Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, And Injuries Research Articles

Evidence-Based Strategies for Injury Prevention and Exercise Prescription in Elderly Communities: The Physical Therapist's Perspective

Injury prevention and exercise prescription are critical components of healthcare for older adults. Physical therapists play a critical role in fall risk screening, assessment, and prevention in elderly communities. By incorporating STEADI (Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries) and other evidence-based tools and resources, physical therapists can help identify and address fall risk factors, link older adults with community-based programs and resources, and reduce the incidence of falls and related injuries in this population. Evidence-based interventions for fall prevention include exercise interventions that are tailored and include a combination of exercise types, considering individual abilities and preferences. Exercise programs can reduce falls in older people living in residential aged care facilities, but exercise has little or no lasting effect on falls after the end of a program. Physical therapists should consider the patient's fall risk, functional limitations, and comorbidities when prescribing exercises for balance and falls prevention. Physical therapists can help elderly communities implement evidence-based strategies for injury prevention and exercise prescription by adopting a person-centered approach, challenging ageist stereotypes, using sound outcome measures, prioritizing physical activity, and collaborating with other healthcare professionals. By doing so, physical therapists can promote the health, independence, and well-being of older adults, and help them lead active, fulfilling lives. A combination of strength, balance, and functional training exercises, as well as other evidence-based strategies, can significantly reduce the risk of falls in elderly communities. Physical therapists and healthcare providers should consider these interventions when developing fall prevention programs for older adults. Exercise interventions for preventing falls in elderly communities should be implemented regularly, with a frequency of at least three sessions per week, and for a duration of up to 12 months. Keywords: Elderly communities, injury prevention, exercise prescription in elderly, falls prevention, aging

Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-up Study (NYC-SIGHT): a nested cross-sectional assessment of falls risk within a cluster randomised trial

BackgroundTo investigate the feasibility of using the Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths and Injuries (STEADI) Falls Risk Tool Kit during community-based eye health screenings to assess falls risk of participants enrolled...

The Effect of the Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries Program on Falls Prevention in Neurosurgical Patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite the negative consequences of falls among neurosurgery patients in acute care settings, there is a lack of high-quality evidence for successful fall prevention programs. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) program on falling prevention compared with routine falling protocol in neurosurgical patients in Jordan. METHODS: A prospective quasi-experimental design was used in this study. The sample comprised 70 neurosurgical patients from a major university-affiliated hospital in Jordan. The study sample was assigned into a control group (35 patients) and an intervention group (35 patients). A demographics questionnaire, and different fall risk screening tools and tests were used in this study as recommended by the STEADI program. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of variance results showed a significant effect (P = .001) of the STEADI program on the linear combination of outcome measures. Independent samples t tests further confirmed the program's effectiveness, with statistically significant mean differences in most outcome measures between the intervention and control groups post intervention. After implementing the study intervention, participants in the intervention group had a statistically significant lower risk for falls. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate potential effectiveness in improving neurosurgery patients' outcomes and reducing the risk of falls. Implementing the study recommendations can enhance patient safety and promote evidence-based fall prevention interventions in neurosurgery patients.

Telemedicine-Based Risk Program to Prevent Falls Among Older Adults: Protocol for a Randomized Quality Improvement Trial.

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) initiative offers health care providers tools and resources to assist with fall risk screening and multifactorial fall risk assessment and interventions. Its effectiveness has never been evaluated in a randomized trial. This study aims to describe the protocol for the STEADI Options Randomized Quality Improvement Trial (RQIT), which was designed to evaluate the impact on falls and all-cause health expenditures of a telemedicine-based form of STEADI implemented among older adults aged 65 years and older, within a primary care setting. STEADI Options was a pragmatic RQIT implemented within a health system comparing a telemedicine version of the STEADI fall risk assessment to the standard of care (SOC). Before screening, we randomized all eligible patients in participating clinics into the STEADI arm or SOC arm based on their scheduled provider. All received the Stay Independent screener (SIS) to determine fall risk. Patients were considered at risk for falls if they scored 4 or more on the SIS or answered affirmatively to any 1 of the 3 key questions within the SIS. Patients screened at risk for falls and randomized to the STEADI arm were offered a registered nurse (RN)-led STEADI assessment through telemedicine; the RN provided assessment results and recommendations to the providers, who were advised to discuss fall-prevention strategies with their patients. Patients screened at risk for falls and randomized to the SOC arm were asked to participate in study data collection only. Data on recruitment, STEADI assessments, use of recommended prevention services, medications, and fall occurrences were collected using electronic health records and patient surveys. Using staff time diaries and administrative records, the study prospectively collected data on STEADI implementation costs and all-cause outpatient and inpatient charges incurred over the year following enrollment. The study enrolled 720 patients (n=307, 42.6% STEADI arm; n=353, 49% SOC arm; and n=60, 8.3% discontinued arm) from September 2020 to December 2021. Follow-up data collection was completed in January 2023. As of February 2024, data analysis is complete, and results are expected to be published by the end of 2025. The STEADI RQIT evaluates the impact of a telemedicine-based, STEADI-based fall risk assessment on falls and all-cause health expenditures and can provide information on the intervention's effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05390736, http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05390736. RR1-10.2196/54395.

Comparing Sensitivity, Specificity, and Accuracy of Fall Risk Assessments in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has implemented the Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) initiative. This initiative provides an algorithm for fall risk screening. However, the algorithm has the potential to overcategorize individuals as high risk for falling upon initial screening, which may burden clinicians with the task of recategorizing individuals after follow-up testing. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of fall risk appraisal between the STEADI, Short Fall-Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), and portable balance system (BTrackS) assessments in community-dwelling older adults. This cross-sectional analysis included 122 community-dwelling older adults, comprising 94 women and 28 men. Center-of-pressure postural sway was assessed using the BTrackS, fear of falling was assessed using the Short FES-I questionnaire, and all participants completed the STEADI checklist. Each assessment categorized participants as either high or low fall risk and fall risk appraisal was compared between groups using McNemar tests. The STEADI checklist (high risk: n = 62; low risk: n = 60) significantly differed in fall risk appraisal compared to the BTrackS (high risk: n = 44; low risk: n = 78; p = 0.014) and the Short FES-I (high risk: n = 42; low risk: n = 80; p = 0.002). Compared to the BTrackS, the STEADI checklist had a specificity of 62.8%, sensitivity of 70.5%, and accuracy of 65.6%. Compared to the Short FES-I, the STEADI checklist had a specificity of 67.5%, sensitivity of 81.0%, and accuracy of 72.1%. The STEADI checklist appears to overcategorize individuals as high fall risk more frequently than direct assessments of postural sway and fear of falling. Further research is needed to examine potential improvements in accuracy when combining the STEADI checklist with direct assessments of postural sway and/or fear of falling.

Integrating Fall Prevention Strategies into EMS Services to Reduce Falls and Associated Healthcare Costs for Older Adults.

The purpose of this study is to detail the implementation of fall prevention initiatives through emergency medical services (EMS) and associated outcomes. Paramedics with MedStar Mobile Healthcare utilized the Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) fall prevention model to screen and direct intervention through 9-1-1 emergency response, High Utilization Group (HUG), and 30-day Hospital Readmission Avoidance (HRA) programs. Outcomes from 9-1-1 calls measured the number of older adults screened for falls and identified risk factors. The HUG and HRA programs measured change in quality of life with EuroQol-5D, referral service utilization, falls, emergent healthcare utilization, and hospital readmission data. Analysis included costs associated with reduced healthcare usage. Emergency paramedics provided fall risk screening for 50.5% (n=45,090) of adults aged 65 and older and 59.3% were at risk of falls, with 48.1% taking medications known to increase the risk of falls. Services provided through the HUG and HRA programs, along with additional needed referral services, resulted in a 37.2% reduction in fall-related 9-1-1 calls and a 29.5% increase in overall health status related to quality of life. Analysis of the HUG program revealed potential savings of over $1 million with a per-patient enrolled savings of $19,053. The HRA program demonstrated a 16.4% hospital readmission rate, in comparison to a regional average of 30.2%, and a cost-savings of $4.95 million or $15,618 per enrolled patient. Implementation of the STEADI model into EMS services provides an effective and cost-saving model for addressing fall prevention for older adults, provides meaningful and impactful improvement for older adults, and could serve as a model for other EMS programs.

MAKING OLDER ADULT FALL PREVENTION A ROUTINE PART OF HEALTHCARE IN TRIBAL CLINICAL SETTINGS

Abstract Over one-third of American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) elders (age 65+) report falling annually. This percentage is higher compared to other race/ethnic groups except for White non-Hispanic older adults. CDC’s Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) initiative provides guidance for making elder fall prevention a routine part of clinical care. The presentation will describe a survey of healthcare providers serving AI/AN populations to gauge their readiness to adopt STEADI. Additionally, it will focus on a culturally informed approach to implementing STEADI within tribal settings. The National Network of Public Health Institutes and Seven Directions, A Center for Indigenous Public Health, surveyed a convenient sample of healthcare providers in clinics serving AI/AN patients to assess providers’ knowledge and acceptability of fall prevention best practices, efforts to prevent falls, and receptiveness to receiving fall prevention training and support. The final sample included 94 healthcare providers from 27 clinics. Less than half of those surveyed reported screening elders for fall risk. Only 22% were familiar with STEADI. Most (84%) providers were willing to take part in fall prevention with additional training. Based on these findings CDC is funding two tribes to use an indigenous evaluation approach to improve their tribal health center’s elder fall prevention capacity through evidence-based clinical and clinical-community linked strategies. Results from these activities will be used to outline a best practices guide focused on coordinated care for fall prevention and tailored to the varied environments, governments, cultures, and capacity for public health action in tribal health centers.

BRINGING COMMUNITY-BASED FALLS PREVENTION PROGRAM TO IMPROVE GLOBAL HEALTH (BRIGHT)

Abstract Older adults in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experience a disparate burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and barriers to accessing health care. Unintentional injuries are among the major NCDs, and falls are the second leading cause of these injuries and deaths. Falls were reported in up to 50% of older people living in Asia, including Thailand. There is a lack of community-based multifactorial fall prevention interventions that target both older adults and the primary care systems. We aimed to culturally adapt the CDC’s Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) for Thai older adults and explore the feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of using STEADI by trained community health workers (CHWs) and care managers (CMs). STEADI consists of three steps: screening, assessing, and intervening. In Step a, CHWs screened fall risk using three key questions and found that all of participants had fall risk, then CHWs screened with a Stay Independent questionnaire (range 0-14) and found that 100% have high fall risk (total scores 9.7± 2.4). In Step b, CMs assessed risk factors and CHWs assessed home hazards. They found that 50% had poor balance, 70% took 4+ medications, 75% fell on the walkway, and 70% had no bathroom modifications. In Step c, individual participants received fall prevention interventions and participants attended all sessions. Our results indicated that STEADI delivered by CHWs and CMs is feasible and acceptable for older adults. The mean scores of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility were 19.20,18.80, and 18.60 out of 20 totals, respectively.

Feasibility of Implementing Patient-Reported and Physical Performance Measures to Identify and Manage Fall Risk in Older Adults Within a Secondary Fracture Clinic.

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of implementing both electronic and in-person assessments to assess falls risk in an older adult secondary fracture clinic. Electronic data capture feasibility was defined as the proportion of patients that completed the electronic questionnaires prior to their clinic visit. In-clinic feasibility was defined in two ways: (1) the proportion of patients that consented to participate at their clinic visit; (2) time to complete testing. Patients were contacted electronically through their health system portal for electronic consent. Patients were invited to complete consent, the STopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) falls risk assessment tool, and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) was performed at the clinic visit. A total of 310 patients were contacted electronically. No patients (0%) provided consent through their health portal. Of the 310 patients, 200 (65%) consented in person (Ineligible: 67 [21%]; Declined: 43 [14%]), resulting in an 82% response rate. In-person data collection took a median of 38.48 (Range: 12.34-54.30) minutes to complete. It was not feasible to contact and collect older adult patient data electronically prior to clinic; but, was feasible to obtain these patient-reported outcomes and physical performance data in person.

Association between self-reported falling risk and risk of hospitalization for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

RationaleThe association between self-report falling risk in persons with COPD and hospitalization has not been previously explored. ObjectiveTo examine whether self-reported risk is associated with hospitalizations in patients with COPD. MethodsA secondary analysis from a prospective observational cohort study of veterans with COPD. Participants completed questions from the Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths and Injuries (STEADI) tool kit at either baseline or at the end of the 12-month study. A prospective or cross-sectional analysis examined the association between responses to the STEADI questions and risk of all-cause or COPD hospitalizations. ResultsParticipants (N = 388) had a mean age of 69.6 ± 7.5 years, predominately male (96 %), and 144 (37.1 %) reported having fallen in the last year. More than half reported feeling unsteady with walking (52.6 %) or needing to use their arms to stand up from a chair (61.1 %). A third were concerned about falling (33.3 %). Three questions were associated with all-cause (not COPD) hospitalization in both unadjusted and adjusted cross-sectional analysis (N = 213): “fallen in the past year” (IRR 1.77, 95 % CI 1.10 to 2.86); “unsteady when walking” (IRR 1.88, 95 % CI 1.14 to 3.10); “advised to use a cane or walker” (IRR 1.89, 95 % CI 1.16 to 3.08). ConclusionsThe prevalence of self-reported falling risk was high in this sample of veterans with COPD. The association between falling risk and all-cause hospitalization suggests that non-COPD hospitalizations can negatively impact intrinsic risk factors for falling. Further research is needed to clarify the effects of all-cause hospitalization on falling risk in persons with COPD.

Nonfatal and Fatal Falls Among Adults Aged ≥65 Years - United States, 2020-2021.

In the United States, unintentional falls are the leading cause of injury and injury death among adults aged ≥65 years (older adults). Patterns of nonfatal and fatal falls differ by sex and state. To describe this variation, data from the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and 2021 National Vital Statistics System were used to ascertain the percentage of older adults who reported falling during the previous year and unintentional fall-related death rates among older adults. Measures were stratified by demographic characteristics, U.S. Census Bureau region, and state. In 2020, 14 million (27.6%) older adults reported falling during the previous year. The percentage of women who reported falling (28.9%) was higher than that among men (26.1%). The percentage of older adults who reported falling ranged from 19.9% (Illinois) to 38.0% (Alaska). In 2021, 38,742 (78.0 per 100,000 population) older adults died as the result of unintentional falls. The unintentional fall-related death rate was higher among men (91.4 per 100,000) than among women (68.3). The fall-related death rate among older adults ranged from 30.7 per 100,000 (Alabama) to 176.5 (Wisconsin). CDC's Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths and Injuries (STEADI) initiative recommends that health care providers screen and assess older adults for fall risk and intervene using effective preventive strategies.

Integrating STEADI for Falls Prevention in Outpatient Rehabilitation Clinics: An Outcomes Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Framework.

The RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework was used to describe the implementation of the Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) Initiative (2018-2021) for screening and assessing all older adults ≥65 years for falls risk across 34 outpatient rehabilitation clinics within a large health system. We described the Implementation process and strategies. Using Electronic Health Records (EHRs), we identified Reach, Adoption, and Maintenance of screenings and physical assessments to identify fall risk among older adults. STEADI Implementation strategies included health system mandates, EHR revisions, email instructions, educational sessions and resources, clinical leads and champions, and chart audits. Reach: 76.4% (50,023) had a completed screening, and 44.1% screened at risk for falls. Adoption: Clinic-level adoption varied, with most performing screenings. Profession-level adoption was highest for physical therapists (PTs; 94.2% initiated, 80.6% completed) and lowest for speech-language pathologists (SLPs; 79.8% initiated, 55.9% completed). Reach and Adoption of functional outcomes measures (FOM): PTs completed an FOM on 59.5% of at-risk patients, occupational therapists on 11.6%, and SLPs on 7.9%. Maintenance: All measures declined 1%-10% annually between 2018 and 2021. STEADI screening and FOMs were implemented systemwide in 34 outpatient rehabilitation clinics, reaching over 50,000 older adults. Screening adoption rates varied by clinic. PTs had the highest adoption rate. All adoption rates declined over time. Future research should consider an implementation science approach with input from key partners before implementation to identify barriers and develop strategies to support STEADI in outpatient rehabilitation.

Special Report from the CDC: Provider knowledge and practices around driving safety and fall prevention screening and recommendations for their older adult patients, DocStyles 2019

Introduction: Falls and motor-vehicle crashes (MVCs) are leading causes of unintentional injury deaths among older adults (65+) in the United States. Injury prevention resources exist to help healthcare providers reduce fall and MVC risk among older adult patients. However, awareness of these resources among healthcare providers is unclear. Methods: Questions were included in the 2019 DocStyles survey that assessed healthcare provider awareness of three injury prevention resources: (1) the American Geriatrics Society’s (AGS’s) Clinician’s Guide to Assessing and Counseling Older Drivers, (2) the Clinical Assessment of Driving Related Skills (CADReS), and (3) the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) initiative. We also explored the circumstances and current practices for counseling older adult patients on fall prevention and driving safety. Results: Only 20% of providers reported awareness of any of the injury prevention resources. Providers were more likely to report either screening for fall risk or unsafe driving when an older adult presented with a fall concern (74.5%) or driving concern or recent crash (85.1%), compared to annual screening for fall risk (67.7%) or driving safety (47.7%). More providers reported discussing the increased fall or MVC risk associated with patient medications, referring patient for driving fitness evaluations, or discussing alternative transportation options with the patient after adverse events or patient-initiated concerns compared to routine annual discussions. Conclusion: Healthcare gaps persist in the screening and assessment of older adult risk factors for falls and unsafe driving. Limited provider awareness of clinical resources related to preventing older adult falls and unsafe driving may be contributing to these healthcare gaps. Practical Applications: Improving healthcare provider awareness of these resources could help them identify older adults at risk of a fall or MVC and promote injury prevention efforts in their clinical practices.

Community Health Workers and Care Managers Implement the CDC’s Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) Program for Older Adults in a Low and Middle-Income Country: A Pilot Study

Community Health Workers and Care Managers Implement the CDC’s Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) Program for Older Adults in a Low and Middle-Income Country: A Pilot Study

Overestimation of Balance Ability Among Older Adults at Risk for Falls.

Objective: This study examined alignment of subjective balance confidence with Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths and Injuries (STEADI) fall risk. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of 155 community-dwelling adults (60 + y/o) from 2016 to 2018 who completed a STEADI fall assessment. Descriptive statistics, Chi-Square analysis, and biserial point correlations were applied. Results: Adults who overestimate balance confidence, 55.6% (n = 50) reported a fall in the past year, 62.2% (n = 56) were worried about falling, 48.9% (n = 44) felt unsteady when standing/walking, and 70.0% (n = 63) had a score of ≥4 on the Stay Independent Questionnaire (SIQ). Physical performance for these adults were mean TUG score 10.9s (SD = 3.4), mean 30 second chair stands 10.8 (SD = 3.5), and mean 4-stage balance score 3.1 (SD = .76). Discussion: Older adults are more likely to overestimate their subjective balance confidence. Individuals are equally likely to have reported a fall in the past year if they were "at fall risk," regardless of their subjective balance confidence.

Developing and Testing Implementation Strategies to support the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Initiative for Falls Risk Management in Outpatient Physical Therapy: A Protocol

ObjectivesTo develop and test implementation strategies to support implementing the Centers for Disease Control and Preventions’ Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) initiative for falls prevention and falls risk management in a novel setting, outpatient physical therapy. DesignA feasibility implementation study engaging key partners involved in or affected by the implementation throughout the study. SettingFive outpatient physical therapy clinics embedded in a health system. ParticipantsKey partners (physical therapists, physical therapist assistants, referring physicians, administrative clinic staff, older adults, and caregivers) involved in or affected by the implementation (N=48) will participate in surveys and interviews to identify barriers and facilitators prior to implementation and post implementation. Twelve key partners representing at least 1 of each group will participate in evidence-based quality improvement panels to identify which barriers and facilitators are most important and feasible to address and to assist in choosing and designing implementation strategies to support the uptake of STEADI in outpatient rehabilitation. STEADI will be implemented in 5 outpatient physical therapy clinics as a standard of care for the ∼1200 older adults attending those clinics annually. OutcomesPrimary outcomes include clinic- and provider-level (physical therapists and physical therapist assistant) adoption and fidelity to STEADI screening, multifactorial assessment, and falls risk interventions for older adults (65 years or older) attending outpatient physical therapy. Key partners’ perceived feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of STEADI in outpatient physical therapy will also be measured using validated implementation science questionnaires. Exploratory clinical outcomes of older adults’ falls risk pre- and post rehabilitation will be investigated.

Utility of performance-based outcome measures (PBOMs) used in fall risk assessment tools for older adults.

This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of different clusters of performance based outcome measures (PBOMs) recommended by two consensus-based guidelines: Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI), and those recommended by a systematic review completed by the American Physical Therapy Association and Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy (APTA-SR, APTA-SR3). 33 community-dwelling older adults (25 females, 8 males) aged mean 79.45 ± 7.64 years participated in this study. Participants completed a fall history questionnaire and were evaluated via a battery of PBOMs for comparative analysis. The diagnostic accuracy of each PBOM cluster was analyzed retrospectively (previous 1 year fall history) and prospectively (6 month follow up). Retrospective analysis revealed the APTA-SR3 had the highest clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy: Sp 88.24% (63.56-98.54), Sn 62.5% (35.43-84.8), LR+ 2.35 (1.22-4.53), LR- 0.19 (0.05-0.73), accuracy 70.22% (51.83-84.81). Prospective analysis revealed the cluster of the APTA-SR and APTA-SR3 had identical diagnostic accuracy: Sn 100% (39.76-100), Sp 43.75% (19.75-70.12), LR+ 1.78 (1.15-2.74), LR- 0 (0), accuracy 60.62% (36.63-81.36). The APTA-SR 3 cluster demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy and in this study was the most effective and efficient group of PBOMs to identify fall risk in community dwelling older adults.

OLDER PRIMARY CARE PATIENTS’ ENGAGEMENT WITH STEADI FALL PREVENTION RECOMMENDATIONS

Abstract The Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) initiative is a CDC-disseminated strategy to provide fall prevention recommendations to high risk patients. However, whether older patients engage with fall prevention recommendations is less clear. The aims of this study were to: 1) describe STEADI fall prevention recommendations provided to eligible older patients; and 2) understand patients’ attitudes, confidence and adherence to recommendations. Fall prevention recommendations were identified by chart review (age ≥65 years old; STEADI score ≥4 (high risk); free of severe cognitive impairment). For those who consented to the study, questionnaires measured recollection (Yes/No), feelings (Positive/Negative), overall confidence to reduce fall risks through the recommendations (0–10 scale; 10 = most confident), and adherence to the specific recommendations (Yes/No). Results showed that 30% (n = 458) of eligible older adults received fall prevention recommendations. Among study participants (n = 182; 69% female, age 80.2 ± 7.7 years, STEADI score 7.0 ± 2.6), 73% reported positive reactions to recommendations. Overall confidence to reduce gait/balance-related fall risks through recommendations was 7.52 (n = 137) with adherence to physical therapy at 70% and tai chi at 38%. Overall confidence to reduce blood pressure-related fall risks through recommendations was 7.45 (n = 55) with adherence to adjusting medications at 89% compared to 69% for compression socks. Participants reported varying levels of adherence despite positive reactions and moderate confidence to reduce their fall risks. Additional research is needed to identify barriers and facilitators to improve adherence.

Preventing Falls Among Older Adults in Primary Care: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Framework.

Falls are a leading cause of injuries and injury deaths for older adults. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Stopping Elderly Accidents Deaths and Injuries (STEADI) initiative, a multifactorial approach to fall prevention, was adapted for implementation within the primary care setting of a health system in upstate New York. The purpose of this article is to: (a) report process evaluation results for this implementation using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework and (b) examine the utility of RE-AIM for assessing barriers and facilitators. This evaluation used mixed methods. Qualitative evaluation involved semistructured interviews with key stakeholders and intercept interviews with health care providers and clinic staff. Quantitative methods utilized surveys with clinic staff. Process evaluation tools were developed based on the AIM dimensions of the RE-AIM framework. The study was conducted over a 2-month period, approximately 18 months postimplementation, and complements previously published results of the program's reach and effectiveness. Primary barriers by RE-AIM construct included competing organizational priorities (Adoption), competing patient care demands (Implementation), and staff turnover (Maintenance). Primary facilitators included having a physician champion (Adoption), preparing and training staff (Implementation), and communicating about STEADI and recognizing accomplishments (Maintenance). Results revealed a high degree of concordance between qualitative and quantitative analyses. The framework supported assessments of various stakeholders, multiple organizational levels, and the sequence of practice change activities. Mixed methods yielded rich data to inform future implementations of STEADI-based fall prevention.

Physical Therapists and Physical Therapist Assistants' Knowledge and Use of the STEADI for Falls Risk Screening of Older Adults in Physical Therapy Practice in the United States.

Fall-risk screening and prevention is within the scope of physical-therapy practice. Prior research indicates United States-based physical therapists (PTs) and physical-therapist assistants (PTAs) use the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s STEADI (Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries) toolkit for community-based fall-risk screenings of older adults. However, clinically based fall-risk screenings and knowledge and use of the STEADI by PTs and PTAs is unknown. We conducted a cross-sectional survey distributed to a convenience sample of PTs and PTAs in the United States through email blasts and social media. PTs and PTAs (N = 425) who responded to the survey and worked in clinical settings with older adults were included. Eighty-nine percent of respondents reported conducting clinical fall-risk screening. Approximately 51% were ‘familiar’ to ‘very familiar’ with the STEADI, and 21.7% of the overall sample were not familiar at all. Only 26.1% utilize the STEADI for clinical fall-risk screening. Of the respondents who were ‘very familiar’ with the STEADI (n = 132, 31.1%), 84.1% (n = 111) reported using the STEADI in clinical practice. Seventy-six percent of respondents who use the STEADI implemented it by choice even though the majority (52.1%, n = 63) did not have it embedded in their documentation/workflow. Some PTs/PTAs can and do manage falls using the STEADI, but there is a gap in knowledge and use of the STEADI for falls management among PTs and PTAs in the United States. Further research is needed to identify the tools PTs use for multifactorial-fall screening and management and the impact of PTs’ use of the STEADI on patient outcomes.