The use of perforated pipes can be seen increasingly in many applications to facilitate drainage/infiltration of liquid through opening channels in the pipe wall. Design of perforated pipes lacks consideration for lateral soil-pipe interaction induced by differential ground movement, which can generate large pipe stresses and strains. In this study, in-air three-point bending tests were conducted on perforated pipes, which were subsequently evaluated through lateral dragging tests. The mechanical responses of perforated pipes with different hole diameters (d), spacings between holes (s), and layers of holes (l) were interpreted. It is found that the load-displacement curves for all tests generally did not show significant difference. The pipe wall thickness had a significant impact on midspan deflection, reflecting by the smallest midspan deflection due to a higher flexural rigidity. All tested perforated pipes were safe, since the maximum pipe strains were well below the linear elastic limit of 3% for polyvinyl chloride (PVC) material. Finally, the efficacy of two prediction methods was assessed. The approach of Cholewa et al. (2009) provided relatively close estimations, while the solution of Ye et al. (2023a) was suitable for use at relatively small pipe end displacements before the mobilization of peak soil resistance.
Read full abstract