Three methods designed to estimate the catabolic versatility of metal-affected soil microbial communities were compared with each other and with a method described previously. All are based on the differential catabolism of 21 aromatic acids. In contrast to the original USIB-method which aims at analysing the utilisation of these substrates by isolated bacteria, the CFU-method allows to determine substrate-specific colony-forming units. The simpler SSC- and SOIL-methods were designed to measure substrate-specific degradation times in soil suspension cultures or in soil, respectively. While bacteria were exclusively multiplying in the neutral soil suspension cultures, oxidation in soil of the nonneutralised aromatic acids was predominantly due to fungal activities. Assuming a short degradation time is correlated with a high biomass possessing the corresponding catabolic potential and vice versa, relative inverse substrate-specific degradation times were calculated from the data obtained with the SSC- and SOIL-methods. They could be directly compared with the relative frequencies of the substrate-specific capabilities determined with the CFU- and USIB-methods. Although all methods were applied to the same soils the metal-induced shifts in substrate utilisation potentials were not very consistent. This insufficient agreement between method-specific data is explained by the fact that, with the USIB-method, only positive or negative reactions are recorded whereas with the CFU, SSC and SOIL methods, enzyme synthesis as well as growth rate and selection of organisms play unknown roles and mask the actual distribution of catabolic capabilities. A correct assessment of the distribution of the catabolic capabilities is, therefore, only possible with approaches similar to the USIB-method. In spite of these inconsistencies, the CFU-, SSC- and SOIL-methods are capable, as the original USIB-method, of indicating stress-induced shifts in the catabolic potentials of bacterial communities by eco-physiological indices, such as ‘catabolic versatility’. Though this index depends on the method applied it decreases with increasing metal contamination of soils. When comparing the control and the most contaminated soils, decreases in the catabolic versatility of about 40, 37, 30 and 24% were found for the USIB-, SSC-, CFU- and SOIL-methods, respectively.
Read full abstract