Study Sponsor Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of tezepelumab versus placebo in adults with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COURSE): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial.

Tezepelumab is a human monoclonal antibody that blocks thymic stromal lymphopoietin, which has shown increased expression in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared with healthy individuals. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tezepelumab in patients with moderate to very severe COPD despite receiving triple inhaled therapy. COURSE was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial across 90 sites in ten countries in Asia, Europe, and North America. Eligible participants were aged 40-80 years, had moderate to very severe airflow limitation, were receiving triple inhaled maintenance therapy, and had at least two moderate to severe COPD exacerbations in the 12 months before enrolment. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive tezepelumab 420 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks for up to 52 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region and by number of exacerbations in the 12 months before enrolment. Participants, investigators, site staff, and the study sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the annualised rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations over 52 weeks. A prespecified subgroup analysis assessed the primary endpoint in patients grouped by baseline blood eosinophil counts (BECs). Efficacy and safety were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04039113 (completed). Between July 30, 2019, and Oct 4, 2022, 333 patients (mean age 67·2 years [SD 7·0]; 145 [44%] female and 188 [56%] male; 293 [88%] White, 34 [10%] Asian, and four [1%] Black or African American) were randomly assigned and treated with tezepelumab (n=165) or placebo (n=168). The annualised rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations over 52 weeks was 1·75 for tezepelumab versus 2·11 for placebo (rate ratio 0·83 [90% CI 0·64-1·06]; p=0·10 [one-sided]; the primary endpoint was not met). In prespecified subgroup analyses, the annualised rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations over 52 weeks was 2·04 with tezepelumab versus 1·71 with placebo (rate ratio 1·19 [95% CI 0·75-1·90]) in patients with a baseline BEC of less than 150 cells per μL, 1·64 versus 2·47 (0·66 [0·42-1·04]) in patients with a baseline BEC of 150 cells per μL to less than 300 cells per μL, and 1·20 versus 2·24 (0·54 [0·25-1·15]) in patients with a baseline BEC of 300 cells per μL or higher. Adverse events occurred in 133 (81%) of 165 patients in the tezepelumab group and 126 (75%) of 168 patients in the placebo group. Serious adverse events occurred in 49 (30%) patients in the tezepelumab group and 50 (30%) patients in the placebo group. Five patients died while receiving study treatment: two in the tezepelumab group and three in the placebo group. No deaths were determined to be causally related to study treatment by investigator assessment. A significant reduction was not observed in the annualised rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations with tezepelumab versus placebo. Further studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of tezepelumab in patients with moderate to very severe COPD, particularly in patients with a baseline BEC of 150 cells per μL or higher. Tezepelumab was well tolerated, with no safety concerns identified. AstraZeneca and Amgen.

Country-specific psychopharmacological risk of reporting suicidality comparing 38 antidepressants and lithium from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, 2017-2023.

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) maintains a black-box warning for antidepressants warning of an increased risk of suicidality in children and young adults that is based on proprietary clinical trial data from study sponsors that were submitted for regulatory approval. This article aimed to assess whether the black-box warning for antidepressants is still valid today using recent drug safety data. Post-marketing adverse drug event data were obtained from the US FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for the years 2017 through 2023. Logistic regression analysis was conducted using the case versus non-case methodology and adjusted for gender, age group, drug role (primary drug, secondary drug, interacting drug, and concomitant drug), initial FDA reporting year, reporter country, and a drug*gene*age group interaction. In the multivariate analysis, compared to fluoxetine and patients aged 25 to 64 years, children [adjusted reporting odds ratio (aROR) = 7.38, 95% CI, 6.02-9.05] and young adults (aROR = 3.49, 95% CI, 2.65-4.59) were associated with an increased risk of reporting suicidality, but not for the elderly (aROR = 0.76, 95% CI, 0.53-1.09). Relative to fluoxetine, esketamine was associated with the highest rate of reporting suicidality in children (aROR = 3.20, 95% CI, 2.25-4.54); however, esketamine was associated with a lower risk of reporting suicidality in young adults (aROR = 0.59, 95% CI, 0.41-0.84), but not significantly in the elderly (aROR = 0.77, 95% CI, 0.48-1.23). For country-specific findings, relative to the USA, the Slovak Republic, India, and Canada had the lowest risk of reporting suicidality. For the overall study population, desvenlafaxine (aROR = 0.61, 95% CI, 0.46-0.81) and vilazodone (aROR = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.32-0.99) were the only two antidepressants associated with a reduced risk of reporting suicidality. This study shows that with recent antidepressant drug safety data, the US FDA's black-box warning for prescribing antidepressants to children and young adults is valid today in the USA. However, relative to the USA, 15 countries had a significantly lower risk of reporting suicidality, while 16 countries had a higher risk of reporting suicidality from 38 antidepressants and lithium.

Managing a 4000-participant cohort with a novel mobile app: data from the RisCoin study in Germany

Abstract Issue RisCoin, a prospective monocentric longitudinal observational study, aimed to identify risk factors for COVID-19 vaccine failure. Secondary aim is to monitor symptoms, SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccination status of 3816 enrolled healthcare workers (HCW) and 180 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Since the LMU University Hospital Munich served both as study sponsor and employer of the HCW, a secured approach was required. Description of the solution Participants accessed the study app (CentraXX, KAIROS GmbH, Germany) via pseudonymized Contact-ID with irreversible anonymization after 6 months. Key app features were the serological results report, bidirectional messaging, and weekly survey for self-reported data on vaccinations, infections, and symptoms. Active app use was defined as submitting >1 weekly survey during the study period 10.2021-12.2022. Results Over 15 months, our study team maintained 1964 two-way communications with 958 participants via the app. Of 3979 participants with app access, 3622 (91%) were active users, 2606 (65%) submitted 1 to 11 surveys, 1016 (26%) made ≥12 submissions (P75, “frequent users”). Frequent users were more likely to be IBD patients (p = 0.001), female (p < 0.001), aged 60 or older (p < 0.001). Staff in administration and nurses were more likely to be frequent users compared to physicians (p < 0.001). Main problems included the initial operational system disparities resulting in app crashes and continuous need for app reactivation. Both led to loss of active participants and required substantial staff resources to onboard and support participants during the study. Lessons The study app enabled secure, flexible, bidirectional communication with all participants. Despite technical issues, the majority actively used the app and provided valuable longitudinal data through weekly survey submissions. Key messages • A study-specific app provides a flexible and secure bidirectional anonymous communication for the study team and participants. • Adherence to app-based communication and data collection for pandemic monitoring was particularly high among patients, nurses and administrative staff.

The Oncology QCARD Initiative: Fostering efficient evaluation of initial real-world data proposals.

The oncology quality, characterization, and assessment of real-world data (Oncology QCARD) Initiative was formed to develop a set of minimum study design and data elements needed to evaluate the fitness of the real-world data (RWD) source(s) proposed in an initial study concept as part of early interaction with scientific reviewers. A multidisciplinary executive committee (EC) was established to guide the Oncology QCARD Initiative. The EC conducted a landscape review of published literature, guidances, and guidelines to evaluate relevant dimensions of data quality measurement. Guided by the review and informed by expert feedback, the Oncology QCARD Initial Protocol Characterization (IPC) provides a summary of minimum elements needed to adequately describe an initial clinical study concept that involves RWD and is intended to support decision-making. Fit-for-use data and fit-for-purpose design emerged as themes from the landscape analysis. Data that are fit-for-use are both relevant (sufficiently capturing exposure, outcomes, and covariates) and reliable (understanding data accrual and quality control and whether the data represent the underlying concepts they are intended to represent) to answer a specific research question. A fit-for-purpose design takes appropriate steps to ensure internal and external validity and allows for transparency in reporting. The QCARD-IPC focuses on high-level characteristics of RWD sources and study design domains including data temporality, population, medical product exposure, comparators, and covariates, endpoints, statistical analysis, and data quality assurance plans. Evaluation of studies including RWD requires understanding the data source, study design, and potential biases to preliminarily evaluate whether selected RWD are fit-for-use for the research question. The Oncology QCARD-IPC provides a structured, transparent approach to facilitate early review and enhanced communication between study sponsors and scientific reviewers of initial study proposals including RWD.

The Development and Content Validation of the Sjögren's Related Quality of Life Instrument (SRQoL).

Several clinical outcome assessment (COA) instruments assess Sjögren's disease (Sjögren's) symptoms, but do not provide comprehensive assessment of the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impact of Sjögren's. This study aimed to develop a patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for the assessment of HRQoL, intended for use in clinical trials and clinical practice in the assessment of treatment benefit. Review of study sponsor proprietary data and qualitative interviews informed the development of a conceptual model, the Sjögren's Related Quality of Life (SRQoL) and patient global impression of severity (PGI-S) and change (PGI-C) items. Combined concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews with patients with Sjögren's explored their HRQoL impact experience and content validity of the SRQoL and PGI items. Twenty participants were interviewed about their Sjögren's experience. Following inductive analysis of interviews, concepts were categorized into eight domains: emotional well-being (e.g., worry and stress; n = 20/20; 100%), sleep (e.g., daytime sleepiness and waking up during the night; n = 20/20; 100%), activities of daily living (e.g., difficulty looking at screens and difficulty driving; n = 20/20; 100%), cognition (e.g., concentration difficulties and word finding difficulties; n = 19/20; 95.0%), physical functioning (e.g., difficulty walking and difficulty exercising; n = 19/20; 95.0%), social and family functioning (e.g., dependent on others and relationship difficulties; n = 17/20; 85.0%), work (n = 15/20; 75.0%), and sexual functioning (n = 12/20; 60.0%). SRQoL and PGI items, instructions, response options, and recall period were well understood and relevant to participants. The SRQoL is a new PRO instrument to assess Sjögren's impact on HRQoL, developed in accordance with regulatory guidance. This study provides considerable insight into the patient experience of Sjögren's and evidence to support the content validity of the SRQoL. Future research should evaluate the psychometric properties of the SRQoL to support its use in clinical trials and clinical practice and further validate its use as an assessment of treatment benefit.

Toxicity surveillance in FDA pivotal registration trials for immune checkpoint inhibitors: Are we missing the mark?

215 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the treatment landscape for a multitude of malignancies, leading to prolonged survival and durable responses. Despite this, a significant number of patients will develop immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with significant associated morbidity and mortality. A retrospective study has previously demonstrated that 28% of patients can develop IrAEs from 6 months up to 2 years after starting therapy (1). Surveillance for toxicity is essential for understanding the long-term risk associated with ICIs. We aimed to analyze the reporting timeframes used in clinical trials of immuno-oncology agents leading to FDA approval. Methods: In this retrospective study, we interrogated the HemeOnc knowledgebase to curate a list of all clinical trial publications leading to FDA approval from 2011 to 2024. We manually selected from this list any trial including an immune checkpoint inhibitor either as monotherapy or in combination with another systemic therapy. The adverse event follow-up time was then extrapolated by manually reviewing the trial publication, supplemental materials or the trial protocol depending on where this information was listed. All trials were categorized based on trial initiation dates. Results: We identified 175 clinical trials leading to FDA approvals, with trial initiation dates ranging from 2004 to 2019. 165 trials were included in the analysis with 10 being excluded due to lack of language regarding follow-up. 62% of the trials included were Phase III trials with the remaining 38% Phase I/II trials. The median follow-up days for all trials across this timeframe was 90, with a range of 28 to 135. The median follow-up time for AE monitoring increased by nearly 30%, rising from 70 days in 2004 to 90 days in 2013. Subsequently, we observed a consistent median follow-up time of 90 days (28 to 130 days) from that point onward, with no further increase. Conclusions: To our knowledge this is the first systematic review of IrAE monitoring in clinical trials leading to FDA approval. In our study we revealed that, despite advancements in the understanding of IrAEs and their potential for late presentation, registration trials leading to regulatory approval remain inadequately designed to capture chronic and delayed immunotherapy toxicities. As these therapies advance into earlier stages of disease with longer life expectancy, it will be critical for regulatory bodies, study sponsors, and trial investigators to either redesign clinical trials or for there to be an alternative method that comprehensively captures the incidence and pattern of late-presenting toxicities. 1. Durbin, ASCO 2023.

Regulatory Pathways for Qualification andAcceptance of Digital Health Technology-Derived Clinical Trial Endpoints: Considerations for Sponsors.

Despite widespread interest and substantial investment in the adoption of sensor-based digital health technologies (sDHTs) for remote data capture in drug development trials, no drug has been approved based on an sDHT-derived primary endpoint in the United States (US). One reason for this lack of advancement is the complexity of obtaining regulatory endorsement for those endpoints within current US regulatory pathways. The goal of our review is to describe the two choices currently available to pharmaceutical study Sponsors: (i) they may navigate the traditional route of compiling the evidence to support the sDHT-derived endpoint in their investigational new drug (IND) application, requiring specific expertise and substantial resources; or (ii) they may navigate the drug development tool (DDT) pathway with the goal of qualifying their sDHT-derived endpoint as a biomarker or clinical outcome assessment applicable to a broader context of use (COU), either alone or as part of a partnership or consortium. We describe the nuances of each pathway; the evidentiary requirements for supporting an sDHT-derived endpoint and the technology used to capture it; and the impact that an sDHT's regulatory status may have on a Sponsor's decision to use it for data capture. By systematically comparing the IND and DDT pathways, our over-arching goals are to support the increasing deployment of sDHTs within the clinical research setting and help advance regulatory science in the field of digital medicine.

Immunogenicity and safety of an 18-month booster dose of the VLA15 Lyme borreliosis vaccine candidate after primary immunisation in healthy adults in the USA: results of the booster phase of a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial

Incidence rates of Lyme borreliosis, a tickborne disease attributed to infection by Borrelia species, are increasing, and limitations to existing treatments potentiate the possibility of severe outcomes. Nevertheless, there are no licensed vaccines for Lyme borreliosis prevention in humans. This study investigated the immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose of VLA15, an investigational outer surface protein A (OspA)-based Lyme borreliosis vaccine that has previously shown safety and immunogenicity when administered as a primary vaccination series, following a primary VLA15 vaccination series. We report the results of the booster phase of a randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 2 study that enrolled healthy adults aged 18-65 years from five US clinical study centres to receive 135 μg or 180 μg VLA15 or placebo at months 0, 2, and 6 in the main study phase. Participants who received 180 μg VLA15 in the main study phase and did not have relevant protocol deviations were eligible for the booster phase (months 18-30). Participants were randomly reassigned (2:1) to receive an intramuscular injection of a VLA15 booster or placebo 1 year after the completion of primary vaccination (month 18) via a randomisation list generated by an unmasked statistician with a block size of six. Individuals involved in data safety monitoring, rerandomisation, vaccine handling, and vaccine accountability were unmasked; the study sponsor and statisticians were only unmasked after analysis of data up to 1 month after booster administration. All other individuals remained masked throughout the booster phase. The outcomes for the booster phase were the immunogenicity (evaluated in the booster per-protocol population) and safety (evaluated for all participants who received the booster) of the booster dose up to month 30. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03970733) and is completed. Between Feb 4 and March 23, 2021, 58 participants (28 men and 30 women) were screened, randomly assigned, and received VLA15 (n=39) or placebo (n=19). One participant in the placebo group was lost to follow-up. The IgG geometric mean titres for each OspA serotype (serotypes 1-6) in the VLA15 group peaked at 1 month after the booster dose (1277·0 U/mL [95% CI 861·8-1892·3] to 2194·5 U/mL [1566·8-3073·7] vs 23·6 U/mL [18·1-30·8] to 36·8 U/mL [26·4-51·3] in the placebo group [p<0·0001 for all serotypes]), remained elevated at month 24 (137·4 U/mL [95·8-196·9] to 265·8 U/mL [202·9-348·2] vs 22·3 U/mL [17·7-28·0] to 29·1 U/mL [20·8-40·6] in the placebo group; p<0·0001 for all serotypes), and declined by month 30 (54·1 U/mL [38·6-75·7] to 101·6 U/mL [77·6-133·1] vs 21·9 U/mL [18·0-26·6] to 24·9 U/mL [19·0-32·6] in the placebo group; p<0·0001 for all serotypes except serotype 1 [p=0·0006]). Solicited local adverse events were reported more frequently in the VLA15 group (35 [92%, 95% CI 79-97] of 38 participants) than the placebo group (six [32%, 15-54] of 19 participants; p<0·0001) after booster vaccination. There was no significant difference in the frequency of solicited systemic adverse events between groups (20 [59%, 42-74] of 34 participants in the VLA15 group vs six [38%, 18-61] of 16 participants in the placebo group). Related unsolicited adverse events (none severe) were reported by two (5%, 1-17) of 39 participants in the VLA15 group and none (0%, 0-17) of 19 participants in the placebo group. There were no severe solicited local or systemic adverse events or deaths during the study. A booster dose of VLA15 is safe and induces substantial anamnestic immune responses against all six OspA serotypes. As with previously investigated OspA-based Lyme borreliosis vaccines, waning immune responses were observed with VLA15, and annual boosters might therefore be required. Valneva.

Efficacy and safety of Tianqi Pingchan Granule, a compound Chinese herbal medicine, for levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

BackgroundPatients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) undergoing long-term levodopa therapy are prone to develop levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID). Amantadine is the main drug recommended for the treatment of LID by current guidelines, but it is far from meeting clinical needs. Tianqi Pingchan Granule (TPG), a compound Chinese herbal medicine, has been developed to relieve symptom of LID. ObjectiveThis randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination of TPG and amantadine for LID. Design, setting, participants and interventionsThis is a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, conducted from January 2020 to August 2021 at 6 sites in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai, China. One hundred PD patients with ≥ 0.5 h of LID were randomly assigned to either the TPG plus amantadine group (TPG group) or the placebo plus amantadine group (placebo group), and treated for a period of 12 weeks. To ensure unbiased results, all study participants, investigators and sponsors were unaware of group allocations. Additionally, the data analysts remained blinded until the analysis was finalized. Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was assessed using the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) (Range 0–104). The key secondary end point was improvement of motor and non-motor symptoms. Safety analyses included all enrolled patients. ResultsOne hundred patients were enrolled and randomized into the two treatment groups. The changes in UDysRS at week 12 were –11.02 for the TPG group and –4.19 for the placebo group (treatment difference –6.83 [–10.53 to –3.12]; P = 0.0004). Adverse events were reported for 2 of 50 patients (4.0%) in each of the groups. ConclusionThis study indicated that a 12-week treatment of amantadine plus TPG effectively reduced UDysRS scores and was well tolerated, demonstrating the efficacy and safety of TPG for the treatment of LID in PD.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04173832. Please cite this article asZhang Y, Zhu XB, Zhao Y, Cui GY, Li WT, Yuan CX, Huang JP, Wan Y, Wu N, Song L, Zhao JH, Liang Y, Xu CY, Liu MJ, Gao C, Chen XX, Liu ZG. Efficacy and safety of Tianqi Pingchan Granule, a compound Chinese herbal medicine, for levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J Integr Med. 2024; 22(5): 545–551.

Impact of age on clinical trial availability for AYAs with cancer: A time-trend analysis.

1534 Background: Low participation of adolescents and young adults (AYAs, age 15-39 yrs at diagnosis) in cancer clinical trials (CCT) limits their access to novel therapies and hinders the ability to study disease biology and age-specific toxicities. Patient age may be an important barrier as younger and older AYAs may be excluded depending on the trial’s focus. In 2017, the American Society of Clinical Oncology and Friends of Cancer Research issued a joint statement encouraging removal of age as a CCT eligibility criterion unless there is specific biological rationale. To evaluate the impact of this statement, we undertook this analysis of CCT availability for AYAs. Our primary objective was to compare the number of CCT available for AYAs, overall and by tumor types, from 2019-2023 vs previously published data from 2007-2018. The availability of early phase trials and study sponsor was also assessed. Methods: We identified CCT registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2019 to July 2023 enrolling patients with 10 malignancies relevant for AYAs (Hodgkin lymphoma, anaplastic large cell lymphoma, melanoma, extracranial germ cell tumors [GCT], medulloblastoma, thyroid cancer, Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma [RMS], and synovial sarcoma). Trials were categorized as adult (≥18 yrs), transitional (patients &lt; or ≥18 yrs), or pediatric (&lt;18 yrs). Transitional trials with an age range 12-18 to &lt;40 yrs were defined as AYA specific trials. Early phase included phase 1 and 1/2 trials; late phase included phase 2/3 and 3 trials. Trial availability from 2007-2018 was identified from a prior analysis by deRojas et al in 2019 (PMID:32337483). The proportion of trials in each category was compared between 2007-2018 and 2019-2023 using z-tests. Results: There were 1071 eligible trials registered on Clinicaltrials.gov: 840 (78%) adult, 226 (21%) transitional, and 5 (0.5%) pediatric. Four trials were AYA-specific. Compared to the prior 10 years, the proportion of transitional trials did not change overall (19% vs 21%, p=0.24) or within any disease. Whereas the proportion of trials available at age 17 has not significantly changed overall (20% vs 21%; p=0.48) or within any disease, the proportion of trials available at age 18 significantly increased (95% vs 98%; p&lt;0.001) in aggregate and specifically for Ewing sarcoma (93% vs 100%; p=0.003), GCT (96% vs 99%; p=0.002), medulloblastoma (86% vs 98%; p=0.006), RMS (87% vs 98%; p=0.007) and thyroid cancer (92% vs 98%; p=0.01). Time trends for transitional trials by phase and sponsor are summarized (Table). Conclusions: Availability of transitional trials for AYAs has not increased, particularly for those &lt;18 yrs. The 18-yr-old age limit continues to be an obstacle in CCT availability and enrollment. [Table: see text]

Overcoming racial and ethnic disparities in clinical trial enrollment real world evidence from an NCI-Designated Cancer Center in a minority majority county.

e13708 Background: Significant racial and ethnic disparities continue to persist in clinical trial enrollment. Specifically, Asian and Hispanic individuals are severely underrepresented compared to their census estimates and make up as little as 1% and 6% respectively of all clinical trial enrollments [PMID: 35875251]. This limits the generalizability of clinical trials and consequently the application of novel therapeutics for diverse populations. This observational study looks at enrollment demographics at the University of California, Irvine (UCI) with an emphasis on minority participation in clinical trials. We hypothesized that minorities would be underrepresented in our enrollment population. Methods: The UCI Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (CFCCC) is located in Orange County (OC), CA, a minority-majority county. Enrollment data from clinical trials was collected from 2015-2023 through the CFCCC clinical research database. Demographics were compared to data provided by the NIH SEER reports in both OC and United States. Results: Between 2015-2023, 2315 individuals across 3 UCI Health facilities were enrolled. Demographics were as follows: White, Asian, Black, American Indian/Alaska Native, mixed/unknown race (66.4%/20.1%/2.4%/0.7%/0.7%/ 9.3%). Non-Hispanic vs Hispanic ethnicity (77.8%/20.6%). Female vs Male sex (47.6%/52.3%). Age &lt;70 vs &gt;70 years (78.6%/21.4%). Low Income/Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSA) vs non-Low Income/HPSA (44.9%/55.0%). Study Phase: Phase I/II (39.2%), Phase II (28.0%), Phase III (29.3%), Phase II/III (3.0%), and Phase IV (0.3%). Study sponsor: Industry (61.2%), Investigator initiated (23.5), Cooperative group (14.9%), other (0.3%). Most notably, the Asian enrollment (20.1%) and Hispanic enrollment (20.6%) exceeded demographic representation of Asians (15.6%) and Hispanics (17.3%) in OC. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that accrual of minorities is feasible across all types of clinical trials. These findings suggest that minorities are not inherently less likely to enroll in clinical trials. A clinical trial portfolio mirroring the catchment area might improve accrual of minorities. Enrollment based on race/ethnicity and trial phase/sponsor will be presented at the meeting.

Artificial Intelligence for Real-Time Prediction of the Histology of Colorectal Polyps by General Endoscopists.

Real-time prediction of histologic features of small colorectal polyps may prevent resection and/or pathologic evaluation and therefore decrease colonoscopy costs. Previous studies showed that computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) was highly accurate, though it did not outperform expert endoscopists. To assess the diagnostic performance of histologic predictions by general endoscopists before and after assistance from CADx in a real-life setting. Prospective, multicenter, single-group study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04437615). 6 centers across the United States. 1252 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy and 49 general endoscopists with variable experience in real-time prediction of polyp histologic features. Real-time use of CADx during routine colonoscopy. The primary end points were the sensitivity and specificity of CADx-unassisted and CADx-assisted histologic predictions for adenomas measuring 5 mm or less. For clinical purposes, additional estimates according to location and confidence level were provided. The CADx device made a diagnosis for 2695 polyps measuring 5 mm or less (96%) in 1252 patients. There was no difference in sensitivity between the unassisted and assisted groups (90.7% vs. 90.8%; P = 0.52). Specificity was higher in the CADx-assisted group (59.5% vs. 64.7%; P < 0.001). Among all 2695 polyps measuring 5 mm or less, 88.2% and 86.1% (P < 0.001) in the CADx-assisted and unassisted groups, respectively, could be resected and discarded without pathologic evaluation. Among 743 rectosigmoid polyps measuring 5 mm or less, 49.5% and 47.9% (P < 0.001) in the CADx-assisted and unassisted groups, respectively, could be left in situ without resection. Decision making based on CADx might differ outside a clinical trial. CADx assistance did not result in increased sensitivity of optical diagnosis. Despite a slight increase, the specificity of CADx-assisted diagnosis remained suboptimal. Olympus America Corporation served as the clinical study sponsor.

Abstract PO4-17-02: A multicenter, prospective, observational study of patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan for the treatment of HER2-positive and HER2-low unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer: DESTINY-Breast-RESPOND

Abstract Background: Approximately 20% of breast cancer (BC) cases are human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+; immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+, IHC 2+/in-situ hybridization [ISH]+), and up to ~50% of patients with primary or metastatic BC (mBC) have HER2-low tumors (IHC 1+, IHC 2+/ISH−), a new therapeutically targetable subset of BC. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugate approved in the USA, EU, and other countries for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2+ BC who have received a prior anti-HER2-based regimen, or with unresectable or metastatic HER2-low BC who have received a prior chemotherapy (CTx) in the metastatic setting or developed disease recurrence during or within 6 months of completing adjuvant CTx. Approvals followed positive results from the DESTINY-Breast03 and DESTINY-Breast04 clinical trials. In DESTINY-Breast03, T-DXd improved median progression-free survival (mPFS) compared with trastuzumab emtansine (28.8 vs 6.8 months, respectively; P&amp;lt; 0.0001) in previously treated (prior trastuzumab and taxane) patients with HER2+ mBC. In DESTINY-Breast04, T-DXd significantly improved mPFS vs physician’s choice of CTx (9.9 vs 5.1 months, respectively; P&amp;lt; 0.001) in all randomized patients with HER2-low mBC who were previously treated with one or two lines of CTx. Alongside these efficacy benefits, T-DXd has demonstrated an acceptable and generally manageable safety profile. To optimize care and maximize treatment benefit, insights into real-world T-DXd use and safety events of interest, including patient management and experience, are needed. This study aims to describe the effectiveness and tolerability of T-DXd in patients with HER2+ or HER2-low unresectable and/or mBC in a real-world setting. Trial design: DESTINY-Breast-RESPOND (NCT05592483) is a multicenter (120 sites planned as of June 2023), multi-country (HER2+ cohort: several regions globally; HER2-low cohort: North America only), prospective, observational study characterizing real-world clinical use, effectiveness, tolerability, and patient experience among adults who initiated T-DXd monotherapy, per standard of care, for HER2+ (second line or earlier) and HER2-low unresectable and/or mBC (T-DXd not provided by study sponsor). The decision to initiate T-DXd will be made by the physician prior to, and independent from, participation in this study. Approximately 750 patients with HER2+ and 250 patients with HER2-low disease will be enrolled. Patients must have received prior treatment with a trastuzumab-containing regimen in the metastatic setting or have evidence of disease progression within 6 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment (HER2+ cohort), or prior CTx in the metastatic setting or have evidence of disease progression within 6 months of adjuvant CTx (HER2-low cohort). Data will be collected via chart abstraction, patient-reported outcome questionnaires on tolerability and safety (PGI-TT, NCI PRO-CTCAE, and EORTC IL19), and a daily patient nausea/vomiting symptom diary. Endpoints will be analyzed separately for HER2+ and HER2-low cohorts. The primary endpoint of interest is time to next treatment from T-DXd initiation, a measure of real-world effectiveness. Other important endpoints include treatment patterns, safety events of interest (nausea/vomiting, fatigue, alopecia, interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis, left ventricular ejection fraction decrease) and their management, time to T-DXd discontinuation, and patient-reported tolerability. Patients will be observed until end of study (~60% of patients receive subsequent treatment or have died), withdrawal from study, or loss to follow up, whichever occurs first. Citation Format: Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Reva Basho, Maryam Lustberg, Gary H Lyman, Manoj Prahladan, Gareth D. James, Della Varghese, Flavia Lujan, Hans Tesch. A multicenter, prospective, observational study of patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan for the treatment of HER2-positive and HER2-low unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer: DESTINY-Breast-RESPOND [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-17-02.

Abstract PO1-14-01: Clonal Architecture of circulating tumor DNA predicts Early Progression on Tamoxifen With or Without Palbociclib in Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: NCCH1607/PATHWAY trial

Abstract Objective: Some patients with poor prognosis hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) experience early disease progression on the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy. We aimed to determine whether clonal architecture assessed by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could identify patients at higher risk of early progression on tamoxifen therapy with or without palbociclib. Methods: PATHWAY trial is a randomized, placebo-controlled, Asian international, double-blind, phase 3 study evaluating palbociclib plus tamoxifen (PAL+TAM) versus placebo plus tamoxifen (PLB+TAM) in pre/perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- ABC (NCT03423199). The study was conducted as a Clinical Research Collaboration with the National Cancer Center Hospital as the regulatory study sponsor and Pfizer providing drug and financial support. The primary endpoint was investigator assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Genomic profiling by next-generation sequencing was an exploratory endpoint to characterize molecular alterations in ctDNA and correlate these with clinical outcomes. Plasma samples were collected at cycle 1-day 1 (pre-treatment) and cycle 2-day 15 and sequenced with the Guardant360 assay (Guardant Health). Patients were included if they had a minimum of 14 days of treatment in the first cycle. The variant allele frequency (VAF) was defined as number of mutant molecules at a specific nucleotide location over the total number of molecules present in the background at a specific given genomic location. We assessed the gene with highest VAF as the dominant clone allele frequency (DCAF). The association of changes in ctDNA alterations with PFS was evaluated to identify biomarkers of early progression. Results: Pre-treatment plasma was successfully sequenced in 177 of the 184 patients; 88 patients treated with PAL+TAM, and 89 with PLB+TAM. ctDNA was detected in 144 (81.4%) patients; the median number of genetic abnormalities was 2 (range, 0-19). PIK3CA, TP53, ERBB2, ESR1, AKT1, EGFR and PTEN were the genes with highest VAF as the dominant clone (24.3%, 11.9%, 4.5%, 4.5%, 3.4%, 3.4%, 3.4%, respectively). The median DCAF was 1.79 (range, 0.1-81.23); PAL+TAM, 2.53 (range, 0.1-63.5) and PLB+TAM, 1.65 (range, 0.08-81.23). Patients with ≥ 2 detectable genomic alterations and DCAF ≥ 1.8% had worse PFS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.93 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.375 to 2.721], p = 0.0003 and HR 1.95 [95% CI: 1.345 to 2.834], p &amp;lt; 0.0001, respectively) compared to all other patients. In addition, we evaluated whether changes of clonal architecture in ctDNA at early treatment time point (ie. Cycle 2 Day 15) are associated with PFS. Patients with increased DCAF had worse PFS on both PAL+TAM (HR 2.80 [95% CI: 0.552 to 14.15], p = 0.04) and PLB+TAM (HR 2.02 [95% CI: 1.022 to 3.990], p = 0.01). All patients with high pretreatment DCAF (≥ 1.8%) and increase in DCAF progressed within 1 year (n=5, 2 patients treated with PAL+TAM, and 3 with PLB+TAM). Conclusion: Evaluation of clonal architecture in ctDNA could support identification of HR+/HER2- ABC patients with poorer prognosis, who may be at higher risk of early progression, regardless of CDK4/6 inhibitor use. Citation Format: Yoon-Sim Yap, Yuki Kojima, Akinobu Hamada, Hirofumi Mukai, Yen-Shen Lu, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Yoshiko Umeyama, Emi Noguchi, Kazuki Sudo, Tomomi Hata, Aya Kuchiba, Taro Shibata, Shigehiro Yagishita, Masayuki Yoshida, Shinji Kohsaka, Kouya Shiraishi, Kenichi Nakamura, Kenji Tamura, Kan Yonemori. Clonal Architecture of circulating tumor DNA predicts Early Progression on Tamoxifen With or Without Palbociclib in Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: NCCH1607/PATHWAY trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-14-01.

Phase Ib/II Study of Lacnotuzumab in Combination with Spartalizumab in Patients with Advanced Malignancies.

Blocking the colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) signal on tumor-associated macrophages can lead to an upregulation of checkpoint molecules, such as programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), thus causing resistance to this blockade. Combining spartalizumab (PDR001), a high-affinity, ligand-blocking, humanized anti-PD-1 immunoglobulin G4 antibody, with lacnotuzumab (MCS110), a high-affinity, humanized monoclonal antibody directed against human CSF-1 can potentially overcome this resistance. This was a multicenter, phase Ib/II trial using a combination of spartalizumab with lacnotuzumab in patients with advanced cancers, including anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment-resistant melanoma, and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment-naïve triple-negative breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, and endometrial cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02807844). The primary objective of dose escalation phase Ib was to assess safety, tolerability, and recommended phase II dose. The primary objective of the phase II expansion study was to assess the combination's antitumor activity, including objective response rate and clinical benefit rate. A total of eight patients (five in phase Ib and three in phase II) were evaluable for adverse events (AEs) at our study site. All eight patients experienced at least grade 1 AE. The most common treatment-related AEs were increased serum aspartate aminotransferase (38%), fatigue (38%), anemia (25%), increased alkaline phosphatase (25%), hyperbilirubinemia (25%), hypocalcemia (25%), and hypoalbuminemia (25%). Most of these AEs were grade 1 or 2. None of the patients experienced grade 4 AEs and no drug-related fatal AEs were reported among the eight patients treated in the study. One (13%) patient had stable disease (SD) (captured as unknown by the study sponsor because the evaluation criteria set per protocol was not met) and three (38%) patients had progressive disease. Four (50%) patients developed clinical disease progression based on investigator evaluation. One patient with pancreatic cancer achieved immune-related SD for 26 months while on the study treatments. The study completed phase Ib dose escalation and phase II. However, gating criteria for efficacy were not met for expansion beyond 80 patients in phase II and the sponsor did not continue development of the combination of spartalizumab and lacnotuzumab for oncology indications. The potential signal of activity in pancreatic cancer should be further explored.

Loss of Intestinal SNX27 Promotes Barrier Dysfunction and Inflammatory Responses

SNX27 belongs to the sorting nexin (SNX) family of proteins that play a crucial role in the endocytic pathway. SNX27 carries a unique PDZ domain, mediates recycling of endocytosed transmembrane proteins, and is critical for neurodevelopmental processes. However, its role in the intestine has not been explored yet. Here we aim to determine the previously unknown roles of SNX27 in regulating intestinal tissue homeostasis, epithelial barrier integrity, and related disorders. We have generated a novel mouse model of SNX27 deletion form intestinal epithelial cells (SNX27ΔIEC). We challenged the mice with DSS-induced colitis and AOM/DSS-induced colorectal cancer (CRC). We performed in vitro SNX27 loss of function studies via siRNA knockdown (KD) in SKCO15 cells. We further analyzed SNX27 expression in IBD and CRC patients via online human datasets. SNX27ΔIEC mice had shorter colon, small intestines, and heavier spleens. We found increased intestinal permeability upon SNX27 deletion. SNX27ΔIEC mice had significantly upregulated cleaved Caspase-3 (pro-apoptotic) and downregulated Bcl-xL (anti-apoptotic) protein levels. TUNEL staining also showed greater apoptotic cells in SNX27ΔIEC mice. Tight-junction proteins Claudin10 and ZO-1, as well as adherens-junction proteins ꞵ-catenin and E-cadherin, were downregulated in SNX27ΔIEC mice. The histological inflammation score and mRNA levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α were higher in SNX27ΔIEC mice. Protein expression level of phospho-p65 was increased in SNX27ΔIEC mice, indicating NFkB pathway activation. Upon challenging with intestinal disorders, SNX27ΔIEC mice were more sensitive towards DSS and AOM/DSS treatments as they lost more bodyweight, had higher intestinal permeability levels, and heavier spleens. SNX27 KD in vitro reduced protein levels of PCNA and delayed wound closure in a wound healing assay. SNX27-KD cells had higher nuclear translocation of phospho-p65. Additionally, we observed cytoplasmic localization rearrangement and downregulation of ꞵ-catenin and E-cadherin, key mediators of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Lastly, human datasets GSE11223, 6731, 8671, 21510 revealed significant downregulation of SNX27 expression in IBD and CRC patients, suggesting towards clinical relevance of SNX27 in intestinal disorders. Overall, intestinal deletion of SNX27 promotes apoptosis, inflammation, and disrupts epithelial barrier that increases susceptibility towards colonic inflammation and tumorigenesis. Our results indicate a novel role of SNX27 in regulating intestinal tissue homeostasis. Understanding the mechanisms of lower SNX27 in IBD and CRC will provide insights into new prevention and targets against these chronic diseases. We would like to acknowledge the VA Merit Award 1 I01BX004824-01, DOD CDMRP BC191198, the NIDDK/National Institutes of Health grants R01 DK105118 and R01DK114126 to Jun Sun. The study sponsors performed no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation of data. The contents do not represent the views of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Diversity in enrollment to clinical trials for cataract medicine and surgery: meta-analysis.

To investigate sex, racial, and ethnic disparities in patient enrollment across cataract trials registered in the United States. Participants enrolled in high-quality (reduced risk of bias), U.S.-registered (on ClinicalTrials.gov ), cataract-related randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RCTs must be completed, have used double or greater masking, and have published results through the registry or a scholarly journal. Cross-sectional database study. Trial (study sponsor country, study site location, trial initiation year, study phase, and study masking) and demographic data (sex, race, and ethnicity according to U.S. reporting guidelines) were collected. The Global Burden of Disease database provided sex-based cataract disease burdens. Pooled participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs) with 95% CIs were calculated for female sex, with values between 0.8 and 1.2 constituting sufficient study enrollment. Kruskal-Wallis tests (α = 0.05) with subsequent post hoc comparisons were used to evaluate demographic representations stratified by trial characteristics. From 864 records, 100 clinical trials (N = 67 874) were identified, of which 97 (N = 67 697) reported sex demographics with a pooled female PPR of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.94). Of the 67 697 total participants, the absolute female enrollment was 19 062 (28.16%). Ethnicity and race were reported in 9 (N = 1792) and 26 trials (N = 23 181), respectively. Among trials that reported race, most were White (N = 19 574; 84.44%). High-quality, U.S.-registered, cataract trials enrolled acceptable proportions of women. However, the absolute number of female and racialized participants was low. Race and ethnicity were underreported. Disparity trends predominately held across secondary variables. To promote generalizability, future trials should pursue equitable demographic enrollment.

Lessons learned from a multi-data source research collaboration: The mirabegron post-authorization safety study program.

Many factors contribute to developing and conducting a successful multi-data source, non-interventional, post-authorization safety study (NI-PASS) for submission to multiple health authorities. Such studies are often large undertakings; evaluating and sharing lessons learned can provide useful insights to others considering similar studies. We discuss challenges and key methodological and organizational factors that led to the delivery of a successful post-marketing requirement (PMR)/PASS program investigating the risk of cardiovascular and cancer events among users of mirabegron, an oral medication for the treatment of overactive bladder. We provide context and share learnings, including sections on research program collaboration, scientific transparency, organizational approach, mitigation of uncertainty around potential delays, validity of study outcomes, selection of data sources and optimizing patient numbers, choice of comparator groups and enhancing precision of estimates of associations, potential confounding and generalizability of study findings, and interpretation of results. This large PMR/PASS program was a long-term commitment from all parties and benefited from an effective coordinating center and extensive scientific interactions across research partners, scientific advisory board, study sponsor, and health authorities, and delivered useful learnings related to the design and organization of multi-data source NI-PASS.

Abstract CT132: A Phase I/IIa clinical trial (TranStar101) to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of OSEMITAMAB administered as monotherapy or in combination with nivolumab or standard of care in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors

Abstract Introduction: TST001/osemitamab is a novel, recombinant humanized IgG1 mAb with improved CLDN18.2 binding affinity and enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and can result in more efficient cytotoxicity of tumors expressing human CLDN18.2 across a broad range of levels including low to medium expression. Methods: This is an open-label, multi-center phase I/IIa first in human (FIH) study of osemitamab administered as monotherapy or in combination with nivolumab or standard of care for patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. The study includes two parts: Part A (completed), a dose escalation of osemitamab as a monotherapy in solid tumors, osemitamab intravenous infusion at dose from 1mg/kg to 10mg/kg and once every two weeks (Q2W) or once every three weeks (Q3W) were evaluated; Part B (ongoing) includes expansion cohorts of osemitamab in combination with other therapies (cohort A and B). Cohort A includes combination of osemitamab, nivolumab, and mFOLFOX6 as the 1st line treatment for G/GEJ cancer. Cohort B includes osemitamab in combination with nivolumab in advanced pre-treated G/GEJ cancer. Results: As of Nov. 30, 2023, 68 patients have been treated: 38 patients were enrolled in the Part A dose escalation,13 in Part B Cohort A, and 17 in Part B Cohort B. The population (N=68) consisted of 59% males, median age 62 years and 50% with G/GEJ cancer. Doses evaluated are 3 to 10mg/kg Q3W and 1 to 6 mg/kg Q2W in part A. One dose limiting toxicity of Grade 3 infusion related reaction was reported at the 1mg/kg dose Q2W. The MTD was not reached. The recommended phase 2 dose was determined as 6mg/kg Q3W or 4mg/kg Q2W based on the totality of available safety, efficacy, PK/PD data including information from another phase I/II study (TranStar102). The most common TRAEs (occurred in ≥ 20% subjects) were nausea (73.5%), vomiting (48.5%), fatigue (30.9%). TRAE of Grade ≥ 3 across all tested doses (3-10 mg/kg) that occurred in ≥3% of patients included nausea, vomiting, hypoalbuminemia, hypertension, infusion related reaction, and lymphocyte count increased. Within the dose ranges studied, PK exposures increased as dose increased. The mean CLss value of osemitamab ranged from 9.4 to 13.7 mL/day/kg across different dose levels, without a clear dose relationship. Mild accumulation was observed following Q2W and Q3W dosing. Conclusion: Osemitamab as monotherapy or in combination with nivolumab or mFOLFOX plus nivolumab is well tolerated and safe with a PK profile consistent with other studies (TranStar 102 study -NCT04495296). TranStar 101 is currently ongoing. More information will be shared. Clinical trial information: NCT04396821. Study Sponsor: Suzhou Transcenta Therapeutics Co., Ltd. Citation Format: Yelena Janjigian, Anthony Tolcher, Rutika Mehta, Michael Cecchini, Brian Van Tine, Madappa Kundranda, Alese Olatunji, Manish R. Patel, Jordan Berlin, Caio Max Sao Pedro Rocha-Lima, Dulabh Monga, Ben George, Aaron Scott, Zhenzhong Xia, Mohamed Elsafy, Erikca Jones, Zhenling Yao, Chuan Qi, Caroline Germa, Nash Gabrail. A Phase I/IIa clinical trial (TranStar101) to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of OSEMITAMAB administered as monotherapy or in combination with nivolumab or standard of care in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT132.

Abstract CT260: A phase II trial of defactinib combined with avutometinib in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma

Abstract Background: Outcomes remain poor for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM). Therapies targeting commonly mutated G-protein pathway-associated GNAQ and GNA11 have not been met with clinical success. Recent kinome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screens revealed that FAK and RAF/MEK co-targeting may provide a new network-based precision therapeutic strategy for MUM treatment. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-arm, single-institution, phase II study evaluating the combination of a FAK inhibitor (defactinib, VS-6063) with a RAF/MEK inhibitor (avutometinib, VS-6766) for the treatment of MUM [NCT04720417]. Defactinib was given 200mg twice daily and avutometinib was given 3.2mg twice a week. Both drugs were given for 3 weeks on and 1 week off (28-day cycle). The primary endpoint of the study is disease control rate (DCR) including complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD) as determined by RECIST version 1.1 after two cycles. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The trial was designed using a Simon’s two stage design where in stage I, a total of 8 patients would be accrued and if there are ≤2 overall responses, further enrollment would be stopped with the conclusion that DCR cannot be ≥50%. An additional 10 patients would be accrued in stage II, resulting in a total sample size of 18 patients. Results: Twelve patients with MUM were treated with the combination. Median lines of prior therapy was 2 (range 0-7), with 3 patients (25%) being treatment naïve. After 2 cycles, 6 patients achieved SD (50%) while the other 6 patients developed PD. No patients achieved CR or PR. Median duration of treatment was 2.6 months for all patients, and 5.6 months for patients with SD. With a median follow up of 16.5 months, the median PFS was 2.6 months and median OS was 18.4 months. All adverse events (AE) were Grade 1-2 except one Grade 3 AE of asymptomatic elevated CPK that resolved with holding treatment and did not recur upon restarting. Most common AEs were rash (100%), diarrhea (66.7%), peripheral edema (50%), nausea (50%), fatigue (50%), and blurred vision (41.7%). No dose reductions were required for any patients. Reduction of active ERK (pERK) was observed in 2 patients that achieved SD, but not in 2 patients that had PD. Trial enrollment was stopped early by study sponsors before the anticipated accrual of 18 patients due to no patients having significant reduction in disease. Conclusions: In this phase II study of the combination regimen of FAK and RAF/MEK inhibitors, stable disease was achieved in half of patients with MUM. Treatment was well tolerated with only one transient asymptomatic grade 3 CPK elevation. Further research should seek to elucidate an optimal combination treatment strategy such as FAK and PKC inhibitors for improved blocking of the downstream pathways of GNAQ/GNA11 driver mutations. Citation Format: Rino S. Seedor, Mizue Terai, Amry Majeed, Ryota Tanaka, Andrew E. Aplin, Marlana Orloff, Alfredo A. Molinolo, J Silvio Gutkind, Takami Sato. A phase II trial of defactinib combined with avutometinib in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT260.