Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale Research Articles

Dose-Dependent Effects of Botulinum Toxin Type A on Prevention of Postoperative Scars in Various Regions in the Body: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) can improve wound healing and reduce scar formation; however, the exact dose required to prevent postoperative scarring across various anatomical sites remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and optimal concentrations of BTXA for preventing postoperative scarring across various common surgical sites throughout the body. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 46 patients with benign skin tumors received injections of 1, 2.5, or 5U/0.1mL of BTXA or 0.9% saline immediately following surgical tumor excision on both sides of the incisions. Follow-ups were conducted at 7days, 15days, and 1, 3, and 6months postoperatively. Patient-reported adverse events and standardized digital photographs were collected. Scar formation was assessed using the modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (mSBSES). All 46 patients completed the trial without severe complications. The mSBSES scores were higher in the experimental groups at all follow-ups. The 5U/0.1mL BTXA dose group demonstrated optimal scar prevention at all high-risk sites for scar hyperplasia. No significant difference was observed between the 2.5U/0.1mL and 5U/0.1mL doses for intermediate-risk sites, while 1U/0.1mL dose was sufficient for low-risk sites. Overall, 86.5% of patients were satisfied with their treatments, with 16.3% being very satisfied. Early postoperative BTXA injection can reduce or prevent hypertrophic scarring, with optimal doses ranging from 1 to 5U/0.1mL depending on the surgical site, supporting broader clinical application of BTXA. The effectiveness of different concentrations of botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) in preventing postoperative scarring was compared, expanding the scope of previous research, which focused only on the head, face, and neck regions, to include the trunk and extremity areas. Different optimal injection strategies were determined based on different surgical sites and their risks of developing hypertrophic scars. The study demonstrates that BTXA not only reduces scar formation but also enhances patient satisfaction and reduces postoperative itching and pain, contributing to overall better postoperative outcomes. By establishing the efficacy and optimal dosing of BTXA for various surgical sites, this research supports the potential for broader clinical application of BTXA in aesthetic and reconstructive surgeries. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Elliptical excision and primary closure of nasal defect to achieve best esthetic outcome: A case series of 50 patients

Objectives: To evaluate the cosmetic result of nasal of an elliptical excision and primary closure on small nasal defect by using Scar assessment using the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) score. Material and Methods: This retrospective interventional study was conducted in a private clinic over a 2-year duration. Patients aged 18–60 years with nasal defects <1.5 cm were enrolled after obtaining informed consent. Exclusion criteria included immunocompromised status, keloidal tendency, local site infection, bleeding disorder, age <18 years, and lack of consent. Scar assessment using the SBSES was performed at the end of 6 months. Statistical analysis included summary statistics, analysis of variance tests, and a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The study included 50 patients, with 54% males and 46% females. The most common age group was 21–40 years, and melanocytic nevi was the most common cause for excision. Lesions were excised mainly from the lateral wall and dorsum of the nose. The mean SBSES score was 3.79 ± 0.467. The best cosmetic outcome was observed in lesions involving the dorsum followed by the root of the nose. No significant difference was found among the SBSES scores for various subunits. Conclusion: Elliptical excision with primary closure is a simple and effective technique for small nasal defects, providing good cosmetic results. The location of the nasal defect influences the cosmetic outcome, with better results observed in areas with thinner skin and increased skin laxity.

A New Alar Base Reduction Technique in Rhinoplasty.

Alar base reduction is one of the most challenging parts of rhinoplasty because the maneuvers that are performed during this procedure are nearly irreversible. Some of the important complications of alar base reduction are notching, scarring and unnatural results. In this study, we present a modified alar base reduction technique in order to prevent these complications. Seventy-five female patients (46 bilateral and 29 unilateral alar base reductions) who needed alar base reduction were operated on consecutively between January 2016 and June 2022 with this new technique. They were compared retrospectively with 67 female patients (41 bilateral and 26 unilateral alar base reductions) who were operated on consecutively with the classical alar base reduction technique between 2010 and 2015. Scar quality was assessed with a modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (MSBSES). Three people assessed the overall appearance (resulting in naturalness and symmetry) with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Statistically significant differences were found between classical alar base reduction and modified alar base reduction techniques (p<0.05) according to SBSES scores. Also, VAS scores about the result of naturalness were statistically different between the two groups (p<0.05) (Cronbach's alpha value 0.796). There was no significant difference between the VAS scores of the two groups in terms of symmetry (p>0.05) (Cronbach's alpha value 0.828). This new modified alar base reduction technique is found to be useful, easy to apply and has better results than the classical alar base reduction technique. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Role of Triamcinolone Acetonide in the Maturation of Scars.

Surgeons have tried various measures to achieve a minimum and aesthetically appealing scars after wound healing at surgical sites. Various regimens have been recommended to minimize scars both intraoperatively and postoperatively. Our study aims to assess the outcome of the injection of triamcinolone acetonide used intraoperatively on a normal surgical suture line. This is a prospective, observational study of 21 patients (divided into test and control groups with a single scar at the same site) treated with or without injection of triamcinolone acetonide, and outcomes were assessed using Vancouver Scar Scale and Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale. We found a significant difference (P > 0.05) between the median of vascularity, pigmentation, and total score on the Vancouver Scar Scale, whereas there was significant difference between height, color, and overall appearance according to the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale between the test and the control group. We could not find a significant difference in outcome with varying, increasing doses of triamcinolone acetonide. A low dose of triamcinolone acetonide is an effective drug that tends to improve the outcome of a scar in terms of vascularity, pigmentation, height, and overall appearance of the postoperative surgical scar and helps in the maturation of a normal scar.

Prospects for Use of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Prevention of Hypertrophic and Keloid Scars after Surgeries (Meta-analysis)

Abstract Objective To evaluate the possibility of improving and preventing the formation of postoperative hypertrophic and keloid scars using botulinum toxin type A (BTA). Materials and Methods Scientific articles published in English have been systematically screened in PubMed/MEDLINE database over the entire period. The following information about the studies was analyzed: first author surname; year of publication; number of patients; average age; scar location; dosage of the drug administered; follow-up duration; scar assessment methods; results, incidence of hypertrophic and keloid scars formation. The odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated for each of the estimated parameters. The statistical heterogeneity of publications assessed using the criteria of chi-square test and I 2. The differences were considered significant at p &lt; 0.05. Results A total of 18 prospective randomized studies were selected for evaluation, containing data on the use of BTA in 363 cases. Patients receiving botulinum toxin had a lower Vancouver scar scale index, higher visual analog scale index, and higher Stony Brook scar evaluation scale score. The use of BTA reduces the risk of perceptible scar formation, the incidence of hypertrophic and keloid scars. Conclusion The use of BTA to obtain imperceptible scar and prevent hypertrophic and keloid postoperative scars demonstrates good prospects. However, there is no consensus regarding the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the positive effect of BTA on the prevention of hypertrophic and keloid scars.

Octyl-2-cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive Closure Versus Subcuticular Suture for Post-Auricular Incisions.

Skin closure techniques in otolaryngology vary based on surgeon preference and wound site. Octyl-2-Cyanoacrylate may be a safe, rapid, and cost-effective option for post-site closure. This randomized controlled trial study aimed to compare Octyl-2-Cyanoacrylate and conventional subcuticular sutures in ear surgeries, assessing wound closure results in both case and control groups. This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study was conducted at Ohud Hospital from May 2021 to May 2022. Ear surgery and cochlear implantation in patients were examined, and each group was randomly assigned to receive Dermabond TM and deep layer subcuticular sutures closure. Incisions were assessed at various time points, including 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year post-surgery. The patient and observer Scar Assessment Scale was used, and two independent ear surgeons used the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale for initial scar assessment. This study involved 126 ear surgery and cochlear implantation patients randomized to use cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive or subcuticular suture for port site closure. The study found that tissue adhesive (OCA) was faster and more efficient than standard sutures, saving an average of 12 min per incision in each ear. Incision cosmesis showed immediate results and significant differences, and patient satisfaction with OCA wound closure was higher than standard sutures. The findings confirmed that cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive significantly reduced the time needed for skin closure during ear surgery and showed immediate cosmetic improvements without any documented instances of bleeding, hematoma, infection, or wound separation. This is a randomized controlled trial, it follows Level 2 of evidence. Randomized trial or observational study with dramatic effects Laryngoscope, 134:4036-4041, 2024.

Scar Outcome in Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip Repair: A Comparative Analysis of Vertical Lip Lengthening Strategies Using the Rotation-Advancement Concept.

To assess the differences in scar outcomes between modified rotation-advancement techniques proposed by Drs. Mohler and Noordhoff, designed to address issues such as inadequate vertical lip length and scarring on the upper third of the lip in the original rotation-advancement technique. Retrospective single-surgeon (RD) study. Consecutive non-syndromic children (n = 68) with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Modified Mohler (columellar backcut reconstructed with C flap; n = 34) and modified Noordhoff (lower, medially-created backcut reconstructed with laterally-based triangular skin flap; n = 34) repairs. Using 12-month postoperative frontal photographs, scar evaluations (overall and superior, middle, and inferior portions of the lip) were appraised by an assessment panel composed by independent professional and nonprofessional raters employing four validated qualitative scar assessment scales: Manchester Scar Scale, modified Scar-Rating Scale, Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale, and Visual Analog Scale. Quantitative computerized photogrammetric scar widths of the superior, middle, and inferior portions of the upper lip were also measured. The modified Noordhoff method showed significantly (all P < .001) better scar quality for the overall scar and superior portion of the scar in all four scales compared to the modified Mohler method, with no significant (all P > .05) difference for the middle and lower portions. No significant difference (all P > .05) was observed for photogrammetric scar width measurements. The modified Noordhoff technique provided better qualitative results for unilateral complete cleft lip-related scars compared to the modified Mohler technique.

Analysis of trends and status of evaluation methods in thyroid scar

BackgroundThe incidence of thyroid cancer has increased over the decades, and patients prefer short thin scars after thyroidectomy due to their cosmetic visibility. Several scar assessment methods have been used to determine the most cosmetically optimal surgical method, but a widely accepted measurement tool is still lacking. This study investigates the usage status in the thyroid scar scale according to time, region, and study method. MethodsThe authors searched for articles on thyroid scars published between January 2000 and September 2022 in the PubMed database. The study included clinical studies that mentioned thyroid scar and scar scale, excluding articles that did not evaluate neck scars. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 29. ResultsA total of 35 studies were included. Among them, 17 used the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), 17 used the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), four used the Manchester Scar Scale (MSS), and four used the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES). VSS and POSAS were the most commonly used scar evaluation methods. VSS tended to be used frequently in Asia, while POSAS was used frequently in Europe and in randomized controlled trials. ConclusionVSS and POSAS are popular thyroid scar assessment methods, with regional variations. Standardization is needed for meaningful comparisons. Patient's subjective evaluations should be considered, given the cosmetic importance of thyroid scars.

A new dressing system for accelerating wound recovery after primary total knee arthroplasty: a feasibility study.

Currently, postoperative wound infection and poor healing of total knee arthroplasty have been perplexing both doctors and patients. We hereby innovatively invented a new dressing system to reduce the incidence of postoperative wound complications. We enrolled 100 patients who received primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty and then applied the new dressing system. The data collected included the number of dressing changes, postoperative hospital stay, Visual Analogue Scale score (VAS), the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), ASEPSIS scores, The Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES), wound complications, dressing cost, the frequency of shower and satisfaction. Subsequently, a statistical analysis of the data was performed. Our findings demonstrated the average number of postoperative dressing changes was 1.09 ± 0.38, and the average postoperative hospital stay was 3.72 ± 0.98 days. The average cost throughout a treatment cycle was 68.97 ± 12.54 US dollars. Collectively, the results of VAS, KSS, and KOOS revealed that the pain and function of patients were continuously improved. The results of the four indexes of the ASEPSIS score were 0, whereas the SBSES score was 3.58 ± 0.52 and 4.69 ± 0.46 at two weeks and one month after the operation, respectively. We observed no wound complications until one month after the operation. Remarkably, the satisfaction rate of the patients was 91.85 ± 4.99% one month after the operation. In this study, we invented a new dressing system for surgical wounds after total knee arthroplasty and further confirmed its clinical feasibility and safety. ChiCTR2000033814, Registered 13/ June/2020.

Study on the management of granulation during surgery for congenital preauricular fistula infection stage

Objective:To investigate the management of granulation tissue during surgery for infected congenital preauricular fistula and to assess the surgical outcomes. Methods:To summarize the surgical methods and the treatment of granulation methods in 140 cases of congenital preauricular fistula during the period of infection treated in our department from January 2018 to September 2022. The study divided patients into an observation group （79 patients） undergoing fistulectomy without granulation treatment, and a control group （61 patients） where fistulectomy and granulation resection were performed concurrently.. After six months of follow-up, the wound healing, recurrence rates, and the aesthetic assessment of granulation healing were evaluated using the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale（SBSES）. Results:The two surgical approaches were applied to a total of 140 patients with infected congenital preauricular fistula. There was no statistical difference in wound healing and recurrence rates between the observation group and the control group. However, the observation group exhibited smaller scars. Conclusion:In cases of infected congenital preauricular fistula, surgical removal without excising granulation tissue is feasible, leading to effective healing and lesser scar formation.

Psychometric Performance of the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale and SCAR-Q Questionnaire in Dutch Children after Pediatric Surgery.

Introduction: The growing population of survivors following pediatric surgery emphasizes the importance of long-term follow-up. The impact of surgical scars on daily life can be evaluated through patient-reported outcome measurements. The Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) and SCAR-Q questionnaire are two interesting instruments for this purpose. We evaluated their psychometric performance in Dutch children after pediatric surgery. Methods: After English-Dutch translation, we evaluated-following the COSMIN guidelines-the feasibility, reliability (internal and external), and validity (construct, criterion, and convergent) of the SBSES and SCAR-Q in Dutch patients < 18 years old with surgical scars. Results: Three independent observers completed the SB for 100 children (58% boys, median age 7.3 (IQR 2.5-12.1) years) in whom surgery had been performed a median of 2.8 (0.5-7.9) years ago. Forty-six of these children (61% boys, median age 12.1 (9.3-16.2) years) completed the SCAR-Q. Feasibility and internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha > 0.7) was good for both instruments. For the SB, external reliability was poor to moderate (interobserver variability: ICC 0.46-0.56; intraobserver variability: ICC 0.74). For the SCAR-Q, external reliability was good (test-retest agreement: ICC 0.79-0.93). Validity tests (construct, criterion, and convergent) showed poor to moderate results for both instruments. Conclusions: The Dutch-translated SBSES and SCAR-Q showed good feasibility and internal reliability. External reliability and validity were likely affected by differences in conceptual content between the questionnaires. Combining them would provide insight in the impact of scars on patients. Implementation of these instruments in longitudinal follow-up programs could provide new insights into the long-term psychological outcome after pediatric surgery.

Comparison of full-thickness skin graft and punch grafting in the reconstruction of plantar defects.

Acral melanoma commonly occurs on weight-bearing areas of the sole. Reconstruction of such areas presents a surgical challenge due to limited availability and mobility of local skin. Thus, we aimed to compare the scar outcome of full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) and punch grafting in the reconstruction of plantar defects after melanoma surgery. We retrospectively reviewed six patients who underwent both FTSG for nonweight-bearing areas and punch grafting for weight-bearing areas. We compared results of FTSG and punch grafting within the same patient. Photos of completely healed scars were graded using the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES). The averages of the FTSG scores and the punch graft scores, as measured by the SBSES, were statistically compared. Punch grafting yielded a better outcome than FTSG, according to the SBSES. The average of the punch grafting scars was 4.67, which was significantly greater (p = 0.004) than that of FTSG scar scores at 1.83. For weight-bearing areas, punch grafting should be considered as the first option of reconstruction, with FTSG as a second option for nonweight-bearing areas. Overall, this combined approach provides an effective and safe method for reconstruction of extensive plantar wounds.

Modified Alar Base Reduction: A Novel Technique.

Alar base reduction (ABR) surgery is one of the rhinoplasty techniques used to reduce alar flaring, nasal base width, or both. It is crucial for rhinoplasty surgeons to understand and analyze the type of nasal base deformity to achieve satisfactory results and avoid complications. The objective of this study is to describe a novel technique of ABR that addresses alar flaring while avoiding violation of the nostril marginal rim. This prospective cohort study included patients with alar flaring who underwent rhinoplasty or septorhinoplasty with ABR using our modified technique. Demographic data, clinical history, aesthetic concerns, and preoperative and postoperative photographs were collected for each patient. The surgical outcome was assessed using subjective scar evaluation scores at 3 and 6 months, the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale at 6 months, and an overall appearance satisfaction score. A total of 8 patients were included in the study. Subjectively, the majority of patients (75%) reported satisfactory scar appearance at the 6-month follow-up. The mean Stony Brook score was 4.7 (SD=0.74). Nostril symmetry was achieved in all patients. Seventy-five percent of the participants expressed satisfaction with the overall appearance. Our modified ABR technique demonstrates promising results in correcting alar flaring while achieving nostril symmetry with an acceptable scar. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed to evaluate the feasibility of the technique and compare it to other classical techniques. Level IV.

Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes Between Totally Extraperitoneal and Lichtenstein Repair of Inguinal Hernia: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Background: Surgical repair of inguinal hernia is among the most commonly performed surgical interventions in general surgery clinics, with minimal postoperative complications, less pain, and maximum cosmetic results. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent Lichtenstein repair (LR), which is currently the most commonly used open surgical procedure to repair inguinal hernias, and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair with regard to postoperative cosmesis, patient satisfaction, pain, and inflammatory response. Patients and Methods: The study consisted of male patients 18-65 years of age, who were operated for inguinal hernia with two different methods between February 2022 and January 2023 in the general surgery clinic of Elazig Fethi Sekin City Hospital. C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell, and interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels were observed to evaluate the inflammatory response in all patients. Visual Analog Scale and Verbal Rating Score systems were used to monitor the response to pain in the postoperative period. In addition, both groups were evaluated for patient satisfaction in cosmetic terms using the Vancouver Scar Scale and the Modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale. Results: Postoperative pain sensation in the TEP group was found to be significantly lower compared to the LR group. In terms of inflammatory response, IL-6 and CRP levels were found to be significantly higher in the LR group on postoperative day 1 and 2. Satisfaction with the cosmetic appearance of the surgical scar was significantly higher in the TEP group. Conclusion: TEP, which is a laparoscopic hernia repair method, is a safe surgical technique that can be preferred, especially in patients with less postoperative pain and higher cosmetic expectations. In terms of inflammatory response, significant difference is also in favor of TEP repair.

Facial scars resulting from a transbuccal approach during osteosynthesis of a sagittal split osteotomy: A retrospective study

The purpose of the current study was to assess the quality of facial linear scars. The Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) was developed and validated as a tool to assess postoperative scars.Postoperative facial scars were rated using high-quality macrophotographs and SBSES by three independent raters at baseline and three months thereafter. Percentage agreement (PA) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to measure interrater and intrarater reliability. Scar outcomes ranging from 0 (worst) to 5 (best) were evaluated against age and gender.One-hundred-sixty-six patients with a mean age of 30.6 years (range of 17–59) were included in this study. Forty-four were male (26.5%), and 122 were female (73.5%). Mean total SBSES scores were 4.63 (range of 4.56–4.76) at baseline and 4.60 (range of 4.54–4.72) at three months. As patient's age increased, mean total SBSES scores also decreased significantly (r = −0.216, p = 0.005). Gender did not significantly affect raters’ perception of scar cosmesis (p = 0.847). Interrater reliability showed an ICC of 0.675 (95% CI, 0.609–0.731) and a PA of 65.4% at baseline, and an ICC of 0.655 (95% CI, 0.585–0.715) and a PA of 64.2% at three months. Intrarater reliability found ICCs ranging from 0.988 to 0.990 and a PA of 96.8% with 3 separate raters.Within the limitations of the study it seems that the transbuccal approach during osteosynthesis of a sagittal split osteotomy seems still to be acceptable when the patient gives his or her informed consent and advanced instruments like an angled screwdriver are not available.

Comparison of scar outcomes of alar base and columella using irradiated polyglactin 911: a single-blind study

Aim: The formation of scars on the face after open septorhinoplasty (SRP) with alar base reduction may disturb the patient due to cosmetic concerns. This study aimed to compare scar outcomes of the columella and alar base in patients undergoing SRP.&#x0D; Material and Method: Twenty-seven patients who underwent alar base reduction during primary open SRP were divided into two groups according to the intervened area as the Columella (CLM) group (n=27) and the Alar Base (AB) group (n=27). Irradiated polyglactin 911 was used in all patients. The modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) and a questionnaire form were used to measure scar outcomes and patient satisfaction. Columellar and alar base scar outcomes were compared.&#x0D; Results: Patient satisfaction and scar outcomes were better in the CLM group. There was no significant difference, except for the first month total SBSES scores, between the CLM and AB groups. There was no significant difference in patient questionnaire scores between groups. In the early period, there were more signs of inflammation in the alar base than in the columella, without statistical significance.&#x0D; Conclusion: Patient satisfaction and scar outcomes in the columellar area were favorable. Scar outcome on the alar base was statistically significantly worse than columella in the early period. There was no statistically significant difference between both areas in the long-term. Irradiated rapid vicryl can be used for closure of the alar base and columella, considering its advantages and disadvantages, in patients undergoing open septorhinoplasty with alar base reduction.

A New Dressing System for Wound in Enhanced-Recovery Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized and Controlled Trial

BackgroundCurrently, there is a paucity of recommendations in regards to dressing selection within the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. We devised a new dressing system to accelerate the recovery after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We aimed to present our experience with this new dressing system as an adjunct to wound management in THA and to evaluate its performance. MethodsFrom September 2020 to August 2021, we prospectively enrolled 124 patients who underwent a primary THA. The patients were randomly assigned to the intervention (the new dressing system group) or the control (the traditional gauze dressing) group. The primary outcome measures of this study were numbers of dressing changes, postoperative lengths of stay, wound scores including the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale and ASEPSIS scores and wound-related complications. The secondary outcomes include satisfaction scores, dressing-related costs, and pain and functional recovery scores. ResultsThe intervention group numbers of dressing changes and postoperative lengths of stay were significantly less than the control group (P < .001, P < .001). During the one-month follow-up, the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale in the intervention group was significantly better than that in the control group (P < .001). The intervention group satisfaction was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of dressing-related costs and pain and function scores. ConclusionThe new dressing system could significantly reduce the number of dressing changes and postoperative lengths of stay and increase patient satisfaction scores, which can be an ideal adjunct to wound management in enhanced-recovery THA.

Subjective scar assessment scales in orthopaedic surgery and determinants of patient satisfaction: A systematic review of the literature

PurposeScar assessment tools can be utilized during the post-operative period to monitor scar progress. The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate current subjective scar assessment scales utilized in orthopaedic surgery. The secondary aim was to identify determinants of patients’ satisfaction with their scars and evaluate current measurement scales. MethodsThe preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses checklist was followed. Electronic databases, currently registered studies, conference proceedings and the reference lists of included studies were searched. There were no constraints based on language or publication status. A narrative synthesis provided a description and evaluation of scales utilized in orthopaedic surgery. Determinants of patient satisfaction were identified along with the scales used to measure satisfaction. ResultsA total of 6059 records were screened in the initial search. Twenty-six articles satisfied the inclusion criteria, assessing 7130 patients. In the literature, six validated subjective scar scales were identified, including the Vancouver scar scale, patient and observer scar assessment scale, Manchester scar scale, Stony Brook scar evaluation scale, visual analogue scale, and Hollander wound evaluation scale. Studies utilizing these scales to evaluate scars following orthopaedic procedures did so successfully. These were total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, and limb reconstruction. The scales demonstrated satisfactory validity. Functional outcomes such as restoration of movement ranked among patients' highest concerns. Scar cosmesis was found to be amongst patients’ lowest priorities. ConclusionsSubjective scar assessment scales identified in the literature were not designed specifically for orthopaedic surgery. However, these were able to appropriately assess scars in the studies identified in this review. Current evidence suggests the effect of scar cosmesis on patient satisfaction with orthopaedic procedures is limited.

Functional and Aesthetic Outcome of Macgregor and Z Plasty (Step Ladder) Approach for Lip Splitting in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

The aim of the study is to compare the functional and esthetic results of two lip splitting approaches-McGregor incision and stepladder Z plasty for surgical resection of primary Oral Squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Prospective study involved 24 patients who had modified radical neck dissection for OSCC between 2018 and 2020. Predictor variables were drawn from demographic characteristics (age and gender), primary site, extent of the primary lesion. Patients were divided into two groups randomly with group I McGregor lip splitting incision and group II step ladder Z plasty, with subjective and objective assessment. In the overall comparison of the oral incontinence between the two groups, there was no statistically significant results. Z plasty group had better outcome with lesser degree of drooling and good cosmesis. There was no difference between the speech efficiency between the two groups. Subjective assessment of the appearance of lips and face was better in Z plasty group. Subjective assessment of inversion and eversion was better in McGregor group. Cosmesis was assessed objectively by Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES). Group 1 had a mean score of 2.92 out of 5 and Group II mean score of 4.08 out of 5. Cosmesis was better in Z plasty group. Z plasty was found as a superior option when it comes to cosmesis due to its geometric nature which allows accurate approximation. McGregor offers better functional outcome in terms of lip movement and oral incontinence.

Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection on Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Scars can cause pain, long-term physical dysfunction, and psychological harm. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is one treatment choice for scars, but further evidence is needed to confirm its efficacy. This systematic review included randomized controlled trials that investigated the effectiveness of BoNT-A on scars. The mean and standard deviation for the Vancouver Scar Scale, Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale, visual analog scale for appearance evaluation, visual analog scale for scar pain evaluation, and scar width were extracted for subgroup analysis. Twenty-one randomized controlled trials were included. The BoNT-A group had a lower Vancouver Scar Scale score than the saline group (standardized mean difference, -0.73; 95 percent CI, -1.12 to -0.35; p = 0.0002) but a higher score than the steroid group (standardized mean difference, 0.85; 95 percent CI, 0.27 to 1.43; p = 0.004). The BoNT-A group exhibited a higher Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale grade than the saline group (standardized mean difference, 1.42; 95 percent CI, 0.83 to 2.00; p < 0.00001). The visual analog scale for appearance evaluation revealed higher scores in the BoNT-A group than in the saline group (standardized mean difference, 1.14; 95 percent CI, 0.69 to 1.60; p < 0.00001). As for pain evaluation, the BoNT-A group had a lower visual analog scale score than the steroid group (standardized mean difference, -2.57; 95 percent CI, -4.40 to -0.74; p = 0.006). Furthermore, scar width was significantly shorter in the BoNT-A group than in the control group (standardized mean difference, -1.11; 95 percent CI, -1.38 to -0.83; p < 0.00001). BoNT-A is more effective in treating scars than saline, although steroids may exhibit higher potency. Therefore, it can be considered an alternative in patients not amenable to steroid treatment. Therapeutic, II.