Bile Duct Stones Research Articles

Treatment for recurrent choledocholithiasis: endoscopic? or laparoscopic? A prospective cohort study.

Endoscopic and laparoscopic techniques are crucial for management of bile duct stone. The aim of this study was to share our initial experiences with endoscopic and laparoscopic treatments for recurrent choledocholithiasis, with a particular focus on long-term complications. From January 2014 to June 2017, a total of 153 patients with recurrent common bile duct stones were prospectively recruited in this study. Patients were scheduled for either an endoscopic procedure (ERCP/EST group, n = 84), or a laparoscopic procedure (LCBDE group, n = 69). Data were collected on comorbid conditions, presenting symptoms, bile duct clearance, and the incidence of both short-term and long-term complications. Patients in ERCP/EST group had a stone clearance rate comparable to that of the LCBDE group (94.2% vs 91.7%, p = 0.549). Minor (Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and 2) and major short-term complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3 and above) were similar between patients in two groups (ERCP/EST group 17.9% versus LCBDE group 26.1%, and ERCP/EST group 7.1% versus LCBDE group 5.8%, p = 0.227 and p = 0.740, respectively). Patients in the ERCP/EST group had a shorter stone free interval than patients in the LCBDE group (28.5 ± 14.7months versus 43.3 ± 17.8months, p = 0.029). During a mean follow-up period of 67.0months, more patients in the ERCP/EST group experienced stone recurrence compared to those in the LCBDE group (26.1% vs 11.6%, p = 0.020). In the ERCP/EST group, 45.5% (10/22) of the recurrent cases experienced more than two recurrences, with three patients requiring choledochojejunostomy due to repeated recurrence. Among patients with a non-dilated common bile duct (d ≤ 8mm), both groups had comparable short-term and long-term complication rates (p = 0.151 and p = 0.404, respectively). Laparoscopic treatment is a safe and effective option for patients with recurrent choledocholithiasis, extending the stone free interval, reducing the likelihood of stone recurrence, and highlighting benefits of minimally invasive surgery.

Dilated common bile duct diameter as an indicator of bacteremia in patients with symptomatic common bile duct stones

The optimal timing and selection for blood culture collection in patients with acute cholangitis remains unclear. The relationship between common bile duct (CBD) diameter and the incidence of bacteremia in patients with CBD stones was elucidated. This single-center retrospective observational study included patients with symptomatic CBD stones who presented to the emergency department between January 2019 and December 2021. The primary endpoint was the incidence of bacteremia. The patients were divided into two groups based on bacteremia complications. The patient characteristics and CBD diameters were compared between the two groups to identify factors associated with bacteremia. In total, 270 patients were analyzed, with bacteremia identified in 134 patients (50%), and the median CBD diameter was 10.7 mm (IQR, 8.7-13.7). The CBD diameter was significantly larger in patients with bacteremia (median 12.4 mm [IQR, 9.9-15.7] vs. 9.7 mm [IQR, 8.2-11.7], P <0.001) in univariate analysis. Multivariable analysis revealed that the CBD diameter was significantly associated with bacteremia (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.14-1.38, P <0.010). The area under the ROC curves, representing the diagnostic accuracy of CBD diameter for indicating bacteremia, was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66-0.78) with a cut-off value of 11.2mm. CBD dilation in patients with symptomatic CBD stones is significantly correlated with bacteremia. The CBD diameter cannot be assessed as the sole tool for detecting bacteremia; however, CBD dilation could be an indicator of bacteremia, assisting in the treatment strategy, regardless of the initial severity of cholangitis.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus common bile duct exploration for extrahepatic bile duct stones and postoperative recurrence-associated risk factors

BACKGROUND There remain controversies regarding the surgical treatment of extrahepatic bile duct stones (EHBDSs) in clinical practice. AIM To explore the curative effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) plus common bile duct exploration (CBDE) for the surgical treatment of EHBDSs and to analyze the risk factors that affect postoperative stone recurrence. METHODS Eighty-two patients with EHBDSs admitted between March 2017 and March 2023 were selected. Among them, patients treated with open choledocholithotomy plus LC or open cholecystectomy (OC) were set as the control group (n = 40), and those treated with LC plus CBDE served as the observation group (n = 42). The surgical outcomes of the two groups were compared, the surgical complications and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) scores were counted, and the one-year prognostic recurrence was recorded. Independent factors for postoperative recurrence were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS The two groups were comparable in the stone residual rate (P &gt; 0.05). The operation time (P &lt; 0.05), intraoperative bleeding (P &lt; 0.05), and total complication rate (P = 0.005) were lower in the observation group than in the control group. The observation group exhibited a marked increase in the GIQLI score, which was higher than the control group (P &lt; 0.05). A lower one-year recurrence rate was determined in the observation group vs the control group (P = 0.027). Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction [odds ratio (OR) = 5.712, P = 0.007] and the treatment scheme of open choledocholithotomy plus LC or OC (OR = 6.771, P = 0.008) were the independent risk factors for one-year recurrence in patients after surgery. CONCLUSION LC plus CBDE for patients with EHBDSs can reduce stone residuals, intraoperative bleeding, complications, and postoperative recurrence.

Utility of cholangioscopy in patients with surgically altered anatomy after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage

Background Surgical therapy that alters the biliary anatomy makes endoscopic access to the biliary system difficult. These surgeries promote cholestasis, calculi development and lead to biliary stricture. Stricture resolution and removal of intrahepatic bile duct stones remain challenging. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of prospective data of patients with altered surgical anatomy with intrahepatic bile duct stones/strictures. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) was attempted, followed by transhepatic SpyGlass cholangioscopy for stricture or removal of intrahepatic bile duct stones. The number of sessions, stricture dilatation and complications were noted. A cholangiogram revealing a clear duct was a technical success, and stricture resolution was considered a clinical success. Complete ductal clearance was clinical success in those with stones. Patients with follow-up of a minimum of six months were included. Results Twenty-four patients [16(66.7%) male, median age 41.5(IQR 38.2-49) years] successfully underwent PTBD. The commonest indication was biliary stricture in 13(54.2%), followed by intrahepatic stones in 6(25%) and stones with strictures in 5(20.8%) patients. Most patients had undergone Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy in 22(91.7%), and the level of bile duct obstruction was hilum in 20(83.3%). The median (IQR) total bilirubin levels reduced from 6.6(5.1-8.3) to 1.8(1.2-2.8) mg/dL after PTBD; p&lt;0.001. The technical success was 90.9% after a median (IQR) number of 2(1.7-2) SpyGlass sessions; clinical success was 88.9% after a median of 3(3-4) SpyGlass sessions. Abdominal pain (8.3%) and cholangitis (12.5%) were the complications after cholangioscopy. The median (IQR) follow-up duration was 7(6-8) months. Conclusions SpyGlass cholangioscopy, although challenging, is a safe option for intrahepatic stones and strictures with excellent short-term outcomes and minimal complications.

How I Do It: Simplified Transcystic Antegrade-only Robotic Common Bile Duct Exploration (RCBDE).

Data consistently supports a surgery-first approach to common bile duct (CBD) stones in patients with a gallbladder via laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE). LCBDE has equivalent efficacy and decreased cost as compared with cholecystectomy plus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, adoption has been low due to the technical limitations of laparoscopy. We describe a straightforward and highly reproducible robotic CBDE (RBCDE) technique. A cystic ductotomy is made after obtaining a critical view of safety. Through a 5mm port, a wire-ready cholangiogram catheter is secured in the cystic duct and intraoperative cholangiogram performed. Based on stone burden, small versus large, either an antegrade balloon snowplow (push stones forward) or sphincteroplasty is performed over a wire under fluoroscopy. If concern persists for retained stones, choledochoscopy is performed. Our simplified antegrade-only RCBDE technique allows surgeons to consistently offer a surgery-first, single-stage approach to CBD stones in patients with a gallbladder.

Comparative Success Rate and Adverse Effects of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Versus Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation in Large Common Bile Duct Stones Removal. A Propensity Scores Inverse Weighting Analysis.

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is a standard treatment for common bile duct (CBD) stones. Endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EST-EPLBD) is an effective treatment for difficult CBD stones. This study aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and adverse effects of EST-EPLBD and EST in treating large CBD stones. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 85 patients with large CBD stones who underwent either EST or EST-EPLBD, resulting in successful CBD stone extraction from January 2018 to June 2022. Propensity score inverse weighting was performed to reduce the possible bias in baseline characteristics between the two treatment groups. The success rate of complete stone removal in the first session, mechanical lithotripsy use, and adverse events were analyzed by multivariable risk regression analysis. The rate of complete stone removal in one session of the EST-EPLBD group was higher than that of the EST group at 28.78% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.43, 50.1; p = 0.003). Mechanical lithotripsy use was decreased in the EST-EPLBD group by 25.81% (95% CI 42.33,9.28; p = 0.002). However, the incidence of adverse events is comparable. EST-EPLBD may be utilized in the treatment of CBD stones that exceed a diameter of 10 mm. The EST-EPLBD increased the rate of complete stone removal in a single session and reduced the need for mechanical lithotripsy. Conversely, the incidence rate of adverse events is similar.

Application of EUS or MRCP prior to ERCP in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis in clinical practice

Background: Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis can be stratified according to the 2019 European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline into low-, intermediate- and high-likelihood groups for the presence of choledocholithiasis. For the intermediate group, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is recommended to assess whether an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is necessary prior to cholecystectomy. Objective: The aim of the study is to investigate adherence to the guideline for diagnostic and treatment strategy for cholelithiasis in daily clinical practice. Patients and methods: Multicenter, retrospective cross-sectional observational study of the diagnostic pathway of patients with suspicion of choledocholithiasis between 2019 and 2021. Patients were stratified according to the ESGE guideline "Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones”. Results: A total of 305 patients were included in the analysis and stratified into low- (17%), intermediate- (40%) and high- (43%) likelihood of choledocholithiasis. In these three categories, 182 (60%) patients underwent ERCP. Adherence to the ESGE guideline recommendation was 59.7% overall and was the highest in the intermediate-likelihood group (83.6%), compared to 45.1% in the low- and 43.2% in the high-likelihood group, respectively (p &lt;.001). In the high-likelihood group, 49% underwent additional imaging. In 195 patients who underwent additional imaging, 55 ERCPs (28.2%) could be avoided. Conclusion: This study shows that stratification according to the ESGE guideline is useful to reduce the number of unnecessary additional imaging procedures and ERCPs in patients with a suspicion of choledocholithiasis. It seems worthwhile to perform EUS prior to the ERCP in the same session.

Effect and mechanism of endoclip papilloplasty in reducing the incidence of cholelithiasis.

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is widely used to treat common bile duct stones (CBDS); however, long-term studies have revealed the increasing incidence of recurrent CBDS after EST. Loss of sphincter of Oddi function after EST was the main cause of recurrent CBDS. Reparation of the sphincter of Oddi is therefore crucial. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of endoclip papilloplasty (ECPP) for repairing the sphincter of Oddi and elucidate its mechanism. Eight healthy Bama minipigs were randomly divided into the EST group and the ECPP group at a 1:1 ratio, and bile samples were collected before endoscopy and 6months later. All minipigs underwent transabdominal biliary ultrasonography for the diagnosis of cholelithiasis 6months after endoscopy. The biliary microbiota composition and alpha and beta diversity were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Differential metabolites were analyzed by bile acid metabolomics to explore the predictive indicators of cholelithiasis. Three minipigs were diagnosed with cholelithiasis in the EST group, while none in the ECPP group showed cholelithiasis. The biliary Firmicutes/Bacteroidota (F/B) ratio was increased after EST and decreased after ECPP. The Chao1 and observed species index significantly decreased 6months after EST (P=0.017 and 0.018, respectively); however, the biliary α-diversity was similar before and 6months after ECPP. The β-diversity significantly differed in the EST group before and 6months after EST, as well as in the ECPP group before and 6months after ECPP (analysis of similarities [ANOSIM]: R=0.917, P=0.040; R=0.740, P=0.035; respectively). Glycolithocholic acid (GLCA) and taurolithocholic acid (TLCA) accumulated in bile 6months after EST. ECPP has less impact on the biliary microenvironment than EST and prevents duodenobiliary reflux by repairing the sphincter of Oddi. The bile levels of GLCA and TLCA may be used to predict the risk of cholelithiasis.

VS 09 - HPB Laparoscopic Trans-Cystic Bile Duct Exploration is Safe and Feasible even after previous Cholecystectomy

Abstract Background Laparoscopic trans-cystic bile duct exploration is well know to have less comorbidity that conventional trans-ductal approach. A 56-year-old female underwent emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 2019 for cholecystitis. Subsequently treated conservatively for ascending cholangitis due to large stone in the bile duct on MRCP. She underwent two unsuccessful ERCPs due to anatomical challenges; large hiatus hernia and duodenal diverticulum. The MDT determined bile duct exploration was necessary as no endoscopic options remained. After assessing previous imaging, laparoscopic trans-cystic exploration was chosen to minimise complications. This video highlights the feasibility of laparoscopic trans-cystic CBD post-cholecystectomy. Method Standard four-port technique with 10mm, 30-degree laparoscope. Blunt, sharp, energised and hydro-dissection were employed. Indocyanaine green(ICG) helped identify the bile duct(CBD) and the cystic duct(CD) stump. CD was dissected from the gallbladder bed and opened for a cholangiogram; confirming a large stone in the distal bile duct. A 3.5 mm choledochoscope with electrohydraulic lithotripsy(EHL) was used to explore the bile duct and fragment the stone for extraction. Remaining small fragments were flushed into the duodenum after 20mg buscopan intravenously. Final cholangioscopy and cholangiogram through the choledochoscope showed clear ducts with good flow into the duodenum. Results The patient was started on IV antibiotics due to pyrexia on the first night of admission. The abdominal drain was removed after 48 hours, and the patient was discharged on day three to complete a five-day course of antibiotics. Nine months post-operatively, she presented with a 3x5x7.5 cm sub-hepatic abscess, requiring interventional radiology (IR) drainage and a six-week course of antibiotics. The drain was removed after a follow-up CT scan three weeks post-drainage showed resolution. There have been no further episodes of cholangitis, and she has returned to her baseline quality of life. Conclusion This case shows laparoscopic trans-cystic approach remains viable post-cholecystectomy. Advanced imaging and tools including 3.5mm choledochoscope and EHL aid safer surgery with reduced morbidity, shorter stays and faster recovery. Antibiotics may be necessary for cases with longstanding bile duct stones. Furthermore, this case highlights the importance of intraoperative cholangiography and bile duct exploration. The patient had an MRCP in 2019 that showed no bile duct stones but a dilated CBD associated with deranged LFTs. This suggests that her journey might have been less complicated if a cholangiogram had been performed during the initial laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

HPB SO75 - Burden and Pattern of Gallstone-Related Acute Surgical Admissions

Abstract Background Gallstone disease accounts for nearly one-third of emergency general surgery admissions, with a considerable number resulting from recurrent episodes. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the only definitive treatment for gallstones. This study aimed to examine the burden and patterns of acute biliary admissions. Method This prospective cohort study was conducted over a continuous 12-week period in 2022 within a single surgical unit, focusing on all gallstone-related admissions. The total number of admissions for various surgical pathologies was documented, and the proportion due to biliary disease was determined. The analysis encompassed patient demographics, reasons for biliary admission, prior gallstone history, and any planned laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC). Results There were 532 acute admissions, 98 (18.4%) were gallstones related. Median age was 62 years (IQR 47-72) and 58 (59.2%) were female. 40 (40.8%) had acute cholecystitis, 24 (24.5%) had gallstone pancreatitis, 16 (16.3%) had bile duct stones, 10 (10.2%) had biliary colic and 8 (8.2%) had ascending cholangitis. 43 (43.9%) patients were known to have gallstones and 26 (26.5%) patients had prior admission related to gallstones. 35.7% patients had outpatient LC, 23.5% had no documentation, 19.4% had inpatient LC, 18.4% were not fit candidates and 3.1% patients declined LC. Median total length of stay was 6 days (IQR 4-11). Conclusion In our study, the rate of biliary-related admissions was lower than previously reported in the literature. This reduction may be attributed to our semi-aggressive management approach for gallstone disease. To further improve patient outcomes, we suggest implementing more aggressive management strategies for gallstones during the initial admission for patients who are deemed fit for surgery. Such an approach could potentially reduce the recurrence of biliary admissions and enhance overall treatment efficacy.

BN O04 - Trends in the management of bile duct stones in the United Kingdom: Are we following the evidence?

Abstract Background Common bile duct stones (CBDS) are typically managed in two stages: Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). However, access to ERCP can be limited or require referral, has a high failure rate, often necessitates additional imaging, and may involve multiple procedures. Increasing evidence suggests that single-stage management, involving LC with intraoperative imaging and bile duct exploration when indicated, is cheaper, more effective, and reduces overall length of stay. British Society of Gastroenterology guidance states that it is a valid alternative to ERCP. This study aimed to determine whether clinical practice aligns with this evidence. Method National Health Service (NHS) Admitted Patient Care publications summarise Hospital Episode Statistics by financial year and are openly accessible. OPCS4 Procedure Codes were screened by two authors and categorised as “operative” or “endoscopic.” Codes detailing the management of CBDS or bile duct exploration were included, while ambiguous codes or those for non-stone indications were excluded. Data pertaining to these codes were extracted from the Admitted Patient Care publications for 2012 to 2022 and summarised in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Trends were analysed using a Non-Seasonal Mann-Kendall Trend Test Results A total of 249,475 procedures for CBDS were performed over the ten-year period, with a mean patient age of 67. Annually, the total number of procedures increased from 21,365 to 27,668 (p=0.002). Endoscopic procedures increased from 19,716 to 25,976 (p=0.002), while operative procedures remained stable (1,649 to 1,692, p=0.431). Consequently, the proportion of endoscopic management rose from 92.3% to 93.9% (p&amp;lt;0.001). The mean age of patients undergoing operative procedures was ten years younger than those undergoing endoscopic procedures (57 vs. 67 years) Conclusion Despite evidence and guidance supporting single-stage procedures, there is a trend towards endoscopic management of CBDS in the UK. This may be due to operational pressures on the NHS, including the sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic, or reflect challenges within hospital culture, skill mix, or equipment availability.

HPB SO70 - Evaluating the Outcome of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Against Key Performance Indicator (KPI) of the British Benign Upper GI Surgical Society (BBUGSS)

Abstract Background Treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stone(s) can be challenging with a risk of significant complications. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) displays superior outcomes when compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Acknowledging the impact of patient variables and surgical proficiency, the British Benign Upper GI Surgical Society (BBUGSS) developed Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to optimize LCBDE outcomes. The present study comprises an audit of LCBDE outcomes with respect to the BBUGSS KPIs and aims to determine the feasibility and quality of LCBDE that can be achieved in a district general hospital (DGH) with a recently developed LCBDE service. Method This retrospective observational study examined all adult patients who underwent LCBDE between August 2022 and June 2024 by two specialized biliary surgeons at a single surgical unit within a DGH. This DGH also serves as a referral center for biliary cases from affiliated hospitals. The preference in our surgical unit is single stage management (laparoscopic cholecystectomy and simultaneous LCBDE) of CBD stones in surgically fit patients. The analysis included preoperative assessments, intraoperative observations, and postoperative outcomes, with respect to the published BBUGSS KPIs for LCBDE. Results 60 patients were eligible for inclusion; median age was 56 years (IQR 40-67) and 40 (66.7%) were female. 33 (55%) were emergency cases. 52 (86.7%) were transcystic exploration; of these 8 (15.4%) utilised basket-in-catheter and 44 (84.6%) utilised choledochoscopes. Median post-operative stay for transcystic exploration was 1 day (IQR 0-2) and for cholechodotomy 8 days (IQR 5-9). Key Performance IndicatorBBUGSS StandardOur outcomeConversion rates&amp;lt;10%0%Bile duct clearance rates&amp;gt;85%91.7%Bile Leak Rates&amp;lt;5%0%Returns to theatre&amp;lt;5%0%Readmission rates (within 30 days)&amp;lt;15%6.7%Overall Morbidity&amp;lt;15%3.3%Overall Mortality&amp;lt;1%0% Conclusion This study indicates that the BBUGSS KPIs for LCBDE are satisfactorily achieved in our centre. Adequate ductal clearance with minimal morbidity was achieved. Our outcomes are likely attributed to the recent commencement of a specialist biliary service and utilisation of predominantly transcystic approach, with the aid of electrohydraulic lithotripsy where needed, as opposed to choledochotomy. Furthermore, the present study suggests a high quality LCBDE service is feasible in a DGH setting if there is sufficient clinical and managerial motivation. We suggest that single stage management of bile duct stones model should be considered in other similar centres.

BN SO52 - Innovative Tools for Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE) in Torbay Hospital

Abstract Background Laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is a minimally invasive technique used to manage common bile duct (CBD) stones. The procedure has evolved significantly with the development of specialized tools that enhance efficacy and patient outcomes. This abstract aims to discuss the various tools employed for LCBDE at Torbay Hospital, highlighting their specific uses, benefits, and outcomes. Method We conducted a retrospective analysis of LCBDE procedures performed at Torbay Hospital. The tools used included the Pusen ‘Skinny scope’, Ambscope, Nathenson tipless basket, GB stone retrieval basket, and Rotacrusher. Data were collected on the types of tools used, procedural success rates, stone clearance rates, and any complications Results The Pusen ‘Skinny scope’ (3mm) was used in 60% of cases for transcystic exploration, showing high success in stone visualization and retrieval. The Ambscope (5mm) was used in 30% of cases for choledochotomy, effectively accessing larger stones. The Nathenson tipless basket retrieved up to 8mm stones in 45% of cases. The GB stone retrieval basket extracted non-disposable stones up to 2cm. The Rotacnsher, used for large stones in choledochotomy, was highly effective but needed larger port access. Laser and mechanical lithotripters fragmented stones larger than 1cm with an 85% success rate. Overall stone clearance was 90% with minimal complications. Conclusion The use of specialized tools in LCBDE at Torbay Hospital has significantly improved the management of CBD stones. The Pusen ‘Skinny scope’ and Ambscope provide excellent visualization and access, while the Nathenson tipless basket and GB stone retrieval basket offer reliable stone extraction capabilities. Advanced lithotripters further enhance the ability to manage larger stones. These tools collectively contribute to high success rates and favorable patient outcomes, reinforcing the value of LCBDE in modern surgical practice.

BN SO05 - Risk Factors associated with Complications Post-Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Abstract Background Gallstone-related diseases, particularly common bile duct (CBD) stones, present a significant global health issue. The adoption of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has revolutionized the management of these conditions by providing a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery. This literature review aims to identify and analyze the risk factors associated with complications in LCBDE, thereby offering insights to improve patient care and outcomes. Method comprehensive search for primary research studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses pertaining to risk factors for complications following LCBDE. The search was conducted on PubMed, focusing on English-language articles published within the last 20 years and encompassing all age groups. Peer-reviewed journal articles were prioritized. All relevant studies reporting complications after LCBDE were eligible for inclusion if available as full texts, structured abstracts, or conference reports. The initial search yielded 826 articles. Exclusion criteria : open surgery, non-English articles, lacking full-text. A total of 29 records were identified by the literature search. Results Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is generally safe and effective, with complication rates influenced by patient and procedural factors. Older age, comorbidities, previous abdominal surgeries, high BMI, narrow common bile ducts, and difficult stones increase risks. Experienced surgeons and shorter operative times reduce complications. The transcystic approach and primary suture closure have fewer complications compared to the transductal route and T-tube drainage, respectively. Intraoperative imaging significantly reduces risks by ensuring complete stone clearance and identifying anatomical variations. Tailoring surgical approaches to patient-specific factors and leveraging surgical expertise are crucial for minimizing complications in LCBDE. Conclusion LCBDE emerges as a safe and effective therapeutic modality for addressing conditions impacting the bile ducts (31). The success and utility of LCBDE can be significantly enhanced through the meticulous optimization of patient-related, surgeon-related, and procedure-related factors. By addressing and fine-tuning these key elements, the occurrence of complications associated with LCBDE can be mitigated, thereby reinforcing its potential as a primary choice for managing various bile duct conditions. This strategic approach not only underscores the clinical efficacy of LCBDE but also advocates for its expanded utilization as a frontline intervention in the comprehensive management of bile duct disorders.

VS 04 - HPB Laparoscopic trans-vesical approach is safe management for cholecystoduodenal fistula

Abstract Background A 71 year old female initially presented cholangitis. Her MRCP showed a distal common bile duct (CBD) stone. An ERCP was then performed which was not successful due to anatomical challenge in the form of a large diaphragmatic hernia. An elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy with IOC was performed. An incidental cholecystoduodenal fistula was found therefore the clinical decision was made to perform a trans-vesical approach to fistulogram. This showed a fistula was present and that it was not complicated further. This case shows that this approach avoided iatrogenic injury by confirming presence of the fistula and aided further surgical planning. Method Standard four-port technique with 10mm, 30-degree laparoscope. Blunt, sharp, energised and hydro-dissection were employed. The duodenum was adherent to the gallbladder body therefore a trans-vesical enterotomy was performed. Fistulogram confirmed presence of a cholecystoduodenal fistula but nil further pathology. The fistula was dissected from the gallbladder and stapled with the GIA endo- tri-staple 45 Purple. Further dissection to gallbladder to ensure clear visualisation of calot’s triangle. Basket trawl of the CBD was performed and repeat cholangiogram was clear. The gallbladder was dissected from gallbladder fossa, all gallstones were removed and 3L of wash was used to irrigate the intra-abdominal cavity. Results The patient was admitted following the procedure and was discharged on day two with PPI. She was reviewed post-operatively at 12 weeks and had no further issues. She remains well and has had no further episodes of cholangitis or hospital admissions in almost four years since the procedure. Conclusion This case shows an unexpected finding of cholecystoduodenal fistula in a planned laparoscopic cholecystectomy with IOC. It is important to note that some gas was seen in the gallbladder on initial imaging therefore indicating a possible cholecystoduodenal fistula. This trans-vesical approach with fistulogram confirmed a simple fistula and no further pathology and aided safe surgical planning. This improved patient outcomes and avoided iatrogenic injury thus providing a safer way to manage cholecystoenteric fistula. This novel approach to cholecystoduodenal fistula repair improves patient safety, length of stay and by aiding intra-operative planning and avoiding iatrogenic injury.

EGS SO07 - Laparoscopic retrieval of endoscopic lithotripsy basket aided by laser fragmentation: Case presentation and literature review

Abstract Background Large or impacted common bile duct (CBD) stones that cannot be removed by conventional endoscopic methods sometimes require endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy. A rare but feared technical complication related to this is basket entrapment, where the stone-basket complex cannot be separated from each other due to mechanical failure and becomes impacted within the CBD. We present a novel case of laparoscopic CBD exploration and antegrade laser fragmentation of impacted stone-basket complex, and perform a literature review pertaining to this topic. Method This is a case report from a single district general hospital with laparoscopic capabilities but no access to Spyglass. The operation began with fundus first subtotal cholecystectomy and the cystic duct was ligated with PDS endoloops. A choledochotomy was made and dilated to allow insertion of a 7.5 Fr cholangioscope. Through this, laser lithotripsy was undertaken which reduced the stone size and permitted disengagement of the stone from basket. The stone was retrieved via enlargement of the choledochotomy, while the basket and wire retrieved orally. We subsequently performed a literature review of Pubmed, Google Scholar, and Embase. Results Laparoscopic retrieval of an impacted basket was first described in 1993, with the basket found lodged in the gallbladder. The technique involved a large cholecystotomy, followed by removal of the basket, closure of the gallbladder, and then cholecystectomy. Our literature review yielded 5 case reports of laparoscopic retrieval of basket from the CBD. Three authors describe manual disengagement of the basket by laparoscopic manipulation of the wires, one describes capturing an impacted Dormia basket with a second Dormia basket, and one describes direct mechanical fragmentation and subsequent balloon trawl of the remaining debris. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first case report describing laparoscopic CBD exploration with concurrent laser fragmentation to facilitate retrieval of impacted stone-basket complex following mechanical lithotripsy failure. We propose that this is a viable option in centres without Spyglass or electrohydraulic lithotripsy, but where expertise for emergency laparoscopic CBD exploration exists.

BN SO12 - Management Strategies for Complications in Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Single Unit Comprehensive Analysis

Abstract Background 10-20% of individuals with systemic gallstones are estimated to have common bile duct stones (CBDS)(1). Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) and two stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with subsequent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are clinically equivalent in their purpose but associated with different risks and require different skill sets, training and facilities. This study has retrospectively reviewed all LCBDE in our Benign Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, in particular analysing complications, the management strategies employed, and the impact associated with these interventions. Method A retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients (n=427) who underwent LCBDE between November 2013 and May 2024 at our benign Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department to evaluate complications. Comparison is made with British Benign Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Society (BBUGSS) standards. Results 16.6% (n=71) experienced complications; 3.28% (n=14) retained stone, 3.74% (n=16) bile leak, 9.6% (n=41) non-specific surgical complications. Bile leak approaches were transcystic (n=2), transcystic converted to cholecdochotomy (n= 3), and choledochotomy n=11. Leaks were diagnosed on ERCP (50%), drains (n=3), CT (n=4) and clinical suspicion (n=1). 50% (n=8) were managed by ERCP, n=6 laparoscopic washout, and n=2 conservatively. Of retained stones, n=5 were indicated intraoperatively, n=7 on readmission with pain, n=1 on tubogram, and n=1 due to increased drain output. 80% (n=12) managed via ERCP with sphincterotomy +/- stenting. Of the remainder n=1 underwent open exploration, and n=1 managed conservatively. Conclusion Bile duct complications can be life altering and thus early identification and management is paramount. BBUGSS’ recommended performance standards for LCBDE state that frequency of retained stones should be &amp;lt;15%, bile leaks &amp;lt;5% and return to theatre &amp;lt;5% (2). In our trust rates are 3.51%, 3.74% and 1.64% respectively. Our stone clearance rate is 96.49%, higher than the BBUGSS standard of &amp;gt;85% (2). Our findings conclude that a benign UGI unit in a District General Hospital can deliver a one stage approach with good management of complications from LCBDE.

BN SO56 - Post-ERCP clearance of bile duct stones: Should the gallbladder be left in-situ?

Abstract Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard treatment for patients with cholelithiasis and co-existing common bile duct stones (CBSD) with the ultimate goal to prevent further biliary complications. Despite the procurement of ERCP and LC skills, there still remain a significant proportion of patients who are treated non-operatively. There has been debate on the safety of a ‘watch-and-wait’ policy post ERCP for clearance of CBDS alone. The objective of our study was to review our current practice and compare the outcomes of expectant management (EM) versus LC with an aim to evaluate the necessity of LC after ERCP. Method A retrospective review of patients who underwent ERCP for choledocholithiasis from 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2019 was performed. Exclusion criteria applied to patients with previous cholecystectomy, absence of CBDS, gallbladder/pancreatic malignancy, biliary stricture and patients lost to follow-up. Patient characteristics, details of ERCP, initial plan for EM or LC, details of LC and further changes in treatment plan were extracted from the prospectively maintained database of a single institution. Age 70 years is used as cut-off to define elderly group. Primary outcomes measured were biliary-related morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, operation-related morbidity and mortality. Results 265 patients were identified, with 136 patients primarily planned for EM and 129 patients initially booked for LC. The median age of patients in the EM group was greater than LC group (80 vs 62 years). 20.6% patients in the EM group re-presented with biliary events compared to 3.9% in the LC group. The median time from first ERCP to recurrence of biliary events in the EM group was 14 months. There was no significant correlation between age and complications from LC. However, 51.4% of our EM group died during follow up with a median survival of 29.5 months. Conclusion Prophylactic cholecystectomy should be performed for patients with concomitant cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis. A conservative approach should be reserved for the elderly population who are not ideal surgical candidates. A follow-up of up to 2 years is recommended for patients who opt for a ‘watch-and-wait’ approach. Early LC is preferrable due to the risk of recurrence of biliary events and the higher risks of surgery if patients require emergency surgery. Further study is warranted to determine the optimal timing for LC. Patients should be informed about the potential recurrence of symptoms if the waiting time to surgery is longer than expected.

HPB SO23 - Implementation and Outcomes of Index Admission Management of Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis on a Specialist Biliary Unit

Abstract Background While the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis (AP) has recognised guidelines, there are wide variations in compliance with these in various institutions for different reasons. The primary objective of this review was to evaluate the effects of implementing proactive management strategies on a specialist biliary firm receiving most biliary emergency admissions by protocol on the incidence of index admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for AP. The secondary aims were to study the admission to LC interval, if such policy was safe and how it can help the optimisation of outcomes of AP. Method Analysis of prospectively collected data from AP patients treated by a specialist biliary unit dedicated to index admission LC and single session laparoscopic management of bile duct stones. Almost all patients were referred to the unit as soon as the diagnosis of AP was made. Only patients with severe pancreatitis on imaging or requiring intensive care were not included in the index admission pathway and subsequently underwent delayed surgery. Routine MRCP and ERCP were not part of the management protocol. Following clinical optimisation patients had LC with routine cholangiography (IOC). and if necessary bile duct exploration. Results 495/6140 patients were identified (8%), 70% females. Median age was 55 years. 92.3% had suspected ductal stones, half with jaundice. 11.9% had previous episodes. Only 6.2% had MRCPs and 2% ERCPs. Admission to LC interval was 5 days. 33.2% required bile duct explorations. LC difficulty grade was III to V in 37.2%. The median operative time was 62 minutes with no conversions, ductal injuries or mortality. Complications occurred in 9.2%, including 14 persistent pancreatitis/collections resulting in 6 of 25 readmissions. Two re-operations resulted from t-tube complications. Median hospital stay was 7 days, 72% having had only one admission. Conclusion Index admission LC on all AP patients fit for surgery is perfectly safe in the specialist setting. It optimises preoperative radiological investigations and endoscopic interventions and ,subsequently, a third of the patients require bile duct exploration. Implementing definitive surgical interventions during the index admission for AP offers a substantial reduction in hospital stay, re-admission rates and an overall decrease in hospital attendances. This not only yields significant cost benefits for the health service but also enhances the quality of life for patients.

HPB SO59 - How do Previous Biliary Interventions Affect the Operative and Postoperative Outcomes Of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) and Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE)?

Abstract Background Laparoscopic biliary surgery is perceived to be difficult in patients who had undergone previous biliary interventions; ERCP, cholecystostomy or cholecystectomy. Our objective was to evaluate the referral pattern, the preoperative characteristics and operative and postoperative outcomes in such patients. Method Analysis of prospectively collected data from patients treated by a specialist biliary unit dedicated to index admission LC and single session laparoscopic management of bile duct stones. In spite of a policy of no preoperative endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones the unit inevitably received some patients who had had previous ERCP at other hospitals prior to referral or were initially unfit when admitted to the base hospital and required ERCP. In a series of 6140 LC and LCBDE 158 patients (2.57%) had already undergone ERCP and 31 (0.5%) had undergone cholecystectomies (18), cholecystostomies (9) or attempted cholecystectomy. Results Of 158 pre-referral ERCPs, 130 (82.3%) were referred from other hospitals, 36 (22.8%) having had more than one ERCP. 83.5% had suspected CBD stones. LC difficulty grade was IV to V in 48.7%. 112 patients (70.9%) required LCBDE. There were 10.1% biliary related complications, 3 re-operations, one conversion and one mortality. of 31 patients with previous biliary interventions, 58% came from other units or hospitals. A third had already undergone ERCP. 61.3% had LC difficulty grades IV or V. The 18 un-cholecystectomised patients needed LCBDE with no conversions or bile duct injuries. There were only 2 (6.5%) biliary related complications. Conclusion While previous biliary interventions understandably increased the difficulty of LC they did not adversely affect operative and postoperative outcomes. Such surgery should be undertaken in the specialist setting as 70.9% of those with previous endoscopic and 58.1% of those with previous surgical or radiologically guided biliary interventions require LCBDE. Implementing definitive surgical interventions during the index admission can achieve a substantial reduction in re-admission rates, and overall decrease in hospital episodes without significant morbidity, re-interventions or mortality. This enhances the quality of life for patients who would otherwise be subjected to multiple repeat ERCPs and yields significant cost benefits.