Structural Valve Degeneration Research Articles

Long-Term Outcomes of Bioprosthetic Valves in the Mitral Position: A Pooled Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Individual Patient Data

ObjectivesBioprosthetic MVR use is on the rise, but data regarding long term durability is lacking. We sought to perform a reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis from published Kaplan Meier curves to ascertain survival, freedom from valve degeneration and reoperation in studies published since 2010. We explored the effects of age and valve type (bovine pericardial or porcine valve) on outcomes. MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, OVID, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies reporting at least 3 years of follow-up after bMVR and published since 2010. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess methodological quality. Kaplan Meier curves were digitized to extract individual patient data and reconstructed estimates for overall survival, freedom from SVD and freedom from re-operation. Results20 studies (16465 patients) were included. 9 studies reported on porcine valves, 6 on bovine and 7 did not specify the valve type. Overall survival after bMVR at 15 years was 40% (CI 38%-42%), freedom from re-operation at 15 years was 79% (CI 76%-82%) and freedom from structural valve degeneration at 15 years was 64% (58%-70%). Freedom from SVD was improved in the 70+ age group (93% up to 25 years, HR 6.6(2.5-17) for 18-59 VS >70, p<0.0001). There was no difference in valve durability or survival between bovine pericardial or porcine valves. ConclusionIn this meta-analysis patients of receiving bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement using newer generation valves, the inverse relationship between age and SVD was re-iterated in the 70+ age group. Prosthesis type made no difference in outcomes.

Calcification of surgical aortic bioprostheses and its impact on clinical outcome.

Aortic valve calcification (AVC) of surgical valve bioprostheses (BP) has been poorly explored. We aimed to evaluate in-vivo and ex-vivo BP AVC and its prognosis value. Between 2011 and 2019, AVC was assessed using in-vivo computed tomography (CT) in 361 patients who had undergone surgical valve replacement 6.4±4.3 years earlier. Ex-vivo CT scans were performed for 37 explanted BP. The in-vivo CT scans were interpretable for 342 patients (19 patients [5.2%], were excluded). These patients were 77.2±9.1 years old and 64.3% were male. Mean in-vivo AVC was 307±500 Agatston unit (AU). The AVC was 562±570 AU for the 183 (53.5%) patients with structural valve degeneration (SVD) and 13±43 AU for those without SVD (p<0.0001). In-vivo and ex-vivo AVC were strongly correlated (r=0.88, p<0.0001). An in-vivo AVC>100 AU (n=147, 43%) had a specificity of 96% for diagnosing Stage 2-3 SVD (area under the curve=0.92). Patients with AVC>100 AU had a worse outcome compared with those with AVC≤100 AU (n=195). In multivariable analysis, AVC was a predictor of overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR] and 95% confidence interval=1.16[1.04-1.29]; p=0.006), cardiovascular mortality (HR=1.22[1.04-1.43]; p=0.013), cardiovascular events (HR=1.28 [1.16-1.41]; p<0.0001), and re-intervention (HR=1.15 [1.06-1.25]; p<0.0001). After adjustment for Stage 2-3 SVD diagnosis, AVC remained a predictor of overall mortality (HR=1.20 [1.04-1.39]; p=0.015) and cardiovascular events (HR=1.25 [1.09-1.43]; p=0.001). CT scan is a reliable tool to assess BP leaflet calcification. An AVC>100 AU is tightly associated with SVD and it is a strong predictor of overall mortality and cardiovascular events.

Perceval-S over time. Clinical outcomes after ten years of usage

BackgroundPerceval-S has become a reliable and commonly used option in surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) since its first implantation in humans 15 years ago. Despite the fact that this aortic valve has been proven efficient enough in the short and mid-term period, there is still lack of evidence for the long-term outcomes.Materials and methodsThis is an observational retrospective study in a high-volume cardiovascular center. Pertinent data were collected for all the patients in whom Perceval-S was implanted from 2013 to 2020.ResultsThe total number of patients was 205 with a mean age 76.4 years. Mean survival time was 5.5 years (SE = 0.26). The overall survival probability of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with Perceval-S at 6 months was 91.0% (Standard Error SE = 2.0%), at one year 88.4% (SE = 2.3%) and at 5-years 64.8% (SE = 4.4%). A detrimental cardiac event leading to death was the probable cause of death in 35 patients (55.6%). The initiation of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) program in our center in 2017 was associated with a decline in the number of very high-risk patients treated with sutureless bioprosthesis. This fact is demonstrated by the significant shift towards lower surgical risk cases, as median Euroscore II was reduced from 5,550 in 2016 to 3,390 in 2020. Mini sternotomy was implemented in 79,5% of cases favoring less invasive approach. Low incidence of reinterventions, patient prosthesis mismatch and structural valve degeneration was detected.ConclusionsThe survival rate after aortic valve replacement with implantation of Perceval-S is satisfactory in the long-term follow-up. Cases of bioprosthesis dysfunction were limited. Mini sternotomy was used in the majority of cases. TAVR initiation program impacted on the proportion of patients treated with Perceval-S with reduction of high-risk patients submitted to surgery.

Original Article--Mid-term Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes in Middle Age Patients Post Trifecta™ (Abbott) Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single-center Study.

Trifecta™ is an externally wrapped bovine pericardial aortic valve with a favorable hemodynamic performance and acceptable rate of freedom from structural valve degeneration. However, recent reports of early Trifecta valve failure question its durability. Rheumatic valve disease in young population is predominant, there is no data on the Trifecta performance, durability or safety available worldwide over the middle age population, as well as there are no previous similar reports from Middle East region. We report on mid-term clinical and hemodynamic performance of Trifecta valve in middle age population with small aortic annuls, a single center report. A retrospective study of all patients who underwent Trifecta™ SAVR between June 2014 and December 2019 at a cardiac center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Hemodynamic performance was analyzed by longitudinal Doppler echocardiography. During a 5.5-year period, a total of 24 patients underwent SAVR with Trifecta™ valves at our heart center. Patients had a median age of 47.1 years (IQR = 37) and male:female ratio of 1:1. Patients had a median EuroScoreII of 2 (IQR = 1). The 19 mm valve was the most frequently used (29.2%) followed by the 21 mm and 23 mm (both 25.0%). Concomitant procedure was (54.2%). All patients survived their operations and most (87.0%) had their symptoms relieved. A 30-day mortality rate of 4.2%. Patients were followed up for a median of 58.5 months (IQR = 38), during which 8.3% required re interventions, giving an overall freedom from re-intervention of 91.7%. The re-intervention after valve implantation was recorded in two (8.3%). These re-interventions were performed 3 years post initial surgery and were due to structural valve deterioration (SVD). The mean gradient reduced significantly from 43.6 ± 23.9 mmHg (median = 41, IQR = 21) at baseline to 13.0 ± 7.4 mmHg (median = 11, IQR = 5) one-week post intervention (p < 0.001). The average mean gradients were stable from post-operation to follow-up (13.0 ± 7.4 vs 14.1 ± 6.4 mmHg). Our study confirms excellent mid-term durability, clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Trifecta™ valve in middle age population, despite the fact of non-statically significant trend-up of transvalvular gradient over the follow up period. Further long-term studies with larger sample-size are warranted to confirm these results.

Midterm results after aortic valve neocuspidization

ObjectivesAortic valve neocuspidization with autologous pericardium is gaining increasing attention as a surgical treatment option for aortic valve disease. However, little is known about midterm durability and valve-related events. MethodsPatients undergoing aortic valve neocuspidization between 2016 and 2021 were included. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before the operation, at discharge, and annually thereafter. Data were analyzed for incidences of structural valve deterioration, bioprosthetic valve failure, survival, freedom from reoperation, and hemodynamic performance. ResultsA total of 162 patients underwent aortic valve neocuspidization (mean age, 52.6 ± 16.6 years; range, 13-78 years); 114 (70.4%) were male. A total of 132 patients presented with a bicuspid aortic valve (81.5%) and 126 patients presented with aortic valve stenosis (77.8%). Concomitant procedures were performed in 63 patients (38.9%). Mean follow-up was 3.5 ± 1.2 years. At discharge, peak and mean pressure gradients were 15.6 ± 7.2 mm Hg and 8.4 ± 3.7 mm Hg, respectively, with a mean effective orifice area of 2.4 ± 0.8 cm2. After 5 years, peak and mean pressure gradients were 14.5 ± 4.6 mm Hg and 7.5 ± 2.2 mm Hg, respectively, with a mean effective orifice area of 2.3 ± 0.8 cm2. At 5 years, cumulative incidences of moderate and severe structural valve deterioration and bioprosthetic valve failure were 9.82% ± 3.87%, 6.96% ± 3.71%, and 12.1% ± 4.12%, respectively. Survival was 97.3% ± 1.4%, and freedom from reoperation was 91.3% ± 2.4%. ConclusionsAortic valve neocuspidization accomplishes low pressure gradients early after initial surgery and during follow-up. Survival in this young patient population is excellent. The main reason for reoperation is endocarditis, and rates for structural valve degeneration are low.

Recent Advances in the Modification and Improvement of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves.

Valvular heart disease (VHD) has become a burden and a growing public health problem in humans, causing significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. An increasing number of patients with severe VHD need to undergo heart valve replacement surgery, and artificial heart valves are in high demand. However, allogeneic valves from donors are lacking and cannot meet clinical practice needs. A mechanical heart valve can activate the coagulation pathway after contact with blood after implantation in the cardiovascular system, leading to thrombosis. Therefore, bioprosthetic heart valves (BHVs) are still a promising way to solve this problem. However, there are still challenges in the use of BHVs. For example, their longevity is still unsatisfactory due to the defects, such as thrombosis, structural valve degeneration, calcification, insufficient re-endothelialization, and the inflammatory response. Therefore, strategies and methods are needed to effectively improve the biocompatibility and longevity of BHVs. This review describes the recent research advances in BHVs and strategies to improve their biocompatibility andlongevity.

Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Structural valve degeneration is increasingly seen given the higher rates of bioprosthetic heart valve use for surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Valve-in-valve TAVR (VIV-TAVR) is an attractive alternate for patients who are otherwise at high risk for reoperative surgery. We compared patients who underwent VIV-TAVR and native valve TAVR through a retrospective analysis of our institutional transcatheter valve therapy from 2013 to 2022. Patients who underwent either a native valve TAVR or VIV-TAVR were included. VIV-TAVR was defined as TAVR in patients who underwent a previous surgical aortic valve replacement. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to obtain survival estimates. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for the multivariable analysis of mortality. A total of 3,532 patients underwent TAVR, of whom 198 (5.6%) underwent VIV-TAVR. Patients in the VIV-TAVR cohort were younger than patients who underwent native valve TAVR (79.5 vs 84years, p <0.001), with comparable number of women and a higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score (6.28 vs 4.46, p <0.001). The VIV-TAVR cohort had a higher incidence of major vascular complications (2.5% vs 0.8%, p = 0.008) but lower incidence of permanent pacemaker placement (2.5% vs 8.1%, p = 0.004). The incidence of stroke was comparable between the groups (VIV-TAVR 2.5% vs native TAVR 2.4%, p = 0.911). The 30-day readmission rates (VIV-TAVR 7.1% vs native TAVR 9%, p = 0.348), in-hospital (VIV-TAVR 2% vs native TAVR 1.4%, p = 0.46), and overall (VIV-TAVR 26.3% vs native TAVR 30.8%, p = 0.18) mortality at a follow-up of 1.8years (0.83 to 3.5) were comparable between the groups. The survival estimates were comparable between the groups (log-rank p = 0.27). On the multivariable cox regression analysis, VIV-TAVR was associated with decreased hazards of death (hazard ratio 0.68 [0.5 to 0.9], p = 0.02). In conclusion, VIV-TAVR is a feasible and safe strategy for high-risk patients with bioprosthetic valve failure. There may be potentially higher short-term morbidity with VIV-TAVR, with no overt impact on survival.

Rates and Predictors of Structural Valve Degeneration and Failure of Trifecta Bioprosthetic Valve Over a 5-year Follow-up Period: A Single-center Experience.

The Trifecta bioprosthetic valve has been commonly used for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Multiple studies have been done to define the rate of structural valve degeneration (SVD) and failure (SVF), but the outcomes are still debatable. Therefore, we aim to conduct this single-center study to estimate the rate and predictors of SVD/SVF. This retrospective observational cohort single-center study was conducted between 2014 and 2019 among Trifecta SAVR patients. Data were patient's characteristics collected from electronic medical records at baseline and follow-up (3-5 years). Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level of P ≤ 0.05. A total of 271 eligible patients were identified. Most of our sample were males (57.9%), with a mean age of 71.1 ± 10.6 years. The mean baseline preoperative ejection fraction (EF) was 53.0%, with no change (P = 0.88) in the immediate postoperative EF (53.6%). A most recent follow-up EF revealed a significant increase of EF (55.2%), P = 0.01. Furthermore, there was a significant increase from peak velocity to PVMRE (mean difference [MD] ± standard error of mean (SEM) [0.15 ± 0.04], P < 0.01), an increase in pressure gradient (PGIPE) to PGMRE (MD ± SEM [1.70 ± 0.49], P < 0.01), and a decrease in Doppler velocity index (DVIIPE) to DVIMRE (MD ± SEM [-0.037 ± 0.01], P = 0.01). Regarding the SVF rate, 13 (4.8%) patients had failed valves requiring replacement throughout the study period. Over a 5-year follow-up period, 4.8% had SVF with an SVD of 23.2%, with the majority of SVD not being clinically significant except in six patients. These results corroborate with a previously published study suggesting a bad clinical outcome of Trifecta valve placement.

Early Outcomes of Pulmonary Valve Replacement With the Edwards Inspiris Resilia Pericardial Bioprosthesis.

Controversy regarding the optimal pulmonary valve substitute remains, with no approved surgical valve for pulmonary valve replacement (PVR). Furthermore, unfavorable anatomy often precludes transcatheter PVR in patients with congenital heart disease. We therefore sought to evaluate the feasibility of the Edwards Inspiris pericardial aortic bioprosthesis in the pulmonary position in pediatric and adult patients requiring PVR. Data from consecutive patients who underwent PVR from February 2019 to February 2021 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative adverse events included paravalvular or transvalvular leak, endocarditis, explant, thromboembolism, valve thrombosis, valve-related bleeding, hemolysis, and structural valve degeneration. Progression of valve gradients was assessed from discharge to 30 days and one year. Of 24 patients with median age of 26 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 17-33; range: 4-60 years), 22 (91.7%) patients had previously undergone tetralogy of Fallot repair and 2 (8.3%) patients had undergone double-outlet right ventricle repair in the neonatal period or infancy. All patients had at least mild right ventricular (RV) dilatation (median RV end-diastolic volume index 161.4, IQR: 152.3-183.5 mL/m2) and at least moderate pulmonary insufficiency (95.8%) or stenosis (8.3%). Median cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 71 (IQR: 63-101) min and 66 (IQR: 60-114) min, respectively. At a median postoperative follow-up of 2.5 years (IQR: 1.4-2.6; range: 1.0-3.0 years), there were no mortalities, valve-related reoperations, or adverse events. Postoperative valve gradients and the severity of pulmonary regurgitation did not change significantly over time. At short-term follow-up, the bioprosthesis in this study demonstrated excellent safety and effectiveness for PVR. Further studies with longer follow-up are warranted.

BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE IMPLANTATION AS TYPE OF TRANSPLANTATION: IMMUNOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF NEW CONCEPT

HighlightsImmune processes and mechanisms underlying bioprosthetic heart valve degeneration and rejection of allografts and xenografts are similar.Manufacturers and surgeons can implement effective approaches to prevent immune rejection in the process of production and implantation of prosthetic heart valves in order to delay the process of structural valve degeneration. AbstractBioprosthetic heart valves (BHV) are characterized by low thrombogenicity, thus circumventing the need for long‐term anticoagulation. However, BHV lifespan is limited to 10–15 years because its tissue components are subject to degeneration. Recent research data indicate that immune responses forming the basis of humoral and cellular rejection of allografts and xenografts play a major role in the development of structural valve degeneration (SVD). This review summarizes up-to-date data on immune processes involved in SVD pathogenesis. Moreover, the latest achievements in the development of strategies to reduce the immunogenicity of BHV, such as data on immune compatibility of allogeneic material and the process of deriving low immunogenic biomaterial from genetically modified animals, decellularization of BHV, and the ways of slowing the process of degeneration are analyzed.

Valved Conduits for Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Reconstruction: A Review of Current Technologies and Future Directions.

The need for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction is common and growing in congenital heart surgery given expanding indications for the repair of congenital as well as acquired heart disease. Various valved conduit options currently exist including homografts, xenograft pulmonary valved conduits (Contegra™), and porcine valved conduits. The major limitation for all conduits is implant durability, which requires reoperation. Currently, cryopreserved homografts are often used given their superiority shown in long-term data. Significant limitations remain in the cost and availability of the graft, particularly for smaller sizes. Contegra conduits are available in a variety of sizes. Nonetheless, the data regarding long-term durability are less robust and studies comparing durability with homografts have been conflicting. Additionally, there is concern for increased rates of late endocarditis in this conduit. Porcine valved conduits offer a reliable option but are limited by structural valve degeneration associated with all types of bioprosthetic heart valve replacements. New developments in the field of tissue engineering have produced promising bio-restorative valved conduits that may overcome many of the limitations of previous conduit technologies. These remain in the early stages of clinical testing. This review summarizes the clinical data surrounding the conduits used most commonly in clinical practice today and explores emerging technologies that may bring us closer to developing the ideal conduit.

Abstract 18522: Pyridoxamine (vitamin B6) Mitigation Of Structural Valve Degeneration Of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves

Introduction: Bioprosthetic heart valves (BHV) fabricated from glutaraldehyde treated bovine pericardium (BP) have limited durability due to structural valve degeneration (SVD) resulting from both calcification and advanced glycation end product (AGE) deposition. Hypothesis: We investigated the hypothesis that PYR modification of BHV leaflets mitigates AGE-serum protein uptake, oxidation, and calcification mechanisms in model studies, both in vitro and in vivo. Methods: To model AGE accumulation in BHV, we used well-established in vitro and in vivo models. AGE and serum albumin (SA) uptake in BP were quantitated per immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining intensity. PYR uptake was quantified using a novel fluorescent assay. BP collagen was examined by second-harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy. Calcification studies investigated the activity of BP alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and BP calcium levels were quantitated using a colorimetric assay. In vivo studies used a juvenile rat subdermal BP implantation model with PYR oral administration or BP-PYR modification. Endpoints were calcification, SA, and AGE accumulation per IHC and ALP activity per enzyme histochemistry. Results: PYR modification of BP resulted in high-affinity binding of PYR with 2.0±0.2 μg/mg of PYR binding to BP that was stable for 28 days in physiological conditions. Modification had an inhibitory effect on SA uptake in vitro with 60±5% (p&lt;0.001) reduction in IHC staining intensity; PYR modification of BP resulted in increased protection from oxidative damage in vitro with collagen structure preservation (by SHG) after ten days, while control tissues were degraded. After 28-day of in vivo subdermal BP implantation in rats, a significant 70±5% (p&lt;0.001) decrease and 80±5% (p&lt;0.001) decrease in SA IHC staining and AGE staining, respectively, as well as ALP activity was documented in BP-PYR. Quantitative analysis of calcium content demonstrated a reduction from 108±5 μg/mg in control to 77±5 μg/mg in BP-PYR explants (p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that PYR mitigates SVD mechanisms in vitro and in vivo, limiting both AGE-serum protein accumulation and calcification with associated inhibition of ALP.

Impact of reintervention after index aortic valve replacement on the risk of subsequent mortality

ObjectivesThe use of bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) is inherently associated with a risk of structural valve degeneration (SVD) and the need for aortic valve (AV) reintervention. We sought to evaluate whether AV reintervention, in the form of repeat surgical AVR (SAVR) or valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV-TAVR), negatively affects patients’ subsequent long-term survival after index SAVR. MethodsWe identified patients who had undergone bioprosthetic SAVR from 2002 to 2017 at our institution. Median longitudinal follow-up after index SAVR was 7.3 years (10.9 years for those with and 7.2 years for those without AV reintervention), and median follow-up after AV reintervention was 1.9 years. Cox regression analyses using AV reintervention (re-SAVR and ViV-TAVR) as a time-varying covariate were used to determine the impact of reintervention on subsequent survival. ResultsOf 4167 patients who underwent index SAVR, 139 (3.3%) required AV reintervention for SVD, with re-SAVR being performed in 65 and ViV-TAVR in 74. Median age at the index SAVR was 73 years (interquartile range, 64-79 years), and 2541 (61%) were male. Overall, there were total of 1171 mortalities observed, of which 13 occurred after re-SAVR and 9 after ViV-TAVR. AV reintervention was associated with a greater risk of subsequent mortality compared with those patients who did not require AV reintervention (hazard ratio, 2.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-3.88, P < .001). This increased risk of subsequent mortality was more pronounced for those who received their index AVR when <65 years of age (hazard ratio, 5.60; 95% confidence interval, 2.57-12.22, P < .001) versus those ≥65 years (2.06, 1.21-3.52, P = .008). Direct comparison of survival between those who underwent re-SAVR versus ViV-TAVR showed 5-year survival to be comparable (re-SAVR: 74% vs ViV-TAVR: 80%, P = .67). ConclusionsAmong patients receiving bioprosthetic AVR, an AV reintervention for SVD is associated with an increased risk of subsequent mortality, regardless of re-SAVR or ViV-TAVR, and this risk is greater among younger patients. These findings should be balanced with individual preferences at index AVR in the context of patients’ lifetime management of aortic stenosis.

Atrioventricular Groove Rupture After Mitral Valve Replacement In A Patient With Atrial Fibrillation Secondary To Rheumatic Cardiopatia: Case Report

Introduction: Atrioventricular sulcus lesion (AVGD) is a catastrophic complication of mitral valve surgeries that occurs in less than 2% of the population, with a mortality of 90%. Left ventricular rupture after mitral valve (MVR) replacement should be diagnosed immediately and repaired without hesitation. There are numerous complications described and known after MVR, such as thromboembolism, structural valve degeneration and endocarditis, paravalvular leakage, conduction irregularities in the pathway and bleeding. Case presentation: We present the case of a female patient with a history of rheumatic heart disease with double mitral injury and atrial fibrillation, in which severe mitral stenosis was documented with ECOTT reflecting thrombi of heterogeneous appearance occupying almost entirely left atrium. Programmed for left auriculotomy, valve replacement and thrombus exceresis, resulting in the procedure lesion of the atrioventricular groove meriting packing of the same and placement of mediastinal probes, with subsequent admission to post-surgical coronary care unit. Conclusions: At present, atrioventricular groove rupture is a rare event with increased mortality, the incidence depends on age and associated risk factors in the patient, In our case, rheumatic heart disease generates arrhythmias as a procoagulant state. Although the rupture can be repaired in a second surgical time, follow-up and post-operative care require comprehensive medical equipment and continuous hemodynamic surveillance.

One-year clinical outcomes following Edwards INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic valve implantation in 487 young patients with severe aortic stenosis: a single-center experience.

The use of an aortic bioprosthesis is on the rise in younger patients with severe aortic stenosis despite the risk of accelerated structural valve degeneration (SVD). In the search for an optimal valve substitute that would not be prone to SVD, the INSPIRIS bioprosthesis represents a promising solution to lowering the risk of SVD. Here, we report the 1-year outcomes of the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic bioprosthesis in a population of young patients who underwent aortic valve replacement. In this prospective single-center study, we included all consecutive patients receiving INSPIRIS RESILIA bioprosthesis between June 2017 and July 2021. Patients with isolated severe aortic regurgitation were excluded. Clinical assessment and transthoracic echocardiography were performed preoperatively and at 1 year post-operatively. The primary outcome was overall mortality at one year. A total of 487 patients were included. The mean age was 58.2 ± 11.5 years, 75.2% were men. Most of the interventions were elective, with a mean EuroSCORE II of 4.8 ± 7.9. The valve annulus size in most cases was either 23 mm or 25 mm. Overall mortality at 1-year was 4.1%. At 1-year, 7 patients (1.4%) had a stroke, 4 patients (0.8%) had a myocardial infarction, and 20 patients (4.1%) were hospitalized for congestive heart failure. The Kaplan-Meier estimated survival rates and survival without major adverse cardiac events at 1-year were 96.4% and 96.7%, respectively. At 1-year follow-up, 10 patients (2.1%) had endocarditis and 1 patient (0.2%) had partial prosthetic thrombosis. Pacemaker implantation at 1-year post-operative was necessary in 27 patients (5.5%). Severe patient prosthesis mismatch and severe intra valvular regurgitation were 1.2% and 0.6%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimated survival rates at 1-year of no infective endocarditis preoperative and infective endocarditis preoperative were 97.9 ± 0.7% and 89.5 ± 3.3%, respectively (P < 0.001). Excluding endocarditis-related complication, no structural valve deterioration and no valve failure requiring redo surgery were reported. This is the largest single-center descriptive study of the 1-year outcomes after INSPIRIS RESILIA bioprosthesis implantation. The EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA bioprosthesis provides encouraging clinical outcomes with an excellent 1- year survival rates and good hemodynamic performance. Long-term studies are mandatory to assess valve durability.

Midterm Results of an Algorithmic 3-Pronged Approach to Bicuspid Aortic Valve Repair

BackgroundThis study evaluated midterm outcomes of a 3-pronged algorithm for bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair. Valve-sparing root reimplantation (VSRR) was performed for patients with aortic root dilatation. In those without a root aneurysm, external subannular ring (ESAR) was performed for annuli ≥28 mm and subcommissural annuloplasty (SCA) for annuli <28 mm. MethodsThis was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 242 patients undergoing primary BAV repair from April 29, 2004, to March 1, 2023, at a single institution. Primary end points were mortality, structural valve degeneration (SVD), which was defined as a composite of more than moderate aortic insufficiency or severe aortic stenosis, and reintervention. ResultsThe algorithm was used to treat 201 patients; of these, 130 underwent VSRR, 35 had ESAR, and 36 underwent SCA. Most were men with mean age of 43.8 years (SD, 12.0 years), which was similar between groups. Preoperative aortic insufficiency more than moderate was more common for ESAR compared with VSRR and SCA (74.3% vs 37.7% vs 44.4%, P < .001). At 30 days, mortality was 0.8% (n = 1) for VSRR and 0% for ESAR and SCA. At 6 years, overall Kaplan-Meier survival was 98.9% (95% CI, 97.3%-100%), with no differences between groups (P = .5). The cumulative incidence of SVD was 4.7% (95% CI, 0.1%-9.2%) for VSRR, 6.4% (95% CI, 0%-14.6%) for ESAR, and 0% for SCA (P = .4). Similarly, the cumulative incidence of reintervention with all-cause mortality as a competing risk was 2.2% (95% CI, 0.4%-6.9%), 6.1% (95% CI, 1%-17.9%), and 0% for VSRR, ESAR, and SCA, respectively (P = .506). ConclusionsA 3-pronged algorithmic approach to BAV repair results in excellent survival and freedom from reoperation at 6 years.

Addressing Structural Valve Degeneration and Need for Reoperation, the Achilles Heel of Bioprosthetic Mitral and Aortic Valves

Addressing Structural Valve Degeneration and Need for Reoperation, the Achilles Heel of Bioprosthetic Mitral and Aortic Valves

Echocardiographic Versus Invasive Aortic Valve Gradients in Different Clinical Scenarios

The role of echocardiography in deriving transvalvular mean gradients from transaortic velocities in aortic stenosis (AS) and in structural valve degeneration (SVD) is well established. However, reports following surgical aortic valve replacement, post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and valve-in-valve-TAVR (ViV-TAVR) have cautioned against the use of echocardiography-derived mean gradients to assess normal functioning bioprosthesis due to discrepancy compared with invasive measures in a phenomenon called discordance. In a multicenter study, intraprocedural echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients in AS, SVD, post-native TAVR, and post-ViV-TAVR were compared, when obtained concomitantly, and discharge echocardiographic gradients were recorded. Absolute discordance (intraprocedural echocardiographic - invasive mean gradient) and percent discordance (intraprocedural echocardiographic - invasive mean gradient/echocardiographic mean gradient) were calculated. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine variables independently associated with elevated postprocedure invasive gradients ≥20mm Hg, absolute discordance >10mm Hg, and discharge echocardiographic mean gradient ≥20mm Hg. A total of 5,027 patients were included in the registry: 4,725 native TAVR and 302 ViV-TAVR. Intraprocedural concomitant echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients were obtained pre-TAVR in AS (n=2,418), pre-ViV-TAVR in SVD (n=101), in post-ViV-TAVR (n= 77), and in post-TAVR (n= 823). Echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients demonstrated strong correlation (r=0.69) and agreement (bias, 0.11; 95% CI, -0.4-0.62) in AS, moderate correlation (r=0.56) and agreement (bias, 1.08; 95% CI, -2.53 to 4.59) in SVD, moderate correlation (r=0.61) and weak agreement (bias, 6.47; 95% CI, 5.08-7.85) post-ViV-TAVR, and weak correlation (r=0.18) and agreement (bias, 3.41; 95% CI, 3.16-3.65) post-TAVR. Absolute discordance occurs primarily in ViV-TVR and is not explained by sinotubular junction size and increases with increasing echocardiographic mean gradient. Percent discordance in AS and SVD (1.3% and 4%, respectively) was lower compared with post-TAVR/ViV-TAVR (66.7% and 100%, respectively). Compared with self-expanding valves, balloon expanding valves were independently associated with elevated discharge echocardiographic but lower invasive mean gradient (odds ratio=3.411, 95% CI, 1.482-7.852, P=.004; vs odds ratio=0.308, 95% CI, 0.130-0.731, P=.008, respectively). Post-TAVR/ViV-TAVR, echocardiography is discordant from invasive mean gradients, and absolute discordance increases with increasing echocardiographic mean gradient and is not explained by sinotubular junction size. Percent discordance is significantly higher post-TAVR/ViV-TAVR than in AS and SVD. Post-TAVR/ViV-TAVR, poor correlation and wide limits of agreement suggest echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients may not be used interchangeably and a high residual echocardiographic mean gradient should be confirmed invasively before considering any additional procedure to "correct" the gradient. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement valve types have variable impact on echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients.

Aortic valve replacement after previous TAVI

Endovascular surgery for aortic valve defects has proven itself well in elderly patients with severe comorbidities competing with the underlying disease. However, the risk of dysfunction resulting from structural degeneration of bioprosthetic heart valve and prosthetic valve endocarditis remains high. Repeated surgeries are associated with complications, but open surgery is the only method of treatment in this group of patients.Objective: to describe a series of reinterventions for prosthetic valve dysfunction occurring after TAVI.Material and methods. From 2015 to 2022, at the Department of Emergency Surgery for Acquired Heart Diseases (Head, Professor R.M. Muratov), Bakulev Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, 6 reoperations were performed in patients who had previously undergone transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The average age of patients at the time of TAVI and at the time of reoperation was 70.6 years (62–83) and 74.3 years (70–84), respectively. The EuroSCORE II predicted risk of mortality at the time of reintervention was 42.2% (21.7–87.6). The mean time to reoperation was 42 months. Indications for reoperation were early active prosthetic endocarditis (4 cases) and structural valve degeneration (2 cases).Results. At the hospital stage, 1 patient died of acute heart failure; the operation was performed for vital indications in conditions of extreme initial severity. In three patients, the early postoperative period was uneventful. One patient required intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) due to heart failure, and 1 patient was implanted with permanent pacemaker. The average time of hospitalization was 14 days. Patients with active prosthetic endocarditis received a 6-week course of antibiotic therapy. The function of the implanted valves was satisfactory.Conclusions. Aortic valve replacement after previous TAVI is an emergency operation and represents the only way to treat valve dysfunction. Under active prosthetic endocarditis, timely surgery can save this patient cohort.

The Use of the Cryopreserved Aortic Homograft for Aortic Valve Replacement: Is It Still an Option?

The indications for cryopreserved allografts in aortic valve replacement are still debatable. We aim to identify factors influencing early and long-term durability of the aortic homograft and to define subgroups of patients with an improved long-term quality of life, survival, and freedom from structural valve degeneration (SVD). We evaluated our series of 210 patients who underwent allograft implantation with a retrospective cohort study design over a period of 20 years. Endpoints were overall mortality, cardiac mortality related to SVD, the incidence of SVD, reoperation, and a composite endpoint comprising major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), which includes cardiac death both related and not related to SVD, subsequent aortic valve surgery, new or recurrent infection of implanted allograft, recurrent aortic regurgitation, rehospitalization for heart failure, an increase in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class of ≥1, or cerebrovascular events. The primary indication for surgery was endocarditis (48%), which was also a predisposing factor for increased cardiac mortality. Overall mortality was 32.4% with a 27% incidence of SVD and mortality associated with SVD of 13.8%. Reoperation occurred in 33.8% and MACCEs in 54.8%. Long-term NYHA functional class and echocardiographic parameters improved over time. Statistical analysis demonstrated that root replacement technique and adult age were protective factors for SVD. We found no statistically significant difference in the clinical outcomes analyzed between women of childbearing age who had children after surgery and the rest of the women. The cryopreserved allograft is still a valid option in aortic valve replacement, providing acceptable durability and clinical outcomes with optimal hemodynamic performance. SVD is influenced by the implantation technique. Women of childbearing age might have additional benefits from this procedure.