Stool DNA Testing Research Articles

The Utility of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening After a Normal Colonoscopy.

Multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) tests (here, Cologuard®) are currently used in average-risk patients as a primary method of screening for colorectal cancer. However, MT-sDNA testing has also been used in patients who previously underwent colonoscopy who wish to avoid repeat colonoscopy. Here, in a large primary care practice setting, our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MT-sDNA testing in patients with a previously normal colonoscopy. This retrospective cohort study included 5827 patients from 35 different primary locations in South Carolina. Patients aged 45 and above with a previously documented normal, high-quality colonoscopy prior to the MT-sDNA test date were included. High-risk patients and those with a previous negative MT-sDNA result were excluded. Of 5827 ordered MT-sDNA tests, 248 patients had a prior normal colonoscopy. The average time from initial colonoscopy to MT-sDNA testing was 7.3years. Of the 63 patients who had a positive MT-sDNA test, 41 patients (65%) completed follow-up colonoscopy and 40 patients had complete colonoscopy data. Of these 40 patients, 12 patients (30%) had advanced adenomas and none had colorectal cancer. Compared to patients without a previous colonoscopy, patients with prior colonoscopies had fewer adenomas of all types (1.6 vs 2.4) and fewer advanced adenomas (1.4 vs 2.0). Patients with a previously negative colonoscopy and subsequent positive MT-sDNA test were found to have a high rate of advanced adenomas on follow-up colonoscopy (30%). Thus, in patients with a previously negative colonoscopy, MT-sDNA testing may be a reasonable alternative screening option.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Multitarget Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detecting in Thailand.

A multitarget stool DNA test offers high sensitivity and specificity for screening and detecting colorectal cancer (CRC) in Western populations. However, its accuracy in Asian people is not well known. This study aimed to examine the diagnostic performance of multitarget stool DNA tests in Thailand. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2023 to November 2023 at a tertiary university hospital in Bangkok. The study included both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients who underwent stool DNA testing followed by colonoscopy. The multitarget stool DNA test targeted methylation statuses of SDC2, ADHFE1, and PPP2R5C genes. Sensitivity, specificity, and other diagnostic parameters were analyzed. A total of 274 patients (mean age 62.1 years, 60.6% female) were enrolled. CRC was diagnosed in 17.2% of participants and 6.2% had advanced adenomas. The multitarget stool DNA test demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.5% (95% CI: 79.6-97.6) and specificity of 90.3% (95% CI: 85.7-93.8) for CRC detection. Its sensitivity for detecting CRC did not differ between right-sided lesions (92.3%) and left-sided lesions (91.2%) (P=0.901). The sensitivity for detecting CRC lesions size less than 2 cm was significantly lower than for larger lesions (25% vs 91.7%, p<0.001). Notably, the test's sensitivity and specificity for advanced colorectal neoplasms/cancer were 75.0% (95% CI: 62.6-85.0) and 91.9% (95% CI: 87.4-95.2), respectively. Multitarget stool DNA testing is highly sensitive and specific for CRC detection in Thai individuals. This testing could represent as a viable non-invasive alternative to colonoscopy especially in settings where colonoscopy is less accessible or less accepted by patients.

S533 An Analysis of Factors Affecting Follow-Up Colonoscopy in Patients Using Multi-Target Stool DNA Tests: A Multi-Center Retrospective Review

S533 An Analysis of Factors Affecting Follow-Up Colonoscopy in Patients Using Multi-Target Stool DNA Tests: A Multi-Center Retrospective Review

S493 Success of Repeated Orders for Multi-target Stool DNA Testing in Clinical Practice

S493 Success of Repeated Orders for Multi-target Stool DNA Testing in Clinical Practice

S388 An Evaluation of Time to Colonoscopy After Positive Multitargeted Stool DNA Testing

S388 An Evaluation of Time to Colonoscopy After Positive Multitargeted Stool DNA Testing

S427 Cross-Sectional Adherence With the Multi-Target Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Four Largest Payors in the Country

S427 Cross-Sectional Adherence With the Multi-Target Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Four Largest Payors in the Country

S460 Non-Invasive Screening Tests for Colorectal Cancer: Analyzing the Performance of FIT and Multi-Target Stool DNA Test

S460 Non-Invasive Screening Tests for Colorectal Cancer: Analyzing the Performance of FIT and Multi-Target Stool DNA Test

S462 Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes in Patients With History of Non-Colorectal Cancer and Positive Multi-Target Stool DNA Test With Negative Diagnostic Colonoscopy for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia

S462 Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes in Patients With History of Non-Colorectal Cancer and Positive Multi-Target Stool DNA Test With Negative Diagnostic Colonoscopy for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia

S426 Gap Closure Adherence to Multi-Targeted Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Insured Cohort

S426 Gap Closure Adherence to Multi-Targeted Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Insured Cohort

S512 Impact of Spanish Language Outreach on Multi-Target Stool DNA Test Adherence in a Spanish-Speaking Population in a Federally Qualified Health Center

S512 Impact of Spanish Language Outreach on Multi-Target Stool DNA Test Adherence in a Spanish-Speaking Population in a Federally Qualified Health Center

S513 Impact of Spanish Language Patient Navigation on Multi-Target Stool DNA Test Adherence Among Spanish-Speaking Patient Population

S513 Impact of Spanish Language Patient Navigation on Multi-Target Stool DNA Test Adherence Among Spanish-Speaking Patient Population

S458 Impact of Personalized Patient Outreach on Multi-Target Stool DNA Test Adherence in a Large Colorectal Cancer Screening Population

S458 Impact of Personalized Patient Outreach on Multi-Target Stool DNA Test Adherence in a Large Colorectal Cancer Screening Population

Is Noninvasive Next-generation Multitarget Stool DNA Test Useful for Colon Cancer Screening?

Is Noninvasive Next-generation Multitarget Stool DNA Test Useful for Colon Cancer Screening?

Disparities in Rates of Multitarget Stool DNA Test Completion for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

The aim was to assess patient adherence to multitarget stool DNA testing as well as factors associated with adherence. In the United States, disparities in colorectal cancer screening exist along racial and socioeconomic lines. While some studies suggest that stool-based screening tests may help reduce the screening gap, the data for multitarget stool DNA testing is unclear. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study on multitarget stool DNA testing ordered between April 2020 and July 2021. We calculated the proportion of patients who completed testing and used multivariate logistic regression to identify covariates associated with test adherence. Among 797 patients ordered for multitarget stool DNA testing, 481 patients (60.4%) completed testing. Adherence rates by patient subgroups ranged from 35.8% to 78.1%. Higher test adherence was found in Asian patients (odds ratio 2.65, 95% CI 1.36-5.18) and those who previously completed colorectal cancer screening (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.01-2.09), while Black patients (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.87), patients with resident primary care physicians (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21-0.56), and patients contacted through an outreach program (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.87) had lower adherence. A significant proportion of patients ordered for multitarget stool DNA testing did not complete testing. Differences in adherence rates among patient subgroups may be reflective of underlying disparities in health care access.

Stool-based testing for post-polypectomy colorectal cancer surveillance safely reduces colonoscopies: The MOCCAS study.

Colonoscopy-based surveillance to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) causes substantial burden for patients and healthcare. Stool tests may help to reduce surveillance colonoscopies, by limiting colonoscopies to individuals at increased risk of AN. This cross-sectional observational study included individuals aged 50-75 with surveillance indication. Before bowel preparation, participants collected samples for a multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test and two fecal immunochemical tests (FITs). Test accuracies were calculated for all surveillance indications. Only for the post-polypectomy indication, most common and associated with a relatively low CRC risk, long-term impact of stool-based surveillance was evaluated with the ASCCA model. Stool-based strategies were simulated to tune each tests' positivity threshold to obtain strategies at least as effective as colonoscopy surveillance. 3453 individuals had results for all stool tests and colonoscopy. 2226 had previous polypectomy, 1003 previous CRC and 224 familial risk. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for AN were 0.72 (95% CI; 0.69-0.75) for the mt-sDNA test, 0.61 (95% CI; 0.58-0.64) for the FIT OC-Sensor and 0.59 (95% CI; 0.56-0.61) for the FIT FOB-Gold. Stool-based post-polypectomy surveillance strategies at least as effective as colonoscopy surveillance, reduced the number of colonoscopies by 15-41% and required 5.6-9.5 stool tests over the lifetime of a person. Mt-sDNA-based surveillance was more costly than colonoscopy surveillance, whereas FIT-based surveillance saved costs. This study shows that stool-based post-polypectomy surveillance strategies can be safe and cost-effective, with potential to reduce the number of colonoscopies by up to 41%.

Population health outcomes of blood-based screening for colorectal cancer in comparison to current screening modalities: insights from a discrete-event simulation model incorporating longitudinal adherence

Aim Insufficient adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening impedes individual and population health benefits, with about one-third of individuals non-adherent to available screening options. The impact of poor adherence is inadequately considered in most health economics models, limiting the evaluation of real-world population-level screening outcomes. This study introduces the CAN-SCREEN (Colorectal cANcer SCReening Economics and adherENce) model, utilizing real-world adherence scenarios to assess the effectiveness of a blood-based test (BBT) compared to existing strategies. Materials and methods The CAN-SCREEN model evaluates various CRC screening strategies per 1,000 screened individuals for ages 45–75. Adherence is modeled in two ways: (1) full adherence and (2) longitudinally declining adherence. BBT performance is based on recent pivotal trial data while existing strategies are informed using literature. The full adherence model is calibrated using previously published Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) models. Outcomes, including life-years gained (LYG), CRC cases averted, CRC deaths averted, and colonoscopies, are compared to no screening. Results Longitudinal adherence modeling reveals differences in the relative ordering of health outcomes and resource utilization, as measured by the number of colonoscopies performed per 1,000, between screening modalities. BBT outperforms the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and the multitarget stool DNA (mtsDNA) test with more CRC deaths averted (13) compared to FIT and mtsDNA (7, 11), more CRC cases averted (27 vs. 16, 22) and higher LYG (214 vs. 157, 199). BBT yields fewer CRC deaths averted compared to colonoscopy (13, 15) but requires fewer colonoscopies (1,053 vs. 1,928). Limitations Due to limited data, the CAN-SCREEN model with longitudinal adherence leverages evidence-informed assumptions for the natural history and real-world longitudinal adherence to screening. Conclusions The CAN-SCREEN model demonstrates that amongst non-invasive CRC screening strategies, those with higher adherence yield more favorable health outcomes as measured by CRC deaths averted, CRC cases averted, and LYG.

Patient-Provider Communication and Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion Using Multi-target Stool DNA Testing.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening continues to be underutilized in the USA despite the availability of multiple effective, guideline-recommended screening options. Provider recommendation has been consistently shown to improve screening completion. Understanding how patient-provider communication influences CRC screening can inform interventions to improve screening completion. We developed a behavioral theory-informed survey to identify patient-provider communication factors associated with multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) screening completion. The survey was administered by RTI International between 03/2022 and 06/2022 to a sample of US adults ages 45-75 who received a valid order for mt-sDNA screening with a shipping date between 5/2021 and 9/2021. Respondents completed an electronic or paper survey. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient-provider communication factors associated with mt-sDNA test completion. A total of 2973 participants completed the survey (response rate, 21.7%) and 81.6% of them (n = 2427) reported having had a conversation with provider about mt-sDNA testing before the test was ordered. Having a conversation with the provider about the test, including discussions about costs, the need for follow-up testing and test instructions were associated with higher odds of test completion and being "very likely" to use the test in the future. Lack of discussion about advantages and disadvantages of available CRC screening options and lack of patient involvement in CRC screening decision-making were associated with reduced odds of test completion and likelihood of future use. Healthcare providers play a key role in patient adherence to CRC screening and must be appropriately prepared and resourced to educate and to engage patients in shared decision-making about CRC screening.

Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Regarding Colorectal Carcinoma Screening Among Healthcare Personnel.

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is a rising issue worldwide, with high morbidity and mortality rates. It is the third most common cause of death globally. Early diagnosis can lead to prevention and treatment, making it crucial for healthcare professionals to have proper knowledge about CRC screening. This study aimed to assess the level of awareness, identify knowledge gaps, and update the knowledge of healthcare workers. This descriptive cross-sectional study was conductedfrom May to October 2023, in multiple tertiary care hospitals of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Responses were collected manually through a designed proforma of questionnaires. A total of 164 participants (137 male and 27 female) took part in our study. Among the participants, 92.1% (n = 151) were aware that colonoscopy is used for CRC screening. Other screening methods known to them included a fecal occult blood test(FOBT)(65.9%, n = 108), flexible sigmoidoscopy (48.2%, n = 79), stool DNA test (31.1%, n = 51), and virtual colonoscopy (34.1%, n = 56). Only 6.1% (n = 10) routinely recommended CRC screening for all patients, 22.6% (n = 37) recommended it occasionally, and 71.3% (n = 117) rarely or never recommended it. Regarding factors influencing the recommendation of CRC screening, 83.5% (n = 137) cited family history of CRC as the major factor, followed by patient age (68.3%, n = 112), availability of screening facilities (46.3%, n = 76), patient's overall health status (37.2%, n = 61), and patient's preference (20.7%, n = 34). This study concluded that only a small proportion of healthcare personnel regularly recommend CRC screening. In addition, a small proportion are familiar with CRC screening guidelines, although most are well-informed about the various investigations used for screening.

DNA-Stuhltest als Screeningverfahren für kolorektale Neoplasien

DNA-Stuhltest als Screeningverfahren für kolorektale Neoplasien

RETRACTED: Cheng et al. Using Comorbidity Pattern Analysis to Detect Reliable Methylated Genes in Colorectal Cancer Verified by Stool DNA Test. Genes 2021, 12, 1539.

The Genes journal retracts the article "Using Comorbidity Pattern Analysis to Detect Reliable Methylated Genes in Colorectal Cancer Verified by Stool DNA Test" [...].