Study 36-item Health Survey Questionnaire Research Articles

Cancer Rehabilitation Publications (2008-2018) With a Focus on Physical Function: A Scoping Review.

Cancer rehabilitation research has accelerated over the last decade. However, closer examination of the published literature reveals that the majority of this work has focused on psychological interventions and cognitive and behavioral therapies. Recent initiatives have aggregated expert consensus around research priorities, highlighting a dearth in research regarding measurement of and interventions for physical function. Increasingly loud calls for the need to address the myriad of physical functional impairments that develop in people living with and beyond cancer have been published in the literature. A detailed survey of the landscape of published research has not been reported to our knowledge. This scoping review systematically identified literature published between 2008 and 2018 related to the screening, assessment, and interventions associated with physical function in people living with and beyond cancer. PubMed and CINAHL were searched up to September 2018. Study selection included articles of all levels of evidence on any disease stage and population. A total of 11,483 articles were screened for eligibility, 2507 full-text articles were reviewed, and 1055 articles were selected for final inclusion and extraction. Seven reviewers recorded type of cancer, disease stage, age of participants, phase of treatment, time since diagnosis, application to physical function, study design, impairments related to physical function, and measurement instruments used. Approximately one-third of the articles included patients with various cancer diagnoses (30.3%), whereas the rest focused on a single cancer, most commonly breast (24.8%). Most articles (77%) measured physical function following the completion of active cancer treatment with 64% representing the assessment domain. The most commonly used measures of physical function were the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Health Survey Questionnaire (29%) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Cancer 30 (21.5%). Studies not written in English, study protocols, conference abstracts, and unpublished data were excluded. This review elucidated significant inconsistencies in the literature regarding language used to define physical function, measurement tools used to characterize function, and the use of those tools across the cancer treatment and survivorship trajectory. The findings suggested that physical function in cancer research is predominantly measured using general health-related quality-of-life tools rather than more precise functional assessment tools. Interdisciplinary and clinician-researcher collaborative efforts should be directed toward a unified definition and assessment of physical function.

Cycling With Functional Electrical Stimulation in an Adult With Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy

Adults with cerebral palsy (CP) are at risk for decreased mobility and health complications, and exercise may combat some of these negative changes. Because people with CP have difficulty generating sufficient muscle force, exercise augmented with functional electrical stimulation (FES) is an option for increasing exercise intensity. This mixed-method (quantitative-qualitative) case report describes the effects-across the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model-of cycling with FES (FES cycling) in an adult with CP. An ambulatory 49-year-old man with spastic diplegic CP cycled with FES at home for 30 minutes, 3 times per week, for 12 weeks. Volitional efforts were augmented by FES of the bilateral quadriceps, gastrocnemius, and gluteal muscles. Testing was performed before and after the intervention and 4 weeks after intervention withdrawal. After training, quadriceps muscle strength (force-generating capacity) improved by 22.2%, hamstring muscle strength improved by 18.5%, and the Timed "Up & Go" Test time decreased from 11.9 to 9.0 seconds. The patient reported increased performance and satisfaction for self-identified goals at the ICF level of participation, and his score on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Health Survey questionnaire increased from 62.1 to 77.6. However, he reported increased back pain, which he attributed to positioning while cycling. Qualitative interviews provided context (the patient's perspective) for some of the quantitative results. The patient made gains in body structure and function, activity, and participation (ICF levels) after FES cycling. The mixed-method approach provided insight into his experiences and perceptions about the measures assessed quantitatively. Further investigation on FES cycling in this population as well as positioning during cycling is warranted.