Donna J. Haraway, Staying with Trouble: Making Kin in Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016. 296 pp.If you have read any anthropology in past few years, you'll have learned that live in Anthropocene, an epoch wherein humans have been primary determinants of transformation upon earth. We have burned through fossil fuels, destroyed ecosystems, and charted a course for uninhabitable climate change, while exponentially increasing our numbers. And now, a global ecological disaster is upon us. Donna Haraway denies none of these facts, but is impatient with what she sees as two dominant responses to this calamitous future: a comic faith in technofixes...[that] technology will somehow come to rescue of its naughty but very clever children; and a position that the game is over, it's too late, there's no sense trying to make anything better (3). It is against these two views that she proposes attempt to stay with trouble, that is, face situation head on with recognition that we require each other in unexpected collaborations and combinations,...we become-with each other or not at all (4). Based on idea of becoming-with other humans, but more importantly with non-human others, Haraway traces a possible reconfiguring of way exist on this planet in present, leading to an imaginable future that narrowly avoids our currently impending ruin. Along way, she is guided by framing motif SF: Science Fiction, Speculative Fabulation, String Figures, Speculative Feminism, Science Fact, So Far (2). The book can be split into three parts: first (and by far largest) part, Chapters 1-4, introduces new theory in hefty, circuitous, and poetic ways; part two, Chapters 5-7, explores examples of different kinds of becoming-with and exercises theory on ground; finally, Chapter 8 takes a turn into Science Fiction (or Speculative Fabulation), writing a narrative history of next 400 years in a world that has (in present day) chosen to stay with trouble and avert tragedy.Chapter 1, Playing String Figures With Companion Species, continues Haraway's premise in The Companion Species Manifesto (2003), this time focusing on our becoming-with species-animal, insect, and bacterial. Expanding her Cyborgian interrogation-why should our bodies end at skin(1991:178)-she challenges posthuman, now incorporating much more than humanity and technoscience. We are post-posthuman in our engagement with our companion species. We are compost (com-post): ontological ly heterogenous partners becom[ing] who and what they are in material-semiotic worlding (13). Haraway also introduces her first major SF motif here-String Figures. String figure games such as Cat's Cradle or Navajo Coyotes Running Opposite Ways require what Haraway calls response-ability, meaning that partners must take turns accepting and relinquishing responsibility for a successful finished product. It is this type of ability must extend to our companion species. This chapter also implies how book should be read. Terms like compost and response-ability serve as cues to readers that book itself is a game, but one they have a responsibility to play along with. In tradition of Haraway's writing, book introduces many new terms and uses them throughout. Like numerous characters (and nicknames) in a Tolstoy novel, readers must pay careful attention to new vocabulary, lest they miss brief definition tucked in middle of a paragraph in a middle chapter, after word has already appeared several times over.Chapter 2, Tentacular Thinking, asks us to reimagine our current paradigm through connections have with other species. To think like tentacles is to take up life lived along lines (32) rather than at points or spheres; in other words, thinking through connections, not connected. As a part of book's game, Haraway's circuitous and interwoven literary style forces readers into thinking tentacularly, which turns us away from concept of bounded individualism-the crux of Haraway's rejection of label Anthropocene. …
Read full abstract