MEDICINE AS A DEPENDENT TRADITION: HISTORICAL AND ETHICAL REFLECTIONS RICHARD VANCE* In 1982, Howard Brody noted that medical ethics is now in its third generation [I]. The metaphor is a helpful reminder of important changes in the relatively short history of modern medical ethics. The first generation was characterized by physicians' attitudes and reflections on ethical issues. The second generation consisted of careful analyses of ethical issues by professional ethicists. The third generation, clearly the most important phase of medical ethics to date, is marked by Edmund Pellegrino and David Thomasma's A PhilosophicalBasis ofMedicalPractice [2] and Robert Veatch's A Theory ofMedicalEthics [S]. Both books involve systematic presentation ofmedical ethics. In many ways, these two books have defined the arena within which future work in medical ethics will be done. Despite marked differences in style and perspective, they share important purposes. They attempt not only to define what medical practice ought to be in a liberal pluralistic society but also to describe what moral foundations the medical profession does and should have [2, pp. 170-191, 260-280; 3, pp. 324-330]. In addition, both systems attempt to resolve a number of peisvasive tensions 'n modern medicine. The authors agree that these tensions arise from the conflict between the traditional assumptions and structure of medical practice, on the one hand, and the liberal presuppositions of modern society, on the other [2, pp. 10, 38; 3, p. 3]. The conflict is manifested in the institutional struggle of medicine to remain a classical craft and in the tensions so widely recognized in the doctor-patient relationship . Physicians also experience this conflict at a personal level as they try to decide what place medicine ought to have in their lives. The author is indebted toJohn Sykes, Robert W. Prichard, and James M. Gustafson for numerous helpful comments and criticisms during the preparation of this essay. ?Department of Pathology, Wake Forest University Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103.© 1985 by The University of Chicago. AU rights reserved. 0031-5982/85/2802-0429$01 .00 282 I Richard Vance · Medicine as a Dependent Tradition Should medicine be a craft or a business? a vocation or ajob? a constellation of virtues or a role? The efforts of Pellegrino, Thomasma, and Veatch to resolve these tensions are not new. Seeking resolutions of this sort has been a persistent theme in all three generations ofmedical ethics [4-7]. What is new about the third generation is the systematic approach to these problems. Therefore, neither system considers the tensions that pervade modern medicine to be inevitable or ineradicable. If such were the case, the best medical ethics might be able to do would be to help preserve those tensions in nondestructive ways. After the efforts of two generations of medical ethicists, such a conclusion would be both disconcerting and unappealing. However, Pellegrino, Thomasma, and Veatch do not avoid important issues simply because they are unpalatable. Indeed, the only adequate reason they ignore this possibility is, I believe, a deeply held conviction: if tensions are present, they can (at least in principle) be resolved. To say the least, Pellegrino, Thomasma, and Veatch are not the first to depend on such an assumption. However, these common purposes and presuppositions do not ameliorate important differences in their interpretations of contemporary tensions or in their suggested solutions. For Pellegrino and Thomasma, the tensions are resolved by establishing the unique and fundamental importance ofclinical experience and by developing a language that can articulate it coherently [2, pp. 47-65]. The tensions are not so much tensions as they are a collection of unfortunate incongruities that can be eliminated by the proper synthetic categories [2, pp. 10, 17, 19]. For Veatch, the tensions are the result of paternalistic and presumptuous motives on the part ofthe medical profession and need to be eliminated by making medical practice more thoroughly contractual and egalitarian [3, pp. 10-11]. Pellegrino and Thomasma move an uncertain medical practice in the direction of a coherent, reconstructed profession that can show our liberal pluralistic society the fundamental coherence that underlies important aspects of human experience [2, pp. 22—27, 31—32]. Veatch moves the profession of medicine into the arena...
Read full abstract