AbstractHydrologic, terrestrial, and biologic disturbances influence stream channel conditions that are important to the persistence of aquatic biota. Past studies of how disturbance events alter streams have focused on fires, floods, and debris torrents as the magnitude of these events make them easy to detect. This approach has led to a bias in understanding which disturbances are likely to affect stream conditions. To address this concern, we used stream habitat data to identify where a substantial change in stream conditions had occurred and then used photographs of the evaluated reach to determine the disturbance that potentially caused those changes. We evaluated conditions in over 2,000 stream reaches and found that nearly a quarter of them had seen a substantial change in at least one of the five stream channel characteristics (bank‐full width, wood frequency, median particle size, pool depth, and bank stability) in the two decades that these streams were monitored. Although many stream reaches were affected by charismatic disturbance events such as fires, floods, and mass wasting, the majority of the substantial changes we observed in channel conditions were related to small‐scale disturbances. Mechanisms such as beavers, tree fall, vegetative growth, grazing, and active restoration all played an important role in bringing about large changes in stream channel conditions. While the majority of the disturbances were natural, some channel changes remain tied to anthropogenic activities. Our results suggest that no single sampling approach can be used to evaluate how stream conditions respond to all disturbances as they vary in intensity, over space and time, and based on which stream attribute is measured. By better understanding the full range of possible disturbances, managers should be better able to use such events to improve outcomes for streams and aquatic biota.
Read full abstract