The Economy of Praise in George Herbert's "The Church" by Parker H. Johnson The first stanza of "Good Friday" brings together in its puns and its rhetorical stance two important elements in Herbert's poetry: the problem of an appropriate poetic response to Christ's suffering and the persistent turn toward economic imagery. The stanza is deceptively simple: O my chief good, How shall I measure out thy bloud? How shall I count what thee befell, And each grief tell?1 Addressing his "chief good," the Christ to whom he owes his salvation, Herbert asks how he can respond in his poetry to Christ's sacrifice. Within this rhetorical context, that of a speaker at a loss for words before the magnitude of another's act, the problem of response becomes a problem of economic transaction, as we can see from the puns on the words "measure," "count," and "tell." These are countinghouse terms; but they also belong to the technical vocabulary of poetry or refer to its intentions. The word "measure" means here to ascertain an amount or quantity; it also refers to a specific unit in prosody or music. The word "count" has three senses: to enumerate, to give an account of. or to scan a verse of poetry. The word "tell" can mean to enumerate or, simply, to speak. Herbert's "Lovely enchanting language" ("The Forerunners ,"!. 19), by means of catachresis, can make economics, in the sense of symbolic exchange, a metaphor for poetry, for Herbert another system of symbolic exchange. The un45 Parker H. Johnson predictable congruencies of language point to legal and mercantile imagery of exchange as a way to explore the difficulty of response to God and the problem of praise. The rhetoric of praise was a highly developed art in Herbert's time. As the Cambridge Orator, Herbert would have known and practiced the topics and figures of classical epideictic oratory.2 Puttenham had assigned the highest position to the praise of the gods on the basis of his classical sources.3 Biblical sources, particularly the Psalms, provided a tradition and rhetoric of praise for the Christian poet; translation, versification, and paraphrase of the Psalms were widespread practices in the period. Calvin'sdefinition ¡sail-encompassing: "Under the word pra/se, however, is comprehended . . . both faith and prayer. . . . Hence it follows, that the whole of spiritual worship is comprehended under what is either presupposed in the exercise of praise, or follows from it."4 Given this weighty tradition and the paramount importance of praise, it is surprising how little of it we actually find in Herbert. We find nothing like the paean of the last six psalms of David in which all creation is called upon to praise God. In these psalms, the preoccupations of complaint and petition are forgotten in a whole-hearted praise of God's glory. With the exception of "Antiphon" (I) and (II), and perhaps a few other poems, most of Herbert's verse is punctuated by the speaker's despair, soul-searching, self-condemnation, prayer, or rejoicing. What we find is a constant meditation on the possibilities and problems of praise, a struggle with the self, and a continual conflict with God over the terms of such praise. Praise of God is Herbert's announced intention at the outset of "The Church." In "The Altar" the speaker's heart is made the site for the sacrifice of praise: Wherefore each part Of my hard heart Meets in this frame, To praise thy Name: That, if I chance to hold my peace. These stones to praise thee may not cease. (11.9-14) 46 PRAISE IN "THE CHURCH" The heart, "Whose parts are as thy hand did frame" (I. 3), is fashioned by God; the heart is also constructed in the frame of the poem — it "Meets in this frame." In "The Altar" we find a reciprocity between God and the speaker: God frames the heart and the heart's frame — this poem — then serves as an altar from which ascends poetic praise. In a cycle of creation and praise, God fashions the stony heart into an altar-poem, and the poem then inevitably praises the greatness of its...
Read full abstract