Study Drug-related Adverse Events Research Articles

#812 Phase 2b ORIGIN study open label extension with atacicept in patients with IgA nephropathy and persistent proteinuria: week 72 interim analysis

Abstract Background and Aims IgA nephropathy (IgAN), the most common primary glomerulonephritis and a significant contributor to ESKD worldwide, is characterized by elevated serum levels of galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1). The production of Gd-IgA1 and its autoantibodies is driven by both the B-cell Activating Factor (BAFF) and A PRoliferation-Inducing Ligand (APRIL) signaling pathways that stimulate maturation, differentiation, and effector function of B cells and plasma cells. Atacicept is a fusion protein targeting both BAFF and APRIL in clinical development for IgAN treatment. The Phase 2b ORIGIN study met the primary endpoint with statistically significant urine protein:creatinine ratio (UPCR) reduction at 24 weeks vs placebo. At 36 weeks, atacicept 150 mg achieved statistically significant and clinically meaningful UPCR reduction, eGFR stabilization, and Gd-IgA1 reduction vs placebo, with similar safety to placebo. This interim analysis reports 72-week results from the open-label extension period. Method The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2b ORIGIN study included 116 participants with biopsy-proven IgAN, 24 h urine protein >0.75 g/day or UPCR >0.75 g/g, and eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 despite optimized renin–angiotensin system blockade. Participants were randomized to atacicept 150, 75, or 25 mg, vs placebo (2:2:1:2), self-administered by subcutaneous injection once weekly for up to 36 weeks. The double-blind randomized treatment period was followed by an open-label extension in which participants could receive atacicept 150 mg for up to 60 additional weeks, for a total of 96 weeks. For this interim analysis, changes from baseline in eGFR, natural log transformed UPCR, and Gd-IgA1 through 72 weeks were analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measurements. Microscopic hematuria was evaluated on urine dipstick and participants with hematuria grade 1+ or higher at baseline were evaluated for resolution, defined as a decrease to negative/trace, at 72 weeks. Results Of 116 randomized participants in the double-blind period, 106 participants (91%) completed 72 weeks of treatment. At 72 weeks, eGFR total slope estimate was 0.0 mL/min/1.73m2/year and eGFR change from baseline was 0 mL/min/1.73m2 in all participants originally randomized to atacicept (all-atacicept group; n = 82). After switching to open-label atacicept 150 mg, the original placebo group showed eGFR stabilization with −3.2 mL/min/1.73m2 change from baseline at 72 weeks vs −4.9 mL/min/1.73m2 at 36 weeks (Figure 1). At 72 weeks, UPCR change from baseline was −45% in the all-atacicept group and the placebo switch group showed a −47% UPCR change from baseline at 72 weeks vs +3% at 36 weeks (Figure 2). Open-label atacicept 150 mg was also associated with rapid Gd-IgA1 reduction in the placebo switch group at 48 weeks that was sustained through 72 weeks. Hematuria resolution was observed at 72 weeks in 81% (35/43) of participants in the all-atacicept group and 59% (10/17) in the placebo switch group. Atacicept was generally well tolerated during the open-label extension, with a similar rate of infections compared to the double-blind period and one study drug-related serious adverse event. Conclusion At 72 weeks, treatment with atacicept 150 mg was associated with sustained eGFR stability and deepening UPCR reductions, as well as a reversal of the downward eGFR decline in the placebo switch group. Sustained reductions in hematuria were also observed. The open-label extension showed a favorable safety profile similar to the double-blind period. These results support atacicept 150 mg as a potential disease-modifying treatment for IgAN.

Supramolecular salicylic acid combined with niacinamide in chloasma: A randomized controlled trial.

No trial of supramolecular salicylic acid (SSA) for chloasma is available yet. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of Bole DA 30% supramolecular salicylic acid (SSA) combined with 10% niacinamide in treating chloasma. This multicenter (n=15), randomized, double-blind, parallel placebo-controlled trial randomized the subjects (1:1) to Bole DA 30% SSA or placebo. The primary endpoint was the effective rate after 16 weeks using the modified melasma area severity index (mMASI) [(pretreatment-posttreatment)/pretreatment×100%]. This study randomized 300 subjects (150/group in the full analysis set, 144 and 147 in the per-protocol set). The total mMASI score, overall Griffiths 10 score, left Griffiths 10 score, and right Griffiths 10 score were significantly lower in the Bole DA 30% SSA group than in the placebo group (all P<0.001). One study drug-related AE and one study drug-unrelated adverse events (AE) were reported in the Bole DA 30% SSA group. No AE was reported in the placebo group. Bole DA 30% SSA combined with 10% niacinamide is effective and safe for treating chloasma. ChiCTR2200065346.

Emapalumab, a Fully Human Anti-Interferon Gamma Monoclonal Antibody, in Pediatric Patients with Primary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis: Long-Term Follow-up of a Phase 2/3 Study

Background: Primary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (pHLH) is a rare, life-threatening genetically heterogeneous, autosomal recessive disorder, characterized by immune dysregulation and hyperinflammation. Acute treatment of pHLH has traditionally involved immunochemotherapy with glucocorticoids and etoposide to suppress hyperinflammation and facilitate the patient undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the only potentially curative therapy. Emapalumab, a fully human immunoglobulin G1 anti-interferon-γ (IFNγ) monoclonal antibody, binds free and receptor-bound IFNγ, neutralizing its biologic activity. Emapalumab has demonstrated efficacy in patients with pHLH and has a favorable safety profile with no increase in the risk of adverse events (AEs), including infections, with increasing drug exposure prior to patients undergoing HSCT. Objective: To monitor the long-term safety and efficacy of emapalumab in patients with pHLH, including the period after undergoing HSCT. Methods: Long-term follow-up study (NCT02069899) of patients with pHLH who had received ≥1 dose of emapalumab in a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase 2/3 clinical trial who were followed for 1 year after HSCT or last administration of emapalumab in the parent study (NCT01818492). Patients received emapalumab for 4 to 8 weeks in the parent study, which included a 4-week short-term follow-up period, during which patients could have undergone HSCT. Treatment with emapalumab could continue according to the parent study protocol during follow-up, if a favorable benefit/risk assessment was established. Any concomitant treatment ongoing at the time of study entry was continued as considered necessary by the investigators. Endpoints included safety, 1-year survival, and HSCT outcomes. Results: Overall, 37/45 patients who participated in the phase 2/3 study entered long-term follow-up, with 24 patients (64.9%) completing the study; 13 patients (35.1%) withdrew from the study, most commonly because of AEs (6 patients [46.2%]) and withdrawal of informed consent (2 patients [15.4%]). All patients had ≥1 concomitant medications including systemic corticosteroids and ≥1 systemic antimicrobial. Emapalumab treatment continued during long-term follow-up for 22 patients (59.5%). All patients experienced at least one AE during follow-up ( Table), most commonly infections or infestations (27 patients [73.0%] reported an infection AE). Most AEs were mild or moderate in intensity. Four patients (10.8%) had study drug-related AEs. Overall, 56.8% of patients experienced at least one severe AE. 28 patients (75.7%) experienced at least 1 serious AE (SAE), but only 1 patient (2.7%) had a treatment-related SAE (Coombs positive hemolytic anemia). Infusion-related reactions of rash were observed in 2 patients (5.4%), but these reactions were temporary and resolved without treatment. No patients experienced AEs leading to study drug discontinuation. Nine patients died during the study (4 prior to HSCT conditioning and 5 during the post-conditioning period). No study drug-related deaths were reported. 28 (75.7%) patients were alive at last observation or 1 year after last emapalumab dose and 33 (89.2%) survived to undergo HSCT or until 1 year after last emapalumab dose (whichever came first). 29 patients (78.4%) underwent HSCT, including 18 during long-term follow-up. 24 of the 29 (82.8%) patients who underwent HSCT were alive at last observation or 1 year after last emapalumab dose. Sustained engraftment was achieved in 23 patients (79.3%; 95% confidence interval, 61.6-90.2%). During the follow-up period, 6 patients (20.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.8-38.4%) experienced primary or secondary graft failure after undergoing HSCT and 7 patients (24.1%; 95% CI, 1.2-42.1%) had acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease. At the 12-months post-transplant visit, 25/26 (96.2%) patients maintained a complete response, while 1 (3.8%) patient was reported to have maintained a partial response. No pHLH reactivation was reported during the study. Conclusions: The long-term outcomes for patients with pHLH treated with emapalumab are consistent with observations made during a phase 2/3 study. A favorable safety profile was maintained, and a high proportion of patients received HSCT and achieved long-term survival.

A Phase 1b Study of ELA026, a Monoclonal Antibody Targeting Signal Regulatory Protein-α/β1/γ, in Patients with Newly Diagnosed and Previously Treated Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis

Introduction: ELA026 is under investigation in secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH), a life-threatening, hyperinflammatory condition that is most often triggered by malignancies, autoimmune disorders, and infectious diseases. There are no approved therapies for sHLH, and current treatment approaches, particularly for malignancy-associated HLH (mHLH), are suboptimal. For example, in adult patients with mHLH, median overall survival (mOS) is approximately 2 months (Lee et al. 2023). ELA026 is a monoclonal antibody directed against signal regulatory protein-α/β1/γ and is intended to target the activated myeloid and T cells that drive sHLH. Methods: This is an open-label, single-arm, Phase 1b global multicenter study (NCT05416307) to evaluate the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ELA026 in newly diagnosed and previously treated sHLH patients, aged 12 years or older (6 years or older in select countries including the US). In Cohort 1, an intra-patient dose escalation of ELA026 occurs in the absence of a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and optimal biomarker response. Response is evaluated as described in Locatelli et al. 2020. Results: Six mHLH patients enrolled in Cohort 1 with median age of 50 years (range 21-67). Three patients were refractory to etoposide-based therapies and/or anti-cytokine therapies. No DLTs or study drug-related serious adverse events occurred. Five patients were deemed evaluable for efficacy based on &amp;gt;1 week of ELA026 exposure (efficacy assessment is pending). All 5 patients received concurrent chemotherapy for their malignancies. As of July 31, 2023, 3 patients are alive and 2 patients have died from complications of malignancy (mOS has not been reached but has exceeded 3 months). Three patients who had periods of ELA026 monotherapy displayed early, progressive monocyte and lymphocyte reductions with associated improvements in C-reactive protein and other sHLH-associated biomarkers. Updated study results and progress will be provided at the meeting. Conclusion: Preliminary data suggest ELA026 is well tolerated in sHLH patients and induces early biomarker changes that warrant further clinical investigation.

1363. Preliminary Safety Results from a Phase 1 First in Human Study of VYD222: an Extended Half-Life Monoclonal Antibody (mAb) in Development for COVID-19 Prevention

Abstract Background VYD222 is a fully human IgG1 mAb demonstrating broad and potent in vitro neutralizing activity across SARS-CoV-2 variants including XBB.1.5. VYD222 is a re-engineered version of adintrevimab, an Fc-modified mAb that has a robust safety data package and demonstrated clinically meaningful results in Phase 2/3 clinical trials for both treatment and prevention of COVID-19 (NCT04805671, NCT04859517). VYD222 is currently in development for COVID-19 prevention. Methods This is an ongoing Phase 1, first in human, blinded, randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled, single ascending dose study of VYD222 administered as slow intravenous (IV) push to healthy adults aged 18-65 years (NCT05791318). Participants were randomized 8:2 in each of 3 cohorts (n=8 VYD222, n=2 PBO): VYD222 1500 mg, 2500 mg, and 4500 mg. Safety and tolerability will be assessed as incidence of treatment emergent adverse events, including serious adverse events (SAEs). Serum pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters will be calculated for VYD222 using noncompartmental analysis methods. Serum virus neutralizing antibody (sVNA) titers of VYD222 ex vivo against relevant SARS-CoV-2 variants will be assessed using a validated assay. Safety, tolerability, PK, and sVNA titers will be assessed through 12 months post-dose. Here we report preliminary blinded safety results from cohorts 1 and 2. Results Overall, 12 participants received VYD222 or PBO. Through a minimum of 14 days post dose, among 10 participants in cohort 1 (VYD222 1500 mg n=8, PBO n=2), there were 9 AEs (adverse events) reported, all of which were mild in severity and considered unrelated to study drug. No participant experienced SAEs, infusion-related reactions, or hypersensitivity reactions. Through 2 days post dose, 2 sentinel participants in cohort 2 (VYD222 2500 mg n=1, PBO n=1) experienced zero AEs, study drug related AEs, SAEs, infusion-related reactions, or hypersensitivity reactions. Enrollment continues in cohort 2 as of the data cutoff (04/25/2023) for this abstract. Data remain blinded currently. Conclusion To date, a single dose of VYD222, up to 2500 mg IV push, was well tolerated across all healthy participants receiving either VYD222 or PBO in this ongoing phase 1 study. These findings support continued clinical development of VYD222. Disclosures Kathryn Mahoney, PharmD, Invivyd, Inc.: Employee|Invivyd, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Deepali Gupta, BSc, Invivyd, Inc.: Employee|Invivyd, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Yong Li, PhD, Invivyd, Inc.: Employee|Invivyd, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Natalia Betancourt, MS, Invivyd, Inc.: Employee|Invivyd, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Aanika Das, PharmD, Invivyd, Inc.: Employee|Invivyd, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Ed Campanaro, MS, Invivyd, Inc.: Employee|Invivyd, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Pete Schmidt, MD, Invivyd, Inc.: Employee|Invivyd, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Serum Neutralizing Titers, and Immunogenicity of Adintrevimab, a Monoclonal Antibody Targeting SARS-CoV-2: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1 Dose-escalation Study in Healthy Adults

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Serum Neutralizing Titers, and Immunogenicity of Adintrevimab, a Monoclonal Antibody Targeting SARS-CoV-2: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1 Dose-escalation Study in Healthy Adults

Patient characteristics and safety of radium-223 dichloride in Taiwan: Analysis of real-world clinical practice.

119 Background: Bone metastases commonly develop in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), leading to poor clinical outcomes. Radium-223 (Ra-223) is a bone-targeting radiopharmaceutical that has been shown to improve the overall survival of these patients. Here, we present data on the safety and effectiveness of Ra-223 in patients with mCRPC and symptomatic bone metastases under routine clinical practice in Taiwan. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, single-arm, non-interventional observational study enrolled patients with mCRPC and symptomatic bone metastases. A total of 224 patients were included from July 2020 to January 2022. The patients received Ra-223 (55 kBq/kg of body weight) once every 4 weeks for a maximum of 6 intravenous injections. An exploratory subgroup analysis was conducted in patients who received Ra-223 either as a first-line, second-line or third-line. This first interim analysis of the study assessed the clinical outcomes observed during 6 months of Ra-223 treatment and 1 month after the final or last tolerated injection. Results: The dataset up until September 2021 (n = 104) was available for analysis. Of the 104 patients, 69 (66.3%) received 5–6 injections of Ra-223 while 35 (33.7%) received 1–4 injections. Sixty percent of enrolled patients were chemotherapy-naive. Furthermore, 22 (21.2%), 43 (41.3%) and 39 (37.5%) patients received Ra-223 as a first-, second- or third-line therapy, respectively; 16 (72.7%), 27 (62.8%) and 26 (66.7%) patients in these subgroups received 5–6 injections of Ra-223, respectively. The incidence of any study drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), hematologic TEAEs and all fracture events were 10.6%, 9.6% and 1.9%, respectively. When compared with the other subgroups, patients on first-line Ra-223 therapy had lower incidences of any drug-related AEs and discontinuation of therapy owing to AEs. In addition, there was a trend observed that better PSA control occurred in patient population using Ra-223 as mCRPC first-line treatment. Conclusions: The study data showed that under routine clinical practice in Taiwan, the rate of Ra-223-associated AEs were low and no new safety concerns were identified with this therapy. First-line Ra-223 therapy was more likely associated with fewer TEAEs and higher rates of completion with the 6-injection course of therapy. A follow-up observation of up to 2 years after the initial injection is on-going. Clinical trial information: NCT04232761 .

Radiotherapy, atezolizumab, and bevacizumab in rectal cancers with the aim of organ preservation: The TARZAN study.

158 Background: Rectal cancer is traditionally treated with total mesorectal excision (TME), with/without neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy. This approach often leads to temporary or permanent colostomies and other long-term morbidity such as urinary and sexual dysfunction in over 60% of patients. Organ preservation is increasingly being pursued in patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) following neoadjuvant treatment, thereby aiming to avoid TME-surgery. Based on preclinical data suggesting immunomodulatory effects of RT, and the synergy of combined PD-L1/VEGF blockade in several tumor types, the TARZAN study (NCT04017455) combines these treatments aiming to increase chances of organ preservation in patients with mainly MMR proficient (pMMR) rectal cancer without the need for chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with clinical stage ≤T3ab N0-1 distal-mid rectal tumors without mesorectal fascia involvement underwent 5x5 Gy RT followed by 3 cycles of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Response was evaluated by MRI and endoscopy. The primary endpoint was clinical complete and near-complete response (CR) rate at 12 weeks after RT. Secondary endpoints included safety, organ preservation, pathologic (near) CR in case of surgery, and relapse free survival. According to a Simon’s 2-stage design, ≥3 responders were needed in stage I (18 patients) to continue accrual into stage II. Here we report data from stage I. Results: Eighteen patients (14 male, median age 63), all with pMMR tumors, were treated. Six tumors were cN1 on MRI, 10/18 tumors were ≥4cm and for 10/18 patients abdominoperineal resection (APR) appeared necessary due to distal tumor location. At the time of response evaluation, (near-)CR was achieved in 10/18 (56%) patients according to the primary endpoint. With a median follow-up of 20 months, 9/18 (50%) patients remain without TME surgery. Of these 9 patients, 5 underwent local excision to achieve organ preservation and in 5 patients no additional intervention was needed (cCR). The remaining 9 patients underwent TME surgery (4 APR), and pathologic assessment revealed near-CR in two patients, and a pCR in one patient. Three patients developed distant recurrences, one in the organ-sparing group. Neoadjuvant treatment was well-tolerated with grade 3 study drug-related adverse events (AEs) in 1 (5%) patient. Grade 3 surgery-related AEs occurred in 5/9 (55%) patients, including 4 anastomotic leaks and 1 abscess. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant RT followed by atezolizumab and bevacizumab resulted in a promising rate of clinical (near-)CRs in 56% of patients without the need for chemotherapy, reaching the primary endpoint. Accrual is ongoing in stage II, in which an additional 20 patients will be treated. Clinical trial information: NCT04017455 .

1251. 5-year outcomes of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) as initial treatment of HIV-1 in adults with high baseline HIV-1 RNA and/or low CD4 count in two Phase 3 randomized clinical trials

Abstract Background People with HIV (PWH) who are initiated on guidelines-recommended first-line INSTI-based antiretroviral therapy routinely achieve rapid virologic suppression; however, those with a high baseline (BL) HIV-1 RNA and/or low CD4 count may be more challenging to manage in the short- and long-term. To further characterize long-term outcomes over 5 years in select subgroups, we analyzed results from two studies examining B/F/TAF as initial treatment stratified by BL HIV-1 RNA and/or CD4 count. Methods Adults with HIV were randomized to receive blinded initial treatment with B/F/TAF versus dolutegravir [DTG]/abacavir/lamivudine (Study 1489) or DTG+F/TAF (1490) for 144 weeks (W) of blinded treatment followed by an optional switch to open-label B/F/TAF for 96W. We present virologic response (HIV-1 RNA &amp;lt; 50 c/mL, missing=excluded and missing=failure) and study drug-related adverse events (DRAE) from a pooled analysis of participants originally randomized to B/F/TAF who had BL HIV-1 RNA 100,00-400,000 copies(c)/mL, HIV-1 RNA &amp;gt;400,000 c/mL and/or CD4 count &amp;lt; 200 cells/µL through W240. Results 634 adults (median age 32 years, 89% men, 33% Black/African descent, 24% Hispanic/LatinX) originally randomized to B/F/TAF were included for analysis. At BL, 80 participants had a BL CD4 count &amp;lt; 200 cells/µL and 119 participants had HIV-1 RNA &amp;gt;100,000 c/mL, of whom, 20 had HIV-1 RNA &amp;gt;400,000 c/mL. At W240, virologic suppression was high for the low CD4 count and/or high HIV-1 RNA subgroups (Table). No participant in the final resistance analysis developed virologic resistance to any component of B/F/TAF. Across the subgroups, the most common DRAEs were nausea, headache and diarrhea and there were no serious DRAEs. There was only one discontinuation due to a DRAE in the low CD4 count subgroup, and none in the high HIV-1 RNA subgroup. Conclusion Initial treatment with B/F/TAF was safe and efficacious over 5 years of follow-up in people with a high BL HIV-1 RNA and/or low CD4 count. These outcomes provide additional evidence that B/F/TAF is an effective and durable regimen for a broad range of PWH, including those with advanced disease. Disclosures Moti Ramgopal, MD, FACP, FIDSA, Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences: Speakers Bureau|Janssen: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen: Speakers Bureau|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Speakers Bureau|ViiV: Advisor/Consultant|ViiV: Speakers Bureau Axel Baumgarten, MD, AbbVie: Honoraria|Gilead Sciences: Honoraria|Janssen: Honoraria|MSD: Honoraria|ViiV: Honoraria Anton Pozniak, MD, FRCP, Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Honoraria|Janssen: Grant/Research Support|Janssen: Honoraria|Merck: Honoraria|theratec: Honoraria|ViiV: Grant/Research Support|ViiV: Honoraria Chloe Orkin, MBChB, FRCP, MD, Gilead Sciences: Honoraria|GSK: Honoraria|Janssen: Honoraria|MSD: Honoraria Juan Manuel Tiraboschi, PhD, Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Janssen: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen: Grant/Research Support|MSD: Advisor/Consultant|MSD: Grant/Research Support|ViiV Healthcare: Advisor/Consultant|ViiV Healthcare: Grant/Research Support Debbie P. Hagins, MD, FAPCR, AAHIVS, Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences: Speakers Bureau|Janssen: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|ViiV: Advisor/Consultant|ViiV: Grant/Research Support Hailin Huang, PhD, Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employer|Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Kristin Andreatta, MSc, Gilead Sciences, Inc: Employee of Gilead Sciences|Gilead Sciences, Inc: Stocks/Bonds Nathan Unger, PharmD, AAHIVP, Gilead Sciences: Employee|Gilead Sciences: Stocks/Bonds Jason Hindman, PharmD, MBA, Gilead Sciences: Employee|Gilead Sciences: Stocks/Bonds Hal Martin, MD, Gilead Sciences: employee|Gilead Sciences: Stocks/Bonds Jared Baeten, MD, PhD, Gilead Sciences: Employee|Gilead Sciences: Stocks/Bonds Olayemi Osiyemi, MD, Gilead: Advisor/Consultant|gsk: Advisor/Consultant|viiv: Advisor/Consultant.

226. Higher Doses of Adintrevimab, an Extended Half-Life Monoclonal Antibody, for the Treatment and Prevention of COVID-19: Preliminary Results from a Phase 1 Single Ascending-Dose Study

Abstract Background Adintrevimab is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody engineered to have potent and broad neutralization against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and other SARS-like CoVs with pandemic potential. Adintrevimab is being assessed in two separate phase 2/3 clinical trials: the EVADE trial for prevention of COVID-19 in both post-exposure and pre-exposure settings and the STAMP trial for treatment of COVID-19. Here we report higher doses being evaluated in a healthy volunteer study given that emerging variants may have varying susceptibilities to adintrevimab. Previous results 300 mg IM, 600 mg IM, and 500 mg IV cohorts have been reported. Methods This is an ongoing Phase 1, randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled, single ascending-dose study of adintrevimab administered intramuscularly (IM) or intravenously (IV) to healthy adults aged 18–50 years with no current SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants were randomized 8:2 in 3 high dose cohorts (N=10/cohort: n=8 adintrevimab, n=2 PBO): adintrevimab 1200 mg IM, 1200 mg IV, and 4500 mg IV. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) were assessed up to 21 days post dose. Results Overall, 30 participants received adintrevimab (n=24) or PBO (n=6). Blinded safety data for all cohorts and PK for 1200 mg IV are reported. Through 21 days post dose all doses were well-tolerated, with no study drug-related adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, injection site reactions, or hypersensitivity reactions reported. The observed PK profile of the 1200 mg IV dose included Cmax of 423±105 µg/ml. Comparison of 500 mg and 1200 mg IV doses indicate dose proportionality of Cmax and exposure (AUC Day 21). Conclusion A single dose of adintrevimab, up to 4500 mg, was well tolerated. These preliminary safety data and PK support potential use of higher doses of adintrevimab as needed to address emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Disclosures Xia Pu, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics: Employee|Adagio Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Jean Gong, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics: Employee|Adagio Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Ed Campanaro, BSN, MSHS, Adagio Therapeutics: Employee|Adagio Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Kristin Narayan, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics: Employee|Adagio Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Deepali Gupta, B.Sc, Adagio Therapeutics: Employee|Adagio Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Frank Engler, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant Amanda Copans, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics: Employee|Adagio Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Pete Schmidt, MD, Adagio Therapeutics: Employee|Adagio Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds.

Efficacy and safety of 400 mg efavirenz versus standard 600 mg dose when taken with tenofovir and lamivudine combination in Indian adult patients with HIV-1 infection: An open-label, interventional, randomized, non-inferiority trial

To evaluate the non-inferiority of low dose efavirenz (400 mg) to standard dose efavirenz (600 mg), when taken in combination with tenofovir and lamivudine in Indian patients with HIV-1 infection. An open-label, interventional phase IV study with blinded assessment was conducted across 17 sites in India. HIV-1-infected antiretroviral therapy-naive adult patients (≥18 years of age) with a plasma HIV-1 viral load of at least 1000 copies per mL were randomized to receive either tenofovir/lamivudine/efavirenz (TLE) 400 or TLE 600. The primary endpoint was the difference in the proportion of patients achieving < 200 copies per mL at the end of 24 weeks. A total of 265 patients were enrolled and were randomized in 1:1 ratio to TLE 400 group (130 patients) and TLE 600 group (135 patients). At week 24, the proportion of patients with a viral load of less than 200 copies per mL was 80.70% for TLE 400 and 78.95% for TLE 600 (difference 1.75%, 90% confidence interval: -7.01, 10.49) which was within the predefined margin of -10% (90% confidence interval). Significantly lower study drug-related adverse events were observed in TLE 400 group compared to TLE 600 group (52.30%, n = 68 vs 64.92%, n = 87; P = .037). The treatment discontinuation percentage was marginally higher by 2.08% in TLE 600 group. The fixed-dose combination of TLE 400 is non-inferior to TLE 600 in terms of viral suppression and has an improved safety profile over 24 weeks in adult Indian patients with HIV-1 infection.

Low-Concentration Norepinephrine Infusion for Major Surgery: A Safety and Feasibility Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Prevention of hypotension during the intra- and postoperative period is an important goal. Peripheral administration of low-concentration norepinephrine may be a safe and effective strategy to reduce the risk of hypotension. We conducted a 2-center, randomized pilot feasibility trial, with a target of 60 adult patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. We randomized patients to receive a peripheral low-concentration (10 µg/mL) norepinephrine or placebo (saline 0.9%) infusion. The study drug infusion was titrated to achieve a minimum systolic blood pressure target, preselected within 10% of baseline value and within the range limit 100 to 120 mm Hg during surgery and for up to 4 or 24 hours postoperatively. We achieved a high consent rate (84%), successful study drug administration throughout surgery (98% of patients) and absence of unblinding. There were no important study drug-related adverse events. The average intraoperative systolic blood pressure was 120 ± 12.6 mm Hg in the norepinephrine group and 115 ± 14.9 mm Hg in the placebo group. The mean difference between the intraoperative systolic blood pressure achieved less the preselected minimum systolic blood pressure target was 10.0 ± 12.7 mm Hg in the norepinephrine group and 2.9 ± 14.7 mm Hg in the placebo group; difference in means, 7.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-14.0) mm Hg. A future large trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of peripheral administration of low-concentration norepinephrine during the perioperative period is feasible, and likely to achieve a minimum systolic blood pressure threshold.

633. Preliminary Results from a Phase 1 Single Ascending-Dose Study Assessing Safety, Serum Viral Neutralizing Antibody Titers (sVNA), and Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of ADG20: an Extended Half-Life Monoclonal Antibody Being Developed for the Treatment and Prevention of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)

BackgroundADG20 is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody engineered to have high potency and broad neutralization against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and other SARS-like CoVs with pandemic potential by binding to a highly conserved epitope in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein. The Fc region of ADG20 has been modified to provide an extended half-life. ADG20 is in clinical development for the treatment and prevention of COVID-19.MethodsThis is an ongoing Phase 1, randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled, single ascending-dose study of ADG20 administered intramuscularly (IM) or intravenously (IV) to healthy adults aged 18–50 years with no evidence of prior or current SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants were randomized 8:2 in 3 cohorts (N=10/cohort: n=8 ADG20, n=2 PBO): ADG20 300 mg IM, 500 mg IV, and 600 mg IM. Safety, tolerability, PK, and sVNA titers were assessed up to 3 months post dose. Serum ADG20 concentrations were measured with a validated hybrid ligand binding liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (MS)/MS assay. sVNA titers against authentic SARS-CoV-2 were determined by a plaque reduction neutralization assay.ResultsOverall, 30 participants received ADG20 (n=24) or PBO (n=6). Blinded safety data for all cohorts and PK/sVNA titer data for the 300 mg IM cohort are reported. Through a minimum of 10 weeks post dose, no study drug-related adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, injection site reactions, or hypersensitivity reactions were reported. The observed preliminary PK profile was dose proportional, consistent with an extended half-life monoclonal antibody, and well predicted by translational physiologically-based PK modeling. The measured 50% sVNA titer (MN50; geometric mean [coefficient of variation, %]) was 1382 (32.7%) 13 days after a single 300 mg IM dose. These values are within the range of peak serum neutralizing antibody titers reported for COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.ConclusionA single dose of ADG20, up to 600 mg IM, was well tolerated. Preliminary PK and sVNA titer profiles support the ongoing Phase 2/3 trials of ADG20 at a 300 mg IM dose for the prevention of COVID-19 (EVADE: NCT04859517) and treatment of ambulatory patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 (STAMP: NCT04805671).Disclosures Helen Paguntalan, MD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Zoltán Magyarics, MD, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Consultant) Lynn E. Connolly, MD, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Ellie Hershberger, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Kristin Narayan, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Deepali Gupta, BS, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Paul G. Ambrose, PharmD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Frank Engler, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Ed Campanaro, BSN, MSHS, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee) Anita F. Das, PhD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Consultant) Pete Schmidt, MD, Adagio Therapeutics, Inc. (Employee)

502 Recommended phase 2 dose, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of the IL-15 superagonist SO-C101 as monotherapy in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors

BackgroundSO-C101 is a superagonist fusion protein of IL-15 and the IL-15 receptor α sushi+ domain. SO-C101 was investigated in a multicenter, open-label, dose escalation study as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with selected advanced/metastatic tumors (NCT04234113).MethodsThe SO-C101 monotherapy part of the study followed a classical 3+3 dose escalation design. Study objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D).The evaluation period for dose-limiting toxicities in each dose step was 21 days. The RP2D was defined as MTD or below, also considering pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters.The study is ongoing (data cut-off 21 June 2021).ResultsThirty patients with a median of 3 (range 1–9) lines of previous systemic therapies were treated at doses 0.25, 0.75, 1.5, 3.0, 6.0., 9.0, 12.0, and 15 µg/kg. At 15 µg/kg, 2 of 3 patients had a dose-limiting toxicity (hyperbilirubinaemia grade [G] 4 and transaminase increase G3). The MTD was reached at 12 µg/kg. This dose was determined as the RP2D, supported by a dose-dependent increase in NK- and CD8+ T cell activation, the latter reaching a plateau at 12 µg/kg. SO-C101 plasma concentration increased dose-proportionally (Tmax was 5.5 hours and T1/2 was 4 hours).The most common adverse events (AEs) were G1 or G2 lymphopenia, local injection site reactions, transaminase increase, flu-like syndrome, and CRS-related symptoms such as fever and chills. Study drug-related AEs &gt;G2 that occurred more than once were lymphopenia and transaminase increase. No treatment-related death was reported.One patient with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, who had previously progressed on cemiplimab, showed a partial response at 6.0 µg/kg (duration &gt;4 months, target lesion decrease of 58%). After progression, the patient was put on combination treatment (SO-C101 and pembrolizumab) and again achieved a significant partial response. Two other patients treated with doses below the RP2D had confirmed stable disease for 6 and 15 weeks.At the RP2D, one patient out of 6 discontinued due to progression, while 5 are stable and receiving treatment (range 4–11 weeks).ConclusionsThe RP2D was defined at 12 µg/kg. SO-C101 administration induced a strong activation of peripheral NK and CD8+ T cells reproducible after each dosing. Related AEs were manageable and resolved quickly. Preliminary clinical efficacy signals including stable disease and partial response were observed in this heavily pretreated patient population. SO-C101 monotherapy has the potential to provide additional clinical benefit to patients with solid tumors.Trial RegistrationNCT04234113Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by the FDA (IND 140011) and by the Ethics Boards of participating institutions.

Fixed-dose combination bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide in adolescents and children with HIV: week 48 results of a single-arm, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial

Bictegravir is a potent integrase strand-transfer inhibitor (INSTI) with a high genetic barrier to resistance. Bictegravir, coformulated with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide, is recommended by key European and US HIV treatment guidelines as the preferred single-tablet regimen for adults and adolescents. The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of switching to this regimen in virologically suppressed children and adolescents with HIV. In this single-arm, open-label trial, we enrolled virologically suppressed children and adolescents (aged 6 to <18 years) with HIV at 22 hospital clinics in South Africa, Thailand, Uganda, and the USA. Eligible participants had a bodyweight of at least 25 kg, were virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL) on a stable ART regimen for at least 6 months before screening, had a CD4 count of at least 200 cells per μL, and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of at least 90 mL/min per 1·73 m2 by the Schwartz formula at screening. All participants received the fixed-dose regimen of coformulated bictegravir 50 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg once daily. Pharmacokinetic analysis was used for dosing confirmation, and results compared with adult values. The primary outcomes were area under the curve at the end of the dosing interval (AUCtau) and concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Ctau) of bictegravir, and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and laboratory abnormalities at week 24. Efficacy and safety analyses included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. We report the 48-week results. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02881320. Between Sept 29, 2016 and Feb 16, 2018, we enrolled 102 participants. 100 participants received bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (cohort 1 [adolescents aged 12 to <18 years], n=50; cohort 2 [children aged 6 to <12 years], n=50). The mean bictegravir AUCtau was 89 100 ng × h/mL (coefficient of variation 31·0%) in adolescents (cohort 1) and 128 000 ng × h/mL (27·8%) in children (cohort 2). Compared with adults, bictegravir Ctau was 35% lower in adolescents and 11% lower in children. The 90% CIs of both parameters were within the predefined pharmacokinetic equivalence boundary and within overall range of exposures observed in adults and deemed to be safe and efficacious (geometric least-squares mean ratio [GLSM] 86·3% [90% CI 80·0-93·0] for AUCtau and 65·4% [58·3-73·3] for Ctau in adolescents; GLSM 125% [90% CI 117-134] for AUCtau and 88·9% [80·6-98·0] for Ctau for children). Bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide was well tolerated; most adverse events were grade 2 or less in severity and no study drug-related serious adverse events were reported. One participant discontinued study drug due to adverse events (grade 2 insomnia and anxiety). Virological suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL) was maintained by all 100 participants at week 24 and by 98 (98%) of 100 at week 48; no participants had treatment-emergent resistance. In adolescents and children with HIV, the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide single-tablet regimen was well tolerated and maintained virological suppression. Our data support the treatment of HIV in adolescents and children with this single-tablet regimen. At present, the single-tablet regimen is recommended as first-line treatment in the USA for adolescents and as an alternative regimen in children and has the potential to represent an important regimen in the paediatric population. Gilead Sciences.

Metyrapone Treatment in Endogenous Cushing’s Syndrome: Results at Week 12 From PROMPT, a Prospective International Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase III/IV Study

Background: Metyrapone is a steroidogenesis inhibitor approved in Europe for the treatment of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome (CS) based on observational retrospective studies published over more than 50 years. We present data from the first prospective study designed to confirm metyrapone efficacy and good tolerance in patients with CS. Methods: This single arm, open-label, multicenter, international trial enrolled 50 patients with CS who had three baseline 24 hours urine free cortisol (UFC) values at least 50% above the upper limit of normal (ULN=165 nmol/24h). Metyrapone was titrated over 12 weeks (W12) to achieve normal urine (mean of 3 values, mUFC) and serum cortisol levels. Patients whose mUFC did not exceed 2-fold the ULN could enter a 6-month extension period. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with mUFC ≤ ULN at W12 assessed in a central laboratory using LC-MS/MS. The most important secondary endpoint was mUFC decrease of ≥ 50% at W12. Results: At baseline: mean age was 47 years, median mUFC (range) was 570 (291 - 8476) nmol/24h (3.5 x ULN). Hypercortisolism was in 96% of patients either moderate (mUFC ≥ 2xULN; < 5x ULN) in 63% or severe (≥5 x ULN) in 33%. Hypertension (69%) and diabetes mellitus (47%) were the most common comorbidities. At W12: 47% (23/ 49) met primary endpoint. Another 40% (19 / 49) had mUFC ≤ 2xULN. Median percentage decrease in mUFC from baseline to W12 was -74%. Secondary endpoint was met by 80% of patients who had a mUFC decrease of 50%. Final median metyrapone dose was 1500 (250; 5500) mg/day. Physical signs and symptoms were normalized or improved in 66% of patients. Circulating cholesterol, HbA1C and fasting glucose and insulin improved with median decrease of 12%, 3%, 5% and 9% respectively and median systolic and diastolic blood pressure also decreased by 4 and 5mmHg respectively. Among patients with antihypertensive treatments, 10 (31%) had a decrease in number of drugs and 5 (16%) had an increase in number of drugs during the study. Median ACTH increased by 11 % from baseline.Twenty six (52%) patients experienced mild to moderate study drug related adverse events (AEs). One patient discontinued before W12 because of an unrelated SAE on day 2 (pneumonia with septic shock). The most common AEs were nausea (24%), decreased appetite (18%), fatigue (14%), headache (10%), peripheral edema (6.0%), hypokalemia (6.0%) and hypertension (6.0%). Reversible adrenal insufficiency occurred in 6 (12%) patients. Few patients 14% (7/50) experienced at least one AE that led to a dose interruption or dose adjustment. Cushing Quality of Life Questionnaire increased of 10 points from baseline which is close to minimal clinically important difference = 10.1. Conclusions: This prospective study in patients with CS confirms that metyrapone effectively lowers UFC levels with a tolerability profile similar to the previously reported safety profile and improves QoL, at Week 12.

Dose Escalating and Bioavailability Phase 1 Studies Assessing Safety and Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Tildacerfont, a Small-Molecule CRF1 Receptor Antagonist

Background: Tildacerfont (SPR001; LY2371712), a second generation, potent, selective, nonsteroidal, oral small-molecule antagonist of corticotropin-releasing factor type-1 (CRF1) receptors in the pituitary gland, is in late stage development as a potential treatment for adults with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency (21-OHD). We report the results of 3 randomized Phase 1 studies of safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of tildacerfont in healthy adults and compare the relative bioavailability of 2 tildacerfont formulations. Methods: Two Phase 1 studies were double-blind, placebo-controlled and evaluated escalating doses (2–800 mg QD) as single doses (SAD; n=18) and 50-200mg as multiple doses (MAD; n=47). The studies also included pilot food effect and drug-drug interaction sub studies, respectively. A randomized, balanced, open-label, crossover study (n=42) examined the relative bioavailability (BA) of single oral doses of 2 tildacerfont formulations, 200 mg powder-in-capsule (PIC) compared to 200 mg low-drug load tablet. Results: In the SAD and MAD studies, the most common, non-procedural adverse events were headache and cough. In the BA study, the most common, non-procedural adverse events were constipation and headache. There were no study drug-related serious adverse events (SAEs) in any study. In the SAD and MAD (PIC formulation), tildacerfont concentrations declined in a multi-exponential manner with Cmax occurring moderately late, ~5 hours post dose, and a high degree of variability was observed in AUC and Cmax (CV range: 54–122%). A food effect was observed in the SAD. Fourteen days of dosing achieved near steady state exposure with an AUC accumulation ratio of 2.51 to 3.65 in the MAD study. Midazolam, a sensitive probe substrate for CYP3A4 exhibited ~2-fold increase in AUC and a 1.8 increase in Cmax when co-administered with tildacerfont suggesting moderate CYP3A4 inhibition. The tablet formulation reduced the variability (AUC and Cmax CV range: 69–72%) compared to the PIC formulation resulting in a more predictable pharmacokinetic profile. The half-life of the tablet was ~60 hrs. Bioequivalence in AUC was established with the tablet and PIC formulations (fed state) with Cmax ~20% higher for tablet than PIC due to a reduction in and more consistent Tmax, median [range], from 6 [4.5, 24] hours to 3 [2, 6] hours. Conclusions: These results suggest that tildacerfont is safe and generally well-tolerated in healthy adults and suitable for further study in patients with CAH. The tablet formulation provided a more consistent pharmacokinetic profile with reduced variability in all parameters and is being evaluated in late stage studies of tildacerfont in adult CAH.

Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in Virologically Suppressed People with HIV Aged ≥ 65 Years: Week 48 Results of a Phase 3b, Open-Label Trial.

IntroductionWe report the 48-week results of an ongoing study to assess the efficacy and safety of switching older people with HIV to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF).MethodsThis was a 96-week, phase 3b, open-label, single-arm study (GS-US-380-4449; NCT03405935). Virologically suppressed individuals aged ≥ 65 years receiving elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide or a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based regimen were switched to B/F/TAF. Primary endpoint was the percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml at week 24.ResultsEighty-six participants (median age 69 [range 65–80] years; 87% male; 95% white) were enrolled and treated in five European countries. Rates of virologic suppression were 97.7% at week 24 and 90.7% at week 48; none had HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/ml, and 100% had virologic suppression by missing = excluded analysis at both time points. No treatment-emergent resistance was observed. There were no grade 3–4 study drug-related adverse events (AEs) or study drug-related serious AEs or deaths. Three AEs led to premature discontinuation; one (moderate abdominal discomfort) was attributed to the study drug by the investigator. At week 48, median changes from baseline in weight and estimated glomerular filtration rate were + 0.1 kg (interquartile range [IQR] − 1.0, 2.3) and − 6.0 ml/min (IQR − 10.2, 0.0), respectively. There were no clinically relevant changes from baseline to week 48 in fasting lipid parameters. Treatment satisfaction improved, and health-related quality of life was maintained from baseline through week 48. Median adherence to the study drug was 98.6% (IQR 96.0, 100).ConclusionsSwitching to B/F/TAF was effective and well tolerated through 48 weeks in virologically suppressed adults aged ≥ 65 years.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03405935.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-021-00419-5.

Cardiovascular safety of mirabegron in individuals treated for spinal cord injury- or multiple sclerosis-induced neurogenic detrusor overactivity.

To analyze cardiovascular safety of mirabegron in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI)- and multiple sclerosis (MS)-induced neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Seventy-eight patients were enrolled into the study, and 66 of them were included into the final analysis. In 49 (74.2%), NDO developed due to suprasacral SCI, 17 (25.8%) suffered from NDO due to MS. Eleven patients were previously treated for hypertension and one for arrhythmia. All study participants received placebo for 2weeks run-in period. Subsequently, eligible subjects were randomized for 4weeks of active treatment with mirabegron 50mg once daily (Group A; n = 32) or placebo (Group B; n = 34). Data from resting electrocardiography (ECG), 24-h ECG and blood pressure monitoring, and echocardiographic examination, were used for cardiovascular safety assessment. All reported variables were evaluated at time of randomization and at the end of the study. Longitudinal changes of variables within the groups and differences between the groups were assessed using nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test, and p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. No statistically significant longitudinal changes were found in safety variables, except for prolongation of QT interval in placebo group (p = 0.0328) recorded by resting ECG. No significant difference between the Groups A and B, in any of the variables, was observed. A single cardiovascular study drug-related adverse event was recorded in a patient with cervical SCI (3.13%). Our results suggest that mirabegron can be safely used in the treatment of patients with SCI- and MS-induced NDO.

Ibudilast (MN-166) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis- an open label, safety and pharmacodynamic trial

Ibudilast (MN-166) is an inhibitor of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and phosphodiesterases 3,4,10 and 11 (Gibson et al., 2006; Cho et al., 2010). Ibudilast attenuates CNS microglial activation and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Fujimoto et al., 1999; Cho et al., 2010). In vitro evidence suggests that ibudilast is neuroprotective by suppressing neuronal cell death induced by microglial activation. People with ALS have increased microglial activation measured by [11C]PBR28-PET in the motor cortices. The primary objective is to determine the impact of ibudilast on reducing glial activation and neuroaxonal loss in ALS, measured by PBR28-PET and serum Neurofilament light (NfL). The secondary objectives included determining safety and tolerability of ibudilast high dosage (up to 100 mg/day) over 36 weeks.In this open label trial, 35 eligible ALS participants underwent ibudilast treatment up to 100 mg/day for 36 weeks. Of these, 30 participants were enrolled in the main study cohort and were included in biomarker, safety and tolerability analyses. Five additional participants were enrolled in the expanded access arm, who did not meet imaging eligibility criteria and were included in the safety and tolerability analyses. The primary endpoints were median change from baseline in (a) PBR28-PET uptake in primary motor cortices, measured by standard uptake value ratio (SUVR) over 12–24 weeks and (b) serum NfL over 36–40 weeks. The secondary safety and tolerability endpoints were collected through Week 40.The baseline median (range) of PBR28-PET SUVR was 1.033 (0.847, 1.170) and NfL was 60.3 (33.1, 219.3) pg/ml. Participants who completed both pre and post-treatment scans had PBR28-PET SUVR median(range) change from baseline of 0.002 (−0.184, 0.156) , P = 0.5 (n = 22). The median(range) NfL change from baseline was 0.4 pg/ml (−1.8, 17.5), P = 0.2 (n = 10 participants). 30(86%) participants experienced at least one, possibly study drug related adverse event. 13(37%) participants could not tolerate 100 mg/day and underwent dose reduction to 60–80 mg/day and 11(31%) participants discontinued study drug early due to drug related adverse events.The study concludes that following treatment with ibudilast up to 100 mg/day in ALS participants, there were no significant reductions in (a) motor cortical glial activation measured by PBR28-PET SUVR over 12–24 weeks or (b) CNS neuroaxonal loss, measured by serum NfL over 36–40 weeks. Dose reductions and discontinuations due to treatment emergent adverse events were common at this dosage in ALS participants. Future pharmacokinetic and dose-finding studies of ibudilast would help better understand tolerability and target engagement in ALS.