Stroke Severity Scale Research Articles

Values of LncRNA SNHG14 in the Differential Diagnosis and Prognosis Evaluation of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

The long non-coding RNA (LncRNA) SNHG14 has been investigated for its potential in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) diagnosis. Thirty-two healthy people, 85 patients with AIS, and 40 patients with TIA had their blood tested to determine SNHG14 mRNA transcript levels using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). A stroke's severity was measured using the Stroke Severity Scale developed by the National Institutes of Health (NIHSS). After 30days, individuals with AIS were evaluated for progress using a modified Rankin Scale (mRS). There was no significant difference in SNHG14 LncRNA levels between TIA patients and controls, despite the huge rise in AIS incidence (p > 0.05) (all p < 0.001). Compared to those who did well on the AIS test, those who performed poorly had substantially greater levels of SNHG14 LncRNA (mRS 0-1 points) (mRS 0-2). LncRNA SNHG14 had an AUC of 0.714 (80%, 61.18%) when used to identify AIS in TIA patients, and a comparable finding was seen when predicting a poor 30-day prognosis of AIS (73%, 66.67%). There are also graphical representations of the findings. Improvements in NIHSS and mRS scores were associated with increases in SNHG14 LncRNA mRNA levels in individuals diagnosed with AIS. It is critical that we focus entirely on this decision (all p < 0.05). Analysis of the long non-coding RNA known as SNHG14 in the patient's blood can be used to diagnose AIS, rule out TIA, forecast the intensity of the disease, and evaluate the prognosis. You can accomplish everything on that list simultaneously.

Acquisition of Prehospital Stroke Severity Scale is associated with shorter door-to-puncture times in patients with prehospital notifications transported directly to a thrombectomy center

BackgroundWe sought to identify systemic factors influencing door-to-puncture times (DTP) among patients with pre-arrival notifications presenting directly to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) and undergoing emergent mechanical thrombectomy (MT).MethodsIn this...

Lower extremity physical function and quality of life in patients with stroke: a longitudinal cohort study

PurposeLower extremity physical function (LEPF) is a key component for mobility and is impacted in stroke-related disability. A reduction in LEPF can have a significant impact on an individual’s Quality of Life (QoL). The aim of this study is to characterise the relationship between LEPF and QoL.MethodsThe MOBITEC-Stroke Study is a longitudinal cohort-study including patients with their first occurrence of ischaemic stroke. Using a linear mixed-effects model, the relationship between LEPF (timed up-and-go performance (TUG); predictor) and QoL (Stroke Specific Quality of Life scale (SS-QoL); outcome) at 3 and 12 months post stroke was investigated and adjusted for sex, age, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), fear of falling (Falls Efficacy Scale-International Version, FES-I), and stroke severity (National Institute of Stroke Severity scale, NIHSS), accounting for the repeated measurements.ResultsData of 51 patients (65 % males, 35% females) were analysed. The mean age was 71.1 (SD 10.4) years, median NIHSS score was 2.0. SS-QoL was 201.5 (SD 20.5) at 3 months and 204.2 (SD 17.4) at 12 months; the mean change was 2.7 (95% CI -2.4 to 7.7), p= 0.293. A positive association was found between baseline TUG performance (estimate log score -13.923; 95% CI -27.495 to -0.351; p=0.048) and change in SS-QoL score in multivariate regression analysis.ConclusionHigher LEPF (i.e better TUG performance) at baseline, was associated with an improvement in QoL from 3- to 12-months post stroke. These results highlight the critical role of physical function, particularly baseline LEPF, in influencing the QoL of stroke survivors.

Prospective Validation of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, d ‐Dimer, and Clinical Scales for Acute Large‐Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke Detection

Background Large‐vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic stroke is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. We have previously described a novel tool for acute LVO detection that combines blood‐based biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein and d ‐dimer) with stroke severity scales to achieve high accuracy. Accordingly, the present study sought to prospectively validate cutoff values that we had previously established for biomarkers and scales. Methods The TIME (Testing for Identification Markers of Stroke) trial was designed as a prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study. All ambulance‐identified stroke code activations &lt;18 hours from symptom onset were recruited at Brandon Regional Hospital (Brandon, FL) between May 2021 and August 2022. Previously determined cutoff concentrations of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (213 pg/mL) and d ‐dimer (600 ng/mL) were used in combination with prehospital stroke scales to detect LVO. We compared rates of LVO detection against a reference standard using computed tomography/magnetic resonance angiography. Results A total of 382 patients with suspected stroke were recruited. The final cohort was composed of 323 patients with suspected stroke with the following distribution: LVO ischemic stroke (n = 29, 9%), non‐LVO ischemic stroke (n = 48, 15%), hemorrhagic stroke (n = 13, 4%), transient ischemic attack (n = 12, 3.9%), and stroke mimics (n = 220, 68.1%). Combining blood‐based biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein and d ‐dimer) with the scale field assessment stroke triage for emergency destination yielded the best performance for LVO detection, with specificity of 94% and sensitivity of 71%. Performance was found to be higher in a subanalysis focusing on patients presenting &lt;6 hours from symptom onset, with 93% specificity and 81% sensitivity. Critically, application of the biomarker and stroke scale algorithms ruled out all patients with hemorrhage. Conclusion The present work prospectively validated the potential utility of previously defined glial fibrillary acidic protein and d ‐dimer cutoff levels (ie, 213 pg/mL and 600 ng/mL, respectively), demonstrating their value for discrimination of LVO stroke from differential diagnoses during code stroke workups. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04292600.)

Retracted: Modified Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity (mPASS) Scale to Predict Emergent Large Arterial Occlusion.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1155/2021/5568696.].

Abstract WMP40: A Geospatial Information Services Assessment of Prehospital Bypass on Overtriage for Large Vessel Occlusion and Hemorrhagic Stroke

Introduction: To increase the number of patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischemic strokes (AIS) transported directly to Comprehensive Stroke Centers (CSCs), on December 1, 2021, the threshold score for our county EMS agency’s quantitative stroke severity scale (FAST-ED) for bypassing a non-CSC decreased from 7 to 6. The goal of this work was to evaluate the impact of and adherence to this change, and its effect on overtriage. Methods: Two large regional health systems and the county EMS agency collaborated on this study. Using latitude and longitude coordinates from our EMS agency’s database, we geocoded the pick-up location of all patients who had a FAST-ED score of ≥6 from September 2019 to December 2022. We used ArcGIS to calculate drive times to the closest facility among 2 CSCs and 7 non-CSCs, and linked EMS records to hospital records to determine LVO AIS involving the intracranial ICA, M1, M2 or basilar artery. For patients without a CSC as the closest destination facility, we defined overtriage as routing to a CSC for a non-LVO or non-hemorrhagic stroke patient. Results: Over our 40-month study period, among patients with a FAST-ED score performed (n=13,913), 824 had a score ≥6. Actual versus ArcGIS drive times in minutes [mean(SD)] compared favorably [14.8(8.5) vs 14.4(6.4), with an ICC of 0.68 (95% CI 0.64-0.72). For 799/824 patients (97%), one of the county’s two CSCs was not the closest destination facility, and among this group 99% (n=787/799) of EMS records were successfully linked to the hospital record. Among these patients, prior to December 1, 2021, 67% (n=219/326) patients with FAST-ED score ≥7 were bypassed to a CSC, with an overtriage rate of 49% (n=107/219), while after that date 88% (n=230/262) patients with a FAST-ED score ≥6 were bypassed to a CSC, with an overtriage rate of 55% (n=126/230). Conclusion: It is feasible to use drive times calculated from ArcGIS to evaluate the performance of EMS stroke triage and destination plans. Lowering our county’s FAST-ED score threshold for bypass increased adherence to the bypass protocol with a modest increase in overtriage. Future work will incorporate undertriage rates with the ultimate goal of optimizing our regional stroke and triage destination plan.

The predictive value of the CONUT score combined with the A2DS2 scale for post-ischemic stroke infection

Background/Aim. Stroke-associated infection is the most common and most serious complication of ischemic stroke (IS), which is the most important cause of death and disability in humans. The aim of the study was to determine the predictive value of nutrition risk score ? Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) combined with Age, Atrial Fibrillation, Dysphagia, Sex, Stroke Severity (A2DS2) scale for post-IS infection (PISI) in IS patients. Methods. This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 333 IS patients admitted to the Emergency Department of West China Hospital of Sichuan University from December 2017 to April 2019. Patients were divided into the NoPISI group (244 cases) and the PISI group (89 cases) based on whether they had a PISI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for PISI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the accuracy of different variables in predicting the outcome. Results. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the CONUT score [odds ratio (OR) = 1.321, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.040?1.677, p &lt; 0.05] and age (OR = 1.026, 95%CI: 1.004?1.048, p &lt; 0.05) were independent influencing factors for PISI. With the increase of the CONUT score, the proportion of PISI increased. Area under the ROC curve for predicting PISI was 0.651, 0.696, and 0.725 for CONUT, A2DS2, and CONUT plus A2DS2, respectively. Conclusion. Combining the CONUT score and A2DS2 scale enhances their predictability of PISI, thereby serving as a valuable tool for early risk assessment and clinical intervention.

The Pitfalls of NIHSS: Time for a New Clinical Acute Stroke Severity Scoring System in the Emergency?

Stroke is the second leading cause of death and a major cause of disability worldwide. Stroke severity scales serve as reliable means to track a patient's neurological deficit, predict outcome, and guide treatment decisions in clinical practice. The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was introduced over 30 years ago, marking a significant milestone in the field of stroke. Over the years, there have been notable advancements in acute stroke care. Despite several modifications made to NIHSS, none has yet succeeded in effectively capturing all the complex effects of a stroke. This review focuses on the pitfalls of NIHSS and emphasizes the need for a quick and comprehensive clinical and upgraded version of the stroke severity rating scale.

Artificial ventilation in patients with stroke: main results of the Russian multicenter observational clinical trial RETAS

To analyze the relationship between the characteristics of respiratory support (RS) for patients with stroke and clinical factors with the number and structure of complications, deaths, and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and duration of artificial pulmonary ventilation (ALV). The Russian multicenter observational clinical study «Respiratory Therapy for Acute Stroke» (RETAS) that enrolled 1289 patients with stroke requiring RS was conducted under the auspices of the All-Russian public organization «Federation of Anesthesiologists and Resuscitators». Indications for ALV, the use of hyperventilation, the maximum level of positive end-expiratory pressure, starting modes of mechanical ventilation, timing of tracheostomy, the incidence of protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) and infectious complications were analyzed. The following scales were used to assess the severity of the condition: the National Institutes of Health Stroke Severity Scale (NIHSS), the Glasgow Coma Scale, the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). For the group of patients with a stroke severity of more than 20 NIHSS points, the mortality increase was associated with initial hypoxia (p=0.004), hyperventilation used to relieve intracranial hypertension (p=0.034), and starting ventilation with volume control (VC) compared with starting pressure-controlled ventilation (PC) (p<0.001). We found that the use of the instrumental monitoring of intracranial pressure was associated with a decrease in mortality (p<0.001). The absence of PEM in patients with stroke is associated with a higher probability of a positive outcome (GOS 4 and 5) for the group with NIHSS less than 14 points (p<0.001). Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and ventilator-associated pneumonia were associated with an increase in the duration of ALV, the duration of weaning from the ventilator (for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis) and the duration of stay in the ICU, and also reduced the chances of favorable outcomes (p<0.05). The factors associated with increased mortality in acute stroke are: hypoxemia at the start of ALV, hyperventilation, starting ventilation with VC in comparison with starting ventilation with PC, the use of only clinical methods of monitoring intracranial pressure in comparison with instrumental monitoring. The adverse effect of PEM and infectious complications on the outcome in patients with acute stroke has been proven.

Large‐Vessel Occlusion Stroke Knowledge and Training for Stroke Severity Assessment Among Emergency Medical Services Personnel in the United States

BACKGROUND Prehospital identification of large‐vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke facilitates the development of a regional triage protocol that could lead to an improvement in intrahospital and interhospital workflows. This requires stroke education of emergency medical services (EMS) personnel to improve stroke recognition, severity assessment, and prenotification. However, the current state of EMS personnel's knowledge of LVO stroke, their training for stroke severity assessment, and their preferences for educational methods are unknown. We conducted a nationwide EMS survey across the United States to glean insights that can inform and customize future EMS educational efforts. METHODS The Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology, in collaboration with EMS World , created an online questionnaire for EMS personnel. It included 12 multiple‐choice and free‐response questions designed to test participants’ clinical knowledge of LVO, knowledge of stroke center certification levels, prior LVO educational experiences, preferences for educational content delivery, and perspectives on prehospital hurdles to stroke care. All subscribers of EMS World received a survey link via email. RESULTS Of the 38 486 subscribers of EMS World , the survey email was opened by 1830, of whom 1107 completed the survey across all states in the United States, with a response rate of 2.9%. Most of the respondents identified themselves as paramedics/emergency medical technicians (91%). The number of patients with stroke that survey participants transported in the past year was &lt;10 for 618 (56%). Only 285 (26%) participants answered both LVO knowledge questions correctly, and only 128 (12%) respondents correctly identified all types of stroke centers with thrombectomy capability. A total of 362 EMS personnel (33%) denied receiving training to perform LVO severity assessment. Respondents who received training to perform an LVO scale demonstrated nearly twice the prevalence of LVO knowledge (30.6% versus 15.7%; prevalence ratio, 1.94 [95% CI, 1.50–2.53]) than respondents who did not receive training. The top hurdle to prehospital LVO education was identified as the lack of standardized LVO training by 535 (48%) respondents. CONCLUSIONS EMS providers in the United States reported inadequate LVO training and demonstrated gaps in knowledge of LVO, stroke severity scales, and stroke center levels. Systematic efforts to enhance and standardize the educational content and delivery of LVO education are needed.

Validation of the prehospital stroke scales as a tool for in-hospital large vessel occlusion stroke: whether we satisfied?

Prehospital stroke severity scales have been widely used to identify whether community stroke patients presented with large vessel occlusion (LVO) or not. However, whether these scales are also applicable to in-hospital stroke patients remains unknown. We aim to validate and compare the predictive capability of these scales for these patients. From January 2016 to October 2020, a total of 243 patients who activated in-hospital stroke alerts, were included in this study. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess the predictive ability of five scales (Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination [FAST-ED], Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation [RACE], Los Angeles Motor Scale [LAMS], Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Severity Scale [CPSSS], and Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity scale [PASS]) for LVO. In addition, multivariable logistic analysis was adopted to determine the predictors of LVO in our patients cohort. Finally, 94 (38.7%) patients were confirmed presence of persistent LVO. The AUC for the FAST-ED, RACE, LAMS, CPSSS, and PASS scales to predict the presence of LVO in patients activating in-hospital stroke alerts were 0.82, 0.89, 0.86, 0.81, and 0.79, respectively. After multivariable analysis, baseline NIHSS (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.160, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.110-1.212; P < 0.001) atrial fibrillation (adjusted OR = 2.940, 95% CI = 1.387-6.230; P = 0.005) and cardiac/pulmonary procedure (adjusted OR = 6.861, 95% CI = 2.437-19.315; P < 0.001) remained independent predictors of LVO. The prehospital stroke scales also showed good predictive capabilities in discriminating LVO among inpatients who activated stroke alerts. However, given that inpatients' history is more readily available, a specifically designed in-hospital stroke scale that combines stroke severity and history is warranted.

Blood pressure variability and early neurological outcomes in acute and subacute stroke in Southwestern Uganda

BackgroundGreater blood pressure variability has detrimental effects on clinical outcome after a stroke; its effects are controversial and have not been evaluated in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). MethodsWe conducted a prospective study of patients with CT head confirmed ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes admitted to a tertiary hospital within 7 days of onset of unilateral neurological deficits. Blood pressure variability indices, standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of systolic and diastolic blood pressure between day 0 and day 7, were calculated with a subsequent modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score on day 14 post-stroke. Linear regression was performed to determine the exponential coefficients of mortality at 14 days post- stroke. ResultsOut of 120 patients, 51.7% were female, 52.5% had ischemic stroke and the overall median age was 65 (IQR 54–80) years. Twenty (16.7%) patients died within a median survival time of 7 days, while 32 (26.7%) died by day 14 post-stroke. Patients with hemorrhagic stroke had an overall SDSBP of 16.44 mmHg while those with ischemic stroke had an overall SDSBP of 14.05 mmHg. In patients with ischemic stroke, SDSBP had adjusted coefficients of 1, p = 0.004 with C·I: 1.01–1.04 and NIHSS had adjusted coefficients of 1, p = 0.019 with C·I: 1.00–1.03 while in patients with hemorrhagic stroke, SDSBP had adjusted coefficients of 1, p = 0.045 with C·I: 1.00–1.04 and NIHSS had adjusted coefficients of 1, p ≤0.001 with C·I: 1.01–1.03. ConclusionExponential increase in Blood Pressure Variability (BPV) and stroke severity scale were independently associated with early mortality among all stroke patients in our study. We recommend future studies to evaluate whether controlling BPV among patients with stroke in Sub-Saharan Africa can reduce mortality.

Early and late infarct growth rate in ischemic stroke patients after successful endovascular treatment in early time window: correlation of imaging and clinical factors with clinical outcome.

The prospective study assessed infarct growth rate (IGR) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO) after recanalization in early time window. Early IGR (EIGR) and late IGR (LIGR) were correlated with imaging and clinical data; we searched for outcome predictors. We included 71 consecutive patients. Subjects underwent computed tomography perfusion (CTP) for ischemic core volume assessment at 99.0 minutes (median) from stroke onset, recanalization was performed at 78.0 minutes (median) from CTP. Final infarct volume (FIV) was measured on 24±2 hours imaging follow-up. EIGR was calculated as the core volume/time between stroke onset and CTP; LIGR was calculated as FIV/time between CTP and imaging follow-up. Twenty-two subjects were assessed as poor outcome, 49 as good outcome. Group differences were tested by Mann-Whitney test and χ2 test. Bayesian logistic regression models were used to predict clinical outcome, Pearson correlations for the log-transformed predictors. Subjects with poor outcome were older, median age 78.0 [interquartile range (IQR): 71.8, 83.8] versus 68.0 (IQR: 57.0, 73.0) years; 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.00 to 16.00; P<0.001. Their stroke severity scale was higher, median 19.0 (IQR: 16.0, 20.0) versus 15.5 (IQR: 10.8, 18.0); 95% CI: 1.00 to 6.00; P<0.001. They had higher EIGR, median 23.9 (IQR: 6.4, 104.0) versus 6.7 (IQR: 1.7, 13.0) mL/h; 95% CI: 3.26 to 53.68; P=0.002; and larger core, median 52.5 (IQR: 13.1, 148.5) versus 10.0 (IQR: 1.4, 20.0) mL; 95% CI: 11.00 to 81.00; P<0.001. In subjects with poor outcome, infarct growth continued after thrombectomy with LIGR 2.0 (IQR: 1.2, 9.7) versus 0.3 (IQR: 0.0, 0.7) mL/h; 95% CI: 1.10 to 6.10; P<0.001; resulting in larger FIV, median 186.5 (IQR: 49.3, 280.8) versus 18.5 (IQR: 8.0, 34.0) mL; 95% CI: 55.30 to 214.00; P<0.001. Strong correlations among predictors were found e.g., core and EIGR (r=0.942), LIGR and FIV (r=0.779), core and FIV (r=0.761). Clinical outcome was best predicted using data from later measurements as FIV and LIGR. Data from later measurements were more predictive, there was no major benefit to use growth over volume data.

Inter-Rater Agreement on Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) and Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity Scale (PASS) Between EMS Providers, Neurology Residents and Neurology Consultants.

To examine the agreement between emergency medical service (EMS) providers, neurology residents and neurology consultants, using the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) and the Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity Scale (PASS). Patients with stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke mimic were included upon primary stroke admission or during rehabilitation. Patients were included from June 2018 to September 2019. Video recordings were made of patients being assessed with CPSS and PASS. The recordings were later presented to the healthcare professionals. To determine relative and absolute interrater reliability in terms of inter-rater agreement (IRA), we used generalisability theory. Group-level agreement was determined against a gold standard and presented as an area under the curve (AUC). The gold standard was a consensus agreement between two neurology consultants. A total of 120 patient recordings were assessed by 30 EMS providers, two neurology residents and two neurology consultants. Using the CPSS and the PASS, a total of 1,800 assessments were completed by EMS providers, 240 by neurology residents and 240 by neurology consultants. The overall relative and absolute IRA for all items combined from the CPSS and PASS score was 0.84 (95% CI 0.80; 0.87) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.77; 0.85), respectively. Using the CPSS, the agreement on a group-level resulted in AUCs of 0.83 (95% CI 0.78; 0.88) for the EMS providers and 0.86 (95% CI 0.82; 0.90) for the neurology residents when compared with the gold standard. Using the PASS, the AUC was 0.82 (95% CI 0.77; 0.87) for the EMS providers and 0.88 (95% CI 0.84; 0.93) for the neurology residents. The high relative and absolute inter-rater agreement underpins a high robustness/generalisability of the two scales. A high agreement exists across individual raters and different groups of healthcare professionals supporting widespread applicability of the stroke scales.

Low-flow extra-intracranial bypass in acute carotid and vertebrobasilar ischemic stroke (literature review)

Introduction. The effectiveness of the method of revascularization of the brain using extra‑intracranial bypass in chronic insufficiency of blood supply to the brain has been studied in several randomized multicenter studies. The analysis of available publications devoted to this technique for 10 years with acute strokes in the carotid basin and for 20 years with ischemic strokes in the vertebrobasilar basin was carried out.Aim. To improve the results of treatment of ischemic strokes with the help of emergency extra‑intracranial low‑flow bypasses in the acute and acute period. In 12 publications over the past 10 years, selected from the PubMed search engine, 194 cases of the use of emergency extra‑intracranial microbypasses in the acute and acute period of ischemic stroke in the carotid basin were identified, 127 cases of emergency extra‑intracranial bypass were found in 6 articles during the last 20 years in the acute phase of vertebra‑basilar area stroke. Middle patient age in carotid group was 61.9 years, and 65 years in vertebral patient’s group. The male / female ratio was 3 / 1. The main indications for the bypass creation were: worsening of neurologic deficit from 4 and more according to the Stroke Severity Scale of the US National Institutes of Health, mini mal or not significant computed tomography (CT) or diffusion‑weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW‑MRI) ischemia brain changes (not lower than 8 points on the scale of assessment of initial changes in the computed tomographic (CT) examination for stroke Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, ASPECTS), signs of significant brachiocephalic arteries atherosclerotic stenosis. In 83 carotid group cases perfusion‑diffusion mismatch was distinguished before bypass creation. In 111 carotid cases and in priority of vertebra‑basilar cases clinic‑diffusion mismatch was the only indication for emergency extra‑intracranial bypass creation. During the first 24 hours 65 % of carotid group bypass were performed, in other 35 % of cases bypasses were performed during 1 week after the stroke onset. There were 78 % of good results (&lt;2 on the Rankin outcome scale, mRS) and 22 % of poor (mRS &gt;2) in carotid stroke group. Mortality was 3 %. In vertebral group, coma was not contraindication for emergence extra‑intracranial bypass creation. In most cases, 70 % of bypass were performed between superficial temporal artery and superior cerebellar artery. Mortality in vertebral stroke group was 5 %, mostly because of somatic pathology worsening. Good results were achieved in76 % of cases.Conclusion. In some cases of atherosclerotic carotid and vertebrobasilar ischemic stroke, results of recovery can be approved greatly with use of emergency low‑flow extra‑intracranial bypass, if intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular tromboextraction were failed.

Incidence of mechanical thrombectomy among stroke patients brought directly to a comprehensive stroke center versus transfer from a primary stroke center in upstate New York.

Faster time to treatment for stroke is associated with improved outcomes. In cases of large vessel occlusion (LVO), standard of care treatment with thrombectomy can only be provided at a comprehensive stroke center (CSC). We examine the outcomes of patients who are directly brought to our center, a CSC, compared to those seen at a primary stroke center (PSC) and then transferred. Patients with LVO presenting to our center from 1/1/2019 to 12/31/2019 were included. Cohorts of patients presenting first to a PSC and presenting first to a CSC were compared. Demographics and outcome metrics (Discharge Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and National Institute of Health Stroke Severity Scale (NIHSS) scores) were obtained for all LVO patients. Imaging was also assessed. Of 864 stroke admissions, 346 had LVO (40%) with 183 (53%) transferring from a PSC and 163 (47%) presenting directly. Similar percentages of each cohort were taken for thrombectomy (25.1% transfer and 31.3% direct). However, as distance between PSC and CSC increased, likelihood of thrombectomy decreased. Transfer patients were more likely to be excluded from thrombectomy secondary to a large volume of complete stroke (p = 0.0001). Direct presenters had lower discharge mRS scores than transfer patients (p < 0.01), however, severity of stroke upon admission was similar in the two groups. Patients transferred from a PSC were more likely to have a worse outcome at time of discharge than those presenting directly to our center. Large volume of completed stroke was a frequent reason for exclusion from thrombectomy. Optimizing stroke protocols to CSC in cases of LVOs may result in better outcomes.

Abstract TMP46: Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Knowledge And Clinical Training In Emergency Medical Service Personnel In The United States

Background: Stroke education of emergency medical service (EMS) personnel improves stroke recognition, prenotification, and thrombolytic delivery. Prehospital identification of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke may facilitate the creation of a regional bypass protocol and improvement of intrahospital and interhospital workflows. However, the current status of EMS personnel’s knowledge of LVO, their stroke severity assessment training, and preferences in educational methods have not been studied. We conducted an EMS survey across the United States. Methods: The Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN) in collaboration with EMS-World created an online questionnaire distributed to all subscribers of EMS-World involved in pre-hospital work. It included 12 multiple-choice questions to test participants on LVO knowledge, stroke center certification levels, prior LVO education, and preferences on educational content delivery. Results: The survey email was opened by 1830 subscribers out of whom 1107 (60%) completed the survey across 50 states in the United States. Respondents identified themselves as paramedics/EMTs (91.4%), ground critical care (5.7%) and flight crew (2.9%). The number of stroke patients that survey participants transported in the past year was &lt;10 for 618 (55.8%), 10 to 25 for 332 (30%), and &gt;25 (14.2%). Two hundred eighty-five (25.8%) participants answered both LVO knowledge questions correctly and 379 (34.2%) answered one correctly. Only 128 (11.6%) correctly identified all types of centers with thrombectomy capability. Although 877 (79.2%) were familiar with at least one stroke severity scale, 376 (34%) denied receiving training to perform them. Five sixty-seven (51.2%) respondents preferred in-person training for LVO training and 429 (38.8%) an online training program. About half of all respondents (535,48%) picked 'lack of standardized LVO training' as the greatest hurdle to pre-hospital LVO management. Conclusion: EMS providers in the United States reported inadequate LVO training and demonstrated gaps in knowledge of LVO, stroke severity scales, and stroke center levels. Systematic efforts to enhance and standardize the educational content and delivery of LVO education are urgently needed.

Abstract NS6: Impact On Mechanical Thrombectomy Numbers: Advanced Imaging For All Versus Large Vessel Occlusion Screen Triage

Background: Our five-hospital Comprehensive Stroke Program utilized the vision, aphasia, neglect [VAN] large vessel occlusion [LVO] screening tool to triage patients for Computed Tomography Angiography [CTA] with initial imaging. With the development of a Mechanical Thrombectomy [MT] Capable Center the decision was made to perform CTA on all stroke alerts [CTA-ALL] in an effort to increase the numbers treated with MT. Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of CTA-ALL in our emergency departments and the impact on numbers with MT. Method: A retrospective review of 426 acute ischemic stroke alert patients [AIS-SA] who arrived within 8 hours of last known well over an 18-month period was conducted with 206 identified as pre-change [PRE] and 220 as post-change [POST]. The NIHSS was evaluated for components of the VAN screening tool to determine if patients were VAN positive [VAN+]. Each group was divided into NIHSS 0-5, NIHSS ≥ 6 and VAN+. Groups were then compared by VAN+, CTA-ALL, LVO+ and MT to determine the impact on numbers treated. Results: The POST group showed a 12% increase of CTA-ALL, with the largest increase in NIHSS 0-5 [22%]. In addition, there was a 3% increase in LVO+ and a 5% increase in MT, with the largest increase in NIHSS ≥ 6, 5% and 11% respectively. There were no additional patients treated in POST NIHSS 0-5. AIS-SA patients with a VAN+ screen resulted in fewer CTAs, identified a higher percentage of LVO+ and treated the same number of MT. Conclusion: Performing CTA-ALL for NIHSS 0-5 did not increase our MT numbers; in fact, it remained zero. Although an increased number of LVO+ was noted POST CTA-ALL in the NIHSS≥ 6 compared to VAN+, the total number of MT was the same in both groups. Thus, compared to PRE triage with VAN+, POST CTA-ALL increased overall imaging use without increasing the sensitivity of our MT triage. Our results support stroke triage with stroke severity scales such as VAN rather than CTA-ALL to optimize sensitivity and neuroimaging utilization.

Effect of tracheostomy timing in pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a prevalent cause of disability and death in the pediatric population, often requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Patients with significant TBI or intracranial hemorrhage require advanced airway management to protect against aspiration, hypoxia, and hypercarbia, eventually necessitating tracheostomy. While tracheostomy is much less common in children compared to adults, its prevalence among pediatric populations has been steadily increasing. Although early tracheostomy has demonstrated improved outcomes in adult patients, optimal tracheostomy timing in the pediatric population with TBI remains to be definitively established. This retrospective cohort analysis aims to evaluate pediatric TBI patients who undergo tracheostomy and to investigate the impact of tracheostomy timing on outcomes. The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Kids' Inpatient Database (KID), collected between in 2016 and 2019, was queried using International Classification of Disease 10th edition (ICD10) codes for patients with traumatic brain injury who had received a tracheostomy. Baseline demographics, insurance status, and procedural day data were analyzed with univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Propensity score matching was performed to estimate the incidence of medical complications and mortality related to early versus late tracheostomy timing (as defined by median=9 days). Of the 68,793 patients (mean age=14, IQR 4-18) who suffered a TBI, 1,956 (2.8%) received a tracheostomy during their hospital stay. TBI patients who were tracheostomized were older (mean age=16.5 vs 11.4 years), more likely to have injuries classified as severe TBIs and more likely to have accumulated more than one indicator of parenchymal injury as measured by the Composite Stroke Severity Scale (CSSS >1) than non-tracheostomized TBI patients. TBI patients with a tracheostomy were more likely to encounter serious complications such as sepsis, acute kidney injury (AKI), meningitis, or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). They were also more likely to necessitate an external ventricular drain (EVD) or decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) than TBI patients without a tracheostomy. Tracheostomy was also negatively associated with routine discharge. Procedural timing was assessed in 1,867 patients; older children (age >15 years) were more likely to undergo earlier placements (p<0.001). Propensity score matching (PSM) comparing early versus late placement was completed by controlling for age, gender, and TBI severity. Those who were subjected to late tracheostomy (>9 days) were more likely to face complications such as AKI or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) as well as a host of respiratory conditions such as pulmonary embolism, aspiration pneumonitis, pneumonia, or ARDS. While the timing did not significantly impact mortality across the PSM cohorts, late tracheostomy was associated with increased length of stay (LOS) and ventilator dependence. Tracheostomy, while necessary for some patients who have sustained a TBI, is itself associated with several risks that should be assessed in context of each individual patient's overall condition. Additionally, the timing of the intervention may significantly impact the trajectory of the patient's recovery. Early intervention may reduce the incidence of serious complications as well as length of stay and dependence on a ventilator and facilitate a timelier recovery.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Seizure Prophylaxis Among Adults After Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Older adults occasionally receive seizure prophylaxis in an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) setting, despite safety concerns. There are no trial data available about the net impact of early seizure prophylaxis on post-AIS survival. Using a stroke registry (American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines) individually linked to electronic health records, we examined the effect of initiating seizure prophylaxis (ie, epilepsy-specific antiseizure drugs) within 7 days of an AIS admission versus not initiating in patients ≥65 years admitted for a new, nonsevere AIS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Severity score ≤20) between 2014 and 2021 with no recorded use of epilepsy-specific antiseizure drugs in the previous 3 months. We addressed confounding by using inverse-probability weights. We performed standardization accounting for pertinent clinical and health care factors (eg, National Institutes of Health Stroke Severity scale, prescription counts, seizure-like events). The study sample included 151 patients who received antiseizure drugs and 3020 who did not. The crude 30-day mortality risks were 219 deaths per 1000 patients among epilepsy-specific antiseizure drugs initiators and 120 deaths per 1000 among noninitiators. After standardization, the estimated mortality was 251 (95% CI, 190-307) deaths per 1000 among initiators and 120 (95% CI, 86-144) deaths per 1000 among noninitiators, corresponding to a risk difference of 131 (95% CI, 65-200) excess deaths per 1000 patients. In the prespecified subgroup analyses, the risk difference was 52 (95% CI, 11-72) among patients with minor AIS and 138 (95% CI, 52-222) among moderate-to-severe AIS patients. Similarly, the risk differences were 86 (95% CI, 18-118) and 157 (95% CI, 57-219) among patients aged 65 to 74 years and ≥75 years, respectively. There was a higher risk of 30-day mortality associated with initiating versus not initiating seizure prophylaxis within 7 days post-AIS. This study does not support the role of seizure prophylaxis in reducing 30-day poststroke mortality.