Structural Valve Deterioration Research Articles

Procedural and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing a TAVI in TAVI procedure: Rationale and design of the multicentre, prospective, observational ReTAVI registry.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is increasingly being used in younger patients and those with lower peri-procedural risk, meaning more patients will live long enough to experience structural valve deterioration (SVD) of the bioprosthesis, indicating repeated TAVI. Experience of repeated TAVI-transcatheter heart valve (THV) implantation into an index THV is limited. This registry aims to assess the peri-procedural and short-term safety, efficacy and durability of repeated TAVI. The ReTAVI Prospective observational registry is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, international, prospective registry of patients undergoing repeated TAVI using balloon-expandable SAPIEN prosthesis to evaluate procedural and short-term safety, efficacy and durability as well as anatomical and procedural factors associated with optimal results. The registry will enrol at least 150 patients across 60 high-volume centres. Patients must be ≥18 years old, have had procedural success with their first TAVI, have index THV device failure, intend to undergo repeated TAVI and be considered suitable candidates by their local Heart Team. All patients will undergo a 30-day and 12-month follow-up. The estimated study completion is 2025. The registry will collect pre-, peri-, postoperative and 12-months data on patients undergoing repeated TAVI procedures with THVs for failure of the index THV and determine VARC-3-defined efficacy and safety at 30 days and functional outcome at 12 months. The registry will expand existing data sets and identify patient characteristics/indicators related to complications and clinical benefits for patients with symptomatic severe calcific degenerative aortic stenosis.

Ten-year Durability, Hemodynamic Performance, and Clinical Outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using a Self-expanding Device.

The expansion of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to low-risk and younger patients has increased the relevance of the long-term durability of transcatheter heart valves (THV). The present study aims to assess the 10-year durability, hemodynamic performance, and clinical outcomes after TAVI using the CoreValve system. An analysis from a prospective registry with predefined clinical and echocardiographic follow-up included 302 patients who underwent TAVI with the CoreValve system between 2007 and 2015. Bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) was defined as any bioprosthetic valve dysfunction-related death, re-intervention, or severe hemodynamic valve deterioration. At the time of TAVI, the mean age was 80.41 ± 7.01years, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score was 6.13 ± 5.23%. At latest follow-up (median [IQR]: 5 [2-7] years), cumulative all-cause mortality ratesat 3, 5, 7, and 10years was 23.7%, 40%, 65.8%, and 89.8%, respectively. Mean aortic valve area and transvalvular gradient post-TAVI and at 5, 7, and 10years were 1.94, 1.87, 1.69, and 1.98 cm2 (p = 0.236) and 8.3, 9.0, 8.2, and 10.1mmHg (p = 0.796), respectively. Overall, 11 patients had BVF, of whom six had structural valve deterioration (SVD). The 10-year actual and actuarial freedom from BVF was 96.1% and 78.8%, and from SVD was 97.9% and 80.9%, respectively. Three patients developed significant non-SVD due to severe paravalvular leakage, and two patients were diagnosed with infective endocarditis. Using an early-generation self-expanding bioprosthesis, we documented durable hemodynamic performance and low rates of BVF and SVD up to 10 years after TAVI.

Five-Year Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes in Chronic Hemodialysis vs. Non-Hemodialysis Patients Using Balloon-Expandable Devices.

Based on the results of a clinical trial in Japan, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for hemodialysis (HD) patients gained approval; however, mid-term TAVR outcomes and transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) durability in HD patients remain unexplored.Methods and Results: We analyzed background, procedural, in-hospital outcome, and follow-up data for 101 HD patients and 494 non-HD patients who underwent TAVR using balloon-expandable valves (SAPIEN XT or SAPIEN 3) retrieved from Osaka University Hospital TAVR database. Periprocedural mortality and TAVR-related complications were comparable between HD and non-HD patients. However, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that HD patients had significantly lower survival rates (log-rank test, P<0.001). In addition, HD patients had significantly higher rates of severe structural valve deterioration (SVD) than non-HD patients (Gray test, P=0.038). TAVR in HD patients had comparable periprocedural mortality but inferior mid-term survival and TAV durability than in non-HD patients. Indications for TAVR in younger HD patients should be carefully determined, considering the possibility of a TAV-in-TAV procedure when early SVD occurs.

Macroscopic findings of severe structural valve deterioration of a transcatheter aortic bioprosthesis.

Macroscopic findings of severe structural valve deterioration of a transcatheter aortic bioprosthesis.

Aortic Regurgitation, Time to Aortic Valve Reintervention, and Mortality in Degenerated Trifecta Versus Non-Trifecta Bioprosthesis

On July 31, 2023, the Trifecta valve was withdrawn from the market after concerns regarding early (≤5 years) structural valve deterioration (SVD), mainly as aortic regurgitation (AR). Our aim was to determine the timing, mechanism, and impact of bioprosthetic SVD in patients who underwent redo aortic valve replacement (redo-AVR) with either redo-SAVR or valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using Trifecta versus other bioprosthetic valves. Patients who underwent redo-AVR for SVD at our institution were categorized into 2 groups based on the valve type: Trifecta versus non-Trifecta. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare mortality. A total of 171 patients were included; 58 (34%) had previous SAVR with a Trifecta valve and 113 (66%) with non-Trifecta valve. A total of 103 patients (60%) underwent valve-in-valve TAVR and 68 redo-SAVR (40%). The age, gender, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score were similar between Trifecta and non-Trifecta groups. In patients with bioprosthetic valves requiring redo-AVR, Trifecta valves had an earlier onset of greater than moderate AR (4.5 vs 11.9 years, p <0.001) and earlier time to redo-AVR (5.5 vs 12 years, p <0.001). AR was more common as the mechanism of SVD in Trifecta versus non-Trifecta valves (55.2% vs 30.1%, p = 0.006). All-cause adjusted mortality from index SAVR was higher in the Trifecta than in non-Trifecta group (hazard ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 11.5, p = 0.007). In conclusion, compared with non-Trifecta valves, Trifecta valves exhibit early SVD primarily as AR and progress rapidly to significant SVD requiring redo-AVR. Mortality is significantly higher with Trifecta than in non-Trifecta valves, potentially impacting the results of SAVR versus TAVR studies.

Late Outcomes of Porcine and Pericardial Bioprostheses after Mitral Valve Replacement in 1162 Patients

Debate continues regarding the superiority of porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses, and data relevant to this comparison are scant. We therefore compare late survival and structural valve deterioration of porcine and pericardial mitral valve prostheses. Adults undergoing mitral valve replacement with one first-generation porcine valve model and one pericardial valve line were reviewed from our prospectively-maintained institutional database between 1976 and 2020. Multivariable regression and Cox proportional hazards analysis were used to compare late outcomes. Of 1162 consecutive patients, 612 (53%) received porcine valves and 550 (47%) received pericardial valves. At 10 years, patient survival (porcine 36±2%, pericardial 38±3%, P=0.5) and cumulative incidence (CI) of mitral valve structural deterioration (porcine 18±2%, pericardial 19±3%, P=0.3) were similar. The structural failure mode was more likely severe mitral stenosis in pericardial valves (35/50(70%) versus 38/106(36%), P<0.001), and more likely severe mitral regurgitation in porcine valves (80/106(75%) versus 19/50(38%), P<0.0001). After adjustment, structural deterioration was associated with younger patient age (P<0.001), but not valve type. At 10 years, porcine valves demonstrated a higher CI of mitral reoperation (19±2% vs 9±2%, P<0.001) and reoperation for structural deterioration (15±1% vs 6±2%, P=0.007). We demonstrate similar rates of 10-year survival and structural deterioration with porcine and pericardial bioprosthetics in mitral valve replacement. This study suggests a lack of major improvement in durability of mitral bioprosthetic valves over time. Failure mode may have greater influence on surgeon decision-making of valve choice.

Transcatheter valve-in-valve interventions after aortic root replacement: A systematic review.

Structural valve deterioration after aortic root replacement (ARR) surgery may be treated by transcatheter valve-in-valve (ViV-TAVI) intervention. However, several technical challenges and outcomes are not well described. The aim of the present review was to analyze the outcomes of ViV-TAVI in deteriorated ARR. This review included studies reporting any form of transcatheter valvular intervention in patients with a previous ARR. All forms of ARR were considered, as long as the entire root was replaced. Pubmed, ScienceDirect, SciELO, DOAJ, and Cochrane library databases were searched until September 2023. Overall, 86 patients were included from 31 articles that met our inclusion criteria out of 741 potentially eligible studies. In the entire population, the mean time from ARR to reintervention was 11.0 years (range: 0.33-22). The most frequently performed techniques/grafts for ARR was homograft (67.4%) and the main indication for intervention was aortic regurgitation (69.7%). Twenty-three articles reported no postoperative complications. Six (7.0%) patients required permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after the ViV-TAVI procedure, and 4 (4.7%) patients had a second ViV-TAVI implant. There were three device migrations (3.5%) and 1 stroke (1.2%). Patients with previous ARR present a high surgical risk. ViV-TAVI can be considered in selected patients, despite unique technical challenges that need to be carefully addressed according to the characteristics of the previous surgery and on computed tomography analysis.

Clinical Midterm Results of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement with Sutureless Valves.

Sutureless aortic valves may enable shorter procedure times, which benefits patients with elevated surgical risk. We describe the outcomes of patients with aortic stenosis who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) using the sutureless Perceval aortic bioprosthesis. Data from a retrospective cohort were obtained from a clinical database. The study enrolled patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis who underwent surgical AVR with a sutureless bioprosthesis between August 2015 and December 2020. In total, 113 patients were included (mean age, 75.3±8.4 years; 57.5% women; median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, 9.7%; mean follow-up period, 51.19±20.6 months). Of these patients, 41 were octogenarians (36.2%) and 3 were nonagenarians (2.6%). Transthoracic echocardiography was employed to assess changes in ejection fraction (EF), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), and mean pressure gradient (MPG). The in-hospital mortality rate was 2.6%, and 13 patients developed new-onset atrial fibrillation. A permanent pacemaker was implanted in 3 patients (2.6%). The median intensive care unit stay was 1 day (interquartile range [IQR], 1-2 days), and the median hospital stay was 12 days (IQR, 9.5-15 days). The overall survival rate at 5 years was 95.9%. LVMI and MPG were reduced postoperatively, while EF increased over the follow-up period. No structural valve deterioration was observed, and no meaningful paravalvular leakage developed during follow-up. The use of a sutureless valve in the aortic position is safe and feasible, even for high-risk elderly patients requiring surgical AVR. LVMI and MPG decreased postoperatively, while EF increased over the follow-up period.

Original Article--Mid-term Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes in Middle Age Patients Post Trifecta™ (Abbott) Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single-center Study.

Trifecta™ is an externally wrapped bovine pericardial aortic valve with a favorable hemodynamic performance and acceptable rate of freedom from structural valve degeneration. However, recent reports of early Trifecta valve failure question its durability. Rheumatic valve disease in young population is predominant, there is no data on the Trifecta performance, durability or safety available worldwide over the middle age population, as well as there are no previous similar reports from Middle East region. We report on mid-term clinical and hemodynamic performance of Trifecta valve in middle age population with small aortic annuls, a single center report. A retrospective study of all patients who underwent Trifecta™ SAVR between June 2014 and December 2019 at a cardiac center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Hemodynamic performance was analyzed by longitudinal Doppler echocardiography. During a 5.5-year period, a total of 24 patients underwent SAVR with Trifecta™ valves at our heart center. Patients had a median age of 47.1 years (IQR = 37) and male:female ratio of 1:1. Patients had a median EuroScoreII of 2 (IQR = 1). The 19 mm valve was the most frequently used (29.2%) followed by the 21 mm and 23 mm (both 25.0%). Concomitant procedure was (54.2%). All patients survived their operations and most (87.0%) had their symptoms relieved. A 30-day mortality rate of 4.2%. Patients were followed up for a median of 58.5 months (IQR = 38), during which 8.3% required re interventions, giving an overall freedom from re-intervention of 91.7%. The re-intervention after valve implantation was recorded in two (8.3%). These re-interventions were performed 3 years post initial surgery and were due to structural valve deterioration (SVD). The mean gradient reduced significantly from 43.6 ± 23.9 mmHg (median = 41, IQR = 21) at baseline to 13.0 ± 7.4 mmHg (median = 11, IQR = 5) one-week post intervention (p < 0.001). The average mean gradients were stable from post-operation to follow-up (13.0 ± 7.4 vs 14.1 ± 6.4 mmHg). Our study confirms excellent mid-term durability, clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Trifecta™ valve in middle age population, despite the fact of non-statically significant trend-up of transvalvular gradient over the follow up period. Further long-term studies with larger sample-size are warranted to confirm these results.

Current definitions of hemodynamic structural valve deterioration after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement lack consistency

ObjectiveNew echocardiographic definitions have been proposed for hemodynamic structural valve deterioration. We aimed to study their consistency in classifying structural valve deterioration after surgical aortic valve replacement. MethodsData were used of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement in a multicenter, prospective cohort study with a 5-year follow-up. All patients received the same stented bioprosthesis. Echocardiographic parameters were assessed by an independent core laboratory. Moderate or greater stenotic hemodynamic structural valve deterioration was defined according to Capodanno and colleagues, Dvir and colleagues, and the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3; regurgitation data were not considered in this analysis. Consistency was quantified on the basis of structural valve deterioration classification at subsequent time points. ResultsA total of 1118 patients received implants. Patients’ mean age was 70 years, and 75% were male. Hemodynamic structural valve deterioration at any visit was present in 51 patients (4.6%), 32 patients (2.9%), and 34 patients (3.0%) according to Capodanno, Dvir, and Valve Academic Research Consortium 3. A total of 1064 patients (95%) were never labeled with structural valve deterioration by any definition. After the first classification with structural valve deterioration, 59%, 59%, and 65% had no subsequent structural valve deterioration classification according to Capodanno, Dvir, and Valve Academic Research Consortium 3, respectively. ConclusionsThe current definitions of hemodynamic structural valve deterioration are strong negative predictors but inconsistent positive discriminators for the detection of stenotic hemodynamic structural valve deterioration. Although the diagnosis of structural valve deterioration may be categorical, echocardiographic indices lack this degree of precision in the first 5 years after surgical aortic valve replacement. The inconsistency of current structural valve deterioration definitions impedes the detection of true valve degeneration, which challenges the clinical usefulness of these definitions.

Real-World Outcomes for the Fifth-Generation Balloon Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve in the United States

BackgroundThe fifth-generation SAPIEN 3 Ultra Resilia valve (S3UR) incorporates several design changes as compared with its predecessors, the SAPIEN 3 (S3) and SAPIEN 3 Ultra (S3U) valves, including bovine leaflets treated with a novel process intended to reduce structural valve deterioration via calcification, as well as a taller external skirt on the 29-mm valve size to reduce paravalvular leak (PVL). The clinical performance of S3UR compared with S3 and S3U in a large patient population has not been previously reported. ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare S3UR to S3/S3U for procedural, in-hospital, and 30-day clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). MethodsPatients enrolled in the STS/ACC TVT (Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry between January 1, 2021, and June 30, 2023, who underwent TAVR with S3UR or S3U/S3 valve platforms were propensity-matched and evaluated for procedural, in-hospital, and 30-day clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. Results10,314 S3UR patients were propensity matched with 10,314 patients among 150,539 S3U/S3 patients. At 30 days, there were no statistically significant differences in death, stroke, or bleeding, but a numerically higher hospital readmission rate in the S3UR cohort (8.5% vs 7.7%; P = 0.04). At discharge, S3UR patients exhibited significantly lower mean gradients (9.2 ± 4.6 mm Hg vs 12.0 ± 5.7 mm Hg; P < 0.0001) and larger aortic valve area (2.1 ± 0.7 cm2 vs 1.9 ± 0.6 cm2; P < 0.0001) than patients treated with S3/S3U. The 29-mm valve size exhibited significant reduction in mild PVL (5.3% vs 9.4%; P < 0.0001). ConclusionsS3UR TAVR is associated with lower mean gradients and lower rates of PVL than earlier generations of balloon expandable transcatheter heart valve platforms.

Long-term bio-functional performance of a novel, self-positioning balloon expandable transcatheter biological aortic valve system in the ovine aortic banding model.

The aim of the study was to evaluate bio-functionality of a novel, proprietary balloon-expandable biological transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) system (InFlow, CardValve Consortium, Poland) in an ovine model of aortic banding. Surgical ascending aorta banding was created in 21 sheep. Two weeks later, 18 biological valves were implanted within the model using 15-16 F InFlow TAVI systems and carotid cut-down approach. Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography was performed at 30, 90, and 180-day. At designated time, animals were euthanized and valves harvested for analysis. All sheep survived the banding procedure. There were 4 (22%) procedure related deaths within a 7-day period. During the observation an additional 2 sheep died. In one, the valve dislocated after the procedure - the animal was excluded. Two animals completed 30-day follow up, five 90-day follow-up and four terminal follow-up of 180 days. Valves examined via transesophageal echocardiography showed proper hemodynamic parameters without evidence of structural valve deterioration. The maximum and average flow gradients at 180 days were 31.4 (23.3-37.7) and 17.5 (13.1-20.2) mmHg, respectively. There was one case of moderate insufficiency and no case of perivalvular leaks. By histopathology, there were no inflammation, thrombosis, nor calcifications in any tested valves at long-term follow-up. Neointimal coverage of stent struts increased with time from basal part in "early" groups to nearly 3/4 of stent length in the 180-day group. The pannus tissue showed maturation that increased with time with no stenotic "collar" visible in orthotopically implanted valves. The study showed good hemodynamic performance, durability and biocompatibility of the novel biological THV.

Midterm results after aortic valve neocuspidization

ObjectivesAortic valve neocuspidization with autologous pericardium is gaining increasing attention as a surgical treatment option for aortic valve disease. However, little is known about midterm durability and valve-related events. MethodsPatients undergoing aortic valve neocuspidization between 2016 and 2021 were included. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before the operation, at discharge, and annually thereafter. Data were analyzed for incidences of structural valve deterioration, bioprosthetic valve failure, survival, freedom from reoperation, and hemodynamic performance. ResultsA total of 162 patients underwent aortic valve neocuspidization (mean age, 52.6 ± 16.6 years; range, 13-78 years); 114 (70.4%) were male. A total of 132 patients presented with a bicuspid aortic valve (81.5%) and 126 patients presented with aortic valve stenosis (77.8%). Concomitant procedures were performed in 63 patients (38.9%). Mean follow-up was 3.5 ± 1.2 years. At discharge, peak and mean pressure gradients were 15.6 ± 7.2 mm Hg and 8.4 ± 3.7 mm Hg, respectively, with a mean effective orifice area of 2.4 ± 0.8 cm2. After 5 years, peak and mean pressure gradients were 14.5 ± 4.6 mm Hg and 7.5 ± 2.2 mm Hg, respectively, with a mean effective orifice area of 2.3 ± 0.8 cm2. At 5 years, cumulative incidences of moderate and severe structural valve deterioration and bioprosthetic valve failure were 9.82% ± 3.87%, 6.96% ± 3.71%, and 12.1% ± 4.12%, respectively. Survival was 97.3% ± 1.4%, and freedom from reoperation was 91.3% ± 2.4%. ConclusionsAortic valve neocuspidization accomplishes low pressure gradients early after initial surgery and during follow-up. Survival in this young patient population is excellent. The main reason for reoperation is endocarditis, and rates for structural valve degeneration are low.

Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: From Pre-Procedural Planning to Procedural Scenarios and Possible Complications.

Over the last decades, bioprosthetic heart valves (BHV) have been increasingly implanted instead of mechanical valves in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Structural valve deterioration (SVD) is a common issue at follow-up and can justify the need for a reintervention. In the evolving landscape of interventional cardiology, valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV TAVR) has emerged as a remarkable innovation to address the complex challenges of patients previously treated with SAVR and has rapidly gained prominence as a feasible technique especially in patients at high surgical risk. On the other hand, the expanding indications for TAVR in progressively younger patients with severe aortic stenosis pose the crucial question on the long-term durability of transcatheter heart valves (THVs), as patients might outlive the bioprosthetic valve. In this review, we provide an overview on the role of ViV TAVR for failed surgical and transcatheter BHVs, with a specific focus on current clinical evidence, pre-procedural planning, procedural techniques, and possible complications. The combination of integrated Heart Team discussion with interventional growth curve makes it possible to achieve best ViV TAVR results and avoid complications or put oneself ahead of time from them.

Five-year outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement with a novel bovine pericardial bioprosthesis.

The short-term performance of the Cingular bovine pericardial aortic valve was proven. This study evaluated its 5-year safety and haemodynamic outcomes. It enrolled 148 patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement with the Cingular bovine pericardial aortic valve between March 2016 and October 2017 in 5 clinical centres in China. Safety and haemodynamic outcomes were followed up to 5 years. The incidence of all-cause mortality, structural valve deterioration and reintervention was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The mean age of patients was 67.7 [standard deviation (SD) 5.1] years, and 36.5% of patients were female. The mean follow-up was 5.3 (SD 1.2) years. Five-year freedom from all-cause mortality, structural valve deterioration and all-cause reintervention were 91.2%, 100% and 99.3%, respectively. At 5 years, the mean gradient and effective orifice area of all sizes combined were 14.0 (SD 5.5) mmHg and 1.9 (SD 0.3) cm2, respectively. For 19- and 21-mm sizes of aortic prostheses, the mean gradients and effective orifice area at 5 years were 17.5 (SD 7.0) mmHg and 1.6 (SD 0.2) cm2 and 13.7 (SD 6.7) mmHg and 1.8 (SD 0.3) cm2, respectively. The incidence of moderate or severe patient-prosthesis mismatch was 4.1% and 0.0% patients at 5 years, respectively. The 5-year safety and haemodynamic outcomes of Cingular bovine pericardial aortic valve are encouraging. Longer-term follow-up is warranted to assess its true durability.

Impact of transcatheter heart valve type on outcomes of surgical explantation after failed transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the EXPLANT-TAVR international registry.

There are limited data on the impact of transcatheter heart valve (THV) type on the outcomes of surgical explantation after THV failure. We sought to determine the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) explantation for failed balloon-expandable valves (BEV) versus self-expanding valves (SEV). From November 2009 to February 2022, 401 patients across 42 centres in the EXPLANT-TAVR registry underwent TAVR explantation during a separate admission from the initial TAVR. Mechanically expandable valves (N=10, 2.5%) were excluded. The outcomes of TAVR explantation were compared for 202 (51.7%) failed BEV and 189 (48.3%) failed SEV. Among 391 patients analysed (mean age: 73.0±9.8 years; 33.8% female), the median time from index TAVR to TAVR explantation was 13.3 months (interquartile range 5.1-34.8), with no differences between groups. Indications for TAVR explantation included endocarditis (36.0% failed SEV vs 55.4% failed BEV; p<0.001), paravalvular leak (21.2% vs 11.9%; p=0.014), structural valve deterioration (30.2% vs 21.8%; p=0.065) and prosthesis-patient mismatch (8.5% vs 10.4%; p=0.61). The SEV group trended fewer urgent/emergency surgeries (52.0% vs 62.3%; p=0.057) and more root replacement (15.3% vs 7.4%; p=0.016). Concomitant cardiac procedures were performed in 57.8% of patients, including coronary artery bypass graft (24.8%), and mitral (38.9%) and tricuspid (14.6%) valve surgery, with no differences between groups. In-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality and stroke rates were similar between groups (allp>0.05), with no differences in cumulative mortality at 3 years (log-rank p=0.95). On multivariable analysis, concomitant mitral surgery was an independent predictor of 1-year mortality after BEV explant (hazard ratio [HR] 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-3.72) and SEV explant (HR 2.00, 95% CI: 1.08-3.69). In the EXPLANT-TAVR global registry, BEV and SEV groups had different indications for surgical explantation, with more root replacements in SEV failure, but no differences in midterm mortality and morbidities. Further refinement of TAVR explantation techniques are important to improving outcomes.

In vivo application of a glutaraldehyde-free, UVA/riboflavin cross-linked bovine pericardium confirms suitability for cardiovascular substitutes

Glutaraldehyde (GA)-treated bovine pericardium is still the gold standard for the fabrication of bioprostheses needed for the surgical treatment of valvular malfunction. Although excellent stability and low immunogenicity are accomplished, the application of GA is considered to be causal for structural valve deterioration, diminishing the long-term durability of bioprosthetic tissue. The novel GA-free SULEEI-treatment of bovine pericardium combines decellularization, riboflavin/UVA-cross-linking, and low-energy electron beam irradiation. In the present study, we initiated an in vivo application. We used a subcutaneous rat model to compare the immune and tissue responses, calcification propensity, and biomechanical properties of the alternatively prepared SULEEI bovine pericardial tissue with standard glutaraldehyde-fixed and industrially produced bovine pericardial patch material. SULEEI pericardium evokes a similar immune reaction and tissue response as the control standard bovine patch material. The calcification propensity of SULEEI tissue was low, and biomechanical analysis revealed a heterogeneous but similar pattern in tissue stiffness compared to the control patch. The results of this study highlight the potential of SULEEI-treated bovine pericardial tissue as a candidate for cutting-edge cardiovascular and valvular biomaterials in reconstructive surgery.

Long-Term Results After Aortic Valve Replacement with Last-Generation Stentless Prostheses.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and hemodynamic results in patients affected by severe aortic valve disease after aortic valve replacement with third-generation stentless aortic prostheses (3F® stentless equine pericardial [Medtronic plc, Minneapolis Minnesota] and Pericarbon Freedom™ stentless bovine pericardial [LivaNova plc, London, United Kingdom]) and to analyze the benefits and the drawbacks associated to their use. Between June, 2003 and Sept, 2015 a cohort of 548 consecutive patients affected by aortic valve disease received an aortic valve replacement using a last-generation stentless pericardial aortic prosthesis at our unit. Respectively, 322 patients received a Pericarbon Freedom™ and 226 received a 3F® aortic valve. Size ranged between 19 and 29, with prevalence of 23 and 25 devices. Mean age at operation was 71± 11 years, 57% of patients were males, the mean logistic EuroScore was 8.9 ± 7.2 and 44.2% received concomitant procedures. The mean extracorporeal circulation (ECC) time was 119.2 ± 40.6. The mean cross clamp time was 90.5' ± 21.4'. In 30 patients, the aortic prosthesis was included in a Dacron tube straight graft for a Bentall operation. Early/in-hospital mortality was 2.55% (14 cases) for the entire cohort. In patients receiving isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR), it was 0.91% (5 cases). Follow up ranged between six months and 12 years (median follow-up time: 6.77 years). During follow up, 137 patients died of all causes (25%), of whom 32 patients died of cardiac causes (5.8%). Cardiac survival probability was 91% at 12 years. All surviving patients were in NYHA class I at last follow up. Actuarial freedom from structural valve deterioration was 86% at 12 years. Freedom from endocarditis was 95% at 12 years. Freedom from a valve-related reoperation at 12 years follow up was 95%. Mean residual transprosthetic gradient at 12 years was 10.3 ± 4.8MmHg. Last-generation stentless pericardial valves offer excellent hemodynamics and adequate durability and freedom from structural deterioration at 12 years follow up. The implantation technique of a stentless valve is a little more demanding when compared to a stented valve, but it can be easily reproduced after minimal training. Incidence of endocarditis and thromboembolic events is low and comparable to stented pericardial valves. Young and active patients, and patients with large BSA where a patient-prosthesis mismatch may be anticipated are, in our opinion, ideal candidates to receive these kinds of valves.

Leaflet Mechanical Stress in Different Designs and Generations of Transcatheter Aortic Valves: An in Vitro Study

BackgroundIt is unknown whether bioprostheses used for transcatheter aortic valve implantation will have similar long-term durability as those used for surgical aortic valve replacement. Repetitive mechanical stress applied to the valve leaflets, particularly during diastole, is the main determinant of structural valve deterioration. Leaflet mechanical stress cannot be measured in vivo. The objective of this in vitro/in silico study was thus to compare the magnitude and regional distribution of leaflet mechanical stress in old vs new generations of self-expanding (SE) vs balloon expandable (BE) transcatheter heart valves (THVs). MethodsA double activation simulator was used for in vitro testing of two generations of SE THV (Medtronic CoreValve 26 mm and EVOLUT PRO 26 mm) and two generations of BE THV (Edwards SAPIEN 23 mm vs SAPIEN-3 23 mm). These THVs were implanted within a 21-mm aortic annulus. A noncontact system based on stereophotogammetry and digital image correlation with high spatial and temporal resolution (2000 img/sec) was used to visualize the valve leaflet motion and perform the three-dimensional analysis. A finite element model of the valve was developed, and the leaflet deformation obtained from the digital image correlation analysis was applied to the finite element model to calculate local leaflet mechanical stress during diastole. ResultsThe maximum von Mises leaflet stress was higher in early vs new THV generation (p < 0.05) and in BE vs SE THV (p < 0.05): early generation BE: 2.48 vs SE: 1.40 MPa; new generation BE: 1.68 vs SE: 1.07 MPa. For both types of THV, the highest values of leaflet stress were primarily observed in the upper leaflet edge near the commissures and to a lesser extent in the mid-portion of the leaflet body, which is the area where structural leaflet deterioration most often occurs in vivo. ConclusionsThe results of this in vitro/in silico study suggest that: i) Newer generations of THVs have ∼30% lower leaflet mechanical stress than the early generations; ii) For a given generation, SE THVs have lower leaflet mechanical stress than BE THVs. Further studies are needed to determine if these differences between new vs early THV generations and between SE vs BE THVs will translate into significant differences in long-term valve durability in vivo.

Clinical Outcomes After Mitral Valve Replacement With Epic and Mosaic Bioprosthetic Valves

BackgroundComparative studies of outcomes between different biological mitral valve prostheses are scarce. This study compares the late clinical results of valve replacement with the Epic and Mosaic bioprostheses. MethodsPatients undergoing isolated elective mitral valve replacement (MVR) between 2005 and 2019 were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcomes were freedom from mitral valve reintervention and overall survival. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and competing risk analyses were performed. ResultsMVR was performed in 247 (73.7%) patients with the Epic prosthesis and in 88 (26.3%) patients with the Mosaic prosthesis. The median follow-up was 3 (interquartile range, 0.20-5.64) years. At 10 years after surgery, the estimated survival rates were 86.1% (95% CI, 80.5%-91.9%) and 73.5% (95% CI, 60.6%-89.3%) for the Epic and Mosaic groups, respectively (P = .40). On inverse probability of treatment weighted analysis, no significant intergroup difference was found (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.54-2.66; P = .70]. At 10 years, the cumulative incidence functions of mitral valve reintervention with death as competing risk were 34.4% (95% CI, 32.7%-36.1%) and 17.6% (95% CI, 16.2%-18.9%) for the Epic and Mosaic groups, respectively. On multivariable Fine-Gray analysis, the type of implanted mitral valve prosthesis just failed to reach a statistically significant difference in mitral valve reintervention (hazard ratio, 0.43 for Mosaic valve; 95% CI, 0.18-1.06; P = .067). Structural valve deterioration was an uncommon indication for reintervention in the first 10 years after surgery. ConclusionsClinical results of MVR with the Epic or Mosaic prosthesis are satisfactory. Our results suggest that the Mosaic bioprosthesis might offer better freedom from reintervention.