegradable implant easily implanted at arthroscopy. It can lead good clinical and imaging outcomes in MIRCTs. Similarly, ASCR can be performed with either an autograft or synthetic allograft transplantation, with satisfactory results. Long-term prospective studies are needed to compare SSI and ASCR to verify their effectiveness.

Biceps Tenotomy Does not Affect the Functional Outcomes of Patients Treated with Spacer Implantation Due to Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

Background:Lesions of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon are frequently associated with massive rotator cuff tears (RCT) and may be responsible for shoulder pain and disability.Objective:This study aimed to evaluate functional outcomes of arthroscopic biodegradable spacer implantation with or without biceps tenotomy as treatment for persistent shoulder dysfunction and pain due to a massive irreparable RCT.Methods:A total of 48 patients were implanted with the subacromial spacer using arthroscopic approach with or without biceps tenotomy. All patients were assessed for up to 12 months post-implantation and 18 patients were assessed for at least 24 months (and a maximum of 40 months). Improvement in shoulder function was assessed using Constant score.Results:Subacromial spacer implantation was performed arthroscopically in 48 patients. The mean total Constant score increased from 36 at baseline to 67 points at 12 months post implantation. Patients who underwent LHB tenotomy in addition to the subacromial spacer presented similar improvement of their shoulder function and score compared to the group that was treated with the spacer alone.Conclusion:Current study demonstrates that spacer implantation in this patient population provides significant improvement in function and decreases the pain. Additional LHB tenotomy did not influence the postoperative results during the follow-up.

Erratum to: Subacromial spacer implantation for massive rotator cuff tears

Erratum to: Subacromial spacer implantation for massive rotator cuff tears