Strategies For Coronary Artery Disease Research Articles

The Current State of Coronary Revascularization: Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

The optimal revascularization strategy for coronary artery disease depends on various factors, such as disease complexity, patient characteristics, and preferences. Including a heart team in complex cases is crucial to ensure optimal outcomes. Decision-making between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting must consider each patient's clinical profile and coronary anatomy. While current practice guidelines offer some insight into the optimal revascularization approach for the various phenotypes of coronary artery disease, the evidence to support either strategy continues to evolve and grow. Given the large amount of contemporary data on revascularization, this review aims to comprehensively summarize the literature on coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients across the spectrum of coronary artery disease phenotypes. Contemporary evidence suggests that for patients with triple vessel disease, coronary artery bypass grafting is preferred over percutaneous coronary intervention due to better long-term outcomes, including lower rates of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Similarly, for patients with left main coronary artery disease, both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting can be considered, as they have shown similar efficacy in terms of major adverse cardiac events, but there may be a slightly higher risk of death with percutaneous coronary intervention. For proximal left anterior descending artery disease, both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting are viable options, but coronary artery bypass grafting has shown lower rates of repeat revascularization and better relief from angina. The Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score can help in decision-making by predicting the risk of adverse events and guiding the choice between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting. European and American guidelines both agree with including a heart team that can develop and lay out individualized, optimal treatment options with respect for patient preferences. The debate between coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in multiple different scenarios will continue to develop as technology and techniques improve for both procedures. Risk factors, pre, peri, and post-procedural complications involved in both revascularization strategies will continue to be mitigated to optimize outcomes for those patients for which coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention provide ultimate benefit. Methods to avoid unnecessary revascularization continue to develop as well as percutaneous technology that may allow patients to avoid surgical intervention when possible. With such changes, revascularization guidelines for specific patient populations may change in the coming years, which can serve as a limitation of this time-dated review.

Comparison between Imaging and Physiology in Guiding Coronary Revascularization: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a widely used revascularization strategy for coronary artery disease. The choice between imaging-guided and physiology-guided PCI has been a subject of debate. This meta-analysis aims to systematically compare outcomes between imaging and physiology-guided PCI and management of intermediate coronary lesions (ICLs). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases for studies published up to December 2023 following PRISMA guidelines. Seven eligible studies comparing imaging-guided and physiology-guided PCI were selected for the final analysis. Relevant outcome measures included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), target vessel revascularization (TVR), target vessel failure (TVF), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Subgroup analysis was performed for ICLs. Results: A total of 5701 patients were included in the meta-analysis. After a mean follow-up of 2.1 years, imaging-guided PCI was associated with lower rates of TVR compared to physiology-guided PCI (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.95, p = 0.02); concerning MACE, TVF, and TLR, no differences were found. When the analysis was restricted to studies considering ICLs management, there were no differences between the two techniques. Meta regression analysis did not show any impact of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) presentation on MACE and TVR. Conclusions: The findings suggest that imaging-guided PCI may reduce the need for future revascularization of the target vessel compared to the functional-guided approach, and this result was not influenced by ACS presentation. These results may have important implications for clinical practice, guiding interventional cardiologists in selecting the most appropriate guidance strategy.

Exploring the Interplay of Uric Acid and Advanced Oxidation Protein Products Following Myocardial Infarction

Recent studies have underscored the potential elevation of Advanced Oxidation Protein Products (AOPP) and uric acid following myocardial infarction, suggesting their involvement in the development and progression of coronary artery disease and potentially influencing patient outcomes. This study focuses explicitly on examining uric acid and AOPP in the same patients to address the research gap in these biomarkers’ interplay. Recognizing the dual character of uric acid as both an antioxidant and a pro-oxidant, this study delves into its complex biological implications. An analysis was conducted on 40 patients who had experienced myocardial infarction. AOPP levels were quantified using absorbance at 340 nm. Results demonstrated significantly increased AOPP levels in myocardial infarction patients compared to healthy controls, especially in those with high serum uric acid. The serum uric acid and AOPP relationship exhibits a J-shaped curve, indicating a complex, multifactorial interaction. These findings offer new insights into the intricate relationship between serum uric acid and AOPP in myocardial infarction patients, underscoring the significance of these biomarkers in enhancing our understanding of clinical outcomes and informing targeted management strategies for coronary artery disease.

Chinese expert consensus on the clinical application of drug-coated balloon (2nd Edition).

Percutaneous coronary interventions have progressed through the era of plain balloon dilation, bare-metal stent insertion to drug-eluting stent treatment, which has significantly reduced the acute occlusion and restenosis rates of target vessels and improved patient prognosis, making drug-eluting stents the mainstream interventional treatment for coronary artery disease. In recent years, drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have become a new treatment strategy for coronary artery disease, and the drugs used in the coating and the coating technology have progressed in the past years. Without permanent implant, a DCB delivers antiproliferative drugs rapidly and uniformly into the vessel wall via the excipient during a single balloon dilation. Many evidence suggests that DCB angioplasty is an effective measure for dealing with in-stent restenosis and de novo lesions in small coronary vessels. As more clinical studies are published, new evidence is emerging for the use of DCB angioplasty in a wide range of coronary diseases, and the indications are expanding internationally. Based on the latest research from China and elsewhere, the Expert Writing Committee of the Chinese Expert Consensus on Clinical Applications of Drug-Coated Balloon has updated the previous DCB consensus after evidence-based discussions and meetings in terms of adequate preparation of in-stent restenosis lesions, expansion of the indications for coronary de novo lesions, and precise guidance of DCB treatment by intravascular imaging and functional evaluation.

Drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

BackgroundDrug-coated balloons (DCBs) are an established strategy for coronary artery disease. However, the new generation drug-eluting stent (DES) is recommended for patients with Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) for coronary artery revascularization. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive appraisal of the efficacy of DCBs in patients with AMI undergoing PCI.MethodsWe searched the WOS, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL till March 2023, for studies that compared DCBs versus DES in patients with AMI undergoing PCI. We used a random-effects model to compare major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiac death, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis, Late lumen Loss (LLL), and minimum lumen diameter (MLD) between the two groups.ResultsThirteen studies comprising 2644 patients were included. The pooled OR showed non-inferiority of DCB over DES in terms of MACE (OR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.57 to 1.40], p = 0.63). When we defined MACE as a composite of cardiac death, MI, and TLR; the pooled OR favored DCB over DES (OR = 0.50, 95% CI [0.28 to 0.9], p = 0.02). Moreover, DCB was not inferior to DES in terms of all-cause mortality (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.8, p = 0.73), cardiac mortality, (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.22 to 1.56, p = 0.29), MI (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.34 to 2.29, p = 0.79), stent thrombosis (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.35 to 4.23, p = 0.76), TLR (OR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.93, p = 0.8), LLL (MD = -0.6, 95% CI: -0.3 to 0.19, p = 0.64), or MLD (MD = -0.4, 95% CI: -0.33 to 0.25, p = 0.76).ConclusionOur meta-analysis indicated that DCB intervention was not inferior to DES in the PCI setting in patients with AMI, and can be recommended as a feasible strategy in AMI.PROSPERO registrationCRD42023412757.

Mortality Associated with the Number of Diseased Vessels and Therapeutic Strategies for Coronary Artery Disease: Long-Term Follow-Up

Background: The number of coronary arteries affected by atherosclerosis is believed to impact the prognosis of coronary artery disease, resulting in a higher incidence of cardiac events. However, conclusive results on the relationship between the extent of coronary atherosclerosis and outcomes are lacking. Methods: This retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study included patients with stable coronary artery disease and preserved ventricular function who had the option of any of the three therapeutic strategies (medicine, angioplasty, or surgery) included in the MASS-Trials database. Patients were stratified according to the number of diseased arteries forming single-vessel, double-vessel, and triple-vessel disease groups. The atherosclerotic burden was assessed using the SYNTAX Score. Each group was eligible for any of the three therapeutic strategies. The primary endpoint was overall mortality. Secondary endpoints included the combination of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and additional coronary interventions. Results: Between May 1998 and June 2009, 2,000 patients who met the inclusion criteria in the MASS-Trial database were included. The study enrolled 1,855 patients. Of these, 224(12%) had single-vessel disease (SVD), 536(29%) had double-vessel disease (2VD), and 1,095(59%) had triple-vessel disease (3VD). The entire follow-up of our sample was 5 years. Overall mortality for SVD, 2VD, and 3VD was 9(4%), 33(6.3%), and 43(3.9%), respectively (P=0.054). Pairwise comparison of mortality at 5-year follow-up showed no significant differences between SVD x 2VD, SVD x 3VD, and 2VD x 3VD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.41, 95% CI: 0.81-2.44). The secondary endpoints (combination of overall mortality, nonfatal infarction, and additional revascularization) also revealed no significant differences (P=0.2). Conclusions: Overall mortality was similar regardless of the number of diseased arteries and the degree of arterial involvement. These data suggest that optimized medical treatment as an initial strategy is safe and has a similar rate of events in any applied therapeutic option.

Preoperative frailty and adverse outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in US veterans.

Contemporary guidelines emphasize the value of incorporating frailty into clinical decision-making regarding revascularization strategies for coronary artery disease. Yet, there are limited data describing the association between frailty and longer-term mortality among coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort study (2016-2020, 40 VA medical centers) of US veterans nationwide that underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Frailty was quantified by the Veterans Administration Frailty Index (VA-FI), which applies the cumulative deficit method to render a proportion of 30 pertinent diagnosis codes. Patients were classified as non-frail (VA-FI ≤ 0.1), pre-frail (0.1 < VA-FI ≤ 0.2), or frail (VA-FI > 0.2). We used Cox proportional hazards models to ascertain the association of frailty with all-cause mortality. Our primary study outcome was 5-year all-cause mortality; the co-primary outcome was days alive and out of the hospital within the first postoperative year. There were 13,554 CABG patients (median 69 years, 79% White, 1.5% women). The mean pre-operative VA-FI was 0.21 (SD: 0.11); 31% were pre-frail (VA-FI: 0.17) and 47% were frail (VA-FI: 0.31). Frail patients were older and had higher co-morbidity burdens than pre-frail and non-frail patients. Compared with non-frail patients (13.0% [11.4, 14.7]), there was a significant association between frail and pre-frail patients and increased cumulative 5-year all-cause mortality (frail: 24.8% [23.3, 26.1]; HR: 1.75 [95% CI 1.54, 2.00]; pre-frail 16.8% [95% CI 15.3, 18.4]; HR 1.2 [1.08,1.34]). Compared with non-frail patients (mean 362[SD 12]), pre-frail (mean 361 [SD 14]; p < 0.01) and frail patients (mean 358[SD 18]; p < 0.01) spent fewer days alive and out of the hospital in the first postoperative year. Pre-frailty and frailty were prevalent among US veterans undergoing CABG and associated with worse mid-term outcomes. Given the high prevalence of frailty with attendant adverse outcomes, there may be an opportunity to improve outcomes by identifying and mitigating frailty before surgery.

Preoperative albumin corrected anion gap is associated with in-hospital and long-term mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in a retrospective cohort study.

Coronary artery disease remains a global health concern and the leading cause of death. Till today, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is one of the main treatment strategies for coronary artery disease, especially for Multivessel coronary disease or complex coronary lesions. The present study aimed to explore the relationship of preoperative albumin corrected anion gap (ACAG) with mortality in all those patients who undergoing CABG. All the patients undergoing CABG were included in the study. All clinical data were collected from CareVue and MetaVision system. The predictive value of ACAG for mortality was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate regression models were constructed to determine the association of ACAG with mortality. A total of 2,180 patients were identified and divided into a high ACAG group (ACAG ≥16.0 mmol/L) and low ACAG group (ACAG <16.0 mmol/L) according to the ROC analysis. Patients in the high ACAG group were older and presented with more comorbidities and concomitant valvular surgeries. Further more, in the high ACAG group, we observed a higher length of stay in the intensive care unit [3.88 (2.15, 7.09) vs. 2.29 (1.29, 3.94), P<0.001]. Both the in-hospital mortality [28 (4.5%) vs. 11 (0.7%), P<0.001], and the 4-year mortality [125 (27.1%) vs. 111 (12.7%), P<0.001] were also rised in those patients. And it was also showed in the survival curves, patients with ACAG ≥16.0 mmol/L had a significant lower 4-year survival (P<0.001). While in the multivariate regression model, we found ACAG was act as an independent risk factor for both the in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR): 1.248 (1.060, 1.470), P=0.008] and the 4-year mortality [hazard ratio (HR): 1.134 (1.063, 1.210), P<0.001]. An ACAG ≥16.0 mmol/L was significantly associated with a 2.7-fold risk of in-hospital mortality [OR: 2.732 (1.129, 6.610), P=0.026]. Preoperative ACAG is an independent risk factor for in-hospital and long-term mortality in CABG patients. A higher ACAG may relate to severe coronary artery stenosis and cardiac dysfunction, which is more likely to lead to a postoperative systemic inflammatory response, microcirculation disorder, and subsequent complications.

Occurrence of Bleeding Complications of Radial and Femoral Artery Routes in Patients Undergoing Percutanous Coronary Intervention

Background: Percutaneous coronary angiography and percutaneous trans-luminal coronary angioplasty are the standard diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for coronary artery disease [1]. Angiography/ percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is usually performed by the femoral and radial artery routes. However, the ulnar artery can also be used [2]. Conventionally, the femoral route has been favored for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention, but there is growing interest for radial access due to reduced hemorrhagic complications during and after the procedure. This is due to the fact that severe bleeding is considered a determinant of poor prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome [3]. In the current practice of interventional cardiology, it has been recognized that bleeding has become the most common early complication associated with PCI [4]. Objective: To determine the frequency of bleeding complications of radial and femoral artery routes (major bleeding and localized hematoma formation) in patients undergoing Percutanous Coronary Intervention. Setting: This cross sectional study Department of Cardiology, Cardiology, AFIC &amp; National Institute of Heart Diseases Rawalpindi. Methodology: Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria was recruited for the study after informed consent and explanation about risks and benefits of the procedure. Bleeding complications was determined in transradial or transfemoral access groups undergoing Percutanous Coronary Intervention. The data was gathered through a pre-tested questionnaire after informed consent. Every patient was given an ID, Privacy of the patient was ensured. Post procedure patient was examined immediately for localized swelling, hematoma formation and hemoglobin were assessed. Results: Total 205 patients were included according to the inclusion criteria of the study. Mean age (years) in the study was 53.51 ± 13.97 whereas there were 146 (71.2) male and 59 (28.8) female patients who were included in the study according to the inclusion criteria. Frequency and percentage of localized haematoma among radial and femoral artery was 02 (2.1) and 06 (5.6) respectively and retroperitonial haematoma among radial and femoral artery was 8 (8.2) and 17 (15.7) respectively. Conclusion: The study concluded that common bleeding complications were observed more in femoral artery route then radial artery route. Future studies must be conduct at multiple setups to know the proportion of bleeding complication either in radial or femoral artery route, so that to suggest a uniform protocol for the management of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Techniques and Evidence for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: An Ongoing Journey

Techniques and Evidence for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: An Ongoing Journey

Opinions of cardiologists on class II recommendations in current European Society of Cardiology 2018-2020 guidelines: YELLOW BOX

Objectives: We planned our survey study to evaluate the opinion of cardiologists about the class II recommendations on levels of evidence in the current European Society of Cardiology Guidelines (ESC). Our aim is to determine which diagnosis or treatment option most prefer by cardiologist when guidelines do not make clear recommendations. Methods: The survey was conducted on September 2020 with the participation of cardiologists (n = 102). Our survey covers ESC's guidelines published in 2018-2020 on diagnosis and treatment strategies in coronary artery disease, diabetes, heart valve disease, arrhythmia, dyslipidemia and heart failure. Our survey consisting of 40 questions was shared with the cardiologists via e-mail. Results: Participants answered all of the survey questions. The majority of the participants (79.41%) did not consider the addition of a second long-term antithrombotic medication in addition to aspirin for secondary prevention in diabetes mellitus (DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD) patients who are not at high risk of bleeding. The lowest low density lipoprotein (LDL) value achieved by the participant physicians with treatment in their practices was &amp;lt; 40 mg/dl in 32 (31.37%) participants . One of the striking results of the survey was that 51.96% of the participants stated that it was not possible to measure the lipoprotein a (Lp(a)) level in the center where they were carrying out their practices, and 34.31% did not consider the Lp(a) level in the treatment of dyslipidemia in terms of directing the treatment. As for patients with asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome, 58.82% of the participants considered catheter ablation therapy. Conclusions: Although there were different opinions on some recommendations, the participants were mostly in agreement. We think that these survey results, which were mostly based on expert opinions, may contribute to the guidelines to be published in the future with the increase of survey studies on these issues.

Deficiency of proline/serine-rich coiled-coil protein 1 (PSRC1) accelerates trimethylamine N-oxide-induced atherosclerosis in ApoE−/− mice

AimsThe main therapeutic strategies for coronary artery disease (CAD) are mainly based on the correction of abnormal cholesterol levels; however, residual risks remain. The newly proven gut microbial metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) linked with CAD has broadened our horizons. In this study, we determined the role of proline/serine-rich coiled-coil protein 1 (PSRC1) in TMAO-driven atherosclerosis. Methods and resultsWe first analyzed the levels of TMAO and PSRC1 in patients with or without atherosclerosis with a target LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L. Plasma TMAO levels were increased and negatively associated with decreased PSRC1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Animals and in vitro studies showed that TMAO inhibited macrophage PSRC1 expression due to DNA hypermethylation of CpG islands. ApoE−/− mice fed a choline-supplemented diet exhibited reduced PSRC1 expression accompanied by increased atherosclerotic lesions and plasma TMAO levels. We further deleted PSRC1 in apoE−/− mice and PSRC1 deficiency significantly accelerated choline-induced atherogenesis, characterized by increased macrophage infiltration, foam cell formation and M1 macrophage polarization. Mechanistically, we overexpressed and knocked out PSRC1 in cultured macrophages to explore the mechanisms underlying TMAO-induced cholesterol accumulation and inflammation. PSRC1 deletion impaired reverse cholesterol transport and enhanced cholesterol uptake and inflammation, while PSRC1 overexpression rescued the proatherogenic phenotype observed in TMAO-stimulated macrophages, which was partially attributed to sulfotransferase 2B1b (SULT2B1b) inhibition. ConclusionsHerein, clinical data provide evidence that TMAO may participate in the development of CAD beyond well-controlled LDL-C levels. Our work also suggests that PSRC1 is a negative regulator mediating the unfavorable effects of TMAO-containing diets. Therefore, PSRC1 overexpression and reduced choline consumption may further alleviate atherosclerosis.

Significance of Insignificant Left Main Disease

Significance of Insignificant Left Main Disease

Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Drug-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Prespecified Analysis of BASKET-SMALL 2.

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are an established treatment strategy for coronary artery disease. Randomized data on the application of DCBs in patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are limited. We evaluated the impact of clinical presentation (ACS versus chronic coronary syndrome) on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing DCB or drug-eluting stent (DES) treatment in a prespecified analysis of the BASKET-SMALL 2 trial (Basel Kosten Effektivitäts Trial-Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Drug-Eluting Stents in Small Vessel Interventions). BASKET-SMALL 2 randomized 758 patients with small vessel coronary artery disease to DCB or DES treatment and followed them for 3 years regarding major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization). Among 758 patients, 214 patients (28.2%) presented with an ACS (15 patients [7%], ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction; 109 patients [50.9%], non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction; 90 patients [42.1%], unstable angina pectoris). At 1-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in the incidence of the primary end point by randomized treatment in patients with ACS (hazard ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.19-1.26] for DCB versus DES) or chronic coronary syndrome (hazard ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 0.67-2.47] for DCB versus DES). There was no significant interaction between clinical presentation and treatment effect (P for interaction, 0.088). For cardiac death (P for interaction, 0.049) and nonfatal myocardial infarction (P for interaction, 0.010), a significant interaction between clinical presentation and treatment was seen at 1 year with lower rates of these secondary end points in patients with ACS treated by DCB. At 3 years, there were similar major adverse cardiac event rates throughout groups without significant interaction between clinical presentation and treatment (P for interaction, 0.301). All-cause mortality was higher in ACS compared with chronic coronary syndrome; however, there was no difference between DCB and DES irrespective of clinical presentation. In this subgroup analysis of the BASKET-SMALL 2 trial, there was no interaction between indication for percutaneous coronary intervention (acute versus chronic coronary syndrome) and treatment effect of DCB versus DES in patients with small vessel coronary artery disease. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01574534.

Innovative Approaches to Assess Intermediate Cardiovascular Risk Subjects: A Review From Clinical to Metabolomics Strategies.

Current risk stratification strategies for coronary artery disease (CAD) have low predictive value in asymptomatic subjects classified as intermediate cardiovascular risk. This is relevant because not all coronary events occur in individuals with traditional multiple risk factors. Most importantly, the first manifestation of the disease may be either sudden cardiac death or acute coronary syndrome, after rupture and thrombosis of an unstable non-obstructive atherosclerotic plaque, which was previously silent. The inaccurate stratification using the current models may ultimately subject the individual to excessive or insufficient preventive therapies. A breakthrough in the comprehension of the molecular mechanisms governing the atherosclerosis pathology has driven many researches toward the necessity for a better risk stratification. In this Review, we discuss how metabolomics screening integrated with traditional risk assessments becomes a powerful approach to improve non-invasive CAD subclinical diagnostics. In addition, this Review highlights the findings of metabolomics studies performed by two relevant analytical platforms in current use–mass spectrometry (MS) hyphenated to separation techniques and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) –and evaluates critically the challenges for further clinical implementation of metabolomics data. We also discuss the modern understanding of the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and the limitations of traditional analytical methods. Our aim is to show how discriminant metabolites originated from metabolomics approaches may become promising candidate molecules to aid intermediate risk patient stratification for cardiovascular events and how these tools could successfully meet the demands to translate cardiovascular metabolic biomarkers into clinical settings.

A Case Series of Eight Coronary Artery Perforations and a Review of the Up-to-Date Literature

Percutaneous coronary intervention has become a fundamental diagnostic and treatment strategy in coronary artery disease. Much like any procedure, it is not without risk; in fact, a rare but life-threatening complication as a result of percutaneous coronary intervention is coronary artery perforations (CAP). The risk of CAPs correspondingly rises in relation to the difficulty of the procedure, location of lesion, and complexity of anatomy. It follows then that early recognition and instigation of an appropriate treatment strategy is key in reducing the mortality and morbidity associated with CAPs. The authors present eight case reports of varying difficulties, their analogous management, and a literature review of management approaches in treating CAPs in order to provide a review of management strategies and to highlight the importance of immediate recognition of a potentially fatal complication.

Effect of diabetic kidney disease on therapeutic strategies for coronary artery disease: ten year follow-up.

Background: The best treatment for coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with type 2 diabetes (DM2) and chronic kidney disease is unknown.Methods: This retrospective study included MASS registry patients with DM2 and multivessel CAD, stratified by kidney function. Primary endpoint was combined of mortality, myocardial infarction, or additional revascularization.Results: Median follow-up was 9.5 years. Primary endpoint occurrences among strata 1 and 2 were 53.4% and 40.7%, respectively (P=.020). Mortality rates were 37.4% and 24.6% in strata 1 and 2, respectively (P<.001). We observed a lower rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (P=.027 for stratum 1 and P<.001 for stratum 2) and additional revascularization (P=.001 for stratum 1 and P<.001 for stratum 2) for those in the surgical group. In a multivariate analysis, eGFR was an independent predictor of MACE (P=.034) and mortality (P=.020).Conclusions: Among subjects with DM2 and CAD the presence of lower eGFR rate was associated with higher rates of MACE and mortality, irrespective of treatment choice. CABG was associated with lower rates of MACE in both renal function strata. eGFR was an independent predictor of MACE and mortality in a 10-year follow-up.

Clinical Impact of Pre-Procedural Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Recipients.

The clinical relevance of as well as the optimal treatment strategy for coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS) are unclear. Current data are conflicting, and mainly derived from high-risk patients. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of complete revascularization prior to TAVR for severe AS in low- and intermediate-risk patients. We enrolled 449 patients at low (STS score < 4%) and intermediate risk (STS score 4–8%) undergoing TAVR for severe AS and investigated the influence of recent (<3 months) and prior (>3 months) complete revascularization on clinical outcome. Primary study endpoint was all-cause mortality. Overall, 58% of patients had no or non-significant CAD; 18% had a history of complete revascularization prior to TAVR and 24% had complete revascularization shortly before TAVR. Two-year all-cause mortality was not different between patients with recent revascularization prior to TAVR and patients with no or non-significant CAD (13.7% vs. 14.2%, p = 0.905). Cox regression did not reveal an effect on all-cause mortality for recent revascularization. The present analysis reassures that percutaneous complete revascularization prior to TAVR procedures is neutral in terms of all-cause mortality in patients at low and intermediate surgical risk.

Potential Mechanisms of In-stent Neointimal Atherosclerotic Plaque Formation.

Percutaneous coronary intervention has become the main revascularization strategy for coronary artery disease. Compared with early percutaneous coronary angioplasty and the extensive clinical application of bare metal stents, drug-eluting stents can significantly reduce the stenosis caused by the elastic retraction of plaque and neoatherosclerosis (NA), but there is still a high incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR), which restricts the clinical efficacy of stent implantation. In-stent neoatherosclerosis (ISNA), defined as atherosclerotic lesions in the neointima, is one of the main causes of late stent failure. ISNA plays an important role in stent thrombosis and ISR. The rate of target lesion revascularization and in-stent thrombosis is high when NA arises. Therefore, it is of great clinical significance to explore the occurrence of NA and its development mechanism after stent implantation to prevent ISR and improve stent implantation efficacy and associated clinical prognosis. In this article, we systematically reviewed the existing clinical research on ISNA and the role of optical coherence tomography in its evaluation.

Stop the Divide and Build Coronary Arteries.

Understanding how arteries develop is critical to design repair strategies for coronary artery disease and treatment of arteriovenous malformations. Luo etal. report in Nature that NOTCH drives coronary artery formation by suppressing MYC, a transcription factor involved in cell cycle progression and cell metabolism.