We studied a revised and updated population of 93 large volcanoes on Venus using a combined topographic and morphologic analyses, which permits characterization of their general shapes and determination of their diameters. Our study has allowed the establishment of two distinctive types of the volcano shapes (complanate and cone-shaped) and stratigraphic ages of the volcanoes. The complanate volcanoes are significantly larger, the mean diameter (D) is ~500 km and have lower aspect ratio ((h/D)*1000 = ~2.4). The cone-shaped volcanoes are systematically smaller (D = ~150–300 km) and have higher aspect ratio, ~6. There is a pronounced gap in the size-frequency distribution (SFD) of the central volcanoes on Venus that separates the older and smaller edifices of shield plains (mean diameter of entire population is ~9 km) from the younger large volcanoes (mean diameter of entire population is ~280 km). Such a bimodality in the SFD suggests the existence of two different global volcanic environments during the formation of the older, and younger, populations of central volcanoes. The stratigraphy of the large volcanoes indicates that they represent the later stages of volcanic activity on Venus that characterized the end of the Guinevereian (the smaller cone-shaped volcanoes in association with the upper unit of regional plains, rp2) and the entire Atlian periods (the complanate and larger cone-shaped volcanoes in association with the younger lobate plains, pl). Transitional volcanoes that show both units are rare. The older rp2-volcanoes comprise only ~7 % of the total area of unit rp2. This suggests that the mode of formation of rp2 was significantly shifted toward the emplacement of areally distributed lava flows. In contrast, the pl-volcanoes make up ~40 % of lobate plains, which implies that the formation of volcanoes of the central type was an important component of volcanic style of lobate plains. The spatial association of most of the pl-volcanoes with the dome-shaped rises suggests that this change was related to the further focusing of central, large edifice volcanism over a few sites, perhaps representing a change in the nature of mantle source regions (e.g., more plume-like).
Read full abstract